No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
29–41
✓ PSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
33–34
✗ SHU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.5
Projected
32–33
✗ DEL lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.0
Projected
29–47
✓ ILL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
32–34
✓ QUIN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
27–44
✓ IOWA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
35–36
✓ W&M won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
27–47
✓ FLA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
38–32
✓ UMBC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
32–37
✗ YSU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
29–44
✓ MICH won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
30–45
✓ PUR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
31–44
✓ MSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
25–45
✓ VAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 78.9
Projected
31–48
✗ UGA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.7
Projected
37–40
✓ MUR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
39–36
✓ BEL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.6
Projected
27–38
✓ RUTG won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
33–34
✓ FAIR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
30–38
✓ CIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.9
Projected
37–38
✓ WRST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
35–36
✗ RMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.8
Projected
40–42
✓ CLE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
38–35
✓ IONA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
35–36
✓ RID won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
37–32
✗ UNCW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
31–37
✗ COFC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
32–37
✓ HOF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
32–34
✗ HAMP lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
36–38
✓ ELON won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
35–33
✗ WKU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
31–43
✓ MSST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
33–33
✗ NWST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
35–32
✓ SFA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 60.5
Projected
29–31
✓ LT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
24–44
✓ ISU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.7
Projected
25–40
✓ HOU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.4
Projected
35–46
✓ ALA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.3
Projected
31–45
✓ ARK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 61.5
Projected
27–34
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.1
Projected
30–37
✗ BRAD lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
27–42
✓ MISS won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
31–43
✓ LSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.0
Projected
31–48
✓ TA&M won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
25–48
✓ OU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.9
Projected
37–38
✓ MILW won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.5
Projected
32–44
✓ OKST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
26–42
✓ TCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
32–36
✗ UVU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.7
Projected
33–33
✗ UTA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
35–38
✗ RGV lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.3
Projected
32–34
✗ AMCC lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
28–45
✓ ARIZ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
34–33
✓ ILST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
26–40
✓ MINN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
33–38
✓ UTU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.1
Projected
33–48
✓ AUB won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
34–40
✗ WASH lost
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 0-10 · #357 8-4 · #78 |
— | — | PSU -12.1 | — | 70.5 | — | 91% PSU | › | |
| Half final | 6-7 · #225 4-8 · #311 |
— | — | SHU -0.9 | — | 67.4 | — | 54% SHU | › | |
| Half final | 3-5 · #250 4-6 · #206 |
— | — | DEL -1.1 | — | 64.5 | — | 55% DEL | › | |
| Half final | 1-8 · #309 9-3 · #4 |
— | — | ILL -18.5 | — | 76.0 | — | 98% ILL | › | |
| Half final | 7-3 · #236 8-4 · #241 |
— | — | QUIN -1.6 | — | 66.3 | — | 57% QUIN | › | |
| Half final | 2-9 · #307 10-2 · #43 |
— | — | IOWA -17.2 | — | 70.4 | — | 97% IOWA | › | |
| Half final | 6-5 · #165 7-3 · #217 |
— | — | W&M -1.0 | — | 70.2 | — | 54% W&M | › | |
