FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 9: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games5454 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS23-2944% covered
Upsets15outright
Over / Under32-2160% over
Model Favorite38-1670% won
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Tuesday, Oct 24

2
Final · Conf
5-3 · #84
27
3-5 · #116
24
Spread
LT -3
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
55
▼ Under 51
Projected
25–28
✗ LT lost
Trend: NMSU ATS ✓ Model: NMSU by 2 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
7-0 · #32
42
4-3 · #83
29
Spread
LIB -4
✓ LIB W ATS
Total
61.5
▲ Over 71 · Q4
Projected
34–30
✓ LIB won
Trend: LIB ATS ✓ Model: LIB by 2 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3

Wednesday, Oct 25

2
Final · Conf
6-2 · #69
41
4-4 · #131
16
Spread
JXST -9
✓ JXST W ATS
Total
48
▲ Over 57 · Q4
Projected
26–18
✓ JXST won
Trend: JXST ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: FIU by 2 ✗ Model: Under 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UTEP
2-6 · #115
37
0-7 · #114
34
Spread
SHSU -4
✓ UTEP W ATS
Total
38.5
▲ Over 71 · Q3
Projected
17–21
✗ SHSU lost
Trend: SHSU ATS ✗ Model: SHSU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q4

Thursday, Oct 26

2
Final · Conf
4-3 · #82
10
3-4 · #41
38
Spread
VT -2.5
✓ VT W ATS
Total
47.5
▲ Over 48 · Q4
Projected
23–25
✓ VT won
Trend: VT ATS ✓ Model: SYR by 2 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-1 · #91
27
5-2 · #92
44
Spread
Pick’em
✓ GASO W ATS
Total
63
▲ Over 71 · Q4
Projected
31–32
✓ GASO won
Trend: GAST ATS ✗ Cover settled: Q1

Friday, Oct 27

1
Final · Conf
3-4 · #105
38
2-5 · #124
16
Spread
FAU -3.5
✓ FAU W ATS
Total
45.5
▲ Over 54 · Q3
Projected
25–22
✓ FAU won
Trend: CLT ATS ✗ Model: CLT by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1

