1. Home
  2. NCAAF
  3. 2025 Week 9
NCAAF · 2025

NCAAF Week 9 games

FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 9: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results
53 finalFavorites 27-26 ATS13 upsetsO/U 32-21Model Favorite 40-13Week in numbers ›

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games5353 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS27-2651% covered
Upsets13outright
Over / Under32-2160% over
Model Favorite40-1375% won
Totals moved 1+ ptTap to filter
Moved up25 all 25 final
Over16 64%Under9 36%
Moved down19 all 19 final
Over11 58%Under8 42%
Did the team the spread moved toward cover? ATS vs the closing line, by how far it moved
Moved towardThis week20252024–2026
Any move
18–2641%
287–313–248%
789–801–850%
1.5+ pts
8–1142%
143–153–148%
446–443–450%
3+ pts
5–550%
78–74–151%
215–206–251%
5+ pts
0–10%
14–1352%
47–4551%
7+ pts
—
6–186%
13–765%
Covered–didn’t–push; % leaves out pushes and is grey under 10 games; green or red from 10 games. ClickTap a row or count to filter.
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Tuesday, Oct 21

2
Final · Conf
Kennesaw State
4-2 · #97
45
Florida International
3-3 · #109
26
Spread
KENN -2.5
✓ KENN W ATS
Total
49.5 ▲1
▲ Over 71 · Q4
Projected
25–23
✓ KENN won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: FIU by 4 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Western Kentucky
5-2 · #94
28
Louisiana Tech
4-2 · #93
27
Spread
LT -4.5
✓ WKU W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼2
▲ Over 55 · OT
Projected
23–28
✗ LT lost
Trend: LT ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: LT by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1

Wednesday, Oct 22

2
Final · Conf
Middle Tennessee
1-5 · #128
28
Delaware
3-3 · #117
31
Spread
DEL -9.5
✓ MTSU W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲3
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
22–32
✓ DEL won
Trend: MTSU ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: DEL by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Missouri State
3-3 · #112
24
New Mexico State
3-3 · #129
17
Spread
MOST -2.5
✓ MOST W ATS
Total
51.5 ▲7
▼ Under 41
Projected
26–24
✓ MOST won
Trend: Over ✗ Model: NMSU by 3.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: OT

Thursday, Oct 23

1
Final · Conf
South Alabama
1-6 · #102
38
Georgia State
1-6 · #125
31
Spread
USA -5.5
✓ USA W ATS
Total
54.5 ▲1
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
31–25
✓ USA won
Trend: USA ATS ✓ Model: GAST by 1 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1

Friday, Oct 24

3
Final · Conf
North Texas
6-1 · #38
54
Charlotte
1-6 · #134
20
Spread
UNT -25.5
✓ UNT W ATS
Total
60.5 ▲2
▲ Over 74 · Q4
Projected
43–17
✓ UNT won
Trend: UNT ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: UNT by 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
California
5-2 · #76
34
Virginia Tech
2-5 · #73
42
Spread
VT -6.5
✓ VT W ATS
Total
50.5 ▲1
▲ Over 76 · Q4
Projected
21–28
✓ VT won
Trend: CAL ATS ✗ Model: CAL by 1 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: OT
Final · Conf
Boise State
5-2 · #55
24
Nevada
1-6 · #121
3
Spread
BOIS -20.5
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼1
▼ Under 27
Projected
36–15
✓ BOIS won
Trend: BOIS ATS ✓ Model: BOIS by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4

