No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
36–38
✗ NCSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.7
Projected
39–43
✓ ALA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.5
Projected
40–37
✓ VCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
32–39
✓ TEM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
35–36
✓ BTLR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.8
Projected
36–44
✓ SJU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
36–38
✓ WAKE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
34–32
✗ CLEM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
36–37
✓ CAM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.3
Projected
36–42
✓ TTU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.9
Projected
40–42
✓ UGA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
38–34
✓ COLG won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
34–35
✗ BU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.1
Projected
33–42
✓ KENT won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
36–32
✓ UVM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
37–34
✗ UTC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
36–31
✓ WOF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.7
Projected
33–30
✓ USM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
32–36
✓ CCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.7
Projected
42–36
✓ BYU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.0
Projected
34–29
✗ HOU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
40–35
✓ VAN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
38–35
✗ KU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
31–40
✓ GW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
37–31
✗ DAY lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
37–37
✗ BAY lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
32–33
✓ PRES won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
35–36
✓ CHSO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.9
Projected
34–43
✓ HPU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
34–35
✓ DEP won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
34–31
✓ NAVY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
37–33
✗ SDST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–35
✗ OHIO lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
36–35
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
32–36
✓ BUF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
34–34
✓ BING won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.2
Projected
31–29
✓ BRY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
35–37
✓ UML won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.7
Projected
34–30
✓ HOF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
32–37
✓ CARK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.9
Projected
37–37
✓ EKU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
33–35
✓ GT won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
37–37
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
37–31
✗ MEM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
39–35
✗ TOL lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.4
Projected
35–41
✗ ARST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
37–36
✓ FGCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.2
Projected
38–41
✓ QUC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
37–37
✗ TENN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
32–37
✓ BCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 82.5
Projected
43–40
✓ AKR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
37–38
✗ ODU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
34–36
✓ OU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
42–33
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
38–34
✓ TXST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
43–32
✓ ARIZ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
