Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
11-2 · #20 AP #21
40
10-4 · #48
20
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
36–38
✗ NCSU lost
Half finalConference
9-4 · #19
34
10-3 · #15 AP #14
50
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.7
Projected
39–43
✓ ALA won
Half finalConference
VCU
10-4 · #61
46
7-5 · #107
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.5
Projected
40–37
✓ VCU won
Half finalConference
UTSA
2-9 · #192
30
Temple
8-5 · #111
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
32–39
✓ TEM won
Half finalConference
11-2 · #32
30
Butler
10-4 · #72
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
35–36
✓ BTLR won
Half finalConference
7-6 · #52
31
9-4 · #9
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.8
Projected
36–44
✓ SJU won
Half finalConference
12-2 · #68
32
9-5 · #89
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
36–38
✓ WAKE won
Half finalConference
11-3 · #35
34
Pitt
7-7 · #74
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
34–32
✗ CLEM lost
Half finalConference
5-8 · #229
36
5-8 · #243
49
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
36–37
✓ CAM won
Half finalConference
12-1 · #45
38
10-3 · #12 AP #15
46
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.3
Projected
36–42
✓ TTU won
Half finalConference
Auburn
9-4 · #21
42
12-1 · #34 AP #23
47
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.9
Projected
40–42
✓ UGA won
Half finalConference
5-7 · #211
35
Army
5-7 · #288
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
38–34
✓ COLG won
Half finalConference
6-6 · #153
38
4-9 · #261
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
34–35
✗ BU lost
Half finalConference
3-8 · #334
26
8-3 · #151
47
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.1
Projected
33–42
✓ KENT won
Half finalConference
6-7 · #186
39
2-9 · #286
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
36–32
✓ UVM won
Half finalConference
3-8 · #227
23
VMI
2-9 · #320
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
37–34
✗ UTC lost
Half finalConference
7-5 · #248
42
0-11 · #339
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
36–31
✓ WOF won
Half finalConference
6-7 · #224
33
3-12 · #221
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.7
Projected
33–30
✓ USM won
Half finalConference
2-11 · #208
25
7-7 · #283
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
32–36
✓ CCU won
Half finalConference
BYU
12-1 · #24 AP #10
45
9-4 · #83
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.7
Projected
42–36
✓ BYU won
Half finalConference
12-1 · #2 AP #8
28
8-5 · #30
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.0
Projected
34–29
✗ HOU lost
Half finalConference
13-0 · #22 AP #11
42
9-4 · #79
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
40–35
✓ VAN won
Half finalConference
Kansas
10-3 · #16 AP #17
41
UCF
11-1 · #39
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
38–35
✗ KU lost
Half finalConference
3-10 · #124
31
9-4 · #101
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
31–40
✓ GW won
Half finalConference
Dayton
10-4 · #91
31
5-9 · #113
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
37–31
✗ DAY lost
Half finalConference
Baylor
9-2 · #29
23
TCU
10-3 · #40
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
37–37
✗ BAY lost
Half finalConference
5-8 · #325
30
4-8 · #183