| Half final | 4-6 · #251 8-4 · #1 |
— | — | FLA -19.7 | — | 73.4 | — | 98% FLA | › | |
| Half final | 4-6 · #264 1-14 · #352 |
— | — | UMBC -6.2 | — | 70.2 | — | 75% UMBC | › | |
| Half final | 3-7 · #277 6-5 · #265 |
— | — | YSU -5.1 | — | 69.6 | — | 71% YSU | › | |
| Half final | 8-2 · #127 11-0 · #8 |
— | — | MICH -14.4 | — | 72.9 | — | 94% MICH | › | |
| Half final | 8-2 · #151 11-1 · #23 |
— | — | PUR -15.8 | — | 74.8 | — | 96% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 5-5 · #179 11-1 · #10 |
— | — | MSU -13.3 | — | 74.7 | — | 93% MSU | › | |
| Half final | 2-7 · #355 12-0 · #22 |
— | — | VAN -19.9 | — | 69.2 | — | 98% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #324 11-1 · #34 |
— | — | UGA -16.4 | — | 78.9 | — | 96% UGA | › | |
| Half final | 5-7 · #195 10-3 · #132 |
— | — | MUR -3.0 | — | 76.7 | — | 63% MUR | › | |
| Half final | 11-1 · #138 5-6 · #207 |
— | — | BEL -3.7 | — | 74.8 | — | 66% BEL | › | |
| Half final | 2-8 · #351 6-6 · #62 |
— | — | RUTG -11.1 | — | 64.6 | — | 89% RUTG | › | |
| Half final | 4-5 · #269 7-5 · #239 |
— | — | FAIR -1.3 | — | 66.9 | — | 56% FAIR | › | |
| Half final | 5-5 · #214 7-5 · #30 |
— | — | CIN -7.5 | — | 67.8 | — | 79% CIN | › | |
| Half final | 5-7 · #204 4-7 · #180 |
— | — | WRST -0.5 | — | 74.9 | — | 52% WRST | › | |
| Half final | 6-5 · #230 8-4 · #168 |
— | — | RMU -1.0 | — | 70.7 | — | 54% RMU | › | |
| Half final | 2-10 · #340 1-10 · #315 |
— | — | CLE -2.0 | — | 81.8 | — | 58% CLE | › | |
| Half final | 9-4 · #233 3-9 · #278 |
— | — | IONA -2.6 | — | 72.3 | — | 61% IONA | › | |
| Half final | 4-8 · #330 0-10 · #347 |
— | — | RID -0.7 | — | 70.4 | — | 53% RID | › | |
| Half final | 9-2 · #120 5-4 · #275 |
— | — | UNCW -4.8 | — | 68.2 | — | 70% UNCW | › | |
| Half final | 5-7 · #262 6-6 · #117 |
— | — | COFC -5.8 | — | 67.8 | — | 74% COFC | › | |
| Half final | 4-7 · #243 7-4 · #166 |
— | — | HOF -5.2 | — | 69.0 | — | 72% HOF | › | |
| Half final | 6-5 · #191 4-7 · #159 |
— | — | HAMP -1.7 | — | 66.0 | — | 57% HAMP | › | |
| Half final | 4-7 · #229 6-5 · #232 |
— | — | ELON -2.3 | — | 74.3 | — | 60% ELON | › | |
| Half final | 5-4 · #129 2-6 · #198 |
— | — | WKU -1.7 | — | 68.2 | — | 57% WKU | › | |
| Half final | 2-9 · #302 7-5 · #53 |
— | — | MSST -11.3 | — | 73.7 | — | 89% MSST | › | |
| Half final | 3-6 · #293 1-8 · #318 |
— | — | NWST -0.2 | — | 66.3 | — | 51% NWST | › | |
| Half final | 7-2 · #193 4-6 · #342 |
— | — | SFA -3.1 | — | 67.7 | — | 63% SFA | › | |
| Half final | 1-7 · #190 4-4 · #244 |
— | — | LT -2.0 | — | 60.5 | — | 58% LT | › | |
| Half final | 3-7 · #300 12-0 · #13 |
— | — | ISU -20.3 | — | 68.4 | — | 99% ISU | › | |
| Half final | 4-4 · #154 11-1 · #2 |
— | — | HOU -14.6 | — | 64.7 | — | 94% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 9-1 · #126 9-3 · #15 |
— | — | ALA -10.6 | — | 81.4 | — | 87% ALA | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #158 9-3 · #18 |
— | — | ARK -14.0 | — | 75.3 | — | 94% ARK | › | |
| Half final | 5-6 · #176 8-3 · #131 |
— | — | UNI -6.7 | — | 61.5 | — | 77% UNI | › | |
| Half final | 2-9 · #255 8-4 · #167 |
— | — | BRAD -6.6 | — | 67.1 | — | 76% BRAD | › | |
| Half final | 1-10 · #360 7-5 · #46 |
— | — | MISS -15.6 | — | 68.8 | — | 96% MISS | › | |
| Half final | 5-6 · #224 11-1 · #51 |
— | — | LSU -12.3 | — | 74.0 | — | 91% LSU | › | |
| Half final | 1-7 · #343 9-3 · #28 |
— | — | TA&M -17.2 | — | 79.0 | — | 97% TA&M | › | |
| Half final | 0-12 · #366 9-3 · #31 |
— | — | OU -23.4 | — | 72.4 | — | 99% OU | › | |
| Half final | 5-6 · #249 5-6 · #235 |
— | — | MILW -1.2 | — | 74.9 | — | 55% MILW | › | |
| Half final | 2-9 · #202 11-1 · #45 |
— | — | OKST -12.0 | — | 76.5 | — | 90% OKST | › | |
| Half final | 1-11 · #280 9-3 · #40 |
— | — | TCU -16.1 | — | 67.5 | — | 96% TCU | › | |
| Half final | 10-3 · #203 7-3 · #150 |
— | — | UVU -3.6 | — | 67.8 | — | 65% UVU | › | |
| Half final | 5-4 · #185 6-4 · #257 |
— | — | UTA -0.6 | — | 65.7 | — | 53% UTA | › | |
| Half final | 3-8 · #276 3-6 · #287 |
— | — | RGV -3.1 | — | 72.2 | — | 63% RGV | › | |
| Half final | 2-8 · #285 1-6 · #238 |
— | — | AMCC -2.5 | — | 66.3 | — | 61% AMCC | › | |
| Half final | 4-7 · #201 12-0 · #5 |
— | — | ARIZ -17.8 | — | 72.9 | — | 97% ARIZ | › | |
| Half final | 9-3 · #116 5-6 · #144 |
— | — | ILST -1.6 | — | 67.3 | — | 57% ILST | › | |
| Half final | 0-9 · #356 7-5 · #70 |
— | — | MINN -14.6 | — | 66.0 | — | 94% MINN | › | |
| Half final | 1-9 · #267 4-7 · #268 |
— | — | UTU -4.4 | — | 71.2 | — | 68% UTU | › | |
| Half final | 4-7 · #175 8-4 · #21 |
— | — | AUB -14.3 | — | 81.1 | — | 94% AUB | › | |
| Half final | 8-4 · #73 8-4 · #56 |
— | — | WASH -6.0 | — | 74.7 | — | 74% WASH | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record