Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games2929 final · 0 to play
Lines moved231+ pt since the open · 29 with a line
Totals moved241+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS15-1452% covered
Upsets6outright
Over / Under13-1645% over
Model Favorite22-776% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
DUKE @ LOULOU -2.5 → DUKE -1.54 → DUKE160.5 → 161.5▲ 1
CIN @ WVUWVU -2.5 → CIN -1.54 → CIN128.5 → 132.5▲ 4
WMU @ M-OHM-OH -11.5 → M-OH -14.53 → M-OH161.5 → 160.5▼ 1
LIN @ SIUELIN -1.5 → SIUE -1.53 → SIUE141.5 → 142.5▲ 1
TCU @ KUKU -7.5 → KU -6.51 → TCU137.5 → 143.5▲ 6
MASS @ OHIOOHIO -3.5 → OHIO -4.51 → OHIO155.5 → 160.5▲ 5
MICH @ PSUMICH -25.5 → MICH -24.51 → PSU164.5 → 169.5▲ 5
TOL @ NIUTOL -6.5 → TOL -7.51 → TOL156.5 → 161.5▲ 5
SDSU @ NEVNEV -1.5 → NEV -1.5no move146.5 → 141.5▼ 5
BGSU @ KENTKENT -1.5 → KENT -3.52 → KENT158.5 → 155.5▼ 3
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalConference
8-6 · #209
83
Ohio
6-7 · #128
86
Spread
OHIO -4.5
✓ MASS W ATS
Total
160.5 ▲5
▲ Over 169
Projected
78–82
✓ OHIO won
Model: MASS by 0.2 ✓
FinalConference
13-0 · #8 AP #2
74
9-5 · #78
72
Spread
MICH -24.5
✓ PSU W ATS
Total
169.5 ▲5
▼ Under 146
Projected
93–70
✓ MICH won
Model: PSU by 0.9 ✓ Model: Under 6.5 ✓
FinalConference
Duke
13-1 · #3 AP #6
84
11-3 · #14 AP #20
73
Spread
DUKE -1.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲1
▼ Under 157
Projected
79–80
✗ LOU lost
Model: LOU by 1.9 ✗ Model: Under 2.8 ✓
FinalConference
13-1 · #34 AP #18
77
9-5 · #1
92
Spread
FLA -9.5
✓ FLA W ATS
Total
172.5 ▲2
▼ Under 169
Projected
83–89
✓ FLA won
Model: UGA by 2.8 ✗ Model: Under 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
8-6 · #30
60
9-5 · #47
62
Spread
CIN -1.5
✓ WVU W ATS
Total
132.5 ▲4
▼ Under 122
Projected
65–67
✓ WVU won
Model: WVU by 4.1 ✓ Model: Under 0.2 ✓
FinalConference
9-5 · #9
84
10-5 · #72
70
Spread
SJU -4.5
✓ SJU W ATS
Total
162.5
▼ Under 154
Projected
84–79
✓ SJU won
Model: SJU by 1.0 ✓ Model: Over 0.4 ✗
FinalConference
9-5 · #63
82
10-5 · #94
72
Spread
SYR -2.5
✓ SYR W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲1
▲ Over 154
Projected
75–72
✓ SYR won
Model: SYR by 0.4 ✓ Model: Under 0.2 ✗
FinalConference
5-7 · #187
76
12-0 · #125
87
Spread
M-OH -14.5
✓ WMU W ATS
Total
160.5 ▼1
▲ Over 163
Projected
74–86
✓ M-OH won
Model: WMU by 2.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗
FinalConference
6-8 · #188
74
2-10 · #181
52
Spread
BALL -1.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
137.5 ▲3
▼ Under 126
Projected
69–67
✓ EMU won
Model: EMU by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.0 ✓
FinalConference
2-11 · #270
69
8-4 · #118
82
Spread
AKR -23.5
✓ CMU W ATS
Total
164.5
▼ Under 151
Projected
72–93
✓ AKR won
Model: CMU by 2.4 ✓ Model: Over 0.3 ✗
FinalConference
8-4 · #200
93
9-3 · #151
96
Spread
KENT -3.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼3
▲ Over 189
Projected
79–80
✓ KENT won
Model: BGSU by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 3.7 ✓
FinalConference
9-5 · #79
78
LSU
12-2 · #51
68
Spread
LSU -7.5
✓ SC W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼2
▲ Over 146
Projected
73–83
✗ LSU lost
Model: LSU by 2.3 ✗ Model: Over 9.8 ✓
FinalConference
Iowa