Saturday, Oct 25

45
Final · Conf
UCLA
3-4 · #70
6
Indiana
7-0 · #1
56
Spread
IU -27.5
✓ IU W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲1
▲ Over 62 · Q3
Projected
12–40
✓ IU won
Model: IU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Syracuse
3-4 · #92
16
Georgia Tech
7-0 · #39
41
Spread
GT -17.5
✓ GT W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼1
▲ Over 57 · Q4
Projected
19–35
✓ GT won
Trend: GT ATS ✓ Model: SYR by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Ole Miss
6-1 · #9
34
Oklahoma
6-1 · #16
26
Spread
OU -5.5
✓ MISS W ATS
Total
52.5 ▲2
▲ Over 60 · Q4
Projected
25–30
✗ OU lost
Model: MISS by 3 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Virginia
6-1 · #32
17
North Carolina
2-4 · #89
16
Spread
UVA -12.5
✓ UNC W ATS
Total
51.5
▼ Under 33
Projected
34–21
✓ UVA won
Trend: UVA ATS ✗ Model: UVA by 1 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
South Florida
6-1 · #29
31
Memphis
6-1 · #61
34
Spread
USF -3.5
✓ MEM W ATS
Total
58.5 ▼10
▲ Over 65 · Q4
Projected
31–27
✗ USF lost
Trend: MEM ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: MEM by 2 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Northwestern
5-2 · #59
21
Nebraska
5-2 · #45
28
Spread
NEB -7.5
✓ NU W ATS
Total
44.5 ▲1
▲ Over 49 · Q4
Projected
18–26
✓ NEB won
Trend: NU ATS ✓ Model: NEB by 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Rutgers
3-4 · #62
27
Purdue
2-5 · #79
24
Spread
PUR -2.5
✓ RUTG W ATS
Total
60.5 ▲3
▼ Under 51
Projected
29–31
✗ PUR lost
Trend: PUR ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: RUTG by 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
SMU
5-2 · #27
12
Wake Forest
4-2 · #53
13
Spread
SMU -5.5
✓ WAKE W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼4
▼ Under 25
Projected
29–24
✗ SMU lost
Trend: WAKE ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: WAKE by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Kansas State
3-4 · #42
42
Kansas
4-3 · #54
17
Spread
KU -3.5
✓ KSU W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲1
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
26–29
✗ KU lost
Model: KU by 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
App State
4-3 · #115
21
Old Dominion
4-3 · #46
24
Spread
ODU -12.5
✓ APP W ATS
Total
60.5 ▲2
▼ Under 45
Projected
23–36
✓ ODU won
Trend: Over ✗ Model: ODU by 2 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Bowling Green
3-4 · #120
21
Kent State
2-5 · #132
24
Spread
BGSU -7.5
✓ KENT W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼4
▼ Under 45
Projected
29–21
✗ BGSU lost
Trend: Under ✓ Model: BGSU by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Ohio
4-3 · #78
28
Eastern Michigan
2-6 · #123
21
Spread
OHIO -13.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
60.5 ▲1
▼ Under 49
Projected
36–22
✓ OHIO won
Trend: OHIO ATS ✗ Model: EMU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Auburn
3-4 · #24
33
Arkansas
2-5 · #40
24
Spread
ARK -2.5
✓ AUB W ATS
Total
55.5
▲ Over 57 · Q4
Projected
27–29
✗ ARK lost
Trend: ARK ATS ✗ Model: AUB by 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Akron
2-6 · #127
24
Buffalo
4-3 · #118
16
Spread
BUFF -10.5
✓ AKR W ATS
Total
48.5 ▲1
▼ Under 40
Projected
18–29
✗ BUFF lost
Trend: AKR ATS ✓ Model: BUFF by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
UConn
5-2 · #87
34
Rice
3-4 · #126
37
Spread
CONN -9.5
✓ RICE W ATS
Total
48.5
▲ Over 71 · OT
Projected
30–20
✗ CONN lost
Trend: CONN ATS ✗ Model: CONN by 1 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Utah State
4-3 · #86
14
New Mexico
4-3 · #81
33
Spread
UNM -2.5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
60.5 ▼2
▼ Under 47
Projected
30–32
✓ UNM won
Trend: USU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: UNM by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Alabama
6-1 · #11
29
South Carolina
3-4 · #43
22
Spread
ALA -12.5
✓ SC W ATS
Total
47.5 ▲1
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
30–17
✓ ALA won
Trend: ALA ATS ✗ Model: ALA by 2 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Missouri
6-1 · #18
10
Vanderbilt
6-1 · #13
17
Spread
VAN -3.5
✓ VAN W ATS
Total
52.5
▼ Under 27
Projected
27–30
✓ VAN won
Trend: VAN ATS ✓ Model: MIZ by 4.5 ✗ Model: Over 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
BYU
7-0 · #19
41
Iowa State
5-2 · #36
27
Spread
ISU -2.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
49.5 ▲1
▲ Over 68 · Q3
Projected
23–25
✗ ISU lost
Trend: BYU ATS ✓ Model: BYU by 4 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Illinois
5-2 · #30
25
Washington
5-2 · #15
42
Spread
WASH -3.5
✓ WASH W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼1
▲ Over 67 · Q4
Projected
26–30
✓ WASH won
Trend: ILL ATS ✗ Model: WASH by 4 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Minnesota
5-2 · #69
3
Iowa
5-2 · #20
41
Spread
IOWA -7.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
39.5 ▲1
▲ Over 44 · Q4
Projected
14–23
✓ IOWA won
Trend: IOWA ATS ✓ Model: IOWA by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
Toledo
4-3 · #48
7
Washington State
3-4 · #60
28
Spread
TOL -1.5
✓ WSU W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼5
▼ Under 35
Projected
24–22
✗ TOL lost
Trend: TOL ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: TOL by 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
NC State
4-3 · #44
34
Pittsburgh
5-2 · #35
53
Spread
PITT -5.5
