David R. Stopher Gymnasium · at Nicholls · Conference game
Closing line
NICH -6.5✓ NICH covered by 15.5
Closing total146.5Under by 8.5
| This season | NICH | |
|---|---|---|
| 4-8 | Record | 4-8 |
| 7-5 | ATS | 6-6 |
| 6-6 | O/U | 7-5 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: ETAM 70–78 NICH · ✓ NICH (76%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETAM | 25 | 33 | 58 |
| NICH | 31 | 49 | 80 |
1st half: ETAM 25, NICH 31 (NICH by 6). The model had NICH by 4.7 and a total of 68.9 (actual 56).
Team stats
| ETAM | NICH | |
|---|---|---|
| 24-55 44% | Field goals | 26-65 40% |
| 3-24 13% | 3-pointers | 14-34 41% |
| 7-11 64% | Free throws | 14-22 64% |
| 35 10 off | Rebounds | 39 16 off |
| 18 | Assists | 19 |
| 8 | Steals | 11 |
| 2 | Blocks | 0 |
| 24 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 14 | Fouls | 9 |
| 42 | Points in paint | 24 |
| 16 | Fast-break points | 16 |
Players
| ETAM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianni Hunt G | 33 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 0-5 | 0-3 |
| Damian Garcia G | 22 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2-6 | 0-4 |
| Noah Pagotto F | 19 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 8-12 | 1-3 |
| Michael Folarin F | 16 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| London Fields G | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Evan Phelps G | 27 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0-5 | 0-4 |
| Josh Taylor F | 22 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 8-11 | 0-0 |
| Tay Mosher F | 22 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 3-6 | 2-4 |
| Vinny Sigona G | 18 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-4 |
| Alex McCray G | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Ronnie Harrison, Mykol Sanchez-Vega, Chris Adlam, Kamren Robinson, Parker Whisenhunt, Kollin Tolbert
| NICH | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sincere Malone F | 38 | 21 | 3 | 4 | 8-12 | 1-3 |
| Jaylen Searles G | 30 | 17 | 13 | 7 | 6-13 | 4-6 |
| Trae English G | 27 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2-8 | 1-5 |
| Christian Winborne G | 25 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 5-12 | 5-11 |
| Jalik Dunkley F | 24 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 2-7 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jalin Rice G | 17 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Nick Krass G | 17 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Kevin Pazmino G | 13 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 3-6 |
| Grant Sanders F | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Zee Hamoda G | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Chaydon Stone, Domanic Betancourt, Jordan Matthews, Zaiden Cross
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenNICH -7.5
1 → ETAM
CloseNICH -6.5
1 pt toward ETAM
Total
Open146.5
no move
Close146.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
ETAM +225 · NICH -278
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened NICH -7.5 · closed NICH -6.5 · moved 1 toward ETAMmodel NICH -8
model NICH -8
Opened 146.5 · unchangedmodel 147
model 147
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | NICH -6.5 | NICH -8.1 | NICH +1.6 | W NICH covered |
| Total | 146.5 | 147.0 | Over 0.5 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | ETAM 69.5 · NICH 77.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NICH -4.7 | NICH -6.0 |
| 1H total | 68.9 | 56 |
| 1H projected score | ETAM 32.1 · NICH 36.8 | ETAM 25 · NICH 31 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 7 since 2021-22
ETAM 1–6 NICHNICH leads · 7 games since 2021-22 · NICH has won the last 5 meetings · ETAM 2-5 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2024-25 | ETAM 65 @ NICH 81 | NICH -9.5 | NICH W |
| Jan 6, 2024-25 | NICH 83 @ ETAM 61 | ETAM +5.5 | NICH W |
| Mar 11, 2023-24 | ETAM 51 vs NICH 72 | NICH -5.5 | NICH W |
