Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games120120 final · 0 to play
Lines moved841+ pt since the open · 120 with a line
Totals moved1001+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS51-6943% covered
Upsets34outright
Over / Under61-5951% over
Model Favorite82-3868% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
VAN @ SCVAN -18.5 → VAN -9.59 → SC155.5 → 155.5no move
BYU @ KSUBYU -14.5 → BYU -7.57 → KSU171.5 → 174.5▲ 3
HOU @ CINHOU -11.5 → HOU -4.57 → CIN131.5 → 135.5▲ 4
SAC @ WEBWEB -6.5 → WEB -6.5no move159.5 → 168.5▲ 9
VILL @ BTLRVILL -1.5 → BTLR -2.54 → BTLR146.5 → 149.5▲ 3
AMER @ BUAMER -1.5 → BU -1.53 → BU150.5 → 142.5▼ 8
BELL @ QUCQUC -3.5 → QUC -7.54 → QUC168.5 → 169.5▲ 1
UCSB @ CSUNUCSB -1.5 → CSUN -2.54 → CSUN159.5 → 156.5▼ 3
ILL @ PSUILL -18.5 → ILL -14.54 → PSU156.5 → 156.5no move
KU @ UCFKU -6.5 → KU -4.52 → UCF151.5 → 157.5▲ 6
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalConference
11-2 · #20 AP #21
76
10-4 · #48
61
Spread
NCSU -4.5
✓ UVA W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼4
▼ Under 137
Projected
77–81
✗ NCSU lost
Model: UVA by 0.1 ✓ Model: Over 6.0 ✗
FinalConference
9-4 · #19
74
10-3 · #15 AP #14
89
Spread
ALA -5.5
✓ ALA W ATS
Total
173.5 ▲2
▼ Under 163
Projected
84–90
✓ ALA won
Model: ALA by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 1.0 ✗
FinalConference
VCU
10-4 · #61
93
7-5 · #107
80
Spread
VCU -5.5
✓ VCU W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲1
▲ Over 173
Projected
84–79
✓ VCU won
Model: DUQ by 0.1 ✗ Model: Under 2.0 ✗
FinalConference
UTSA
2-9 · #192
57
8-5 · #111
76
Spread
TEM -10.5
✓ TEM W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼1
▼ Under 133
Projected
70–82
✓ TEM won
Model: TEM by 1.4 ✓ Model: Over 3.1 ✗
FinalConference
11-2 · #32
85
10-4 · #72
67
Spread
BTLR -2.5
✓ VILL W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲3
▲ Over 152
Projected
75–77
✗ BTLR lost
Model: VILL by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 2.4 ✓
FinalConference
7-6 · #52
77
9-4 · #9
71
Spread
SJU -14.5
✓ PROV W ATS
Total
166.5 ▼4
▼ Under 148
Projected
78–92
✗ SJU lost
Model: PROV by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 4.1 ✗
FinalConference
12-2 · #68
78
9-5 · #89
81
Spread
WAKE -5.5
✓ VT W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲3
▲ Over 159
Projected
77–81
✓ WAKE won
Model: VT by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.4 ✓
FinalConference
11-3 · #35
73
Pitt
7-7 · #74
68
Spread
CLEM -3.5
✓ CLEM W ATS
Total
135.5
▲ Over 141
Projected
71–68
✓ CLEM won
Model: PITT by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 3.8 ✓
FinalConference
5-8 · #229
82
5-8 · #243
97
Spread
CAM -3.5
✓ CAM W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼4
▲ Over 179
Projected
76–79
✓ CAM won
Model: NE by 0.7 ✗ Model: Over 1.0 ✓
FinalConference
12-1 · #45
80
10-3 · #12 AP #15
102
Spread
TTU -12.5
✓ TTU W ATS
Total
167.5 ▼1
▲ Over 182
Projected
78–87
✓ TTU won
Model: OKST by 2.7 ✗ Model: Under 2.4 ✗
FinalConference
9-4 · #21
100
12-1 · #34 AP #23
104
Spread
UGA -6.5
✓ AUB W ATS
Total
173.5
▲ Over 204
Projected
86–89
✓ UGA won
Model: AUB by 2.6 ✓ Model: Over 1.4 ✓
FinalConference
5-7 · #211
76
Army
5-7 · #288
69
Spread
COLG -7.5
✓ ARMY W ATS
Total
147.5
▼ Under 145
Projected
80–74
✓ COLG won
Model: ARMY by 2.0 ✓ Model: Over 6.9 ✗
FinalConference
6-6 · #153
64
4-9 · #261
62
Spread
BU -1.5
✓ AMER W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼8
▼ Under 126
Projected
74–75
✗ BU lost
Model: BU by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 6.4 ✗
FinalConference
3-8 · #334
73
8-3 · #151
77
Spread
KENT -16.5
✓ NIU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▼1
▼ Under 150
Projected
72–88
✓ KENT won
Model: NIU by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 2.8 ✗
FinalConference
6-7 · #186
80
2-9 · #286
61
Spread
UVM -7.5
✓ UVM W ATS
Total
139.5 ▲2
▲ Over 141
Projected
76–68
✓ UVM won
Model: UNH by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 ✓
FinalConference
3-8 · #227
71
VMI
2-9 · #320
79
Spread
UTC -6.5
✓ VMI W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲2
▲ Over 150
Projected
78–73
✗ UTC lost
Model: VMI by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.8 ✓
FinalConference
7-5 · #248
95
0-11 · #339
86
Spread
WOF -9.5
✓ CIT W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲2
▲ Over 181
Projected
76–68
✓ WOF won
Model: CIT by 1.2 ✓ Model: Under 1.3 ✗
FinalConference
6-7 · #224
74
3-12 · #221
67
Spread
USM -3.5
✓ USM W ATS
Total
129.5
▲ Over 141
Projected
69–65
✓ USM won
Model: USM by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 4.2 ✓
FinalConference
2-11 · #208
89
7-7 · #283
71
Spread
