FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 2: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games5151 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS17-3334% covered
Upsets17outright
Over / Under22-2844% over
Model Favorite34-1767% won
Did the team the spread moved toward cover? ATS vs the closing line, by how far it moved
Moved towardThis week20242024–2026
Any move
22–2250%
324–33549%
789–801–850%
1.5+ pts
14–1745%
192–19749%
446–443–450%
3+ pts
3–925%
76–8348%
215–206–251%
5+ pts
1–233%
15–1944%
47–4551%
7+ pts
1–0100%
4–544%
13–765%
Covered–didn’t–push; % leaves out pushes and is grey under 10 games; green or red from 10 games. ClickTap a row or count to filter.
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Friday, Sep 6

2
Final · Non-conf
BYU
1-0 · #22
18
SMU
2-0 · #15
15
Spread
SMU -12.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲1
▼ Under 33
Projected
19–33
✗ SMU lost
Model: SMU by 5.5 ✗ Model: Under 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
Duke
1-0 · #60
26
1-0 · #83
20
Spread
NU -2.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
37.5 ▼3
▲ Over 46 · OT
Projected
20–22
✗ NU lost
Trend: Under ✗ Model: DUKE by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3

Saturday, Sep 7

49
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #2
31
1-0 · #27
12
Spread
TEX -6.5
✓ TEX W ATS
Total
41.5 ▼7
▲ Over 43 · Q4
Projected
26–21
✓ TEX won
Trend: TEX ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: MICH by 7 ✗ Model: Over 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #75
27
1-0 · #6
34
Spread
PSU -35.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
51.5 ▲3
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
5–40
✓ PSU won
Trend: PSU ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: BGSU by 6 ✓ Model: Under 6.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #32
31
1-0 · #87
39
Spread
OKST -10.5
✓ ARK W ATS
Total
60.5 ▲8
▲ Over 70 · Q4
Projected
24–32
✓ OKST won
Trend: OKST ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: ARK by 14.5 ✓ Model: Under 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #20
34
1-0 · #40
27
Spread
KSU -9.5
✓ TULN W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼2
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
29–19
✓ KSU won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: TULN by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-0 · #36
28
1-0 · #43
31
Spread
GT -2.5
✓ SYR W ATS
Total
60.5 ▲6
▼ Under 59
Projected
30–27
✗ GT lost
Trend: Over ✗ Model: SYR by 1 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #124
17
1-0 · #51
49
Spread
RUTG -24.5
✓ RUTG W ATS
Total
41.5
▲ Over 66 · Q3
Projected
11–36
✓ RUTG won
Model: RUTG by 0 ✓ Model: Over 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #57
28
1-0 · #45
27
Spread
PITT -2.5
✓ CIN W ATS
Total
62.5 ▲3
▼ Under 55
Projected
27–26
✓ PITT won
Trend: PITT ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: CIN by 4.5 ✓ Model: Under 9.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
Troy
0-1 · #97
17
1-0 · #56
38
Spread
MEM -18.5
✓ MEM W ATS
Total
57.5 ▲3
▼ Under 55
Projected
17–34
✓ MEM won
Trend: MEM ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: TROY by 9 ✗ Model: Under 6.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Army
1-0 · #52
24
0-1 · #118
7
Spread
FAU -1.5
✓ ARMY W ATS
Total
42.5 ▼2
▼ Under 31
Projected
20–22
✗ FAU lost
Trend: Under ✓ Model: FAU by 6 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
34
0-0 · #126
42
Spread
BALL -2.5
✓ BALL W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼2
▲ Over 76 · Q4
Projected
21–25
✓ BALL won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: BALL by 10 ✓ Model: Under 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #74
16
1-0 · #4
14
Spread
ND -28.5
✓ NIU W ATS
Total
46.5
▼ Under 30
Projected
8–37
✗ ND lost
Trend: NIU ATS ✓ Model: ND by 1 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #39
12
Utah
1-0 · #49
23
Spread
UTAH -14.5
✓ BAY W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼1
▼ Under 35
Projected
16–31
✓ UTAH won
Trend: UTAH ATS ✗ Model: UTAH by 1 ✗ Model: Under 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #24
20
Iowa
1-0 · #30
19
Spread
IOWA -2.5
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
36.5 ▼1
▲ Over 39 · Q4
Projected
17–19
✗ IOWA lost
Model: ISU by 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #81
14
1-0 · #14
49
Spread
LOU -27.5
✓ LOU W ATS
Total
56.5 ▼2
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
12–39
✓ LOU won
Trend: LOU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: JXST by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #55
21
1-0 · #33
14
Spread
AUB -11.5
✓ CAL W ATS
Total
52.5 ▲3
▼ Under 35
Projected
21–33
✗ AUB lost
Trend: Over ✗ Model: AUB by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-0 · #13
31
1-0 · #50
6
Spread
UK -9.5
✓ SC W ATS
Total
41.5 ▼4
▼ Under 37
Projected
19–28
✗ UK lost
Trend: Under ✓ Model: SC by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-0 · #70
27
1-0 · #62
24
Spread
MD -7.5
✓ MSU W ATS
Total
44.5 ▼2
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
20–29
✗ MD lost
Trend: MSU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: MD by 7.5 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #120
