Thu, Oct 10, 2024, 8:00 PM EDTWeek 7 · at Louisiana Tech · Conference game
Weather at kickoff69°F6 mphDryWeather watch ›
1-4 · Power #129
21
final
Final
@
1-3 · Power #112
48
▲ winner
Closing spread
LT -4.5
✓ LT W
Total
47.5
▲ Over · 69 pts
Model before kickoff
MTSU 22–27 LT
✓ LT (64%) won
Closing line · ESPN BET
SourceESPN BET closing line
OpenLT -4
CloseLT -4.5
Total48.5 → 47.5
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.
Loading the recap…

Market

Open → close
Spread
0.5 pts toward Louisiana Tech
Total
Down 1 since the open
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened LT -4 · closed LT -4.5 · moved 0.5 toward LTmodel LT -6.5
Opened 48.5 · closed 47.5 · moved 1 downmodel 49.5
Openline modelKickoff
Line context
Home favorites of 3.5–5.5 since 2023: won 64%, covered 50% (90 games)ⓘ
Closing line · ESPN BET
SourceESPN BET closing line
OpenLT -4
CloseLT -4.5
Total48.5 → 47.5
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.

Similar games

The recent games that looked most like this one before kickoff, and how they turned out

In the 10 games most like LT as a 4.5-point home favorite against MTSU, the favorite won 4, covered 1, and 4 went over the total.

Compare by
Customize filters
Only include
Show up to
games
This game: LT won 48–21; the favorite covered, as in 1 of the 10 similar games. 69 points went over 47.5, as in 4 of 10.
Favorite won
4 of 1040%
Normal range · usually 60%
Favorite covered
1 of 1010%
Below normal · usually 48%
Went over
4 of 1040%
Normal range · usually 48%

Covers below normal. Splits like this often fade, so treat it as context, not a pick. Average result: underdog by 2.5 against an average line of 4.1; 43.5 points a game (usually 53). Of the 3 overs, 1 had cashed by the end of Q3. When games like this go over ›

All 10 games
MatchGameLineFinalCoveredO/U
Very close
NEV vs CSU
2022 · Week 6 · very close · similar situation & spread
-3.514–17 L U45
Very close
BGSU vs WMU
2022 · Week 10 · very close · similar rest & spread
-513–9 L U48
Very close
2023 · Week 10 · very close · similar spread & total
-3.514–27 L U50
Very close
UNM vs UNLV
2021 · Week 10 · very close · similar total & situation
-1.517–31 L O45
Close
M-OH vs WMU
2022 · Week 8 · close · similar situation & total
-710–16 L U44
Close
2023 · Week 10 · close · similar rest & spread
-3.531–27 W O39.75
Close
2024 · Week 4 · close · similar spread & situation
-6.537–34 L O50.5
Close
2023 · Week 13 · close · similar spread & total
-327–29 L O44.25
Close
2024 · Week 5 · close · similar situation & team ratings
-420–21 L U48
Close
2023 · Week 11 · close · similar total & spread
-3.522–19 L U46.5
History, not a prediction. Every FBS game from 2021 on is compared with this one as it looked before kickoff (team strength, the betting line, season form, situation, venue and rest), and only close matches are kept. How matches are found

Signals

The data signal, and 3 trends and market moves behind it
Slight Louisiana Tech ATS trend Hit
Slight-or-stronger ATS leans went 873-886 (50%) in our 2023–26 backtest.
No clear signal on the total

None of these signals has beaten the market in our backtest, so this describes why the matchup is interesting — it isn’t a pick.

Middle Tennessee ATS struggles (1-3)
Middle Tennessee have covered only 25% of their games with a line this season. · Backtest 2023–26: 262-295 (47%)
Middle Tennessee 1-3 ATS as an underdog
Struggling to cover in the role they have in this game. · Backtest 2023–26: 221-216 (51%)
Small sample warning
Louisiana Tech have 3 games with a line this season; trends this early are mostly noise.
Loading play-by-play…

Matchup stats

Season to date before kickoff · ranks among 137 FBS teams
Power rating this season
pts vs an average team · #rank · tap a dot
MTSU−7.5 →−17.1▼ 9.6#126
LT−10.2 →−13.5▼ 3.3#118
Predashed line = average team · hover or tap a dotW6

MTSU
Longer bar = better
LT
#114
Offense
Even
#127
#132
Defense
LT better ▶
#22
−1.4 #130
Turnovers
Even
−2.0 #137
64 plays #96
Pace
LT faster ▶
66 plays #69
Unit by unitEach offense against the other's defense
When MTSU has the ball
Advantage: LT defense
MTSU offLT defEdge
Points / game 16.0 #127 21.8 #52 LT
Yards / play 5.43 #100 4.50 #14 LT
PPA / play +0.02 #111 −0.04 #18 LT
Success rate 37% #117 32% #2 LT
When LT has the ball
Even matchup
LT offMTSU defEdge
Points / game 18.8 #121 39.0 #131 Even
Yards / play 4.87 #121 7.02 #132 Even
PPA / play −0.16 #136 +0.37 #136 Even
Success rate 33% #131 51% #130 Even

Points by quarter and half

Per game this season before kickoff · ranks among 134 FBS teams
MTSU scoring against the LT defense
Q1Q21HQ3Q42H
MTSU scored
3.4
#110
3.4
#130
6.8
#129
5.6
#78
3.6
#128
9.2
#119
LT allowed
6.0
#90
2.3
#8
8.3
#29
7.0
#92
5.8
#62
12.8
#88
LT scoring against the MTSU defense
Q1Q21HQ3Q42H
LT scored
2.3
#130
7.5
#85
9.8
#113
3.3
#121
5.8
#95
9.0
#121
MTSU allowed
11.8
#131
9.4
#99
21.2
#129
10.8
#132
7.0
#88
17.8
#125

Game conditions

At kickoff
Home field
LT +2.5
home-field points in the model
Weather
69° · 6 mph
gusts 7 mph · at kickoff
Rest
MTSU12d
LT12d
Even
Tempo
Average 130 plays
slowavg 133fast
Quarterback
LT backup QB started
Not the usual starter