Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games144144 final · 0 to play
Lines moved971+ pt since the open · 144 with a line
Totals moved1171+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS59-8541% covered
Upsets51outright
Over / Under71-7349% over
Model Favorite90-5463% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
FLA @ VANVAN -2.5 → FLA -1.54 → FLA160.5 → 164.5▲ 4
SHSU @ FIUSHSU -1.5 → FIU -2.54 → FIU168.5 → 168.5no move
UNC @ CALUNC -3.5 → UNC -7.54 → UNC148.5 → 151.5▲ 3
SJU @ VILLVILL -1.5 → SJU -2.54 → SJU147.5 → 147.5no move
GONZ @ SEAGONZ -13.5 → GONZ -9.54 → SEA149.5 → 150.5▲ 1
MIZ @ LSULSU -4.5 → LSU -1.53 → MIZ155.5 → 148.5▼ 7
BYU @ TTUTTU -2.5 → TTU -2.5no move158.5 → 165.5▲ 7
EMU @ BGSUBGSU -8.5 → BGSU -11.53 → BGSU142.5 → 141.5▼ 1
SYR @ BCSYR -6.5 → SYR -5.51 → BC135.5 → 141.5▲ 6
SDAK @ UNDSDAK -1.5 → UND -1.53 → UND164.5 → 160.5▼ 4
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalConference
17-1 · #6 AP #3
64
9-8 · #64
62
Spread
CONN -11.5
✓ GTWN W ATS
Total
141.5
▼ Under 126
Projected
80–67
✓ CONN won
Model: CONN by 1.3 ✗ Model: Over 5.2 ✗
FinalConference
10-7 · #70
67
14-3 · #4 AP #13
77
Spread
ILL -15.5
✓ MINN W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲4
▲ Over 144
Projected
64–80
✓ ILL won
Model: ILL by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 1.6 ✓
FinalConference
15-2 · #20 AP #16
72
SMU
13-4 · #55
68
Spread
UVA -2.5
✓ UVA W ATS
Total
153.5
▼ Under 140
Projected
79–80
✗ SMU lost
Model: SMU by 3.7 ✗ Model: Over 5.6 ✗
FinalConference
11-6 · #19
80
12-5 · #7 AP #24
78
Spread
TENN -6.5
✓ UK W ATS
Total
145.5
▲ Over 158
Projected
74–77
✗ TENN lost
Model: UK by 3.4 ✓ Model: Over 4.8 ✓
FinalConference
10-7 · #72
77
14-3 · #67 AP #25
66
Spread
HALL -6.5
✓ BTLR W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲2
▼ Under 143
Projected
72–75
✗ HALL lost
Model: BTLR by 2.8 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗
FinalConference
10-7 · #71
76
13-5 · #68
89
Spread
VT -6.5
✓ VT W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲3
▲ Over 165
Projected
72–76
✓ VT won
Model: ND by 2.8 ✗ Model: Over 4.8 ✓
FinalConference
10-8 · #94
78
12-5 · #48
74
Spread
NCSU -17.5
✓ GT W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼1
▼ Under 152
Projected
69–85
✗ NCSU lost
Model: GT by 1.4 ✓
FinalConference
5-12 · #278
78
7-10 · #359
68
Spread
MSM -3.5
✓ MSM W ATS
Total
135.5 ▲1
▲ Over 146
Projected
69–66
✓ MSM won
Model: CAN by 0.2 ✗ Model: Under 0.2 ✗
FinalConference
Elon
9-7 · #232
89
11-5 · #166
85
Spread
HOF -5.5
✓ ELON W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼2
▲ Over 174
Projected
73–80
✗ HOF lost
Model: HOF by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 3.4 ✓
FinalConference
7-8 · #107
74
7-8 · #100
63
Spread
DUQ -1.5
✓ DUQ W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼2
▼ Under 137
Projected
76–76
✓ DUQ won
Model: FOR by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 5.7 ✗
FinalConference
12-5 · #15 AP #18
83
11-6 · #31
81
Spread
ALA -5.5
✓ OU W ATS
Total
177.5 ▲6
▼ Under 164
Projected
92–83
✓ ALA won
Model: ALA by 2.7 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓
FinalConference
UCLA
12-5 · #26
74
11-5 · #33
86
Spread
OSU -4.5
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼1
▲ Over 160
Projected
75–78
✓ OSU won
Model: UCLA by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 6.5 ✓
FinalConference
6-10 · #317
55
3-14 · #310
74
Spread
LAF -2.5
✓ LAF W ATS
Total
138.5 ▲1
▼ Under 129
Projected
70–71
✓ LAF won
Model: HC by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 2.1 ✗
FinalConference
6-11 · #261
57
3-13 · #314
74
Spread
BU -1.5
✓ L-MD W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼5
▼ Under 131
Projected
78–75
✗ BU lost
Model: BU by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 4.8 ✗
FinalConference
8-9 · #188
79
8-6 · #200
85
Spread
BGSU -11.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼1
▲ Over 164
Projected
68–75
✓ BGSU won
Model: EMU by 3.8 ✓ Model: Over 1.6 ✓
FinalConference
11-4 · #237
102
15-0 · #125
105
Spread
M-OH -10.5
✓ BUF W ATS
Total
162.5 ▲3
▲ Over 207
Projected
75–86
✓ M-OH won
Model: BUF by 0.2 ✓ Model: Under 1.7 ✗
FinalConference
3-9 · #354
74
4-10 · #355
80
Spread
NHVN -1.5
✓ NHVN W ATS
Total
129.5 ▲1
▲ Over 154
Projected
65–68
✓ NHVN won
Model: NHVN by 1.9 ✓ Model: Over 3.7 ✓
FinalConference
5-10 · #227
90
4-10 · #215
82
Spread
WCU -1.5
✓ UTC W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲2
▲ Over 172
Projected
75–77
✗ WCU lost
Model: WCU by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 2.0 ✓
FinalConference
4-14 · #234
75
9-8 · #259
73
Spread
APP -7.5
✓ ODU W ATS
Total
140.5 ▲1
▲ Over 148
Projected
68–72
✗ APP lost
Model: ODU by 3.1 ✓ Model: Under 1.0 ✗
FinalConference
16-1 · #13 AP #2
70
9-8 · #30
79
Spread
ISU -5.5
✓ CIN W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲3
▲ Over 149
Projected
75–67
✗ ISU lost
Model: ISU by 2.5 ✗
FinalConference
12-5 · #1 AP #19
98
16-1 · #22 AP #10
94
Spread
FLA -1.5
✓ FLA W ATS
Total
164.5 ▲4
▲ Over 192
Projected
84–81
✓ FLA won
Model: FLA by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 0.2 ✓
FinalConference
12-6 · #167
62
11-6 · #116
88
Spread
ILST -5.5
✓ ILST W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 150
Projected
72–76
✓ ILST won
Model: BRAD by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 0.4 ✓
FinalConference
6-12 · #299
76
8-8 · #211
95
Spread
COLG -8.5
✓ COLG W ATS
Total
139.5
▲ Over 171
Projected
67–75
✓ COLG won
Model: COLG by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.6 ✓
FinalConference
TCU
11-6 · #40
79
Utah
8-9 · #73
82
Spread