9
1-0 · #31
30
Spread
WASH -25.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
49.5 ▲2
▼ Under 39
Projected
12–38
✓ WASH won
Trend: WASH ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: WASH by 4 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #125
23
1-0 · #88
38
Spread
TOL -17.5
✓ MASS W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼1
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
18–35
✓ TOL won
Trend: MASS ATS ✓ Model: MASS by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #119
20
1-0 · #64
38
Spread
UNC -21.5
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
47.5 ▼1
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
14–35
✓ UNC won
Model: CLT by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
0-1 · #127
11
Navy
1-0 · #61
38
Spread
NAVY -11.5
✓ NAVY W ATS
Total
43.5 ▼1
▲ Over 49 · Q4
Projected
18–28
✓ NAVY won
Trend: TEM ATS ✗ Model: TEM by 6.5 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
UTSA
1-0 · #82
10
1-0 · #54
49
Spread
TXST -2.5
✓ TXST W ATS
Total
58.5 ▼2
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
26–27
✓ TXST won
Trend: TXST ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: UTSA by 5 ✗ Model: Under 5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #129
3
1-0 · #3
52
Spread
MISS -42.5
✓ MISS W ATS
Total
60.5 ▼2
▼ Under 55
Projected
7–47
✓ MISS won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: MTSU by 10 ✗ Model: Under 6 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #69
14
0-1 · #38
31
Spread
VT -20.5
✓ MRSH W ATS
Total
52.5 ▲5
▼ Under 45
Projected
16–35
✓ VT won
Trend: VT ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: MRSH by 9.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #123
16
0-1 · #121
52
Spread
CMU -3.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
51.5
▲ Over 68 · Q3
Projected
28–24
✗ CMU lost
Model: CMU by 3 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #92
20
0-1 · #78
14
Spread
ODU -1.5
✓ ECU W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲5
▼ Under 34
Projected
21–22
✗ ODU lost
Trend: Over ✗ Model: ECU by 0 ✓ Model: Under 11 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #66
20
Ohio
0-1 · #65
27
Spread
USA -1.5
✓ OHIO W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲1
▼ Under 47
Projected
27–25
✗ USA lost
Model: USA by 1 ✗ Model: Under 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #91
16
1-0 · #7
42
Spread
ALA -33.5
✓ USF W ATS
Total
65.5 ▲2
▼ Under 58
Projected
11–44
✓ ALA won
Trend: ALA ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: ALA by 1 ✗ Model: Under 10.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #105
0
1-0 · #23
38
Spread
MIZ -34.5
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲1
▼ Under 38
Projected
7–41
✓ MIZ won
Model: BUFF by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #35
17
1-0 · #44
23
Spread
KU -4.5
✓ ILL W ATS
Total
58.5
▼ Under 40
Projected
31–26
✗ KU lost
Trend: ILL ATS ✓ Model: KU by 2 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-0 · #77
31
1-0 · #89
30
Spread
UVA -1.5
✓ WAKE W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲1
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
27–27
✓ UVA won
Trend: UVA ATS ✗ Model: WAKE by 4.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #71
34
0-1 · #133
10
Spread
UL -14.5
✓ UL W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼1
▼ Under 44
Projected
33–20
✓ UL won
Trend: KENN ATS ✗ Model: KENN by 5 ✗ Model: Over 7.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
1-0 · #86
17
1-0 · #108
7
Spread
AFA -1.5
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
43.5 ▼3
▼ Under 24
Projected
24–25
✗ AFA lost
Trend: AFA ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: SJSU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 6 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #90
20
1-1 · #102
17
Spread
NEV -1.5
✓ GASO W ATS
Total
56.5 ▲1
▼ Under 37
Projected
28–31
✗ NEV lost
Trend: NEV ATS ✗ Model: NEV by 4 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #131
24
1-0 · #113
28
Spread
ARST -9.5
✓ TLSA W ATS
Total
65.5 ▲1
▼ Under 52
Projected
26–34
✓ ARST won
Trend: ARST ATS ✗ Model: TLSA by 9 ✓ Model: Under 6 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
UAB
1-0 · #116
6
1-0 · #115
32
Spread
UAB -10.5
✓ ULM W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲1
▼ Under 38
Projected
31–21
✗ UAB lost
Model: UAB by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #93
14
UCF
1-0 · #37
45
Spread
UCF -21.5
✓ UCF W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼5
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
14–36
✓ UCF won
Trend: SHSU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: UCF by 0 ✓ Model: Under 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #107
0
1-0 · #1
56
Spread
OSU -37.5
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
54.5
▲ Over 56 · Q4
Projected
9–47
✓ OSU won
Trend: WMU ATS ✗ Model: OSU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Neutral
1-0 · #11
51
1-0 · #67
10
Spread
TENN -13.5
✓ TENN W ATS
Total
59.5 ▼1
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
32–19
✓ TENN won
Trend: TENN ATS ✓ Model: NCSU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 8.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #25
10
1-0 · #41
28
Spread
—
 
