FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 7: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games5656 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS28-2850% covered
Upsets16outright
Over / Under26-3046% over
Model Favorite40-1671% won
Did the team the spread moved toward cover? ATS vs the closing line, by how far it moved
Moved towardThis week20252024–2026
Any move
20–2149%
287–313–248%
789–801–850%
1.5+ pts
12–667%
143–153–148%
446–443–450%
3+ pts
4–267%
78–74–151%
215–206–251%
5+ pts
—
14–1352%
47–4551%
7+ pts
—
6–186%
13–765%
Covered–didn’t–push; % leaves out pushes and is grey under 10 games; green or red from 10 games. ClickTap a row or count to filter.
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Wednesday, Oct 8

2
Final · Conf
2-3 · #112
22
1-4 · #128
20
Spread
MOST -2.5
✓ MTSU W ATS
Total
52.5 ▲2
▼ Under 42
Projected
27–25
✓ MOST won
Trend: MOST ATS ✗ Model: MTSU by 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
1-4 · #104
19
UTEP
1-4 · #131
8
Spread
LIB -1.5
✓ LIB W ATS
Total
47.5 ▲1
▼ Under 27
Projected
23–22
✓ LIB won
Trend: UTEP ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: UTEP by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1

Thursday, Oct 9

4
Final · Conf
4-1 · #93
7
3-2 · #97
35
Spread
LT -5.5
✓ KENN W ATS
Total
45.5
▼ Under 42
Projected
25–19
✗ LT lost
Trend: LT ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: LT by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
3-2 · #51
19
4-1 · #57
26
Spread
TULN -6.5
✓ TULN W ATS
Total
53.5
▼ Under 45
Projected
22–29
✓ TULN won
Trend: ECU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: ECU by 0 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
2-3 · #101
29
0-5 · #135
27
Spread
JXST -7.5
✓ SHSU W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼3
▲ Over 56 · Q4
Projected
32–24
✓ JXST won
Trend: JXST ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: SHSU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-2 · #98
38
2-3 · #105
35
Spread
USM -2.5
✓ USM W ATS
Total
60.5 ▲1
▲ Over 73 · Q4
Projected
30–28
✓ USM won
Trend: USM ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: GASO by 4 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2

Friday, Oct 10

3
Final · Conf
4-1 · #29
63
5-0 · #38
36
Spread
UNT -2.5
✓ USF W ATS
Total
68.5 ▲2
▲ Over 99 · Q3
Projected
31–34
✗ UNT lost
Trend: UNT ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: USF by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
3-2 · #62
19
4-1 · #15
38
Spread
WASH -9.5
✓ WASH W ATS
Total
62.5 ▲3
▼ Under 57
Projected
25–36
✓ WASH won
Trend: Over ✗ Model: WASH by 4 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
5-1 · #82
21
1-4 · #116
49
Spread
FRES -5.5
✓ CSU W ATS
Total
48.5 ▲3
▲ Over 70 · Q2
Projected
26–21
✗ FRES lost
Trend: CSU ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: CSU by 5 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1

