Week in numbers
Tap a number to filter the games below
Totals moved 1+ ptTap to filter
Did the team the spread moved toward cover? ATS vs the closing line, by how far it moved
| Moved toward | This week | 2024 | 2024–2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Any move | 324–33549% | 789–801–850% | |
| 1.5+ pts | 192–19749% | 446–443–450% | |
| 3+ pts | 76–8348% | 215–206–251% | |
| 5+ pts | 0–10% | 15–1944% | 47–4551% |
| 7+ pts | 0–10% | 4–544% | 13–765% |
Covered–didn’t–push; % leaves out pushes and is grey under 10 games; green or red from 10 games. ClickTap a row or count to filter.
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Jump to
Tuesday, Nov 12
3Final · Conf
Spread
BUFF -3.5
✓ BALL W ATS
Total
54.5 ▲1
▲ Over 99 · Q3
Projected
25–29
✓ BUFF won
Final · Conf
Spread
BGSU -9.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
56.5
▼ Under 44
Projected
23–33
✓ BGSU won
Final · Conf
Spread
TOL -14.5
✓ TOL W ATS
Total
51.5 ▲3
▼ Under 47
Projected
19–34
✓ TOL won
Wednesday, Nov 13
3Final · Conf
Spread
M-OH -30.5
✓ KENT W ATS
Total
45.5
▼ Under 41
Projected
9–39
✓ M-OH won
Final · Conf
Spread
NIU -14.5
✓ AKR W ATS
Total
43.5 ▼4
▲ Over 45 · Q4
Projected
13–29
✓ NIU won
Final · Conf
Spread
OHIO -10.5
✓ OHIO W ATS
Total
51.5 ▲3
▼ Under 45
Projected
19–30
✓ OHIO won
Thursday, Nov 14
1Final · Conf
Spread
ECU -16.5
✓ TLSA W ATS
Total
63.5 ▲2
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
36–21
✓ ECU won
Friday, Nov 15
4Final · Conf
Spread
CSU -7.5
✓ CSU W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼1
▼ Under 34
Projected
20–28
✓ CSU won
Final · Conf
Spread
UTSA -1.5
✓ UTSA W ATS
Total
71.5
▲ Over 75 · Q4
Projected
33–34
✓ UTSA won
Final · Conf
Spread
WASH -5.5
✓ WASH W ATS
Total
47.5 ▲1
▲ Over 50 · Q4
Projected
21–27
✓ WASH won
Saturday, Nov 16
42Final · Conf
Spread
OSU -29.5
✓ NU W ATS
Total
44.5
▼ Under 38
Projected
36–7
✓ OSU won
Final · Conf
Spread
CLEM -12.5
✓ PITT W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼5
▼ Under 44
Projected
34–23
✓ CLEM won
Final · Non-conf
Spread
LIB -16.5
✓ MASS W ATS
Total
52.5 ▲1
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
34–18
✓ LIB won
Final · Conf
Spread
WKU -11.5
✓ LT W ATS
Total
52.5
▼ Under 19
Projected
20–31
✗ WKU lost
Final · Conf
Spread
MRSH -7.5
✓ MRSH W ATS
Total
56.5 ▲1
▼ Under 50
Projected
24–32
✓ MRSH won
Final · Conf
Spread
JXST -12.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
58.5 ▲1
▲ Over 65 · Q4
Projected
21–34
✓ JXST won
Final · Conf
Spread
TEM -2.5
✓ TEM W ATS
Total
50.5 ▲1
▼ Under 33
Projected
23–25
✓ TEM won
Final · Conf
Spread
ILL -1.5
✓ ILL W ATS
Total
47.5 ▼1
▲ Over 54 · Q4
Projected
22–24
✓ ILL won
Final · Conf
Spread
CAL -10.5
✓ SYR W ATS
Total
57.5 ▲2
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
22–32
✗ CAL lost
Final · Conf
Spread
SHSU -20.5
✓ KENN W ATS
Total
43.5 ▲1
▼ Under 40
Projected
31–12
✓ SHSU won
Final · Conf
Spread
HAW -2.5
✓ USU W ATS
Total
61.5 ▲3
▲ Over 65 · Q4
Projected
30–28
✗ HAW lost
Final · Conf
Spread
PSU -30.5
✓ PSU W ATS
Total
51.5 ▲2
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
41–10
✓ PSU won
Final · Non-conf
Spread
ND -21.5
✓ UVA W ATS
Total
51.5 ▲1
▼ Under 49
Projected
13–35
✓ ND won
Final · Conf
Spread
SMU -19.5
✓ BC W ATS
Total
53.5
▲ Over 66 · Q4
Projected
17–36
✓ SMU won
Final · Conf
Spread
LOU -20.5
✓ STAN W ATS
Total
57.5 ▼1
▲ Over 73 · Q4
Projected
37–17
✗ LOU lost
Final · Non-conf
Spread
ORST -2.5
✓ AFA W ATS
Total
44.5
▼ Under 28
Projected
24–21
✗ ORST lost
Final · Conf
Spread
CLT -1.5
✓ USF W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲2
▲ Over 83 · Q3
Projected
26–27
✗ CLT lost
Final · Conf
Spread
BAY -1.5
✓ BAY W ATS
Total
57.5 ▼2
▲ Over 84 · Q2
Projected
29–29
✓ BAY won
Final · Conf
Spread
GASO -7.5
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼1
▼ Under 48
Projected
24–31
✗ GASO lost
Final · Conf
Spread
JMU -1.5
✓ JMU W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼1
▲ Over 67 · Q3
Projected
26–23
✓ JMU won
Final · Conf
Spread
SC -10.5
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
42.5 ▼2
▲ Over 64 · Q4
Projected
18–28
✓ SC won
Final · Conf
Spread
GAST -2.5
✓ ARST W ATS
Total
58.5
▼ Under 47
Projected
28–31
✗ GAST lost
Final · Conf
Spread
BOIS -14.5
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
61.5 ▲1
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
38–24
✓ BOIS won
Final · Conf
Spread
KSU -7.5
✓ ASU W ATS
Total
51.5 ▲1
▼ Under 38
Projected
21–29
✗ KSU lost
Final · Conf
Spread
UL -6.5
✓ USA W ATS
Total
60.5 ▲1
▼ Under 46
Projected
26–32
✗ UL lost
Final · Conf
Spread
TXST -27.5
✓ TXST W ATS
Total
55.5
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
14–42
✓ TXST won
Final · Non-conf
Spread
TA&M -38.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼1
▼ Under 41
Projected
5–44
✓ TA&M won
Final · Conf
Spread
UNC -10.5
✓ WAKE W ATS
Total
64.5 ▲1
▼ Under 55
Projected
26–37
✓ UNC won
Final · Conf
Spread
ISU -7.5
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼1
▼ Under 51
Projected
21–28
✓ ISU won
Final · Non-conf
Spread
WSU -11.5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
71.5 ▼1
▲ Over 73 · Q4
Projected
42–30
✗ WSU lost
Final · Conf
Spread
UNLV -19.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
54.5 ▲2
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
17–37
✓ UNLV won
Loading…
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Move | Total | Model | Signal | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||||||
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total