FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 13: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games6060 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS35-2558% covered
Upsets14outright
Over / Under29-3148% over
Model Favorite46-1477% won
Did the team the spread moved toward cover? ATS vs the closing line, by how far it moved
Moved towardThis week20252024–2026
Any move
23–2350%
287–313–248%
789–801–850%
1.5+ pts
7–1237%
143–153–148%
446–443–450%
3+ pts
4–736%
78–74–151%
215–206–251%
5+ pts
1–233%
14–1352%
47–4551%
7+ pts
—
6–186%
13–765%
Covered–didn’t–push; % leaves out pushes and is grey under 10 games; green or red from 10 games. ClickTap a row or count to filter.
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Tuesday, Nov 18

3
Final · Conf
4-7 · #127
19
3-7 · #120
16
Spread
BGSU -2.5
✓ AKR W ATS
Total
47.5
▼ Under 35
Projected
21–24
✗ BGSU lost
Trend: AKR ATS ✓ Model: BGSU by 4 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-4 · #80
35
3-7 · #124
19
Spread
WMU -6.5
✓ WMU W ATS
Total
38.5
▲ Over 54 · Q4
Projected
21–15
✓ WMU won
Trend: WMU ATS ✓ Model: NIU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
0-10 · #136
14
Ohio
6-4 · #78
42
Spread
OHIO -34.5
✓ MASS W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲2
▲ Over 56 · Q4
Projected
10–44
✓ OHIO won
Trend: OHIO ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: MASS by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1

Wednesday, Nov 19

2
Final · Conf
5-5 · #91
37
5-5 · #118
20
Spread
M-OH -2.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
38.5 ▼1
▲ Over 57 · Q3
Projected
23–20
✓ M-OH won
Trend: M-OH ATS ✓ Model: M-OH by 2 ✓ Model: Over 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
6-4 · #103
28
4-6 · #132
16
Spread
CMU -7.5
✓ CMU W ATS
Total
50.5 ▲3
▼ Under 44
Projected
30–22
✓ CMU won
Trend: CMU ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: CMU by 2 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q2

Thursday, Nov 20

1
Final · Conf
4-6 · #114
34
5-5 · #110
30
Spread
ARST -2.5
✓ UL W ATS
Total
54.5
▲ Over 64 · Q3
Projected
26–28
✗ ARST lost
Trend: ARST ATS ✗ Model: UL by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3

Friday, Nov 21

2
Final · Conf
5-5 · #23
11
5-5 · #44
21
Spread
FSU -6.5
✓ NCSU W ATS
Total
59.5 ▼2
▼ Under 32
Projected
34–27
✗ FSU lost
Trend: FSU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: FSU by 2 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-3 · #90
10
UNLV
8-2 · #74
38
Spread
UNLV -2.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
64.5
▼ Under 48
Projected
29–32
✓ UNLV won
Trend: HAW ATS ✗ Model: UNLV by 5.5 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1

