FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 13: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games6565 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS32-3052% covered
Upsets14outright
Over / Under41-2364% over
Model Favorite50-1577% won
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Tuesday, Nov 21

2
Final · Conf
6-5 · #80
34
4-7 · #120
10
Spread
BGSU -2.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
51.5
▼ Under 44
Projected
27–25
✓ BGSU won
Trend: BGSU ATS ✓ Model: BGSU by 1 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-6 · #126
24
3-8 · #119
11
Spread
BUFF -5.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
37.5
▼ Under 35
Projected
17–23
✗ BUFF lost
Trend: EMU ATS ✓ Model: BUFF by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1

Thursday, Nov 23

1
Final · Conf
9-2 · #16
17
5-6 · #64
7
Spread
MISS -10
Push
Total
54.5
▼ Under 24
Projected
32–21
✓ MISS won
Trend: MISS ATS Model: MISS by 2.5 Model: Under 1.5 ✓

Friday, Nov 24

13
Final · Conf
TCU
5-6 · #30
45
9-2 · #9
69
Spread
OU -10.5
✓ OU W ATS
Total
65.5
▲ Over 114 · Q3
Projected
25–37
✓ OU won
Trend: OU ATS ✓ Model: OU by 4.5 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Iowa
9-2 · #54
13
5-6 · #62
10
Spread
—
 
Total
—
 
Projected
13–13
✗ NEB lost
Final · Conf
6-5 · #25
45
6-5 · #75
20
Spread
MIA -10
✓ MIA W ATS
Total
50
▲ Over 65 · Q4
Projected
30–20
✓ MIA won
Trend: MIA ATS ✓ Model: BC by 1 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
8-3 · #50
45
3-8 · #128
21
Spread
MEM -13
✓ MEM W ATS
Total
64
▲ Over 66 · Q4
Projected
37–23
✓ MEM won
Trend: MEM ATS ✓ Model: MEM by 4 ✓ Model: Under 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
10-1 · #58
32
5-6 · #122
17
Spread
TOL -10
✓ TOL W ATS
Total
55
▼ Under 49
Projected
32–22
✓ TOL won
Trend: TOL ATS ✓ Model: TOL by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Ohio
8-3 · #63
25
2-9 · #130
14
Spread
OHIO -16
✓ AKR W ATS
Total
41.5
▼ Under 39
Projected
28–13
✓ OHIO won
Trend: OHIO ATS ✗ Model: AKR by 2.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UTSA
8-3 · #56
16
10-1 · #55
29
Spread
TULN -3.5
✓ TULN W ATS
Total
53.5
▼ Under 45
Projected
24–28
✓ TULN won
Trend: UTSA ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: TULN by 1 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
5-6 · #100
44
4-7 · #117
41
Spread
USU -5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
59
▲ Over 85 · Q4
Projected
32–27
✓ USU won
Trend: USU ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: UNM by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
9-2 · #12
48
4-7 · #59
14
Spread
MIZ -10
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
54
▲ Over 62 · Q4
Projected
30–21
✓ MIZ won
Trend: MIZ ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: ARK by 2 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
8-3 · #52
19
6-5 · #48
27
Spread
BOIS -7
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
44.5
▲ Over 46 · Q4
Projected
22–28
✓ BOIS won
Trend: BOIS ATS ✓ Model: AFA by 4 ✗ Model: Over 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
6-5 · #45
7
10-1 · #8
57
Spread
TEX -15.5
✓ TEX W ATS
Total
53.5
▲ Over 64 · Q3
Projected
19–35
✓ TEX won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: TTU by 0 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
9-2 · #5
42
4-7 · #98
0
Spread
PSU -22.5
✓ PSU W ATS
Total
43
▼ Under 42
Projected
34–11
✓ PSU won
Trend: PSU ATS ✓ Model: PSU by 2 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
8-3 · #20
7
10-1 · #2
31
Spread
ORE -14
✓ ORE W ATS
Total
61.5
▼ Under 38
Projected
24–38
✓ ORE won
Trend: ORE ATS ✓ Model: ORST by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3

