Day in numbers52 finalFavorites 29-23 ATS9 upsetsO/U 28-24Model Favorite 44-8Open
Lines moved461+ pt since the open · 52 with a line
Totals moved461+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS29-2356% covered
Upsets9outright
Over / Under28-2454% over
Model Favorite44-885% won
GameSpread, open → nowMovedTotalMoved
DRKE @ EVANDRKE -3.5 → EVAN -2.56 → EVAN144.5 → 141.5▼ 3
ETAM @ TA&MTA&M -26.5 → TA&M -28.52 → TA&M157.5 → 166.5▲ 9
COFC @ NKUNKU -1.5 → NKU -5.54 → NKU151.5 → 153.5▲ 2
UNH @ SLUSLU -32.5 → SLU -34.52 → SLU149.5 → 157.5▲ 8
SHSU @ NMSUNMSU -1.5 → NMSU -5.54 → NMSU156.5 → 153.5▼ 3
UCI vs NDSUUCI -2.5 → NDSU -1.54 → NDSU142.5 → 146.5▲ 4
EKU @ WICHWICH -13.5 → WICH -14.51 → WICH141.5 → 148.5▲ 7
COLG @ FLAFLA -30.5 → FLA -27.53 → COLG153.5 → 156.5▲ 3
UML @ BUBU -2.5 → BU -5.53 → BU148.5 → 145.5▼ 3
PITT vs PSUPITT -1.5 → PSU -1.53 → PSU146.5 → 146.5no move
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Non-conference
4-5 · #210
0
0-11 · #335
0
Spread
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.1
Spread edge
—
model APSU -5.0
FinalNon-conference
4-5 · #211
60
7-4 · #1 AP #23
90
Spread
FLA -27.5
✓ FLA W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲3
▼ Under 150
Projected
65–93
✓ FLA won
Model: FLA by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-8 · #307
76
3-8 · #261
88
Spread
BU -5.5
✓ BU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼3
▲ Over 164
Projected
74–78
✓ BU won
Model: UML by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 5.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-6 · #117
85
6-4 · #230
74
Spread
NKU -5.5
✓ COFC W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲2
▲ Over 159
Projected
76–78
✗ NKU lost
Model: COFC by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
Pitt
6-6 · #74
80
8-3 · #78
46
Spread
PSU -1.5
✓ PITT W ATS
Total
146.5
▼ Under 126
Projected
75–75
✗ PSU lost
Model: PITT by 1.2 ✓ Model: Over 3.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
11-0 · #22 AP #13
98
9-3 · #89
67
Spread
VAN -5.5
✓ VAN W ATS
Total
164.5 ▲6
▲ Over 165
Projected
85–80
✓ VAN won
Model: WAKE by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Lehigh
2-8 · #216
62
4-7 · #155
76
Spread
MONM -9.5
✓ MONM W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼1
▼ Under 138
Projected
70–77
✓ MONM won
Model: LEH by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 2.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
8-3 · #241
66
6-4 · #166
74
Spread
HOF -7.5
✓ HOF W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼1
▼ Under 140
Projected
70–77
✓ HOF won
Model: QUIN by 1.3 ✗ Model: Under 0.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-7 · #309
67
Baylor
8-2 · #29
111
Spread
BAY -26.5
✓ BAY W ATS
Total
169.5 ▲5
▲ Over 178
Projected
73–96
✓ BAY won
Model: SOU by 3.0 ✗ Model: Under 0.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
7-4 · #46
62
8-4 · #48
76
Spread
NCSU -7.5
✓ NCSU W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲1
▼ Under 138
Projected
74–79
✓ NCSU won
Model: MISS by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 4.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
6-4 · #191
51
Marist
6-3 · #236
70
Spread
MRST -6.5
✓ MRST W ATS
Total
137.5 ▲2
▼ Under 121
Projected
64–71
✓ MRST won
Model: MRST by 0.3 ✓ Model: Under 3.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-3 · #148
81
8-3 · #15 AP #16
92
Spread
ALA -20.5
✓ KENN W ATS
Total
182.5 ▲4
▼ Under 173
Projected
81–103
✓ ALA won
Model: ALA by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 1.8 ✗
FinalConference
9-3 · #132
85
5-5 · #176
79
Spread
MUR -5.5
✓ MUR W ATS
Total
155.5
▲ Over 164
Projected
81–76
✓ MUR won
Model: VAL by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.9 ✓
FinalConference
5-6 · #195
69
7-4 · #167
73
Spread
BRAD -6.5
✓ SIU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲4
▼ Under 142
Projected
75–79
✓ BRAD won
Model: SIU by 1.7 ✓ Model: Over 1.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-7 · #183
81
3-8 · #330
87
Spread
PRES -2.5
✓ MAN W ATS
Total
138.5 ▲1
▲ Over 168
Projected
74–71
✗ PRES lost
Model: Over 6.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-5 · #326
76
Furman
5-4 · #152
84
Spread
FUR -10.5
✓ CHSO W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲3
