FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 2: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games5151 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS22-2943% covered
Upsets12outright
Over / Under29-2257% over
Model Favorite39-1276% won
Did the team the spread moved toward cover? ATS vs the closing line, by how far it moved
Moved towardThis week20252024–2026
Any move
18–1850%
287–313–248%
789–801–850%
1.5+ pts
7–847%
143–153–148%
446–443–450%
3+ pts
2–340%
78–74–151%
215–206–251%
5+ pts
0–10%
14–1352%
47–4551%
7+ pts
—
6–186%
13–765%
Covered–didn’t–push; % leaves out pushes and is grey under 10 games; green or red from 10 games. ClickTap a row or count to filter.
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Friday, Sep 5

2
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #28
14
1-0 · #25
28
Spread
LOU -15.5
✓ JMU W ATS
Total
56.5 ▼1
▼ Under 42
Projected
20–35
✓ LOU won
Model: JMU by 2 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #124
9
1-0 · #72
20
Spread
MD -16.5
✓ NIU W ATS
Total
44.5 ▼4
▼ Under 29
Projected
15–31
✓ MD won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: NIU by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1

Saturday, Sep 6

49
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #109
0
1-0 · #17
34
Spread
PSU -41.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼1
▼ Under 34
Projected
4–46
✓ PSU won
Model: FIU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #106
7
0-1 · #14
38
Spread
TEX -36.5
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
52.5 ▲1
▼ Under 45
Projected
5–42
✓ TEX won
Model: TEX by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #30
45
Duke
1-0 · #47
19
Spread
ILL -2.5
✓ ILL W ATS
Total
49.5 ▼1
▲ Over 64 · Q4
Projected
27–25
✓ ILL won
Model: DUKE by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
Iowa
1-0 · #20
13
2-0 · #36
16
Spread
ISU -3.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
43.5 ▲1
▼ Under 29
Projected
21–25
✓ ISU won
Model: IOWA by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #50
48
SMU
1-0 · #27
45
Spread
SMU -2.5
✓ BAY W ATS
Total
65.5
▲ Over 93 · Q4
Projected
28–32
✗ SMU lost
Model: SMU by 5 ✗ Model: Under 5.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #97
9
1-0 · #1
56
Spread
IU -35.5
✓ IU W ATS
Total
51.5 ▲1
▲ Over 65 · Q4
Projected
5–41
✓ IU won
Model: IU by 4 ✓ Model: Under 5.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #132
14
1-0 · #5
62
Spread
TTU -47.5
✓ TTU W ATS
Total
59.5 ▼1
▲ Over 76 · Q4
Projected
6–53
✓ TTU won
Model: KENT by 7 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #32
31
1-0 · #44
35
Spread
NCSU -2.5
✓ NCSU W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼2
▲ Over 66 · Q3
Projected
26–28
✓ NCSU won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: UVA by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #103
17
1-0 · #35
45
Spread
PITT -21.5
✓ PITT W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼5
▲ Over 62 · Q4
Projected
15–36
✓ PITT won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: CMU by 2 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #87
20
0-1 · #92
27
Spread
SYR -7.5
✓ CONN W ATS
Total
57.5 ▼2
▼ Under 47
Projected
25–34
✓ SYR won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: SYR by 5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-0 · #104
24
0-1 · #101
34
Spread
LIB -6.5
✓ JXST W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼2
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
28–24
✗ LIB lost
Trend: Under ✗ Model: JXST by 10 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #86
22
1-0 · #10
44
Spread
TA&M -34.5
✓ USU W ATS
Total
57.5 ▲2
▲ Over 66 · Q4
Projected
13–47
✓ TA&M won
Trend: TA&M ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: USU by 4 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #111
3
1-0 · #4
69
Spread
ORE -28.5
✓ ORE W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼3
▲ Over 72 · Q3
Projected
16–45