Saturday, Nov 22

52
Final · Conf
5-5 · #62
9
10-0 · #2
42
Spread
OSU -28.5
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼1
▼ Under 51
Projected
13–43
✓ OSU won
Trend: OSU ATS ✓ Model: OSU by 3 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
7-3 · #18
6
8-2 · #16
17
Spread
OU -4.5
✓ OU W ATS
Total
42.5
▼ Under 23
Projected
20–25
✓ OU won
Trend: MIZ ATS ✗ Model: MIZ by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
8-2 · #6
34
3-7 · #73
17
Spread
MIA -17.5
✓ VT W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼1
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
32–14
✓ MIA won
Trend: MIA ATS ✗ Model: MIA by 2 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-4 · #69
35
5-5 · #59
38
Spread
NU -4.5
✓ MINN W ATS
Total
41.5
▲ Over 73 · Q3
Projected
18–23
✓ NU won
Trend: NU ATS ✗ Model: NU by 0 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
7-3 · #25
6
SMU
7-3 · #27
38
Spread
SMU -3.5
✓ SMU W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼3
▼ Under 44
Projected
25–29
✓ SMU won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: LOU by 2 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
5-5 · #117
14
7-3 · #53
52
Spread
WAKE -17.5
✓ WAKE W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼5
▲ Over 66 · Q3
Projected
15–33
✓ WAKE won
Trend: WAKE ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: WAKE by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
5-5 · #54
14
6-4 · #36
38
Spread
ISU -3.5
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲1
▼ Under 52
Projected
25–29
✓ ISU won
Model: ISU by 3 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-7 · #113
26
Army
5-4 · #83
25
Spread
ARMY -9.5
✓ TLSA W ATS
Total
43.5 ▼3
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
17–27
✗ ARMY lost
Trend: TLSA ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: ARMY by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-9 · #134
3
9-1 · #7
35
Spread
UGA -42.5
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼2
▼ Under 38
Projected
2–47
✓ UGA won
Trend: CLT ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: UGA by 8.5 ✗ Model: Under 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
5-5 · #60
20
9-1 · #28
24
Spread
JMU -15.5
✓ WSU W ATS
Total
45.5 ▲1
▼ Under 44
Projected
14–29
✓ JMU won
Trend: JMU ATS ✗ Model: WSU by 1 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-5 · #50
17
7-3 · #26
41
Spread
ARIZ -6.5
✓ ARIZ W ATS
Total
60.5 ▼2
▼ Under 58
Projected
27–34
✓ ARIZ won
Trend: ARIZ ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: ARIZ by 1 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
7-3 · #46
45
5-5 · #105
10
Spread
ODU -10.5
✓ ODU W ATS
Total
62.5 ▼1
▼ Under 55
Projected
35–24
✓ ODU won
Model: ODU by 2.5 ✓ Model: Under 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-3 · #112
34
7-3 · #97
41
Spread
KENN -6.5
✓ KENN W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼4
▲ Over 75 · Q4
Projected
22–29
✓ KENN won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: MOST by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
2-8 · #121
13
4-6 · #107
7
Spread
WYO -6.5
✓ NEV W ATS
Total
40.5 ▼1
▼ Under 20
Projected
16–23
✗ WYO lost
Trend: WYO ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: WYO by 4 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-6 · #133
9
6-4 · #48
38
Spread
TOL -28.5
✓ TOL W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼2
▲ Over 47 · Q4
Projected
8–37
✓ TOL won
Trend: TOL ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: TOL by 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
5-5 · #88
24
4-6 · #115
26
Spread
MRSH -3.5
✓ APP W ATS
Total
57.5 ▲3
▼ Under 50
Projected
29–25
✗ MRSH lost
Trend: MRSH ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: MRSH by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
8-3 · #87
48
4-6 · #108
45
Spread
CONN -5.5
✓ FAU W ATS
Total
64.5 ▼3
▲ Over 93 · Q3
Projected
35–29
✓ CONN won
Trend: FAU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: FAU by 1 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
4-6 · #104
28
5-5 · #93
34
Spread
LIB -1.5
✓ LT W ATS
Total
45.5
▲ Over 62 · Q4
Projected
23–23
✗ LIB lost
Trend: LT ATS ✓ Model: LT by 6.5 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
2-8 · #135
17
1-9 · #128
31
Spread
MTSU -6.5
✓ MTSU W ATS
Total
53.5
▼ Under 48
Projected
23–29
✓ MTSU won
Trend: MTSU ATS ✓ Model: SHSU by 1 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
3-7 · #129
34
UTEP
2-8 · #131
31
Spread
UTEP -4.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
45.5
▲ Over 65 · Q3
Projected
20–25
✗ UTEP lost
Trend: NMSU ATS ✓ Model: NMSU by 1 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
7-3 · #29
48
UAB
3-7 · #119
18
Spread
USF -22.5
✓ USF W ATS
Total
68.5 ▼1
▼ Under 66
Projected
43–21
✓ USF won
Trend: USF ATS ✓ Model: UAB by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
USC
8-2 · #12
27
9-1 · #4
42
Spread
ORE -12.5
✓ ORE W ATS
Total
60.5 ▲5
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
25–37
✓ ORE won
Trend: ORE ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: USC by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
3-7 · #92
7
8-2 · #3
70
Spread
ND -36.5
✓ ND W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼1
▲ Over 77 · Q3
Projected
8–44
✓ ND won
Trend: SYR ATS ✗ Model: SYR by 3 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
5-5 · #52
17
8-2 · #13
45
Spread
VAN -6.5
✓ VAN W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲1
▲ Over 62 · Q4
Projected
23–30
✓ VAN won
Trend: VAN ATS ✓ Model: VAN by 4 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
2-8 · #40
37
7-3 · #14
52
Spread
TEX -10.5
✓ TEX W ATS
Total
57.5 ▲1
▲ Over 89 · Q3
Projected
23–33
✓ TEX won
Trend: ARK ATS ✗ Model: ARK by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
3-7 · #67
17
Iowa
6-4 · #20
20
Spread
IOWA -17.5
✓ MSU W ATS
Total
43.5 ▲1
▼ Under 37
Projected
12–30
✓ IOWA won
