The Pit · at New Mexico
Closing line
UNM -22.5✓ ETAM covered by 0.5
Closing total143.5Under by 13.5
| This season | UNM | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: ETAM 63–84 UNM · ✓ UNM (97%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETAM | 14 | 40 | 54 |
| UNM | 34 | 42 | 76 |
1st half: ETAM 14, UNM 34 (UNM by 20). The model had UNM by 12.9 and a total of 68.6 (actual 48).
Team stats
| ETAM | UNM | |
|---|---|---|
| 21-62 34% | Field goals | 27-63 43% |
| 5-34 15% | 3-pointers | 8-20 40% |
| 7-11 64% | Free throws | 14-23 61% |
| 39 11 off | Rebounds | 43 12 off |
| 9 | Assists | 15 |
| 8 | Steals | 11 |
| 3 | Blocks | 1 |
| 21 | Turnovers | 15 |
| 19 | Fouls | 13 |
| 28 | Points in paint | 38 |
| 14 | Fast-break points | 15 |
Players
| ETAM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianni Hunt G | 29 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-3 |
| Vinny Sigona G | 24 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 3-10 | 1-7 |
| Ronnie Harrison F | 23 | 18 | 7 | 0 | 6-12 | 3-6 |
| London Fields G | 15 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-3 |
| Josh Taylor F | 10 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Evan Phelps G | 20 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-4 |
| Michael Folarin F | 20 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| Noah Pagotto F | 19 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
| Damian Garcia G | 17 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3-9 | 0-5 |
| Alex McCray G | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Tay Mosher F | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-2 |
| Mykol Sanchez-Vega G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Kamren Robinson, Chris Adlam, Parker Whisenhunt, Kollin Tolbert
| UNM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jake Hall G | 25 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 6-12 | 2-6 |
| Tomislav Buljan F | 24 | 8 | 15 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-0 |
| Deyton Albury G | 24 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-1 |
| Chris Howell G | 21 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Antonio Chol F | 21 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 4-10 | 1-6 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Uriah Tenette G | 24 | 14 | 2 | 5 | 5-11 | 2-3 |
| Luke Haupt G | 23 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Tajavis Miller G | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4-5 | 3-3 |
| Kevin Patton Jr. G | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| JT Rock C | 9 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Milos Vicentic F | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Timeo Pons G | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Sir Marius Jones, Kallai Patton
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUNM -20.5
2 → UNM
CloseUNM -22.5
2 pts toward UNM
Total
Open143.5
no move
Close143.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
ETAM +2500 · UNM -10000
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened UNM -20.5 · closed UNM -22.5 · moved 2 toward UNMmodel UNM -21.5
model UNM -21.5
Opened 143.5 · unchangedmodel 146.5
model 146.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | UNM -22.5 | UNM -21.5 | ETAM +1.0 | W ETAM covered |
| Total | 143.5 | 146.4 | Over 2.9 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | ETAM 62.5 · UNM 84 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNM -12.9 | UNM -20.0 |
| 1H total | 68.6 | 48 |
| 1H projected score | ETAM 27.8 · UNM 40.8 | ETAM 14 · UNM 34 |
Showing 2024-25 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2024-25
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2024-25
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
East Texas A&M
31 games played
Straight up
5-26
16% wins
Against the spread
15-16
48% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 67-89 | +30.5 | W +8.5 | 154.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 83-91 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 55-87 | +31.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 70-68 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 46-81 | +38.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 56-84 | +24.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 65-67 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 57-77 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 79-83 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 136.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 53-65 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 72-81 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 68-67 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 62-88 | +11.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 56-75 | +16.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 61-83 | +5.5 | L −16.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 67-75 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 134.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 55-57 | +12.5 | W +10.5 | 149.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 73-82 | -6.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 68-76 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 58-61 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 72-79 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 129.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 72-50 | +3.5 | W +25.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 66-78 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 65-81 | +9.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 51-67 | +19.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 118 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 55-65 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 74-76 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 132.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 65-83 | +9.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 73-71 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 68-75 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 63-59 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