Saturday, Oct 28

47
Final · Conf
7-0 · #14
41
4-3 · #81
16
Spread
FSU -21
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
53.5
▲ Over 57 · Q4
Projected
37–17
✓ FSU won
Trend: FSU ATS ✓ Model: WAKE by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
7-0 · #9
33
5-2 · #24
38
Spread
OU -7.5
✓ KU W ATS
Total
66.5
▲ Over 71 · Q4
Projected
37–28
✗ OU lost
Trend: OU ATS ✗ Model: OU by 6.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-5 · #89
24
6-1 · #5
33
Spread
PSU -31
✓ IU W ATS
Total
45
▲ Over 57 · Q4
Projected
7–38
✓ PSU won
Trend: PSU ATS ✗ Model: PSU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-7 · #127
21
Army
2-5 · #104
14
Spread
ARMY -10
✓ MASS W ATS
Total
49.5
▼ Under 35
Projected
20–30
✗ ARMY lost
Trend: Over ✗ Model: ARMY by 1 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-6 · #125
14
4-3 · #75
21
Spread
BC -14.5
✓ CONN W ATS
Total
49
▼ Under 35
Projected
18–32
✓ BC won
Trend: CONN ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: CONN by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-2 · #27
27
3-4 · #65
33
Spread
MD -14
✓ NU W ATS
Total
48.5
▲ Over 60 · Q4
Projected
31–18
✗ MD lost
Model: NU by 3 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-5 · #47
17
4-3 · #17
30
Spread
TA&M -17
✓ SC W ATS
Total
51.5
▼ Under 47
Projected
18–35
✓ TA&M won
Trend: TA&M ATS ✗ Model: SC by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-4 · #88
0
5-2 · #11
41
Spread
KSU -18
✓ KSU W ATS
Total
60.5
▼ Under 41
Projected
18–37
✓ KSU won
Trend: KSU ATS ✓ Model: KSU by 2 ✓ Model: Under 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
4-3 · #39
41
UCF
3-4 · #31
28
Spread
UCF -6.5
✓ WVU W ATS
Total
59
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
24–30
✗ UCF lost
Model: WVU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-4 · #118
10
SMU
5-2 · #22
69
Spread
SMU -20.5
✓ SMU W ATS
Total
55
▲ Over 79 · Q3
Projected
17–38
✓ SMU won
Trend: SMU ATS ✓ Model: SMU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-6 · #120
45
4-4 · #126
21
Spread
WMU -3
✓ WMU W ATS
Total
50
▲ Over 66 · Q4
Projected
26–24
✓ WMU won
Trend: EMU ATS ✗ Model: EMU by 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-3 · #19
17
4-3 · #38
24
Spread
CLEM -10
✓ NCSU W ATS
Total
44.5
▼ Under 41
Projected
28–19
✗ CLEM lost
Model: NCSU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-2 · #50
45
3-4 · #103
42
Spread
MEM -6.5
✓ UNT W ATS
Total
69.5
▲ Over 87 · Q4
Projected
37–30
✓ MEM won
Trend: UNT ATS ✓ Model: MEM by 2 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Neutral
7-0 · #1
43
5-2 · #36
20
Spread
UGA -14
✓ UGA W ATS
Total
50
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
32–19
✓ UGA won
Trend: FLA ATS ✗ Model: FLA by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
BYU
5-2 · #86
6
6-1 · #8
35
Spread
TEX -20.5
✓ TEX W ATS
Total
48.5
▼ Under 41
Projected
13–34
✓ TEX won
Model: TEX by 4.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
6-1 · #2
35
Utah
6-1 · #33
6
Spread
ORE -6.5
✓ ORE W ATS
Total
47
▼ Under 41
Projected
26–20
✓ ORE won
Model: UTAH by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
2-5 · #77
7
6-2 · #6
58
Spread
ND -21
✓ ND W ATS
Total
45.5
▲ Over 65 · Q4
Projected
13–34
✓ ND won
Trend: ND ATS ✓ Model: ND by 0 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
Duke
5-2 · #37
0
6-1 · #21
23
Spread
LOU -4.5
✓ LOU W ATS
Total
47
▼ Under 23
Projected
24–27
✓ LOU won
Trend: LOU ATS ✓ Model: DUKE by 4 ✗ Model: Over 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-3 · #64
13
3-4 · #40
27
Spread
AUB -6.5
✓ AUB W ATS
Total
40
Push 40
Projected
19–26
✓ AUB won
Trend: AUB ATS ✓ Model: MSST by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-5 · #98
12
4-3 · #79
27
Spread
MINN -6.5
✓ MINN W ATS
Total
41.5
▼ Under 39
Projected
19–26
✓ MINN won
Trend: MSU ATS ✗ Model: MINN by 2 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
2-5 · #66
14
4-3 · #62
31
Spread
PUR -1.5
✓ NEB W ATS
Total
39.5
▲ Over 45 · Q4
Projected
22–21
✗ PUR lost
Model: NEB by 5.5 ✓ Model: Over 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-5 · #85
26
5-2 · #25
29
Spread
MIA -18.5
✓ UVA W ATS
Total
48
▲ Over 55 · OT
Projected
14–33
✓ MIA won
Trend: UVA ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: MIA by 1 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-3 · #35
30
3-4 · #93
18
Spread
ISU -3
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
47
▲ Over 48 · Q4
Projected
24–21
✓ ISU won
Trend: ISU ATS ✓ Model: ISU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-6 · #110
27
UTSA
4-3 · #56
41
Spread
UTSA -17.5
✓ ECU W ATS
Total
48
▲ Over 68 · Q2
Projected
15–32
✓ UTSA won
Trend: UTSA ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: ECU by 5.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-6 · #121
38
3-4 · #61
48
Spread
