FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 8: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games5454 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS22-3142% covered
Upsets20outright
Over / Under20-3338% over
Model Favorite35-1965% won
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Tuesday, Oct 17

3
Final · Conf
2-5 · #99
35
6-0 · #32
42
Spread
LIB -16
✓ MTSU W ATS
Total
56.5
▲ Over 77 · Q3
Projected
20–36
✓ LIB won
Trend: LIB ATS ✗ Model: LIB by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-2 · #83
17
5-2 · #69
20
Spread
WKU -7.5
✓ JXST W ATS
Total
60.5
▼ Under 37
Projected
33–27
✗ WKU lost
Trend: JXST ATS ✓ Model: JXST by 6.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
1-5 · #121
3
3-3 · #49
55
Spread
USA -18.5
✓ USA W ATS
Total
51
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
17–35
✓ USA won
Trend: USA ATS ✓ Model: USM by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q2

Wednesday, Oct 18

2
Final · Conf
3-4 · #131
33
0-6 · #114
27
Spread
SHSU -5.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
42
▲ Over 60 · OT
Projected
15–21
✗ SHSU lost
Model: SHSU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 6 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-3 · #84
28
UTEP
2-5 · #115
7
Spread
NMSU -3
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
48.5
▼ Under 35
Projected
26–23
✓ NMSU won
Trend: NMSU ATS ✓ Model: UTEP by 2 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3

Thursday, Oct 19

2
Final · Conf
Rice
3-3 · #90
42
3-3 · #118
10
Spread
TLSA -3
✓ RICE W ATS
Total
56.5
▼ Under 52
Projected
26–30
✗ TLSA lost
Model: TLSA by 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-0 · #28
20
4-2 · #96
9
Spread
JMU -5
✓ JMU W ATS
Total
49
▼ Under 29
Projected
28–23
✓ JMU won
Model: JMU by 0 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3

Friday, Oct 20

1
Final · Conf
SMU
4-2 · #22
55
2-5 · #128
0
Spread
SMU -24
✓ SMU W ATS
Total
53
▲ Over 55 · Q4
Projected
39–16
✓ SMU won
Trend: SMU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: TEM by 5 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3

