FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 14: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games6767 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS31-3051% covered
Upsets17outright
Over / Under31-3547% over
Model Favorite49-1873% won
Did the team the spread moved toward cover? ATS vs the closing line, by how far it moved
Moved towardThis week20252024–2026
Any move
17–21–245%
287–313–248%
789–801–850%
1.5+ pts
8–11–142%
143–153–148%
446–443–450%
3+ pts
2–5–129%
78–74–151%
215–206–251%
5+ pts
0–10%
14–1352%
47–4551%
7+ pts
—
6–186%
13–765%
Covered–didn’t–push; % leaves out pushes and is grey under 10 games; green or red from 10 games. ClickTap a row or count to filter.
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Tuesday, Nov 25

2
Final · Conf
3-8 · #120
45
0-11 · #136
14
Spread
BGSU -14
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
44.5
▲ Over 59 · Q3
Projected
30–16
✓ BGSU won
Trend: BGSU ATS ✓ Model: MASS by 1 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
7-4 · #80
31
4-7 · #123
21
Spread
WMU -7
✓ WMU W ATS
Total
49.5 ▲1
▲ Over 52 · Q4
Projected
28–21
✓ WMU won
Trend: WMU ATS ✓ Model: WMU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q2

Thursday, Nov 27

1
Final · Conf
Navy
8-2 · #64
28
8-3 · #61
17
Spread
MEM -4
✓ NAVY W ATS
Total
57.5 ▼1
▼ Under 45
Projected
27–31
✗ MEM lost
Trend: MEM ATS ✗ Model: MEM by 4.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1

Friday, Nov 28

13
Final · Conf
10-1 · #9
38
5-6 · #56
19
Spread
MISS -7.5
✓ MISS W ATS
Total
62.5
▼ Under 57
Projected
36–27
✓ MISS won
Trend: MSST ATS ✗ Model: MISS by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Utah
9-2 · #8
31
5-6 · #54
21
Spread
UTAH -10
Push
Total
60.5 ▲1
▼ Under 52
Projected
34–23
✓ UTAH won
Trend: UTAH ATS Model: UTAH by 4 Model: Under 3.5 ✓
Final · Conf
Iowa
7-4 · #20
40
7-4 · #45
16
Spread
IOWA -5.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
38.5
▲ Over 56 · Q2
Projected
23–18
✓ IOWA won
Trend: IOWA ATS ✓ Model: NEB by 3 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Ohio
7-4 · #78
31
5-6 · #118
26
Spread
OHIO -7
✓ BUFF W ATS
Total
44.5
▲ Over 57 · Q4
Projected
25–18
✓ OHIO won
Trend: OHIO ATS ✗ Model: OHIO by 2 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
4-7 · #132
35
3-8 · #124
31
Spread
NIU -4.5
✓ KENT W ATS
Total
44.5 ▼1
▲ Over 66 · Q4
Projected
20–25
✗ NIU lost
Trend: KENT ATS ✓ Model: NIU by 5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-8 · #95
42
2-9 · #116
21
Spread
—
 
Total
47.5 ▲1
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
28–28
✓ AFA won
Model: Over 9 ✓
Final · Neutral
10-1 · #7
16
9-2 · #39
9
Spread
UGA -16.5
✓ GT W ATS
Total
60.5
▼ Under 25
Projected
37–21
✓ UGA won
Trend: UGA ATS ✗ Model: GT by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
9-2 · #68
17
8-3 · #81
23
Spread
SDSU -1.5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
41.5
▼ Under 40
Projected
23–23
✗ SDSU lost
Model: UNM by 4 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
5-6 · #96
25
10-1 · #38
52
Spread
UNT -20.5
✓ UNT W ATS
Total
65.5 ▲1
▲ Over 77 · Q4
Projected
21–42
✓ UNT won
Trend: UNT ATS ✓ Model: UNT by 1 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
7-4 · #55
25
6-5 · #86
24
Spread
BOIS -1.5
✓ USU W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼1
▼ Under 49
Projected
30–28
✓ BOIS won
Trend: USU ATS ✓ Model: BOIS by 4.5 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
11-0 · #1
56
2-9 · #79
3
Spread
IU -28.5
✓ IU W ATS
Total
54.5 ▲1
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
41–13
✓ IU won
Model: PUR by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
11-0 · #10
17
8-3 · #14
27
Spread
TA&M -2.5
✓ TEX W ATS
Total
54.5 ▲2
▼ Under 44
Projected
26–24
✗ TA&M lost
Trend: TA&M ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: TA&M by 1 ✗ Model: Under 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
8-3 · #26
23
8-3 · #41
7
Spread
ARIZ -2.5
✓ ARIZ W ATS
Total
48.5 ▲1
▼ Under 30
Projected
25–24
✓ ARIZ won
Trend: ASU ATS ✗ Model: ASU by 4.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3