APP -16
✓ USM W ATS
Total
55.5
▲ Over 86 · Q3
Projected
20–36
✓ APP won
Trend: APP ATS ✗ Model: USM by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-2 · #78
30
Ohio
6-2 · #63
16
Spread
OHIO -7.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
39
▲ Over 46 · Q4
Projected
18–25
✗ OHIO lost
Trend: M-OH ATS ✓ Model: M-OH by 3 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
6-1 · #55
30
Rice
4-3 · #90
28
Spread
TULN -10
✓ RICE W ATS
Total
55
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
29–20
✓ TULN won
Trend: RICE ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: RICE by 4 ✓ Model: Under 5.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
USC
6-2 · #23
50
3-4 · #57
49
Spread
USC -10
✓ CAL W ATS
Total
67.5
▲ Over 99 · Q4
Projected
39–29
✓ USC won
Model: CAL by 2 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-4 · #107
34
2-5 · #129
24
Spread
ULM -1
✓ ARST W ATS
Total
55.5
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
25–27
✗ ULM lost
Model: ULM by 3 ✗ Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-3 · #87
33
4-3 · #49
20
Spread
USA -11.5
✓ UL W ATS
Total
55
▼ Under 53
Projected
22–33
✗ USA lost
Trend: USA ATS ✗ Model: USA by 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-2 · #74
7
3-4 · #48
32
Spread
BOIS -4.5
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
48.5
▼ Under 39
Projected
23–27
✓ BOIS won
Trend: WYO ATS ✗ Model: WYO by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
4-3 · #96
6
4-3 · #70
34
Spread
MRSH -3.5
✓ CCU W ATS
Total
47
▼ Under 40
Projected
28–26
✗ MRSH lost
Trend: CCU ATS ✓ Model: CCU by 9 ✓ Model: Over 7.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-0 · #13
42
2-5 · #106
33
Spread
WASH -27.5
✓ STAN W ATS
Total
62
▲ Over 75 · Q4
Projected
43–16
✓ WASH won
Trend: WASH ATS ✗ Model: STAN by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
7-0 · #52
30
3-4 · #109
13
Spread
AFA -14.5
✓ AFA W ATS
Total
47
▼ Under 43
Projected
33–18
✓ AFA won
Trend: CSU ATS ✗ Model: AFA by 0 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
5-2 · #15
33
5-2 · #44
27
Spread
TENN -4
✓ TENN W ATS
Total
50.5
▲ Over 60 · Q4
Projected
29–24
✓ TENN won
Model: TENN by 6.5 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
Troy
5-2 · #29
31
5-2 · #73
13
Spread
TROY -6.5
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
53
▼ Under 44
Projected
31–25
✓ TROY won
Model: TXST by 2 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
7-0 · #4
24
5-2 · #42
10
Spread
OSU -14.5
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
47
▼ Under 34
Projected
31–17
✓ OSU won
Trend: OSU ATS ✗ Model: WIS by 3 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-6 · #111
7
6-1 · #16
33
Spread
MISS -24
✓ MISS W ATS
Total
62
▼ Under 40
Projected
18–43
✓ MISS won
Trend: MISS ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: MISS by 5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
4-3 · #72
16
UCLA
5-2 · #26
28
Spread
UCLA -14
✓ COLO W ATS
Total
60
▼ Under 44
Projected
23–37
✓ UCLA won
Trend: UCLA ATS ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-1 · #34
42
3-4 · #53
46
Spread
UNC -12
✓ GT W ATS
Total
65.5
▲ Over 88 · Q4
Projected
38–26
✗ UNC lost
Trend: UNC ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: GT by 3 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
4-3 · #97
27
7-0 · #28
30
Spread
JMU -19.5
✓ ODU W ATS
Total
48
▲ Over 57 · Q3
Projected
15–34
✓ JMU won
Trend: ODU ATS ✓ Model: JMU by 1 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-3 · #46
27
1-6 · #101
38
Spread
WSU -4.5
✓ ASU W ATS
Total
49
▲ Over 65 · Q3
Projected
26–20
✗ WSU lost
Trend: WSU ATS ✗ Model: WSU by 3 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-5 · #76
13
5-2 · #43
45
Spread
OKST -7
✓ OKST W ATS
Total
53
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
23–30
✓ OKST won
Trend: OKST ATS ✓ Model: CIN by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
6-1 · #20
24
4-3 · #18
27
Spread
ORST -3
✓ ARIZ W ATS
Total
57.5
▼ Under 51
Projected
30–28
✗ ORST lost
Trend: ARIZ ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: ARIZ by 2 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
3-4 · #117
24
1-6 · #132
34
Spread
Pick’em
✓ NEV W ATS
Total
50
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
26–26
✗ UNM lost
Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UNLV
6-1 · #68
24
6-1 · #71
31
Spread
FRES -10.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
56
▼ Under 55
Projected
24–34
✓ FRES won
Trend: UNLV ATS ✓ Model: UNLV by 1 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
3-5 · #60
35
2-6 · #123
0
Spread
SJSU -10.5
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
57
▼ Under 35
Projected
34–24
✓ SJSU won
Trend: SJSU ATS ✓ Model: HAW by 1 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total