31–35
✓ GMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
30–41
✗ USU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.8
Projected
32–45
✗ WIN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
37–38
✓ CSUN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
31–39
✗ NDSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
33–35
✓ STBK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
36–35
✗ SAM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
33–38
✗ FUR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
33–37
✗ ETSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
31–35
✓ MRSH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.3
Projected
40–41
✓ TA&M won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
35–31
✗ UVU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
37–33
✗ HOW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
34–32
✗ NORF lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
35–37
✓ JKST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
32–36
✓ UMES won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.7
Projected
30–36
✗ DSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.9
Projected
33–31
✓ SFA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
36–36
✓ NOLA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
32–37
✓ NICH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
34–39
✓ TROY won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.5
Projected
31–34
✓ SIUE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
35–33
✓ TNST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
31–38
✗ LIN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.6
Projected
29–34
✗ UTM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
31–39
✓ SEMO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
32–34
✗ BUCK lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
31–34
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
30–39
✓ UNLV won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
32–36
✓ UIW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
35–36
✗ L-MD lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
32–39
✗ UCD lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
35–39
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.6
Projected
34–44
✓ LIP won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
30–36
✓ APSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
34–35
✓ TAR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
37–38
✗ ASU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
34–38
✓ GRAM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
33–33
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
33–35
✓ IOWA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
34–34
✓ JOES won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.9
Projected
35–40
✓ SOU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.5
Projected
29–34
✗ TOW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.1
Projected
38–38
✗ UNCO lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
33–35
✓ IDST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
36–40
✗ TEX lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
35–31
✓ WICH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
39–32
✓ ALST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
37–35
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
42–33
✓ ILL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
37–32
✗ NEV lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
30–36
✓ UNCW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
37–35
✓ UCI won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
39–34
✓ PUR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
34–37
✓ UNM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
33–35
✗ GCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
33–37
✗ OMA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.7
