FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 7: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games5555 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS29-2653% covered
Upsets17outright
Over / Under31-2456% over
Model Favorite38-1769% won
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Tuesday, Oct 10

3
Final · Conf
3-4 · #116
23
1-5 · #99
31
Spread
MTSU -3
✓ MTSU W ATS
Total
53.5
▲ Over 54 · Q4
Projected
25–28
✓ MTSU won
Trend: LT ATS ✗ Model: LT by 1 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-0 · #32
31
5-1 · #69
13
Spread
LIB -7
✓ LIB W ATS
Total
59.5
▼ Under 44
Projected
32–25
✓ LIB won
Trend: JXST ATS ✗ Model: JXST by 2 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
2-3 · #70
27
3-2 · #61
24
Spread
APP -4.5
✓ CCU W ATS
Total
59
▼ Under 51
Projected
27–32
✗ APP lost
Model: CCU by 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1

Wednesday, Oct 11

2
Final · Conf
UTEP
1-5 · #115
27
3-3 · #131
14
Spread
FIU -3.5
✓ UTEP W ATS
Total
42.5
▼ Under 41
Projected
21–24
✗ FIU lost
Trend: FIU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: UTEP by 1 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
0-5 · #114
13
3-3 · #84
27
Spread
NMSU -3.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
42.5
▼ Under 40
Projected
17–21
✓ NMSU won
Model: NMSU by 3 ✓ Model: Under 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q1

Thursday, Oct 12

2
Final · Conf
4-1 · #39
39
2-3 · #88
41
Spread
WVU -3
✓ HOU W ATS
Total
49
▲ Over 80 · Q4
Projected
25–23
✗ WVU lost
Trend: WVU ATS ✗ Model: HOU by 2 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
SMU
3-2 · #22
31
1-4 · #110
10
Spread
SMU -11.5
✓ SMU W ATS
Total
49
▼ Under 41
Projected
30–19
✓ SMU won
Trend: SMU ATS ✓ Model: ECU by 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4

Friday, Oct 13

3
Final · Conf
4-1 · #55
31
4-1 · #50
21
Spread
TULN -4.5
✓ TULN W ATS
Total
54.5
▼ Under 52
Projected
27–24
✓ TULN won
Trend: TULN ATS ✓ Model: MEM by 6.5 ✗ Model: Under 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
5-1 · #71
37
3-3 · #100
32
Spread
FRES -5.5
✓ USU W ATS
Total
55.5
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
32–27
✓ FRES won
Trend: USU ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: USU by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
1-4 · #106
46
4-2 · #72
43
Spread
COLO -13.5
✓ STAN W ATS
Total
57.5
▲ Over 89 · Q4
Projected
24–38
✗ COLO lost
Trend: COLO ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: COLO by 5.5 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3

