FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 3: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games5555 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS27-2849% covered
Upsets14outright
Over / Under25-3045% over
Model Favorite42-1376% won
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Thursday, Sep 14

1
Final · Conf
Navy
1-1 · #108
24
2-0 · #50
28
Spread
MEM -12.5
✓ NAVY W ATS
Total
47
▲ Over 52 · Q4
Projected
19–32
✓ MEM won
Model: MEM by 5 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1

Friday, Sep 15

3
Final · Non-conf
0-2 · #85
14
2-0 · #27
42
Spread
MD -16.5
✓ MD W ATS
Total
48.5
▲ Over 56 · Q4
Projected
19–36
✓ MD won
Model: MD by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 6 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
Army
1-1 · #104
37
UTSA
1-1 · #56
29
Spread
UTSA -7
✓ ARMY W ATS
Total
42
▲ Over 66 · Q3
Projected
21–27
✗ UTSA lost
Model: ARMY by 6 ✓ Model: Over 6 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-1 · #100
21
2-0 · #52
39
Spread
AFA -9
✓ AFA W ATS
Total
45.5
▲ Over 60 · Q3
Projected
19–30
✓ AFA won
Model: AFA by 11 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1

Saturday, Sep 16

51
Final · Conf
2-0 · #14
31
1-1 · #75
29
Spread
FSU -25.5
✓ BC W ATS
Total
48
▲ Over 60 · Q4
Projected
38–13
✓ FSU won
Model: BC by 4.5 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-0 · #5
30
1-1 · #67
13
Spread
PSU -14
✓ PSU W ATS
Total
47.5
▼ Under 43
Projected
34–22
✓ PSU won
Model: ILL by 7 ✗ Model: Over 8.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
LSU
1-1 · #10
41
2-0 · #64
14
Spread
LSU -9.5
✓ LSU W ATS
Total
54
▲ Over 55 · Q4
Projected
33–26
✓ LSU won
Model: MSST by 9 ✗ Model: Over 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #11
27
2-0 · #12
30
Spread
KSU -3.5
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
48
▲ Over 57 · Q4
Projected
26–23
✗ KSU lost
Model: MIZ by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #32
55
0-2 · #119
27
Spread
LIB -2.5
✓ LIB W ATS
Total
54
▲ Over 82 · Q3
Projected
29–25
✓ LIB won
Model: LIB by 7 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Neutral
2-0 · #21
21
1-1 · #89
14
Spread
LOU -10
✓ IU W ATS
Total
51
▼ Under 35
Projected
32–21
✓ LOU won
Model: LOU by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #92
14
1-1 · #42
35
Spread
WIS -20.5
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
65.5
▼ Under 49
Projected
20–38
✓ WIS won
Model: GASO by 12 ✗ Model: Under 7 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #81
27
1-1 · #97
24
Spread
WAKE -13.5
✓ ODU W ATS
Total
60
▼ Under 51
Projected
33–20
✓ WAKE won
Model: ODU by 2 ✓ Model: Under 7 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #35
7
Ohio
2-1 · #63
10
Spread
ISU -1.5
✓ OHIO W ATS
Total
42
▼ Under 17
Projected
21–22
✓ OHIO won
Model: OHIO by 10.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-2 · #127
17
1-1 · #126
19
Spread
EMU -9
✓ MASS W ATS
Total
50
▼ Under 36
Projected
22–31
✓ EMU won
Model: MASS by 2 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #122
17
3-0 · #6
41
Spread
ND -35
✓ CMU W ATS
Total
51
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
10–43
✓ ND won
Trend: ND ATS ✗ Model: CMU by 6.5 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-1 · #47
14
2-0 · #1
24
Spread
UGA -26
✓ SC W ATS
Total
54
▼ Under 38
Projected
15–40
✓ UGA won
Model: SC by 5.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #7
17
1-1 · #95
3
Spread
ALA -34.5
✓ USF W ATS
Total
61
▼ Under 20
Projected
43–14
✓ ALA won
