No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
37–37
✗ OAK lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
38–34
✗ SAM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
36–37
✗ CCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
31–37
✓ UNA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–36
✓ UND won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.5
Projected
36–44
✗ NKU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
34–37
✓ WRST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
34–38
✗ PFW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
31–38
✓ LIP won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
37–36
✓ FGCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
33–37
✓ SIU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
29–37
✓ ILST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.2
Projected
33–31
✗ CBU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
35–35
✓ UTC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
35–35
✓ WEB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
29–37
✗ UTM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
30–35
✓ SIUE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
33–38
✓ LIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
36–39
✓ UCD won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
36–31
✓ UCI won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
40–34
✓ USM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
34–38
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
33–36
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
34–34
✓ TNTC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
35–37
✓ BEL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.8
Projected
38–40
✗ QUC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
37–36
✗ BELL lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
30–36
✗ UNI lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
37–32
✓ HAW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
33–41
✓ APSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
35–33
✓ UVU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
32–34
✗ ACU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
32–37
✗ SEMO lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
39–36
✗ MUR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
36–37
✓ MTST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
32–37
✓ IDST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
38–36
✗ UCSB lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.8
Projected
42–36
✓ UCSD won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 5-8 · #204 6-6 · #265 |
— | — | OAK -0.4 | — | 73.8 | — | 52% OAK | › | |
| Half final | 5-6 · #184 2-8 · #320 |
— | — | SAM -3.8 | — | 72.2 | — | 66% SAM | › | |
| Half final | 8-5 · #296 7-6 · #283 |
— | — | CCU -0.6 | — | 73.0 | — | 52% CCU | › | |
| Half final | 2-9 · #303 3-6 · #292 |
— | — | UNA -6.8 | — | 68.0 | — | 77% UNA | › | |
| Half final | 2-10 · #305 3-10 · #336 |
— | — | UND -1.1 | — | 70.3 | — | 55% UND | › | |
| Half final | 2-11 · #340 7-5 · #230 |
— | — | NKU -8.2 | — | 80.5 | — | 81% NKU | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #235 5-7 · #180 |
— | — | WRST -2.5 | — | 70.7 | — | 61% WRST | › | |
| Half final | 4-8 · #226 5-7 · #249 |
— | — | PFW -4.6 | — | 71.6 | — | 69% PFW | › | |
| Half final | 3-8 · #223 5-6 · #214 |
— | — | LIP -6.6 | — | 69.0 | — | 76% LIP | › | |
| Half final | 4-7 · #266 3-8 · #240 |
— | — | FGCU -0.7 | — | 73.3 | — | 53% FGCU | › | |
| Half final | 5-7 · #176 5-8 · #195 |
— | — | SIU -4.6 | — | 70.2 | — | 69% SIU | › | |
| Half final | 2-10 · #255 10-3 · #116 |
— | — | ILST -8.5 | — | 66.1 | — | 82% ILST | › | |
| Half final | 10-4 · #203 6-5 · #257 |
— | — | CBU -1.3 | — | 64.2 | — | 56% CBU | › | |
| Half final | 3-7 · #227 2-9 · #284 |
— | — | UTC -0.2 | — | 69.9 | — | 51% UTC | › | |
| Half final | 3-5 · #274 4-7 · #313 |
— | — | WEB -0.4 | — | 70.3 | — | 52% WEB | › | |
| Half final | 1-9 · #365 6-4 · #341 |
— | — | UTM -7.4 | — | 65.5 | — | 79% UTM | › | |
| Half final | 1-9 · #304 5-5 · #256 |
— | — | SIUE -4.8 | — | 65.0 | — | 70% SIUE | › | |
| Half final | 3-7 · #350 5-5 · #258 |
— | — | LIN -4.8 | — | 70.3 | — | 70% LIN | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #194 5-5 · #182 |
— | — | UCD -3.1 | — | 75.3 | — | 63% UCD | › | |
| Half final | 7-5 · #149 4-8 · #329 |
— | — | UCI -5.4 | — | 66.8 | — | 72% UCI | › | |
| Half final | 5-7 · #224 1-11 · #358 |
— | — | USM -5.4 | — | 73.7 | — | 72% USM | › | |
| Half final | 3-8 · #279 4-8 · #201 |
— | — | SDST -3.9 | — | 71.9 | — | 67% SDST | › | |
| Half final | 3-7 · #321 3-6 · #273 |
— | — | MONT -3.0 | — | 69.0 | — | 63% MONT | › | |
| Half final | 3-8 · #282 2-9 · #222 |
— | — | TNTC -0.5 | — | 67.6 | — | 52% TNTC | › | |
| Half final | 9-4 · #167 11-2 · #138 |
— | — | BEL -2.5 | — | 71.8 | — | 61% BEL | › | |
| Half final | 2-9 · #294 4-8 · #175 |
— | — | QUC -2.4 | — | 77.8 | — | 60% QUC | › | |
| Half final | 3-7 · #295 4-6 · #298 |
— | — | BELL -0.8 | — | 73.3 | — | 53% BELL | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #207 9-3 · #131 |
— | — | UNI -6.1 | — | 65.0 | — | 75% UNI | › | |
| Half final | 8-2 · #140 4-8 · #281 |
— | — | HAW -4.9 | — | 68.5 | — | 70% HAW | › | |
| Half final | 0-11 · #333 4-5 · #210 |
— | — | APSU -7.8 | — | 74.0 | — | 80% APSU | › | |
| Half final | 8-3 · #150 6-4 · #185 |
— | — | UVU -2.0 | — | 68.8 | — | 59% UVU | › | |
| Half final | 5-7 · #268 5-5 · #253 |
— | — | ACU -2.4 | — | 66.3 | — | 60% ACU | › | |
| Half final | 2-8 · #361 3-7 · #306 |
— | — | SEMO -5.3 | — | 69.3 | — | 72% SEMO | › | |
| Half final | 11-3 · #132 3-8 · #110 |
— | — | MUR -3.0 | — | 75.3 | — | 63% MUR | › | |
| Half final | 7-3 · #219 3-7 · #162 |
— | — | MTST -1.0 | — | 72.6 | — | 54% MTST | › | |
| Half final | 1-8 · #196 4-6 · #344 |
— | — | IDST -4.7 | — | 69.1 | — | 70% IDST | › | |
| Half final | 7-4 · #134 3-9 · #312 |
— | — | UCSB -2.1 | — | 74.7 | — | 59% UCSB | › | |
| Half final | 9-2 · #123 3-9 · #164 |
— | — | UCSD -5.9 | — | 77.8 | — | 74% UCSD | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record