TCU -4.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲2
▲ Over 161
Projected
80–75
✗ TCU lost
Model: TCU by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
FinalConference
9-8 · #62
87
12-5 · #41
96
Spread
WIS -15.5
✓ RUTG W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲1
▲ Over 183
Projected
69–84
✓ WIS won
Model: RUTG by 1.4 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓
FinalConference
Iowa
12-5 · #43
74
12-5 · #38
57
Spread
IU -3.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲4
▼ Under 131
Projected
74–75
✗ IU lost
Model: IOWA by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.3 ✗
FinalConference
9-8 · #205
69
5-11 · #271
67
Spread
WIN -5.5
✓ UNCA W ATS
Total
152.5
▼ Under 136
Projected
80–75
✓ WIN won
Model: UNCA by 1.0 ✓ Model: Over 2.0 ✗
FinalConference
6-10 · #183
92
0-16 · #348
55
Spread
PRES -8.5
✓ PRES W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼2
▲ Over 147
Projected
76–69
✓ PRES won
Model: GWEB by 1.1 ✗ Model: Under 0.6 ✗
FinalConference
1-14 · #347
58
8-6 · #269
69
Spread
SPU -10.5
✓ SPU W ATS
Total
134.5 ▲1
▼ Under 127
Projected
62–72
✓ SPU won
Model: RID by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 0.1 ✗
FinalConference
12-5 · #63
73
7-10 · #95
81
Spread
SYR -5.5
✓ BC W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲6
▲ Over 154
Projected
74–68
✗ SYR lost
Model: SYR by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 0.1 ✓
FinalConference
Navy
10-6 · #199
82
5-11 · #216
79
Spread
NAVY -3.5
✓ LEH W ATS
Total
137.5 ▲1
▲ Over 161
Projected
73–70
✓ NAVY won
Model: NAVY by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 5.1 ✓
FinalConference
10-4 · #170
80
4-9 · #156
86
Spread
COLU -2.5
✓ BRWN W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲5
▲ Over 166
Projected
74–70
✗ COLU lost
Model: COLU by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 0.6 ✓
FinalConference
12-4 · #212
65
12-5 · #213
68
Spread
NDSU -2.5
✓ NDSU W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲1
▼ Under 133
Projected
76–78
✓ NDSU won
Model: STMN by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 2.7 ✗
FinalConference
7-9 · #291
80
6-12 · #336
96
Spread
UND -1.5
✓ UND W ATS
Total
160.5 ▼4
▲ Over 176
Projected
83–84
✓ UND won
Model: SDAK by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 6.0 ✓
FinalConference
5-8 · #179
68
Yale
10-3 · #126
102
Spread
YALE -9.5
✓ YALE W ATS
Total
174.5 ▼3
▼ Under 170
Projected
83–93
✓ YALE won
Model: YALE by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 1.8 ✗
FinalConference
6-10 · #265
78
2-14 · #315
80
Spread
YSU -8.5
✓ CLE W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼5
▲ Over 158
Projected
81–74
✗ YSU lost
Model: CLE by 2.0 ✓ Model: Over 2.6 ✓
FinalConference
5-10 · #277
80
3-15 · #340
77
Spread
IUIN -1.5
✓ DETM W ATS
Total
169.5
▼ Under 157
Projected
87–86
✓ DETM won
Model: DETM by 2.8 ✓ Model: Over 3.0 ✗
FinalConference
6-9 · #187
89
11-4 · #118
104
Spread
AKR -21.5
✓ WMU W ATS
Total
163.5 ▼5
▲ Over 193
Projected
76–93
✓ AKR won
Model: WMU by 4.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.6 ✓
FinalConference
10-7 · #239
67
10-5 · #236
82
Spread
MRST -8.5
✓ MRST W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲1
▲ Over 149
Projected
64–74
✓ MRST won
Model: MRST by 1.6 ✓ Model: Under 2.7 ✗
FinalConference
11-7 · #260
74
7-11 · #330
59
Spread
SIE -6.5
✓ SIE W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼1
▼ Under 133
Projected
79–72
✓ SIE won
Model: SIE by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 5.6 ✗
FinalConference
5-11 · #135
80
7-8 · #136
87
Spread
HARV -4.5
✓ HARV W ATS
Total
133.5 ▲3
▲ Over 167
Projected
64–71
✓ HARV won
Model: HARV by 2.2 ✓ Model: Over 0.9 ✓
FinalConference
3-12 · #349
62
5-10 · #331
57
Spread
MERC -4.5
✓ STO W ATS
Total
128.5
▼ Under 119
Projected
62–68
✗ MERC lost
Model: MERC by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 1.8 ✗
FinalConference
7-6 · #337
98
90
Spread
CCSU -6.5
✓ CCSU W ATS
Total
144.5
▲ Over 188
Projected
76–68
✓ CCSU won
Model: CCSU by 1.4 ✓ Model: Under 0.8 ✗
FinalConference
6-10 · #332
72
1-15 · #362
57
Spread
LEM -6.5
✓ LEM W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼1
▼ Under 129
Projected
77–74
✓ LEM won
Model: CHST by 4.0 ✗ Model: Over 4.7 ✗
FinalConference
ETSU
10-6 · #173
76
7-9 · #184
75
Spread
ETSU -3.5
✓ SAM W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼1
▲ Over 151
Projected
77–73
✓ ETSU won
Model: ETSU by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 0.8 ✓
FinalConference
7-8 · #298
72
FGCU
5-11 · #266
90
Spread
FGCU -9.5
✓ FGCU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼6
▲ Over 162
Projected
75–84
✓ FGCU won
Model: WGA by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 6.5 ✓
FinalConference
87
5-11 · #303
81
Spread
QUC -10.5
✓ STET W ATS
Total
162.5 ▼2
▲ Over 168
Projected
85–77
✓ QUC won
Model: STET by 2.1 ✓ Model: Under 0.1 ✗
FinalConference
1-15 · #333
69
6-10 · #240
98
Spread
CARK -12.5
✓ CARK W ATS
Total
164.5
▲ Over 167
Projected
78–87
✓ CARK won
Model: UNF by 2.8 ✗ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
7-7 · #189
76
FIU
6-8 · #178
63
Spread
FIU -2.5
✓ SHSU W ATS
Total
168.5
▼ Under 139
Projected
82–83
✗ FIU lost
Model: SHSU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✓
FinalConference
6-7 · #133
97
5-11 · #206
68
Spread
NMSU -4.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
134.5 ▼1
▲ Over 165
Projected
72–66
✓ NMSU won
Model: NMSU by 1.9 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓
FinalConference
15-2 · #25
59
15-3 · #35 AP #22
69
Spread
CLEM -4.5
✓ CLEM W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼2
