1. Home
  2. NCAAF
  3. 2024 Week 14
NCAAF · 2024

NCAAF Week 14 games

FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 14: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results
67 finalFavorites 38-28 ATS18 upsetsO/U 36-31Model Favorite 49-18Week in numbers ›

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games6767 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS38-2858% covered
Upsets18outright
Over / Under36-3154% over
Model Favorite49-1873% won
Totals moved 1+ ptTap to filter
Moved up15 all 15 final
Over6 40%Under9 60%
Moved down39 all 39 final
Over22 56%Under17 44%
Did the team the spread moved toward cover? ATS vs the closing line, by how far it moved
Moved towardThis week20242024–2026
Any move
30–2654%
324–33549%
789–801–850%
1.5+ pts
15–1944%
192–19749%
446–443–450%
3+ pts
5–363%
76–8348%
215–206–251%
5+ pts
—
15–1944%
47–4551%
7+ pts
—
4–544%
13–765%
Covered–didn’t–push; % leaves out pushes and is grey under 10 games; green or red from 10 games. ClickTap a row or count to filter.
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Tuesday, Nov 26

2
Final · Conf
Toledo
7-4 · #88
14
Akron
3-8 · #124
21
Spread
TOL -9.5
✓ AKR W ATS
Total
50.5 ▲2
▼ Under 35
Projected
28–19
✗ TOL lost
Trend: TOL ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: AKR by 1 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Kent State
0-11 · #134
7
Buffalo
7-4 · #105
43
Spread
BUFF -23.5
✓ BUFF W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼2
▼ Under 50
Projected
14–37
✓ BUFF won
Trend: BUFF ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: KENT by 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q2

Thursday, Nov 28

1
Final · Conf
Memphis
9-2 · #56
34
Tulane
9-2 · #40
24
Spread
TULN -12.5
✓ MEM W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼2
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
20–33
✗ TULN lost
Trend: TULN ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: TULN by 1 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1

Friday, Nov 29

14
Final · Non-conf
Oregon State
5-6 · #98
18
Boise State
10-1 · #29
34
Spread
BOIS -17.5
✓ ORST W ATS
Total
58.5 ▲2
▼ Under 52
Projected
21–39
✓ BOIS won
Trend: BOIS ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: BOIS by 5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Oklahoma State
3-8 · #87
0
Colorado
8-3 · #25
52
Spread
COLO -14.5
✓ COLO W ATS
Total
66.5 ▲2
▼ Under 52
Projected
24–39
✓ COLO won
Trend: COLO ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: COLO by 5 ✓ Model: Under 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Minnesota
6-5 · #26
24
Wisconsin
5-6 · #47
7
Spread
MINN -1.5
✓ MINN W ATS
Total
40.5 ▼4
▼ Under 31
Projected
20–19
✓ MINN won
Trend: MINN ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: WIS by 2 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Miami (OH)
7-4 · #73
28
Bowling Green
7-4 · #75
12
Spread
BGSU -3
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
37.5 ▼6
▲ Over 40 · Q4
Projected
18–21
✗ BGSU lost
Trend: BGSU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: BGSU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Ball State
3-8 · #126
21
Ohio
8-3 · #65
42
Spread
OHIO -17.5
✓ OHIO W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼1
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
16–34
✓ OHIO won
Model: OHIO by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Navy
7-3 · #61
34
East Carolina
7-4 · #92
20
Spread
—
 
Total
52.5 ▼4
▲ Over 54 · Q4
Projected
28–26
✓ NAVY won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓
Final · Conf
Mississippi State
2-9 · #72
14
Ole Miss
8-3 · #3
26
Spread
MISS -26.5
✓ MSST W ATS
Total
63.5 ▲2
▼ Under 40
Projected
17–44
✓ MISS won
Trend: MSST ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: MISS by 5 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Liberty
8-2 · #95
18
Sam Houston
8-3 · #93
20
Spread
LIB -2.5
✓ SHSU W ATS
Total
47.5
▼ Under 38
Projected
26–24
✗ LIB lost
Trend: SHSU ATS ✓ Model: SHSU by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Utah State
4-7 · #106
37
Colorado State
7-4 · #100
42
Spread
CSU -5.5
✓ USU W ATS
Total
56.5 ▼4
▲ Over 79 · Q4
Projected
27–33
✓ CSU won
Trend: CSU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: CSU by 1 ✗ Model: Over 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Texas State
6-5 · #54
45
South Alabama
6-5 · #66
38
Spread
TXST -2.5
✓ TXST W ATS
Total
60.5 ▼2
▲ Over 83 · Q3
Projected
30–28
✓ TXST won
Trend: TXST ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: USA by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
Stanford
3-8 · #96
31
San José State
6-5 · #86
34
Spread
SJSU -2.5
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼1
▲ Over 65 · Q4
Projected
25–28
✓ SJSU won
Model: SJSU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
Georgia Tech
7-4 · #36
42
Georgia
9-2 · #8
44
Spread
UGA -17.5
✓ GT W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼6
▲ Over 86 · Q4
Projected
17–34
✓ UGA won
Trend: GT ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Nebraska
6-5 · #41
10
Iowa
7-4 · #30
13
Spread
IOWA -3.5
✓ NEB W ATS
Total
41.5 ▲2
▼ Under 23
Projected
18–22
✓ IOWA won
Trend: NEB ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: IOWA by 4 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Utah
4-7 · #49
28
UCF
4-7 · #37
14
Spread
UCF -9.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼4
▼ Under 42
Projected
18–28
✗ UCF lost
Trend: UCF ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: UTAH by 0 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1

