Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games3535 final · 0 to play
Lines moved251+ pt since the open · 35 with a line
Totals moved311+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS21-1460% covered
Upsets5outright
Over / Under26-974% over
Model Favorite30-586% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
ISU @ KUISU -3.5 → ISU -3.5no move143.5 → 152.5▲ 9
FSU @ SYRSYR -8.5 → SYR -4.54 → FSU158.5 → 160.5▲ 2
AF @ SJSUSJSU -9.5 → SJSU -5.54 → AF133.5 → 128.5▼ 5
BC @ CLEMCLEM -17.5 → CLEM -15.52 → BC130.5 → 136.5▲ 6
MIA @ NDMIA -2.5 → MIA -5.53 → MIA144.5 → 143.5▼ 1
MASS @ WMUMASS -2.5 → MASS -5.53 → MASS161.5 → 157.5▼ 4
ALA @ MSSTALA -7.5 → ALA -4.53 → MSST173.5 → 171.5▼ 2
FLA @ OUFLA -4.5 → FLA -7.53 → FLA153.5 → 157.5▲ 4
GCU @ UNMUNM -8.5 → UNM -6.52 → GCU140.5 → 146.5▲ 6
IU @ MSUMSU -6.5 → MSU -6.5no move139.5 → 145.5▲ 6
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalConference
13-3 · #32
88
8-8 · #52
82
Spread
VILL -2.5
✓ VILL W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼2
▲ Over 170
Projected
81–80
✓ VILL won
Model: PROV by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 4.4 ✓
FinalConference
6-11 · #42
68
11-5 · #9
92
Spread
SJU -15.5
✓ SJU W ATS
Total
155.5
▲ Over 160
Projected
70–86
✓ SJU won
Model: SJU by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 0.8 ✓
FinalConference
3-10 · #334
59
7-9 · #188
77
Spread
EMU -7.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲3
▼ Under 136
Projected
66–76
✓ EMU won
Model: EMU by 3.3 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗
FinalConference
10-4 · #151
87
11-3 · #237
81
Spread
KENT -2.5
✓ KENT W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲1
▲ Over 168
Projected
83–82
✓ KENT won
Model: BUF by 1.4 ✗ Model: Under 1.1 ✗
FinalConference
12-4 · #38
60
14-2 · #10 AP #12
81
Spread
MSU -6.5
✓ MSU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲6
▼ Under 141
Projected
70–75
✓ MSU won
Model: IU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓
FinalConference
14-2 · #20 AP #16
79
12-4 · #14 AP #20
70
Spread
LOU -4.5
✓ UVA W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲2
▼ Under 149
Projected
75–82
✗ LOU lost
Model: LOU by 2.7 ✗ Model: Over 3.2 ✗
FinalConference
7-9 · #95
50
14-3 · #35 AP #22
74
Spread
CLEM -15.5
✓ CLEM W ATS
Total
136.5 ▲6
▼ Under 124
Projected
61–77
✓ CLEM won
Model: CLEM by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 1.6 ✗
FinalConference
13-3 · #28
82
11-5 · #7 AP #24
87
Spread
TENN -11.5
✓ TA&M W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲1
▲ Over 169
Projected
77–83
✓ TENN won
Model: TA&M by 5.7 ✓ Model: Over 0.7 ✓
FinalConference
UIC
5-10 · #110
69
11-5 · #131
61
Spread
UNI -6.5
✓ UIC W ATS
Total
128.5 ▲4
▲ Over 130
Projected
62–69
✗ UNI lost
Model: UNI by 1.3 ✗ Model: Over 2.3 ✓
FinalConference
15-1 · #93
82
5-12 · #113
74
Spread
GMU -11.5
✓ LUC W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼2