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
32–33
✓ PRES won
Half finalConference
3-9 · #271
29
7-6 · #326
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
35–36
✓ CHSO won
Half finalConference
6-7 · #218
40
10-3 · #90
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.9
Projected
34–43
✓ HPU won
Half finalConference
Xavier
9-5 · #49
37
DePaul
8-6 · #66
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
34–35
✓ DEP won
Half finalConference
Navy
7-5 · #199
28
4-8 · #317
21
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
34–31
✓ NAVY won
Half finalConference
5-8 · #201
45
4-10 · #336
50
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
37–33
✗ SDST lost
Half finalConference
Ohio
5-7 · #128
15
6-7 · #188
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–35
✗ OHIO lost
Half finalConference
7-4 · #200
34
UMass
8-5 · #209
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
36–35
 
Half finalConference
2-9 · #181
25
10-2 · #237
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
32–36
✓ BUF won
Half finalConference
NJIT
4-10 · #316
34
1-11 · #272
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
34–34
✓ BING won
Half finalConference
Bryant
2-10 · #290
26
Maine
1-13 · #323
17
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.2
Projected
31–29
✓ BRY won
Half finalConference
1-11 · #301
28
2-10 · #307
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
35–37
✓ UML won
Half finalConference
8-4 · #166
40
Drexel
5-9 · #262
25
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.7
Projected
34–30
✓ HOF won
Half finalConference
3-9 · #303
28
4-8 · #240
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
32–37
✓ CARK won
Half finalConference
2-10 · #294
37
5-6 · #298
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.9
Projected
37–37
✓ EKU won
Half finalConference
7-6 · #95
24
9-5 · #94
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
33–35
✓ GT won
Half finalConference
13-1 · #44 AP #12
39
SMU
11-2 · #55
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
37–37
 
Half finalConference
6-7 · #76
31
Rice
4-8 · #177
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
37–31
✗ MEM lost
Half finalConference
Toledo
5-6 · #157
31
2-10 · #270
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
39–35
✗ TOL lost
Half finalConference
6-7 · #158
39
8-4 · #171
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.4
Projected
35–41
✗ ARST lost
Half finalConference
FGCU
4-8 · #266
33
3-7 · #292
23
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
37–36
✓ FGCU won
Half finalConference
3-8 · #295
40
50
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.2
Projected
38–41
✓ QUC won
Half finalConference
10-3 · #7 AP #19
36
10-3 · #18 AP #18
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
37–37
✗ TENN lost
Half finalConference
1-8 · #327
36
2-10 · #202
48
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
32–37
✓ BCU won
Half finalConference
Akron
8-3 · #118
36
11-0 · #125
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 82.5
Projected
43–40
✓ AKR won
Half finalConference
9-5 · #296
47
3-11 · #234
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
37–38
✗ ODU lost
Half finalConference
8-5 · #46
41
10-3 · #31
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
34–36
✓ OU won
Half finalConference
Duke
12-1 · #3 AP #6
42
7-7 · #81