Saturday, Nov 30

50
Final · Conf
Michigan
6-5 · #27
13
Ohio State
10-1 · #1
10
Spread
OSU -20.5
✓ MICH W ATS
Total
41.5 ▼3
▼ Under 23
Projected
11–32
✗ OSU lost
Trend: Under ✓ Model: OSU by 2 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Tennessee
9-2 · #11
36
Vanderbilt
6-5 · #53
23
Spread
TENN -9.5
✓ TENN W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼2
▲ Over 59 · Q3
Projected
31–21
✓ TENN won
Trend: VAN ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: TENN by 4 ✓ Model: Over 7 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
South Carolina
8-3 · #13
17
Clemson
9-2 · #17
14
Spread
CLEM -2.5
✓ SC W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼1
▼ Under 31
Projected
25–27
✗ CLEM lost
Trend: SC ATS ✓ Model: CLEM by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Neutral
Illinois
8-3 · #44
38
Northwestern
4-7 · #83
28
Spread
ILL -8.5
✓ ILL W ATS
Total
42.5 ▼3
▲ Over 66 · Q3
Projected
26–18
✓ ILL won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: ILL by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
Louisville
7-4 · #14
41
Kentucky
4-7 · #50
14
Spread
LOU -3.5
✓ LOU W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼1
▲ Over 55 · Q4
Projected
26–22
✓ LOU won
Trend: UK ATS ✗ Model: LOU by 2.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
UConn
7-4 · #80
47
Massachusetts
2-9 · #125
42
Spread
CONN -9.5
✓ MASS W ATS
Total
49.5 ▼1
▲ Over 89 · Q2
Projected
30–20
✓ CONN won
Model: CONN by 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Duke
8-3 · #60
23
Wake Forest
4-7 · #89
17
Spread
DUKE -3.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼1
▼ Under 40
Projected
28–24
✓ DUKE won
Trend: DUKE ATS ✓ Model: DUKE by 2.5 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Kansas
5-6 · #35
17
Baylor
7-4 · #39
45
Spread
KU -2.5
✓ BAY W ATS
Total
62.5 ▲2
▼ Under 62
Projected
31–29
✗ KU lost
Trend: BAY ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: BAY by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
West Virginia
6-5 · #63
15
Texas Tech
7-4 · #46
52
Spread
TTU -2.5
✓ TTU W ATS
Total
61.5 ▼3
▲ Over 67 · Q4
Projected
29–32
✓ TTU won
Trend: WVU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: TTU by 2 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Louisiana
9-2 · #71
37
UL Monroe
5-6 · #115
23
Spread
UL -8.5
✓ UL W ATS
Total
50.5 ▲1
▲ Over 60 · Q4
Projected
30–21
✓ UL won
Trend: ULM ATS ✗ Model: UL by 3 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
UTSA
6-5 · #82
24
Army
9-1 · #52
29
Spread
ARMY -6.5
✓ UTSA W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼2
▼ Under 53
Projected
21–29
✓ ARMY won
Trend: ARMY ATS ✗ Model: ARMY by 5.5 ✗ Model: Under 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
North Texas
5-6 · #94
24
Temple
3-8 · #127
17
Spread
UNT -10.5
✓ TEM W ATS
Total
63.5
▼ Under 41
Projected
37–26
✓ UNT won
Trend: TEM ATS ✓ Model: TEM by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Eastern Michigan
5-6 · #120
18
Western Michigan
5-6 · #107
26
Spread
WMU -6.5
✓ WMU W ATS
Total
56.5 ▼1
▼ Under 44
Projected
25–31
✓ WMU won
Model: EMU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Middle Tennessee
3-8 · #129
24
Florida International
3-8 · #121
35
Spread
FIU -9.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼2
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
20–29
✓ FIU won
Trend: FIU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: FIU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Coastal Carolina
5-6 · #101
48
Georgia State
3-8 · #110
27
Spread
GAST -0.5
✓ CCU W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼3
▲ Over 75 · Q4
Projected
27–27
✗ GAST lost
Trend: Under ✗ Model: GAST by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Southern Miss
1-10 · #132
20
Troy
3-8 · #97
52
Spread
TROY -17.5
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
48.5
▲ Over 72 · Q4
Projected
15–33
✓ TROY won
Trend: TROY ATS ✓ Model: TROY by 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
South Florida
6-5 · #91
28
Rice
3-8 · #104
35
Spread
USF -5.5