▲ Over 156
Projected
77–67
✓ GMU won
Model: LUC by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 2.7 ✓
FinalConference
12-4 · #91
71
7-7 · #107
65
Spread
DAY -2.5
✓ DAY W ATS
Total
152.5
▼ Under 136
Projected
81–77
✓ DAY won
Model: DAY by 1.7 ✓ Model: Over 5.4 ✗
FinalConference
11-5 · #41
78
10-6 · #70
75
Spread
WIS -1.5
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲3
▲ Over 153
Projected
75–72
✓ WIS won
Model: WIS by 2.1 ✓ Model: Over 0.4 ✓
FinalConference
14-2 · #25
81
10-6 · #71
69
Spread
MIA -5.5
✓ MIA W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼1
▲ Over 150
Projected
76–73
✓ MIA won
Model: ND by 2.0 ✗ Model: Over 5.4 ✓
FinalConference
9-7 · #209
85
6-8 · #187
82
Spread
MASS -5.5
✓ WMU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▼4
▲ Over 167
Projected
81–78
✓ MASS won
Model: WMU by 2.8 ✓ Model: Over 2.1 ✓
FinalConference
Ohio
8-7 · #128
85
7-7 · #157
101
Spread
TOL -2.5
✓ TOL W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲4
▲ Over 186
Projected
80–81
✓ TOL won
Model: OHIO by 1.4 ✗ Model: Under 0.3 ✗
FinalConference
3-12 · #270
61
14-0 · #125
100
Spread
M-OH -15.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲3
▲ Over 161
Projected
71–85
✓ M-OH won
Model: CMU by 1.9 ✗ Model: Under 2.4 ✗
FinalConference
2-12 · #181
77
10-4 · #118
87
Spread
AKR -20.5
✓ BALL W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼2
▲ Over 164
Projected
68–88
✓ AKR won
Model: BALL by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 3.6 ✓
FinalConference
7-9 · #176
74
14-3 · #138
78
Spread
BEL -11.5
✓ VAL W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼1
▲ Over 152
Projected
70–81
✓ BEL won
Model: VAL by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓
FinalConference
16-1 · #6 AP #3
69
14-2 · #67 AP #25
64
Spread
CONN -6.5
✓ HALL W ATS
Total
132.5 ▲3
▲ Over 133
Projected
70–63
✓ CONN won
Model: CONN by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 0.4 ✓
FinalConference
11-6 · #167
94
3-13 · #255
90
Spread
BRAD -7.5
✓ EVAN W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲1
▲ Over 184
Projected
75–68
✓ BRAD won
Model: EVAN by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 0.2 ✓
FinalConference
11-5 · #47
48
15-1 · #2 AP #7
77
Spread
HOU -13.5
✓ HOU W ATS
Total
127.5 ▼2
▼ Under 125
Projected
57–71
✓ HOU won
Model: HOU by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 0.6 ✗
FinalConference
1-13 · #365
55
4-10 · #361
57
Spread
EIU -6.5
✓ WIU W ATS
Total
132.5 ▲4
▼ Under 112
Projected
63–71
✓ EIU won
Model: EIU by 1.7 ✗ Model: Over 1.3 ✗
FinalConference
16-0 · #13 AP #2
63
11-5 · #16
84
Spread
ISU -3.5
✓ KU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲9
▼ Under 147
Projected
78–73
✗ ISU lost
Model: ISU by 1.3 ✗ Model: Under 1.8 ✓
FinalConference
8-8 · #57
55
16-0 · #27 AP #8
90
Spread
NEB -10.5
✓ NEB W ATS
Total
146.5
▼ Under 145
Projected
69–78