Trend: MSU ATS ✓ Model: IOWA by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Duke
5-5 · #47
32
4-6 · #89
25
Spread
DUKE -6.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼1
▲ Over 57 · Q4
Projected
30–23
✓ DUKE won
Model: DUKE by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
7-3 · #101
21
5-5 · #109
27
Spread
FIU -2.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
56.5 ▲1
▼ Under 48
Projected
26–28
✓ FIU won
Model: JXST by 2 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
7-3 · #98
35
3-7 · #102
42
Spread
USM -2.5
✓ USA W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼3
▲ Over 77 · Q4
Projected
28–26
✗ USM lost
Trend: USM ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: USA by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-3 · #51
24
UTSA
5-5 · #65
58
Spread
ECU -2.5
✓ UTSA W ATS
Total
61.5
▲ Over 82 · Q4
Projected
31–28
✗ ECU lost
Model: ECU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-2 · #57
37
5-5 · #96
13
Spread
TULN -7.5
✓ TULN W ATS
Total
54.5
▼ Under 50
Projected
31–23
✓ TULN won
Trend: TEM ATS ✗ Model: TULN by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
5-5 · #42
47
Utah
8-2 · #8
51
Spread
UTAH -18.5
✓ KSU W ATS
Total
52.5
▲ Over 98 · Q3
Projected
17–36
✓ UTAH won
Trend: UTAH ATS ✗ Model: UTAH by 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-2 · #21
45
4-6 · #72
20
Spread
MICH -13.5
✓ MICH W ATS
Total
46.5 ▲1
▲ Over 65 · Q3
Projected
30–17
✓ MICH won
Trend: MD ATS ✗ Model: MD by 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
TCU
6-4 · #33
17
8-2 · #49
14
Spread
TCU -1.5
✓ TCU W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲1
▼ Under 31
Projected
28–27
✓ TCU won
Trend: HOU ATS ✗ Model: TCU by 1 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
1-9 · #111
14
UCF
4-6 · #66
17
Spread
UCF -12.5
✓ OKST W ATS
Total
47.5
▼ Under 31
Projected
17–31
✓ UCF won
Trend: UCF ATS ✗ Model: UCF by 7.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-9 · #125
19
Troy
6-4 · #99
31
Spread
TROY -10.5
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
51.5
▼ Under 50
Projected
20–31
✓ TROY won
Trend: TROY ATS ✓ Model: TROY by 1 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
6-4 · #122
7
3-7 · #43
51
Spread
SC -24.5
✓ SC W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼3
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
11–35
✓ SC won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: CCU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
3-7 · #130
14
4-6 · #71
31
Spread
TXST -20.5
✓ ULM W ATS
Total
60.5 ▲5
▼ Under 45
Projected
19–40
✓ TXST won
Trend: TXST ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: TXST by 1 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-3 · #35
42
9-1 · #39
28
Spread
GT -2.5
✓ PITT W ATS
Total
61.5
▲ Over 70 · Q4
Projected
28–30
✗ GT lost
Trend: PITT ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: PITT by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-3 · #45
10
4-6 · #17
37
Spread
PSU -7.5
✓ PSU W ATS
Total
45.5 ▲1
▲ Over 47 · Q4
Projected
21–29
✓ PSU won
Trend: NEB ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: NEB by 0 ✗ Model: Over 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
7-3 · #81
20
3-7 · #95
3
Spread
UNM -3.5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼5
▼ Under 23
Projected
31–28
✓ UNM won
Trend: UNM ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: AFA by 3 ✗ Model: Over 5.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-8 · #116
21
6-4 · #55
49
Spread
BOIS -17.5
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
46.5 ▲1
▲ Over 70 · Q4
Projected
17–34
✓ BOIS won
Trend: BOIS ATS ✓ Model: BOIS by 2 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
7-3 · #22
31
3-7 · #37
11
Spread
TENN -3.5
✓ TENN W ATS
Total
57.5
▼ Under 42
Projected
30–27
✓ TENN won
Model: TENN by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-3 · #30
10
3-7 · #63
27
Spread
ILL -8.5
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
41.5 ▼1
▼ Under 37
Projected
26–18
✗ ILL lost
Trend: ILL ATS ✗ Model: WIS by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-4 · #76
10
3-7 · #85
31
Spread
CAL -4.5
✓ STAN W ATS
Total
47.5 ▼3
▼ Under 41
Projected
26–22
✗ CAL lost
Trend: CAL ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: STAN by 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
9-1 · #38
56
Rice
5-5 · #126
24
Spread
UNT -18.5
✓ UNT W ATS
Total
56.5 ▲1
▲ Over 80 · Q3
Projected
38–19
✓ UNT won
Trend: UNT ATS ✓ Model: UNT by 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
8-2 · #94
10
LSU
6-4 · #31
13
Spread
LSU -25.5
✓ WKU W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲2
▼ Under 23
Projected
14–39
✓ LSU won
Trend: WKU ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
BYU
9-1 · #19
26
7-3 · #58
14
Spread
BYU -2.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
57.5 ▲4
▼ Under 40
Projected
29–26
✓ BYU won
Trend: BYU ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: BYU by 3 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-3 · #41
42
3-7 · #75
17
Spread
ASU -6.5
✓ ASU W ATS
Total
47.5 ▼1
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
27–21
✓ ASU won
Trend: COLO ATS ✗ Model: COLO by 1 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
7-3 · #15
48
UCLA
3-7 · #70
14
Spread
WASH -10.5
✓ WASH W ATS
Total
51.5
▲ Over 62 · Q4
Projected
32–21
✓ WASH won
Trend: WASH ATS ✓ Model: WASH by 1 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
5-5 · #86
28
7-3 · #82
17
Spread
FRES -1.5
✓ USU W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼1
▼ Under 45
Projected
26–28
✗ FRES lost
Trend: USU ATS ✓ Model: FRES by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
3-7 · #106
3
8-2 · #68
25
Spread
SDSU -9.5
✓ SDSU W ATS
Total
51.5 ▲2
▼ Under 28
Projected
21–31
✓ SDSU won
Trend: SDSU ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: SDSU by 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total