CCU -6.5
✓ GAST W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲5
▲ Over 160
Projected
70–75
✗ CCU lost
Model: GAST by 0.6 ✓ Model: Under 3.6 ✗
FinalConference
BYU
12-1 · #24 AP #10
83
9-4 · #83
73
Spread
BYU -7.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
174.5 ▲3
▼ Under 156
Projected
88–78
✓ BYU won
Model: BYU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 8.6 ✓
FinalConference
12-1 · #2 AP #8
67
8-5 · #30
60
Spread
HOU -4.5
✓ HOU W ATS
Total
135.5 ▲4
▼ Under 127
Projected
70–62
✓ HOU won
Model: HOU by 3.6 ✓ Model: Under 3.2 ✓
FinalConference
13-0 · #22 AP #11
83
9-4 · #79
71
Spread
VAN -9.5
✓ VAN W ATS
Total
155.5
▼ Under 154
Projected
84–75
✓ VAN won
Model: SC by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 4.2 ✗
FinalConference
10-3 · #16 AP #17
75
UCF
11-1 · #39
81
Spread
KU -4.5
✓ UCF W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲6
▼ Under 156
Projected
80–76
✗ KU lost
Model: UCF by 1.0 ✓ Model: Under 2.1 ✓
FinalConference
3-10 · #124
55
9-4 · #101
77
Spread
GW -16.5
✓ GW W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼3
▼ Under 132
Projected
69–83
✓ GW won
Model: LAS by 1.9 ✗ Model: Over 1.8 ✗
FinalConference
10-4 · #91
70
5-9 · #113
68
Spread
DAY -7.5
✓ LUC W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼3
▼ Under 138
Projected
78–67
✓ DAY won
Model: DAY by 3.3 ✗ Model: Over 4.7 ✗
FinalConference
9-2 · #29
63
TCU
10-3 · #40
69
Spread
TCU -2.5
✓ TCU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼1
▼ Under 132
Projected
80–79
✗ BAY lost
Model: BAY by 3.0 ✗ Model: Over 4.6 ✗
FinalConference
5-8 · #325
77
4-8 · #183
86
Spread
PRES -1.5
✓ PRES W ATS
Total
137.5 ▲2
▲ Over 163
Projected
68–71
✓ PRES won
Model: PRES by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✓
FinalConference
3-9 · #271
83
7-6 · #326
86
Spread
CHSO -4.5
✓ UNCA W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼2
▲ Over 169
Projected
74–77
✓ CHSO won
Model: UNCA by 1.4 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗
FinalConference
6-7 · #218
67
10-3 · #90
80
Spread
HPU -16.5
✓ LONG W ATS
Total
160.5
▼ Under 147
Projected
74–90
✓ HPU won
Model: LONG by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 3.8 ✗
FinalConference
9-5 · #49
77
8-6 · #66
86
Spread
DEP -2.5
✓ DEP W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲3
▲ Over 163
Projected
73–75
✓ DEP won
Model: XAV by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.2 ✗
FinalConference
Navy
7-5 · #199
65
4-8 · #317
58
Spread
NAVY -5.5
✓ NAVY W ATS
Total
137.5 ▲1
▼ Under 123
Projected
72–68
✓ NAVY won
Model: HC by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 2.4 ✗
FinalConference
5-8 · #201
87
4-10 · #336
90
Spread
SDST -7.5
✓ UND W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲2
▲ Over 177
Projected
79–72
✗ SDST lost
Model: UND by 1.0 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗
FinalConference
Ohio
5-7 · #128
68
6-7 · #188
67
Spread
OHIO -2.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
150.5
▼ Under 135
Projected
75–75
✓ OHIO won
Model: EMU by 2.1 ✓ Model: Under 0.4 ✓
FinalConference
7-4 · #200
101
8-5 · #209
100
Spread
BGSU -1.5
✓ MASS W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲3
▲ Over 201
Projected
76–75
✓ BGSU won
Model: MASS by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.9 ✗
FinalConference
2-9 · #181
72
10-2 · #237
85
Spread
BUF -6.5
✓ BUF W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲4
▲ Over 157
Projected
68–75
✓ BUF won
Model: BUF by 0.8 ✓ Model: Under 2.1 ✗
FinalConference
NJIT
4-10 · #316
73
1-11 · #272
65
Spread
BING -3.5
✓ NJIT W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼1
▼ Under 138
Projected
72–73
✗ BING lost
Model: NJIT by 2.4 ✓ Model: Over 4.1 ✗
FinalConference
2-10 · #290
56
1-13 · #323
51
Spread
BRY -1.5
✓ BRY W ATS
Total
125.5 ▼3
▼ Under 107
Projected
65–63
✓ BRY won
Model: BRY by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 2.8 ✗
FinalConference
1-11 · #301
71
2-10 · #307
83
Spread
UML -2.5
✓ UML W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼5
▲ Over 154
Projected
76–79
✓ UML won
Model: UML by 1.0 ✓ Model: Over 4.7 ✓
FinalConference
8-4 · #166
70
5-9 · #262
67
Spread
HOF -4.5
✓ DREX W ATS
Total
131.5 ▼5
▲ Over 137
Projected
72–64
✓ HOF won
Model: HOF by 2.7 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 ✓
FinalConference
3-9 · #303
73
4-8 · #240
93
Spread
CARK -11.5
✓ CARK W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 166
Projected
68–79
✓ CARK won
Model: STET by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.6 ✗
FinalConference
2-10 · #294
76
5-6 · #298
88
Spread
EKU -1.5
✓ WGA W ATS
Total
156.5
▲ Over 164
Projected
79–79
✗ EKU lost