▼ Under 128
Projected
73–76
✓ CLEM won
Model: MIA by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 5.7 ✗
FinalConference
14-1 · #58 AP #23
74
10-6 · #80
84
Spread
USU -5.5
✓ GCU W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲5
▲ Over 158
Projected
78–71
✗ USU lost
Model: USU by 0.8 ✗ Model: Under 1.8 ✗
FinalConference
10-6 · #142
74
4-13 · #124
78
Spread
SBU -5.5
✓ LAS W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼4
▲ Over 152
Projected
72–71
✗ SBU lost
Model: LAS by 3.9 ✓ Model: Over 1.8 ✓
FinalConference
7-9 · #218
83
7-9 · #246
85
Spread
RAD -4.5
✓ LONG W ATS
Total
157.5 ▼1
▲ Over 168
Projected
78–82
✓ RAD won
Model: LONG by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✓
FinalConference
11-6 · #131
44
7-10 · #176
54
Spread
UNI -1.5
✓ VAL W ATS
Total
130.5
▼ Under 98
Projected
66–63
✗ UNI lost
Model: UNI by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.8 ✓
FinalConference
7-9 · #144
67
UIC
6-10 · #110
74
Spread
UIC -5.5
✓ UIC W ATS
Total
139.5 ▲1
▲ Over 141
Projected
71–73
✓ UIC won
Model: DRKE by 3.1 ✗ Model: Over 3.9 ✓
FinalConference
11-6 · #241
71
10-8 · #225
83
Spread
QUIN -1.5
✓ MRMK W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲3
▲ Over 154
Projected
72–70
✗ QUIN lost
Model: QUIN by 0.3 ✗ Model: Under 0.3 ✗
FinalConference
10-7 · #209
68
3-11 · #334
70
Spread
MASS -8.5
✓ NIU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲3
▼ Under 138
Projected
82–74
✗ MASS lost
Model: NIU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 2.1 ✓
FinalConference
Penn
7-7 · #137
84
6-7 · #251
74
Spread
DART -2.5
✓ PENN W ATS
Total
163.5 ▲2
▼ Under 158
Projected
78–80
✗ DART lost
Model: PENN by 0.1 ✓ Model: Under 6.1 ✓
FinalConference
9-9 · #283
79
11-6 · #296
75
Spread
GASO -6.5
✓ CCU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲1
▼ Under 154
Projected
77–82
✗ GASO lost
Model: CCU by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 0.8 ✗
FinalConference
4-12 · #223
90
4-10 · #292
68
Spread
UNA -1.5
✓ JAX W ATS
Total
133.5 ▼2
▲ Over 158
Projected
68–71
✗ UNA lost
Model: UNA by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 4.8 ✓
FinalConference
8-6 · #148
81
9-6 · #129
65
Spread
WKU -7.5
✓ KENN W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲2
▼ Under 146
Projected
82–85
✗ WKU lost
Model: KENN by 4.3 ✓ Model: Over 1.6 ✗
FinalConference
UTEP
3-11 · #190
69
11-3 · #160
80
Spread
LIB -13.5
✓ UTEP W ATS
Total
137.5
▲ Over 149
Projected
64–75
✓ LIB won
Model: UTEP by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 1.4 ✓
FinalConference
4-12 · #208
77
1-15 · #358
57
Spread
GAST -6.5
✓ GAST W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲2
▼ Under 134
Projected
80–75
✓ GAST won
Model: ULM by 2.1 ✗ Model: Under 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
13-4 · #54
70
LSU
12-5 · #51
78
Spread
LSU -1.5
✓ LSU W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼7
▼ Under 148
Projected
76–81
✓ LSU won
Model: LSU by 2.9 ✓ Model: Over 8.2 ✗
FinalConference
17-0 · #5 AP #1
84
UCF
14-2 · #39
77
Spread
ARIZ -9.5
✓ UCF W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲2
▼ Under 161
Projected
88–77
✓ ARIZ won
Model: ARIZ by 1.1 ✗ Model: Under 0.9 ✓
FinalConference
15-1 · #8 AP #4
81
8-9 · #57
71
Spread
MICH -18.5
✓ ORE W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲5
▼ Under 152
Projected
89–71
✓ MICH won
Model: ORE by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 1.7 ✗
FinalConference
17-0 · #27 AP #8
77
8-9 · #59
58
Spread
NEB -4.5
✓ NEB W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲1
▼ Under 135
Projected
76–72
✓ NEB won
Model: NU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.3 ✓
FinalConference
14-3 · #44 AP #14
78
12-5 · #92
84
Spread
UNC -7.5
✓ CAL W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲3
▲ Over 162
Projected
78–72
✗ UNC lost
Model: CAL by 2.0 ✓ Model: Under 1.9 ✗
FinalConference
13-4 · #18 AP #17
76
14-3 · #34 AP #21
90
Spread
UGA -2.5
✓ UGA W ATS
Total
181.5 ▲2
▼ Under 166
Projected
89–92
✓ UGA won
Model: UGA by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.9 ✓
FinalConference
7-9 · #207
81
15-3 · #132
85
Spread
MUR -11.5
✓ INST W ATS
Total
167.5 ▲5
▼ Under 166
Projected
78–88
✓ MUR won
Model: INST by 1.3 ✓ Model: Under 0.9 ✓
FinalConference
1-12 · #322
72
2-13 · #360
71
Spread
TXSO -1.5
✓ ALCN W ATS
Total
146.5
▼ Under 143
Projected
77–76
✓ TXSO won
Model: ALCN by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 6.2 ✗
FinalConference
12-5 · #104
63
15-1 · #69
88
Spread
SLU -14.5
✓ SLU W ATS
Total
162.5 ▲3
▼ Under 151
Projected
73–86
✓ SLU won
Model: RICH by 1.7 ✗ Model: Under 2.9 ✓
FinalConference
4-9 · #343
78
3-13 · #280
82
Spread
JKST -1.5
✓ JKST W ATS
Total
160.5 ▼2
▼ Under 160
Projected
79–81
✓ JKST won
Model: PV by 0.4 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓
FinalConference
12-5 · #96
81
3-14 · #220
66
Spread
NEV -14.5
✓ NEV W ATS
Total
134.5 ▼1
▲ Over 147
Projected
76–60
✓ NEV won
Model: NEV by 1.4 ✓ Model: Over 0.8 ✓
FinalConference
10-7 · #117
106
8-9 · #191
112
Spread
COFC -4.5
✓ STBK W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲3
▲ Over 218
Projected
73–69
✗ COFC lost
Model: STBK by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 0.2 ✓
FinalConference
8-7 · #242
102
5-11 · #284
92
Spread
MER -5.5
✓ MER W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼3
▲ Over 194
Projected
81–75
✓ MER won
Model: MER by 0.1 ✓ Model: Over 1.0 ✓
FinalConference
11-5 · #123
83
6-11 · #329
62
Spread
UCSD -8.5
✓ UCSD W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼5
▼ Under 145
Projected
80–70
✓ UCSD won
Model: UCSD by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 2.7 ✗
