Kathleen and Tom Elam Center · at UT Martin · Conference game
Closing line
UTM -10.5✓ EIU covered by 6.5
Closing total133.5Under by 7.5
| This season | UTM | |
|---|---|---|
| 2-9 | Record | 7-4 |
| 7-4 | ATS | 6-5 |
| 5-6 | O/U | 4-7 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: EIU 64–72 UTM · ✓ UTM (77%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EIU | 41 | 20 | 61 |
| UTM | 34 | 31 | 65 |
1st half: EIU 41, UTM 34 (EIU by 7). The model had UTM by 5.0 and a total of 63.6 (actual 75).
Team stats
| EIU | UTM | |
|---|---|---|
| 20-57 35% | Field goals | 18-48 38% |
| 6-24 25% | 3-pointers | 7-29 24% |
| 15-23 65% | Free throws | 22-26 85% |
| 34 13 off | Rebounds | 41 11 off |
| 13 | Assists | 10 |
| 14 | Steals | 7 |
| 4 | Blocks | 9 |
| 12 | Turnovers | 18 |
| 21 | Fouls | 16 |
| 18 | Points in paint | 20 |
| 19 | Fast-break points | 13 |
Players
| EIU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meechie White G | 33 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 4-10 | 2-4 |
| Terry McMorris F | 33 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| Andre Washington G | 21 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1-7 | 1-6 |
| Preston Turner G | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Nazareth Fisher F | 6 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Kooper Jacobi F | 35 | 16 | 7 | 1 | 6-14 | 2-7 |
| Zion Fruster G | 30 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 7-15 | 1-4 |
| Malik Olafioye G | 20 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-1 |
| Prince Johnson F | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Markus Blackwell G | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Kyle Layton, Shane Sims, Andrew Austin, JT Elder
| UTM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrija Bukumirovic F | 32 | 7 | 14 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-1 |
| Matas Deniusas F | 31 | 19 | 9 | 1 | 6-14 | 3-9 |
| Pedro Santos G | 27 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 4-9 | 1-4 |
| Filip Radakovic G | 26 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0-5 | 0-2 |
| Luca Colceag F | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Afan Trnka G | 27 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 3-6 | 2-5 |
| Ty Price G | 13 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-4 |
| Damien King G | 11 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Lamine Niang C | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Vladimir Khryapa F | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| AJ Hopkins F | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Will Hopkins, Filip Petkovski, Ama Sow, Charlie King, James Bass, Enrique Moya, Dragos Lungu, Lucas Williams
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUTM -9.5
1 → UTM
CloseUTM -10.5
1 pt toward UTM
Total
Open134.5
▼ 1
Close133.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
EIU +455 · UTM -625
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UTM -9.5 · closed UTM -10.5 · moved 1 toward UTMmodel UTM -8.5
model UTM -8.5
Opened 134.5 · closed 133.5 · moved 1 downmodel 135.5
model 135.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | UTM -10.5 | UTM -8.5 | EIU +2.0 | W EIU covered |
| Total | 133.5 | 135.6 | Over 2.1 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | EIU 63.6 · UTM 72.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UTM -5.0 | EIU -7.0 |
| 1H total | 63.6 | 75 |
| 1H projected score | EIU 29.3 · UTM 34.3 | EIU 41 · UTM 34 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 8 since 2021-22
EIU 4–4 UTMSeries tied · 8 games since 2021-22 · UTM has won the last 3 meetings · EIU 5-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2024-25 | UTM 72 @ EIU 68 | EIU +2.5 | UTM W |
| Jan 16, 2024-25 | EIU 63 @ UTM 68 | UTM -5.5 | EIU W |
| Feb 1, 2023-24 | UTM 76 @ EIU 59 | EIU -0.5 | UTM W |
| Jan 4, 2023-24 | EIU 79 @ UTM 72 | UTM -9.5 | EIU W |
| Feb 9, 2022-23 | UTM 75 @ EIU 77 | EIU +4.5 | EIU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
E Illinois
11 games played
Straight up
2-9
18% wins
Against the spread
7-4
64% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
5-6
45% overs · avg −3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 63-66 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 65-57 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 58-78 | +23.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 53-99 | +35.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 60-81 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 62-109 | +40.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 74-82 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 59-68 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 53-78 | +43.5 | W +18.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 76-72 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 134.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 59-68 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
VAL
L 63-66
+2.5
7
vs
NICH
W 65-57
+10.5
11
@
ND
L 58-78
+3.5
14
@
UK
L 53-99
−10.5
25
@
CARK
L 60-81
−15.5
28
@
PUR
L 62-109
−6.5
6
vs
LIN
L 74-82
+0.5
10
vs
EKU
L 59-68
−2.5
14
@
ISU
L 53-78
+18.5
18
vs
SIUE
W 76-72
+10.5
1
@
SEMO
L 59-68
+3.5
covered 7didn’t cover 4avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
VAL
L 63-66
−15.5
7
vs
NICH
W 65-57
−13.5
11
@
ND
L 58-78
−7.5
14
@
UK
L 53-99
+4.5
25
@
CARK
L 60-81
+1.5
28
@
PUR
L 62-109
+29.5
6
vs
LIN
L 74-82
+10.5
10
vs
EKU
L 59-68
−22.5
14
@
ISU
L 53-78
−13.5
18
vs
SIUE
W 76-72
+13.5
1
@
SEMO
L 59-68
−19.5
over 5under 6avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
UT Martin
11 games played
Straight up
7-4
64% wins
Against the spread
6-5
55% covers · avg +3.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
4-7
36% overs · avg −5.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | W 86-81 | +16.5 | W +21.5 | 146.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 12 | @ | W 78-67 | +15.5 | W +26.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 73-87 | +19.5 | W +5.5 | 165.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 69-68 | -10.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 60-70 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 73-56 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 74-64 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 54-83 | +8.5 | L −20.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 71-78 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 86-62 | -2.5 | W +21.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 67-60 | -13.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 127 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
UNLV
W 86-81
+21.5
12
@
BRAD
W 78-67
+26.5
18
@
FSU
L 73-87
+5.5
22
vs
PV
W 69-68
−9.5
23
vs
USM
L 60-70
−11.5
2
vs
CHSO
W 73-56
+13.5
7
vs
ALST
W 74-64
+3.5
10
@
SIU
L 54-83
−20.5
18
@
TNST
L 71-78
−4.5
20
@
TNTC
W 86-62
+21.5
1
vs
WIU
W 67-60
−6.5
covered 6didn’t cover 5avg +3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
UNLV
W 86-81
+20.5
12
@
BRAD
W 78-67
+0.5
18
@
FSU
L 73-87
−5.5
22
vs
PV
W 69-68
−18.5
23
vs
USM
L 60-70
−16.5
2
vs
CHSO
W 73-56
−18.5
7
vs
ALST
W 74-64
−6.5
10
@
SIU
L 54-83
−9.5
18
@
TNST
L 71-78
+7.5
20
@
TNTC
W 86-62
+2.5
1
vs
WIU
W 67-60
−13.5
over 4under 7avg −5.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
E Illinois
2-9 overall · 1-2 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ SE Missouri59–68
- Wvs SIUE76–72
- L@ Iowa State53–78
- Lvs E Kentucky59–68
- Lvs Lindenwood Lions74–82
2 days since their last game.
UT Martin
7-4 overall · 2-1 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs W Illinois67–60
- W@ Tennessee Tech86–62
- L@ Tennessee St71–78
- L@ S Illinois54–83
- Wvs Alabama St74–64
2 days since their last game.