✓ RICE W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲1
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
28–23
✗ USF lost
Trend: USF ATS ✗ Model: RICE by 3 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Pittsburgh
7-4 · #57
23
Boston College
6-5 · #58
34
Spread
BC -3.5
✓ BC W ATS
Total
50.5 ▲1
▲ Over 57 · Q4
Projected
24–27
✓ BC won
Trend: BC ATS ✓ Model: PITT by 3 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Old Dominion
4-7 · #78
40
Arkansas State
7-4 · #113
32
Spread
ODU -5.5
✓ ODU W ATS
Total
58.5
▲ Over 72 · Q3
Projected
30–25
✓ ODU won
Model: ODU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Maryland
4-7 · #62
7
Penn State
10-1 · #6
44
Spread
PSU -26.5
✓ PSU W ATS
Total
50.5 ▲1
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
12–37
✓ PSU won
Trend: PSU ATS ✓ Model: MD by 4 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
Notre Dame
10-1 · #4
49
USC
6-5 · #16
35
Spread
ND -6.5
✓ ND W ATS
Total
52.5 ▲2
▲ Over 84 · Q3
Projected
30–23
✓ ND won
Trend: Over ✓ Model: USC by 2 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Miami
10-1 · #9
38
Syracuse
8-3 · #43
42
Spread
MIA -12.5
✓ SYR W ATS
Total
65.5 ▼2
▲ Over 80 · Q4
Projected
39–26
✗ MIA lost
Trend: MIA ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: MIA by 2 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
California
6-5 · #55
6
SMU
10-1 · #15
38
Spread
SMU -11.5
✓ SMU W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼3
▼ Under 44
Projected
21–33
✓ SMU won
Trend: CAL ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: SMU by 2 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Auburn
5-6 · #33
14
Alabama
8-3 · #7
28
Spread
ALA -10.5
✓ ALA W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼2
▼ Under 42
Projected
20–32
✓ ALA won
Trend: AUB ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: ALA by 6 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Arizona State
9-2 · #18
49
Arizona
4-7 · #79
7
Spread
ASU -7.5
✓ ASU W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼1
▲ Over 56 · Q4
Projected
30–23
✓ ASU won
Trend: ASU ATS ✓ Model: ARIZ by 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Arkansas
6-5 · #32
21
Missouri
8-3 · #23
28
Spread
MIZ -3.5
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼3
▼ Under 49
Projected
24–28
✓ MIZ won
Trend: ARK ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: MIZ by 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Rutgers
6-5 · #51
41
Michigan State
5-6 · #70
14
Spread
MSU -1.5
✓ RUTG W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼1
▲ Over 55 · Q4
Projected
22–23
✗ MSU lost
Trend: RUTG ATS ✓ Model: RUTG by 1 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
Fresno State
6-5 · #84
13
UCLA
4-7 · #48
20
Spread
UCLA -7.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
46.5
▼ Under 33
Projected
19–27
✓ UCLA won
Trend: FRES ATS ✓ Model: UCLA by 4.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
NC State
5-6 · #67
35
North Carolina
6-5 · #64
30
Spread
UNC -2.5
✓ NCSU W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼2
▲ Over 65 · Q4
Projected
26–30
✗ UNC lost
Trend: NCSU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: UNC by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Central Michigan
4-7 · #123
16
Northern Illinois
6-5 · #74
24
Spread
NIU -16.5
✓ CMU W ATS
Total
41.5 ▼4
▼ Under 40
Projected
13–30
✓ NIU won
Trend: NIU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: NIU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
UAB
3-8 · #116
27
Charlotte
4-7 · #119
29
Spread
CLT -1.5
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
59.5 ▲2
▼ Under 56
Projected
28–30
✓ CLT won
Trend: Over ✗ Model: CLT by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Florida Atlantic
2-9 · #118
63
Tulsa
3-8 · #131
16
Spread
FAU -2.5
✓ FAU W ATS
Total
57.5 ▲1
▲ Over 79 · Q3
Projected
28–26
✓ FAU won
Trend: TLSA ATS ✗ Model: FAU by 1 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Jacksonville State
8-3 · #81
17
Western Kentucky
7-4 · #103
19
Spread
JXST -0.5
✓ WKU W ATS
Total
62.5 ▲2