Total
—
 
Projected
21–31
✓ NEB won
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #76
12
1-0 · #28
16
Spread
OU -27.5
✓ HOU W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼4
▼ Under 28
Projected
11–40
✓ OU won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: OU by 4.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #99
20
0-1 · #17
66
Spread
CLEM -13.5
✓ CLEM W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲2
▲ Over 86 · Q2
Projected
19–33
✓ CLEM won
Trend: APP ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: CLEM by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #29
34
1-0 · #5
37
Spread
ORE -17.5
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
60.5
▲ Over 71 · Q4
Projected
22–40
✓ ORE won
Trend: BOIS ATS ✓ Model: ORE by 3 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #46
16
1-0 · #68
37
Spread
TTU -2.5
✓ WSU W ATS
Total
64.5 ▼1
▼ Under 53
Projected
31–29
✗ TTU lost
Trend: TTU ATS ✗ Model: WSU by 6 ✓ Model: Under 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
30
0-1 · #84
46
Spread
FRES -18.5
✓ SAC W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼1
▲ Over 76 · Q3
Projected
19–37
✓ FRES won
Trend: FRES ATS ✗ Model: SAC by 5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
1-0 · #95
30
1-0 · #130
24
Spread
LIB -22.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼3
▼ Under 54
Projected
39–20
✓ LIB won
Trend: LIB ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: NMSU by 14.5 ✓ Model: Over 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #72
23
1-0 · #18
30
Spread
ASU -6.5
✓ ASU W ATS
Total
57.5 ▼1
▼ Under 53
Projected
19–25
✓ ASU won
Trend: ASU ATS ✓ Model: MSST by 2 ✗ Model: Under 12.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #98
21
1-0 · #122
0
Spread
ORST -5.5
✓ ORST W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼1
▼ Under 21
Projected
29–23
✓ ORST won
Model: ORST by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #106
0
USC
1-0 · #16
48
Spread
USC -30.5
✓ USC W ATS
Total
62.5 ▲1
▼ Under 48
Projected
19–48
✓ USC won
Trend: USC ATS ✓ Model: USU by 5.5 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total