Model: USF by 27 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
2-1 · #112
9
2-0 · #20
26
Spread
ORST -24.5
✓ SDSU W ATS
Total
48.5
▼ Under 35
Projected
14–36
✓ ORST won
Model: SDSU by 8 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #9
66
1-1 · #118
17
Spread
OU -28
✓ OU W ATS
Total
59.5
▲ Over 83 · Q3
Projected
42–17
✓ OU won
Model: TLSA by 12.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #79
13
2-0 · #34
31
Spread
UNC -7
✓ UNC W ATS
Total
52
▼ Under 44
Projected
23–29
✓ UNC won
Model: MINN by 5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #65
14
Duke
2-0 · #37
38
Spread
DUKE -17
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
48
▲ Over 52 · Q4
Projected
14–30
✓ DUKE won
Model: NU by 4.5 ✗ Model: Under 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #120
10
Iowa
2-0 · #54
41
Spread
IOWA -28.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
43.5
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
9–35
✓ IOWA won
Model: WMU by 12.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #41
16
2-0 · #51
35
Spread
RUTG -6.5
✓ RUTG W ATS
Total
37.5
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
17–24
✓ RUTG won
Model: RUTG by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
2-1 · #131
24
0-2 · #125
17
Spread
CONN -7
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
43.5
▼ Under 41
Projected
19–26
✗ CONN lost
Model: FIU by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-2 · #110
28
1-1 · #61
43
Spread
APP -7.5
✓ APP W ATS
Total
48.5
▲ Over 71 · Q3
Projected
23–30
✓ APP won
Model: APP by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #83
10
2-0 · #4
63
Spread
OSU -29.5
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
65
▲ Over 73 · Q4
Projected
16–43
✓ OSU won
Model: WKU by 13.5 ✗ Model: Under 6 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #129
3
1-1 · #17
47
Spread
TA&M -36.5
✓ TA&M W ATS
Total
53.5
▼ Under 50
Projected
9–41
✓ TA&M won
Model: ULM by 22.5 ✗ Model: Under 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #55
21
1-1 · #121
3
Spread
TULN -8
✓ TULN W ATS
Total
47.5
▼ Under 24
Projected
29–21
✓ TULN won
Model: USM by 1 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #13
41
2-0 · #98
7
Spread
WASH -15
✓ WASH W ATS
Total
57
▼ Under 48
Projected
34–21
✓ WASH won
Model: MSU by 7 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #91
41
1-1 · #124
25
Spread
GAST -5
✓ GAST W ATS
Total
52
▲ Over 66 · Q3
Projected
28–23
✓ GAST won
Model: CLT by 1 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-0 · #15
16
1-1 · #36
29
Spread
TENN -5
✓ FLA W ATS
Total
56.5
▼ Under 45
Projected
31–26
✗ TENN lost
Model: TENN by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-2 · #103
40
2-1 · #116
37
Spread
LT -4.5
✓ UNT W ATS
Total
66.5
▲ Over 77 · Q4
Projected
28–33
✗ LT lost
Model: UNT by 0 ✓ Model: Under 5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #94
11
0-2 · #62
35
Spread
NEB -11.5
✓ NEB W ATS
Total
42.5
▲ Over 46 · Q4
Projected
17–28
✓ NEB won
Model: NIU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
2-1 · #111
37
UNLV
1-1 · #68
40
Spread
VAN -4.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
56.5
▲ Over 77 · Q4
Projected
31–26
✗ VAN lost
Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #78
31
2-0 · #76
24
Spread
CIN -14.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
44.5
▲ Over 55 · Q4
Projected
19–33
✗ CIN lost
Model: M-OH by 4 ✓ Model: Over 7 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #49
33
2-0 · #43
7
Spread
OKST -7
✓ USA W ATS
Total
49.5
▼ Under 40
Projected
23–31