✓ ORE won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: ORE by 1 ✓ Model: Over 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
Troy
1-0 · #99
16
0-1 · #34
27
Spread
CLEM -29.5
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
51.5
▼ Under 43
Projected
11–40
✓ CLEM won
Trend: TROY ATS ✓ Model: TROY by 4 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-0 · #9
30
1-0 · #52
23
Spread
MISS -7.5
✓ UK W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼1
▲ Over 53 · Q4
Projected
30–21
✓ MISS won
Trend: UK ATS ✓ Model: MISS by 9 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #54
31
1-0 · #18
42
Spread
MIZ -6.5
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
49.5 ▼1
▲ Over 73 · Q3
Projected
22–29
✓ MIZ won
Model: MIZ by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #82
36
0-1 · #100
27
Spread
ORST -1.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
44.5 ▼4
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
24–25
✗ ORST lost
Trend: Under ✗ Model: FRES by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #120
20
0-1 · #58
34
Spread
CIN -21.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
46.5
▲ Over 54 · Q4
Projected
14–33
✓ CIN won
Model: BGSU by 9.5 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #117
7
0-1 · #75
31
Spread
COLO -23.5
✓ COLO W ATS
Total
49.5 ▼1
▼ Under 38
Projected
15–41
✓ COLO won
Trend: COLO ATS ✓ Model: COLO by 12 ✓ Model: Over 5.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #71
43
UTSA
0-1 · #65
36
Spread
UTSA -4.5
✓ TXST W ATS
Total
64.5 ▼2
▲ Over 79 · Q4
Projected
31–34
✗ UTSA lost
Trend: Under ✗ Model: TXST by 7 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UAB
1-0 · #119
24
Navy
1-0 · #64
38
Spread
NAVY -22.5
✓ UAB W ATS
Total
58.5 ▼1
▲ Over 62 · Q4
Projected
17–39
✓ NAVY won
Model: UAB by 4 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #38
33
0-1 · #80
30
Spread
UNT -12.5
✓ WMU W ATS
Total
56.5 ▼4
▲ Over 63 · OT
Projected
35–23
✓ UNT won
Trend: UNT ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: WMU by 5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #128
10
1-0 · #63
42
Spread
WIS -28.5
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
44.5 ▼2
▲ Over 52 · Q4
Projected
8–37
✓ WIS won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: WIS by 5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #77
10
Ohio
0-1 · #78
17
Spread
WVU -3.5
✓ OHIO W ATS
Total
58.5 ▼2
▼ Under 27
Projected
29–26
✗ WVU lost
Trend: Under ✓ Model: WVU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #29
18
1-0 · #37
16
Spread
FLA -18.5
✓ USF W ATS
Total
58.5 ▲4
▼ Under 34
Projected
17–36
✗ FLA lost
Trend: FLA ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: USF by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #91
17
1-0 · #62
45
Spread
RUTG -15.5
✓ RUTG W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼3
▲ Over 62 · Q3
Projected
17–32
✓ RUTG won
Trend: RUTG ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: M-OH by 3 ✗ Model: Over 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #110
14
1-0 · #40
56
Spread
ARK -24.5
✓ ARK W ATS
Total
61.5 ▼2
▲ Over 70 · Q3
Projected
18–42
✓ ARK won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: ARST by 2 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
17
0-1 · #121
20
Spread
NEV -9.5
✓ SAC W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲1
▼ Under 37
Projected
25–35
✓ NEV won
Trend: NEV ATS ✗ Model: NEV by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #112
21
0-1 · #88
20
Spread
MRSH -7.5
✓ MOST W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼3
▼ Under 41
Projected
23–34
✗ MRSH lost
Trend: MOST ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: MRSH by 15 ✗ Model: Over 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #89
20
0-1 · #134
3
Spread
UNC -16.5
✓ UNC W ATS
Total
49.5 ▲2
▼ Under 23
Projected
36–20
✓ UNC won
Trend: UNC ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: CLT by 4 ✗ Model: Over 6.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
Army
0-1 · #83