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
42–33
 
Half finalConference
6-7 · #103
46
1-12 · #358
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
38–34
✓ TXST won
Half finalConference
13-0 · #5 AP #1
58
Utah
8-5 · #73
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
43–32
✓ ARIZ won
Half finalConference
9-5 · #105
26
12-1 · #93
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
31–35
✓ GMU won
Half finalConference
4-8 · #143
51
10-1 · #58
48
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
30–41
✗ USU lost
Half finalConference
0-13 · #348
50
5-8 · #205
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.8
Projected
32–45
✗ WIN lost
Half finalConference
7-5 · #134
26
6-7 · #194
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
37–38
✓ CSUN won
Half finalConference
2-11 · #305
37
8-5 · #213
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
31–39
✗ NDSU lost
Half finalConference
NC A&T
5-6 · #275
39
6-7 · #191
50
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
33–35
✓ STBK won
Half finalConference
6-6 · #184
35
3-9 · #284
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
36–35
✗ SAM lost
Half finalConference
2-8 · #215
38
Furman
7-4 · #152
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
33–38
✗ FUR lost
Half finalConference
Mercer
5-6 · #242
35
ETSU
7-5 · #173
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
33–37
✗ ETSU lost
Half finalConference
7-6 · #259
32
8-5 · #231
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
31–35
✓ MRSH won
Half finalConference
LSU
12-1 · #51
34
10-3 · #28
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.3
Projected
40–41
✓ TA&M won
Half finalConference
9-3 · #150
36
5-6 · #253
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
35–31
✗ UVU lost
Half finalConference
Howard
6-6 · #197
20
0-14 · #353
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
37–33
✗ HOW lost
Half finalConference
3-10 · #319
31
0-11 · #357
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
34–32
✗ NORF lost
Half finalConference
1-11 · #360
37
1-12 · #280
53
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
35–37
✓ JKST won
Half finalConference
1-11 · #345
30
2-13 · #364
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
32–36
✓ UMES won
Half finalConference
1-15 · #352
27
2-9 · #351
24
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.7
Projected
30–36
✗ DSU lost
Half finalConference
9-2 · #193
37
3-9 · #252
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.9
Projected
33–31
✓ SFA won
Half finalConference
4-9 · #276
43
1-10 · #318
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
36–36
✓ NOLA won
Half finalConference
4-8 · #342
25
4-8 · #285
31
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
32–37
✓ NICH won
Half finalConference
9-4 · #228
23
Troy
7-5 · #147
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
34–39
✓ TROY won
Half finalConference
3-8 · #350
33
SIUE
6-5 · #256
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.5
Projected
31–34
✓ SIUE won
Half finalConference
5-5 · #245
33
3-9 · #222
32
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
35–33
✓ TNST won
Half finalConference
45
6-5 · #258
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
31–38
✗ LIN lost
Half finalConference
2-9 · #361
41
7-4 · #341
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.6
Projected
29–34
✗ UTM lost