12-2 · #43 AP #19
67
9-5 · #70
70
Spread
IOWA -4.5
✓ MINN W ATS
Total
130.5 ▼1
▲ Over 137
Projected
72–65
✗ IOWA lost
Model: IOWA by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 6.5 ✓
FinalConference
UCF
12-1 · #39 AP #25
76
12-2 · #45
87
Spread
OKST -1.5
✓ OKST W ATS
Total
175.5
▼ Under 163
Projected
86–88
✓ OKST won
Model: OKST by 0.1 ✓ Model: Under 2.1 ✓
FinalConference
10-4 · #101
72
11-4 · #91
79
Spread
DAY -2.5
✓ DAY W ATS
Total
154.5
▼ Under 151
Projected
77–79
✓ DAY won
Model: GW by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 0.7 ✗
FinalConference
9-5 · #64
50
9-6 · #66
56
Spread
DEP -2.5
✓ DEP W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼1
▼ Under 106
Projected
73–76
✓ DEP won
Model: DEP by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 4.4 ✗
FinalConference
6-6 · #157
75
3-9 · #334
61
Spread
TOL -7.5
✓ TOL W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲5
▼ Under 136
Projected
83–76
✓ TOL won
Model: NIU by 0.2 ✗ Model: Under 3.0 ✓
FinalConference
7-5 · #258
62
SIUE
6-6 · #256
66
Spread
SIUE -1.5
✓ SIUE W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲1
▼ Under 128
Projected
73–72
✗ LIN lost
Model: LIN by 2.1 ✗ Model: Over 2.4 ✗
FinalConference
11-3 · #12 AP #14
65
13-1 · #2 AP #7
69
Spread
HOU -7.5
✓ TTU W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲2
▼ Under 134
Projected
68–74
✓ HOU won
Model: TTU by 1.8 ✓ Model: Under 1.2 ✓
FinalConference
8-5 · #11
71
10-4 · #7 AP #21
85
Spread
TENN -12.5
✓ TENN W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲1
▲ Over 156
Projected
74–82
✓ TENN won
Model: TEX by 4.7 ✗ Model: Over 2.3 ✓
FinalConference
TCU
11-3 · #40
100
10-4 · #16 AP #22
104
Spread
KU -6.5
✓ TCU W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲6
▲ Over 204
Projected
67–74
✓ KU won
Model: KU by 0.2 ✗ Model: Under 1.9 ✗
FinalConference
10-3 · #82
80
9-4 · #87
70
Spread
UNM -1.5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼1
▲ Over 150
Projected
73–73
✓ UNM won
Model: CSU by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓
FinalConference
UCLA
10-4 · #26
72
9-5 · #41
80
Spread
WIS -3.5
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
152.5
▼ Under 152
Projected
76–77
✓ WIS won
Model: UCLA by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 0.7 ✗
FinalConference
10-5 · #48
79
7-7 · #95
71
Spread
NCSU -11.5
✓ BC W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲1
▲ Over 150
Projected
79–68
✓ NCSU won
Model: BC by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 5.5 ✓
FinalConference
11-1 · #58
99
3-11 · #220
62
Spread
USU -22.5
✓ USU W ATS
Total
139.5 ▲2
▲ Over 161
Projected
81–59
✓ USU won
Model: AF by 0.4 ✗ Model: Under 0.1 ✗
FinalConference
11-3 · #28
90
9-5 · #21
88
Spread
AUB -6.5
✓ TA&M W ATS
Total
168.5 ▲1
▲ Over 178
Projected
84–89
✗ AUB lost
Model: TA&M by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 4.7 ✓
FinalConference
UNLV
6-6 · #98
66
9-4 · #122
98
Spread
WYO -4.5
✓ WYO W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼3
▲ Over 164
Projected
76–80
✓ WYO won
Model: UNLV by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 2.1 ✓
FinalConference
5-8 · #174
70
4-9 · #143
55
Spread
FRES -1.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲4