Saturday, Nov 29

51
Final · Conf
11-0 · #2
27
9-2 · #21
9
Spread
OSU -10
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
42.5 ▼1
▼ Under 36
Projected
28–18
✓ OSU won
Trend: OSU ATS ✓ Model: OSU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
10-1 · #5
49
4-7 · #77
0
Spread
TTU -24.5
✓ TTU W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲1
▼ Under 49
Projected
39–15
✓ TTU won
Trend: TTU ATS ✓ Model: WVU by 2 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
9-2 · #6
38
8-3 · #35
7
Spread
MIA -6.5
✓ MIA W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼1
▼ Under 45
Projected
29–22
✓ MIA won
Trend: PITT ATS ✗ Model: MIA by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
5-6 · #52
0
7-4 · #25
41
Spread
UK -1.5
✓ LOU W ATS
Total
45.5
▼ Under 41
Projected
25–25
✗ UK lost
Trend: UK ATS ✗ Model: LOU by 7 ✓ Model: Over 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
6-5 · #34
28
4-7 · #43
14
Spread
SC -2.5
✓ CLEM W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼1
▼ Under 42
Projected
23–25
✗ SC lost
Trend: CLEM ATS ✓ Model: SC by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-3 · #49
31
5-6 · #50
24
Spread
BAY -2.5
✓ HOU W ATS
Total
57.5 ▼2
▼ Under 55
Projected
27–30
✗ BAY lost
Trend: HOU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: BAY by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-8 · #75
14
5-6 · #42
24
Spread
KSU -16.5
✓ COLO W ATS
Total
49.5 ▼1
▼ Under 38
Projected
15–31
✓ KSU won
Model: COLO by 3 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-4 · #36
20
1-10 · #111
13
Spread
ISU -14
✓ OKST W ATS
Total
47.5 ▲2
▼ Under 33
Projected
30–15
✓ ISU won
Trend: OKST ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: ISU by 7 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-4 · #51
42
4-7 · #108
3
Spread
ECU -6.5
✓ ECU W ATS
Total
66.5
▼ Under 45
Projected
33–26
✓ ECU won
Trend: FAU ATS ✗ Model: ECU by 4 ✓ Model: Under 7 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-4 · #48
21
7-4 · #103
3
Spread
TOL -10.5
✓ TOL W ATS
Total
46.5 ▲3
▼ Under 24
Projected
28–17
✓ TOL won
Trend: Over ✗ Model: TOL by 2 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
4-7 · #133
24
6-5 · #91
45
Spread
M-OH -16.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
40.5 ▼1
▲ Over 69 · Q2
Projected
12–29
✓ M-OH won
Trend: M-OH ATS ✓ Model: M-OH by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
UCF
5-6 · #66
21
BYU
10-1 · #19
41
Spread
—
 
