No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
34–33
✗ UVM lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
32–35
✓ UIW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.3
Projected
38–34
✓ OHIO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
37–29
✓ WYO won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
28–41
✓ NU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
29–41
✓ SC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
38–30
✓ ETSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
35–40
✗ TOL lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
33–41
✓ UNC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
36–36
✓ DAV won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
34–35
✗ CLT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.6
Projected
34–33
✓ HALL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.6
Projected
32–43
✓ WIS won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
32–37
✗ MIA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
35–37
✗ BGSU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
23–46
✓ TENN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
34–35
✗ EMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
36–36
✗ TNTC lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
25–43
✓ NEB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
40–34
✓ LOU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
34–35
✗ CSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.2
Projected
38–28
✓ SMC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
40–31
✓ USU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
35–35
✗ STAN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
35–38
✓ CREI won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
45–29
✓ GONZ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
32–35
✓ SEA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
40–33
✗ SCU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.5
Projected
35–33
✓ SF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.9
Projected
31–33
✗ LMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
37–31
✓ SDSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
33–35
✓ BOIS won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 6-6 · #186 2-11 · #135 |
— | — | UVM -1.1 | — | 66.5 | — | 55% UVM | › | |
| Half final | 3-8 · #252 3-6 · #289 |
— | — | UIW -3.5 | — | 66.6 | — | 65% UIW | › | |
| Half final | 4-7 · #128 2-9 · #270 |
— | — | OHIO -3.7 | — | 72.3 | — | 65% OHIO | › | |
| Half final | 8-3 · #122 3-9 · #220 |
— | — | WYO -7.9 | — | 66.5 | — | 81% WYO | › | |
| Half final | 6-5 · #197 7-5 · #59 |
— | — | NU -13.2 | — | 68.8 | — | 93% NU | › | |
| Half final | 1-10 · #301 8-4 · #79 |
— | — | SC -12.0 | — | 69.7 | — | 90% SC | › | |
| Half final | 6-5 · #173 0-10 · #339 |
— | — | ETSU -8.2 | — | 67.6 | — | 81% ETSU | › | |
| Half final | 5-6 · #187 4-6 · #157 |
— | — | TOL -5.1 | — | 74.8 | — | 71% TOL | › | |
| Half final | 7-6 · #81 12-1 · #44 |
— | — | UNC -7.1 | — | 73.8 | — | 78% UNC | › | |
| Half final | 6-5 · #107 7-4 · #115 |
— | — | DAV -0.4 | — | 71.3 | — | 52% DAV | › | |
| Half final | 7-5 · #111 5-7 · #141 |
— | — | CLT -0.3 | — | 68.8 | — | 51% CLT | › | |
| Half final | 11-2 · #67 5-8 · #42 |
— | — | HALL -0.8 | — | 66.6 | — | 54% HALL | › | |
| Half final | 6-6 · #235 8-4 · #41 |
— | — | WIS -10.9 | — | 74.6 | — | 88% WIS | › | |
| Half final | 7-6 · #74 11-2 · #25 |
— | — | MIA -5.2 | — | 69.3 | — | 71% MIA | › | |
| Half final | 10-0 · #125 7-3 · #200 |
— | — | BGSU -2.5 | — | 71.7 | — | 61% BGSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-13 · #353 9-3 · #7 |
— | — | TENN -23.2 | — | 68.8 | — | 99% TENN | › | |
| Half final | 8-4 · #209 5-7 · #188 |
— | — | EMU -0.0 | — | 68.9 | — | 50% EMU | › | |
| Half final | 4-5 · #245 3-7 · #282 |
— | — | TNTC -0.4 | — | 71.7 | — | 52% TNTC | › | |
| Half final | 2-8 · #286 12-0 · #27 |
— | — | NEB -17.9 | — | 67.2 | — | 97% NEB | › | |
| Half final | 10-2 · #14 11-1 · #92 |
— | — | LOU -5.9 | — | 73.3 | — | 74% LOU | › | |
| Half final | 9-3 · #96 8-3 · #87 |
— | — | CSU -1.1 | — | 68.7 | — | 55% CSU | › | |
| Half final | 11-2 · #97 3-9 · #172 |
— | — | SMC -9.9 | — | 66.2 | — | 86% SMC | › | |
| Half final | 9-1 · #58 5-6 · #174 |
— | — | USU -8.6 | — | 71.4 | — | 83% USU | › | |
| Half final | 9-4 · #71 11-2 · #85 |
— | — | STAN -0.3 | — | 69.5 | — | 51% STAN | › | |
| Half final | 10-3 · #72 8-5 · #37 |
— | — | CREI -2.4 | — | 72.7 | — | 60% CREI | › | |
| Half final | 13-1 · #17 5-7 · #146 |
— | — | GONZ -15.8 | — | 73.6 | — | 96% GONZ | › | |
| Half final | 5-8 · #139 9-3 · #119 |
— | — | SEA -2.5 | — | 67.3 | — | 61% SEA | › | |
| Half final | 9-4 · #106 5-7 · #169 |
— | — | SCU -7.7 | — | 73.2 | — | 80% SCU | › | |
| Half final | 8-5 · #161 7-7 · #99 |
— | — | SF -2.5 | — | 67.5 | — | 61% SF | › | |
| Half final | 7-5 · #163 8-5 · #121 |
— | — | LMU -2.4 | — | 63.9 | — | 60% LMU | › | |
| Half final | 6-4 · #75 4-7 · #143 |
— | — | SDSU -5.2 | — | 68.0 | — | 72% SDSU | › | |
| Half final | 9-2 · #82 7-3 · #86 |
— | — | BOIS -2.1 | — | 68.3 | — | 59% BOIS | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record