Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
5-8 · #204
40
6-6 · #265
43
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
37–37
✗ OAK lost
Half finalConference
5-6 · #184
34
VMI
2-8 · #320
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
38–34
✗ SAM lost
Half finalConference
8-5 · #296
41
7-6 · #283
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
36–37
✗ CCU lost
Half finalConference
2-9 · #303
26
3-6 · #292
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
31–37
✓ UNA won
Half finalConference
2-10 · #305
20
3-10 · #336
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–36
✓ UND won
Half finalConference
2-11 · #340
39
7-5 · #230
35
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.5
Projected
36–44
✗ NKU lost
Half finalConference
6-7 · #235
28
5-7 · #180
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
34–37
✓ WRST won
Half finalConference
4-8 · #226
30
5-7 · #249
24
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
34–38
✗ PFW lost
Half finalConference
3-8 · #223
27
5-6 · #214
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
31–38
✓ LIP won
Half finalConference
FGCU
4-7 · #266
40
3-8 · #240
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
37–36
✓ FGCU won
Half finalConference
5-7 · #176
25
5-8 · #195
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
33–37
✓ SIU won
Half finalConference
2-10 · #255
28
10-3 · #116
46
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
29–37
✓ ILST won
Half finalConference
10-4 · #203
26
6-5 · #257
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.2
Projected
33–31
✗ CBU lost
Half finalConference
3-7 · #227
34
2-9 · #284
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
35–35
✓ UTC won
Half finalConference
3-5 · #274
30
4-7 · #313
37
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–35
✓ WEB won
Half finalConference
1-9 · #365
31
6-4 · #341
29
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
29–37
✗ UTM lost
Half finalConference
23
SIUE
5-5 · #256
28
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
30–35
✓ SIUE won
Half finalConference
3-7 · #350
38
5-5 · #258
44
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
33–38
✓ LIN won
Half finalConference
6-6 · #194
33
5-5 · #182
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
36–39
✓ UCD won
Half finalConference
7-5 · #149
39
4-8 · #329
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
36–31
✓ UCI won
Half finalConference
5-7 · #224
45
1-11 · #358
38
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
40–34
✓ USM won
Half finalConference
Omaha
3-8 · #279
36
4-8 · #201
36
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
34–38
 
Half finalConference
3-7 · #321
34
3-6 · #273
34
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
33–36
 
Half finalConference
3-8 · #282
28
2-9 · #222
26
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
34–34
✓ TNTC won
Half finalConference
9-4 · #167
39
11-2 · #138
42
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
35–37
✓ BEL won
Half finalConference
2-9 · #294
49
46
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.8
Projected
38–40
✗ QUC lost
Half finalConference
3-7 · #295
37
4-6 · #298
52
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
37–36
✗ BELL lost
Half finalConference
6-6 · #207
38
9-3 · #131
33
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
30–36
✗ UNI lost
Half finalConference
8-2 · #140
45
4-8 · #281
27
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
37–32
✓ HAW won
Half finalConference
0-11 · #333
42
4-5 · #210
48
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
33–41
✓ APSU won
Half finalConference
8-3 · #150
43
6-4 · #185
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