24
1-1 · #42
21
Spread
KSU -16.5
✓ ARMY W ATS
Total
48.5 ▲2
▼ Under 45
Projected
16–35
✗ KSU lost
Trend: Over ✗ Model: KSU by 8.5 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #49
35
Rice
1-0 · #126
9
Spread
HOU -13.5
✓ HOU W ATS
Total
38.5 ▼2
▲ Over 44 · Q4
Projected
25–14
✓ HOU won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: RICE by 9.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #94
21
0-1 · #48
45
Spread
TOL -7.5
✓ TOL W ATS
Total
56.5 ▼2
▲ Over 66 · Q4
Projected
24–31
✓ TOL won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: WKU by 4.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #61
38
0-1 · #125
16
Spread
MEM -15.5
✓ MEM W ATS
Total
57.5 ▲3
▼ Under 54
Projected
37–22
✓ MEM won
Trend: MEM ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: GAST by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #57
33
1-0 · #102
31
Spread
TULN -13.5
✓ USA W ATS
Total
51.5
▲ Over 64 · Q4
Projected
33–21
✓ TULN won
Trend: TULN ATS ✗ Model: USA by 7.5 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #93
7
LSU
1-0 · #31
23
Spread
LSU -36.5
✓ LT W ATS
Total
49.5 ▼3
▼ Under 30
Projected
5–41
✓ LSU won
Trend: LSU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: LT by 2 ✓ Model: Under 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #41
20
1-0 · #56
24
Spread
ASU -5.5
✓ MSST W ATS
Total
58.5 ▼1
▼ Under 44
Projected
32–26
✗ ASU lost
Model: ASU by 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #21
13
1-0 · #16
24
Spread
OU -3.5
✓ OU W ATS
Total
44.5 ▼1
▼ Under 37
Projected
18–22
✓ OU won
Trend: MICH ATS ✗ Model: MICH by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #133
3
1-0 · #24
42
Spread
AUB -42.5
✓ BALL W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼2
▼ Under 45
Projected
6–47
✓ AUB won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: BALL by 6 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #13
44
0-1 · #73
20
Spread
VT -2.5
✓ VAN W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼1
▲ Over 64 · Q4
Projected
23–26
✗ VT lost
Model: VT by 4 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #127
0
1-0 · #45
68
Spread
NEB -33.5
✓ NEB W ATS
Total
47.5
▲ Over 68 · Q3
Projected
6–39
✓ NEB won
Model: AKR by 3 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #105
20
USC
1-0 · #12
59
Spread
USC -28.5
✓ USC W ATS
Total
62.5 ▼2
▲ Over 79 · Q3
Projected
17–46
✓ USC won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: USC by 2 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #84
40
1-0 · #67
42
Spread
MSU -3.5
✓ BC W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼1
▲ Over 82 · Q3
Projected
20–22
✓ MSU won
Model: BC by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #130
0
0-1 · #11
73
Spread
ALA -34.5
✓ ALA W ATS
Total
50.5
▲ Over 73 · Q3
Projected
8–42
✓ ALA won
Trend: ULM ATS ✗ Model: ULM by 3 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
UCLA
0-1 · #70
23
UNLV
2-0 · #74
30
Spread
UCLA -2.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼1
▼ Under 53
Projected
29–28
✗ UCLA lost
Model: UNLV by 10 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #113
14
1-0 · #129
21
Spread
TLSA -3.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲1
▼ Under 35
Projected
28–25
✗ TLSA lost
Model: NMSU by 4 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #68
13
1-0 · #60
36
Spread
WSU -2.5
✓ WSU W ATS
Total
46.5 ▲1
▲ Over 49 · Q4
Projected
25–29
✓ WSU won
Model: WSU by 10 ✓ Model: Over 7.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #85
3
BYU
1-0 · #19
27
Spread
BYU -20.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
43.5 ▼4
▼ Under 30
Projected
14–36
✓ BYU won
Trend: BYU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: BYU by 4.5 ✓ Model: Over 6.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
0-2 · #135
20
1-1 · #90
37
Spread
HAW -7.5
✓ HAW W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼1
▲ Over 57 · Q4
Projected
21–28
✓ HAW won
Model: SHSU by 3 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total