Model: WGA by 1.2 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✓
FinalConference
7-6 · #95
53
9-5 · #94
65
Spread
GT -6.5
✓ GT W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲2
▼ Under 118
Projected
70–75
✓ GT won
Model: BC by 1.9 ✗ Model: Under 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
13-1 · #44 AP #12
83
SMU
11-2 · #55
97
Spread
SMU -1.5
✓ SMU W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲4
▲ Over 180
Projected
79–79
✓ SMU won
Model: UNC by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 2.0 ✓
FinalConference
6-7 · #76
76
Rice
4-8 · #177
70
Spread
MEM -7.5
✓ RICE W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲1
▲ Over 146
Projected
78–68
✓ MEM won
Model: MEM by 3.1 ✗ Model: Over 1.2 ✓
FinalConference
5-6 · #157
78
2-10 · #270
75
Spread
TOL -7.5
✓ CMU W ATS
Total
158.5 ▼1
▼ Under 153
Projected
81–75
✓ TOL won
Model: CMU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.7 ✓
FinalConference
6-7 · #158
78
8-4 · #171
74
Spread
ARST -10.5
✓ JMU W ATS
Total
158.5 ▼2
▼ Under 152
Projected
77–86
✗ ARST lost
Model: JMU by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 4.6 ✗
FinalConference
FGCU
4-8 · #266
72
3-7 · #292
55
Spread
FGCU -2.5
✓ FGCU W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼4
▼ Under 127
Projected
78–78
✓ FGCU won
Model: UNA by 2.3 ✗ Model: Over 8.0 ✗
FinalConference
3-8 · #295
76
98
Spread
QUC -7.5
✓ QUC W ATS
Total
169.5 ▲1
▲ Over 174
Projected
82–87
✓ QUC won
Model: BELL by 3.1 ✗ Model: Under 0.4 ✗
FinalConference
10-3 · #7 AP #19
75
10-3 · #18 AP #18
86
Spread
TENN -1.5
✓ ARK W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲5
▲ Over 161
Projected
79–79
✗ TENN lost
Model: ARK by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.0 ✗
FinalConference
1-8 · #327
83
2-10 · #202
87
Spread
BCU -7.5
✓ FAMU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼2
▲ Over 170
Projected
70–79
✓ BCU won
Model: BCU by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 2.9 ✓
FinalConference
8-3 · #118
73
11-0 · #125
76
Spread
AKR -4.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
177.5
▼ Under 149
Projected
91–86
✗ AKR lost
Model: AKR by 0.3 ✗ Model: Under 1.1 ✓
FinalConference
9-5 · #296
93
3-11 · #234
86
Spread
GASO -1.5
✓ GASO W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲2
▲ Over 179
Projected
80–82
✗ ODU lost
Model: ODU by 3.1 ✗ Model: Under 0.2 ✗
FinalConference
8-5 · #46
70
10-3 · #31
86
Spread
OU -6.5
✓ OU W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼2
▲ Over 156
Projected
73–77
✓ OU won
Model: MISS by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 3.6 ✓
FinalConference
Duke
12-1 · #3 AP #6
91
7-7 · #81
87
Spread
DUKE -16.5
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
163.5 ▲2
▲ Over 178
Projected
87–72
✓ DUKE won
Model: FSU by 2.0 ✓ Model: Under 4.5 ✗
FinalConference
6-7 · #103
84
1-12 · #358
79
Spread
TXST -10.5
✓ ULM W ATS
Total
150.5
▲ Over 163
Projected
80–73
✓ TXST won
Model: ULM by 4.0 ✓ Model: Over 2.2 ✓
FinalConference
13-0 · #5 AP #1
97
Utah
8-5 · #73
78
Spread
ARIZ -17.5
✓ ARIZ W ATS
Total
162.5
▲ Over 175
Projected
90–72
✓ ARIZ won
Model: ARIZ by 0.6 ✓ Model: Under 1.2 ✗
FinalConference
9-5 · #105
50
12-1 · #93
61
Spread
GMU -6.5
✓ GMU W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼3
▼ Under 111
Projected
68–73
✓ GMU won
Model: URI by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 1.4 ✗
FinalConference
4-8 · #143
78
10-1 · #58
96
Spread
USU -22.5
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲4
▲ Over 174
Projected
66–84
✓ USU won
Model: SJSU by 3.9 ✓ Model: Under 1.6 ✗
FinalConference
0-13 · #348
77
5-8 · #205
88
Spread
WIN -23.5
✓ GWEB W ATS
Total
164.5 ▼2
▲ Over 165
Projected
72–92
✓ WIN won
Model: GWEB by 2.9 ✓ Model: Under 0.4 ✗
FinalConference
7-5 · #134
65
6-7 · #194
74
Spread
CSUN -2.5
✓ CSUN W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼3
▼ Under 139
Projected
80–80
✓ CSUN won
Model: UCSB by 2.0 ✗ Model: Over 3.2 ✗
FinalConference
2-11 · #305
77
8-5 · #213
79
Spread
NDSU -13.5
✓ ORU W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼1
▲ Over 156
Projected
68–81
✓ NDSU won
Model: ORU by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 3.0 ✓
FinalConference
5-6 · #275
80
6-7 · #191
81
Spread
STBK -4.5
✓ NCAT W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲1
▲ Over 161
Projected
70–74
✓ STBK won
Model: NCAT by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.9 ✓
FinalConference
6-6 · #184
82
3-9 · #284
89
Spread
SAM -2.5
✓ UNCG W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲4
▲ Over 171
Projected
76–75
✗ SAM lost
Model: UNCG by 1.3 ✓ Model: Under 0.3 ✗
FinalConference
2-8 · #215
80
7-4 · #152
77
