FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 7: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games5252 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS24-2846% covered
Upsets13outright
Over / Under28-2454% over
Model Favorite39-1375% won
Did the team the spread moved toward cover? ATS vs the closing line, by how far it moved
Moved towardThis week20242024–2026
Any move
19–2246%
324–33549%
789–801–850%
1.5+ pts
9–1145%
192–19749%
446–443–450%
3+ pts
7–278%
76–8348%
215–206–251%
5+ pts
—
15–1944%
47–4551%
7+ pts
—
4–544%
13–765%
Covered–didn’t–push; % leaves out pushes and is grey under 10 games; green or red from 10 games. ClickTap a row or count to filter.
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Tuesday, Oct 8

1
Final · Conf
2-3 · #121
24
4-0 · #95
31
Spread
LIB -15.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲2
▼ Under 55
Projected
19–35
✓ LIB won
Trend: FIU ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: LIB by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1

Wednesday, Oct 9

1
Final · Conf
1-4 · #130
13
2-3 · #81
54
Spread
JXST -21.5
✓ JXST W ATS
Total
58.5 ▲1
▲ Over 67 · Q4
Projected
17–38
✓ JXST won
Trend: JXST ATS ✓ Model: NMSU by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q2

Thursday, Oct 10

3
Final · Conf
4-1 · #101
7
4-1 · #59
39
Spread
JMU -6.5
✓ JMU W ATS
Total
58.5
▼ Under 46
Projected
24–32
✓ JMU won
Trend: CCU ATS ✗ Model: JMU by 7 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
1-4 · #129
21
1-3 · #112
48
Spread
LT -4.5
✓ LT W ATS
Total
47.5 ▼1
▲ Over 69 · Q2
Projected
22–27
✓ LT won
Trend: LT ATS ✓ Model: LT by 2 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UTEP
0-5 · #128
17
3-2 · #103
44
Spread
WKU -18.5
✓ WKU W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼2
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
17–35
✓ WKU won
Trend: WKU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: UTEP by 2 ✗ Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4

Friday, Oct 11

3
Final · Conf
2-3 · #83
37
3-2 · #62
10
Spread
MD -10.5
✓ NU W ATS
Total
44.5 ▼1
▲ Over 47 · Q4
Projected
17–29
✗ MD lost
Trend: Over ✓ Model: MD by 6 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UNLV
4-1 · #42
50
1-4 · #106
34
Spread
UNLV -18.5
✓ USU W ATS
Total
66.5 ▲2
▲ Over 84 · Q3
Projected
40–22
✓ UNLV won
Trend: UNLV ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: USU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Utah
4-1 · #49
19
4-1 · #18
27
Spread
UTAH -5.5
✓ ASU W ATS
Total
46.5 ▲1
▼ Under 46
Projected
23–18
✗ UTAH lost
Trend: ASU ATS ✓ Model: ASU by 6 ✓ Model: Under 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1