Saturday, Nov 25

49
Final · Conf
11-0 · #4
24
11-0 · #3
30
Spread
MICH -3
✓ MICH W ATS
Total
46
▲ Over 54 · Q4
Projected
23–27
✓ MICH won
Trend: OSU ATS ✗ Model: MICH by 1 ✓ Model: Over 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
6-5 · #44
38
10-1 · #21
31
Spread
LOU -7.5
✓ UK W ATS
Total
48
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
22–30
✗ LOU lost
Trend: LOU ATS ✗ Model: LOU by 5 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-4 · #17
30
LSU
8-3 · #10
42
Spread
LSU -13
✓ TA&M W ATS
Total
67
▲ Over 72 · Q4
Projected
27–39
✓ LSU won
Trend: LSU ATS ✗ Model: TA&M by 5.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-8 · #89
31
3-8 · #66
35
Spread
PUR -6.5
✓ IU W ATS
Total
55.5
▲ Over 66 · Q4
Projected
24–31
✓ PUR won
Model: PUR by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-7 · #99
20
2-9 · #114
23
Spread
MTSU -3.5
✓ SHSU W ATS
Total
50.5
▼ Under 43
Projected
24–21
✗ MTSU lost
Trend: MTSU ATS ✗ Model: SHSU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
2-9 · #125
31
3-8 · #127
18
Spread
MASS -2.5
✓ CONN W ATS
Total
51
▼ Under 49
Projected
26–29
✗ MASS lost
Trend: CONN ATS ✓ Model: MASS by 1 ✗ Model: Over 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-8 · #77
19
Duke
6-5 · #37
30
Spread
DUKE -4.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
41.5
▲ Over 49 · Q4
Projected
18–24
✓ DUKE won
Trend: DUKE ATS ✓ Model: DUKE by 7.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
4-7 · #88
13
UCF
5-6 · #31
27
Spread
UCF -16
✓ HOU W ATS
Total
61
▼ Under 40
Projected
22–37
✓ UCF won
Trend: UCF ATS ✗ Model: HOU by 1 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Navy
5-5 · #108
14
SMU
9-2 · #22
59
Spread
SMU -19.5
✓ SMU W ATS
Total
46
▲ Over 73 · Q2
Projected
12–32
✓ SMU won
Trend: SMU ATS ✓ Model: SMU by 4 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Troy
9-2 · #29
35
3-8 · #121
17
Spread
TROY -17
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
48
▲ Over 52 · Q4
Projected
33–16
✓ TROY won
Trend: TROY ATS ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
5-6 · #94
37
1-10 · #133
27
Spread
NIU -20.5
✓ KENT W ATS
Total
45.5
▲ Over 64 · Q4
Projected
34–15
✓ NIU won
Trend: NIU ATS ✗ Model: KENT by 5 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
9-2 · #78
17
4-7 · #113
15
Spread
M-OH -3.5
✓ BALL W ATS
Total
34.5
▼ Under 32
Projected
22–18
✓ M-OH won
Trend: M-OH ATS ✗ Model: M-OH by 4 ✗ Model: Over 5.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
4-7 · #105
21
Rice
5-6 · #90
24
Spread
RICE -3
Push
Total
47.5
▼ Under 45
Projected
23–27
✓ RICE won
Trend: RICE ATS Model: RICE by 4.5 Model: Over 3 ✗
Final · Conf
4-7 · #81
31
5-6 · #82
35
Spread
SYR -1.5
✓ SYR W ATS
Total
43.5
▲ Over 66 · Q4
Projected
23–25
✓ SYR won
Trend: SYR ATS ✓ Model: SYR by 4 ✓ Model: Over 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
3-8 · #118
29
2-9 · #110
27
Spread
ECU -3
✓ TLSA W ATS
Total
43.5
▲ Over 56 · Q2
Projected
21–24
✗ ECU lost
Trend: TLSA ATS ✓ Model: ECU by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
UAB
4-7 · #102
42
4-7 · #103
45
Spread
UNT -2
✓ UNT W ATS
Total
72
▲ Over 87 · Q4
Projected
34–37
✓ UNT won
Model: UNT by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
6-5 · #91
24
5-6 · #97
25