Spread
FUR -8.5
✓ WCU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲2
▼ Under 157
Projected
72–81
✗ FUR lost
Model: FUR by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 5.0 ✓
FinalConference
5-6 · #242
71
ETSU
7-5 · #173
77
Spread
ETSU -7.5
✓ MER W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼4
▼ Under 148
Projected
71–78
✓ ETSU won
Model: MER by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 0.4 ✗
FinalConference
7-6 · #259
81
8-5 · #231
88
Spread
MRSH -7.5
✓ APP W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲2
▲ Over 169
Projected
68–73
✓ MRSH won
Model: APP by 1.7 ✓ Model: Under 0.4 ✗
FinalConference
LSU
12-1 · #51
72
10-3 · #28
75
Spread
TA&M -5.5
✓ LSU W ATS
Total
168.5 ▲2
▼ Under 147
Projected
85–87
✓ TA&M won
Model: LSU by 3.6 ✓ Model: Over 3.1 ✗
FinalConference
9-3 · #150
68
5-6 · #253
85
Spread
UVU -7.5
✓ ACU W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼3
▲ Over 153
Projected
74–67
✗ UVU lost
Model: ACU by 0.1 ✓ Model: Over 1.6 ✓
FinalConference
6-6 · #197
57
0-14 · #353
58
Spread
HOW -8.5
✓ SCST W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼5
▼ Under 115
Projected
77–71
✗ HOW lost
Model: SCST by 2.0 ✓ Model: Over 3.3 ✗
FinalConference
3-10 · #319
67
0-11 · #357
69
Spread
NORF -1.5
✓ NCCU W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼1
▼ Under 136
Projected
72–70
✗ NORF lost
Model: NORF by 0.8 ✗ Model: Under 0.2 ✓
FinalConference
1-11 · #360
86
1-12 · #280
89
Spread
JKST -5.5
✓ ALCN W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼1
▲ Over 175
Projected
74–78
✓ JKST won
Model: ALCN by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 6.9 ✓
FinalConference
1-11 · #345
49
2-13 · #364
66
Spread
UMES -6.5
✓ UMES W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼4
▼ Under 115
Projected
68–75
✓ UMES won
Model: UMES by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 5.3 ✗
FinalConference
1-15 · #352
53
2-9 · #351
51
Spread
DSU -8.5
✓ COPP W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼2
▼ Under 104
Projected
65–75
✗ DSU lost
Model: DSU by 2.3 ✗ Model: Over 0.6 ✗
FinalConference
9-2 · #193
73
3-9 · #252
63
Spread
SFA -3.5
✓ SFA W ATS
Total
137.5 ▲1
▼ Under 136
Projected
70–67
✓ SFA won
Model: SELA by 0.6 ✗ Model: Under 1.2 ✓
FinalConference
4-9 · #276
68
1-10 · #318
74
Spread
NOLA -1.5
✓ NWST W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼2
▼ Under 142
Projected
77–77
✗ NOLA lost
Model: NWST by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✗
FinalConference
4-8 · #342
58
4-8 · #285
80
Spread
NICH -6.5
✓ NICH W ATS
Total
146.5
▼ Under 138
Projected
70–78
✓ NICH won
Model: NICH by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗
FinalConference
9-4 · #228
49
Troy
7-5 · #147
59
Spread
TROY -9.5
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲6
▼ Under 108
Projected
74–81
✓ TROY won
Model: USA by 2.0 ✗ Model: Over 6.7 ✗
FinalConference
3-8 · #350
73
SIUE
6-5 · #256
72
Spread
SIUE -4.5
✓ MORE W ATS
Total
131.5 ▼4
▲ Over 145
Projected
66–71
✗ SIUE lost
Model: SIUE by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 6.2 ✓
FinalConference
5-5 · #245
84
3-9 · #222
79
Spread
TNST -1.5
✓ TNST W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲1
▲ Over 163
Projected
73–71
✓ TNST won
Model: TNST by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
80
6-5 · #258
83
Spread
LIN -9.5
✓ USI W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼1
▲ Over 163
Projected
68–79
✓ LIN won
Model: LIN by 1.4 ✗ Model: Under 0.3 ✗
FinalConference
2-9 · #361
61
7-4 · #341
65
Spread
UTM -10.5
✓ EIU W ATS
Total
133.5 ▼1
▼ Under 126
Projected
64–72
✓ UTM won
Model: EIU by 2.0 ✓ Model: Over 2.1 ✗
FinalConference
1-10 · #365
50
4-7 · #306
73
Spread
SEMO -13.5
✓ SEMO W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲1
▼ Under 123
Projected
68–81
✓ SEMO won
Model: WIU by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 0.9 ✗
FinalConference
2-10 · #216
65
3-11 · #299
72
Spread
BUCK -4.5
✓ BUCK W ATS
Total
137.5 ▲2
▼ Under 137
Projected
69–72
✓ BUCK won
Model: LEH by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 3.9 ✗
FinalConference
8-5 · #70
84
8-5 · #59
78
Spread
NU -4.5
✓ MINN W ATS
Total
138.5 ▲1
▲ Over 162
Projected
66–73
✗ NU lost
Model: NU by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
3-10 · #220
39
UNLV
5-6 · #98
67
Spread
UNLV -14.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼2
▼ Under 106
Projected
66–81
✓ UNLV won
Model: UNLV by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 4.8 ✗
FinalConference
3-8 · #300
56
4-6 · #289
73
Spread
UIW -6.5
✓ UIW W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼2
▼ Under 129
Projected
69–76
✓ UIW won