Total
46.5 ▼1
▲ Over 62 · Q3
Projected
14–33
✓ BYU won
Final · Conf
UTEP
2-9 · #131
31
5-6 · #117
61
Spread
DEL -4.5
✓ DEL W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲1
▲ Over 92 · Q3
Projected
24–29
✓ DEL won
Trend: UTEP ATS ✗ Model: DEL by 1 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
6-5 · #109
56
2-9 · #135
16
Spread
FIU -10.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼1
▲ Over 72 · Q3
Projected
29–19
✓ FIU won
Trend: FIU ATS ✓ Model: SHSU by 2 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-6 · #105
24
5-6 · #88
19
Spread
MRSH -10.5
✓ GASO W ATS
Total
62.5
▼ Under 43
Projected
26–36
✗ MRSH lost
Trend: MRSH ATS ✗ Model: MRSH by 1 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-3 · #94
34
7-4 · #101
37
Spread
WKU -1.5
✓ JXST W ATS
Total
56.5 ▲1
▲ Over 71 · Q3
Projected
29–27
✗ WKU lost
Trend: WKU ATS ✗ Model: JXST by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
6-5 · #93
42
7-4 · #112
30
Spread
MOST -2.5
✓ LT W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼6
▲ Over 72 · Q4
Projected
22–24
✗ MOST lost
Trend: MOST ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: LT by 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-10 · #125
10
8-3 · #46
27
Spread
ODU -28.5
✓ GAST W ATS
Total
58.5
▼ Under 37
Projected
14–42
✓ ODU won
Trend: ODU ATS ✗ Model: GAST by 2.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-6 · #110
30
5-6 · #115
29
Spread
ARST -1.5
✓ APP W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼2
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
27–27
✓ ARST won
Trend: ARST ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: APP by 6 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-10 · #84
34
3-8 · #92
12
Spread
BC -2.5
✓ BC W ATS
Total
54.5 ▲1
▼ Under 46
Projected
28–26
✓ BC won
Trend: BC ATS ✓ Model: SYR by 5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
2-9 · #128
31
4-7 · #129
24
Spread
—
 