Half finalConference
1-10 · #365
27
4-7 · #306
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
31–39
✓ SEMO won
Half finalConference
Lehigh
2-10 · #216
36
3-11 · #299
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
32–34
✗ BUCK lost
Half finalConference
8-5 · #70
34
8-5 · #59
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
31–34
 
Half finalConference
3-10 · #220
20
UNLV
5-6 · #98
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
30–39
✓ UNLV won
Half finalConference
3-8 · #300
32
4-6 · #289
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
32–36
✓ UIW won
Half finalConference
2-11 · #310
45
2-10 · #314
25
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
35–36
✗ L-MD lost
Half finalConference
4-9 · #329
40
6-5 · #182
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
32–39
✗ UCD lost
Half finalConference
1-11 · #254
37
Idaho
5-5 · #247
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
35–39
 
Half finalConference
0-12 · #333
35
6-6 · #214
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.6
Projected
34–44
✓ LIP won
Half finalConference
3-9 · #223
38
5-5 · #210
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
30–36
✓ APSU won
Half finalConference
10-5 · #203
28
6-5 · #185
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
34–35
✓ TAR won
Half finalConference
10-3 · #65
48
9-4 · #60
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
37–38
✗ ASU lost
Half finalConference
1-8 · #343
30
4-7 · #338
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
34–38
✓ GRAM won
Half finalConference
2-7 · #238
28
3-8 · #287
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
33–33
 
Half finalConference
UCLA
10-3 · #26
22
Iowa
11-2 · #43 AP #25
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
33–35
✓ IOWA won
Half finalConference
7-5 · #115
20
6-6 · #114
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
34–34
✓ JOES won
Half finalConference
0-9 · #322
29
1-9 · #309
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.9
Projected
35–40
✓ SOU won
Half finalConference
5-8 · #155
25
Towson
6-7 · #165
22
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.5
Projected
29–34
✗ TOW lost
Half finalConference
7-4 · #219
25
4-6 · #273
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.1
Projected
38–38
✗ UNCO lost
Half finalConference
4-5 · #274
29
5-6 · #344
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
33–35
✓ IDST won
Half finalConference
8-5 · #53
48
Texas
8-4 · #11
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
36–40
✗ TEX lost
Half finalConference
8-5 · #77
41
5-8 · #141
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
35–31
✓ WICH won
Half finalConference
2-10 · #302
41
0-13 · #366
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
39–32
✓ ALST won
Half finalConference
4-6 · #328
41
1-10 · #363
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
37–35
 
Half finalConference
10-3 · #4 AP #20
40
9-4 · #78
26
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
42–33
✓ ILL won
Half finalConference
Nevada
10-3 · #96
21
5-7 · #174
26
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
37–32
✗ NEV lost
Half finalConference
6-7 · #159
18
11-2 · #120
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
30–36
✓ UNCW won
Half finalConference
8-5 · #149
47
4-9 · #312
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
37–35
