FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 13: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games6262 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS30-3248% covered
Upsets20outright
Over / Under36-2658% over
Model Favorite42-2068% won
Did the team the spread moved toward cover? ATS vs the closing line, by how far it moved
Moved towardThis week20242024–2026
Any move
23–3043%
324–33549%
789–801–850%
1.5+ pts
9–950%
192–19749%
446–443–450%
3+ pts
3–350%
76–8348%
215–206–251%
5+ pts
—
15–1944%
47–4551%
7+ pts
—
4–544%
13–765%
Covered–didn’t–push; % leaves out pushes and is grey under 10 games; green or red from 10 games. ClickTap a row or count to filter.
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Tuesday, Nov 19

3
Final · Conf
2-8 · #124
38
0-10 · #134
17
Spread
AKR -10.5
✓ AKR W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼1
▲ Over 55 · Q4
Projected
32–21
✓ AKR won
Trend: AKR ATS ✓ Model: AKR by 0 ✓ Model: Over 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
5-5 · #107
14
3-7 · #123
16
Spread
WMU -5.5
✓ CMU W ATS
Total
54.5
▼ Under 30
Projected
32–27
✗ WMU lost
Trend: CMU ATS ✓ Model: CMU by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-4 · #74
9
6-4 · #73
20
Spread
M-OH -2.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
42.5 ▼1
▼ Under 29
Projected
19–21
✓ M-OH won
Trend: NIU ATS ✗ Model: NIU by 0 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1

Wednesday, Nov 20

2
Final · Conf
6-4 · #105
37
5-5 · #120
20
Spread
EMU -1.5
✓ BUFF W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲4
▲ Over 57 · Q4
Projected
25–27
✗ EMU lost
Trend: EMU ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: EMU by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Ohio
7-3 · #65
24
7-3 · #88
7
Spread
OHIO -0.5
✓ OHIO W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼5
▼ Under 31
Projected
24–24
✓ OHIO won
Trend: OHIO ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: TOL by 2 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4

Thursday, Nov 21

1
Final · Conf
5-5 · #67
29
6-4 · #36
30
Spread
GT -7.5
✓ NCSU W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼4
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
22–30
✓ GT won
Trend: GT ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: GT by 4.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q4

Friday, Nov 22

3
Final · Conf
3-7 · #127
27
UTSA
5-5 · #82
51
Spread
UTSA -17.5
✓ UTSA W ATS
Total
55.5
▲ Over 78 · Q3
Projected
18–36
✓ UTSA won
Trend: UTSA ATS ✓ Model: TEM by 1 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
1-9 · #117
17
4-6 · #70
24
Spread
MSU -14.5
✓ PUR W ATS
Total
50.5 ▲2
▼ Under 41
Projected
17–31
✓ MSU won
Trend: MSU ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: MSU by 0 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
UNLV
8-2 · #42
27
6-4 · #86
16
Spread
UNLV -7.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
59.5 ▼3
▼ Under 43
Projected
32–24
✓ UNLV won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: UNLV by 1 ✓ Model: Under 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q4