✗ OKST lost
Model: OKST by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #87
41
UAB
1-1 · #102
21
Spread
UAB -2
✓ UL W ATS
Total
60
▲ Over 62 · Q4
Projected
27–29
✗ UAB lost
Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-0 · #28
16
Troy
1-1 · #29
14
Spread
TROY -2.5
✓ JMU W ATS
Total
46.5
▼ Under 30
Projected
25–25
✗ TROY lost
Model: JMU by 8.5 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-2 · #60
17
1-1 · #58
21
Spread
TOL -9
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
56.5
▼ Under 38
Projected
25–35
✓ TOL won
Model: TOL by 7.5 ✗ Model: Over 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #80
6
2-0 · #3
31
Spread
MICH -40.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
53.5
▼ Under 37
Projected
7–43
✓ MICH won
Model: BGSU by 18.5 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #53
23
2-0 · #16
48
Spread
MISS -17
✓ MISS W ATS
Total
61.5
▲ Over 71 · Q4
Projected
24–39
✓ MISS won
Model: GT by 7 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
BYU
2-0 · #86
38
2-0 · #59
31
Spread
ARK -9
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
48
▲ Over 69 · Q3
Projected
19–29
✗ ARK lost
Model: ARK by 5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #130
3
2-0 · #44
35
Spread
UK -25
✓ UK W ATS
Total
48.5
▼ Under 38
Projected
13–35
✓ UK won
Model: AKR by 17 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #82
35
1-1 · #66
20
Spread
SYR -1
✓ SYR W ATS
Total
56.5
▼ Under 55
Projected
28–26
✓ SYR won
Model: SYR by 8 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #77
6
1-1 · #39
17
Spread
WVU -2.5
✓ WVU W ATS
Total
48
▼ Under 23
Projected
24–26
✓ WVU won
Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #74
10
2-0 · #8
31
Spread
TEX -30
✓ WYO W ATS
Total
48.5
▼ Under 41
Projected
11–39
✓ TEX won
Model: WYO by 11 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-2 · #123
10
2-0 · #2
55
Spread
ORE -37.5
✓ ORE W ATS
Total
67.5
▼ Under 65
Projected
13–49
✓ ORE won
Model: HAW by 8.5 ✗ Model: Under 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
1-2 · #84
27
1-1 · #117
17
Spread
UNM -2.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
52
▼ Under 44
Projected
27–28
✗ UNM lost
Model: NMSU by 4 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
30
1-1 · #106
23
Spread
STAN -7
✓ SAC W ATS
Total
60.5
▼ Under 53
Projected
25–32
✗ STAN lost
Model: STAN by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #105
14
1-1 · #19
48
Spread
CLEM -24.5
✓ CLEM W ATS
Total
51.5
▲ Over 62 · Q4
Projected
16–37
✓ CLEM won
Model: FAU by 14 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
TCU
1-1 · #30
36
1-1 · #88
13
Spread
TCU -7.5
✓ TCU W ATS
Total
64
▼ Under 49
Projected
34–26
✓ TCU won
Model: HOU by 2 ✗ Model: Under 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #109
35
2-0 · #72
43
Spread
COLO -23
✓ CSU W ATS
Total
63
▲ Over 78 · OT
Projected
20–41
✓ COLO won
Model: CSU by 8.5 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #71
29
1-1 · #101
0
Spread
FRES -4
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
48
▼ Under 29
Projected
30–27
✓ FRES won
Model: ASU by 1 ✗ Model: Over 9 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #24
31
0-2 · #132
24
Spread
KU -28.5
✓ NEV W ATS
Total
58
▼ Under 55
Projected
42–16
✓ KU won
Trend: NEV ATS ✓ Model: NEV by 16.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
UTEP
1-2 · #115
10
1-1 · #18
31
Spread
ARIZ -18
✓ ARIZ W ATS
Total
57
▼ Under 41
Projected
18–35
✓ ARIZ won
Model: UTEP by 7 ✗ Model: Under 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total