Saturday, Oct 14

45
Final · Conf
6-0 · #1
37
2-5 · #111
20
Spread
UGA -33.5
✓ VAN W ATS
Total
55.5
▲ Over 57 · Q4
Projected
43–10
✓ UGA won
Trend: UGA ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: VAN by 5.5 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-3 · #89
7
6-0 · #3
52
Spread
MICH -32.5
✓ MICH W ATS
Total
45.5
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
7–39
✓ MICH won
Trend: IU ATS ✗ Model: IU by 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
5-0 · #4
41
2-4 · #66
7
Spread
OSU -17.5
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
52.5
▼ Under 48
Projected
35–18
✓ OSU won
Trend: OSU ATS ✓ Model: OSU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
4-2 · #82
3
5-0 · #14
41
Spread
FSU -19.5
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
53.5
▼ Under 44
Projected
19–37
✓ FSU won
Model: SYR by 5.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
2-4 · #59
21
5-1 · #7
24
Spread
ALA -19.5
✓ ARK W ATS
Total
44.5
▲ Over 45 · Q4
Projected
13–32
✓ ALA won
Model: ARK by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-3 · #98
24
4-2 · #51
27
Spread
RUTG -3.5
✓ MSU W ATS
Total
38.5
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
18–23
✓ RUTG won
Trend: RUTG ATS ✗ Model: RUTG by 5 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-3 · #35
30
2-3 · #76
10
Spread
CIN -3.5
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
41.5
▼ Under 40
Projected
19–24
✗ CIN lost
Model: CIN by 4 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
2-4 · #128
14
2-3 · #103
45
Spread
UNT -6.5
✓ UNT W ATS
Total
65.5
▼ Under 59
Projected
30–36
✓ UNT won
Trend: UNT ATS ✓ Model: TEM by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-1 · #92
13
5-0 · #28
41
Spread
JMU -5.5
✓ JMU W ATS
Total
59.5
▼ Under 54
Projected
26–31
✓ JMU won
Trend: GASO ATS ✗ Model: GASO by 2 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-5 · #133
14
3-3 · #126
28
Spread
EMU -7.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
39.5
▲ Over 42 · Q4
Projected
17–25
✓ EMU won
Model: EMU by 1 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Navy
2-3 · #108
14
1-4 · #124
0
Spread
NAVY -3.5
✓ NAVY W ATS
Total
43.5
▼ Under 14
Projected
23–20
✓ NAVY won
Trend: CLT ATS ✗ Model: CLT by 3 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
5-1 · #58
13
1-5 · #113
6
Spread
TOL -17.5
✓ BALL W ATS
Total
48.5
▼ Under 19
Projected
33–16
✓ TOL won
Trend: TOL ATS ✗ Model: BALL by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-3 · #57
14
Utah
4-1 · #33
34
Spread
UTAH -9.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
Total
43.5
▲ Over 48 · Q4
Projected
17–26
✓ UTAH won
Trend: UTAH ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: CAL by 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
1-6 · #127
0
5-0 · #5
63
Spread
PSU -41.5
✓ PSU W ATS
Total
54.5
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
7–48
✓ PSU won
Trend: PSU ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: MASS by 2 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
5-0 · #2
33
5-0 · #13
36
Spread
WASH -3.5
✓ ORE W ATS
Total
68.5
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
32–35
✓ WASH won
Trend: WASH ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: ORE by 2 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
4-2 · #17
13
4-1 · #15
20
Spread
TENN -3.5
✓ TENN W ATS
Total
54.5
▼ Under 33
Projected
25–28
✓ TENN won
Model: TA&M by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
5-1 · #24
32
3-2 · #43
39
Spread
KU -2.5
✓ OKST W ATS
Total
52.5
▲ Over 71 · Q3
Projected
29–26
✗ KU lost
Model: KU by 3 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
Troy
4-2 · #29
19
Army
2-3 · #104
0
Spread
TROY -6.5
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
41.5
▼ Under 19
Projected
24–18
✓ TROY won
Trend: ARMY ATS ✗ Model: ARMY by 4 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
2-4 · #67
27
5-1 · #27
24
Spread
MD -13.5
✓ ILL W ATS
Total
50.5
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
20–33
✗ MD lost
Trend: MD ATS ✗ Model: MD by 1 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-2 · #36
41
2-3 · #47
39
Spread
SC -1.5
✓ FLA W ATS
Total
49.5
▲ Over 80 · Q3
Projected
24–24
✗ SC lost
Model: FLA by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
3-2 · #81
13
2-4 · #41
30
Spread
VT -1.5
✓ VT W ATS
Total
48.5
▼ Under 43
Projected
22–24
✓ VT won
Model: WAKE by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
BYU
4-1 · #86
11
TCU
3-3 · #30
44
Spread
TCU -5.5
✓ TCU W ATS
Total
52.5
▲ Over 55 · Q4
Projected
22–29
✓ TCU won
Trend: BYU ATS ✗ Model: TCU by 5.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-3 · #105
56
3-3 · #95
14
Spread
USF -2.5
✓ FAU W ATS
Total
