FinalCurrentUpcomingWeek 2: 1st-half lines & halftime results ›Spread edge and Total edge = our projection vs the market ⓘ · Trend = this season’s results

Week in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below
Games4949 final · 0 to play
Favorites ATS23-2647% covered
Upsets10outright
Over / Under22-2745% over
Model Favorite39-1080% won
Did the team the spread moved toward cover? ATS vs the closing line, by how far it moved
Moved towardThis week20262024–2026
Any move
25–2154%
178–153–654%
789–801–850%
1.5+ pts
19–1654%
111–93–354%
446–443–450%
3+ pts
12–957%
61–49–155%
215–206–251%
5+ pts
6–367%
18–1358%
47–4551%
7+ pts
0–10%
3–175%
13–765%
Covered–didn’t–push; % leaves out pushes and is grey under 10 games; green or red from 10 games. ClickTap a row or count to filter.
Sort by
⌨ Shortcuts

Group the list

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.

Jump to

Friday, Sep 11

2
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #77
21
0-1 · #79
28
Spread
BC -3
✓ BC W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼2
▼ Under 49
Projected
27–31
✓ BC won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: BC by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #19
38
1-0 · #46
21
Spread
MIZ -4
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼2
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
29–25
✓ MIZ won
Trend: KU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: MIZ by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3

