FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 7: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games5959 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS27-3047% covered
Upsets18outright
Over / Under31-2853% over
Model Favorite41-1869% won
Did the team the spread moved toward cover? ATS vs the closing line, by how far it moved
Moved towardThis week20262024–2026
Any move
29–22–157%
178–153–654%
789–801–850%
1.5+ pts
16–11–159%
111–93–354%
446–443–450%
3+ pts
9–853%
61–49–155%
215–206–251%
5+ pts
3–350%
18–1358%
47–4551%
7+ pts
1–0100%
3–175%
13–765%
Covered–didn’t–push; % leaves out pushes and is grey under 10 games; green or red from 10 games. ClickTap a row or count to filter.
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Tuesday, Oct 13

2
Final · Conf
2-3 · #113
30
2-3 · #126
33
Spread
DEL -1.5
✓ MTSU W ATS
Total
49.5 ▲1
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
27–26
✗ DEL lost
Trend: Under ✗ Model: DEL by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
3-2 · #105
24
4-2 · #99
27
Spread
JXST -3
Push
Total
44.5 ▼1
▲ Over 51 · Q3
Projected
21–24
✓ JXST won
Trend: JXST ATS Model: FIU by 0

Wednesday, Oct 14

2
Final · Conf
1-4 · #117
21
1-4 · #130
24
Spread
KENN -2.5
✓ MOST W ATS
Total
52.5 ▲2
▼ Under 45
Projected
28–26
✗ KENN lost
Trend: KENN ATS ✗ Model: KENN by 0 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-4 · #115
16
1-4 · #124
3
Spread
WKU -1.5
✓ WKU W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲2
▼ Under 19
Projected
27–26
✓ WKU won
Trend: SHSU ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: SHSU by 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1

Thursday, Oct 15

3
Final · Conf
3-2 · #92
17
UAB
3-3 · #107
30
Spread
ECU -5.5
✓ UAB W ATS
Total
49.5 ▼4
▼ Under 47
Projected
28–22
✗ ECU lost
Trend: Under ✓ Model: ECU by 1 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
2-4 · #82
23
2-4 · #112
15
Spread
GASO -3
✓ GASO W ATS
Total
44.5 ▼5
▼ Under 38
Projected
25–22
✓ GASO won
Trend: GASO ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: ODU by 1 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
2-3 · #110
27
2-3 · #58
66
Spread
TXST -15.5
✓ TXST W ATS
Total
69.5 ▲2
▲ Over 93 · Q3
Projected
27–42
✓ TXST won
Trend: Over ✓Trend: TXST ATS ✓ Model: CSU by 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1

Friday, Oct 16

3
Final · Conf
5-1 · #62
17
2-3 · #86
31
Spread
MEM -6.5
✓ TULN W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲2
▼ Under 48
Projected
28–21
✗ MEM lost
Trend: MEM ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: TULN by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 6.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-3 · #42
38
3-3 · #59
26
Spread
PUR -3
✓ WASH W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼1
▲ Over 64 · Q4
Projected
26–28
✗ PUR lost
Trend: PUR ATS ✗ Model: WASH by 2 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-2 · #94
35
2-4 · #116
32
Spread
APP -1.5
✓ APP W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼3
▲ Over 67 · Q3
Projected
27–25
✓ APP won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: APP by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q3