35–33
✓ UVU won
Half finalConference
5-7 · #268
40
5-5 · #253
24
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
32–34
✗ ACU lost
Half finalConference
2-8 · #361
37
3-7 · #306
30
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
32–37
✗ SEMO lost
Half finalConference
11-3 · #132
36
UIC
3-8 · #110
40
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
39–36
✗ MUR lost
Half finalConference
7-3 · #219
33
3-7 · #162
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
36–37
✓ MTST won
Half finalConference
1-8 · #196
32
4-6 · #344
41
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
32–37
✓ IDST won
Half finalConference
7-4 · #134
36
3-9 · #312
50
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
38–36
✗ UCSB lost
Half finalConference
9-2 · #123
42
3-9 · #164
39
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.8
Projected
42–36
✓ UCSD won
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Half final
5-8 · #204
40
6-6 · #265
43
— — OAK -0.4 — 73.8 — 52% OAK ›
Half final
5-6 · #184
34
2-8 · #320
36
— — SAM -3.8 — 72.2 — 66% SAM ›
Half final
8-5 · #296
41
7-6 · #283
33
— — CCU -0.6 — 73.0 — 52% CCU ›
Half final
2-9 · #303
26
3-6 · #292
27
— — UNA -6.8 — 68.0 — 77% UNA ›
Half final
2-10 · #305
20
3-10 · #336
37
— — UND -1.1 — 70.3 — 55% UND ›
Half final
2-11 · #340
39
7-5 · #230
35
— — NKU -8.2 — 80.5 — 81% NKU ›
Half final
6-7 · #235
28
5-7 · #180
41
— — WRST -2.5 — 70.7 — 61% WRST ›
Half final
4-8 · #226
30
5-7 · #249
24
— — PFW -4.6 — 71.6 — 69% PFW ›
Half final
3-8 · #223
27
5-6 · #214
37
— — LIP -6.6 — 69.0 — 76% LIP ›
Half final
4-7 · #266
40
3-8 · #240
37
— — FGCU -0.7 — 73.3 — 53% FGCU ›
Half final
5-7 · #176
25
5-8 · #195
36
— — SIU -4.6 — 70.2 — 69% SIU ›
Half final
2-10 · #255
28
10-3 · #116
46
— — ILST -8.5 — 66.1 — 82% ILST ›
Half final
10-4 · #203
26
6-5 · #257
28
— — CBU -1.3 — 64.2 — 56% CBU ›
Half final
3-7 · #227
34
2-9 · #284
33
— — UTC -0.2 — 69.9 — 51% UTC ›
Half final
3-5 · #274
30
4-7 · #313
37
— — WEB -0.4 — 70.3 — 52% WEB ›
Half final
1-9 · #365
31
6-4 · #341
29
— — UTM -7.4 — 65.5 — 79% UTM ›
Half final
5-5 · #256
28
— — SIUE -4.8 — 65.0 — 70% SIUE ›
Half final
3-7 · #350
38
5-5 · #258
44
— — LIN -4.8 — 70.3 — 70% LIN ›
Half final
6-6 · #194
33
5-5 · #182
38
— — UCD -3.1 — 75.3 — 63% UCD ›
Half final
7-5 · #149
39
4-8 · #329
34
— — UCI -5.4 — 66.8 — 72% UCI ›
Half final
5-7 · #224
45
1-11 · #358
38
— — USM -5.4 — 73.7 — 72% USM ›
Half final
3-8 · #279
36
4-8 · #201
36
— — SDST -3.9 — 71.9 — 67% SDST ›
Half final
3-7 · #321
34
3-6 · #273
34
— — MONT -3.0 — 69.0 — 63% MONT ›
Half final
3-8 · #282
28
2-9 · #222
26
— — TNTC -0.5 — 67.6 — 52% TNTC ›
Half final
9-4 · #167
39
11-2 · #138
42
— — BEL -2.5 — 71.8 — 61% BEL ›
Half final
2-9 · #294
49
— — QUC -2.4 — 77.8 — 60% QUC ›
Half final
3-7 · #295
37
4-6 · #298
52
— — BELL -0.8 — 73.3 — 53% BELL ›
Half final
6-6 · #207
38
9-3 · #131
33
— — UNI -6.1 — 65.0 — 75% UNI ›
Half final
8-2 · #140
45
4-8 · #281
27
— — HAW -4.9 — 68.5 — 70% HAW ›
Half final
0-11 · #333
42
4-5 · #210
48
— — APSU -7.8 — 74.0 — 80% APSU ›
Half final
8-3 · #150
43
6-4 · #185
40
— — UVU -2.0 — 68.8 — 59% UVU ›
Half final
5-7 · #268
40
5-5 · #253
24
— — ACU -2.4 — 66.3 — 60% ACU ›
Half final
2-8 · #361
37
3-7 · #306
30
— — SEMO -5.3 — 69.3 — 72% SEMO ›
Half final
11-3 · #132
36
3-8 · #110
40
— — MUR -3.0 — 75.3 — 63% MUR ›
Half final
7-3 · #219
33
3-7 · #162
39
— — MTST -1.0 — 72.6 — 54% MTST ›
Half final
1-8 · #196
32
4-6 · #344
41
— — IDST -4.7 — 69.1 — 70% IDST ›
Half final
7-4 · #134
36
3-9 · #312
50
— — UCSB -2.1 — 74.7 — 59% UCSB ›
Half final
9-2 · #123
42
3-9 · #164
39
— — UCSD -5.9 — 77.8 — 74% UCSD ›
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record