▼ Under 125
Projected
73–75
✗ SJSU lost
Model: SJSU by 4.0 ✗ Model: Under 1.8 ✓
FinalConference
8-4 · #75
73
11-3 · #96
68
Spread
NEV -1.5
✓ SDSU W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼5
▼ Under 141
Projected
74–75
✗ NEV lost
Model: SDSU by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 8.0 ✗
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
8-6 · #209
83
6-7 · #128
86
OHIO -4.5 160.5 OHIO -4.3 MASS +0.2 160.5 — 65% OHIO W ›
Final
13-0 · #8
74
9-5 · #78
72
MICH -24.5 169.5 MICH -23.6 PSU +0.9 163.0 Under 6.5 98% MICH W W ›
Final
13-1 · #3
84
11-3 · #14
73
DUKE -1.5 161.5 LOU -0.4 LOU +1.9 158.7 Under 2.8 51% LOU L W ›
Final
13-1 · #34
77
9-5 · #1
92
FLA -9.5 172.5 FLA -6.7 UGA +2.8 172.2 Under 0.3 72% FLA L W ›
Final
8-6 · #30
60
9-5 · #47
62
CIN -1.5 132.5 WVU -2.6 WVU +4.1 132.3 Under 0.2 59% WVU W W ›
Final
9-5 · #9
84
10-5 · #72
70
SJU -4.5 162.5 SJU -5.5 SJU +1.0 162.9 Over 0.4 68% SJU W L ›
Final
9-5 · #63
82
10-5 · #94
72
SYR -2.5 146.5 SYR -2.9 SYR +0.4 146.3 Under 0.2 60% SYR W L ›
Final
5-7 · #187
76
12-0 · #125
87
M-OH -14.5 160.5 M-OH -12.0 WMU +2.5 160.0 Under 0.5 85% M-OH W L ›
Final
6-8 · #188
74
2-10 · #181
52
BALL -1.5 137.5 EMU -2.0 EMU +3.5 136.5 Under 1.0 57% EMU W W ›
Final
2-11 · #270
69
8-4 · #118
82
AKR -23.5 164.5 AKR -21.1 CMU +2.4 164.8 Over 0.3 97% AKR W L ›
Final
8-4 · #200
93
9-3 · #151
96
KENT -3.5 155.5 KENT -1.2 BGSU +2.3 159.2 Over 3.7 54% KENT W W ›
Final
9-5 · #79
78
12-2 · #51
68
LSU -7.5 145.5 LSU -9.8 LSU +2.3 155.3 Over 9.8 80% LSU L W ›
Final
12-2 · #43
67
9-5 · #70
70
IOWA -4.5 130.5 IOWA -6.3 IOWA +1.8 137.0 Over 6.5 71% IOWA L W ›
Final
12-1 · #39
76
12-2 · #45
87
OKST -1.5 175.5 OKST -1.6 OKST +0.1 173.4 Under 2.1 56% OKST W W ›
Final
10-4 · #101
72
11-4 · #91
79
DAY -2.5 154.5 DAY -2.3 GW +0.2 155.2 Over 0.7 58% DAY L L ›
Final
9-5 · #64
50
9-6 · #66
56
DEP -2.5 144.5 DEP -2.8 DEP +0.3 148.9 Over 4.4 60% DEP W L ›
Final
6-6 · #157
75
3-9 · #334
61
TOL -7.5 161.5 TOL -7.3 NIU +0.2 158.5 Under 3.0 74% TOL L W ›
Final
7-5 · #258
62
6-6 · #256
66
SIUE -1.5 142.5 LIN -0.6 LIN +2.1 144.9 Over 2.4 52% LIN L L ›
Final
11-3 · #12
65
13-1 · #2
69
HOU -7.5 142.5 HOU -5.7 TTU +1.8 141.3 Under 1.2 69% HOU W W ›
Final
8-5 · #11
71
10-4 · #7
85
TENN -12.5 153.5 TENN -7.8 TEX +4.7 155.8 Over 2.3 75% TENN L W ›
Final
11-3 · #40
100
10-4 · #16
104
KU -6.5 143.5 KU -6.7 KU +0.2 141.6 Under 1.9 72% KU L L ›
Final
10-3 · #82
80
9-4 · #87
70
UNM -1.5 143.5 UNM -0.5 CSU +1.0 146.0 Over 2.5 52% UNM L W ›
Final
10-4 · #26
72
9-5 · #41
80
WIS -3.5 152.5 WIS -1.7 UCLA +1.8 153.2 Over 0.7 56% WIS L L ›
Final
10-5 · #48
79
7-7 · #95
71
NCSU -11.5 141.5 NCSU -11.2 BC +0.3 147.0 Over 5.5 84% NCSU W W ›
Final
11-1 · #58
99
3-11 · #220
62
USU -22.5 139.5 USU -22.1 AF +0.4 139.4 Under 0.1 97% USU L L ›
Final
11-3 · #28
90
9-5 · #21
88
AUB -6.5 168.5 AUB -5.7 TA&M +0.8 173.2 Over 4.7 69% AUB W W ›
Final
6-6 · #98
66
9-4 · #122
98
WYO -4.5 154.5 WYO -4.3 UNLV +0.3 156.6 Over 2.1 64% WYO L W ›
Final
5-8 · #174
70
4-9 · #143
55
FRES -1.5 149.5 SJSU -2.5 SJSU +4.0 147.8 Under 1.8 59% SJSU L W ›
Final
8-4 · #75
73
11-3 · #96
68
NEV -1.5 141.5 NEV -1.2 SDSU +0.3 149.5 Over 8.0 54% NEV W L ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record