Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games3434 final · 0 to play
Lines moved221+ pt since the open · 34 with a line
Totals moved281+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS16-1847% covered
Upsets8outright
Over / Under13-2138% over
Model Favorite28-682% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
BGSU @ WMUBGSU -7.5 → BGSU -6.51 → WMU158.5 → 152.5▼ 6
RUTG @ IOWAIOWA -20.5 → IOWA -17.53 → RUTG139.5 → 140.5▲ 1
SMU @ WAKESMU -1.5 → WAKE -1.53 → WAKE158.5 → 157.5▼ 1
NIU @ OHIOOHIO -12.5 → OHIO -11.51 → NIU149.5 → 154.5▲ 5
TTU @ BAYTTU -1.5 → TTU -1.5no move159.5 → 154.5▼ 5
SJSU @ NEVNEV -16.5 → NEV -16.5no move142.5 → 137.5▼ 5
LSU @ FLAFLA -13.5 → FLA -15.52 → FLA158.5 → 158.5no move
LUC @ SBUSBU -12.5 → SBU -10.52 → LUC147.5 → 147.5no move
HALL @ SJUSJU -9.5 → SJU -11.52 → SJU143.5 → 145.5▲ 2
EVAN @ UICUIC -9.5 → UIC -8.51 → EVAN135.5 → 139.5▲ 4
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalConference
8-8 · #157
82
10-8 · #209
84
Spread
MASS -2.5
✓ TOL W ATS
Total
164.5 ▲1
▲ Over 166
Projected
81–82
✓ MASS won
Model: TOL by 1.1 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗
FinalConference
10-8 · #70
74
12-5 · #33
82
Spread
OSU -7.5
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
143.5
▲ Over 156
Projected
70–79
✓ OSU won
Model: OSU by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 4.9 ✓
FinalConference
12-4 · #118
82
11-5 · #237
63
Spread
AKR -8.5
✓ AKR W ATS
Total
166.5 ▼3
▼ Under 145
Projected
90–81
✓ AKR won
Model: Over 4.1 ✗
FinalConference
12-6 · #38
72
16-1 · #8 AP #3
86
Spread
MICH -15.5
✓ IU W ATS
Total
163.5 ▲2
▼ Under 158
Projected
72–89
✓ MICH won
Model: MICH by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.3 ✓
FinalConference
UCF
14-3 · #39
57
16-2 · #13 AP #9
87
Spread
ISU -14.5
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲1
▼ Under 144
Projected
73–85
✓ ISU won
Model: UCF by 2.2 ✗ Model: Over 1.3 ✗
FinalConference
LSU
13-5 · #51
61
13-5 · #1 AP #16
79
Spread
FLA -15.5
✓ FLA W ATS
Total
158.5
▼ Under 140
Projected
74–87
✓ FLA won
Model: LSU by 2.0 ✗ Model: Over 2.9 ✗
FinalConference
12-6 · #48
80
16-3 · #35 AP #18
76
Spread
CLEM -2.5
✓ NCSU W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼3
▲ Over 156
Projected
72–75
✗ CLEM lost
Model: CLEM by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 3.7 ✓
FinalConference
16-1 · #69 AP #24
81
8-8 · #107
77
Spread
SLU -8.5
✓ DUQ W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲1
▼ Under 158
Projected
88–79
✓ SLU won
Model: DUQ by 0.2 ✓ Model: Over 1.4 ✗
FinalConference
16-0 · #125 AP #25
107
12-4 · #151
101
Spread
KENT -1.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
167.5 ▼3
▲ Over 208
Projected
85–85
✓ M-OH won
Model: M-OH by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 2.9 ✓
FinalConference
5-14 · #113
70
10-7 · #142
84