FinalConference
7-8 · #293
90
7-9 · #285
80
Spread
NICH -3.5
✓ LAM W ATS
Total
139.5
▲ Over 170
Projected
69–71
✗ NICH lost
Model: LAM by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
FinalConference
4-15 · #221
59
11-5 · #228
56
Spread
USA -9.5
✓ UL W ATS
Total
129.5 ▲3
▼ Under 115
Projected
60–71
✗ USA lost
Model: USA by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 0.9 ✗
FinalConference
8-9 · #158
72
10-7 · #231
77
Spread
MRSH -6.5
✓ JMU W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼3
▼ Under 149
Projected
74–79
✓ MRSH won
Model: JMU by 2.1 ✓ Model: Over 3.4 ✗
FinalConference
5-10 · #350
76
4-11 · #282
70
Spread
TNTC -1.5
✓ MORE W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼1
▲ Over 146
Projected
73–74
✗ TNTC lost
Model: TNTC by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 5.5 ✓
FinalConference
1-14 · #365
79
6-10 · #222
86
Spread
LR -10.5
✓ WIU W ATS
Total
135.5
▲ Over 165
Projected
64–73
✓ LR won
Model: WIU by 1.4 ✓ Model: Over 0.6 ✓
FinalConference
10-5 · #257
74
11-4 · #150
86
Spread
UVU -11.5
✓ UVU W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲1
▲ Over 160
Projected
66–74
✓ UVU won
Model: UTA by 3.3 ✗ Model: Under 3.2 ✗
FinalConference
7-8 · #197
83
3-11 · #357
69
Spread
HOW -2.5
✓ HOW W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲2
▲ Over 152
Projected
73–72
✓ HOW won
Model: NCCU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 2.9 ✓
FinalConference
4-12 · #319
89
2-15 · #353
82
Spread
NORF -5.5
✓ NORF W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼1
▲ Over 171
Projected
75–69
✓ NORF won
Model: NORF by 0.2 ✓ Model: Over 4.1 ✓
FinalConference
2-13 · #345
80
2-12 · #351
79
Spread
DSU -3.5
✓ MORG W ATS
Total
136.5
▲ Over 159
Projected
69–74
✗ DSU lost
Model: DSU by 1.6 ✗ Model: Over 6.3 ✓
FinalConference
2-17 · #352
67
5-13 · #364
70
Spread
UMES -10.5
✓ COPP W ATS
Total
133.5 ▼1
▲ Over 137
Projected
62–75
✓ UMES won
Model: UMES by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✓
FinalConference
4-12 · #252
56
5-8 · #238
68
Spread
AMCC -5.5
✓ AMCC W ATS
Total
130.5 ▼3
▼ Under 124
Projected
64–69
✓ AMCC won
Model: SELA by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 2.6 ✗
FinalConference
5-11 · #342
70
3-12 · #300
81
Spread
HCU -2.5
✓ HCU W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼3
▲ Over 151
Projected
68–73
✓ HCU won
Model: HCU by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 1.4 ✓
FinalConference
10-6 · #171
74
Troy
10-6 · #147
99
Spread
TROY -3.5
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲2
▲ Over 173
Projected
83–86
✓ TROY won
Model: ARST by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 3.0 ✓
FinalConference
9-8 · #224
67
8-9 · #103
74
Spread
TXST -2.5
✓ TXST W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼2
▲ Over 141
Projected
72–73
✓ TXST won
Model: USM by 1.6 ✗ Model: Over 4.1 ✓
FinalConference
67
8-6 · #245
73
Spread
TNST -8.5
✓ USI W ATS
Total
150.5
▼ Under 140
Projected
72–81
✓ TNST won
Model: TNST by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✗
FinalConference
8-7 · #258
55
11-4 · #341
69
Spread
UTM -2.5
✓ UTM W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲3
▼ Under 124
Projected
72–75
✓ UTM won
Model: UTM by 1.0 ✓ Model: Under 1.0 ✓
FinalConference
SIUE
7-8 · #256
68
6-9 · #306
55
Spread
SEMO -9.5
✓ SIUE W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼1
▼ Under 123
Projected
69–75
✗ SEMO lost
Model: SIUE by 3.0 ✓ Model: Over 4.0 ✗
FinalConference
UNLV
7-8 · #98
76
5-11 · #143
62
Spread
UNLV -7.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼6
▼ Under 138
Projected
78–76
✓ UNLV won
Model: SJSU by 5.3 ✗ Model: Over 7.5 ✗
FinalConference
3-11 · #309
71
6-9 · #338
53
Spread
GRAM -1.5
✓ SOU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲1
▼ Under 124
Projected
74–76
✗ GRAM lost
Model: GRAM by 0.6 ✗ Model: Under 2.8 ✓
FinalConference
9-7 · #248
74
10-5 · #152
70
Spread
FUR -4.5
✓ WOF W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼4
▼ Under 144
Projected
72–78
✗ FUR lost
Model: FUR by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 0.1 ✗
FinalConference
10-6 · #149
72
8-7 · #182
75
Spread
UCI -3.5
✓ UCD W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲2
▼ Under 147
Projected
72–71
✗ UCI lost
Model: UCD by 2.3 ✓ Model: Under 4.8 ✓
FinalConference
4-11 · #318
74
5-9 · #289
76
Spread
UIW -8.5
✓ NWST W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲1
▲ Over 150
Projected
68–76
✓ UIW won
Model: NWST by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 2.7 ✓
FinalConference
3-12 · #321
52
7-5 · #274
63
Spread
PRST -11.5
✓ NAU W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼1
▼ Under 115
Projected
67–77
✓ PRST won
Model: NAU by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 3.3 ✗
FinalConference
7-7 · #244
60
5-9 · #198
64
Spread
JXST -4.5
✓ LT W ATS
Total
127.5 ▲3
▼ Under 124
Projected
62–65
✓ JXST won
Model: LT by 1.8 ✓ Model: Under 1.1 ✓
FinalConference
1-15 · #335
62
6-10 · #201
90
Spread
SDST -13.5
✓ SDST W ATS
Total
151.5
▲ Over 152
Projected
69–82
✓ SDST won
Model: KC by 0.8 ✗ Model: Under 1.1 ✗
FinalConference
12-3 · #127
76
4-11 · #287
79
Spread
MCN -9.5
✓ RGV W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲2
▲ Over 155
Projected
78–68
✗ MCN lost
Model: MCN by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.1 ✓
FinalConference
16-1 · #23 AP #5
69
USC
13-3 · #36
64
Spread
PUR -9.5
✓ USC W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲1
▼ Under 133
Projected
86–75
✓ PUR won
Model: PUR by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 5.3 ✗
FinalConference