▲ Over 160
Projected
71–80
✓ FUR won
Model: CHSO by 1.6 ✓ Model: Under 3.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
UIC
3-7 · #110
76
4-7 · #141
88
Spread
CLT -1.5
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
137.5 ▼3
▲ Over 164
Projected
70–73
✓ CLT won
Model: CLT by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 4.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Maine
1-12 · #323
56
Drexel
4-7 · #262
74
Spread
DREX -10.5
✓ DREX W ATS
Total
129.5 ▲1
▲ Over 130
Projected
60–68
✓ DREX won
Model: ME by 2.3 ✗ Model: Under 1.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-8 · #314
79
9-1 · #93
86
Spread
GMU -23.5
✓ L-MD W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼1
▲ Over 165
Projected
61–83
✓ GMU won
Model: L-MD by 1.3 ✓ Model: Under 2.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-7 · #240
82
SMU
9-2 · #55
99
Spread
SMU -24.5
✓ CARK W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲4
▲ Over 181
Projected
67–90
✓ SMU won
Model: CARK by 1.9 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-6 · #249
72
9-3 · #71
69
Spread
ND -11.5
✓ PFW W ATS
Total
149.5
▼ Under 141
Projected
68–84
✗ ND lost
Model: ND by 4.1 ✗ Model: Over 2.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-7 · #312
89
10-1 · #45
94
Spread
OKST -19.5
✓ CSUF W ATS
Total
176.5
▲ Over 183
Projected
76–97
✓ OKST won
Model: OKST by 2.1 ✗ Model: Under 3.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
VMI
2-7 · #320
90
3-8 · #246
97
Spread
RAD -11.5
✓ VMI W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲3
▲ Over 187
Projected
73–83
✓ RAD won
Model: VMI by 1.7 ✓ Model: Under 2.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-11 · #348
52
8-3 · #7 AP #20
94
Spread
TENN -42.5
✓ GWEB W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲4
▼ Under 146
Projected
56–95
✓ TENN won
Model: GWEB by 3.4 ✓ Model: Under 1.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-5 · #179
83
1-9 · #301
75
Spread
COR -6.5
✓ COR W ATS
Total
167.5 ▼1
▼ Under 158
Projected
88–82
✓ COR won
Model: UALB by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 2.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-7 · #227
73
4-5 · #328
66
Spread
UTC -2.5
✓ UTC W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼1
▲ Over 139
Projected
73–71
✓ UTC won
Model: AAMU by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 4.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-7 · #271
47
UAB
7-4 · #102
72
Spread
UAB -13.5
✓ UAB W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼2
▼ Under 119
Projected
71–84
✓ UAB won
Model: UAB by 0.1 ✓ Model: Over 3.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
UMBC
4-5 · #264
69
6-5 · #84
94
Spread
USF -22.5
✓ USF W ATS
Total
160.5 ▲2
▲ Over 163
Projected
70–90
✓ USF won
Model: UMBC by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-6 · #321
66
2-6 · #289
90
Spread
UIW -6.5
✓ UIW W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼1
▲ Over 156
Projected
68–74
✓ UIW won
Model: NAU by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 1.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
6-6 · #99
78
9-3 · #60
75
Spread
ASU -12.5
✓ ORST W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 153
Projected
70–82
✗ ASU lost
Model: ORST by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 3.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-7 · #286
79
10-1 · #69
93
Spread
SLU -34.5
✓ UNH W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲8
▲ Over 172
Projected
61–91
✓ SLU won
Model: UNH by 4.9 ✓ Model: Under 5.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
7-4 · #30
65
9-3 · #35
68
Spread
CLEM -3.5
✓ CIN W ATS
Total
140.5 ▲3
▼ Under 133
Projected
69–72
✓ CLEM won
Model: Over 0.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-8 · #124
50
10-0 · #8 AP #2
102
Spread
MICH -40.5
✓ MICH W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲4
▼ Under 152
Projected
57–94
✓ MICH won
Model: LAS by 3.6 ✗ Model: Under 5.3 ✓
FinalConference
Drake
4-6 · #144
66
2-8 · #255
65
Spread
EVAN -2.5
✓ DRKE W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼3
▼ Under 131
Projected
73–69
✓ DRKE won
Model: DRKE by 6.8 ✓ Model: Over 0.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-5 · #342
77
8-3 · #28
118
Spread