Spread
SBU -10.5
✓ SBU W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 154
Projected
70–79
✓ SBU won
Model: LUC by 1.3 ✗ Model: Over 1.1 ✓
FinalConference
14-4 · #67
60
13-5 · #9
65
Spread
SJU -11.5
✓ HALL W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲2
▼ Under 125
Projected
66–79
✓ SJU won
Model: SJU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓
FinalConference
7-11 · #81
65
15-3 · #25
63
Spread
MIA -10.5
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
163.5 ▼3
▼ Under 128
Projected
77–88
✗ MIA lost
Model: MIA by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.1 ✗
FinalConference
4-11 · #334
77
Ohio
8-9 · #128
80
Spread
OHIO -11.5
✓ NIU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲5
▲ Over 157
Projected
71–83
✓ OHIO won
Model: OHIO by 1.1 ✗ Model: Under 0.6 ✗
FinalConference
9-6 · #200
72
6-10 · #187
54
Spread
BGSU -6.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼6
▼ Under 126
Projected
80–75
✓ BGSU won
Model: WMU by 1.6 ✗ Model: Over 2.3 ✗
FinalConference
3-13 · #181
68
3-13 · #270
67
Spread
BALL -1.5
✓ CMU W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲1
▼ Under 135
Projected
70–71
✗ CMU lost
Model: CMU by 2.4 ✓ Model: Under 2.4 ✓
FinalConference
11-7 · #31
76
10-8 · #79
85
Spread
OU -2.5
✓ SC W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲2
▲ Over 161
Projected
76–76
✗ OU lost
Model: SC by 2.4 ✓ Model: Over 1.9 ✓
FinalConference
11-7 · #66
80
11-7 · #72
87
Spread
BTLR -7.5
✓ DEP W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼1
▲ Over 167
Projected
72–80
✓ BTLR won
Model: BTLR by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 3.9 ✓
FinalConference
3-14 · #255
49
UIC
7-10 · #110
76
Spread
UIC -8.5
✓ UIC W ATS
Total
139.5 ▲4
▼ Under 125
Projected
67–75
✓ UIC won
Model: EVAN by 0.7 ✗ Model: Over 2.1 ✗
FinalConference
14-4 · #45
65
TCU
11-7 · #40
68
Spread
TCU -8.5
✓ OKST W ATS
Total
161.5 ▼1
▼ Under 133
Projected
78–83
✓ TCU won
Model: OKST by 3.7 ✓ Model: Under 0.7 ✓
FinalConference
9-9 · #62
62
Iowa
13-5 · #43
68
Spread
IOWA -17.5
✓ RUTG W ATS
Total
140.5 ▲1
▼ Under 130
Projected
63–80
✓ IOWA won
Model: RUTG by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 2.6 ✗
FinalConference
9-7 · #86
81
10-7 · #122
65
Spread
BOIS -1.5
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼2
▲ Over 146
Projected
74–74
✓ BOIS won
Model: WYO by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓
FinalConference
12-4 · #341
50
6-10 · #306
66
Spread
SEMO -2.5
✓ SEMO W ATS
Total
140.5 ▲1
▼ Under 116
Projected
71–73
✓ SEMO won
Model: UTM by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 3.3 ✗
FinalConference
16-2 · #10 AP #10
68
8-10 · #57
52
Spread
MSU -10.5
✓ MSU W ATS
Total
139.5 ▲2
▼ Under 120
Projected
75–67
✓ MSU won
Model: ORE by 2.6 ✗ Model: Over 2.4 ✗
FinalConference
14-4 · #12 AP #12
92
10-6 · #29
73
Spread