✓ PITT W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼2
▲ Over 87 · Q3
Projected
25–31
✓ PITT won
Trend: PITT ATS ✓ Model: PITT by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
San Diego State
5-1 · #68
23
Fresno State
5-2 · #82
0
Spread
SDSU -3.5
✓ SDSU W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼3
▼ Under 23
Projected
24–21
✓ SDSU won
Trend: SDSU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: FRES by 1 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UL Monroe
3-4 · #130
21
Southern Miss
5-2 · #98
49
Spread
USM -13.5
✓ USM W ATS
Total
48.5
▲ Over 70 · Q3
Projected
19–32
✓ USM won
Trend: USM ATS ✓ Model: ULM by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Florida Atlantic
3-4 · #108
32
Navy
6-0 · #64
42
Spread
NAVY -14.5
✓ FAU W ATS
Total
63.5 ▲1
▲ Over 74 · Q4
Projected
24–38
✓ NAVY won
Trend: NAVY ATS ✗ Model: FAU by 0 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Temple
4-3 · #96
38
Tulsa
2-5 · #113
37
Spread
TEM -3.5
✓ TLSA W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼1
▲ Over 75 · Q4
Projected
27–23
✓ TEM won
Trend: TEM ATS ✗ Model: TEM by 3.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Ball State
3-4 · #133
7
Northern Illinois
1-6 · #124
21
Spread
NIU -6.5
✓ NIU W ATS
Total
42.5 ▲1
▼ Under 28
Projected
17–24
✓ NIU won
Trend: BALL ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: NIU by 2 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Massachusetts
0-7 · #136
13
Central Michigan
4-3 · #103
38
Spread
CMU -17.5
✓ CMU W ATS
Total
46.5
▲ Over 51 · Q3
Projected
16–33
✓ CMU won
Trend: CMU ATS ✓ Model: CMU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Western Michigan
4-3 · #80
17
Miami (OH)
4-3 · #91
26
Spread
M-OH -2.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
40.5 ▼1
▲ Over 43 · Q4
Projected
19–21
✓ M-OH won
Model: WMU by 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Oklahoma State
1-6 · #111
0
Texas Tech
6-1 · #5
42
Spread
TTU -35.5
✓ TTU W ATS
Total
56.5 ▼1
▼ Under 42
Projected
10–47
✓ TTU won
Trend: TTU ATS ✓ Model: TTU by 7 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Baylor
4-3 · #50
20
Cincinnati
6-1 · #58
41
Spread
CIN -3.5
✓ CIN W ATS
Total
69.5 ▲3
▼ Under 61
Projected
31–35
✓ CIN won
Trend: Over ✗ Model: CIN by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Texas
5-2 · #14
45
Mississippi State
4-3 · #56
38
Spread
TEX -8.5
✓ MSST W ATS
Total
49.5 ▲4
▲ Over 83 · Q4
Projected
29–20
✓ TEX won
Trend: MSST ATS ✓ Model: TEX by 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
TCU
5-2 · #33
23
West Virginia
2-5 · #77
17
Spread
TCU -16.5
✓ WVU W ATS
Total
55.5
▼ Under 40
Projected
37–21
✓ TCU won
Trend: TCU ATS ✗ Model: WVU by 4.5 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Wisconsin
2-5 · #63
7
Oregon
6-1 · #4
21
Spread
ORE -31.5
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
45.5 ▲3
▼ Under 28
Projected
6–38
✓ ORE won
Trend: ORE ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: ORE by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Stanford
3-4 · #85
7
Miami
5-1 · #6
42
Spread
MIA -28.5
✓ MIA W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼3
▲ Over 49 · Q4
Projected
9–38
✓ MIA won
Trend: MIA ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: MIA by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Georgia Southern
3-4 · #105
24
Arkansas State
3-4 · #110
34
Spread
ARST -1.5
✓ ARST W ATS
Total
59.5 ▼3
▼ Under 58
Projected
28–30
✓ ARST won
Trend: ARST ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: ARST by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Louisiana
2-5 · #114
23
Troy
5-2 · #99
35
Spread
TROY -7.5
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
47.5 ▼3
▲ Over 58 · Q3
Projected
21–29
✓ TROY won
Trend: TROY ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: TROY by 3 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Texas A&M
7-0 · #10
49
LSU
5-2 · #31
25
Spread
TA&M -1.5
✓ TA&M W ATS
Total
49.5 ▲1
▲ Over 74 · Q3
Projected
26–24
✓ TA&M won
Model: TA&M by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Boston College
1-6 · #84
24
Louisville
5-1 · #25
38
Spread
LOU -25.5
✓ BC W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼1
▲ Over 62 · Q4
Projected
16–41
✓ LOU won
Model: BC by 3 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Michigan
5-2 · #21
31
Michigan State
3-4 · #67
20
Spread
MICH -13.5
✓ MSU W ATS
Total
47.5 ▼1
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
31–17
✓ MICH won
Model: MICH by 3 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Colorado State
2-5 · #116
0
Wyoming
3-4 · #107
28
Spread
WYO -5.5
✓ WYO W ATS
Total
46.5 ▲1
▼ Under 28
Projected
20–25
✓ WYO won
Trend: CSU ATS ✗ Model: CSU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Tennessee
5-2 · #22
56
Kentucky
2-4 · #52
34
Spread
TENN -7.5
✓ TENN W ATS
Total
54.5 ▲1
▲ Over 90 · Q2
Projected
32–24
✓ TENN won
Model: TENN by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Houston
6-1 · #49
24
Arizona State
5-2 · #41
16
Spread
ASU -7.5
✓ HOU W ATS
Total
47.5
▼ Under 40
Projected
19–27
✗ ASU lost
Model: ASU by 5 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Colorado
3-4 · #75
7
Utah
5-2 · #8
53
Spread
UTAH -14.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
Total
50.5
▲ Over 60 · Q4
Projected
17–32
✓ UTAH won
Model: UTAH by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total