Saturday, Oct 17

49
Final · Conf
5-1 · #2
19
6-0 · #7
15
Spread
OSU -3
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
49.5 ▲1
▼ Under 34
Projected
28–25
✓ OSU won
Trend: OSU ATS ✓ Model: IU by 1 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
4-2 · #17
27
4-1 · #8
24
Spread
TEX -13.5
✓ FLA W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼2
▼ Under 51
Projected
20–34
✗ TEX lost
Trend: FLA ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: FLA by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-1 · #29
0
LSU
4-2 · #6
31
Spread
LSU -17.5
✓ LSU W ATS
Total
56.5 ▼3
▼ Under 31
Projected
20–37
✓ LSU won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: MSST by 6 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
4-2 · #49
13
SMU
4-1 · #35
23
Spread
SMU -10
Push
Total
51.5 ▼2
▼ Under 36
Projected
21–31
✓ SMU won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: UVA by 3.5 Model: Over 0.5 ✗
Final · Conf
4-1 · #30
24
2-4 · #69
21
Spread
NU -7.5
✓ MSU W ATS
Total
50.5 ▲3
▼ Under 45
Projected
28–21
✓ NU won
Trend: NU ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: MSU by 2 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-1 · #64
42
3-3 · #73
45
Spread
WVU -1.5
✓ WVU W ATS
Total
64.5 ▲3
▲ Over 87 · Q4
Projected
29–30
✓ WVU won
Trend: Over ✓Trend: CIN ATS ✗ Model: CIN by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
2-3 · #46
24
3-2 · #41
35
Spread
KSU -3
✓ KSU W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲1
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
26–29
✓ KSU won
Model: KU by 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
5-1 · #39
21
2-3 · #79
27
Spread
PITT -6.5
✓ BC W ATS
Total
42.5 ▼4
▲ Over 48 · Q4
Projected
25–17
✗ PITT lost
Trend: Under ✗ Model: PITT by 6 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-1 · #102
24
Army
3-2 · #78
56
Spread
ARMY -2.5
✓ ARMY W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼4
▲ Over 80 · Q3
Projected
27–30
✓ ARMY won
Trend: FAU ATS ✗ Model: ARMY by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
1-5 · #132
32
2-4 · #129
31
Spread
BGSU -6
✓ BALL W ATS
Total
46.5 ▲2
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
21–28
✗ BGSU lost
Trend: Over ✓ Model: BGSU by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-1 · #91
22
6-0 · #51
49
Spread
JMU -7.5
✓ JMU W ATS
Total
57.5 ▲3
▲ Over 71 · Q3
Projected
23–31
✓ JMU won
Trend: JMU ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: JMU by 4.5 ✓ Model: Under 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
1-4 · #77
37
2-4 · #72
30
Spread
MD -5.5
✓ RUTG W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼3
▲ Over 67 · Q4
Projected
24–30
✗ MD lost
Model: MD by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
0-6 · #135
38
2-4 · #104
31
Spread
TEM -17.5
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
47.5 ▼2
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
15–33
✗ TEM lost
Trend: Under ✗ Model: TEM by 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-2 · #123
18
3-3 · #125
25
Spread
BUFF -6.5
✓ BUFF W ATS
Total
43.5 ▼4
▼ Under 43
Projected
21–26
✓ BUFF won
Trend: BUFF ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: MASS by 6 ✗ Model: Over 4 ✗ Cover settled: OT
Final · Conf
4-2 · #88
21
3-3 · #120
14
Spread
WMU -7.5
✓ CMU W ATS
Total
42.5
▼ Under 35
Projected
25–17
✓ WMU won
Trend: WMU ATS ✗ Model: WMU by 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
3-2 · #25
27
6-0 · #4
24
Spread
UGA -19.5
✓ AUB W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼5
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
14–34
✗ UGA lost
Trend: UGA ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: UGA by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-1 · #5
10
5-1 · #11
26
Spread
ALA -7.5
✓ TENN W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼6
▼ Under 36
Projected
30–23
✗ ALA lost
Trend: ALA ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: ALA by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-1 · #19
3
4-1 · #12
31
Spread
MISS -4
✓ MISS W ATS
Total
57.5
▼ Under 34
Projected
24–28
✓ MISS won
Trend: MIZ ATS ✗ Model: MIZ by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
3-2 · #66
25
5-0 · #15
53
Spread
TTU -16.5
✓ TTU W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼2
▲ Over 78 · Q2
Projected
17–34
✓ TTU won
Trend: TTU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: TTU by 2 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
2-3 · #68
24
4-2 · #45
34
Spread
VT -8.5
✓ VT W ATS
Total
55.5
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
22–31
✓ VT won
Model: VT by 2.5 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-2 · #47
24
Duke
4-1 · #43
20
Spread
DUKE -3
✓ UNC W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼8
▼ Under 44
Projected
20–24
✗ DUKE lost
Trend: DUKE ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: DUKE by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-3 · #32
18
3-2 · #34
21
Spread
MICH -6
✓ PSU W ATS
Total
43.5 ▼8
▼ Under 39
Projected
20–25
✓ MICH won
Trend: PSU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: PSU by 4.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
0-5 · #134
23
3-3 · #122
41
Spread
WYO -7
✓ WYO W ATS
Total
42.5 ▲4
▲ Over 64 · Q3
Projected
16–24
✓ WYO won
Trend: WYO ATS ✓ Model: WYO by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
UNLV
4-2 · #84
31
4-1 · #90
41
Spread
AFA -1.5
✓ AFA W ATS
Total
49.5 ▲1
▲ Over 72 · Q4
Projected
23–25
✓ AFA won
Trend: AFA ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: UNLV by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
4-2 · #75
34
4-3 · #128
14
Spread
TOL -7.5
✓ TOL W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼1
▼ Under 48
Projected
31–23
✓ TOL won
Model: TOL by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-5 · #133