Model: UIW by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 3.0 ✗
FinalConference
2-11 · #310
79
2-10 · #314
64
Spread
LAF -1.5
✓ LAF W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼3
▼ Under 143
Projected
74–76
✗ L-MD lost
Model: L-MD by 3.1 ✗ Model: Under 2.2 ✓
FinalConference
4-9 · #329
81
6-5 · #182
79
Spread
UCD -9.5
✓ CSUB W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼2
▲ Over 160
Projected
71–82
✗ UCD lost
Model: UCD by 1.7 ✗ Model: Over 0.9 ✓
FinalConference
1-11 · #254
81
5-5 · #247
84
Spread
IDHO -6.5
✓ EWU W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲2
▲ Over 165
Projected
76–82
✓ IDHO won
Model: EWU by 0.2 ✓ Model: Under 0.3 ✗
FinalConference
0-12 · #333
74
6-6 · #214
82
Spread
LIP -18.5
✓ UNF W ATS
Total
172.5 ▲1
▼ Under 156
Projected
75–91
✓ LIP won
Model: UNF by 2.0 ✓ Model: Under 6.8 ✓
FinalConference
3-9 · #223
68
5-5 · #210
71
Spread
APSU -10.5
✓ JAX W ATS
Total
140.5
▼ Under 139
Projected
66–75
✓ APSU won
Model: JAX by 1.2 ✓ Model: Over 0.8 ✗
FinalConference
10-5 · #203
76
6-5 · #185
81
Spread
TAR -1.5
✓ TAR W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲3
▲ Over 157
Projected
72–74
✓ TAR won
Model: CBU by 0.1 ✗ Model: Under 1.8 ✗
FinalConference
10-3 · #65
95
9-4 · #60
89
Spread
ASU -1.5
✓ COLO W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼4
▲ Over 184
Projected
79–82
✗ ASU lost
Model: ASU by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 4.4 ✓
FinalConference
1-8 · #343
72
4-7 · #338
76
Spread
GRAM -7.5
✓ PV W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼1
▼ Under 148
Projected
73–80
✓ GRAM won
Model: PV by 0.7 ✓ Model: Under 2.7 ✓
FinalConference
2-7 · #238
63
3-8 · #287
59
Spread
RGV -2.5
✓ AMCC W ATS
Total
137.5
▼ Under 122
Projected
69–70
✗ RGV lost
Model: AMCC by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 1.9 ✗
FinalConference
UCLA
10-3 · #26
61
Iowa
11-2 · #43 AP #25
74
Spread
IOWA -6.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
140.5 ▲2
▼ Under 135
Projected
70–74
✓ IOWA won
Model: UCLA by 2.2 ✗ Model: Over 3.6 ✗
FinalConference
7-5 · #115
62
6-6 · #114
56
Spread
DAV -1.5
✓ DAV W ATS
Total
139.5 ▲1
▼ Under 118
Projected
72–73
✗ JOES lost
Model: JOES by 2.1 ✗ Model: Over 5.2 ✗
FinalConference
0-9 · #322
73
1-9 · #309
84
Spread
SOU -6.5
✓ SOU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼1
▲ Over 157
Projected
76–84
✓ SOU won
Model: SOU by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 6.5 ✓
FinalConference
5-8 · #155
62
6-7 · #165
48
Spread
TOW -8.5
✓ MONM W ATS
Total
136.5
▼ Under 110
Projected
64–72
✗ TOW lost
Model: MONM by 0.6 ✓ Model: Under 1.0 ✓
FinalConference
7-4 · #219
79
4-6 · #273
88
Spread
UNCO -1.5
✓ MONT W ATS
Total
161.5 ▼2
▲ Over 167
Projected
82–81
✗ UNCO lost
Model: MONT by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 1.0 ✓
FinalConference
4-5 · #274
93
5-6 · #344
87
Spread
IDST -3.5
✓ PRST W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼3
▲ Over 180
Projected
71–74
✗ IDST lost
Model: PRST by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 2.8 ✓
FinalConference
8-5 · #53
101
8-4 · #11
98
Spread
TEX -9.5
✓ MSST W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲1
▲ Over 199
Projected
77–84
✗ TEX lost
Model: MSST by 2.0 ✓ Model: Over 3.7 ✓
FinalConference
8-5 · #77
100
5-8 · #141
104
Spread
WICH -5.5
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
140.5 ▲2
▲ Over 204
Projected
73–67
✗ WICH lost
Model: WICH by 0.3 ✗
FinalConference
2-10 · #302
89
0-13 · #366
69
Spread
ALST -13.5
✓ ALST W ATS
Total
144.5
▲ Over 158
Projected
81–70
✓ ALST won
Model: MVSU by 2.2 ✗ Model: Over 5.9 ✓
FinalConference
4-6 · #328
83
1-10 · #363
95
Spread
AAMU -1.5
✓ UAPB W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲3
▲ Over 178
Projected
78–76
✗ AAMU lost
Model: AAMU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✓
FinalConference
10-3 · #4 AP #20
73
9-4 · #78
65
Spread
ILL -14.5
✓ PSU W ATS
Total
156.5
▼ Under 138
Projected
86–72
✓ ILL won
Model: ILL by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 1.7 ✗
FinalConference
10-3 · #96
66
5-7 · #174
65
Spread
NEV -4.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼1
▼ Under 131
Projected
77–70
✓ NEV won
Model: NEV by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 1.1 ✗
FinalConference
6-7 · #159
45
11-2 · #120
49
Spread
UNCW -12.5
✓ HAMP W ATS
Total
140.5 ▲2
▼ Under 94
Projected
65–76
✓ UNCW won
Model: HAMP by 2.0 ✓ Model: Over 0.7 ✗
FinalConference
8-5 · #149
86
4-9 · #312
64
Spread
UCI -3.5
✓ UCI W ATS
Total
160.5 ▲1
▼ Under 150
Projected
79–75
✓ UCI won
Model: UCI by 0.2 ✓ Model: Under 6.6 ✓
FinalConference
12-1 · #23 AP #5
89
9-4 · #41
73
Spread
PUR -5.5