TTU -1.5
✓ TTU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼5
▲ Over 165
Projected
80–78
✓ TTU won
Model: TTU by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 4.1 ✓
FinalConference
15-3 · #34 AP #21
74
13-5 · #54
72
Spread
MIZ -1.5
✓ UGA W ATS
Total
163.5 ▼3
▼ Under 146
Projected
86–82
✓ UGA won
Model: UGA by 5.2 ✓ Model: Over 4.8 ✗
FinalConference
Utah
9-9 · #73
78
9-9 · #83
81
Spread
KSU -10.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
Total
168.5
▼ Under 159
Projected
81–87
✓ KSU won
Model: UTAH by 4.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✓
FinalConference
SMU
13-5 · #55
91
11-7 · #89
79
Spread
WAKE -1.5
✓ SMU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▼1
▲ Over 170
Projected
81–80
✓ SMU won
Model: SMU by 3.0 ✓ Model: Over 3.0 ✓
FinalConference
3-15 · #220
52
10-7 · #87
81
Spread
CSU -19.5
✓ CSU W ATS
Total
133.5 ▼1
▼ Under 133
Projected
58–77
✓ CSU won
Model: AF by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 0.9 ✗
FinalConference
11-7 · #21
78
11-7 · #46
66
Spread
AUB -3.5
✓ AUB W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲1
▼ Under 144
Projected
80–75
✓ AUB won
Model: AUB by 1.4 ✓ Model: Over 4.0 ✗
FinalConference
16-2 · #22 AP #15
68
13-5 · #18 AP #20
93
Spread
ARK -1.5
✓ ARK W ATS
Total
173.5
▼ Under 161
Projected
86–87
✓ ARK won
Model: VAN by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.5 ✓
FinalConference
17-1 · #23 AP #4
67
UCLA
12-6 · #26
69
Spread
PUR -5.5
✓ UCLA W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲1
▼ Under 136
Projected
77–70
✗ PUR lost
Model: PUR by 1.9 ✗ Model: Under 0.7 ✓
FinalConference
5-12 · #143
54
13-5 · #96
87
Spread
NEV -16.5
✓ NEV W ATS
Total
137.5 ▼5
▲ Over 141
Projected
66–79
✓ NEV won
Model: SJSU by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 6.5 ✓
FinalConference
UNLV
8-8 · #98
86
14-2 · #58
76
Spread
USU -15.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
156.5
▲ Over 162
Projected
72–87
✗ USU lost
Model: UNLV by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 2.9 ✓
FinalConference
13-5 · #16 AP #19
75
12-6 · #65
69
Spread
KU -4.5
✓ KU W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼1
▼ Under 144
Projected
81–75
✓ KU won
Model: KU by 2.2 ✓ Model: Over 0.6 ✗
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
8-8 · #157
82
10-8 · #209
84
MASS -2.5 164.5 MASS -1.4 TOL +1.1 163.0 Under 1.5 55% MASS W L ›
Final
10-8 · #70
74
12-5 · #33
82
OSU -7.5 143.5 OSU -8.6 OSU +1.1 148.4 Over 4.9 77% OSU W W ›
Final
12-4 · #118
82
11-5 · #237
63
AKR -8.5 166.5 AKR -8.5 — 170.6 Over 4.1 77% AKR L ›
Final
12-6 · #38
72
16-1 · #8
86
MICH -15.5 163.5 MICH -17.0 MICH +1.5 161.2 Under 2.3 93% MICH L W ›
Final
14-3 · #39
57
16-2 · #13
87
ISU -14.5 156.5 ISU -12.3 UCF +2.2 157.8 Over 1.3 86% ISU L L ›
Final
13-5 · #51
61
13-5 · #1
79