▼ Under 36
Projected
31–31
✗ JXST lost
Trend: JXST ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: WKU by 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Kennesaw State
2-9 · #133
0
Louisiana Tech
4-7 · #112
33
Spread
LT -13.5
✓ LT W ATS
Total
41.5 ▼1
▼ Under 33
Projected
13–27
✓ LT won
Model: LT by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
UTEP
2-9 · #128
42
New Mexico State
3-8 · #130
35
Spread
NMSU -3.5
✓ UTEP W ATS
Total
51.5
▲ Over 77 · Q3
Projected
24–27
✗ NMSU lost
Trend: NMSU ATS ✗ Model: UTEP by 4.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
TCU
7-4 · #34
20
Cincinnati
5-6 · #45
13
Spread
TCU -2.5
✓ TCU W ATS
Total
58.5
▼ Under 33
Projected
31–29
✓ TCU won
Model: CIN by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
App State
5-5 · #99
20
Georgia Southern
7-4 · #90
29
Spread
GASO -2.5
✓ GASO W ATS
Total
60.5 ▼2
▼ Under 49
Projected
29–32
✓ GASO won
Trend: APP ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: GASO by 2 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
Wyoming
2-9 · #114
15
Washington State
8-3 · #68
14
Spread
WSU -18.5
✓ WYO W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼3
▼ Under 29
Projected
18–37
✗ WSU lost
Trend: WSU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: WSU by 1 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Purdue
1-10 · #117
0
Indiana
10-1 · #10
66
Spread
IU -28.5
✓ IU W ATS
Total
56.5
▲ Over 66 · Q4
Projected
13–42
✓ IU won
Trend: IU ATS ✓ Model: IU by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
Florida
6-5 · #21
31
Florida State
2-9 · #85
11
Spread
FLA -17.5
✓ FLA W ATS
Total
45.5
▼ Under 42
Projected
31–15
✓ FLA won
Trend: FLA ATS ✓ Model: FSU by 6 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Oklahoma
6-5 · #28
17
LSU
7-4 · #12
37
Spread
LSU -4.5
✓ LSU W ATS
Total
47.5
▲ Over 54 · Q3
Projected
24–28
✓ LSU won
Trend: OU ATS ✗ Model: LSU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Washington
6-5 · #31
21
Oregon
11-0 · #5
49
Spread
ORE -17.5
✓ ORE W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼1
▲ Over 70 · Q4
Projected
18–35
✓ ORE won
Trend: ORE ATS ✓ Model: WASH by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Texas
10-1 · #2
17
Texas A&M
8-3 · #19
7
Spread
TEX -4.5
✓ TEX W ATS
Total
49.5 ▲1
▼ Under 24
Projected
28–23
✓ TEX won
Trend: TEX ATS ✓ Model: TEX by 5 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Kansas State
8-3 · #20
21
Iowa State
9-2 · #24
29
Spread
ISU -2.5
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼1
▼ Under 50
Projected
24–26
✓ ISU won
Trend: ISU ATS ✓ Model: KSU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Nevada
3-9 · #102
14
UNLV
9-2 · #42
38
Spread
UNLV -17.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼1
▼ Under 52
Projected
19–36
✓ UNLV won
Trend: NEV ATS ✗ Model: UNLV by 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Virginia
5-6 · #77
17
Virginia Tech
5-6 · #38
37
Spread
VT -4.5
✓ VT W ATS
Total
44.5 ▼4
▲ Over 54 · Q4
Projected
21–27
✓ VT won
Trend: UVA ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: VT by 9 ✓ Model: Over 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Marshall
8-3 · #69
35
James Madison
8-3 · #59
33
Spread
JMU -2.5
✓ MRSH W ATS
Total
52.5
▲ Over 68 · OT
Projected
24–28
✗ JMU lost
Trend: MRSH ATS ✓ Model: JMU by 6.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Houston
4-7 · #76
18
BYU
9-2 · #22
30
Spread
BYU -9.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
39.5 ▼3
▲ Over 48 · Q4
Projected
15–26
✓ BYU won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: BYU by 9.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Air Force
4-7 · #108
31
San Diego State
3-8 · #122
20
Spread
AFA -6.5
✓ AFA W ATS
Total
43.5
▲ Over 51 · Q3
Projected
23–18
✓ AFA won
Model: SDSU by 7.5 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
New Mexico
5-6 · #111
30
Hawai'i
4-7 · #109
38
Spread
UNM -6.5
✓ HAW W ATS
Total
61.5
▲ Over 68 · Q4
Projected
33–29
✗ UNM lost
Trend: UNM ATS ✗ Model: HAW by 10.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total