✓ NEB won
Model: ORE by 1.3 ✗ Model: Over 1.1 ✗
FinalConference
11-5 · #15 AP #18
97
10-6 · #53
82
Spread
ALA -4.5
✓ ALA W ATS
Total
171.5 ▼2
▲ Over 179
Projected
92–84
✓ ALA won
Model: ALA by 3.7 ✓ Model: Over 4.4 ✓
FinalConference
11-5 · #1 AP #19
96
11-5 · #31
79
Spread
FLA -7.5
✓ FLA W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲4
▲ Over 175
Projected
85–75
✓ FLA won
Model: FLA by 3.0 ✓ Model: Over 1.9 ✓
FinalConference
10-5 · #87
69
6-9 · #174
79
Spread
CSU -3.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
139.5 ▲3
▲ Over 148
Projected
73–68
✗ CSU lost
Model: CSU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 2.2 ✓
FinalConference
9-5 · #29
94
13-3 · #45
79
Spread
BAY -1.5
✓ BAY W ATS
Total
165.5 ▼3
▲ Over 173
Projected
86–86
✓ BAY won
Model: OKST by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 6.4 ✓
FinalConference
10-5 · #80
64
12-3 · #82
87
Spread
UNM -6.5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲6
▲ Over 151
Projected
70–76
✓ UNM won
Model: GCU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.1 ✗
FinalConference
9-7 · #64
83
10-7 · #37
86
Spread
CREI -8.5
✓ GTWN W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼1
▲ Over 169
Projected
70–80
✓ CREI won
Model: CREI by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 2.6 ✓
FinalConference
7-9 · #81
86
11-5 · #63
94
Spread
SYR -4.5
✓ SYR W ATS
Total
160.5 ▲2
▲ Over 180
Projected
76–82
✓ SYR won
Model: SYR by 1.6 ✓ Model: Under 2.2 ✗
FinalConference
3-13 · #220
62
4-11 · #143
70
Spread
SJSU -5.5
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
128.5 ▼5
▲ Over 132
Projected
62–74
✓ SJSU won
Model: SJSU by 5.9 ✓ Model: Over 7.6 ✓
FinalConference
7-9 · #50
71
USC
12-3 · #36
88
Spread
USC -9.5
✓ USC W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲2
▲ Over 159
Projected
75–83
✓ USC won
Model: MD by 1.9 ✗ Model: Over 6.9 ✓
FinalConference
15-2 · #97
82
11-7 · #161
68
Spread
SMC -5.5
✓ SMC W ATS
Total
141.5
▲ Over 150
Projected
73–69
✓ SMC won
Model: SF by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 0.2 ✓
FinalConference
8-6 · #86
85
UNLV
6-8 · #98
89
Spread
BOIS -1.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲4
▲ Over 174
Projected
78–74
✗ BOIS lost
Model: BOIS by 2.7 ✗ Model: Over 1.6 ✓
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
13-3 · #32
88
8-8 · #52
82
VILL -2.5 156.5 VILL -1.5 PROV +1.0 160.9 Over 4.4 55% VILL L W ›
Final
6-11 · #42
68
11-5 · #9
92
SJU -15.5 155.5 SJU -16.4 SJU +0.9 156.3 Over 0.8 92% SJU W W ›
Final
3-10 · #334
59
7-9 · #188
77
EMU -7.5 141.5 EMU -10.8 EMU +3.3 142.0 Over 0.5 83% EMU W L ›
Final
10-4 · #151
87
11-3 · #237
81
KENT -2.5 165.5 KENT -1.1 BUF +1.4 164.4 Under 1.1 54% KENT L L ›
Final
12-4 · #38
60
14-2 · #10
81
MSU -6.5 145.5 MSU -5.0 IU +1.5 145.0 Under 0.5 67% MSU L W ›
Final
14-2 · #20
79
12-4 · #14
70
LOU -4.5 154.5 LOU -7.2 LOU +2.7 157.7 Over 3.2 73% LOU L L ›
Final