Saturday, Oct 21

46
Final · Conf
6-0 · #5
12
6-0 · #4
20
Spread
OSU -4
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
46.5
▼ Under 32
Projected
23–27
✓ OSU won
Trend: PSU ATS ✗ Model: PSU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
UCF
3-3 · #31
29
6-0 · #9
31
Spread
OU -17
✓ UCF W ATS
Total
67.5
▼ Under 60
Projected
22–41
✓ OU won
Trend: OU ATS ✗ Model: OU by 8 ✗ Model: Under 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
6-0 · #52
17
Navy
3-3 · #108
6
Spread
AFA -11
Push
Total
34
▼ Under 23
Projected
25–14
✓ AFA won
Trend: AFA ATS Model: AFA by 1 Model: Over 6 ✗
Final · Conf
3-3 · #64
7
2-5 · #59
3
Spread
ARK -7
✓ MSST W ATS
Total
46.5
▼ Under 10
Projected
22–29
✗ ARK lost
Trend: ARK ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: ARK by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-2 · #51
31
2-4 · #89
14
Spread
RUTG -6
✓ RUTG W ATS
Total
39.5
▲ Over 45 · Q4
Projected
24–18
✓ RUTG won
Trend: RUTG ATS ✓ Model: RUTG by 2 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
3-3 · #75
38
3-3 · #53
23
Spread
GT -6
✓ BC W ATS
Total
57
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
26–32
✗ GT lost
Trend: Over ✓ Model: GT by 3 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
2-4 · #93
32
2-4 · #76
29
Spread
CIN -2.5
✓ BAY W ATS
Total
51.5
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
24–28
✗ CIN lost
Model: CIN by 6.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-2 · #50
45
UAB
2-5 · #102
21
Spread
MEM -7.5
✓ MEM W ATS
Total
61.5
▲ Over 66 · Q4
Projected
35–28
✓ MEM won
Trend: UAB ATS ✗ Model: UAB by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
2-5 · #120
17
Ohio
5-2 · #63
20
Spread
OHIO -16.5
✓ WMU W ATS
Total
52
▼ Under 37
Projected
17–33
✓ OHIO won
Trend: WMU ATS ✓ Model: WMU by 1 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-5 · #124
10
1-5 · #110
7
Spread
ECU -6
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
39.5
▼ Under 17
Projected
16–22
✗ ECU lost
Trend: CLT ATS ✓ Model: ECU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-4 · #129
28
4-2 · #92
38
Spread
GASO -16.5
✓ ULM W ATS
Total
60.5
▲ Over 66 · Q4
Projected
20–37
✓ GASO won
Trend: GASO ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: GASO by 2 ✗ Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
1-6 · #130
14
3-4 · #80
41
Spread
BGSU -7
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
37
▲ Over 55 · Q3
Projected
17–25
✓ BGSU won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: BGSU by 4 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
4-2 · #46
24
5-1 · #2
38
Spread
ORE -19.5
✓ WSU W ATS
Total
60.5
▲ Over 62 · Q4
Projected
20–40
✓ ORE won
Trend: ORE ATS ✗ Model: ORE by 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-1 · #15
20
6-1 · #7
34
Spread
ALA -8.5
✓ ALA W ATS
Total
47.5
▲ Over 54 · Q4
Projected
20–28
✓ ALA won
Model: TENN by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
2-4 · #47
12
6-1 · #12
34
Spread
MIZ -7.5
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
57.5
▼ Under 46
Projected
23–31
✓ MIZ won
Trend: SC ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-3 · #103
28
5-1 · #55
35
Spread
TULN -20
✓ UNT W ATS
Total
63.5
▼ Under 63
Projected
22–41
✓ TULN won
Trend: UNT ATS ✓ Model: UNT by 4 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
3-3 · #79
12
Iowa
6-1 · #54
10
Spread
IOWA -3.5
✓ MINN W ATS
Total
30.5
▼ Under 22
Projected
13–18
✗ IOWA lost
Trend: IOWA ATS ✗ Model: IOWA by 4.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
4-2 · #42
25
3-4 · #67
21
Spread
WIS -3
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
41
▲ Over 46 · Q4
Projected
24–20
✓ WIS won
Trend: WIS ATS ✓ Model: WIS by 4.5 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
3-3 · #65
9
3-3 · #62
17
Spread
NEB -10.5
✓ NU W ATS
Total
40
▼ Under 26
Projected
15–25
✓ NEB won
Trend: NEB ATS ✗ Model: NU by 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
3-4 · #95
24
1-5 · #125
21
Spread
CONN -1
✓ USF W ATS
Total
57
▼ Under 45
Projected
27–28
✗ CONN lost
Trend: USF ATS ✓ Model: CONN by 0 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
2-4 · #77
17
3-3 · #81
21
Spread
PITT -3
✓ WAKE W ATS
Total
45
▼ Under 38
Projected
23–21
✗ PITT lost
Model: WAKE by 4 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
4-2 · #43
48
4-2 · #39
34
Spread
WVU -3
✓ OKST W ATS
Total
48
▲ Over 82 · Q4
Projected
21–25
✗ WVU lost
Trend: WVU ATS ✗ Model: WVU by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
4-3 · #122
17
1-6 · #113
24
Spread
CMU -5
✓ BALL W ATS
Total
42
▼ Under 41
Projected
24–20
✗ CMU lost
Trend: BALL ATS ✓ Model: BALL by 3 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-3 · #126
13
3-4 · #94
20
Spread