IOWA
L 67-89
+8.5
6
@
SDAK
L 83-91
+2.5
8
@
TA&M
L 55-87
−0.5
13
vs
SOU
W 70-68
+5.5
19
@
CONN
L 46-81
+3.5
21
@
OU
L 56-84
−3.5
25
@
STO
L 65-67
+0.5
30
vs
PFW
L 57-77
−11.5
5
@
HCU
L 79-83
−0.5
7
@
UIW
L 53-65
−4.5
15
vs
USA
L 72-81
−1.5
18
vs
ACU
W 68-67
+10.5
21
@
USF
L 62-88
−14.5
4
vs
MCN
L 56-75
−2.5
6
vs
NICH
L 61-83
−16.5
11
@
NWST
L 67-75
+1.5
13
@
RGV
L 55-57
+10.5
18
vs
NOLA
L 73-82
−15.5
20
vs
SELA
L 68-76
−1.5
25
@
LAM
L 58-61
+6.5
27
@
SFA
L 72-79
+2.5
1
vs
NWST
W 72-50
+25.5
3
vs
AMCC
L 66-78
−4.5
8
@
NICH
L 65-81
−6.5
10
@
MCN
L 51-67
+3.5
15
vs
LAM
L 55-65
−4.5
17
vs
SFA
L 74-76
+4.5
22
@
SELA
L 65-83
−8.5
24
@
NOLA
W 73-71
+0.5
1
vs
UIW
L 68-75
−2.5
3
vs
HCU
W 63-59
+5.5
covered 15didn’t cover 16avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
IOWA
L 67-89
+1.5
6
@
SDAK
L 83-91
+24.5
8
@
TA&M
L 55-87
−1.5
13
vs
SOU
W 70-68
−9.5
19
@
CONN
L 46-81
−20.5
21
@
OU
L 56-84
−4.5
25
@
STO
L 65-67
−5.5
30
vs
PFW
L 57-77
−14.5
5
@
HCU
L 79-83
+25.5
7
@
UIW
L 53-65
−27.5
15
vs
USA
L 72-81
+17.5
18
vs
ACU
W 68-67
−5.5
21
@
USF
L 62-88
+5.5
4
vs
MCN
L 56-75
−6.5
6
vs
NICH
L 61-83
+1.5
11
@
NWST
L 67-75
+7.5
13
@
RGV
L 55-57
−37.5
18
vs
NOLA
L 73-82
+10.5
20
vs
SELA
L 68-76
+6.5
25
@
LAM
L 58-61
−17.5
27
@
SFA
L 72-79
+21.5
1
vs
NWST
W 72-50
−10.5
3
vs
AMCC
L 66-78
+2.5
8
@
NICH
L 65-81
+6.5
10
@
MCN
L 51-67
−17.5
15
vs
LAM
L 55-65
−14.5
17
vs
SFA
L 74-76
+17.5
22
@
SELA
L 65-83
+6.5
24
@
NOLA
W 73-71
+0.5
1
vs
UIW
L 68-75
+5.5
3
vs
HCU
W 63-59
−11.5
over 16under 15avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
New Mexico
34 games played
Straight up
26-8
76% wins
Against the spread
16-18
47% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-20
41% overs · avg −2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 91-84 | -17.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 72-64 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 100-81 | -16.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 71-85 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 80-58 | -23.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 99-68 | -24.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 82-85 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 83-73 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 83-77 | -19.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 83-89 | -20.5 | L −26.5 | 151.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 78-71 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 76-68 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 103-89 | -15.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | O 192 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 82-81 | -5.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 61-53 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 62-48 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 70-71 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 84-65 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 95-67 | -21.5 | W +6.5 | 160.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 25 | @ | W 75-73 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 82-63 | +4.5 | W +23.5 | 158.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 87-65 | -8.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 88-53 | -14.5 | W +20.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 71-67 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 82-79 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 78-86 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 65-73 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 92-71 | -22.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 71-67 | -0.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 81-67 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 63-52 | -15.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | U 115 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 69-72 | -0.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 21 | vs | W 75-66 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 23 | vs | L 63-71 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
NICH
W 91-84
−10.5
8
vs
UCLA
W 72-64
+12.5
12
vs
AMCC
W 100-81
+2.5
17
@
SJU
L 71-85
−6.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 80-58
−1.5
24
vs
TXSO
W 99-68
+6.5
28
vs
ASU
L 82-85
−7.5
29
vs
USC
W 83-73
+4.5
4
vs
SJSU
W 83-77
−13.5
7
vs
NMSU
L 83-89
−26.5
18
vs
VCU
W 78-71
+3.5
28
@
CSU
W 76-68
+9.5
31
@
FRES
W 103-89
−1.5
3
vs
NEV
W 82-81
−4.5
7
@
WYO
W 61-53
+0.5
11
vs
SDSU
W 62-48
+10.5
14
@
SJSU
L 70-71
−10.5
17
vs
BOIS
W 84-65
+15.5
20
vs
FRES
W 95-67
+6.5
25
@
UNLV
W 75-73
−1.5
1
@
USU
W 82-63
+23.5
5
vs
CSU
W 87-65
+13.5
8
@
AF
W 88-53
+20.5
12
vs
WYO
W 71-67
−12.5
16
vs
USU
W 82-79
−2.5
19
@
BOIS
L 78-86
−3.5
25
@
SDSU
L 65-73
−6.5
1
vs
AF
W 92-71
−1.5
4
@
NEV
W 71-67
+3.5
7
vs
UNLV
W 81-67
+2.5
13
vs
SJSU
W 63-52
−4.5
14
vs
BOIS
L 69-72
−3.5
21
vs
MARQ
W 75-66
+13.5
23
vs
MSU
L 63-71
−1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 18avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
NICH
W 91-84
+23.5
8
vs
UCLA
W 72-64
−16.5
12
vs
AMCC
W 100-81
+21.5
17
@
SJU
L 71-85
−6.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 80-58
−14.5
24
vs
TXSO
W 99-68
+9.5
28
vs
ASU
L 82-85
+8.5
29
vs
USC
W 83-73
+2.5
4
vs
SJSU
W 83-77
+9.5
7
vs
NMSU
L 83-89
+20.5
18
vs
VCU
W 78-71
−2.5
28
@
CSU
W 76-68
−8.5
31
@
FRES
W 103-89
+31.5
3
vs
NEV
W 82-81
+11.5
7
@
WYO
W 61-53
−30.5
11
vs
SDSU
W 62-48
−37.5
14
@
SJSU
L 70-71
−12.5
17
vs
BOIS
W 84-65
−4.5
20
vs
FRES
W 95-67
+1.5
25
@
UNLV
W 75-73
−0.5
1
@
USU
W 82-63
−13.5
5
vs
CSU
W 87-65
+1.5
8
@
AF
W 88-53
−4.5
12
vs
WYO
W 71-67
−5.5
16
vs
USU
W 82-79
+2.5
19
@
BOIS
L 78-86
+11.5
25
@
SDSU
L 65-73
−5.5
1
vs
AF
W 92-71
+18.5
4
@
NEV
W 71-67
−11.5
7
vs
UNLV
W 81-67
−0.5
13
vs
SJSU
W 63-52
−35.5
14
vs
BOIS
L 69-72
−5.5
21
vs
MARQ
W 75-66
−12.5
23
vs
MSU
L 63-71
−14.5
over 14under 20avg −2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
East Texas A&M
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Southland Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.
New Mexico
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.