Week in numbers
Tap a number to filter the games below
Totals moved 1+ ptTap to filter
Did the team the spread moved toward cover? ATS vs the closing line, by how far it moved
| Moved toward | This week | 2024 | 2024–2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Any move | 324–33549% | 789–801–850% | |
| 1.5+ pts | 192–19749% | 446–443–450% | |
| 3+ pts | 76–8348% | 215–206–251% | |
| 5+ pts | 15–1944% | 47–4551% | |
| 7+ pts | — | 4–544% | 13–765% |
Covered–didn’t–push; % leaves out pushes and is grey under 10 games; green or red from 10 games. ClickTap a row or count to filter.
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Jump to
Tuesday, Oct 15
3Final · Conf
Spread
USA -8.5
✓ USA W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼5
▼ Under 34
Projected
23–32
✓ USA won
Final · Conf
Spread
MTSU -10.5
✓ KENN W ATS
Total
50.5
▼ Under 19
Projected
20–30
✓ MTSU won
Final · Conf
Spread
LT -12.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
48.5 ▲1
▲ Over 63 · OT
Projected
29–17
✗ LT lost
Wednesday, Oct 16
2Final · Conf
Spread
SHSU -1.5
✓ WKU W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲1
▼ Under 45
Projected
25–27
✗ SHSU lost
Final · Conf
Spread
FIU -6.5
✓ UTEP W ATS
Total
47.5 ▼3
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
25–20
✗ FIU lost
Thursday, Oct 17
2Final · Conf
Spread
MRSH -8.5
✓ MRSH W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼3
▲ Over 55 · Q4
Projected
21–29
✓ MRSH won
Final · Conf
Spread
VT -8.5
✓ VT W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼4
▲ Over 63 · Q3
Projected
20–28
✓ VT won
Friday, Oct 18
4Final · Conf
Spread
DUKE -2.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
41.5 ▼1
▼ Under 39
Projected
20–22
✓ DUKE won
Final · Conf
Spread
BYU -7.5
✓ OKST W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼3
▲ Over 73 · Q4
Projected
23–32
✓ BYU won
Final · Conf
Spread
FRES -2.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
49.5 ▼2
▼ Under 45
Projected
26–24
✓ FRES won
Saturday, Oct 19
48Final · Conf
Spread
MIA -4.5
✓ MIA W ATS
Total
60.5 ▼1
▲ Over 97 · Q3
Projected
32–27
✓ MIA won
Final · Conf
Spread
ARMY -18.5
✓ ECU W ATS
Total
54.5 ▲3
▲ Over 73 · Q4
Projected
14–33
✓ ARMY won
Final · Conf
Spread
WIS -9.5
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
42.5 ▲2
▼ Under 26
Projected
25–16
✓ WIS won
Final · Non-conf
Spread
WAKE -2.5
✓ WAKE W ATS
Total
56.5 ▼1
▼ Under 43
Projected
30–29
✓ WAKE won
Final · Conf
Spread
CIN -4.5
✓ CIN W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼3
▼ Under 38
Projected
26–30
✓ CIN won
Final · Conf
Spread
UL -6.5
✓ UL W ATS
Total
56.5 ▲1
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
30–25
✓ UL won
Final · Conf
Spread
SC -2.5
✓ SC W ATS
Total
40.5 ▼1
▲ Over 44 · Q3
Projected
22–21
✓ SC won
Final · Conf
Spread
EMU -3.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼2
▲ Over 72 · Q4
Projected
25–28
✓ EMU won
Final · Neutral
Spread
ND -14.5
✓ ND W ATS
Total
49.5 ▼1
▼ Under 44
Projected
34–20
✓ ND won
Final · Conf
Spread
CAL -9.5
✓ NCSU W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼1
▲ Over 47 · Q4
Projected
18–29
✗ CAL lost
Final · Non-conf
Spread
WSU -18.5
✓ WSU W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼1
▼ Under 52
Projected
18–37
✓ WSU won
Final · Conf
Spread
TXST -10.5
✓ ODU W ATS
Total
59.5 ▼2
▼ Under 38
Projected
33–23
✗ TXST lost
Final · Conf
Spread
M-OH -3.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
42.5 ▼1
▲ Over 50 · Q4
Projected
20–24
✓ M-OH won
Final · Conf
Spread
BGSU -23.5
✓ KENT W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼3
▼ Under 33
Projected
16–41
✓ BGSU won
Final · Conf
Spread
WMU -1.5
✓ WMU W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼1
▲ Over 89 · Q3
Projected
26–25
✓ WMU won
Final · Conf
Spread
NIU -3.5
✓ TOL W ATS
Total
42.5 ▼3
▼ Under 19
Projected
21–25
✗ NIU lost
Final · Conf
Spread
USF -14.5
✓ UAB W ATS
Total
56.5 ▼1
▲ Over 60 · Q4
Projected
21–35
✓ USF won
Final · Conf
Spread
UTSA -4.5
✓ UTSA W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼4
▲ Over 62 · Q4
Projected
23–28
✓ UTSA won
Final · Conf
Spread
TTU -4.5
✓ BAY W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼2
▲ Over 94 · Q3
Projected
23–29
✗ TTU lost
Final · Conf
Spread
UNM -0.5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
77.5
▲ Over 95 · Q4
Projected
38–38
✓ UNM won
Final · Conf
Spread
SJSU -11.5
✓ WYO W ATS
Total
52.5 ▲3
▼ Under 38
Projected
20–31
✓ SJSU won
Final · Conf
Spread
JMU -8.5
✓ GASO W ATS
Total
57.5 ▼3
▼ Under 42
Projected
33–23
✗ JMU lost
Final · Conf
Spread
TA&M -21.5
✓ MSST W ATS
Total
55.5
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
38–17
✓ TA&M won
Final · Non-conf
Spread
VAN -27.5
✓ BALL W ATS
Total
56.5 ▼2
▼ Under 38
Projected
15–43
✓ VAN won
Final · Conf
Spread
ARST -7
✓ ARST W ATS
Total
56.5 ▲3
▲ Over 72 · Q3
Projected
31–24
✓ ARST won
Final · Conf
Spread
ISU -13.5
✓ UCF W ATS
Total
49.5 ▲2
▲ Over 73 · Q3
Projected
18–31
✓ ISU won
Final · Conf
Spread
KSU -2.5
✓ KSU W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲2
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
30–27
✓ KSU won
Final · Conf
Spread
IOWA -6.5
✓ MSU W ATS
Total
39.5 ▼2
▲ Over 52 · Q4
Projected
23–16
✗ IOWA lost
Final · Conf
Spread
MEM -10.5
✓ UNT W ATS
Total
67.5 ▲1
▲ Over 96 · Q4
Projected
28–38
✓ MEM won
Final · Conf
Spread
CSU -5.5
✓ CSU W ATS
Total
44.5 ▼3
▼ Under 34
Projected
24–18
✓ CSU won
Final · Non-conf
Spread
UNLV -6.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
61.5
▼ Under 58
Projected
32–26
✓ UNLV won
Loading…
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Move | Total | Model | Signal | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||||||
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total