Projected
30–36
✓ MTST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
40–34
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
35–31
✗ UTA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.1
Projected
38–39
✓ LBSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.2
Projected
36–39
✓ WEB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.6
Projected
33–33
✓ SDSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.0
Projected
33–34
✓ UCSD won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 11-2 · #20 10-4 · #48 |
— | — | NCSU -2.5 | — | 73.8 | — | 61% NCSU | › | |
| Half final | 9-4 · #19 10-3 · #15 |
— | — | ALA -3.3 | — | 81.7 | — | 64% ALA | › | |
| Half final | 10-4 · #61 7-5 · #107 |
— | — | VCU -3.3 | — | 76.5 | — | 64% VCU | › | |
| Half final | 2-9 · #192 8-5 · #111 |
— | — | TEM -7.0 | — | 71.5 | — | 78% TEM | › | |
| Half final | 11-2 · #32 10-4 · #72 |
— | — | BTLR -0.5 | — | 71.1 | — | 52% BTLR | › | |
| Half final | 7-6 · #52 9-4 · #9 |
— | — | SJU -8.3 | — | 79.8 | — | 82% SJU | › | |
| Half final | 12-2 · #68 9-5 · #89 |
— | — | WAKE -2.8 | — | 74.0 | — | 62% WAKE | › | |
| Half final | 11-3 · #35 7-7 · #74 |
— | — | CLEM -2.0 | — | 65.3 | — | 59% CLEM | › | |
| Half final | 5-8 · #229 5-8 · #243 |
— | — | CAM -1.6 | — | 72.8 | — | 57% CAM | › | |
| Half final | 12-1 · #45 10-3 · #12 |
— | — | TTU -5.7 | — | 77.3 | — | 73% TTU | › | |
| Half final | 9-4 · #21 12-1 · #34 |
— | — | UGA -2.2 | — | 81.9 | — | 59% UGA | › | |
| Half final | 5-7 · #211 5-7 · #288 |
— | — | COLG -3.4 | — | 72.3 | — | 65% COLG | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #153 4-9 · #261 |
— | — | BU -1.0 | — | 69.8 | — | 54% BU | › | |
| Half final | 3-8 · #334 8-3 · #151 |
— | — | KENT -9.2 | — | 75.1 | — | 84% KENT | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #186 2-9 · #286 |
— | — | UVM -4.5 | — | 67.5 | — | 69% UVM | › | |
| Half final | 3-8 · #227 2-9 · #320 |
— | — | UTC -3.1 | — | 70.4 | — | 63% UTC | › | |
| Half final | 7-5 · #248 0-11 · #339 |
— | — | WOF -5.1 | — | 67.1 | — | 71% WOF | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #224 3-12 · #221 |
— | — | USM -3.0 | — | 62.7 | — | 63% USM | › | |
| Half final | 2-11 · #208 7-7 · #283 |
— | — | CCU -3.4 | — | 67.9 | — | 64% CCU | › | |
| Half final | 12-1 · #24 9-4 · #83 |
— | — | BYU -5.5 | — | 77.7 | — | 73% BYU | › | |
| Half final | 12-1 · #2 8-5 · #30 |
— | — | HOU -5.0 | — | 62.0 | — | 71% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 13-0 · #22 9-4 · #79 |
— | — | VAN -5.6 | — | 74.8 | — | 73% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 10-3 · #16 11-1 · #39 |
— | — | KU -2.2 | — | 72.8 | — | 60% KU | › | |
| Half final | 3-10 · #124 9-4 · #101 |
— | — | GW -8.6 | — | 71.3 | — | 83% GW | › | |
| Half final | 10-4 · #91 5-9 · #113 |
— | — | DAY -6.6 | — | 68.0 | — | 76% DAY | › | |
| Half final | 9-2 · #29 10-3 · #40 |
— | — | BAY -0.4 | — | 74.5 | — | 52% BAY | › | |
| Half final | 5-8 · #325 4-8 · #183 |
— | — | PRES -1.2 | — | 65.0 | — | 55% PRES | › | |
| Half final | 3-9 · #271 7-6 · #326 |
— | — | CHSO -1.7 | — | 70.7 | — | 57% CHSO | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #218 10-3 · #90 |
— | — | HPU -9.3 | — | 76.9 | — | 85% HPU | › | |
| Half final | 9-5 · #49 8-6 · #66 |
— | — | DEP -1.1 | — | 69.5 | — | 55% DEP | › | |
| Half final | 7-5 · #199 4-8 · #317 |
— | — | NAVY -2.8 | — | 65.5 | — | 62% NAVY | › | |
| Half final | 5-8 · #201 4-10 · #336 |
— | — | SDST -4.0 | — | 70.7 | — | 67% SDST | › | |
| Half final | 5-7 · #128 6-7 · #188 |
— | — | OHIO -0.4 | — | 70.3 | — | 52% OHIO | › | |
| Half final | 7-4 · #200 8-5 · #209 |
— | — | BGSU -0.7 | — | 70.5 | — | 53% BGSU | › | |
| Half final | 2-9 · #181 10-2 · #237 |
— | — | BUF -4.2 | — | 67.2 | — | 68% BUF | › | |
| Half final | 4-10 · #316 1-11 · #272 |
— | — | BING -0.6 | — | 67.8 | — | 52% BING | › | |
| Half final | 2-10 · #290 1-13 · #323 |