FLA -15.5 158.5 FLA -13.5 LSU +2.0 161.4 Over 2.9 88% FLA L L ›
Final
12-6 · #48
80
16-3 · #35
76
CLEM -2.5 142.5 CLEM -2.9 CLEM +0.4 146.2 Over 3.7 60% CLEM L W ›
Final
16-1 · #69
81
8-8 · #107
77
SLU -8.5 165.5 SLU -8.3 DUQ +0.2 166.9 Over 1.4 77% SLU W L ›
Final
16-0 · #125
107
12-4 · #151
101
KENT -1.5 167.5 M-OH -0.3 M-OH +1.8 170.4 Over 2.9 51% M-OH W W ›
Final
5-14 · #113
70
10-7 · #142
84
SBU -10.5 147.5 SBU -9.2 LUC +1.3 148.6 Over 1.1 79% SBU L W ›
Final
14-4 · #67
60
13-5 · #9
65
SJU -11.5 145.5 SJU -13.0 SJU +1.5 144.0 Under 1.5 87% SJU L W ›
Final
7-11 · #81
65
15-3 · #25
63
MIA -10.5 163.5 MIA -11.0 MIA +0.5 164.6 Over 1.1 83% MIA L L ›
Final
4-11 · #334
77
8-9 · #128
80
OHIO -11.5 154.5 OHIO -12.6 OHIO +1.1 153.9 Under 0.6 86% OHIO L L ›
Final
9-6 · #200
72
6-10 · #187
54
BGSU -6.5 152.5 BGSU -4.9 WMU +1.6 154.8 Over 2.3 66% BGSU L L ›
Final
3-13 · #181
68
3-13 · #270
67
BALL -1.5 142.5 CMU -0.9 CMU +2.4 140.1 Under 2.4 53% CMU W W ›
Final
11-7 · #31
76
10-8 · #79
85
OU -2.5 150.5 OU -0.1 SC +2.4 152.4 Over 1.9 50% SC W W ›
Final
11-7 · #66
80
11-7 · #72
87
BTLR -7.5 147.5 BTLR -7.6 BTLR +0.1 151.4 Over 3.9 75% BTLR L W ›
Final
3-14 · #255
49
7-10 · #110
76
UIC -8.5 139.5 UIC -7.8 EVAN +0.7 141.6 Over 2.1 75% UIC L L ›
Final
14-4 · #45
65
11-7 · #40
68
TCU -8.5 161.5 TCU -4.8 OKST +3.7 160.8 Under 0.7 66% TCU W W ›
Final
9-9 · #62
62
13-5 · #43
68
IOWA -17.5 140.5 IOWA -16.7 RUTG +0.8 143.1 Over 2.6 93% IOWA W L ›
Final
9-7 · #86
81
10-7 · #122
65
BOIS -1.5 145.5 BOIS -0.7 WYO +0.8 148.0 Over 2.5 52% BOIS L W ›
Final
12-4 · #341
50
6-10 · #306
66
SEMO -2.5 140.5 SEMO -1.1 UTM +1.4 143.8 Over 3.3 54% SEMO L L ›
Final
16-2 · #10
68
8-10 · #57
52
MSU -10.5 139.5 MSU -7.9 ORE +2.6 141.9 Over 2.4 75% MSU L L ›
Final
14-4 · #12
92
10-6 · #29
73
TTU -1.5 154.5 TTU -1.9 TTU +0.4 158.6 Over 4.1 57% TTU W W ›
Final
15-3 · #34
74
13-5 · #54
72
MIZ -1.5 163.5 UGA -3.7 UGA +5.2 168.3 Over 4.8 63% UGA W L ›
Final
9-9 · #73
78
9-9 · #83
81
KSU -10.5 168.5 KSU -6.0 UTAH +4.5 167.0 Under 1.5 70% KSU W W ›
Final
13-5 · #55
91
11-7 · #89
79
WAKE -1.5 157.5 SMU -1.5 SMU +3.0 160.5 Over 3.0 55% SMU W W ›
Final
3-15 · #220
52
10-7 · #87
81
CSU -19.5 133.5 CSU -19.4 AF +0.1 134.4 Over 0.9 96% CSU L L ›
Final
11-7 · #21
78
11-7 · #46
66
AUB -3.5 151.5 AUB -4.9 AUB +1.4 155.5 Over 4.0 66% AUB W L ›
Final
16-2 · #22
68
13-5 · #18
93
ARK -1.5 173.5 ARK -1.0 VAN +0.5 173.0 Under 0.5 53% ARK L W ›
Final
17-1 · #23
67
12-6 · #26
69
PUR -5.5 147.5 PUR -7.4 PUR +1.9 146.8 Under 0.7 74% PUR L W ›
Final
5-12 · #143
54
13-5 · #96
87
NEV -16.5 137.5 NEV -13.0 SJSU +3.5 144.0 Over 6.5 87% NEV L W ›
Final
8-8 · #98
86
14-2 · #58
76
USU -15.5 156.5 USU -15.0 UNLV +0.5 159.4 Over 2.9 91% USU W W ›
Final
13-5 · #16
75
12-6 · #65
69
KU -4.5 155.5 KU -6.7 KU +2.2 156.1 Over 0.6 72% KU W L ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record