Saturday, Nov 23

53
Final · Conf
10-0 · #10
15
9-1 · #1
38
Spread
OSU -10.5
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼1
▲ Over 53 · Q4
Projected
21–31
✓ OSU won
Trend: IU ATS ✗ Model: OSU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
4-6 · #89
14
9-1 · #9
42
Spread
MIA -23.5
✓ MIA W ATS
Total
65.5 ▲1
▼ Under 56
Projected
20–45
✓ MIA won
Model: MIA by 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
8-2 · #3
17
5-5 · #21
24
Spread
MISS -13.5
✓ FLA W ATS
Total
57.5 ▲2
▼ Under 41
Projected
34–21
✗ MISS lost
Trend: MISS ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: MISS by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
SMU
9-1 · #15
33
5-5 · #77
7
Spread
SMU -10.5
✓ SMU W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼5
▼ Under 40
Projected
32–21
✓ SMU won
Trend: UVA ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: SMU by 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
7-3 · #44
38
6-4 · #51
31
Spread
RUTG -2.5
✓ ILL W ATS
Total
47.5 ▲1
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
22–24
✗ RUTG lost
Model: ILL by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Iowa
6-4 · #30
29
4-6 · #62
13
Spread
IOWA -4.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
39.5 ▼6
▲ Over 42 · Q4
Projected
25–20
✓ IOWA won
Trend: MD ATS ✗ Model: MD by 0 ✗ Model: Over 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
7-3 · #80
24
7-3 · #43
31
Spread
SYR -9.5
✓ CONN W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼1
▲ Over 55 · Q4
Projected
22–32
✓ SYR won
Trend: CONN ATS ✓ Model: SYR by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-4 · #64
21
5-5 · #58
41
Spread
UNC -1.5
✓ BC W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼6
▲ Over 62 · Q4
Projected
28–26
✗ UNC lost
Trend: Under ✗ Model: UNC by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-2 · #93
11
7-3 · #81
21
Spread
JXST -5.5
✓ JXST W ATS
Total
57.5 ▲2
▼ Under 32
Projected
26–31
✓ JXST won
Trend: Over ✗ Model: SHSU by 2 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
2-8 · #125
21
8-2 · #8
59
Spread
UGA -42.5
✓ MASS W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼1
▲ Over 80 · Q3
Projected
3–46
✓ UGA won
Trend: MASS ATS ✓ Model: UGA by 3 ✗ Model: Under 6.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
UTEP
2-8 · #128
0
8-2 · #11
56
Spread
TENN -41.5
✓ TENN W ATS
Total
54.5 ▲1
▲ Over 56 · Q4
Projected
5–47
✓ TENN won
Model: TENN by 2.5 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
7-3 · #103
21
7-2 · #95
38
Spread
LIB -1.5
✓ LIB W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼1
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
27–28
✓ LIB won
Trend: WKU ATS ✗ Model: LIB by 2 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
6-4 · #75
38
3-7 · #126
13
Spread
BGSU -12.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼4
▼ Under 51
Projected
33–20
✓ BGSU won
Trend: BALL ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: BGSU by 2 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Rice
3-7 · #104
14
UAB
2-8 · #116
40
Spread
RICE -6.5
✓ UAB W ATS
Total
52.5 ▲2
▲ Over 54 · Q4
Projected
30–24
✗ RICE lost
Trend: RICE ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: UAB by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-8 · #130
36
3-7 · #129
21
Spread
MTSU -3.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲3
▲ Over 57 · Q4
Projected
25–29
✗ MTSU lost
Trend: NMSU ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: MTSU by 3.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-2 · #59
20
4-5 · #99
34
Spread
JMU -6.5
✓ APP W ATS
Total
56.5 ▼4
▼ Under 54
Projected
30–23
✗ JMU lost
Trend: Under ✓ Model: JMU by 3.5 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
4-6 · #79
28
TCU
6-4 · #34
49
Spread
TCU -10.5
✓ TCU W ATS
Total
60.5 ▲2
▲ Over 77 · Q4
Projected
24–35
✓ TCU won
Trend: TCU ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: ARIZ by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
3-7 · #121
26
1-9 · #133
27
Spread
FIU -8.5
✓ KENN W ATS
Total
41.5 ▼2
▲ Over 53 · Q3
Projected
