Sat, Oct 19, 2024, 8:00 PM EDTWeek 8 · at Air Force · Conference game
Weather at kickoff52°F9 mphgusts 19DryWeather watch ›
3-3 · Power #100
21
▲ winner
Final
@
1-5 · Power #108
13
final
Closing spread
CSU -5.5
✓ CSU W
Total
44.5
▼ Under · 34 pts
Model before kickoff
CSU 24–18 AFA
✓ CSU (66%) won
Closing line · ESPN BET
SourceESPN BET closing line
OpenCSU -7.5
CloseCSU -5.5
Total47.5 → 44.5
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.
Loading the recap…

Market

Open → close
Spread
2 pts toward Air Force
Total
Down 3 since the open
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened CSU -7.5 · closed CSU -5.5 · moved 2 toward AFAmodel CSU -6
Opened 47.5 · closed 44.5 · moved 3 downmodel 41.5
Openline modelKickoff
Line context
Road favorites of 4.5–6.5 since 2023: won 59%, covered 47% (68 games)ⓘ
Crossed 7Lines that moved 2–3 pts toward the underdog: that team covered 49% (63 games since 2024)ⓘ
Closing line · ESPN BET
SourceESPN BET closing line
OpenCSU -7.5
CloseCSU -5.5
Total47.5 → 44.5
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.

Similar games

The recent games that looked most like this one before kickoff, and how they turned out

In the 10 games most like CSU as a 5.5-point road favorite at AFA, the favorite won 3, covered 3, and 6 went over the total.

Compare by
Customize filters
Only include
Show up to
games
This game: CSU won 21–13; the favorite covered, as in 3 of the 10 similar games. 34 points stayed under 44.5, as in 4 of 10.
Favorite won
3 of 1030%
Below normal · usually 62%
Favorite covered
3 of 1030%
Normal range · usually 48%
Went over
6 of 1060%
Normal range · usually 48%

Wins below normal. Splits like this often fade, so treat it as context, not a pick. Average result: underdog by 1.8 against an average line of 5.2; 54.4 points a game (usually 53.1). Of the 2 overs, 2 had cashed by the end of Q3. When games like this go over ›

All 10 games
MatchGameLineFinalCoveredO/U
Very close
2023 · Week 8 · very close · similar rest & situation
-6.524–6 W U44
Very close
M-OH @ BGSU
2022 · Week 7 · very close · similar rest & total
-713–17 L U45
Very close
TLSA @ NAVY
2022 · Week 6 · very close · similar situation & rest
-4.521–53 L O45.75
Very close
USF @ TEM
2022 · Week 10 · very close · similar rest & team ratings
-3.528–54 L O49
Very close
2023 · Week 6 · very close · similar rest & situation
-455–14 W O42.5
Close
FRES @ UNM
2022 · Week 8 · close · similar situation & rest
-9.7541–9 W O40.25
Close
2023 · Week 8 · close · similar rest & situation
-517–24 L U42
Close
LT @ RICE
2021 · Week 13 · close · similar rest & season form
-431–35 L O52.5
Close
2023 · Week 11 · close · similar rest & situation
-3.56–31 L U52
Close
2023 · Week 9 · close · similar rest & spread
-4.527–38 L O49
History, not a prediction. Every FBS game from 2021 on is compared with this one as it looked before kickoff (team strength, the betting line, season form, situation, venue and rest), and only close matches are kept. How matches are found

Signals

The data signal, and 5 trends and market moves behind it
Moderate Colorado State ATS trend Hit
Moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) in our 2023–26 backtest.
Slight Under trend Hit
Slight-or-stronger total leans went 509-553 (48%) in our 2023–26 backtest.

None of these signals has beaten the market in our backtest, so this describes why the matchup is interesting — it isn’t a pick.

Air Force ATS struggles (0-6)
Air Force have covered only 0% of their games with a line this season. · Backtest 2023–26: 262-295 (47%)
Air Force home ATS weakness (0-3)
Weak against the spread at home this season. · Backtest 2023–26: 216-236 (48%)
Air Force 0-3 ATS as an underdog
Struggling to cover in the role they have in this game. · Backtest 2023–26: 221-216 (51%)
Market moved toward Air Force
2 pts (CSU -7.5 → CSU -5.5), through the key number 7. · Backtest 2024–26: 446-443 (50%)
Total moved down 3
47.5 → 44.5. · Backtest 2024–26: 462-498 (48%)
Loading play-by-play…

Matchup stats

Season to date before kickoff · ranks among 137 FBS teams
Power rating this season
pts vs an average team · #rank · tap a dot
CSU−8.3 →−8.9▼ 0.6#102
AFA−9.1 →−17.6▼ 8.5#126
Predashed line = average team · hover or tap a dotW7

CSU
Longer bar = better
AFA
#86
Offense
◀ CSU better
#132
#97
Defense
Even
#99
−0.8 #112
Turnovers
AFA better ▶
0.0 #78
66 plays #75
Pace
◀ CSU faster
65 plays #90
Unit by unitEach offense against the other's defense
When CSU has the ball
Even matchup
CSU offAFA defEdge
Points / game 22.7 #107 28.5 #95 Even
Yards / play 5.59 #88 6.11 #108 Even
PPA / play +0.05 #106 +0.16 #102 Even
Success rate 46% #43 43% #92 CSU
When AFA has the ball
Advantage: CSU defense
AFA offCSU defEdge
Points / game 15.7 #134 29.5 #100 CSU
Yards / play 4.42 #133 5.95 #94 CSU
PPA / play −0.09 #133 +0.12 #85 CSU
Success rate 36% #128 44% #109 Even

Points by quarter and half

Per game this season before kickoff · ranks among 134 FBS teams
CSU scoring against the AFA defense
Q1Q21HQ3Q42H
CSU scored
5.7
#82
5.2
#117
10.8
#104
4.0
#107
6.7
#79
10.7
#105
AFA allowed
7.5
#112
5.2
#34
12.7
#72
9.0
#126
6.8
#78
15.8
#118
AFA scoring against the CSU defense
Q1Q21HQ3Q42H
AFA scored
2.8
#124
7.3
#90
10.2
#106
0.0
#134
5.5
#100
5.5
#131
CSU allowed
3.5
#38
10.3
#115
13.8
#87
5.8
#71
7.3
#96
13.2
#87

Game conditions

At kickoff
Home field
AFA +2.5
home-field points in the model
Weather
52° · 9 mph
gusts 19 mph · at kickoff
Rest
CSU7d
AFA7d
Even
Tempo
Average 131 plays
slowavg 133fast
Altitude
CSU +1,641 ft
moderate climb
Quarterback
AFA backup QB started
Not the usual starter