✓ UCI won
Half finalConference
Purdue
12-1 · #23 AP #5
45
9-4 · #41
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
39–34
✓ PUR won
Half finalConference
9-3 · #122
31
9-3 · #82
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
34–37
✓ UNM won
Half finalConference
8-4 · #87
35
8-4 · #80
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
33–35
✗ GCU lost
Half finalConference
0-12 · #335
32
Omaha
3-9 · #279
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
33–37
✗ OMA lost
Half finalConference
3-8 · #321
35
4-7 · #162
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.7
Projected
30–36
✓ MTST won
Half finalConference
9-4 · #1 AP #22
39
10-3 · #54
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
40–34
 
Half finalConference
7-5 · #257
37
1-10 · #267
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
35–31
✗ UTA lost
Half finalConference
4-9 · #164
26
2-10 · #297
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.1
Projected
38–39
✓ LBSU won
Half finalConference
1-9 · #196
39
4-8 · #313
50
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.2
Projected
36–39
✓ WEB won
Half finalConference
8-3 · #86
29
7-4 · #75
50
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.6
Projected
33–33
✓ SDSU won
Half finalConference
9-2 · #140
29
9-3 · #123
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
33–34
✓ UCSD won
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Half final
11-2 · #20
40
10-4 · #48
20
— — NCSU -2.5 — 73.8 — 61% NCSU ›
Half final
9-4 · #19
34
10-3 · #15
50
— — ALA -3.3 — 81.7 — 64% ALA ›
Half final
10-4 · #61
46
7-5 · #107
34
— — VCU -3.3 — 76.5 — 64% VCU ›
Half final
2-9 · #192
30
8-5 · #111
39
— — TEM -7.0 — 71.5 — 78% TEM ›
Half final
11-2 · #32
30
10-4 · #72
33
— — BTLR -0.5 — 71.1 — 52% BTLR ›
Half final
7-6 · #52
31
9-4 · #9
38
— — SJU -8.3 — 79.8 — 82% SJU ›
Half final
12-2 · #68
32
9-5 · #89
36
— — WAKE -2.8 — 74.0 — 62% WAKE ›
Half final
11-3 · #35
34
7-7 · #74
35
— — CLEM -2.0 — 65.3 — 59% CLEM ›
Half final
5-8 · #229
36
5-8 · #243
49
— — CAM -1.6 — 72.8 — 57% CAM ›
Half final
12-1 · #45
38
10-3 · #12
46
— — TTU -5.7 — 77.3 — 73% TTU ›
Half final
9-4 · #21
42
12-1 · #34
47
— — UGA -2.2 — 81.9 — 59% UGA ›
Half final
5-7 · #211
35
5-7 · #288
34
— — COLG -3.4 — 72.3 — 65% COLG ›
Half final
6-6 · #153
38
4-9 · #261
32
— — BU -1.0 — 69.8 — 54% BU ›
Half final
3-8 · #334
26
8-3 · #151
47
— — KENT -9.2 — 75.1 — 84% KENT ›
Half final
6-7 · #186
39
2-9 · #286
31
— — UVM -4.5 — 67.5 — 69% UVM ›
Half final
3-8 · #227
23
2-9 · #320
39
— — UTC -3.1 — 70.4 — 63% UTC ›
Half final
7-5 · #248
42
0-11 · #339
35
— — WOF -5.1 — 67.1 — 71% WOF ›
Half final
6-7 · #224
33
3-12 · #221
27
— — USM -3.0 — 62.7 — 63% USM ›
Half final
2-11 · #208
25
7-7 · #283
34
— — CCU -3.4 — 67.9 — 64% CCU ›
Half final
12-1 · #24
45
9-4 · #83
35
— — BYU -5.5 — 77.7 — 73% BYU ›
Half final
12-1 · #2
28
8-5 · #30
33
— — HOU -5.0 — 62.0 — 71% HOU ›
Half final
13-0 · #22
42
9-4 · #79
34
— — VAN -5.6 — 74.8 — 73% VAN ›
Half final
10-3 · #16
41
11-1 · #39
44
— — KU -2.2 — 72.8 — 60% KU ›
Half final
3-10 · #124
31
9-4 · #101
36
— — GW -8.6 — 71.3 — 83% GW ›
Half final
10-4 · #91
31
5-9 · #113
39
— — DAY -6.6 — 68.0 — 76% DAY ›
Half final
9-2 · #29
23
10-3 · #40
29
— — BAY -0.4 — 74.5 — 52% BAY ›
Half final
5-8 · #325
30
4-8 · #183
31
— — PRES -1.2 — 65.0 — 55% PRES ›
Half final
3-9 · #271
29