7-9 · #95
50
14-3 · #35
74
CLEM -15.5 136.5 CLEM -15.8 CLEM +0.3 138.1 Over 1.6 92% CLEM W L ›
Final
13-3 · #28
82
11-5 · #7
87
TENN -11.5 159.5 TENN -5.8 TA&M +5.7 160.2 Over 0.7 69% TENN W W ›
Final
5-10 · #110
69
11-5 · #131
61
UNI -6.5 128.5 UNI -7.8 UNI +1.3 130.8 Over 2.3 75% UNI L W ›
Final
15-1 · #93
82
5-12 · #113
74
GMU -11.5 140.5 GMU -9.9 LUC +1.6 143.2 Over 2.7 81% GMU W W ›
Final
12-4 · #91
71
7-7 · #107
65
DAY -2.5 152.5 DAY -4.2 DAY +1.7 157.9 Over 5.4 64% DAY W L ›
Final
11-5 · #41
78
10-6 · #70
75
WIS -1.5 146.5 WIS -3.6 WIS +2.1 146.9 Over 0.4 62% WIS W W ›
Final
14-2 · #25
81
10-6 · #71
69
MIA -5.5 143.5 MIA -3.5 ND +2.0 148.9 Over 5.4 62% MIA L W ›
Final
9-7 · #209
85
6-8 · #187
82
MASS -5.5 157.5 MASS -2.7 WMU +2.8 159.6 Over 2.1 59% MASS W W ›
Final
8-7 · #128
85
7-7 · #157
101
TOL -2.5 161.5 TOL -1.1 OHIO +1.4 161.2 Under 0.3 54% TOL L L ›
Final
3-12 · #270
61
14-0 · #125
100
M-OH -15.5 158.5 M-OH -13.6 CMU +1.9 156.1 Under 2.4 88% M-OH L L ›
Final
2-12 · #181
77
10-4 · #118
87
AKR -20.5 152.5 AKR -19.9 BALL +0.6 156.1 Over 3.6 96% AKR W W ›
Final
7-9 · #176
74
14-3 · #138
78
BEL -11.5 146.5 BEL -10.9 VAL +0.6 150.0 Over 3.5 83% BEL W W ›
Final
16-1 · #6
69
14-2 · #67
64
CONN -6.5 132.5 CONN -7.6 CONN +1.1 132.9 Over 0.4 75% CONN L W ›
Final
11-6 · #167
94
3-13 · #255
90
BRAD -7.5 142.5 BRAD -6.7 EVAN +0.8 142.7 Over 0.2 72% BRAD W W ›
Final
11-5 · #47
48
15-1 · #2
77
HOU -13.5 127.5 HOU -13.8 HOU +0.3 128.1 Over 0.6 89% HOU W L ›
Final
1-13 · #365
55
4-10 · #361
57
EIU -6.5 132.5 EIU -8.2 EIU +1.7 133.8 Over 1.3 76% EIU L L ›
Final
16-0 · #13
63
11-5 · #16
84
ISU -3.5 152.5 ISU -4.8 ISU +1.3 150.7 Under 1.8 66% ISU L W ›
Final
8-8 · #57
55
16-0 · #27
90
NEB -10.5 146.5 NEB -9.2 ORE +1.3 147.6 Over 1.1 79% NEB L L ›
Final
11-5 · #15
97
10-6 · #53
82
ALA -4.5 171.5 ALA -8.2 ALA +3.7 175.9 Over 4.4 76% ALA W W ›
Final
11-5 · #1
96
11-5 · #31
79
FLA -7.5 157.5 FLA -10.5 FLA +3.0 159.4 Over 1.9 82% FLA W W ›
Final
10-5 · #87
69
6-9 · #174
79
CSU -3.5 139.5 CSU -5.0 CSU +1.5 141.7 Over 2.2 67% CSU L W ›
Final
9-5 · #29
94
13-3 · #45
79
BAY -1.5 165.5 BAY -0.5 OKST +1.0 171.9 Over 6.4 52% BAY L W ›
Final
10-5 · #80
64
12-3 · #82
87
UNM -6.5 146.5 UNM -6.0 GCU +0.5 145.4 Under 1.1 70% UNM L L ›
Final
9-7 · #64
83
10-7 · #37
86
CREI -8.5 147.5 CREI -10.3 CREI +1.8 150.1 Over 2.6 82% CREI L W ›
Final
7-9 · #81
86
11-5 · #63
94
SYR -4.5 160.5 SYR -6.1 SYR +1.6 158.3 Under 2.2 70% SYR W L ›
Final
3-13 · #220
62
4-11 · #143
70
SJSU -5.5 128.5 SJSU -11.4 SJSU +5.9 136.1 Over 7.6 84% SJSU W W ›
Final
7-9 · #50
71
12-3 · #36
88
USC -9.5 150.5 USC -7.6 MD +1.9 157.4 Over 6.9 75% USC L W ›
Final
15-2 · #97
82
11-7 · #161
68
SMC -5.5 141.5 SMC -4.6 SF +0.9 141.7 Over 0.2 66% SMC L W ›
Final
8-6 · #86
85
6-8 · #98
89
BOIS -1.5 150.5 BOIS -4.2 BOIS +2.7 152.1 Over 1.6 64% BOIS L W ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record