Fri, Oct 24, 2025, 7:00 PM EDTWeek 9 · at Charlotte · Conference game
Weather at kickoff58°F3 mphgusts 8DryWeather watch ›
6-1 · Power #38
54
▲ winner
Final
@
1-6 · Power #134
20
final
Closing spread
UNT -25.5
✓ UNT W
Total
60.5
▲ Over · 74 pts
Model before kickoff
UNT 43–17 CLT
✓ UNT (97%) won
Closing line · ESPN BET
SourceESPN BET closing line
OpenUNT -26.5
CloseUNT -25.5
Total58.5 → 60.5
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.
Loading the recap…

Market

Open → close
Spread
1 pt toward Charlotte
Total
Up 2 since the open
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UNT -26.5 · closed UNT -25.5 · moved 1 toward CLTmodel UNT -26.5
Opened 58.5 · closed 60.5 · moved 2 upmodel 60.5 matches the line
Openline modelKickoff
Line context
Lines that moved 1–1.5 pts toward the underdog: that team covered 49% (243 games since 2024)ⓘ
Closing line · ESPN BET
SourceESPN BET closing line
OpenUNT -26.5
CloseUNT -25.5
Total58.5 → 60.5
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.

Similar games

The recent games that looked most like this one before kickoff, and how they turned out

In the 10 games most like UNT as a 25.5-point road favorite at CLT, the favorite won 10, covered 4, and 3 went over the total.

Compare by
Customize filters
Only include
Show up to
games
This game: UNT won 54–20; the favorite covered, as in 4 of the 10 similar games. 74 points went over 60.5, as in 3 of 10.
Favorite won
10 of 10100%
Normal range · usually 92%
Favorite covered
4 of 1040%
Normal range · usually 48%
Went over
3 of 1030%
Normal range · usually 53%

All three sit in the normal range for favorites of this size, so history shows no clear lean. Average result: favorite by 21.5 against an average line of 25.7; 53.7 points a game (usually 55.1). Of the 2 overs, 0 had cashed by the end of Q3. When games like this go over ›

All 10 games
MatchGameLineFinalCoveredO/U
Close
2023 · Week 9 · close · similar total & rest
-27.542–33 L O62
Close
ORE @ COLO
2022 · Week 10 · close · similar total & rest
-3149–10 W U62.5
Close
2024 · Week 7 · close · similar rest & spread
-2745–3 W U53.5
Loose
2023 · Week 12 · loose · similar rest & total
-24.531–24 L U58.5
Loose
2025 · Week 3 · loose · similar rest
-28.528–10 L U60.5
Loose
2025 · Week 8 · loose · similar rest & season form
-23.549–17 W O57.5
Loose
2024 · Week 13 · loose · similar rest & situation
-2435–14 L U54
Loose
2025 · Week 3 · loose · similar rest & season form
-2124–16 L U55.5
Loose
2024 · Week 13 · loose · similar season form & rest
-2217–13 L U54
Loose
MD @ CLT
2022 · Week 2 · loose · similar rest
-2856–21 W O65
History, not a prediction. Every FBS game from 2022 on is compared with this one as it looked before kickoff (team strength, the betting line, season form, situation, venue and rest), and only close matches are kept. How matches are found

Signals

The data signal, and 3 trends and market moves behind it
Moderate North Texas ATS trend Hit
Moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) in our 2023–26 backtest.
Slight Over trend Hit
Slight-or-stronger total leans went 509-553 (48%) in our 2023–26 backtest.

None of these signals has beaten the market in our backtest, so this describes why the matchup is interesting — it isn’t a pick.

North Texas ATS trend (5-2)
North Texas have covered 71% of their games with a line this season. · Backtest 2023–26: 338-337 (50%)
Charlotte home ATS weakness (1-3)
Weak against the spread at home this season. · Backtest 2023–26: 216-236 (48%)
Total moved up 2
58.5 → 60.5. · Backtest 2024–26: 462-498 (48%)
Loading play-by-play…

Matchup stats

Season to date before kickoff · ranks among 137 FBS teams
Power rating this season
pts vs an average team · #rank · tap a dot
UNT−6.2 →+5.4▲ 11.6#50
CLT−11.9 →−21.6▼ 9.7#134
Predashed line = average team · hover or tap a dotW8

UNT
Longer bar = better
CLT
#19
Offense
◀ UNT better
#126
#59
Defense
◀ UNT better
#124
+1.3 #5
Turnovers
◀ UNT better
−1.4 #134
72 plays #25
Pace
◀ UNT faster
67 plays #68
Unit by unitEach offense against the other's defense
When UNT has the ball
Advantage: UNT offense
UNT offCLT defEdge
Points / game 45.0 #1 34.9 #128 UNT
Yards / play 6.41 #32 6.19 #118 UNT
PPA / play +0.28 #16 +0.19 #112 UNT
Success rate 47% #27 51% #137 UNT
When CLT has the ball
Advantage: UNT defense
CLT offUNT defEdge
Points / game 17.1 #129 25.7 #81 UNT
Yards / play 4.72 #128 5.05 #37 UNT
PPA / play −0.04 #127 0.00 #29 UNT
Success rate 38% #118 43% #88 UNT

Points by quarter and half

Per game this season before kickoff · ranks among 136 FBS teams
UNT scoring against the CLT defense
Q1Q21HQ3Q42H
UNT scored
12.3
#3
12.4
#15
24.7
#4
11.3
#4
7.1
#67
18.4
#12
CLT allowed
8.7
#124
11.3
#126
20.0
#131
7.4
#112
7.4
#89
14.9
#118
CLT scoring against the UNT defense
Q1Q21HQ3Q42H
CLT scored
1.9
#133
3.3
#132
5.1
#135
3.4
#118
8.6
#38
12.0
#87
UNT allowed
4.4
#53
6.4
#57
10.9
#49
7.4
#112
7.0
#80
14.4
#108

Game conditions

At kickoff
Home field
CLT +2.5
home-field points in the model
Weather
58° · 3 mph
gusts 8 mph · at kickoff
Rest
UNT6d
CLT6d
Even
Tempo
Average 138 plays
slowavg 134fast