Saturday, Oct 11

47
Final · Conf
5-0 · #2
34
5-1 · #30
16
Spread
OSU -15.5
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
51.5 ▲3
▼ Under 50
Projected
33–17
✓ OSU won
Trend: Over ✗ Model: OSU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
4-1 · #11
27
5-0 · #18
24
Spread
ALA -3.5
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼4
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
28–25
✓ ALA won
Trend: ALA ATS ✗ Model: ALA by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
3-2 · #35
34
3-2 · #23
31
Spread
FSU -11.5
✓ PITT W ATS
Total
57.5 ▼1
▲ Over 65 · Q4
Projected
21–33
✗ FSU lost
Trend: FSU ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: FSU by 1 ✗ Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UCLA
1-4 · #70
38
3-2 · #67
13
Spread
MSU -6.5
✓ UCLA W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼4
▼ Under 51
Projected
21–28
✗ MSU lost
Trend: UCLA ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: MSU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-3 · #85
10
SMU
3-2 · #27
34
Spread
SMU -19.5
✓ SMU W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼1
▼ Under 44
Projected
17–36
✓ SMU won
Trend: SMU ATS ✓ Model: STAN by 0 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
UCF
3-2 · #66
11
4-1 · #58
20
Spread
CIN -10.5
✓ UCF W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼1
▼ Under 31
Projected
22–32
✓ CIN won
Trend: CIN ATS ✗ Model: UCF by 4.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
4-1 · #49
39
1-4 · #111
17
Spread
HOU -14.5
✓ HOU W ATS
Total
47.5 ▲1
▲ Over 56 · Q4
Projected
31–17
✓ HOU won
Trend: HOU ATS ✓ Model: OKST by 1 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
2-3 · #114
14
4-1 · #28
24
Spread
JMU -18.5
✓ UL W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼1
▼ Under 38
Projected
15–33
✓ JMU won
Trend: JMU ATS ✗ Model: JMU by 2 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-4 · #134
7
Army
2-3 · #83
24
Spread
ARMY -17.5
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
44.5 ▼3
▼ Under 31
Projected
15–33
✓ ARMY won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: ARMY by 1 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
2-3 · #91
20
2-4 · #127
7
Spread
M-OH -11.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
47.5 ▲2
▼ Under 27
Projected
29–17
✓ M-OH won
Trend: M-OH ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: M-OH by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
3-2 · #48
23
2-3 · #120
28
Spread
TOL -10.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼4
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
29–19
✗ TOL lost
Trend: TOL ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: BGSU by 1 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
3-2 · #60
21
5-0 · #9
24
Spread
MISS -32.5
✓ WSU W ATS
Total
58.5 ▼1
▼ Under 45
Projected
12–45
✓ MISS won
Trend: MISS ATS ✗ Model: WSU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-4 · #124
10
1-5 · #123
16
Spread
NIU -1.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼1
▼ Under 26
Projected
25–23
✗ NIU lost
Trend: EMU ATS ✓ Model: NIU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
0-5 · #136
6
1-4 · #132
42
Spread
KENT -1.5
✓ KENT W ATS
Total
49.5
▼ Under 48
Projected
27–28
✓ KENT won
Trend: KENT ATS ✓ Model: MASS by 2 ✗ Model: Over 5.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-0 · #1
30
5-0 · #4
20
Spread
ORE -7.5
✓ IU W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼3
▼ Under 50
Projected
25–32
✗ ORE lost
Trend: Under ✓ Model: IU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Neutral
5-0 · #16
6
3-2 · #14
23
Spread
TEX -2.5
✓ TEX W ATS
Total
43.5 ▲1
▼ Under 29
Projected
21–24
✓ TEX won
Trend: OU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: TEX by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
2-4 · #73
20
5-0 · #39
35
Spread
GT -14.5
✓ GT W ATS
Total
55.5
▼ Under 55
Projected
19–33
✓ GT won
Trend: GT ATS ✓ Model: VT by 2 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
4-2 · #44
7
3-2 · #3
36
Spread
ND -24.5
✓ ND W ATS
Total
59.5 ▼3
▼ Under 43
Projected
17–41
✓ ND won
Trend: ND ATS ✓ Model: NCSU by 2 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
5-1 · #36
17
2-4 · #75
24
Spread
ISU -2.5
✓ COLO W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼1
▼ Under 41
Projected
26–24
✗ ISU lost
Trend: COLO ATS ✓ Model: COLO by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
3-2 · #59
22
3-2 · #17
21
Spread
PSU -20.5
✓ NU W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼2
▼ Under 43
Projected
13–34
✗ PSU lost
Trend: NU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: PSU by 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-1 · #45
34
4-1 · #72
31
Spread
NEB -6.5
✓ MD W ATS
Total
47.5
▲ Over 65 · Q3
Projected
27–21
✓ NEB won
Model: MD by 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
3-2 · #53
39
0-6 · #100
14
Spread
WAKE -1.5
✓ WAKE W ATS
Total
47.5 ▼5
▲ Over 53 · Q4
Projected
27–25
✓ WAKE won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: Over 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
TCU
4-1 · #33
28
2-4 · #42
41
Spread
TCU -2.5
✓ KSU W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼3
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
29–26
✗ TCU lost
Trend: Under ✗ Model: TCU by 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-4 · #95
48
UNLV
5-0 · #74
51
Spread
UNLV -7.5
✓ AFA W ATS
Total
66.5 ▼2
▲ Over 99 · Q4
Projected
28–36
✓ UNLV won