— | — | BRY -1.3 | — | 60.2 | — | 56% BRY | › | |
| Half final | 1-11 · #301 2-10 · #307 |
— | — | UML -2.0 | — | 72.7 | — | 58% UML | › | |
| Half final | 8-4 · #166 5-9 · #262 |
— | — | HOF -4.4 | — | 63.7 | — | 69% HOF | › | |
| Half final | 3-9 · #303 4-8 · #240 |
— | — | CARK -5.9 | — | 68.8 | — | 74% CARK | › | |
| Half final | 2-10 · #294 5-6 · #298 |
— | — | EKU -0.3 | — | 73.9 | — | 51% EKU | › | |
| Half final | 7-6 · #95 9-5 · #94 |
— | — | GT -2.6 | — | 68.0 | — | 61% GT | › | |
| Half final | 13-1 · #44 11-2 · #55 |
— | — | SMU -0.2 | — | 73.8 | — | 51% SMU | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #76 4-8 · #177 |
— | — | MEM -6.4 | — | 68.3 | — | 76% MEM | › | |
| Half final | 5-6 · #157 2-10 · #270 |
— | — | TOL -3.7 | — | 73.4 | — | 66% TOL | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #158 8-4 · #171 |
— | — | ARST -5.5 | — | 76.4 | — | 73% ARST | › | |
| Half final | 4-8 · #266 3-7 · #292 |
— | — | FGCU -0.3 | — | 72.8 | — | 51% FGCU | › | |
| Half final | 3-8 · #295 5-8 · #175 |
— | — | QUC -2.5 | — | 79.2 | — | 61% QUC | › | |
| Half final | 10-3 · #7 10-3 · #18 |
— | — | TENN -0.1 | — | 73.8 | — | 51% TENN | › | |
| Half final | 1-8 · #327 2-10 · #202 |
— | — | BCU -5.2 | — | 69.5 | — | 71% BCU | › | |
| Half final | 8-3 · #118 11-0 · #125 |
— | — | AKR -3.0 | — | 82.5 | — | 63% AKR | › | |
| Half final | 9-5 · #296 3-11 · #234 |
— | — | ODU -0.8 | — | 75.5 | — | 54% ODU | › | |
| Half final | 8-5 · #46 10-3 · #31 |
— | — | OU -2.3 | — | 70.3 | — | 60% OU | › | |
| Half final | 12-1 · #3 7-7 · #81 |
— | — | DUKE -8.8 | — | 74.5 | — | 83% DUKE | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #103 1-12 · #358 |
— | — | TXST -4.0 | — | 71.5 | — | 67% TXST | › | |
| Half final | 13-0 · #5 8-5 · #73 |
— | — | ARIZ -11.0 | — | 75.5 | — | 88% ARIZ | › | |
| Half final | 9-5 · #105 12-1 · #93 |
— | — | GMU -3.4 | — | 66.0 | — | 64% GMU | › | |
| Half final | 4-8 · #143 10-1 · #58 |
— | — | USU -11.0 | — | 70.2 | — | 88% USU | › | |
| Half final | 0-13 · #348 5-8 · #205 |
— | — | WIN -12.2 | — | 76.8 | — | 91% WIN | › | |
| Half final | 7-5 · #134 6-7 · #194 |
— | — | CSUN -0.2 | — | 74.8 | — | 51% CSUN | › | |
| Half final | 2-11 · #305 8-5 · #213 |
— | — | NDSU -7.6 | — | 70.0 | — | 80% NDSU | › | |
| Half final | 5-6 · #275 6-7 · #191 |
— | — | STBK -2.3 | — | 67.2 | — | 60% STBK | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #184 3-9 · #284 |
— | — | SAM -0.8 | — | 70.8 | — | 54% SAM | › | |
| Half final | 2-8 · #215 7-4 · #152 |
— | — | FUR -5.2 | — | 71.4 | — | 72% FUR | › | |
| Half final | 5-6 · #242 7-5 · #173 |
— | — | ETSU -3.9 | — | 69.7 | — | 67% ETSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-6 · #259 8-5 · #231 |
— | — | MRSH -3.4 | — | 66.1 | — | 64% MRSH | › | |
| Half final | 12-1 · #51 10-3 · #28 |
— | — | TA&M -1.0 | — | 80.3 | — | 54% TA&M | › | |
| Half final | 9-3 · #150 5-6 · #253 |
— | — | UVU -4.5 | — | 66.1 | — | 69% UVU | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #197 0-14 · #353 |
— | — | HOW -4.0 | — | 69.2 | — | 67% HOW | › | |
| Half final | 3-10 · #319 0-11 · #357 |
— | — | NORF -1.5 | — | 66.2 | — | 56% NORF | › | |
| Half final | 1-11 · #360 1-12 · #280 |
— | — | JKST -2.3 | — | 71.4 | — | 60% JKST | › | |
| Half final | 1-11 · #345 2-13 · #364 |
— | — | UMES -4.0 | — | 67.3 | — | 67% UMES | › | |
| Half final | 1-15 · #352 2-9 · #351 |
— | — | DSU -6.3 | — | 65.7 | — | 75% DSU | › | |
| Half final | 9-2 · #193 3-9 · #252 |
— | — | SFA -1.9 | — | 63.9 | — | 58% SFA | › | |
| Half final | 4-9 · #276 1-10 · #318 |
— | — | NOLA -0.6 | — | 72.1 | — | 53% NOLA | › | |
| Half final | 4-8 · #342 4-8 · #285 |
— | — | NICH -4.7 | — | 68.9 | — | 70% NICH | › | |
| Half final | 9-4 · #228 7-5 · #147 |
— | — | TROY -4.4 | — | 72.7 | — | 68% TROY | › | |
| Half final | 3-8 · #350 6-5 · #256 |
— | — | SIUE -2.8 | — | 64.5 | — | 62% SIUE | › | |