Saturday, Sep 12

47
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #66
20
1-0 · #24
48
Spread
TA&M -15.5
✓ TA&M W ATS
Total
51.5
▲ Over 68 · Q4
Projected
17–33
✓ TA&M won
Model: TA&M by 3 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #23
10
1-0 · #34
17
Spread
OU -5.5
✓ MICH W ATS
Total
43.5 ▼2
▼ Under 27
Projected
25–21
✗ OU lost
Trend: OU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: MICH by 4 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #32
27
1-0 · #104
9
Spread
PSU -24.5
✓ TEM W ATS
Total
49.5 ▼2
▼ Under 36
Projected
38–14
✓ PSU won
Trend: PSU ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: TEM by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #100
7
1-0 · #41
34
Spread
KSU -17.5
✓ KSU W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼3
▼ Under 41
Projected
15–32
✓ KSU won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: WSU by 3.5 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #112
21
1-0 · #45
44
Spread
VT -17.5
✓ VT W ATS
Total
47.5 ▼4
▲ Over 65 · Q3
Projected
18–34
✓ VT won
Trend: VT ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: ODU by 7.5 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #20
38
1-0 · #59
36
Spread
WAKE -2.5
✓ PUR W ATS
Total
51.5 ▲2
▲ Over 74 · OT
Projected
27–24
✓ WAKE won
Trend: Over ✓ Model: WAKE by 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
1-0 · #76
28
Army
1-0 · #78
24
Spread
ARMY -3
✓ USF W ATS
Total
45.5 ▼7
▲ Over 52 · Q4
Projected
25–26
✗ ARMY lost
Trend: ARMY ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: USF by 12.5 ✓ Model: Over 5 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #94
27
0-1 · #92
24
Spread
ECU -6.5
✓ APP W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼1
▼ Under 51
Projected
24–31
✗ ECU lost
Trend: APP ATS ✓ Model: ECU by 4.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #115
20
1-0 · #4
70
Spread
UGA -40.5
✓ UGA W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲3
▲ Over 90 · Q3
Projected
7–47
✓ UGA won
Trend: UGA ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: UGA by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #9
31
0-1 · #44
39
Spread
ORE -24.5
✓ OKST W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼5
▲ Over 70 · Q4
Projected
38–12
✗ ORE lost
Trend: ORE ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: ORE by 6 ✗ Model: Under 5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
Rice
1-0 · #121
0
1-0 · #1
52
Spread
ND -44.5
✓ ND W ATS
Total
54.5 ▲2
▼ Under 52
Projected
2–47
✓ ND won
Trend: Over ✗ Model: ND by 1 ✓ Model: Under 6 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
1-0 · #5
45
1-0 · #26
17
Spread
ALA -9.5
✓ ALA W ATS
Total
47.5 ▼1
▲ Over 62 · Q3
Projected
30–19
✓ ALA won
Model: ALA by 7.5 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Conf
1-0 · #31
17
BYU
1-0 · #14
28
Spread
BYU -6.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
49.5 ▼2
▼ Under 45
Projected
22–29
✓ BYU won
Trend: Under ✓ Model: BYU by 1 ✓ Model: Over 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #95
14
1-0 · #42
16
Spread
WASH -28.5
✓ USU W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼1
▼ Under 30
Projected
13–42
✓ WASH won
Trend: WASH ATS ✗ Model: USU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #29
38
1-0 · #65
13
Spread
MSST -1.5
✓ MSST W ATS
Total
53.5
▼ Under 51
Projected
28–26
✓ MSST won
Trend: MSST ATS ✓ Model: MSST by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
UCF
1-0 · #55
7
1-0 · #39
12
Spread
PITT -7.5
✓ UCF W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲4
▼ Under 19
Projected
23–31
✓ PITT won
Trend: Over ✗ Model: PITT by 2 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Conf
0-1 · #85
21
1-0 · #70
18
Spread
SYR -4
✓ CAL W ATS
Total
56.5 ▲4
▼ Under 39
Projected
24–29
✗ SYR lost
Trend: SYR ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: SYR by 4.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
Duke
1-0 · #43
31
1-0 · #53
27
Spread
ILL -6
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼5
▲ Over 58 · Q3
Projected
24–30
✗ ILL lost
Trend: DUKE ATS ✓Trend: Under ✗ Model: DUKE by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #128
7
1-0 · #69
35
Spread
MSU -17.5
✓ MSU W ATS
Total
49.5 ▼2
▼ Under 42
Projected
15–33
✓ MSU won
Trend: MSU ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: MSU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #72
38
1-0 · #93
14
Spread
MD -11.5
✓ MD W ATS
Total
52.5 ▼1
▼ Under 52
Projected
33–23
✓ MD won
Model: CONN by 5 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
UTSA
1-0 · #71
31
0-1 · #58
26
Spread
TXST -1.5
✓ UTSA W ATS
Total
65.5 ▲1
▼ Under 57
Projected
32–33
✗ TXST lost
Model: UTSA by 4 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #137
20
UAB
0-1 · #107
26
Spread
UAB -9.5
✓ ULM W ATS
Total
53.5 ▼1
▼ Under 46
Projected
23–33
✓ UAB won
Trend: UAB ATS ✗ Model: UAB by 4.5 ✗ Model: Over 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
UNLV
1-1 · #84
6
0-1 · #54
44
Spread
UNLV -3
✓ UNT W ATS
Total
58.5 ▼3
▼ Under 50
Projected
31–30
✗ UNLV lost
Trend: UNT ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: UNT by 8.5 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #113
26
1-0 · #60
35
Spread
VAN -20.5
✓ DEL W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼1
▲ Over 61 · Q4
Projected
21–43
✓ VAN won
Model: VAN by 7.5 ✗ Model: Over 9.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
2-0 · #62
20
0-1 · #37
38
Spread
BOIS -9.5
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
54.5 ▲2
▲ Over 58 · Q4
Projected
23–32
✓ BOIS won
Trend: BOIS ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: MEM by 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #125
20
0-1 · #105
33
Spread
FIU -8.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