✓ PUR W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲1
▲ Over 162
Projected
82–73
✓ PUR won
Model: PUR by 3.7 ✓ Model: Over 1.7 ✓
FinalConference
9-3 · #122
58
9-3 · #82
78
Spread
UNM -7.5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼1
▼ Under 136
Projected
73–79
✓ UNM won
Model: WYO by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 0.3 ✗
FinalConference
8-4 · #87
70
8-4 · #80
60
Spread
GCU -6.5
✓ CSU W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼2
▼ Under 130
Projected
70–74
✗ GCU lost
Model: CSU by 3.1 ✓ Model: Over 0.6 ✗
FinalConference
0-12 · #335
73
3-9 · #279
66
Spread
OMA -8.5
✓ KC W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼2
▼ Under 139
Projected
70–78
✗ OMA lost
Model: KC by 0.7 ✓
FinalConference
3-8 · #321
68
4-7 · #162
77
Spread
MTST -10.5
✓ NAU W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲2
▲ Over 145
Projected
65–75
✓ MTST won
Model: NAU by 0.3 ✓ Model: Under 3.2 ✗
FinalConference
9-4 · #1 AP #22
74
10-3 · #54
76
Spread
FLA -7.5
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼3
▼ Under 150
Projected
84–74
✗ FLA lost
Model: FLA by 2.6 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✗
FinalConference
7-5 · #257
86
1-10 · #267
77
Spread
UTA -5.5
✓ UTA W ATS
Total
138.5 ▲3
▲ Over 163
Projected
73–67
✓ UTA won
Model: UTA by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.9 ✓
FinalConference
4-9 · #164
66
2-10 · #297
74
Spread
LBSU -2.5
✓ LBSU W ATS
Total
162.5
▼ Under 140
Projected
82–83
✓ LBSU won
Model: CP by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 2.2 ✗
FinalConference
1-9 · #196
82
4-8 · #313
95
Spread
WEB -6.5
✓ WEB W ATS
Total
168.5 ▲9
▲ Over 177
Projected
78–83
✓ WEB won
Model: SAC by 0.8 ✗ Model: Under 7.8 ✗
FinalConference
8-3 · #86
107
7-4 · #75
110
Spread
SDSU -4.5
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
138.5
▲ Over 217
Projected
69–71
✓ SDSU won
Model: BOIS by 3.3 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓
FinalConference
9-2 · #140
73
9-3 · #123
83
Spread
UCSD -2.5
✓ UCSD W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲5
▲ Over 156
Projected
70–73
✓ UCSD won
Model: HAW by 0.4 ✗ Model: Under 5.5 ✗
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
11-2 · #20
76
10-4 · #48
61
NCSU -4.5 151.5 NCSU -4.4 UVA +0.1 157.5 Over 6.0 65% NCSU W L ›
Final
9-4 · #19
74
10-3 · #15
89
ALA -5.5 173.5 ALA -5.8 ALA +0.3 174.5 Over 1.0 69% ALA W L ›
Final
10-4 · #61
93
7-5 · #107
80
VCU -5.5 165.5 VCU -5.4 DUQ +0.1 163.5 Under 2.0 68% VCU L L ›
Final
2-9 · #192
57
8-5 · #111
76
TEM -10.5 149.5 TEM -11.9 TEM +1.4 152.6 Over 3.1 85% TEM W L ›
Final
11-2 · #32
85
10-4 · #72
67
BTLR -2.5 149.5 BTLR -1.0 VILL +1.5 151.9 Over 2.4 54% BTLR W W ›
Final
7-6 · #52
77
9-4 · #9
71
SJU -14.5 166.5 SJU -14.1 PROV +0.4 170.6 Over 4.1 89% SJU W L ›
Final
12-2 · #68
78
9-5 · #89
81
WAKE -5.5 153.5 WAKE -5.0 VT +0.5 157.9 Over 4.4 67% WAKE W W ›
Final
11-3 · #35
73
7-7 · #74
68
CLEM -3.5 135.5 CLEM -3.2 PITT +0.3 139.3 Over 3.8 61% CLEM L W ›
Final
5-8 · #229
82
5-8 · #243
97
CAM -3.5 154.5 CAM -2.8 NE +0.7 155.5 Over 1.0 60% CAM L W ›
Final
12-1 · #45
80
10-3 · #12
102
TTU -12.5 167.5 TTU -9.8 OKST +2.7 165.1 Under 2.4 80% TTU L L ›
Final
9-4 · #21
100
12-1 · #34
104
UGA -6.5 173.5 UGA -3.9 AUB +2.6 174.9 Over 1.4 63% UGA W W ›
Final
5-7 · #211
76
5-7 · #288
69
COLG -7.5 147.5 COLG -5.5 ARMY +2.0 154.4 Over 6.9 69% COLG W L ›
Final
6-6 · #153
64
4-9 · #261
62
BU -1.5 142.5 BU -1.9 BU +0.4 148.9 Over 6.4 56% BU L L ›
Final
3-8 · #334
73
8-3 · #151
77
KENT -16.5 157.5 KENT -15.6 NIU +0.9 160.3 Over 2.8 91% KENT W L ›
Final
6-7 · #186
80
2-9 · #286
61
UVM -7.5 139.5 UVM -7.3 UNH +0.2 144.0 Over 4.5 74% UVM L W ›
Final
3-8 · #227
71
2-9 · #320
79
UTC -6.5 149.5 UTC -5.0 VMI +1.5 150.3 Over 0.8 67% UTC W W ›
Final
7-5 · #248
95
0-11 · #339
86
WOF -9.5 144.5 WOF -8.3 CIT +1.2 143.2 Under 1.3 77% WOF W L ›
Final
6-7 · #224
74
3-12 · #221
67
USM -3.5 129.5 USM -4.8 USM +1.3 133.7 Over 4.2 66% USM W W ›
Final
2-11 · #208
89
7-7 · #283
71
CCU -6.5 148.5 CCU -5.9 GAST +0.6 144.9 Under 3.6 70% CCU W L ›
Final
12-1 · #24
83
9-4 · #83
73
BYU -7.5 174.5 BYU -9.0 BYU +1.5 165.9 Under 8.6 79% BYU W W ›
Final
12-1 · #2
67
8-5 · #30
60
HOU -4.5 135.5 HOU -8.1 HOU +3.6 132.3 Under 3.2 76% HOU W W ›
Final
13-0 · #22
83
9-4 · #79
71
VAN -9.5 155.5 VAN -9.1 SC +0.4 159.7 Over 4.2 79% VAN L L ›
Final
10-3 · #16
75
11-1 · #39
81
KU -4.5 157.5 KU -3.5 UCF +1.0 155.4 Under 2.1 62% KU W W ›
Final
3-10 · #124
55
9-4 · #101
77
GW -16.5 150.5 GW -14.6 LAS +1.9 152.3 Over 1.8 90% GW L L ›
Final
10-4 · #91
70
5-9 · #113
68
DAY -7.5 140.5 DAY -10.8 DAY +3.3 145.2 Over 4.7 83% DAY L L ›
Final
9-2 · #29
63
10-3 · #40
69