| Half final | 5-5 · #245 3-9 · #222 |
— | — | TNST -1.4 | — | 67.8 | — | 56% TNST | › | |
| Half final | 1-10 · #304 6-5 · #258 |
— | — | LIN -6.4 | — | 69.0 | — | 76% LIN | › | |
| Half final | 2-9 · #361 7-4 · #341 |
— | — | UTM -5.0 | — | 63.6 | — | 71% UTM | › | |
| Half final | 1-10 · #365 4-7 · #306 |
— | — | SEMO -7.4 | — | 69.5 | — | 79% SEMO | › | |
| Half final | 2-10 · #216 3-11 · #299 |
— | — | BUCK -2.0 | — | 66.2 | — | 58% BUCK | › | |
| Half final | 8-5 · #70 8-5 · #59 |
— | — | NU -3.6 | — | 65.0 | — | 65% NU | › | |
| Half final | 3-10 · #220 5-6 · #98 |
— | — | UNLV -8.7 | — | 69.0 | — | 83% UNLV | › | |
| Half final | 3-8 · #300 4-6 · #289 |
— | — | UIW -4.2 | — | 67.7 | — | 68% UIW | › | |
| Half final | 2-11 · #310 2-10 · #314 |
— | — | L-MD -0.8 | — | 70.4 | — | 54% L-MD | › | |
| Half final | 4-9 · #329 6-5 · #182 |
— | — | UCD -6.5 | — | 71.4 | — | 76% UCD | › | |
| Half final | 1-11 · #254 5-5 · #247 |
— | — | IDHO -3.7 | — | 74.1 | — | 66% IDHO | › | |
| Half final | 0-12 · #333 6-6 · #214 |
— | — | LIP -9.7 | — | 77.6 | — | 86% LIP | › | |
| Half final | 3-9 · #223 5-5 · #210 |
— | — | APSU -5.5 | — | 66.2 | — | 72% APSU | › | |
| Half final | 10-5 · #203 6-5 · #185 |
— | — | TAR -0.7 | — | 68.3 | — | 53% TAR | › | |
| Half final | 10-3 · #65 9-4 · #60 |
— | — | ASU -1.3 | — | 75.3 | — | 56% ASU | › | |
| Half final | 1-8 · #343 4-7 · #338 |
— | — | GRAM -3.9 | — | 71.6 | — | 67% GRAM | › | |
| Half final | 2-7 · #238 3-8 · #287 |
— | — | RGV -0.4 | — | 65.3 | — | 52% RGV | › | |
| Half final | 10-3 · #26 11-2 · #43 |
— | — | IOWA -2.4 | — | 67.5 | — | 60% IOWA | › | |
| Half final | 7-5 · #115 6-6 · #114 |
— | — | JOES -0.3 | — | 67.8 | — | 51% JOES | › | |
| Half final | 0-9 · #322 1-9 · #309 |
— | — | SOU -4.6 | — | 74.9 | — | 69% SOU | › | |
| Half final | 5-8 · #155 6-7 · #165 |
— | — | TOW -4.6 | — | 63.5 | — | 69% TOW | › | |
| Half final | 7-4 · #219 4-6 · #273 |
— | — | UNCO -0.6 | — | 76.1 | — | 52% UNCO | › | |
| Half final | 4-5 · #274 5-6 · #344 |
— | — | IDST -1.7 | — | 68.0 | — | 57% IDST | › | |
| Half final | 8-5 · #53 8-4 · #11 |
— | — | TEX -4.4 | — | 75.5 | — | 68% TEX | › | |
| Half final | 8-5 · #77 5-8 · #141 |
— | — | WICH -3.6 | — | 65.8 | — | 65% WICH | › | |
| Half final | 2-10 · #302 0-13 · #366 |
— | — | ALST -6.9 | — | 70.5 | — | 77% ALST | › | |
| Half final | 4-6 · #328 1-10 · #363 |
— | — | AAMU -1.4 | — | 71.7 | — | 56% AAMU | › | |
| Half final | 10-3 · #4 9-4 · #78 |
— | — | ILL -8.9 | — | 74.1 | — | 83% ILL | › | |
| Half final | 10-3 · #96 5-7 · #174 |
— | — | NEV -4.3 | — | 69.1 | — | 68% NEV | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #159 11-2 · #120 |
— | — | UNCW -6.2 | — | 66.2 | — | 75% UNCW | › | |
| Half final | 8-5 · #149 4-9 · #312 |
— | — | UCI -2.3 | — | 72.1 | — | 60% UCI | › | |
| Half final | 12-1 · #23 9-4 · #41 |
— | — | PUR -5.6 | — | 72.7 | — | 73% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 9-3 · #122 9-3 · #82 |
— | — | UNM -3.7 | — | 71.1 | — | 66% UNM | › | |
| Half final | 8-4 · #87 8-4 · #80 |
— | — | GCU -1.9 | — | 67.5 | — | 58% GCU | › | |
| Half final | 0-12 · #335 3-9 · #279 |
— | — | OMA -4.5 | — | 69.6 | — | 69% OMA | › | |
| Half final | 3-8 · #321 4-7 · #162 |
— | — | MTST -6.0 | — | 65.7 | — | 74% MTST | › | |
| Half final | 9-4 · #1 10-3 · #54 |
— | — | FLA -6.1 | — | 74.0 | — | 75% FLA | › | |
| Half final | 7-5 · #257 1-10 · #267 |
— | — | UTA -3.7 | — | 65.8 | — | 66% UTA | › | |
| Half final | 4-9 · #164 2-10 · #297 |
— | — | LBSU -0.5 | — | 77.1 | — | 52% LBSU | › | |
| Half final | 1-9 · #196 4-8 · #313 |
— | — | WEB -3.3 | — | 75.2 | — | 64% WEB | › | |
| Half final | 8-3 · #86 7-4 · #75 |
— | — | SDSU -0.6 | — | 65.6 | — | 53% SDSU | › | |
| Half final | 9-2 · #140 9-3 · #123 |
— | — | UCSD -1.1 | — | 67.0 | — | 55% UCSD | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record