NIU -11.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
43.5
▼ Under 33
Projected
13–25
✓ NIU won
Model: NIU by 3 ✗ Model: Under 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-5 · #119
24
1-6 · #133
6
Spread
BUFF -6.5
✓ BUFF W ATS
Total
44
▼ Under 30
Projected
28–21
✓ BUFF won
Trend: BUFF ATS ✓ Model: KENT by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
5-1 · #8
31
3-3 · #88
24
Spread
TEX -23.5
✓ HOU W ATS
Total
60.5
▼ Under 55
Projected
40–17
✓ TEX won
Trend: HOU ATS ✓ Model: HOU by 2 ✓ Model: Under 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
6-1 · #58
21
6-1 · #78
17
Spread
TOL -2
✓ TOL W ATS
Total
46.5
▼ Under 38
Projected
25–23
✓ TOL won
Trend: M-OH ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: M-OH by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UTSA
3-3 · #56
36
3-3 · #105
10
Spread
UTSA -2.5
✓ UTSA W ATS
Total
58.5
▼ Under 46
Projected
28–26
✓ UTSA won
Trend: UTSA ATS ✓ Model: FAU by 4 ✗ Model: Under 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
2-5 · #123
21
2-4 · #117
42
Spread
HAW -1.5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
60
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
28–29
✓ UNM won
Trend: UNM ATS ✓ Model: UNM by 10 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-5 · #85
31
6-0 · #34
27
Spread
UNC -24
✓ UVA W ATS
Total
58
Push 58
Projected
16–40
✗ UNC lost
Trend: UNC ATS ✗ Model: UVA by 1 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-1 · #16
28
3-3 · #40
21
Spread
MISS -6.5
✓ MISS W ATS
Total
55.5
▼ Under 49
Projected
32–25
✓ MISS won
Trend: MISS ATS ✓ Model: MISS by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
3-4 · #45
14
BYU
4-2 · #86
27
Spread
TTU -3
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
49
▼ Under 41
Projected
29–25
✗ TTU lost
Trend: Over ✗ Model: TTU by 2 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
TCU
4-3 · #30
3
4-2 · #11
41
Spread
KSU -5.5
✓ KSU W ATS
Total
60
▼ Under 44
Projected
26–31
✓ KSU won
Trend: KSU ATS ✓ Model: TCU by 1 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-3 · #61
21
3-3 · #97
28
Spread
APP -6
✓ ODU W ATS
Total
56
▼ Under 49
Projected
29–24
✗ APP lost
Trend: ODU ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: ODU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
3-3 · #70
27
3-3 · #107
17
Spread
CCU -8.5
✓ CCU W ATS
Total
59
▼ Under 44
Projected
33–24
✓ CCU won
Model: CCU by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
3-3 · #109
23
UNLV
5-1 · #68
25
Spread
UNLV -6.5
✓ CSU W ATS
Total
60
▼ Under 48
Projected
27–34
✓ UNLV won
Trend: UNLV ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: UNLV by 2 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-4 · #100
21
2-5 · #60
42
Spread
SJSU -4
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
65
▼ Under 63
Projected
28–31
✓ SJSU won
Trend: Over ✗ Model: USU by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 6 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
7-0 · #3
49
2-4 · #98
0
Spread
MICH -25.5
✓ MICH W ATS
Total
46.5
▲ Over 49 · Q4
Projected
37–12
✓ MICH won
Model: MSU by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Duke
5-1 · #37
20
6-0 · #14
38
Spread
FSU -14
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
48.5
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
19–32
✓ FSU won
Model: DUKE by 4.5 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
Army
2-4 · #104
0
LSU
5-2 · #10
62
Spread
LSU -33
✓ LSU W ATS
Total
60
▲ Over 62 · Q4
Projected
13–45
✓ LSU won
Trend: Over ✓ Model: ARMY by 6 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Utah
5-1 · #33
34
USC
6-1 · #23
32
Spread
USC -7
✓ UTAH W ATS
Total
51.5
▲ Over 66 · Q4
Projected
23–30
✗ USC lost
Trend: UTAH ATS ✓ Model: USC by 2 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-2 · #19
20
4-2 · #25
28
Spread
CLEM -6
✓ MIA W ATS
Total
45
▲ Over 48 · OT
Projected
28–23
✗ CLEM lost
Model: MIA by 8 ✓ Model: Over 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
5-1 · #91
20
4-2 · #87
17
Spread
UL -3
✓ GAST W ATS
Total
62
▼ Under 37
Projected
29–31
✗ UL lost
Trend: GAST ATS ✓ Model: GAST by 2 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
0-6 · #132
6
3-4 · #112
0
Spread
SDSU -11
✓ NEV W ATS
Total
48.5
▼ Under 6
Projected
19–30
✗ SDSU lost
Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UCLA
4-2 · #26
42
2-4 · #106
7
Spread
UCLA -17
✓ UCLA W ATS
Total
52
▼ Under 49
Projected
35–18
✓ UCLA won
Trend: UCLA ATS ✓ Model: STAN by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
1-5 · #101
7
6-0 · #13
15
Spread
WASH -28
✓ ASU W ATS
Total
59.5
▼ Under 22
Projected
14–43
✓ WASH won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: WASH by 4.5 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total