Spread
ODU -1.5
✓ GAST W ATS
Total
51.5
▼ Under 49
Projected
25–26
✓ ODU won
Trend: ODU ATS ✗ Model: ODU by 1 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-5 · #83
41
4-7 · #131
28
Spread
WKU -11
✓ WKU W ATS
Total
54
▲ Over 69 · Q3
Projected
33–22
✓ WKU won
Trend: FIU ATS ✗ Model: FIU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-7 · #72
17
Utah
7-4 · #33
23
Spread
UTAH -21.5
✓ COLO W ATS
Total
43
▼ Under 40
Projected
16–35
✓ UTAH won
Trend: UTAH ATS ✗ Model: COLO by 8.5 ✓ Model: Over 8 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-9 · #129
21
5-6 · #87
52
Spread
UL -12.5
✓ UL W ATS
Total
53
▲ Over 73 · Q3
Projected
21–34
✓ UL won
Trend: ULM ATS ✗ Model: UL by 1 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
6-5 · #60
37
UNLV
9-2 · #68
31
Spread
UNLV -1
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
58.5
▲ Over 68 · Q4
Projected
29–30
✗ UNLV lost
Trend: UNLV ATS ✗ Model: UNLV by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
10-1 · #7
27
6-5 · #40
24
Spread
ALA -13.5
✓ AUB W ATS
Total
47.5
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
29–16
✓ ALA won
Trend: ALA ATS ✗ Model: AUB by 3 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-3 · #18
59
3-8 · #101
23
Spread
ARIZ -13.5
✓ ARIZ W ATS
Total
50
▲ Over 82 · Q3
Projected
32–18
✓ ARIZ won
Trend: ARIZ ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: ARIZ by 1 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
BYU
5-6 · #86
34
8-3 · #43
40
Spread
OKST -16.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
55.5
▲ Over 74 · OT
Projected
18–33
✓ OKST won
Trend: OKST ATS ✗ Model: BYU by 3 ✓ Model: Under 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-9 · #111
24
7-4 · #15
48
Spread
TENN -28
✓ VAN W ATS
Total
57.5
▲ Over 72 · Q4
Projected
14–42
✓ TENN won
Trend: TENN ATS ✗ Model: VAN by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
11-0 · #32
42
UTEP
3-8 · #115
28
Spread
LIB -18
✓ UTEP W ATS
Total
55
▲ Over 70 · Q4
Projected
34–16
✓ LIB won
Trend: LIB ATS ✗ Model: UTEP by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
6-5 · #65
45
5-6 · #67
43
Spread
ILL -6
✓ NU W ATS
Total
47
▲ Over 88 · Q3
Projected
21–27
✗ ILL lost
Trend: NU ATS ✓ Model: NU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-5 · #42
28
5-6 · #79
14
Spread
WIS -3
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
46
▼ Under 42
Projected
25–22
✓ WIS won
Trend: WIS ATS ✓ Model: WIS by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
6-5 · #27
42
6-5 · #51
24
Spread
MD -2
✓ MD W ATS
Total
45
▲ Over 66 · Q3
Projected
24–23
✓ MD won
Trend: RUTG ATS ✗ Model: RUTG by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-6 · #41
55
3-8 · #85
17
Spread
VT -1.5
✓ VT W ATS
Total
53
▲ Over 72 · Q3
Projected
26–24
✓ VT won
Trend: UVA ATS ✗ Model: VT by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-5 · #92
27
7-4 · #61
55
Spread
APP -10
✓ APP W ATS
Total
63
▲ Over 82 · Q4
Projected
27–37
✓ APP won
Trend: APP ATS ✓ Model: GASO by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
10-1 · #28
56
7-4 · #70
14
Spread
JMU -4
✓ JMU W ATS
Total
51.5
▲ Over 70 · Q4
Projected
27–23
✓ JMU won
Trend: CCU ATS ✗ Model: JMU by 1 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-5 · #107
21
5-6 · #96