Saturday, Oct 12

44
Final · Conf
3-2 · #13
25
4-1 · #7
27
Spread
ALA -19.5
✓ SC W ATS
Total
49.5 ▼1
▲ Over 52 · Q4
Projected
15–35
✓ ALA won
Trend: SC ATS ✓ Model: ALA by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-1 · #17
49
2-3 · #89
14
Spread
CLEM -21.5
✓ CLEM W ATS
Total
63.5 ▲3
▼ Under 63
Projected
40–19
✓ CLEM won
Trend: CLEM ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: WAKE by 4 ✗ Model: Under 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
4-1 · #23
45
1-5 · #125
3
Spread
MIZ -27.5
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
53.5
▼ Under 48
Projected
38–11
✓ MIZ won
Model: MASS by 2 ✗ Model: Under 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
4-2 · #31
16
Iowa
3-2 · #30
40
Spread
IOWA -2.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
41.5 ▲1
▲ Over 56 · Q4
Projected
20–22
✓ IOWA won
Trend: WASH ATS ✗ Model: WASH by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-2 · #47
42
4-1 · #51
7
Spread
RUTG -1.5
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
43.5 ▲4
▲ Over 49 · Q4
Projected
20–22
✗ RUTG lost
Trend: RUTG ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: RUTG by 3 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-2 · #36
41
3-3 · #64
34
Spread
GT -3.5
✓ GT W ATS
Total
60.5 ▲3
▲ Over 75 · Q4
Projected
32–29
✓ GT won
Trend: GT ATS ✓ Model: UNC by 2 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
1-4 · #126
37
0-5 · #134
35
Spread
BALL -3.5
✓ KENT W ATS
Total
58.5 ▲1
▲ Over 72 · Q4
Projected
32–28
✓ BALL won
Trend: BALL ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: BALL by 1 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
4-1 · #88
15
3-2 · #105
30
Spread
TOL -10.5
✓ BUFF W ATS
Total
44.5 ▼1
▲ Over 45 · Q4
Projected
29–18
✗ TOL lost
Trend: TOL ATS ✗ Model: TOL by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UAB
1-4 · #116
10
Army
5-0 · #52
44
Spread
ARMY -25.5
✓ ARMY W ATS
Total
55.5
▼ Under 54
Projected
15–39
✓ ARMY won
Trend: ARMY ATS ✓ Model: UAB by 6 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
1-4 · #73
38
4-1 · #120
14
Spread
M-OH -2.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
46.5 ▲1
▲ Over 52 · Q4
Projected
22–20
✓ M-OH won
Trend: EMU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: EMU by 3 ✗ Model: Under 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Neutral
5-0 · #2
34
4-1 · #28
3
Spread
TEX -16.5
✓ TEX W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼6
▼ Under 37
Projected
33–17
✓ TEX won
Trend: TEX ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: OU by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
5-0 · #6
33
USC
3-2 · #16
30
Spread
PSU -3.5
✓ USC W ATS
Total
51.5 ▲3
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
27–24
✓ PSU won
Trend: USC ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: USC by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
2-3 · #96
7
4-1 · #4
49
Spread
ND -22.5
✓ ND W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼1
▲ Over 56 · Q3
Projected
12–35
✓ ND won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: ND by 6.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
3-2 · #55
15
5-0 · #57
17
Spread
PITT -3.5
✓ CAL W ATS
Total
56.5 ▼3
▼ Under 32
Projected
26–30
✓ PITT won
Trend: PITT ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: PITT by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
1-4 · #117
49
4-1 · #44
50
Spread
ILL -21.5
✓ PUR W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼3
▲ Over 99 · Q3
Projected
15–36
✓ ILL won
Trend: ILL ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: PUR by 3 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-2 · #14
24
4-1 · #77
20
Spread
LOU -7.5
✓ UVA W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼5
▼ Under 44
Projected
31–22
✓ LOU won
Trend: LOU ATS ✗ Model: LOU by 5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-2 · #45
19
UCF
3-2 · #37
13
Spread
UCF -2.5
✓ CIN W ATS
Total
57.5 ▼2
▼ Under 32
Projected
28–31
✗ UCF lost
Trend: CIN ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: UCF by 3 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-1 · #86
24
2-3 · #100
31
Spread
CSU -2.5
✓ CSU W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼1
▲ Over 55 · Q4
Projected
25–27
✓ CSU won
Trend: CSU ATS ✓ Model: SJSU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
2-3 · #122
27
1-4 · #114
24
Spread
WYO -1.5
✓ SDSU W ATS
Total
41.5 ▼1
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
22–24
✗ WYO lost
Trend: WYO ATS ✗ Model: WYO by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-4 · #78
21
2-2 · #110
14
Spread
GAST -2.5
✓ ODU W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼1
▼ Under 35
Projected
24–26
✗ GAST lost
Model: ODU by 3 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-5 · #124
24
2-3 · #107
34
Spread
WMU -9.5
✓ WMU W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼5
▲ Over 58 · Q3
Projected
23–33
✓ WMU won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: WMU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 7.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
3-2 · #74
17
2-3 · #75
7
Spread
BGSU -3.5