Trend: UNLV ATS ✗ Model: UNLV by 3.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-2 · #115
41
1-4 · #125
20
Spread
APP -2.5
✓ APP W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼1
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
30–27
✓ APP won
Trend: APP ATS ✓ Model: GAST by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-1 · #46
24
2-3 · #88
48
Spread
ODU -14.5
✓ MRSH W ATS
Total
57.5 ▲2
▲ Over 72 · Q4
Projected
35–20
✗ ODU lost
Trend: ODU ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: MRSH by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-3 · #133
0
3-3 · #80
42
Spread
WMU -9.5
✓ WMU W ATS
Total
42.5 ▼1
▼ Under 42
Projected
17–27
✓ WMU won
Model: WMU by 2 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Navy
5-0 · #64
32
3-2 · #96
31
Spread
NAVY -10.5
✓ TEM W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼1
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
31–21
✓ NAVY won
Trend: Over ✓ Model: TEM by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-3 · #40
31
4-1 · #22
34
Spread
TENN -10.5
✓ ARK W ATS
Total
68.5 ▼1
▼ Under 65
Projected
28–38
✓ TENN won
Trend: Over ✗ Model: ARK by 0 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UAB
2-3 · #119
33
2-3 · #108
53
Spread
FAU -5.5
✓ FAU W ATS
Total
65.5 ▼4
▲ Over 86 · Q3
Projected
30–36
✓ FAU won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: FAU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-3 · #37
17
5-0 · #10
34
Spread
TA&M -6.5
✓ TA&M W ATS
Total
48.5 ▲1
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
21–28
✓ TA&M won
Trend: FLA ATS ✗ Model: TA&M by 2.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Iowa
3-2 · #20
37
2-3 · #63
0
Spread
IOWA -4.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
37.5
▼ Under 37
Projected
22–18
✓ IOWA won
Trend: IOWA ATS ✓ Model: WIS by 2 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-3 · #106
28
2-3 · #107
35
Spread
SJSU -1.5
✓ WYO W ATS
Total
49.5
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
25–24
✗ SJSU lost
Trend: WYO ATS ✓ Model: WYO by 5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
3-2 · #130
8
2-3 · #122
23
Spread
ULM -2.5
✓ CCU W ATS
Total
45.5 ▲2
▼ Under 31
Projected
23–22
✗ ULM lost
Trend: ULM ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: CCU by 6.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-2 · #54
17
5-0 · #5
42
Spread
TTU -13.5
✓ TTU W ATS
Total
58.5 ▼2
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
22–36
✓ TTU won
Trend: TTU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: TTU by 1 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
4-1 · #7
20
3-2 · #24
10
Spread
UGA -4.5
✓ UGA W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼1
▼ Under 30
Projected
27–23
✓ UGA won
Trend: AUB ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: UGA by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
4-1 · #21
13
USC
4-1 · #12
31
Spread
USC -2.5
✓ USC W ATS
Total
57.5
▼ Under 44
Projected
28–31
✓ USC won
Trend: Over ✗ Model: USC by 4 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-3 · #79
20
3-2 · #69
27
Spread
MINN -7.5
✓ PUR W ATS
Total
49.5 ▼3
▼ Under 47
Projected
19–27
✓ MINN won
Trend: PUR ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: MINN by 1 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-3 · #34
41
1-4 · #84
10
Spread
CLEM -13.5
✓ CLEM W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼1
▼ Under 51
Projected
33–20
✓ CLEM won
Trend: BC ATS ✗ Model: BC by 3.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Rice
3-3 · #126
13
UTSA
2-3 · #65
61
Spread
UTSA -9.5
✓ UTSA W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼1
▲ Over 74 · Q3
Projected
20–30
✓ UTSA won
Trend: RICE ATS ✗ Model: UTSA by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-2 · #43
10
LSU
4-1 · #31
20
Spread
LSU -8.5
✓ LSU W ATS
Total
44.5
▼ Under 30
Projected
19–28
✓ LSU won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: LSU by 2 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
BYU
5-0 · #19
33
4-1 · #26
27
Spread
BYU -2.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼1
▲ Over 60 · Q4
Projected
26–23
✓ BYU won
Trend: ARIZ ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: BYU by 2 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: OT
Final · Conf
Troy
3-2 · #99
48
3-2 · #71
41
Spread
TXST -7.5
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼1
▲ Over 89 · Q3
Projected
23–31
✗ TXST lost
Trend: TROY ATS ✓ Model: TXST by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
3-2 · #81
25
3-2 · #55
41
Spread
BOIS -15.5
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
57.5 ▼3
▲ Over 66 · Q4
Projected
21–37
✓ BOIS won
Trend: BOIS ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
4-1 · #41
10
Utah
4-1 · #8
42
Spread
UTAH -8.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
Total
42.5 ▼6
▲ Over 52 · Q3
Projected
20–28
✓ UTAH won
Trend: UTAH ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: ASU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
4-1 · #68
44
1-4 · #121
10
Spread
SDSU -6.5
✓ SDSU W ATS
Total
42.5
▲ Over 54 · Q3
Projected
25–19
✓ SDSU won
Trend: NEV ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: NEV by 1 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-2 · #86
26
4-2 · #90
44
Spread
USU -1.5
✓ HAW W ATS
Total
57.5 ▼1
▲ Over 70 · Q4
Projected
29–28
✗ USU lost
Trend: USU ATS ✗ Model: HAW by 3 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total