7-6 · #326
38
— — CHSO -1.7 — 70.7 — 57% CHSO ›
Half final
6-7 · #218
40
10-3 · #90
42
— — HPU -9.3 — 76.9 — 85% HPU ›
Half final
9-5 · #49
37
8-6 · #66
40
— — DEP -1.1 — 69.5 — 55% DEP ›
Half final
7-5 · #199
28
4-8 · #317
21
— — NAVY -2.8 — 65.5 — 62% NAVY ›
Half final
5-8 · #201
45
4-10 · #336
50
— — SDST -4.0 — 70.7 — 67% SDST ›
Half final
5-7 · #128
15
6-7 · #188
32
— — OHIO -0.4 — 70.3 — 52% OHIO ›
Half final
7-4 · #200
34
8-5 · #209
34
— — BGSU -0.7 — 70.5 — 53% BGSU ›
Half final
2-9 · #181
25
10-2 · #237
41
— — BUF -4.2 — 67.2 — 68% BUF ›
Half final
4-10 · #316
34
1-11 · #272
37
— — BING -0.6 — 67.8 — 52% BING ›
Half final
2-10 · #290
26
1-13 · #323
17
— — BRY -1.3 — 60.2 — 56% BRY ›
Half final
1-11 · #301
28
2-10 · #307
36
— — UML -2.0 — 72.7 — 58% UML ›
Half final
8-4 · #166
40
5-9 · #262
25
— — HOF -4.4 — 63.7 — 69% HOF ›
Half final
3-9 · #303
28
4-8 · #240
41
— — CARK -5.9 — 68.8 — 74% CARK ›
Half final
2-10 · #294
37
5-6 · #298
33
— — EKU -0.3 — 73.9 — 51% EKU ›
Half final
7-6 · #95
24
9-5 · #94
27
— — GT -2.6 — 68.0 — 61% GT ›
Half final
13-1 · #44
39
11-2 · #55
39
— — SMU -0.2 — 73.8 — 51% SMU ›
Half final
6-7 · #76
31
4-8 · #177
32
— — MEM -6.4 — 68.3 — 76% MEM ›
Half final
5-6 · #157
31
2-10 · #270
41
— — TOL -3.7 — 73.4 — 66% TOL ›
Half final
6-7 · #158
39
8-4 · #171
34
— — ARST -5.5 — 76.4 — 73% ARST ›
Half final
4-8 · #266
33
3-7 · #292
23
— — FGCU -0.3 — 72.8 — 51% FGCU ›
Half final
3-8 · #295
40
— — QUC -2.5 — 79.2 — 61% QUC ›
Half final
10-3 · #7
36
10-3 · #18
37
— — TENN -0.1 — 73.8 — 51% TENN ›
Half final
1-8 · #327
36
2-10 · #202
48
— — BCU -5.2 — 69.5 — 71% BCU ›
Half final
8-3 · #118
36
11-0 · #125
33
— — AKR -3.0 — 82.5 — 63% AKR ›
Half final
9-5 · #296
47
3-11 · #234
30
— — ODU -0.8 — 75.5 — 54% ODU ›
Half final
8-5 · #46
41
10-3 · #31
43
— — OU -2.3 — 70.3 — 60% OU ›
Half final
12-1 · #3
42
7-7 · #81
42
— — DUKE -8.8 — 74.5 — 83% DUKE ›
Half final
6-7 · #103
46
1-12 · #358
40
— — TXST -4.0 — 71.5 — 67% TXST ›
Half final
13-0 · #5
58
8-5 · #73
39
— — ARIZ -11.0 — 75.5 — 88% ARIZ ›
Half final
9-5 · #105
26
12-1 · #93
31
— — GMU -3.4 — 66.0 — 64% GMU ›
Half final
4-8 · #143
51
10-1 · #58
48
— — USU -11.0 — 70.2 — 88% USU ›
Half final
0-13 · #348
50
5-8 · #205
37
— — WIN -12.2 — 76.8 — 91% WIN ›
Half final
7-5 · #134
26
6-7 · #194
34
— — CSUN -0.2 — 74.8 — 51% CSUN ›
Half final
2-11 · #305
37
8-5 · #213
32
— — NDSU -7.6 — 70.0 — 80% NDSU ›
Half final
5-6 · #275
39
6-7 · #191
50
— — STBK -2.3 — 67.2 — 60% STBK ›
Half final
6-6 · #184
35
3-9 · #284
43
— — SAM -0.8 — 70.8 — 54% SAM ›
Half final
2-8 · #215
38
7-4 · #152
30
— — FUR -5.2 — 71.4 — 72% FUR ›
Half final
5-6 · #242
35
7-5 · #173
32
— — ETSU -3.9 — 69.7 — 67% ETSU ›
Half final
7-6 · #259
32
8-5 · #231
44
— — MRSH -3.4 — 66.1 — 64% MRSH ›
Half final
12-1 · #51
34
10-3 · #28
37
— — TA&M -1.0 — 80.3 — 54% TA&M ›
Half final
9-3 · #150
36
5-6 · #253
41
— — UVU -4.5 — 66.1 — 69% UVU ›
Half final
6-6 · #197
20
0-14 · #353
30
— — HOW -4.0 — 69.2 — 67% HOW ›
Half final
3-10 · #319
31
0-11 · #357
38
— — NORF -1.5 — 66.2 — 56% NORF ›
Half final
1-11 · #360
37
1-12 · #280
53
— — JKST -2.3 — 71.4 — 60% JKST ›
Half final
1-11 · #345
30
2-13 · #364
38
— — UMES -4.0 — 67.3 — 67% UMES ›
Half final
1-15 · #352
27
2-9 · #351
24
— — DSU -6.3 — 65.7 — 75% DSU ›
Half final
9-2 · #193
37
3-9 · #252
31
— — SFA -1.9 — 63.9 — 58% SFA ›