TCU -2.5 154.5 BAY -0.5 BAY +3.0 159.1 Over 4.6 52% BAY L L ›
Final
5-8 · #325
77
4-8 · #183
86
PRES -1.5 137.5 PRES -2.2 PRES +0.7 138.8 Over 1.3 58% PRES W W ›
Final
3-9 · #271
83
7-6 · #326
86
CHSO -4.5 151.5 CHSO -3.1 UNCA +1.4 151.0 Under 0.5 61% CHSO W L ›
Final
6-7 · #218
67
10-3 · #90
80
HPU -16.5 160.5 HPU -15.8 LONG +0.7 164.3 Over 3.8 92% HPU W L ›
Final
9-5 · #49
77
8-6 · #66
86
DEP -2.5 149.5 DEP -2.0 XAV +0.5 148.3 Under 1.2 57% DEP L L ›
Final
7-5 · #199
65
4-8 · #317
58
NAVY -5.5 137.5 NAVY -4.4 HC +1.1 139.9 Over 2.4 65% NAVY L L ›
Final
5-8 · #201
87
4-10 · #336
90
SDST -7.5 152.5 SDST -6.5 UND +1.0 151.0 Under 1.5 71% SDST W L ›
Final
5-7 · #128
68
6-7 · #188
67
OHIO -2.5 150.5 OHIO -0.4 EMU +2.1 150.1 Under 0.4 51% OHIO W W ›
Final
7-4 · #200
101
8-5 · #209
100
BGSU -1.5 152.5 BGSU -1.0 MASS +0.5 150.6 Under 1.9 53% BGSU W L ›
Final
2-9 · #181
72
10-2 · #237
85
BUF -6.5 145.5 BUF -7.3 BUF +0.8 143.4 Under 2.1 74% BUF W L ›
Final
4-10 · #316
73
1-11 · #272
65
BING -3.5 140.5 BING -1.1 NJIT +2.4 144.6 Over 4.1 54% BING W L ›
Final
2-10 · #290
56
1-13 · #323
51
BRY -1.5 125.5 BRY -2.0 BRY +0.5 128.3 Over 2.8 57% BRY W L ›
Final
1-11 · #301
71
2-10 · #307
83
UML -2.5 150.5 UML -3.5 UML +1.0 155.2 Over 4.7 62% UML W W ›
Final
8-4 · #166
70
5-9 · #262
67
HOF -4.5 131.5 HOF -7.2 HOF +2.7 136.0 Over 4.5 74% HOF L W ›
Final
3-9 · #303
73
4-8 · #240
93
CARK -11.5 147.5 CARK -10.0 STET +1.5 146.9 Under 0.6 81% CARK L L ›
Final
2-10 · #294
76
5-6 · #298
88
EKU -1.5 156.5 EKU -0.3 WGA +1.2 157.8 Over 1.3 51% EKU W W ›
Final
7-6 · #95
53
9-5 · #94
65
GT -6.5 145.5 GT -4.6 BC +1.9 145.2 Under 0.3 66% GT L W ›
Final
13-1 · #44
83
11-2 · #55
97
SMU -1.5 155.5 SMU -0.6 UNC +0.9 157.5 Over 2.0 52% SMU L W ›
Final
6-7 · #76
76
4-8 · #177
70
MEM -7.5 144.5 MEM -10.6 MEM +3.1 145.7 Over 1.2 82% MEM L W ›
Final
5-6 · #157
78
2-10 · #270
75
TOL -7.5 158.5 TOL -6.0 CMU +1.5 156.8 Under 1.7 70% TOL W W ›
Final
6-7 · #158
78
8-4 · #171
74
ARST -10.5 158.5 ARST -9.4 JMU +1.1 163.1 Over 4.6 80% ARST W L ›
Final
4-8 · #266
72
3-7 · #292
55
FGCU -2.5 147.5 FGCU -0.2 UNA +2.3 155.5 Over 8.0 51% FGCU L L ›
Final
3-8 · #295
76
QUC -7.5 169.5 QUC -4.4 BELL +3.1 169.1 Under 0.4 65% QUC L L ›
Final
10-3 · #7
75
10-3 · #18
86
TENN -1.5 158.5 TENN -0.0 ARK +1.5 157.5 Under 1.0 50% ARK W L ›
Final
1-8 · #327
83
2-10 · #202
87
BCU -7.5 145.5 BCU -8.9 BCU +1.4 148.4 Over 2.9 78% BCU L W ›
Final
8-3 · #118
73
11-0 · #125
76
AKR -4.5 177.5 AKR -4.8 AKR +0.3 176.4 Under 1.1 66% AKR L W ›
Final
9-5 · #296
93
3-11 · #234
86
GASO -1.5 161.5 ODU -1.6 ODU +3.1 161.3 Under 0.2 56% ODU L L ›
Final
8-5 · #46
70
10-3 · #31
86
OU -6.5 146.5 OU -4.1 MISS +2.4 150.1 Over 3.6 64% OU L W ›
Final
12-1 · #3
91
7-7 · #81
87
DUKE -16.5 163.5 DUKE -14.5 FSU +2.0 159.0 Under 4.5 90% DUKE W L ›
Final
6-7 · #103
84
1-12 · #358
79
TXST -10.5 150.5 TXST -6.5 ULM +4.0 152.7 Over 2.2 71% TXST W W ›
Final
13-0 · #5
97
8-5 · #73
78
ARIZ -17.5 162.5 ARIZ -18.1 ARIZ +0.6 161.3 Under 1.2 94% ARIZ W L ›
Final
9-5 · #105
50
12-1 · #93
61
GMU -6.5 139.5 GMU -5.9 URI +0.6 140.9 Over 1.4 70% GMU L L ›
Final
4-8 · #143
78
10-1 · #58
96
USU -22.5 151.5 USU -18.6 SJSU +3.9 149.9 Under 1.6 95% USU W L ›
Final
0-13 · #348
77
5-8 · #205
88
WIN -23.5 164.5 WIN -20.6 GWEB +2.9 164.1 Under 0.4 96% WIN W L ›
Final
7-5 · #134
65
6-7 · #194
74
CSUN -2.5 156.5 CSUN -0.5 UCSB +2.0 159.7 Over 3.2 52% CSUN L L ›
Final
2-11 · #305
77
8-5 · #213
79
NDSU -13.5 146.5 NDSU -12.9 ORU +0.6 149.5 Over 3.0 87% NDSU W W ›
Final
5-6 · #275
80
6-7 · #191
81
STBK -4.5 141.5 STBK -4.0 NCAT +0.5 143.4 Over 1.9 64% STBK W W ›
Final
6-6 · #184
82
3-9 · #284
89
SAM -2.5 151.5 SAM -1.2 UNCG +1.3 151.2 Under 0.3 54% SAM W L ›
Final
2-8 · #215
80
7-4 · #152
77
FUR -8.5 157.5 FUR -9.0 FUR +0.5 152.5 Under 5.0 78% FUR L W ›
Final
5-6 · #242
71
7-5 · #173
77
ETSU -7.5 148.5 ETSU -6.8 MER +0.7 148.9 Over 0.4 72% ETSU W L ›
Final
7-6 · #259
81
8-5 · #231
88
MRSH -7.5 141.5 MRSH -5.8 APP +1.7 141.1 Under 0.4 69% MRSH W L ›
Final
12-1 · #51
72
10-3 · #28
75
TA&M -5.5 168.5 TA&M -1.9 LSU +3.6 171.6 Over 3.1 57% TA&M W L ›
Final
9-3 · #150
68
5-6 · #253
85
UVU -7.5 139.5 UVU -7.4 ACU +0.1 141.1 Over 1.6 74% UVU W W ›
Final
6-6 · #197
57
0-14 · #353
58
HOW -8.5 144.5 HOW -6.5 SCST +2.0 147.8 Over 3.3 72% HOW W L ›
Final
3-10 · #319
67
0-11 · #357
69
NORF -1.5 141.5 NORF -2.3 NORF +0.8 141.3 Under 0.2 58% NORF L W ›
Final
1-11 · #360
86
1-12 · #280
89
JKST -5.5 145.5 JKST -4.0 ALCN +1.5 152.4 Over 6.9 64% JKST W W ›
Final
1-11 · #345
49
2-13 · #364
66
UMES -6.5 138.5 UMES -6.9 UMES +0.4 143.8 Over 5.3 73% UMES W L ›
Final
1-15 · #352
53
2-9 · #351
51
DSU -8.5 139.5 DSU -10.8 DSU +2.3 140.1 Over 0.6 83% DSU L L ›
