Sat, Nov 23, 2024, 2:00 PM ESTWeek 13 · at UAB · Conference game
Closing spread
RICE -6.5
✓ UAB W
Total
52.5
▲ Over · 54 pts
Model before kickoff
RICE 30–24 UAB
✗ RICE (66%) lost
Closing line · ESPN BET
SourceESPN BET closing line
OpenRICE -7
CloseRICE -6.5
Total50.5 → 52.5
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenRICE -7
0.5 → UAB
CloseRICE -6.5
0.5 pts toward UAB
Total
Open50.5
▲ 2
Close52.5
Up 2 since the open
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened RICE -7 · closed RICE -6.5 · moved 0.5 toward UABmodel RICE -4
model RICE -4
Opened 50.5 · closed 52.5 · moved 2 upmodel 53.5
model 53.5
Openline modelKickoff
Line context
Road favorites of 5.5–7.5 since 2023: won 68%, covered 58% (103 games)ⓘ
Moved off 7The team the line moved toward covered 67% (21 games since 2024)ⓘ
Closing line · ESPN BET
SourceESPN BET closing line
OpenRICE -7
CloseRICE -6.5
Total50.5 → 52.5
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.
Similar games
The recent games that looked most like this one before kickoff, and how they turned out
In the 10 games most like
RICE as a 6.5-point road favorite at UAB, the favorite won 4, covered 1, and 8 went over the total.
Compare by
Customize filters
Only include
Show up togames
This game: UAB won 40–14 outright; the favorite didn’t cover, as in 9 of the 10 similar games. 54 points went over 52.5, as in 8 of 10.
Favorite won
4 of 1040%
Normal range · usually 66%
Favorite covered
1 of 1010%
Below normal · usually 50%
Went over
8 of 1080%
Normal range · usually 49%
Covers below normal. Splits like this often fade, so treat it as context, not a pick. Average result: underdog by 2.5 against an average line of 5.3; 61.1 points a game (usually 53.7). Of the 5 overs, 2 had cashed by the end of Q3. When games like this go over ›
All 10 games
| Match | Game | Line | Final | Covered | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very close | 2021 · Week 10 · very close · similar situation & spread |
-7 | 33–35 | L | O54.5 |
| Very close |
2023 · Week 13 · very close · similar spread & season form |
-5.5 | 24–27 | L | U53.75 |
| Very close |
2023 · Week 10 · very close · similar situation & season form |
-4.75 | 31–37 | L | O48 |
| Very close | 2021 · Week 6 · very close · similar spread & situation |
-5 | 30–27 | L | U57.5 |
| Very close |
2023 · Week 7 · very close · similar spread & team ratings |
-6 | 41–34 | W | O52 |
| Close |
2024 · Week 7 · close · similar total & situation |
-3 | 27–25 | L | O50.5 |
| Close | 2022 · Week 11 · close · similar situation & season form |
-6.25 | 34–28 | L | O57.25 |
| Close |
2024 · Week 10 · close · similar rest & situation |
-4 | 24–38 | L | O51.5 |
| Close |
2023 · Week 10 · close · similar spread & situation |
-7 | 18–32 | L | O46 |
| Close | 2021 · Week 13 · close · similar situation & season form |
-4 | 31–35 | L | O52.5 |
History, not a prediction. Every FBS game from 2021 on is compared with this one as it looked before kickoff (team strength, the betting line, season form, situation, venue and rest), and only close matches are kept. How matches are found
Signals
The data signal, and 2 trends and market moves behind it
Slight Rice ATS trend Miss
Slight-or-stronger ATS leans went 873-886 (50%) in our 2023–26 backtest.
Slight Over trend Hit
Slight-or-stronger total leans went 509-553 (48%) in our 2023–26 backtest.
None of these signals has beaten the market in our backtest, so this describes why the matchup is interesting — it isn’t a pick.
UAB 1-5 ATS as an underdog
Struggling to cover in the role they have in this game. · Backtest 2023–26: 221-216 (51%)
Total moved up 2
50.5 → 52.5. · Backtest 2024–26: 462-498 (48%)
Totals
Over/under before kickoff
Went over in Q4. Of 350 earlier overs in games with totals 48.5–56.5, 35% had cashed by the end of Q3.
When games like this go over ›Last 10 games
Before kickoff, this and last season
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 2-8 20% | 3-6 33% | 6-3 67% |
Matchup stats
Season to date before kickoff · ranks among 137 FBS teams
Power rating this season
pts vs an average team · #rank · tap a dot
RICE−5.5 →−7.8▼ 2.3#102
UAB−6.4 →−13.8▼ 7.4#121
Predashed line = average team · hover or tap a dotW12
Longer bar = better
#117
Offense
UAB better ▶#87
#33
Defense
◀ RICE better#117
−0.8 #122
Turnovers
◀ RICE better−1.5 #136
62 plays #117
Pace
UAB faster ▶70 plays #25
Unit by unitEach offense against the other's defense
| RICE off | UAB def | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Points / game | 21.7 #114 | 36.8 #128 | Even |
| Yards / play | 5.37 #100 | 5.86 #94 | Even |
| PPA / play | −0.01 #122 | +0.25 #125 | Even |
| Success rate | 35% #131 | 47% #122 | Even |
| UAB off | RICE def | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Points / game | 24.7 #95 | 23.7 #62 | RICE |
| Yards / play | 5.56 #83 | 4.83 #21 | RICE |
| PPA / play | +0.02 #116 | +0.06 #46 | RICE |
| Success rate | 44% #55 | 35% #4 | RICE |
Points by quarter and half
Per game this season before kickoff · ranks among 134 FBS teams
RICE scoring against the UAB defense
| Q1 | Q2 | 1H | Q3 | Q4 | 2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.7 #114 | 6.7 #106 | 10.4 #114 | 5.5 #76 | 5.8 #101 | 11.3 #99 | |
7.0 #108 | 9.3 #99 | 16.3 #109 | 8.7 #122 | 11.8 #133 | 20.5 #134 |
UAB scoring against the RICE defense
| Q1 | Q2 | 1H | Q3 | Q4 | 2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.3 #54 | 8.5 #59 | 14.8 #59 | 4.0 #113 | 5.9 #98 | 9.9 #114 | |
4.1 #44 | 7.5 #68 | 11.6 #54 | 4.9 #49 | 7.2 #84 | 12.1 #65 |
Game conditions
At kickoff
Home field
home-field points in the model
Weather
55° · 4 mph
gusts 13 mph · at kickoff
Rest
RICE15d bye
UAB7d
RICE +8 days
Tempo
Average 133 plays
slowavg 134fast
Schedules, links & other games
Previous and next games, standings, ESPN, and the rest of the week