35
Spread
MRSH -1.5
✓ MRSH W ATS
Total
52.5
▲ Over 56 · Q4
Projected
25–27
✓ MRSH won
Trend: ARST ATS ✗ Model: MRSH by 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-6 · #46
21
11-0 · #13
24
Spread
WASH -15.5
✓ WSU W ATS
Total
65
▼ Under 45
Projected
24–39
✓ WASH won
Model: WASH by 0 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-3 · #69
17
9-3 · #84
20
Spread
JXST -2.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
48
▼ Under 37
Projected
23–22
✗ JXST lost
Trend: NMSU ATS ✓ Model: NMSU by 6.5 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
11-0 · #14
24
5-6 · #36
15
Spread
FSU -6.5
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
49
▼ Under 39
Projected
32–25
✓ FSU won
Model: FSU by 4.5 ✓ Model: Over 8.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
8-3 · #6
56
3-8 · #106
23
Spread
ND -26
✓ ND W ATS
Total
50
▲ Over 79 · Q3
Projected
39–14
✓ ND won
Trend: ND ATS ✓ Model: STAN by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
7-4 · #39
34
3-8 · #93
31
Spread
WVU -12
✓ BAY W ATS
Total
54.5
▲ Over 65 · Q3
Projected
34–23
✓ WVU won
Trend: WVU ATS ✗ Model: BAY by 5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
6-5 · #49
44
6-5 · #73
52
Spread
USA -6
✓ TXST W ATS
Total
57
▲ Over 96 · Q3
Projected
32–26
✗ USA lost
Model: TXST by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
11-0 · #1
31
6-5 · #53
23
Spread
UGA -24.5
✓ GT W ATS
Total
59.5
▼ Under 54
Projected
42–18
✓ UGA won
Model: GT by 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
7-4 · #19
16
5-6 · #47
7
Spread
CLEM -7.5
✓ CLEM W ATS
Total
47.5
▼ Under 23
Projected
29–22
✓ CLEM won
Trend: SC ATS ✗ Model: SC by 2 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
7-4 · #24
49
3-8 · #76
16
Spread
KU -7.5
✓ KU W ATS
Total
58.5
▲ Over 65 · Q4
Projected
33–26
✓ KU won
Trend: CIN ATS ✗ Model: CIN by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
3-8 · #124
14
5-6 · #95
48
Spread
USF -7
✓ USF W ATS
Total
57
▲ Over 62 · Q4
Projected
24–31
✓ USF won
Trend: CLT ATS ✗ Model: CLT by 3 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
6-5 · #35
42
8-3 · #11
35
Spread
KSU -9.5
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
47
▲ Over 77 · Q3
Projected
19–29
✗ KSU lost
Trend: KSU ATS ✗ Model: KSU by 5.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-3 · #34
20
8-3 · #38
39
Spread
UNC -2.5
✓ NCSU W ATS
Total
55.5
▲ Over 59 · Q3
Projected
29–27
✗ UNC lost
Model: UNC by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-4 · #74
42
2-9 · #132
6
Spread
WYO -11.5
✓ WYO W ATS
Total
41.5
▲ Over 48 · Q4
Projected
27–16
✓ WYO won
Model: NEV by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-6 · #57
33
UCLA
7-4 · #26
7
Spread
UCLA -9.5
✓ CAL W ATS
Total
50.5
▼ Under 40
Projected
21–31
✗ UCLA lost
Model: UCLA by 2 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
8-3 · #71
18
3-8 · #112
33
Spread
FRES -4.5
✓ SDSU W ATS
Total
46.5
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
28–22
✗ FRES lost
Model: FRES by 4 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-6 · #109
24
4-8 · #123
27
Spread
CSU -5.5
✓ HAW W ATS
Total
53.5
▼ Under 51
Projected
29–25
✗ CSU lost
Trend: CSU ATS ✗ Model: HAW by 4.5 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total