14
3-3 · #106
34
Spread
M-OH -9.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
47.5 ▲1
▲ Over 48 · Q4
Projected
21–31
✓ M-OH won
Model: M-OH by 3 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
3-3 · #87
38
Rice
1-5 · #121
17
Spread
TLSA -3.5
✓ TLSA W ATS
Total
47.5 ▲1
▲ Over 55 · Q4
Projected
25–21
✓ TLSA won
Trend: RICE ATS ✗ Model: TLSA by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Troy
3-2 · #98
6
4-2 · #81
33
Spread
UL -3
✓ UL W ATS
Total
49.5 ▲2
▼ Under 39
Projected
22–25
✓ UL won
Trend: UL ATS ✓ Model: TROY by 1 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
1-5 · #100
30
4-2 · #48
48
Spread
ORST -18.5
✓ WSU W ATS
Total
52.5
▲ Over 78 · Q4
Projected
15–33
✓ ORST won
Trend: ORST ATS ✗ Model: WSU by 2.5 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-3 · #40
35
5-0 · #3
43
Spread
MIA -20.5
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
57.5 ▲4
▲ Over 78 · OT
Projected
19–39
✓ MIA won
Trend: MIA ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: MIA by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-4 · #57
31
3-3 · #60
21
Spread
VAN -5.5
✓ ARK W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼2
▲ Over 52 · Q3
Projected
23–28
✗ VAN lost
Trend: Under ✗ Model: ARK by 1 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
TCU
2-3 · #36
17
4-1 · #38
6
Spread
BAY -3.5
✓ TCU W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼1
▼ Under 23
Projected
23–27
✗ BAY lost
Trend: Under ✓ Model: BAY by 1 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
2-4 · #131
2
4-2 · #76
29
Spread
USF -20.5
✓ USF W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼3
▼ Under 31
Projected
13–33
✓ USF won
Trend: USF ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: USF by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
2-3 · #109
17
5-1 · #74
31
Spread
NDSU -14.5
✓ NEV W ATS
Total
42.5 ▼4
▲ Over 48 · Q4
Projected
16–31
✓ NDSU won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: NDSU by 0 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-4 · #103
23
1-4 · #127
13
Spread
ARST -5.5
✓ ARST W ATS
Total
61.5 ▲6
▼ Under 36
Projected
31–26
✓ ARST won
Trend: ARST ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: USM by 2 ✗ Model: Under 4 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
6-0 · #1
24
BYU
5-0 · #14
28
Spread
ND -10.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
47.5 ▼7
▲ Over 52 · Q4
Projected
30–20
✗ ND lost
Trend: BYU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: BYU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-1 · #33
7
UCLA
5-0 · #16
17
Spread
UCLA -1.5
✓ UCLA W ATS
Total
42.5 ▼7
▼ Under 24
Projected
22–25
✓ UCLA won
Trend: UCLA ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: UCLA by 7.5 ✓ Model: Over 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-1 · #26
21
3-2 · #23
13
Spread
OU -7
✓ UK W ATS
Total
44.5 ▲3
▼ Under 34
Projected
19–26
✗ OU lost
Trend: UK ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: OU by 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-1 · #44
32
5-1 · #21
35
Spread
HOU -4
✓ OKST W ATS
Total
62.5 ▲5
▲ Over 67 · Q4
Projected
26–32
✓ HOU won
Trend: OKST ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: HOU by 7 ✗ Model: Under 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
3-3 · #22
34
2-3 · #70
26
Spread
LOU -14.5
✓ SYR W ATS
Total
56.5 ▲1
▲ Over 60 · Q4
Projected
35–22
✓ LOU won
Trend: LOU ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: SYR by 5.5 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Navy
2-3 · #89
34
UTSA
5-1 · #71
38
Spread
UTSA -5.5
✓ NAVY W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼3
▲ Over 72 · Q4
Projected
23–30
✓ UTSA won
Trend: UTSA ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: UTSA by 5.5 ✗ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
3-2 · #83
24
0-5 · #137
0
Spread
LT -13.5
✓ LT W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲3
▼ Under 24
Projected
34–20
✓ LT won
Trend: LT ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: LT by 2.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
3-3 · #111
24
UTEP
1-5 · #136
11
Spread
SJSU -6.5
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼6
▼ Under 35
Projected
29–22
✓ SJSU won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: SJSU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Ohio
4-2 · #96
48
1-5 · #138
7
Spread
OHIO -17.5
✓ OHIO W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼3
▲ Over 55 · Q4
Projected
33–17
✓ OHIO won
Trend: OHIO ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: SAC by 7 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Conf
Utah
5-0 · #10
27
2-3 · #63
24
Spread
UTAH -15.5
✓ COLO W ATS
Total
49.5
▲ Over 51 · Q4
Projected
33–17
✓ UTAH won
Trend: UTAH ATS ✗ Model: UTAH by 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-1 · #20
41
3-3 · #85
7
Spread
WAKE -10
✓ WAKE W ATS
Total
54.5 ▲1
▼ Under 48
Projected
32–22
✓ WAKE won
Trend: WAKE ATS ✓ Model: CAL by 1 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-2 · #80
23
2-4 · #108
26
Spread
FRES -6.5
✓ SDSU W ATS
Total
46.5 ▲3
▲ Over 49 · Q4
Projected
26–19
✗ FRES lost
Trend: FRES ATS ✗Trend: Over ✓ Model: FRES by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
4-1 · #56
21
1-5 · #118
10
Spread
UNM -14.5
✓ HAW W ATS
Total
46.5 ▼2
▼ Under 31
Projected
31–17
✓ UNM won
Trend: UNM ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: HAW by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
5-1 · #13
14
3-2 · #9
17
Spread
ORE -6.5
✓ NEB W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼1
▼ Under 31
Projected
24–31
✓ ORE won
Trend: NEB ATS ✓ Model: ORE by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 4 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total