| Feb 24, 2023-24 | ETAM 70 @ NICH 85 | NICH -9.5 | NICH W |
| Jan 27, 2023-24 | NICH 87 @ ETAM 84 | ETAM -1.5 | NICH W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
East Texas A&M
12 games played
Straight up
4-8
33% wins
Against the spread
7-5
58% covers · avg −1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
6-6
50% overs · avg +1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | @ | L 54-76 | +22.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 74-100 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 64-71 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 70-65 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 84-67 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 59-83 | +36.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 75-68 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 66-102 | +20.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 15 | @ | W 70-69 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 77-118 | +28.5 | L −12.5 | 166.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 48-75 | +4.5 | L −22.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 62-69 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
@
UNM
L 54-76
+0.5
10
@
HAW
L 74-100
−7.5
14
@
RICE
L 64-71
+3.5
24
@
FDU
W 70-65
+1.5
25
vs
ARMY
W 84-67
+14.5
5
@
CONN
L 59-83
+12.5
7
vs
CARK
W 75-68
+4.5
12
@
MCN
L 66-102
−15.5
15
@
SELA
W 70-69
+5.5
21
@
TA&M
L 77-118
−12.5
29
vs
SFA
L 48-75
−22.5
31
vs
LAM
L 62-69
−1.5
covered 7didn’t cover 5avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
@
UNM
L 54-76
−13.5
10
@
HAW
L 74-100
+28.5
14
@
RICE
L 64-71
−11.5
24
@
FDU
W 70-65
−14.5
25
vs
ARMY
W 84-67
+7.5
5
@
CONN
L 59-83
+0.5
7
vs
CARK
W 75-68
−2.5
12
@
MCN
L 66-102
+25.5
15
@
SELA
W 70-69
+1.5
21
@
TA&M
L 77-118
+28.5
29
vs
SFA
L 48-75
−23.5
31
vs
LAM
L 62-69
−12.5
over 6under 6avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Nicholls
12 games played
Straight up
4-8
33% wins
Against the spread
6-6
50% covers · avg +2.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
7-5
58% overs · avg +5.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 51-77 | +31.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 57-65 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 63-68 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 79-99 | +14.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 81-95 | +23.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 72-82 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 76-96 | +18.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 74-67 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 79-64 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 82-95 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 76-71 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 71-69 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
UK
L 51-77
+5.5
7
@
EIU
L 57-65
−10.5
12
@
VAL
L 63-68
−2.5
15
@
MUR
L 79-99
−5.5
22
@
OKST
L 81-95
+9.5
28
@
TULN
L 72-82
−1.5
2
@
CREI
L 76-96
−1.5
6
vs
UIW
W 74-67
+8.5
17
vs
HCU
W 79-64
+11.5
21
@
PAC
L 82-95
−4.5
29
@
AMCC
W 76-71
+10.5
31
@
RGV
W 71-69
+5.5
covered 6didn’t cover 6avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
UK
L 51-77
−29.5
7
@
EIU
L 57-65
−13.5
12
@
VAL
L 63-68
−13.5
15
@
MUR
L 79-99
+20.5
22
@
OKST
L 81-95
+20.5
28
@
TULN
L 72-82
+5.5
2
@
CREI
L 76-96
+28.5
6
vs
UIW
W 74-67
−4.5
17
vs
HCU
W 79-64
+5.5
21
@
PAC
L 82-95
+37.5
29
@
AMCC
W 76-71
+9.5
31
@
RGV
W 71-69
−5.5
over 7under 5avg +5.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
East Texas A&M
4-8 overall · 1-3 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Lamar62–69
- Lvs SF Austin48–75
- L@ Texas A&M77–118
- W@ SE Louisiana70–69
- L@ McNeese66–102
3 days since their last game.
Nicholls
4-8 overall · 4-0 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ UT Rio Grande71–69
- W@ Texas A&M-CC76–71
- L@ Pacific82–95
- Wvs Hou Christian79–64
- Wvs Incarnate Word74–67
3 days since their last game.