25–16
✗ FIU lost
Trend: FIU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: KENN by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
5-5 · #115
21
6-4 · #113
28
Spread
ARST -2.5
✓ ARST W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼1
▼ Under 49
Projected
25–28
✓ ARST won
Model: ARST by 0 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
5-5 · #66
35
1-9 · #132
14
Spread
USA -24.5
✓ USM W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼1
▼ Under 49
Projected
39–15
✓ USA won
Model: USM by 2.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-7 · #119
39
2-8 · #118
27
Spread
CLT -3.5
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
49.5 ▲2
▲ Over 66 · Q4
Projected
27–24
✓ CLT won
Trend: CLT ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: FAU by 4.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-6 · #50
14
9-1 · #2
31
Spread
TEX -18.5
✓ UK W ATS
Total
46.5
▼ Under 45
Projected
13–32
✓ TEX won
Trend: UK ATS ✓ Model: TEX by 5 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
9-1 · #6
26
6-4 · #26
25
Spread
PSU -11.5
✓ MINN W ATS
Total
45.5
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
27–16
✓ PSU won
Model: MINN by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
BYU
9-1 · #22
23
8-2 · #18
28
Spread
ASU -3.5
✓ ASU W ATS
Total
48.5
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
23–26
✓ ASU won
Trend: ASU ATS ✓ Model: BYU by 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-2 · #25
21
4-6 · #35
37
Spread
COLO -1.5
✓ KU W ATS
Total
59.5
▼ Under 58
Projected
29–28
✗ COLO lost
Trend: COLO ATS ✗ Model: KU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-6 · #83
6
5-5 · #27
50
Spread
MICH -10.5
✓ MICH W ATS
Total
34.5 ▼4
▲ Over 56 · Q3
Projected
12–23
✓ MICH won
Trend: NU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: MICH by 2 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
5-5 · #47
25
5-5 · #41
44
Spread
NEB -1.5
✓ NEB W ATS
Total
40.5 ▼2
▲ Over 69 · Q3
Projected
20–21
✓ NEB won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: WIS by 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
3-7 · #96
21
5-5 · #55
24
Spread
CAL -15.5
✓ STAN W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼3
▼ Under 45
Projected
17–33
✓ CAL won
Trend: CAL ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: CAL by 1 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-4 · #46
56
3-7 · #87
48
Spread
TTU -4.5
✓ TTU W ATS
Total
62.5 ▼6
▲ Over 104 · Q3
Projected
33–29
✓ TTU won
Trend: TTU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: TTU by 0 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UCF
4-6 · #37
21
5-5 · #63
31
Spread
UCF -3.5
✓ WVU W ATS
Total
60.5 ▼4
▼ Under 52
Projected
31–27
✗ UCF lost
Trend: UCF ATS ✗ Model: UCF by 0 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-7 · #122
20
3-7 · #106
41
Spread
USU -4.5
✓ USU W ATS
Total
59.5 ▼3
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
27–32
✓ USU won
Trend: USU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: USU by 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
6-4 · #90
26
5-5 · #101
6
Spread
CCU -1.5
✓ GASO W ATS
Total
59.5 ▲3
▼ Under 32
Projected
29–31
✗ CCU lost
Trend: GASO ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: CCU by 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-4 · #92
40
5-5 · #94
28
Spread
UNT -2.5
✓ ECU W ATS
Total
73.5 ▲1
▼ Under 68
Projected
31–34
✗ UNT lost
Model: UNT by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 7.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
3-7 · #131
30
5-5 · #91
63
Spread
USF -13.5
✓ USF W ATS
Total
60.5 ▲1
▲ Over 93 · Q4
Projected
21–36
✓ USF won
Trend: TLSA ATS ✗ Model: USF by 5 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
4-6 · #112
14
5-5 · #32
35
Spread
ARK -23.5
✓ LT W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼2
▲ Over 49 · Q4
Projected
12–35
✓ ARK won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: ARK by 1 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-3 · #57
9
6-4 · #14
37
Spread
LOU -7.5
✓ LOU W ATS
Total
