FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 2: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games4848 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS24-2055% covered
Upsets8outright
Over / Under18-3038% over
Model Favorite39-981% won
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Friday, Sep 8

1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #67
23
1-0 · #24
34
Spread
KU -3.5
✓ KU W ATS
Total
57.5
▼ Under 57
Projected
27–31
✓ KU won
Model: KU by 2 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1

Saturday, Sep 9

47
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #111
20
1-0 · #81
36
Spread
WAKE -9.5
✓ WAKE W ATS
Total
55
▲ Over 56 · Q4
Projected
22–31
✓ WAKE won
Model: VAN by 7 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #113
3
1-0 · #1
45
Spread
UGA -42
Push
Total
52.5
▼ Under 48
Projected
8–45
✓ UGA won
Model: BALL by 24 Model: Over 0.5 ✗
Final · Non-conf
0-0
7
1-0 · #5
63
Spread
PSU -44
✓ PSU W ATS
Total
55
▲ Over 70 · Q3
Projected
8–47
✓ PSU won
Model: DEL by 22.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #6
45
1-0 · #38
24
Spread
ND -7
✓ ND W ATS
Total
49.5
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
28–22
✓ ND won
Model: NCSU by 5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
Utah
1-0 · #33
20
0-1 · #93
13
Spread
UTAH -7
Push
Total
46.5
▼ Under 33
Projected
29–23
✓ UTAH won
Model: BAY by 4.5 Model: Over 5.5 ✗
Final · Non-conf
Troy
1-0 · #29
13
1-0 · #11
42
Spread
KSU -15
✓ KSU W ATS
Total
50
▲ Over 55 · Q4
Projected
20–33
✓ KSU won
Model: TROY by 10 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #62
14
1-0 · #72
36
Spread
COLO -2.5
✓ COLO W ATS
Total
56.5
▼ Under 50
Projected
26–30
✓ COLO won
Trend: COLO ATS ✓ Model: COLO by 6.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #66
24
1-0 · #41
17
Spread
Pick’em
✓ PUR W ATS
Total
49
▼ Under 41
Projected
27–30
✗ VT lost
Model: Over 7.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #28
36
0-1 · #85
35
Spread
JMU -6
✓ UVA W ATS
Total
40
▲ Over 71 · Q3
Projected
31–23
✓ JMU won
Model: JMU by 9.5 ✗ Model: Over 13.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
UNLV
1-0 · #68
7
1-0 · #3
35
Spread
MICH -38
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
57.5
▼ Under 42
Projected
10–44
✓ MICH won
Model: UNLV by 21.5 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #16
37
1-0 · #55
20
Spread
MISS -13
✓ MISS W ATS
Total
61.5
▼ Under 57
Projected
33–23
✓ MISS won
Model: TULN by 17.5 ✗ Model: Under 6 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #17
33
1-0 · #25
48
Spread
TA&M -3
✓ MIA W ATS
Total
49.5
▲ Over 81 · Q3
Projected
26–24
✗ TA&M lost
Model: MIA by 7 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
Iowa
1-0 · #54
20
1-0 · #35
13
Spread
IOWA -3.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
35
▼ Under 33
Projected
25–21
✓ IOWA won
Model: IOWA by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 10 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
UTEP
1-1 · #115
7
0-1 · #65
38
Spread
NU -1
✓ NU W ATS
Total
39.5
▲ Over 45 · Q4
Projected
22–23
✓ NU won
Model: NU by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #120
7
1-0 · #82
48
Spread
SYR -24.5
✓ SYR W ATS
Total
56.5
▼ Under 55
Projected
16–38
✓ SYR won
Model: WMU by 12 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #78
41
1-1 · #127
28
Spread
M-OH -7
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
45
▲ Over 69 · Q3
Projected
28–23
✓ M-OH won
Model: MASS by 9 ✗ Model: Over 6 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #73
13
UTSA
0-1 · #56
20
Spread
UTSA -14
✓ TXST W ATS
Total
66
▼ Under 33
Projected
24–35
✓ UTSA won
Model: TXST by 14.5 ✓ Model: Under 6.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #133
6
1-0 · #59
28
Spread
ARK -38
✓ KENT W ATS
Total
57.5
▼ Under 34
Projected
12–47
✓ ARK won
Model: KENT by 13.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #96
31
0-1 · #110
13
Spread
MRSH -3
✓ MRSH W ATS
Total
43.5
▲ Over 44 · Q4
Projected
27–23
✓ MRSH won
Model: MRSH by 3 ✓ Model: Over 6 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #118
10
1-0 · #13
43
Spread
WASH -33
Push
Total
66
▼ Under 53
Projected
15–44
✓ WASH won
Model: TLSA by 22.5 Model: Under 7 ✓
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #61
34
1-0 · #34
40
Spread
UNC -18
✓ APP W ATS
Total
58
▲ Over 74 · OT
Projected
20–35
✓ UNC won
Model: APP by 14 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
SMU
1-0 · #22
11
1-0 · #9
28
Spread
OU -16
✓ OU W ATS
Total
70
▼ Under 39
Projected
21–37
✓ OU won
Model: SMU by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 12 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
1-1 · #84
17
1-0 · #32
33
Spread