Total
—
 
Projected
23–28
✗ NMSU lost
Final · Conf
3-8 · #130
27
5-6 · #114
30
Spread
UL -10.5
✓ ULM W ATS
Total
47.5 ▼1
▲ Over 57 · Q4
Projected
18–29
✓ UL won
Trend: UL ATS ✗ Model: UL by 1 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-7 · #102
26
5-6 · #71
49
Spread
TXST -9.5
✓ TXST W ATS
Total
62.5 ▼1
▲ Over 75 · Q4
Projected
25–35
✓ TXST won
Trend: USA ATS ✗ Model: TXST by 1 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
UAB
3-8 · #119
31
4-7 · #113
24
Spread
TLSA -9.5
✓ UAB W ATS
Total
56.5
▼ Under 55
Projected
22–31
✗ TLSA lost
Trend: TLSA ATS ✗ Model: UAB by 4.5 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
10-1 · #4
26
8-3 · #15
14
Spread
ORE -6.5
✓ ORE W ATS
Total
51.5
▼ Under 40
Projected
31–25
✓ ORE won
Model: ORE by 2 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
LSU
7-4 · #31
13
9-2 · #16
17
Spread
OU -12.5
✓ LSU W ATS
Total
36.5 ▼1
▼ Under 30
Projected
12–24
✓ OU won
Trend: OU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: LSU by 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
9-2 · #13
45
8-3 · #22
24
Spread
TENN -2.5
✓ VAN W ATS
Total
66.5 ▲1
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
32–34
✗ TENN lost
Trend: VAN ATS ✓ Model: TENN by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-4 · #18
31
2-9 · #40
17
Spread
MIZ -4.5
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼4
▼ Under 48
Projected
30–26
✓ MIZ won
Trend: MIZ ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: ARK by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
4-7 · #63
7
6-5 · #69
17
Spread
WIS -2.5
✓ MINN W ATS
Total
38.5
▼ Under 24
Projected
20–18
✗ WIS lost
Trend: WIS ATS ✗ Model: MINN by 2.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-6 · #17
40
5-6 · #62
36
Spread
PSU -14
✓ RUTG W ATS
Total
55.5
▲ Over 76 · Q3
Projected
36–23
✓ PSU won
Trend: RUTG ATS ✓ Model: RUTG by 3 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-3 · #53
32
Duke
6-5 · #47
49
Spread
DUKE -2.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼1
▲ Over 81 · Q3
Projected
25–27
✓ DUKE won
Trend: WAKE ATS ✗ Model: DUKE by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-4 · #58
23
TCU
7-4 · #33
45
Spread
TCU -3
✓ TCU W ATS
Total
58.5 ▲2
▲ Over 68 · Q4
Projected
28–32
✓ TCU won
Trend: Over ✓ Model: TCU by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-3 · #97
48
4-7 · #104
42
Spread
KENN -2.5
✓ KENN W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲1
▲ Over 90 · Q4
Projected
28–26
✓ KENN won
Trend: KENN ATS ✓ Model: LIB by 3 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: OT
Final · Conf
Troy
7-4 · #99
28
7-4 · #98
18
Spread
USM -6.5
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
50.5
▼ Under 46
Projected
21–28
✗ USM lost
Trend: TROY ATS ✓ Model: TROY by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Army
5-5 · #83
27
UTSA
6-5 · #65
24
Spread
UTSA -8.5
✓ ARMY W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼1
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
21–30
✗ UTSA lost
Trend: UTSA ATS ✗ Model: UTSA by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
10-1 · #28
59
6-5 · #122
10
Spread
JMU -23.5
✓ JMU W ATS
Total
53.5
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
36–13
✓ JMU won
Trend: JMU ATS ✓ Model: CCU by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
5-6 · #23
21
3-8 · #37
40
Spread
FSU -1.5
✓ FLA W ATS
Total
49.5
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
25–24
✗ FSU lost
Model: FSU by 1 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-9 · #100
8
5-6 · #60
32
Spread
WSU -14.5
✓ WSU W ATS
Total
42.5 ▼1
▼ Under 40
Projected
16–31
✓ WSU won
Trend: WSU ATS ✓ Model: WSU by 0 ✓ Model: Over 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
3-8 · #73
7
9-2 · #32
27
Spread
UVA -8.5
✓ UVA W ATS
Total
52.5
▼ Under 34
Projected
23–32
✓ UVA won
Trend: UVA ATS ✓ Model: UVA by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Neutral
4-7 · #72
28
3-8 · #67
38
Spread
MSU -4
✓ MSU W ATS
Total
49.5
▲ Over 66 · Q3
Projected
23–26
✓ MSU won
Trend: MD ATS ✗ Model: MD by 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Rice
5-6 · #126
3
8-3 · #29
52
Spread
USF -28.5
✓ USF W ATS
Total
57.5 ▼2
▼ Under 55
Projected
11–40
✓ USF won
Trend: USF ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: USF by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 6 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
9-2 · #11
27
5-6 · #24
20
Spread
ALA -7
Push
Total
48.5 ▲2
▼ Under 47
Projected
27–20
✓ ALA won
Trend: Over ✗ Model: ALA by 1 Model: Under 1.5 ✓
Final · Conf
UCLA
3-8 · #70
10
USC
8-3 · #12
29
Spread
USC -21.5
✓ UCLA W ATS
Total
59.5
▼ Under 39
Projected
18–40
✓ USC won
Trend: USC ATS ✗ Model: USC by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-10 · #134
0
9-2 · #57
27
Spread
TULN -29.5
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
51.5 ▲1
▼ Under 27
Projected
10–40
✓ TULN won
Trend: CLT ATS ✓ Model: TULN by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-5 · #59
13
7-4 · #30
20
Spread
ILL -7
Push
Total
43.5 ▼4
▼ Under 33
Projected
19–26
✓ ILL won
Trend: ILL ATSTrend: Under ✓ Model: ILL by 2 Model: Over 1 ✗
Final · Conf
4-7 · #89
19
6-5 · #44
42
Spread
NCSU -7
✓ NCSU W ATS
Total
48.5
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
22–30
✓ NCSU won
Model: NCSU by 5 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
SMU
8-3 · #27
35
6-5 · #76
38
Spread
SMU -13.5
✓ CAL W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼3
▲ Over 73 · Q4
Projected
32–19
✗ SMU lost
Trend: SMU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: CAL by 1 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UNLV
9-2 · #74
42
3-8 · #121
17
Spread
UNLV -7.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
52.5
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
32–25
✓ UNLV won
Trend: UNLV ATS ✓ Model: UNLV by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
9-2 · #3
49
4-7 · #85
20
Spread
ND -32.5
✓ STAN W ATS
Total
49.5
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
41–9
✓ ND won
Model: STAN by 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
7-4 · #82
41
3-8 · #106
14
Spread
FRES -3
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
44.5 ▼2
▲ Over 55 · Q4
Projected
27–25
✓ FRES won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: SJSU by 2 ✗ Model: Over 7.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
4-7 · #107
7
7-4 · #90
27
Spread
HAW -8.5
✓ HAW W ATS
Total
44.5
▼ Under 34
Projected
18–27
✓ HAW won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: WYO by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total