Final
9-2 · #193
73
3-9 · #252
63
SFA -3.5 137.5 SFA -2.9 SELA +0.6 136.3 Under 1.2 60% SFA L W ›
Final
4-9 · #276
68
1-10 · #318
74
NOLA -1.5 149.5 NOLA -0.8 NWST +0.7 154.0 Over 4.5 53% NOLA W L ›
Final
4-8 · #342
58
4-8 · #285
80
NICH -6.5 146.5 NICH -8.1 NICH +1.6 147.0 Over 0.5 76% NICH W L ›
Final
9-4 · #228
49
7-5 · #147
59
TROY -9.5 148.5 TROY -7.5 USA +2.0 155.2 Over 6.7 74% TROY L L ›
Final
3-8 · #350
73
6-5 · #256
72
SIUE -4.5 131.5 SIUE -4.9 SIUE +0.4 137.7 Over 6.2 67% SIUE L W ›
Final
5-5 · #245
84
3-9 · #222
79
TNST -1.5 144.5 TNST -2.1 TNST +0.6 144.8 Over 0.3 57% TNST W W ›
Final
6-5 · #258
83
LIN -9.5 147.5 LIN -10.9 LIN +1.4 147.2 Under 0.3 83% LIN L L ›
Final
2-9 · #361
61
7-4 · #341
65
UTM -10.5 133.5 UTM -8.5 EIU +2.0 135.6 Over 2.1 77% UTM W L ›
Final
1-10 · #365
50
4-7 · #306
73
SEMO -13.5 147.5 SEMO -12.7 WIU +0.8 148.4 Over 0.9 87% SEMO L L ›
Final
2-10 · #216
65
3-11 · #299
72
BUCK -4.5 137.5 BUCK -3.5 LEH +1.0 141.4 Over 3.9 62% BUCK L L ›
Final
8-5 · #70
84
8-5 · #59
78
NU -4.5 138.5 NU -6.3 NU +1.8 138.8 Over 0.3 71% NU L W ›
Final
3-10 · #220
39
5-6 · #98
67
UNLV -14.5 142.5 UNLV -14.8 UNLV +0.3 147.3 Over 4.8 90% UNLV W L ›
Final
3-8 · #300
56
4-6 · #289
73
UIW -6.5 141.5 UIW -7.2 UIW +0.7 144.5 Over 3.0 74% UIW W L ›
Final
2-11 · #310
79
2-10 · #314
64
LAF -1.5 152.5 L-MD -1.6 L-MD +3.1 150.3 Under 2.2 55% L-MD L W ›
Final
4-9 · #329
81
6-5 · #182
79
UCD -9.5 151.5 UCD -11.2 UCD +1.7 152.4 Over 0.9 84% UCD L W ›
Final
1-11 · #254
81
5-5 · #247
84
IDHO -6.5 158.5 IDHO -6.3 EWU +0.2 158.2 Under 0.3 71% IDHO W L ›
Final
0-12 · #333
74
6-6 · #214
82
LIP -18.5 172.5 LIP -16.5 UNF +2.0 165.8 Under 6.8 93% LIP W W ›
Final
3-9 · #223
68
5-5 · #210
71
APSU -10.5 140.5 APSU -9.3 JAX +1.2 141.3 Over 0.8 79% APSU W L ›
Final
10-5 · #203
76
6-5 · #185
81
TAR -1.5 147.5 TAR -1.4 CBU +0.1 145.7 Under 1.8 55% TAR L L ›
Final
10-3 · #65
95
9-4 · #60
89
ASU -1.5 156.5 ASU -2.4 ASU +0.9 160.9 Over 4.4 58% ASU L W ›
Final
1-8 · #343
72
4-7 · #338
76
GRAM -7.5 155.5 GRAM -6.8 PV +0.7 152.8 Under 2.7 72% GRAM W W ›
Final
2-7 · #238
63
3-8 · #287
59
RGV -2.5 137.5 RGV -0.9 AMCC +1.6 139.4 Over 1.9 53% RGV W L ›
Final
10-3 · #26
61
11-2 · #43
74
IOWA -6.5 140.5 IOWA -4.3 UCLA +2.2 144.1 Over 3.6 65% IOWA L L ›
Final
7-5 · #115
62
6-6 · #114
56
DAV -1.5 139.5 JOES -0.6 JOES +2.1 144.7 Over 5.2 52% JOES L L ›
Final
0-9 · #322
73
1-9 · #309
84
SOU -6.5 153.5 SOU -7.8 SOU +1.3 160.0 Over 6.5 75% SOU W W ›
Final
5-8 · #155
62
6-7 · #165
48
TOW -8.5 136.5 TOW -7.9 MONM +0.6 135.5 Under 1.0 76% TOW W W ›
Final
7-4 · #219
79
4-6 · #273
88
UNCO -1.5 161.5 UNCO -0.7 MONT +0.8 162.5 Over 1.0 52% UNCO W W ›
Final
4-5 · #274
93
5-6 · #344
87
IDST -3.5 142.5 IDST -3.1 PRST +0.4 145.3 Over 2.8 61% IDST W W ›
Final
8-5 · #53
101
8-4 · #11
98
TEX -9.5 157.5 TEX -7.5 MSST +2.0 161.2 Over 3.7 74% TEX W W ›
Final
8-5 · #77
100
5-8 · #141
104
WICH -5.5 140.5 WICH -5.8 WICH +0.3 140.5 — 70% WICH L ›
Final
2-10 · #302
89
0-13 · #366
69
ALST -13.5 144.5 ALST -11.3 MVSU +2.2 150.4 Over 5.9 84% ALST L W ›
Final
4-6 · #328
83
1-10 · #363
95
AAMU -1.5 149.5 AAMU -2.0 AAMU +0.5 153.0 Over 3.5 57% AAMU L W ›
Final
10-3 · #4
73
9-4 · #78
65
ILL -14.5 156.5 ILL -14.7 ILL +0.2 158.2 Over 1.7 90% ILL L L ›
Final
10-3 · #96
66
5-7 · #174
65
NEV -4.5 146.5 NEV -6.9 NEV +2.4 147.6 Over 1.1 73% NEV L L ›
Final
6-7 · #159
45
11-2 · #120
49
UNCW -12.5 140.5 UNCW -10.5 HAMP +2.0 141.2 Over 0.7 82% UNCW W L ›
Final
8-5 · #149
86
4-9 · #312
64
UCI -3.5 160.5 UCI -3.7 UCI +0.2 153.9 Under 6.6 63% UCI W W ›
Final
12-1 · #23
89
9-4 · #41
73
PUR -5.5 153.5 PUR -9.2 PUR +3.7 155.2 Over 1.7 79% PUR W W ›
Final
9-3 · #122
58
9-3 · #82
78
UNM -7.5 151.5 UNM -6.5 WYO +1.0 151.8 Over 0.3 71% UNM L L ›
Final
8-4 · #87
70
8-4 · #80
60
GCU -6.5 143.5 GCU -3.4 CSU +3.1 144.1 Over 0.6 62% GCU W L ›
Final
0-12 · #335
73
3-9 · #279
66
OMA -8.5 148.5 OMA -7.8 KC +0.7 148.5 — 75% OMA W ›
Final
3-8 · #321
68
4-7 · #162
77
MTST -10.5 143.5 MTST -10.2 NAU +0.3 140.3 Under 3.2 81% MTST W L ›
Final
9-4 · #1
74
10-3 · #54
76
FLA -7.5 154.5 FLA -10.1 FLA +2.6 158.0 Over 3.5 81% FLA L L ›
Final
7-5 · #257
86
1-10 · #267
77
UTA -5.5 138.5 UTA -6.0 UTA +0.5 140.4 Over 1.9 70% UTA W W ›
Final
4-9 · #164
66
2-10 · #297
74
LBSU -2.5 162.5 LBSU -1.1 CP +1.4 164.7 Over 2.2 54% LBSU L L ›
Final
1-9 · #196
82
4-8 · #313
95
WEB -6.5 168.5 WEB -5.8 SAC +0.8 160.7 Under 7.8 69% WEB L L ›
Final
8-3 · #86
107
7-4 · #75
110
SDSU -4.5 138.5 SDSU -1.2 BOIS +3.3 140.0 Over 1.5 54% SDSU W W ›
Final
9-2 · #140
73
9-3 · #123
83
UCSD -2.5 148.5 UCSD -2.1 HAW +0.4 143.0 Under 5.5 57% UCSD L L ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record