47.5 ▼4
▲ Over 53 · Q4
Projected
18–27
✓ FIU won
Trend: BUFF ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: BUFF by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #99
27
Ohio
0-1 · #96
29
Spread
OHIO -1.5
✓ OHIO W ATS
Total
48.5
▲ Over 56 · OT
Projected
25–27
✓ OHIO won
Model: OHIO by 4 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: OT
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #11
45
0-1 · #68
24
Spread
TENN -12.5
✓ TENN W ATS
Total
55.5 ▼1
▲ Over 69 · Q4
Projected
36–24
✓ TENN won
Trend: TENN ATS ✓ Model: GT by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 5.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #129
7
1-0 · #13
56
Spread
NEB -30.5
✓ NEB W ATS
Total
48.5
▲ Over 63 · Q4
Projected
9–39
✓ NEB won
Trend: NEB ATS ✓ Model: BGSU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #87
23
0-1 · #124
17
Spread
TLSA -12.5
✓ SHSU W ATS
Total
51.5 ▼2
▼ Under 40
Projected
31–20
✓ TLSA won
Trend: TLSA ATS ✗Trend: Under ✓ Model: SHSU by 6.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #101
24
0-1 · #86
28
Spread
TULN -9.5
✓ USA W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼7
▲ Over 52 · Q4
Projected
19–29
✓ TULN won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: TULN by 5 ✗ Model: Under 1 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #91
31
1-0 · #117
17
Spread
KENN -7.5
✓ GAST W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲5
▼ Under 48
Projected
24–31
✗ KENN lost
Trend: GAST ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: GAST by 0.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #126
26
0-1 · #114
28
Spread
MRSH -11.5
✓ MTSU W ATS
Total
56.5 ▼1
▼ Under 54
Projected
22–33
✓ MRSH won
Trend: MTSU ATS ✓ Model: MTSU by 1 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #108
10
UCLA
1-0 · #16
28
Spread
UCLA -13.5
✓ UCLA W ATS
Total
53.5 ▲5
▼ Under 38
Projected
19–32
✓ UCLA won
Trend: UCLA ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: SDSU by 3 ✗ Model: Under 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #2
23
1-0 · #8
24
Spread
TEX -2.5
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
50.5 ▲3
▼ Under 47
Projected
25–26
✓ TEX won
Trend: TEX ATS ✗Trend: Over ✗ Model: OSU by 6.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #83
14
LSU
1-0 · #6
45
Spread
LSU -34.5
✓ LT W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼1
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
7–40
✓ LSU won
Trend: LSU ATS ✗ Model: LT by 4.5 ✓ Model: Under 7.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #15
35
0-1 · #48
24
Spread
TTU -25.5
✓ ORST W ATS
Total
52.5 ▲3
▲ Over 59 · Q4
Projected
37–12
✓ TTU won
Trend: ORST ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: TTU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #50
13
Iowa
1-0 · #27
16
Spread
IOWA -14
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
42.5 ▲1
▼ Under 29
Projected
16–29
✓ IOWA won
Trend: IOWA ATS ✗ Model: ISU by 3 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
Navy
1-0 · #89
30
0-1 · #102
38
Spread
NAVY -4.5
✓ FAU W ATS
Total
59.5 ▲2
▲ Over 68 · Q4
Projected
33–29
✗ NAVY lost
Trend: FAU ATS ✓Trend: Over ✓ Model: FAU by 1 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
0-1 · #135
9
1-0 · #12
41
Spread
MISS -44.5
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
59.5 ▼2
▼ Under 50
Projected
8–52
✓ MISS won
Trend: CLT ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: CLT by 3 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #127
8
1-0 · #25
43
Spread
AUB -32.5
✓ AUB W ATS
Total
56.5 ▲4
▼ Under 51
Projected
9–40
✓ AUB won
Trend: AUB ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: USM by 9.5 ✗ Model: Under 8 ✓ Cover settled: Q3
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #82
7
0-1 · #52
22
Spread
CLEM -20.5
✓ GASO W ATS
Total
54.5 ▼3
▼ Under 29
Projected
19–39
✓ CLEM won
Trend: GASO ATS ✓Trend: Under ✓ Model: GASO by 5.5 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Conf
2-0 · #74
38
1-0 · #90
32
Spread
NDSU -1.5
✓ NDSU W ATS
Total
48.5 ▼1
▲ Over 70 · Q4
Projected
27–25
✓ NDSU won
Trend: AFA ATS ✗ Model: NDSU by 2 ✓ Model: Over 3 ✓ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #57
10
Utah
1-0 · #10
43
Spread
UTAH -13.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
Total
55.5 ▲2
▼ Under 53
Projected
25–40
✓ UTAH won
Trend: UTAH ATS ✓Trend: Over ✗ Model: UTAH by 5 ✓ Model: Over 9.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #138
3
0-1 · #80
49
Spread
FRES -17.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
43.5 ▼5
▲ Over 52 · Q3
Projected
13–29
✓ FRES won
Trend: Under ✗ Model: SAC by 5 ✗ Model: Under 2 ✗ Cover settled: Q2
Final · Non-conf
1-0 · #81
30
USC
2-0 · #18
49
Spread
USC -30.5
✓ UL W ATS
Total
58.5 ▼5
▲ Over 79 · Q4
Projected
14–45
✓ USC won
Trend: USC ATS ✗Trend: Under ✗ Model: USC by 3.5 ✗ Cover settled: Q1
Final · Non-conf
1-1 · #119
19
0-2 · #118
29
Spread
HAW -7.5
✓ HAW W ATS
Total
50.5 ▼1
▼ Under 48
Projected
20–28
✓ HAW won
Trend: NMSU ATS ✗ Model: HAW by 2 ✓ Model: Under 2 ✓ Cover settled: Q4
Loading…
StatusMatchupSpreadMoveTotalModelSignalDetails
Loading…
Hover a column name for what it means. Records are before kickoff; #N = power rank. Data signal badges: green = ATS, teal = Over, purple = Under; solid = moderate or strong lean (blue left edge on the row); ✓/✗ = how the lean did. ↗ Line toward model the line (or total) has moved toward the model's pick since the open; hover it for how such picks have done. small sample · QB ⓘ quarterback on the injury report (hover or tap it to see who). In our 2023–26 backtest, moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) and total leans 21-19 (53%) over 2024–26, so treat them as context, not picks.
Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total