Duke
16-1 · #3 AP #6
80
14-4 · #85
50
Spread
DUKE -11.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
148.5
▼ Under 130
Projected
81–67
✓ DUKE won
Model: DUKE by 2.0 ✓ Model: Under 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
15-2 · #10 AP #12
80
10-7 · #56
63
Spread
MSU -3.5
✓ MSU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲6
▼ Under 143
Projected
74–71
✓ MSU won
Model: MSU by 0.1 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓
FinalConference
10-8 · #163
81
10-10 · #99
64
Spread
ORST -1.5
✓ PAC W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼1
▲ Over 145
Projected
72–72
✓ PAC won
Model: PAC by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓
FinalConference
12-5 · #65
61
11-6 · #47
72
Spread
WVU -6.5
✓ WVU W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼4
▼ Under 133
Projected
71–76
✓ WVU won
Model: COLO by 2.0 ✗ Model: Over 5.8 ✗
FinalConference
10-7 · #89
69
7-10 · #81
68
Spread
WAKE -1.5
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
168.5 ▲2
▼ Under 137
Projected
83–82
✓ WAKE won
Model: WAKE by 0.1 ✗ Model: Under 3.8 ✓
FinalConference
12-3 · #193
84
6-11 · #276
79
Spread
SFA -6.5
✓ NOLA W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 163
Projected
77–72
✓ SFA won
Model: NOLA by 1.2 ✓ Model: Over 2.0 ✓
FinalConference
2-14 · #254
84
7-8 · #344
66
Spread
IDST -6.5
✓ EWU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼2
▼ Under 150
Projected
75–81
✗ IDST lost
Model: EWU by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 3.8 ✗
FinalConference
13-4 · #28
74
10-6 · #11
70
Spread
TEX -4.5
✓ TA&M W ATS
Total
166.5 ▲2
▼ Under 144
Projected
84–87
✗ TEX lost
Model: TA&M by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 4.1 ✗
FinalConference
10-7 · #79
67
10-7 · #21
71
Spread
AUB -13.5
✓ SC W ATS
Total
152.5
▼ Under 138
Projected
73–86
✓ AUB won
Model: SC by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 6.1 ✗
FinalConference
7-7 · #250
87
MTSU
7-7 · #154
90
Spread
MTSU -5.5
✓ MOST W ATS
Total
137.5
▲ Over 177
Projected
66–74
✓ MTSU won
Model: MTSU by 2.6 ✗ Model: Over 1.6 ✓
FinalConference
3-9 · #327
71
4-11 · #363
67
Spread
UAPB -2.5
✓ FAMU W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼4
▼ Under 138
Projected
78–79
✗ UAPB lost
Model: FAMU by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 7.4 ✗
FinalConference
4-11 · #202
79
0-17 · #366
63
Spread
BCU -16.5
✓ MVSU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲1
▼ Under 142
Projected
81–67
✓ BCU won
Model: MVSU by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗
FinalConference
15-3 · #138
73
7-10 · #195
68
Spread
BEL -3.5
✓ BEL W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼4
▼ Under 141
Projected
79–77
✓ BEL won
Model: SIU by 1.9 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 ✗
FinalConference
16-2 · #97
54
14-5 · #106
62
Spread
SCU -1.5
✓ SCU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼4
▼ Under 116
Projected
75–77
✓ SCU won
Model: SCU by 0.3 ✓ Model: Under 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
10-6 · #122
60
7-9 · #174
63
Spread
WYO -3.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼1
▼ Under 123
Projected
75–72
✗ WYO lost
Model: Over 1.5 ✗
FinalConference
6-10 · #325
69
13-4 · #90
89
Spread
HPU -16.5
✓ HPU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲1
▲ Over 158
Projected
72–88
✓ HPU won
Model: UPST by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 7.1 ✓
FinalConference
9-8 · #168
92
11-6 · #230
89
Spread
NKU -7.5
✓ RMU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲1
▲ Over 181
Projected
74–80
✗ NKU lost
Model: RMU by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
10-7 · #324
66
FDU
2-12 · #356
59
Spread
LIU -7.5
✓ FDU W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼4
▼ Under 125
Projected
76–71
✓ LIU won
Model: FDU by 2.1 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗
FinalConference
7-9 · #243
75
14-2 · #120
78
Spread
UNCW -6.5
✓ CAM W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼2
▲ Over 153
Projected
72–78
✓ UNCW won
Model: CAM by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
1-14 · #339
82
VMI
3-12 · #320
68
Spread
VMI -6.5
✓ CIT W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲1
▲ Over 150
Projected
70–76
✗ VMI lost
Model: CIT by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.3 ✓
FinalConference
4-11 · #295
69
4-12 · #294
89
Spread
EKU -5.5
✓ EKU W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲1
▲ Over 158
Projected
78–81
✓ EKU won
Model: BELL by 2.3 ✗ Model: Over 2.3 ✓
FinalConference
9-5 · #210
78
9-7 · #214
82
Spread
LIP -2.5
✓ LIP W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲4
▲ Over 160
Projected
73–76
✓ LIP won
Model: LIP by 0.8 ✓ Model: Under 6.0 ✗
FinalConference
BYU
16-1 · #24 AP #11
71
13-4 · #12 AP #15
84
Spread
TTU -2.5
✓ TTU W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲7
▼ Under 155
Projected
79–79
✗ BYU lost
Model: BYU by 2.8 ✗ Model: Under 7.0 ✓
FinalConference
12-5 · #14 AP #20
100
Pitt
8-9 · #74
59
Spread
LOU -7.5
✓ LOU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲1
▲ Over 159
Projected
80–72
✓ LOU won
Model: LOU by 0.8 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗
FinalConference
13-3 · #82
79
11-4 · #75
83
Spread
SDSU -5.5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲4
▲ Over 162
Projected
74–76
✓ SDSU won
Model: UNM by 4.1 ✓ Model: Over 1.8 ✓
FinalConference
5-11 · #297
87
9-8 · #194
80
Spread
CSUN -7.5
✓ LBSU W ATS
Total
158.5 ▼2
▲ Over 167
Projected
77–83
✗ CSUN lost
Model: LBSU by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✓
FinalConference
6-11 · #312
72
4-12 · #281