✓ NIU W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼1
▼ Under 24
Projected
22–26
✗ BGSU lost
Model: BGSU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
4-1 · #56
21
2-3 · #91
3
Spread
MEM -10.5
✓ MEM W ATS
Total
58.5 ▼2
▼ Under 24
Projected
35–25
✓ MEM won
Trend: MEM ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: USF by 4 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-2 · #79
19
BYU
5-0 · #22
41
Spread
BYU -2.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼2
▲ Over 60 · Q4
Projected
24–27
✓ BYU won
Trend: BYU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: BYU by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Ohio
3-2 · #65
27
3-2 · #123
25
Spread
OHIO -2.5
✓ CMU W ATS
Total
49.5 ▲2
▲ Over 52 · Q4
Projected
27–24
✓ OHIO won
Trend: Over ✓ Model: OHIO by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
1-4 · #72
31
4-1 · #8
41
Spread
UGA -34.5
✓ MSST W ATS
Total
54.5 ▲1
▲ Over 72 · Q3
Projected
11–45
✓ UGA won
Trend: MSST ATS ✓ Model: MSST by 2 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-4 · #132
21
4-1 · #115
38
Spread
ULM -4.5
✓ ULM W ATS
Total
41.5
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
19–25
✓ ULM won
Trend: ULM ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: ULM by 5 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
3-2 · #21
17
4-1 · #11
23
Spread
TENN -13.5
✓ FLA W ATS
Total
54.5
▼ Under 40
Projected
20–35
✓ TENN won
Trend: TENN ATS ✗ Model: TENN by 6.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-4 · #108
37
1-4 · #111
52
Spread
UNM -6.5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
54.5
▲ Over 89 · Q3
Projected
24–30
✓ UNM won
Trend: UNM ATS ✓ Model: AFA by 0 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
4-1 · #68
25
3-2 · #84
17
Spread
WSU -3.5
✓ WSU W ATS
Total
60.5 ▼1
▼ Under 42
Projected
30–27
✓ WSU won
Model: WSU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
3-2 · #113
9
3-2 · #54
41
Spread
TXST -13.5
✓ TXST W ATS
Total
66.5 ▲3
▼ Under 50
Projected
23–37
✓ TXST won
Trend: Over ✗ Model: TXST by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 6.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
4-1 · #94
41
2-3 · #118
37
Spread
UNT -5.5
✓ FAU W ATS
Total
58.5 ▼1
▲ Over 78 · Q3
Projected
32–27
✓ UNT won
Model: FAU by 2 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
UTSA
2-3 · #82
27
Rice
1-4 · #104
29
Spread
UTSA -3.5
✓ RICE W ATS
Total
51.5 ▲4
▲ Over 56 · Q4
Projected
26–23
✗ UTSA lost
Trend: RICE ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: RICE by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-0 · #1
31
5-0 · #5
32
Spread
OSU -3.5
✓ ORE W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼1
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
30–27
✗ OSU lost
Model: ORE by 1 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
5-1 · #3
26
LSU
4-1 · #12
29
Spread
MISS -3.5
✓ LSU W ATS
Total
64.5
▼ Under 55
Projected
34–30
✗ MISS lost
Trend: MISS ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: MISS by 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
4-1 · #98
37
2-4 · #102
42
Spread
ORST -2.5
✓ NEV W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼3
▲ Over 79 · Q4
Projected
27–24
✗ ORST lost
Trend: NEV ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: ORST by 2 ✗ Model: Over 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
2-3 · #99
24
4-1 · #71
34
Spread
UL -10.5
✓ APP W ATS
Total
63.5 ▼1
▼ Under 58
Projected
26–37
✓ UL won
Trend: UL ATS ✗ Model: UL by 0 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-2 · #53
20
3-2 · #50
13
Spread
UK -12.5
✓ VAN W ATS
Total
43.5 ▼2
▼ Under 33
Projected
18–30
✗ UK lost
Trend: Under ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-0 · #24
28
3-2 · #63
16
Spread
ISU -3
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲2
▼ Under 44
Projected
27–24
✓ ISU won
Trend: ISU ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: WVU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
4-1 · #43
24
3-3 · #67
17
Spread
SYR -1.5
✓ SYR W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼3
▼ Under 41
Projected
29–27
✓ SYR won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: SYR by 2 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-2 · #69
23
3-2 · #90
24
Spread
GASO -1.5
✓ MRSH W ATS
Total
57.5 ▼4
▼ Under 47
Projected
29–30
✓ GASO won
Trend: GASO ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: MRSH by 2 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-3 · #26
21
UCLA
1-4 · #48
17
Spread
MINN -3.5
✓ MINN W ATS
Total
39.5 ▼1
▼ Under 38
Projected
22–18
✓ MINN won
Trend: UCLA ATS ✗ Model: UCLA by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
4-1 · #20
31
4-1 · #25
28
Spread
KSU -3.5
✓ COLO W ATS
Total
54.5 ▲5
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
30–26
✓ KSU won
Trend: COLO ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: KSU by 1 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
4-1 · #29
28
2-3 · #109
7
Spread
BOIS -20.5
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
60.5 ▼1
▼ Under 35
Projected
38–18
✓ BOIS won
Trend: BOIS ATS ✓ Model: HAW by 4.5 ✗ Model: Under 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total