57.5 ▲1
▼ Under 46
Projected
25–32
✓ LOU won
Model: LOU by 2 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-3 · #23
39
2-8 · #72
20
Spread
MIZ -9.5
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
57.5 ▲1
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
34–24
✓ MIZ won
Trend: MIZ ATS ✓ Model: MIZ by 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Troy
3-7 · #97
30
8-2 · #71
51
Spread
UL -7.5
✓ UL W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼2
▲ Over 81 · Q3
Projected
22–31
✓ UL won
Trend: TROY ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: UL by 4.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Neutral
Army
9-0 · #52
14
9-1 · #4
49
Spread
ND -14.5
✓ ND W ATS
Total
44.5 ▲1
▲ Over 63 · Q3
Projected
14–29
✓ ND won
Trend: ARMY ATS ✗ Model: ND by 3 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
9-1 · #29
17
2-8 · #114
13
Spread
BOIS -25.5
✓ WYO W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼3
▼ Under 30
Projected
40–15
✓ BOIS won
Trend: BOIS ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: WYO by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-2 · #68
38
4-6 · #98
41
Spread
WSU -10.5
✓ ORST W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼1
▲ Over 79 · Q4
Projected
35–24
✗ WSU lost
Model: ORST by 2 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-4 · #39
20
4-6 · #76
10
Spread
BAY -6.5
✓ BAY W ATS
Total
50.5
▼ Under 30
Projected
27–21
✓ BAY won
Trend: BAY ATS ✓ Model: HOU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
2-8 · #110
52
6-4 · #54
44
Spread
TXST -22.5
✓ GAST W ATS
Total
59.5 ▲1
▲ Over 96 · Q3
Projected
17–40
✗ TXST lost
Trend: TXST ATS ✗ Model: GAST by 1 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-2 · #7
3
5-5 · #28
24
Spread
ALA -14.5
✓ OU W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼1
▼ Under 27
Projected
30–16
✗ ALA lost
Model: OU by 2 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-2 · #19
41
4-6 · #33
43
Spread
TA&M -2.5
✓ AUB W ATS
Total
47.5 ▲1
▲ Over 84 · Q3
Projected
25–23
✗ TA&M lost
Trend: AUB ATS ✓ Model: AUB by 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-2 · #24
31
Utah
4-6 · #49
28
Spread
ISU -3.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
Total
42.5
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
22–18
✓ ISU won
Trend: UTAH ATS ✓ Model: ISU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
7-3 · #69
42
4-6 · #78
35
Spread
ODU -2.5
✓ MRSH W ATS
Total
51.5
▲ Over 77 · Q3
Projected
24–27
✗ ODU lost
Trend: MRSH ATS ✓ Model: ODU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-4 · #53
17
LSU
6-4 · #12
24
Spread
LSU -9.5
✓ VAN W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼2
▼ Under 41
Projected
23–34
✓ LSU won
Trend: VAN ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: LSU by 5 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
5-5 · #38
28
Duke
7-3 · #60
31
Spread
VT -2.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼2
▲ Over 59 · Q3
Projected
24–21
✗ VT lost
Trend: DUKE ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: VT by 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-5 · #45
15
7-3 · #20
41
Spread
KSU -7.5
✓ KSU W ATS
Total
54.5 ▲2
▲ Over 56 · Q4
Projected
22–30
✓ KSU won
Trend: CIN ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: KSU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
USC
5-5 · #16
19
UCLA
4-6 · #48
13
Spread
USC -4.5
✓ USC W ATS
Total
52.5 ▲2
▼ Under 32
Projected
29–24
✓ USC won
Trend: UCLA ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: USC by 4 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
3-7 · #108
22
3-8 · #102
19
Spread
NEV -2.5
✓ AFA W ATS
Total
44.5
▼ Under 41
Projected
19–23
✗ NEV lost
Trend: NEV ATS ✗ Model: NEV by 5.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
7-3 · #100
22
5-5 · #84
28
Spread
FRES -3.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
42.5 ▼5
▲ Over 50 · Q4
Projected
22–26
✓ FRES won
Trend: CSU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: FRES by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total