81
Spread
CSUF -3.5
✓ UCR W ATS
Total
157.5
▼ Under 153
Projected
79–80
✓ UCR won
Model: UCR by 3.7 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✗
FinalConference
12-5 · #9
86
14-3 · #32
79
Spread
SJU -2.5
✓ SJU W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 165
Projected
77–73
✓ SJU won
Model: SJU by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 1.7 ✓
FinalConference
4-11 · #279
73
2-14 · #305
62
Spread
ORU -1.5
✓ OMA W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲1
▼ Under 135
Projected
77–77
✓ OMA won
Model: OMA by 1.4 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗
FinalConference
10-7 · #46
68
10-7 · #53
67
Spread
MSST -3.5
✓ MISS W ATS
Total
147.5
▼ Under 135
Projected
75–77
✗ MSST lost
Model: MISS by 1.2 ✓ Model: Over 5.0 ✗
FinalConference
7-8 · #253
52
2-13 · #267
74
Spread
ACU -3.5
✓ SUU W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲2
▼ Under 126
Projected
75–72
✗ ACU lost
Model: SUU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 3.1 ✓
FinalConference
7-11 · #169
71
LMU
10-9 · #121
58
Spread
LMU -8.5
✓ PORT W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲2
▼ Under 129
Projected
71–78
✗ LMU lost
Model: PORT by 1.1 ✓
FinalConference
11-3 · #140
62
8-7 · #134
77
Spread
HAW -2.5
✓ UCSB W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼1
▼ Under 139
Projected
75–70
✗ HAW lost
Model: HAW by 3.1 ✗ Model: Over 1.3 ✗
FinalConference
6-7 · #273
67
6-8 · #162
76
Spread
MTST -5.5
✓ MTST W ATS
Total
150.5
▼ Under 143
Projected
73–78
✓ MTST won
Model: MONT by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.1 ✗
FinalConference
7-7 · #247
75
8-8 · #313
67
Spread
IDHO -1.5
✓ IDHO W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲3
▼ Under 142
Projected
77–79
✗ WEB lost
Model: WEB by 3.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.1 ✓
FinalConference
7-7 · #185
71
6-10 · #268
75
Spread
UTU -3.5
✓ UTU W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼4
▼ Under 146
Projected
78–77
✗ TAR lost
Model: TAR by 4.4 ✗ Model: Over 5.2 ✗
FinalConference
18-1 · #17 AP #9
71
11-6 · #119
50
Spread
GONZ -9.5
✓ GONZ W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲1
▼ Under 121
Projected
84–66
✓ GONZ won
Model: GONZ by 8.3 ✓ Model: Under 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
9-8 · #83
83
13-4 · #45
84
Spread
OKST -2.5
✓ KSU W ATS
Total
175.5 ▼2
▼ Under 167
Projected
85–89
✓ OKST won
Model: OKST by 1.6 ✗ Model: Under 2.4 ✓
FinalConference
8-7 · #219
89
2-11 · #196
93
Spread
UNCO -6.5
✓ SAC W ATS
Total
163.5 ▲2
▲ Over 182
Projected
84–80
✗ UNCO lost
Model: SAC by 2.9 ✓
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
17-1 · #6
64
9-8 · #64
62
CONN -11.5 141.5 CONN -12.8 CONN +1.3 146.7 Over 5.2 87% CONN L L ›
Final
10-7 · #70
67
14-3 · #4
77
ILL -15.5 142.5 ILL -15.9 ILL +0.4 144.1 Over 1.6 92% ILL L W ›
Final
15-2 · #20
72
13-4 · #55
68
UVA -2.5 153.5 SMU -1.2 SMU +3.7 159.1 Over 5.6 54% SMU L L ›
Final
11-6 · #19
80
12-5 · #7
78
TENN -6.5 145.5 TENN -3.1 UK +3.4 150.3 Over 4.8 61% TENN W W ›
Final
10-7 · #72
77
14-3 · #67
66
HALL -6.5 144.5 HALL -3.7 BTLR +2.8 147.0 Over 2.5 63% HALL W L ›
Final
10-7 · #71
76
13-5 · #68
89
VT -6.5 143.5 VT -3.7 ND +2.8 148.3 Over 4.8 63% VT L W ›
Final
10-8 · #94
78
12-5 · #48
74
NCSU -17.5 154.5 NCSU -16.1 GT +1.4 154.5 — 92% NCSU W ›
Final
5-12 · #278
78
7-10 · #359
68
MSM -3.5 135.5 MSM -3.3 CAN +0.2 135.3 Under 0.2 61% MSM L L ›
Final
9-7 · #232
89
11-5 · #166
85
HOF -5.5 149.5 HOF -6.9 HOF +1.4 152.9 Over 3.4 73% HOF L W ›
Final
7-8 · #107
74
7-8 · #100
63
DUQ -1.5 145.5 FOR -0.0 FOR +1.5 151.2 Over 5.7 50% FOR L L ›
Final
12-5 · #15
83
11-6 · #31
81
ALA -5.5 177.5 ALA -8.2 ALA +2.7 175.0 Under 2.5 76% ALA L W ›
Final
12-5 · #26
74
11-5 · #33
86
OSU -4.5 146.5 OSU -2.7 UCLA +1.8 153.0 Over 6.5 59% OSU L W ›
Final
6-10 · #317
55
3-14 · #310
74
LAF -2.5 138.5 LAF -1.5 HC +1.0 140.6 Over 2.1 55% LAF L L ›
Final
6-11 · #261
57
3-13 · #314
74
BU -1.5 148.5 BU -2.5 BU +1.0 153.3 Over 4.8 59% BU L L ›
Final
8-9 · #188
79
8-6 · #200
85
BGSU -11.5 141.5 BGSU -7.7 EMU +3.8 143.1 Over 1.6 75% BGSU W W ›
Final
11-4 · #237
102
15-0 · #125
105
M-OH -10.5 162.5 M-OH -10.3 BUF +0.2 160.8 Under 1.7 82% M-OH W L ›
Final
3-9 · #354
74
4-10 · #355
80
NHVN -1.5 129.5 NHVN -3.4 NHVN +1.9 133.2 Over 3.7 62% NHVN W W ›
Final
5-10 · #227
90
4-10 · #215
82
WCU -1.5 150.5 WCU -1.7 WCU +0.2 152.5 Over 2.0 56% WCU L W ›
Final
4-14 · #234
75
9-8 · #259
73
APP -7.5 140.5 APP -4.4 ODU +3.1 139.5 Under 1.0 65% APP W L ›
Final
16-1 · #13
70
9-8 · #30
79
ISU -5.5 141.5 ISU -8.0 ISU +2.5 141.5 — 76% ISU L ›
Final
12-5 · #1
98
16-1 · #22
94
FLA -1.5 164.5 FLA -3.3 FLA +1.8 164.7 Over 0.2 61% FLA W W ›
Final
12-6 · #167
62
11-6 · #116
88
ILST -5.5 147.5 ILST -4.8 BRAD +0.8 147.9 Over 0.4 66% ILST L W ›
Final
6-12 · #299
76
8-8 · #211
95
COLG -8.5 139.5 COLG -8.8 COLG +0.3 142.1 Over 2.6 78% COLG W W ›
Final
11-6 · #40
79
8-9 · #73
82
TCU -4.5 154.5 TCU -5.3 TCU +0.8 155.0 Over 0.5 68% TCU L W ›
Final
9-8 · #62
87
12-5 · #41
96
WIS -15.5 149.5 WIS -14.1 RUTG +1.4 153.0 Over 3.5 89% WIS W W ›
Final
12-5 · #43
74
12-5 · #38
57
IU -3.5 146.5 IU -1.2 IOWA +2.3 148.8 Over 2.3 54% IU W L ›
Final
9-8 · #205
69
5-11 · #271
67
WIN -5.5 152.5 WIN -4.5 UNCA +1.0 154.5 Over 2.0 65% WIN W L ›
Final
6-10 · #183
92
0-16 · #348
55
PRES -8.5 145.5 PRES -7.4 GWEB +1.1 144.9 Under 0.6 74% PRES L L ›
Final
1-14 · #347
58
8-6 · #269
69
SPU -10.5 134.5 SPU -9.9 RID +0.6 134.6 Over 0.1 81% SPU L L ›
Final
12-5 · #63
73
7-10 · #95
81
SYR -5.5 141.5 SYR -5.7 SYR +0.2 141.6 Over 0.1 69% SYR L W ›
Final
10-6 · #199
82
5-11 · #216
79