Half final
4-9 · #276
43
1-10 · #318
34
— — NOLA -0.6 — 72.1 — 53% NOLA ›
Half final
4-8 · #342
25
4-8 · #285
31
— — NICH -4.7 — 68.9 — 70% NICH ›
Half final
9-4 · #228
23
7-5 · #147
30
— — TROY -4.4 — 72.7 — 68% TROY ›
Half final
3-8 · #350
33
6-5 · #256
35
— — SIUE -2.8 — 64.5 — 62% SIUE ›
Half final
5-5 · #245
33
3-9 · #222
32
— — TNST -1.4 — 67.8 — 56% TNST ›
Half final
6-5 · #258
43
— — LIN -6.4 — 69.0 — 76% LIN ›
Half final
2-9 · #361
41
7-4 · #341
34
— — UTM -5.0 — 63.6 — 71% UTM ›
Half final
1-10 · #365
27
4-7 · #306
34
— — SEMO -7.4 — 69.5 — 79% SEMO ›
Half final
2-10 · #216
36
3-11 · #299
28
— — BUCK -2.0 — 66.2 — 58% BUCK ›
Half final
8-5 · #70
34
8-5 · #59
34
— — NU -3.6 — 65.0 — 65% NU ›
Half final
3-10 · #220
20
5-6 · #98
35
— — UNLV -8.7 — 69.0 — 83% UNLV ›
Half final
3-8 · #300
32
4-6 · #289
36
— — UIW -4.2 — 67.7 — 68% UIW ›
Half final
2-11 · #310
45
2-10 · #314
25
— — L-MD -0.8 — 70.4 — 54% L-MD ›
Half final
4-9 · #329
40
6-5 · #182
39
— — UCD -6.5 — 71.4 — 76% UCD ›
Half final
1-11 · #254
37
5-5 · #247
37
— — IDHO -3.7 — 74.1 — 66% IDHO ›
Half final
0-12 · #333
35
6-6 · #214
38
— — LIP -9.7 — 77.6 — 86% LIP ›
Half final
3-9 · #223
38
5-5 · #210
43
— — APSU -5.5 — 66.2 — 72% APSU ›
Half final
10-5 · #203
28
6-5 · #185
29
— — TAR -0.7 — 68.3 — 53% TAR ›
Half final
10-3 · #65
48
9-4 · #60
38
— — ASU -1.3 — 75.3 — 56% ASU ›
Half final
1-8 · #343
30
4-7 · #338
37
— — GRAM -3.9 — 71.6 — 67% GRAM ›
Half final
2-7 · #238
28
3-8 · #287
28
— — RGV -0.4 — 65.3 — 52% RGV ›
Half final
10-3 · #26
22
11-2 · #43
40
— — IOWA -2.4 — 67.5 — 60% IOWA ›
Half final
7-5 · #115
20
6-6 · #114
29
— — JOES -0.3 — 67.8 — 51% JOES ›
Half final
0-9 · #322
29
1-9 · #309
42
— — SOU -4.6 — 74.9 — 69% SOU ›
Half final
5-8 · #155
25
6-7 · #165
22
— — TOW -4.6 — 63.5 — 69% TOW ›
Half final
7-4 · #219
25
4-6 · #273
34
— — UNCO -0.6 — 76.1 — 52% UNCO ›
Half final
4-5 · #274
29
5-6 · #344
36
— — IDST -1.7 — 68.0 — 57% IDST ›
Half final
8-5 · #53
48
8-4 · #11
43
— — TEX -4.4 — 75.5 — 68% TEX ›
Half final
8-5 · #77
41
5-8 · #141
36
— — WICH -3.6 — 65.8 — 65% WICH ›
Half final
2-10 · #302
41
0-13 · #366
38
— — ALST -6.9 — 70.5 — 77% ALST ›
Half final
4-6 · #328
41
1-10 · #363
41
— — AAMU -1.4 — 71.7 — 56% AAMU ›
Half final
10-3 · #4
40
9-4 · #78
26
— — ILL -8.9 — 74.1 — 83% ILL ›
Half final
10-3 · #96
21
5-7 · #174
26
— — NEV -4.3 — 69.1 — 68% NEV ›
Half final
6-7 · #159
18
11-2 · #120
27
— — UNCW -6.2 — 66.2 — 75% UNCW ›
Half final
8-5 · #149
47
4-9 · #312
37
— — UCI -2.3 — 72.1 — 60% UCI ›
Half final
12-1 · #23
45
9-4 · #41
38
— — PUR -5.6 — 72.7 — 73% PUR ›
Half final
9-3 · #122
31
9-3 · #82
34
— — UNM -3.7 — 71.1 — 66% UNM ›
Half final
8-4 · #87
35
8-4 · #80
29
— — GCU -1.9 — 67.5 — 58% GCU ›
Half final
0-12 · #335
32
3-9 · #279
28
— — OMA -4.5 — 69.6 — 69% OMA ›
Half final
3-8 · #321
35
4-7 · #162
43
— — MTST -6.0 — 65.7 — 74% MTST ›
Half final
9-4 · #1
39
10-3 · #54
39
— — FLA -6.1 — 74.0 — 75% FLA ›
Half final
7-5 · #257
37
1-10 · #267
41
— — UTA -3.7 — 65.8 — 66% UTA ›
Half final
4-9 · #164
26
2-10 · #297
38
— — LBSU -0.5 — 77.1 — 52% LBSU ›
Half final
1-9 · #196
39
4-8 · #313
50
— — WEB -3.3 — 75.2 — 64% WEB ›
Half final
8-3 · #86
29
7-4 · #75
50
— — SDSU -0.6 — 65.6 — 53% SDSU ›
Half final
9-2 · #140
29
9-3 · #123
36
— — UCSD -1.1 — 67.0 — 55% UCSD ›
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record