60.5
▲ Over 70 · Q4
Projected
27–30
✗ USF lost
Trend: USF ATS ✗ Model: USF by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-5 · #130
10
3-3 · #122
17
Spread
CMU -10.5
✓ AKR W ATS
Total
43.5
▼ Under 27
Projected
18–28
✓ CMU won
Trend: AKR ATS ✓ Model: AKR by 6.5 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
2-4 · #80
24
2-4 · #119
14
Spread
BUFF -2.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
44.5
▼ Under 38
Projected
23–25
✗ BUFF lost
Trend: BGSU ATS ✓ Model: Over 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-1 · #78
34
2-4 · #120
21
Spread
M-OH -7.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
45.5
▲ Over 55 · Q4
Projected
29–22
✓ M-OH won
Trend: M-OH ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: M-OH by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Iowa
5-1 · #54
15
4-1 · #42
6
Spread
WIS -8.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
34.5
▼ Under 21
Projected
14–23
✗ WIS lost
Model: WIS by 3 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Ohio
5-1 · #63
13
2-4 · #94
23
Spread
OHIO -5.5
✓ NIU W ATS
Total
45.5
▼ Under 36
Projected
24–19
✗ OHIO lost
Model: NIU by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
UNLV
4-1 · #68
45
0-5 · #132
27
Spread
UNLV -7.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
51.5
▲ Over 72 · Q3
Projected
32–24
✓ UNLV won
Trend: UNLV ATS ✓ Model: UNLV by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
1-5 · #60
52
2-3 · #117
24
Spread
SJSU -6.5
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
53.5
▲ Over 76 · Q3
Projected
30–25
✓ SJSU won
Trend: UNM ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: UNM by 6.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
6-0 · #21
21
1-4 · #77
38
Spread
LOU -7.5
✓ PITT W ATS
Total
46.5
▲ Over 59 · Q3
Projected
28–20
✗ LOU lost
Trend: LOU ATS ✗ Model: LOU by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-3 · #18
44
4-1 · #46
6
Spread
WSU -7.5
✓ ARIZ W ATS
Total
56.5
▼ Under 50
Projected
26–33
✗ WSU lost
Trend: ARIZ ATS ✓ Model: ARIZ by 0 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-2 · #40
18
LSU
4-2 · #10
48
Spread
LSU -10.5
✓ LSU W ATS
Total
58.5
▲ Over 66 · Q4
Projected
25–35
✓ LSU won
Model: AUB by 1 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-2 · #11
38
3-3 · #45
21
Spread
TTU -0.5
✓ KSU W ATS
Total
56.5
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
29–30
✗ TTU lost
Model: TTU by 2 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-1 · #96
24
4-1 · #91
41
Spread
GAST -1.5
✓ GAST W ATS
Total
53.5
▲ Over 65 · Q4
Projected
26–27
✓ GAST won
Model: MRSH by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-3 · #129
20
4-2 · #73
21
Spread
TXST -19.5
✓ ULM W ATS
Total
64.5
▼ Under 41
Projected
21–40
✓ TXST won
Model: ULM by 3 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-1 · #74
27
5-0 · #52
34
Spread
AFA -12.5
✓ WYO W ATS
Total
41.5
▲ Over 61 · Q3
Projected
15–28
✓ AFA won
Trend: WYO ATS ✓ Model: AFA by 1 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
USC
6-0 · #23
20
5-2 · #6
48
Spread
ND -3.5
✓ ND W ATS
Total
60.5
▲ Over 68 · Q4
Projected
31–34
✓ ND won
Model: ND by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-1 · #25
31
5-0 · #34
41
Spread
UNC -2.5
✓ UNC W ATS
Total
55.5
▲ Over 72 · Q4
Projected
27–29
✓ UNC won
Trend: UNC ATS ✓ Model: MIA by 3 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
5-1 · #12
38
5-1 · #44
21
Spread
UK -2.5
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
50.5
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
24–26
✗ UK lost
Trend: UK ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: MIZ by 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
UCLA
4-1 · #26
24
5-1 · #20
36
Spread
ORST -3.5
✓ ORST W ATS
Total
53.5
▲ Over 60 · Q4
Projected
25–29
✓ ORST won
Model: ORST by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-2 · #38
3
Duke
4-1 · #37
24
Spread
DUKE -3.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
42.5
▼ Under 27
Projected
22–27
✓ DUKE won
Model: DUKE by 10 ✓ Model: Over 7 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UAB
2-4 · #102
20
UTSA
2-3 · #56
41
Spread
UTSA -7.5
✓ UTSA W ATS
Total
66.5
▼ Under 61
Projected
27–34
✓ UTSA won
Trend: UAB ATS ✗ Model: UAB by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-3 · #48
30
2-3 · #109
31
Spread
BOIS -7.5
✓ CSU W ATS
Total
59.5
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
33–27
✗ BOIS lost
Trend: Over ✓ Model: CSU by 5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
2-4 · #112
41
2-4 · #123
34
Spread
SDSU -6.5
✓ SDSU W ATS
Total
53.5
▲ Over 75 · Q4
Projected
28–23
✓ SDSU won
Trend: SDSU ATS ✓ Model: HAW by 6 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total