NAVY -3.5 137.5 NAVY -3.6 NAVY +0.1 142.6 Over 5.1 62% NAVY L W ›
Final
10-4 · #170
80
4-9 · #156
86
COLU -2.5 143.5 COLU -3.6 COLU +1.1 144.1 Over 0.6 62% COLU L W ›
Final
12-4 · #212
65
12-5 · #213
68
NDSU -2.5 151.5 NDSU -2.4 STMN +0.1 154.2 Over 2.7 58% NDSU L L ›
Final
7-9 · #291
80
6-12 · #336
96
UND -1.5 160.5 UND -1.2 SDAK +0.3 166.5 Over 6.0 54% UND L W ›
Final
5-8 · #179
68
10-3 · #126
102
YALE -9.5 174.5 YALE -10.2 YALE +0.7 176.3 Over 1.8 81% YALE W L ›
Final
6-10 · #265
78
2-14 · #315
80
YSU -8.5 152.5 YSU -6.5 CLE +2.0 155.1 Over 2.6 72% YSU W W ›
Final
5-10 · #277
80
3-15 · #340
77
IUIN -1.5 169.5 DETM -1.3 DETM +2.8 172.5 Over 3.0 55% DETM W L ›
Final
6-9 · #187
89
11-4 · #118
104
AKR -21.5 163.5 AKR -17.0 WMU +4.5 168.1 Over 4.6 93% AKR W W ›
Final
10-7 · #239
67
10-5 · #236
82
MRST -8.5 141.5 MRST -10.1 MRST +1.6 138.8 Under 2.7 81% MRST W L ›
Final
11-7 · #260
74
7-11 · #330
59
SIE -6.5 144.5 SIE -6.8 SIE +0.3 150.1 Over 5.6 72% SIE W L ›
Final
5-11 · #135
80
7-8 · #136
87
HARV -4.5 133.5 HARV -6.7 HARV +2.2 134.4 Over 0.9 72% HARV W W ›
Final
3-12 · #349
62
5-10 · #331
57
MERC -4.5 128.5 MERC -6.3 MERC +1.8 130.3 Over 1.8 71% MERC L L ›
Final
7-6 · #337
98
CCSU -6.5 144.5 CCSU -7.9 CCSU +1.4 143.8 Under 0.8 75% CCSU W L ›
Final
6-10 · #332
72
1-15 · #362
57
LEM -6.5 146.5 LEM -2.5 CHST +4.0 151.2 Over 4.7 59% LEM L L ›
Final
10-6 · #173
76
7-9 · #184
75
ETSU -3.5 148.5 ETSU -3.6 ETSU +0.1 149.3 Over 0.8 63% ETSU L W ›
Final
7-8 · #298
72
5-11 · #266
90
FGCU -9.5 152.5 FGCU -8.9 WGA +0.6 159.0 Over 6.5 78% FGCU L W ›
Final
5-11 · #303
81
QUC -10.5 162.5 QUC -8.4 STET +2.1 162.4 Under 0.1 77% QUC W L ›
Final
1-15 · #333
69
6-10 · #240
98
CARK -12.5 164.5 CARK -9.7 UNF +2.8 164.8 Over 0.3 80% CARK L W ›
Final
7-7 · #189
76
6-8 · #178
63
FIU -2.5 168.5 FIU -1.0 SHSU +1.5 165.0 Under 3.5 53% FIU W W ›
Final
6-7 · #133
97
5-11 · #206
68
NMSU -4.5 134.5 NMSU -6.4 NMSU +1.9 138.0 Over 3.5 71% NMSU W W ›
Final
15-2 · #25
59
15-3 · #35
69
CLEM -4.5 143.5 CLEM -3.0 MIA +1.5 149.2 Over 5.7 60% CLEM L L ›
Final
14-1 · #58
74
10-6 · #80
84
USU -5.5 150.5 USU -6.3 USU +0.8 148.7 Under 1.8 71% USU L L ›
Final
10-6 · #142
74
4-13 · #124
78
SBU -5.5 141.5 SBU -1.6 LAS +3.9 143.3 Over 1.8 55% SBU W W ›
Final
7-9 · #218
83
7-9 · #246
85
RAD -4.5 157.5 RAD -3.6 LONG +0.9 160.0 Over 2.5 63% RAD W W ›
Final
11-6 · #131
44
7-10 · #176
54
UNI -1.5 130.5 UNI -3.0 UNI +1.5 129.7 Under 0.8 60% UNI L W ›
Final
7-9 · #144
67
6-10 · #110
74
UIC -5.5 139.5 UIC -2.4 DRKE +3.1 143.4 Over 3.9 58% UIC L W ›
Final
11-6 · #241
71
10-8 · #225
83
QUIN -1.5 141.5 QUIN -1.8 QUIN +0.3 141.2 Under 0.3 56% QUIN L L ›
Final
10-7 · #209
68
3-11 · #334
70
MASS -8.5 157.5 MASS -8.0 NIU +0.5 155.4 Under 2.1 76% MASS W W ›
Final
7-7 · #137
84
6-7 · #251
74
DART -2.5 163.5 DART -2.4 PENN +0.1 157.4 Under 6.1 58% DART W W ›
Final
9-9 · #283
79
11-6 · #296
75
GASO -6.5 157.5 GASO -4.9 CCU +1.6 158.3 Over 0.8 66% GASO W L ›
Final
4-12 · #223
90
4-10 · #292
68
UNA -1.5 133.5 UNA -3.0 UNA +1.5 138.3 Over 4.8 60% UNA L W ›
Final
8-6 · #148
81
9-6 · #129
65
WKU -7.5 165.5 WKU -3.2 KENN +4.3 167.1 Over 1.6 61% WKU W L ›
Final
3-11 · #190
69
11-3 · #160
80
LIB -13.5 137.5 LIB -11.9 UTEP +1.6 138.9 Over 1.4 85% LIB W W ›
Final
4-12 · #208
77
1-15 · #358
57
GAST -6.5 155.5 GAST -4.4 ULM +2.1 155.2 Under 0.3 65% GAST L W ›
Final
13-4 · #54
70
12-5 · #51
78
LSU -1.5 148.5 LSU -4.4 LSU +2.9 156.7 Over 8.2 65% LSU W L ›
Final
17-0 · #5
84
14-2 · #39
77
ARIZ -9.5 165.5 ARIZ -10.6 ARIZ +1.1 164.6 Under 0.9 82% ARIZ L W ›
Final
15-1 · #8
81
8-9 · #57
71
MICH -18.5 157.5 MICH -17.9 ORE +0.6 159.2 Over 1.7 94% MICH W L ›
Final
17-0 · #27
77
8-9 · #59
58
NEB -4.5 149.5 NEB -4.0 NU +0.5 148.2 Under 1.3 64% NEB L W ›
Final
14-3 · #44
78
12-5 · #92
84
UNC -7.5 151.5 UNC -5.5 CAL +2.0 149.6 Under 1.9 68% UNC W L ›
Final
13-4 · #18
76
14-3 · #34
90
UGA -2.5 181.5 UGA -3.0 UGA +0.5 180.6 Under 0.9 60% UGA W W ›
Final
7-9 · #207
81
15-3 · #132
85
MUR -11.5 167.5 MUR -10.2 INST +1.3 166.6 Under 0.9 81% MUR W W ›
Final
1-12 · #322
72
2-13 · #360
71
TXSO -1.5 146.5 TXSO -0.6 ALCN +0.9 152.7 Over 6.2 52% TXSO W L ›
Final
12-5 · #104
63
15-1 · #69
88
SLU -14.5 162.5 SLU -12.8 RICH +1.7 159.6 Under 2.9 87% SLU L W ›
Final
4-9 · #343
78
3-13 · #280
82
JKST -1.5 160.5 JKST -1.1 PV +0.4 160.0 Under 0.5 54% JKST L W ›
Final
12-5 · #96
81
3-14 · #220
66
NEV -14.5 134.5 NEV -15.9 NEV +1.4 135.3 Over 0.8 92% NEV W W ›
Final
10-7 · #117
106
8-9 · #191
112
COFC -4.5 142.5 COFC -3.8 STBK +0.7 142.7 Over 0.2 63% COFC W W ›
Final
8-7 · #242
102
5-11 · #284
92
MER -5.5 155.5 MER -5.6 MER +0.1 156.5 Over 1.0 69% MER W W ›
Final
11-5 · #123
83
6-11 · #329
62
UCSD -8.5 147.5 UCSD -9.4 UCSD +0.9 150.2 Over 2.7 79% UCSD W L ›
Final
7-8 · #293
90
7-9 · #285
80
NICH -3.5 139.5 NICH -2.2 LAM +1.3 140.0 Over 0.5 58% NICH W W ›
Final
4-15 · #221
59
11-5 · #228
56
USA -9.5 129.5 USA -10.7 USA +1.2 130.4 Over 0.9 82% USA L L ›
Final
8-9 · #158
72
10-7 · #231
77
MRSH -6.5 149.5 MRSH -4.4 JMU +2.1 152.9 Over 3.4 65% MRSH W L ›
Final
5-10 · #350
76
4-11 · #282
70
TNTC -1.5 141.5 TNTC -1.8 TNTC +0.3 147.0 Over 5.5 56% TNTC L W ›
Final
1-14 · #365
79
6-10 · #222
86
LR -10.5 135.5 LR -9.1 WIU +1.4 136.1 Over 0.6 79% LR W W ›
Final
10-5 · #257
74
11-4 · #150
86
UVU -11.5 143.5 UVU -8.3 UTA +3.3 140.3 Under 3.2 76% UVU L L ›
Final
7-8 · #197
83
3-11 · #357
69
HOW -2.5 141.5 HOW -1.0 NCCU +1.5 144.4 Over 2.9 53% HOW L W ›
Final
4-12 · #319
89
2-15 · #353
82
NORF -5.5 139.5 NORF -5.7 NORF +0.2 143.6 Over 4.1 69% NORF W W ›
Final
2-13 · #345
80
2-12 · #351
79
DSU -3.5 136.5 DSU -5.1 DSU +1.6 142.8 Over 6.3 67% DSU L W ›
Final
2-17 · #352
67
5-13 · #364
70