LIB -9
✓ LIB W ATS
Total
54.5
▼ Under 50
Projected
21–31
✓ LIB won
Model: LIB by 5.5 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
UAB
1-0 · #102
35
1-0 · #92
49
Spread
GASO -7
✓ GASO W ATS
Total
63
▲ Over 84 · Q3
Projected
22–28
✓ GASO won
Model: UAB by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 13 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
Ohio
1-1 · #63
17
1-0 · #105
10
Spread
FAU -3.5
✓ OHIO W ATS
Total
61
▼ Under 27
Projected
24–27
✗ FAU lost
Model: OHIO by 2 ✓ Model: Under 9.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-0 · #87
31
0-1 · #97
38
Spread
UL -6.5
✓ ODU W ATS
Total
51
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
28–22
✗ UL lost
Model: ODU by 2 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #103
39
1-1 · #131
46
Spread
UNT -11
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
53
▲ Over 85 · Q3
Projected
31–25
✗ UNT lost
Model: FIU by 25 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #76
27
1-0 · #77
21
Spread
PITT -6.5
✓ CIN W ATS
Total
44.5
▲ Over 48 · Q4
Projected
24–31
✗ PITT lost
Model: CIN by 1 ✓ Model: Over 10.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #8
34
1-0 · #7
24
Spread
ALA -7
✓ TEX W ATS
Total
53.5
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
23–31
✗ ALA lost
Model: ALA by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #2
38
0-1 · #45
30
Spread
ORE -4.5
✓ ORE W ATS
Total
70
▼ Under 68
Projected
32–28
✓ ORE won
Model: TTU by 3.5 ✗ Model: Under 10.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #69
16
0-1 · #70
30
Spread
CCU -13.5
✓ CCU W ATS
Total
61
▼ Under 46
Projected
18–30
✓ CCU won
Model: JXST by 8 ✗ Model: Under 13.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #125
14
1-0 · #91
35
Spread
GAST -3
✓ GAST W ATS
Total
54.5
▼ Under 49
Projected
25–29
✓ GAST won
Model: GAST by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #99
19
1-0 · #12
23
Spread
MIZ -21
✓ MTSU W ATS
Total
47.5
▼ Under 42
Projected
16–36
✓ MIZ won
Model: MTSU by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
UCF
1-0 · #31
18
0-1 · #48
16
Spread
UCF -3
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
58.5
▼ Under 34
Projected
36–29
✓ UCF won
Model: UCF by 20 ✗ Model: Over 5.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #88
41
Rice
0-1 · #90
43
Spread
HOU -7.5
✓ RICE W ATS
Total
51
▲ Over 84 · Q4
Projected
29–22
✗ HOU lost
Model: RICE by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #50
37
0-1 · #107
3
Spread
MEM -21
✓ MEM W ATS
Total
57.5
▼ Under 40
Projected
41–19
✓ MEM won
Model: MEM by 6 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #42
22
1-0 · #46
31
Spread
WIS -5
✓ WSU W ATS
Total
58
▼ Under 53
Projected
29–26
✗ WIS lost
Model: WSU by 8.5 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #124
20
1-0 · #27
38
Spread
MD -24.5
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
50
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
14–35
✓ MD won
Model: CLT by 18 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #126
6
1-0 · #79
25
Spread
MINN -19.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
48
▼ Under 31
Projected
14–31
✓ MINN won
Model: EMU by 13 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #18
24
1-0 · #64
31
Spread
MSST -9
✓ ARIZ W ATS
Total
60
▼ Under 55
Projected
23–31
✓ MSST won
Model: ARIZ by 4 ✓ Model: Under 6 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #128
7
1-0 · #51
36
Spread
RUTG -7.5
✓ RUTG W ATS
Total
43.5
▼ Under 43
Projected
19–26
✓ RUTG won
Model: TEM by 4.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
UCLA
1-0 · #26
35
2-0 · #112
10
Spread
UCLA -13
✓ UCLA W ATS
Total
49
▼ Under 45
Projected
28–18
✓ UCLA won
Model: SDSU by 13.5 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Neutral
1-0 · #52
13
0-1 · #114
3
Spread
AFA -13.5
✓ SHSU W ATS
Total
36.5
▼ Under 16
Projected
26–14
✓ AFA won
Model: SHSU by 4 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #121
13
1-0 · #14
66
Spread
FSU -31
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
54
▲ Over 79 · Q3
Projected
16–43
✓ FSU won
Model: USM by 20.5 ✗ Model: Over 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
1-0 · #106
10
USC
2-0 · #23
56
Spread
USC -28.5
✓ USC W ATS
Total
70.5
▼ Under 66
Projected
18–43
✓ USC won
Model: STAN by 19 ✗ Model: Under 9.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #40
14
1-0 · #57
10
Spread
AUB -5
✓ CAL W ATS
Total
55.5
▼ Under 24
Projected
32–30
✓ AUB won
Model: CAL by 13.5 ✓ Model: Over 6 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #43
27
1-0 · #101
15
Spread
OKST -2.5
✓ OKST W ATS
Total
53.5
▼ Under 42
Projected
27–26
✓ OKST won
Model: ASU by 8.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total