UMES -10.5 133.5 UMES -12.9 UMES +2.4 137.0 Over 3.5 87% UMES L W ›
Final
4-12 · #252
56
5-8 · #238
68
AMCC -5.5 130.5 AMCC -5.2 SELA +0.3 133.1 Over 2.6 67% AMCC L L ›
Final
5-11 · #342
70
3-12 · #300
81
HCU -2.5 139.5 HCU -4.1 HCU +1.6 140.9 Over 1.4 64% HCU W W ›
Final
10-6 · #171
74
10-6 · #147
99
TROY -3.5 165.5 TROY -2.9 ARST +0.6 168.5 Over 3.0 60% TROY L W ›
Final
9-8 · #224
67
8-9 · #103
74
TXST -2.5 140.5 TXST -0.8 USM +1.6 144.6 Over 4.1 53% TXST L W ›
Final
8-6 · #245
73
TNST -8.5 150.5 TNST -8.9 TNST +0.4 152.0 Over 1.5 78% TNST L L ›
Final
8-7 · #258
55
11-4 · #341
69
UTM -2.5 147.5 UTM -3.5 UTM +1.0 146.5 Under 1.0 62% UTM W W ›
Final
7-8 · #256
68
6-9 · #306
55
SEMO -9.5 139.5 SEMO -6.5 SIUE +3.0 143.5 Over 4.0 71% SEMO W L ›
Final
7-8 · #98
76
5-11 · #143
62
UNLV -7.5 146.5 UNLV -2.2 SJSU +5.3 154.0 Over 7.5 58% UNLV L L ›
Final
3-11 · #309
71
6-9 · #338
53
GRAM -1.5 153.5 GRAM -2.1 GRAM +0.6 150.7 Under 2.8 57% GRAM L W ›
Final
9-7 · #248
74
10-5 · #152
70
FUR -4.5 149.5 FUR -6.3 FUR +1.8 149.6 Over 0.1 71% FUR L L ›
Final
10-6 · #149
72
8-7 · #182
75
UCI -3.5 148.5 UCI -1.2 UCD +2.3 143.7 Under 4.8 54% UCI W W ›
Final
4-11 · #318
74
5-9 · #289
76
UIW -8.5 141.5 UIW -7.9 NWST +0.6 144.2 Over 2.7 76% UIW W W ›
Final
3-12 · #321
52
7-5 · #274
63
PRST -11.5 140.5 PRST -10.8 NAU +0.8 143.8 Over 3.3 83% PRST W L ›
Final
7-7 · #244
60
5-9 · #198
64
JXST -4.5 127.5 JXST -2.7 LT +1.8 126.4 Under 1.1 59% JXST W W ›
Final
1-15 · #335
62
6-10 · #201
90
SDST -13.5 151.5 SDST -12.7 KC +0.8 150.4 Under 1.1 87% SDST L L ›
Final
12-3 · #127
76
4-11 · #287
79
MCN -9.5 146.5 MCN -10.0 MCN +0.5 146.6 Over 0.1 81% MCN L W ›
Final
16-1 · #23
69
13-3 · #36
64
PUR -9.5 155.5 PUR -10.9 PUR +1.4 160.8 Over 5.3 83% PUR L L ›
Final
16-1 · #3
80
14-4 · #85
50
DUKE -11.5 148.5 DUKE -13.5 DUKE +2.0 148.2 Under 0.3 88% DUKE W W ›
Final
15-2 · #10
80
10-7 · #56
63
MSU -3.5 145.5 MSU -3.6 MSU +0.1 145.0 Under 0.5 62% MSU W W ›
Final
10-8 · #163
81
10-10 · #99
64
ORST -1.5 139.5 ORST -0.0 PAC +1.5 143.0 Over 3.5 50% ORST W W ›
Final
12-5 · #65
61
11-6 · #47
72
WVU -6.5 141.5 WVU -4.5 COLO +2.0 147.3 Over 5.8 65% WVU L L ›
Final
10-7 · #89
69
7-10 · #81
68
WAKE -1.5 168.5 WAKE -1.6 WAKE +0.1 164.7 Under 3.8 55% WAKE L W ›
Final
12-3 · #193
84
6-11 · #276
79
SFA -6.5 147.5 SFA -5.3 NOLA +1.2 149.5 Over 2.0 68% SFA W W ›
Final
2-14 · #254
84
7-8 · #344
66
IDST -6.5 152.5 IDST -5.7 EWU +0.8 156.3 Over 3.8 69% IDST W L ›
Final
13-4 · #28
74
10-6 · #11
70
TEX -4.5 166.5 TEX -2.7 TA&M +1.8 170.6 Over 4.1 59% TEX W L ›
Final
10-7 · #79
67
10-7 · #21
71
AUB -13.5 152.5 AUB -12.8 SC +0.7 158.6 Over 6.1 87% AUB W L ›
Final
7-7 · #250
87
7-7 · #154
90
MTSU -5.5 137.5 MTSU -8.1 MTSU +2.6 139.1 Over 1.6 76% MTSU L W ›
Final
3-9 · #327
71
4-11 · #363
67
UAPB -2.5 149.5 UAPB -1.7 FAMU +0.8 156.9 Over 7.4 56% UAPB W L ›
Final
4-11 · #202
79
0-17 · #366
63
BCU -16.5 144.5 BCU -14.2 MVSU +2.3 148.0 Over 3.5 89% BCU W L ›
Final
15-3 · #138
73
7-10 · #195
68
BEL -3.5 151.5 BEL -1.6 SIU +1.9 156.0 Over 4.5 55% BEL L L ›
Final
16-2 · #97
54
14-5 · #106
62
SCU -1.5 152.5 SCU -1.8 SCU +0.3 152.2 Under 0.3 56% SCU W W ›
Final
10-6 · #122
60
7-9 · #174
63
WYO -3.5 145.5 WYO -3.5 — 147.0 Over 1.5 62% WYO L ›
Final
6-10 · #325
69
13-4 · #90
89
HPU -16.5 152.5 HPU -16.2 UPST +0.3 159.6 Over 7.1 92% HPU L W ›
Final
9-8 · #168
92
11-6 · #230
89
NKU -7.5 153.5 NKU -6.2 RMU +1.3 153.8 Over 0.3 71% NKU W W ›
Final
10-7 · #324
66
2-12 · #356
59
LIU -7.5 143.5 LIU -5.4 FDU +2.1 147.0 Over 3.5 68% LIU W L ›
Final
7-9 · #243
75
14-2 · #120
78
UNCW -6.5 149.5 UNCW -6.2 CAM +0.3 149.8 Over 0.3 70% UNCW W W ›
Final
1-14 · #339
82
3-12 · #320
68
VMI -6.5 143.5 VMI -5.2 CIT +1.3 145.8 Over 2.3 67% VMI W W ›
Final
4-11 · #295
69
4-12 · #294
89
EKU -5.5 156.5 EKU -3.2 BELL +2.3 158.8 Over 2.3 61% EKU L W ›
Final
9-5 · #210
78
9-7 · #214
82
LIP -2.5 155.5 LIP -3.3 LIP +0.8 149.5 Under 6.0 61% LIP W L ›
Final
16-1 · #24
71
13-4 · #12
84
TTU -2.5 165.5 BYU -0.3 BYU +2.8 158.5 Under 7.0 51% BYU L W ›
Final
12-5 · #14
100
8-9 · #74
59
LOU -7.5 152.5 LOU -8.3 LOU +0.8 152.0 Under 0.5 76% LOU W L ›
Final
13-3 · #82
79
11-4 · #75
83
SDSU -5.5 148.5 SDSU -1.4 UNM +4.1 150.3 Over 1.8 55% SDSU W W ›
Final
5-11 · #297
87
9-8 · #194
80
CSUN -7.5 158.5 CSUN -6.2 LBSU +1.3 159.8 Over 1.3 71% CSUN W W ›
Final
6-11 · #312
72
4-12 · #281
81
CSUF -3.5 157.5 UCR -0.2 UCR +3.7 158.8 Over 1.3 51% UCR W L ›
Final
12-5 · #9
86
14-3 · #32
79
SJU -2.5 147.5 SJU -3.8 SJU +1.3 149.2 Over 1.7 63% SJU W W ›
Final
4-11 · #279
73
2-14 · #305
62
ORU -1.5 149.5 ORU -0.1 OMA +1.4 153.0 Over 3.5 50% ORU W L ›
Final
10-7 · #46
68
10-7 · #53
67
MSST -3.5 147.5 MSST -2.3 MISS +1.2 152.5 Over 5.0 58% MSST W L ›
Final
7-8 · #253
52
2-13 · #267
74
ACU -3.5 149.5 ACU -3.0 SUU +0.5 146.4 Under 3.1 60% ACU W W ›
Final
7-11 · #169
71
10-9 · #121
58
LMU -8.5 148.5 LMU -7.4 PORT +1.1 148.5 — 74% LMU W ›
Final
11-3 · #140
62
8-7 · #134
77
HAW -2.5 143.5 HAW -5.6 HAW +3.1 144.8 Over 1.3 69% HAW L L ›
Final
6-7 · #273
67
6-8 · #162
76
MTST -5.5 150.5 MTST -5.0 MONT +0.5 150.6 Over 0.1 67% MTST L L ›
Final
7-7 · #247
75
8-8 · #313
67
IDHO -1.5 158.5 WEB -2.0 WEB +3.5 156.4 Under 2.1 57% WEB L W ›
Final
7-7 · #185
71
6-10 · #268
75
UTU -3.5 150.5 TAR -0.9 TAR +4.4 155.7 Over 5.2 53% TAR L L ›
Final
18-1 · #17
71
11-6 · #119
50
GONZ -9.5 150.5 GONZ -17.8 GONZ +8.3 150.2 Under 0.3 94% GONZ W W ›
Final
9-8 · #83
83
13-4 · #45
84
OKST -2.5 175.5 OKST -4.1 OKST +1.6 173.1 Under 2.4 64% OKST L W ›
Final
8-7 · #219
89
2-11 · #196
93
UNCO -6.5 163.5 UNCO -3.6 SAC +2.9 163.5 — 62% UNCO W ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record