TA&M -28.5
✓ TA&M W ATS
Total
166.5 ▲9
▲ Over 195
Projected
66–91
✓ TA&M won
Model: ETAM by 4.1 ✗ Model: Under 9.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-6 · #327
56
TCU
8-3 · #40
80
Spread
TCU -29.5
✓ FAMU W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲3
▼ Under 136
Projected
56–85
✓ TCU won
Model: FAMU by 0.9 ✓ Model: Under 1.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-9 · #333
67
Miami
10-2 · #25
105
Spread
MIA -37.5
✓ MIA W ATS
Total
171.5 ▲3
▲ Over 172
Projected
68–98
✓ MIA won
Model: UNF by 7.6 ✗ Model: Under 4.7 ✗
FinalConference
5-3 · #189
78
4-3 · #133
87
Spread
NMSU -5.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼3
▲ Over 165
Projected
75–78
✓ NMSU won
Model: SHSU by 2.4 ✗ Model: Under 0.6 ✗
FinalConference
UConn
11-1 · #6 AP #5
72
DePaul
8-4 · #66
54
Spread
CONN -12.5
✓ CONN W ATS
Total
133.5 ▼3
▼ Under 126
Projected
77–62
✓ CONN won
Model: CONN by 1.9 ✓ Model: Over 5.7 ✗
FinalConference
5-5 · #207
65
8-3 · #116
85
Spread
ILST -13.5
✓ ILST W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲4
▼ Under 150
Projected
71–82
✓ ILST won
Model: INST by 2.3 ✗ Model: Over 0.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-8 · #294
57
6-5 · #77
88
Spread
WICH -14.5
✓ WICH W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲7
▼ Under 145
Projected
68–82
✓ WICH won
Model: EKU by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 2.1 ✗
FinalConference
4-6 · #235
81
1-9 · #315
71
Spread
MILW -6.5
✓ MILW W ATS
Total
160.5 ▼1
▼ Under 152
Projected
84–79
✓ MILW won
Model: CLE by 0.7 ✗ Model: Over 2.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
8-2 · #170
56
10-1 · #92
74
Spread
CAL -8.5
✓ CAL W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲4
▼ Under 130
Projected
72–81
✓ CAL won
Model: CAL by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-9 · #297
60
11-0 · #13 AP #4
91
Spread
ISU -37.5
✓ LBSU W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼2
▲ Over 151
Projected
59–94
✓ ISU won
Model: LBSU by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 3.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
11-1 · #17 AP #7
91
Oregon
6-5 · #57
82
Spread
GONZ -12.5
✓ ORE W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼4
▲ Over 173
Projected
86–72
✓ GONZ won
Model: GONZ by 1.9 ✗ Model: Over 1.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-6 · #243
50
6-5 · #70
78
Spread
MINN -13.5
✓ MINN W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲2
▼ Under 128
Projected
66–80
✓ MINN won
Model: MINN by 0.1 ✓ Model: Over 0.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-5 · #182
93
4-5 · #344
83
Spread
IDST -5.5
✓ UCD W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲3
▲ Over 176
Projected
69–73
✗ IDST lost
Model: UCD by 1.6 ✓ Model: Under 1.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-9 · #345
64
6-5 · #161
94
Spread
SF -25.5
✓ SF W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼2
▲ Over 158
Projected
64–87
✓ SF won
Model: MORG by 2.0 ✗ Model: Over 5.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-5 · #149
74
7-3 · #213
73
Spread
NDSU -1.5
✓ UCI W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲4
▲ Over 147
Projected
71–71
✗ NDSU lost
Model: UCI by 1.3 ✓ Model: Under 4.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-7 · #285
82
6-4 · #163
95
Spread
PAC -8.5
✓ PAC W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼3
▲ Over 177
Projected
67–75
✓ PAC won
Model: NICH by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 2.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Idaho
4-4 · #247
83
3-8 · #164
80
Spread
IDHO -1.5
✓ IDHO W ATS
Total
167.5
▼ Under 163
Projected
84–81
✓ IDHO won
Model: IDHO by 0.7 ✓ Model: Under 2.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-9 · #336
55
11-0 · #27 AP #15
78
Spread
NEB -29.5
✓ UND W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲3
▼ Under 133
Projected
61–90
✓ NEB won
Model: UND by 1.1 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-8 · #319
72
UTEP
0-6 · #190
71
Spread
UTEP -10.5
✓ NORF W ATS
Total
136.5 ▲5
▲ Over 143
Projected
64–70
✗ UTEP lost
Model: NORF by 4.6 ✓ Model: Under 2.3 ✗
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
4-5 · #210
0
0-11 · #335
0
— — APSU -5.0 — 142.1 — 67% APSU ›
Final
4-5 · #211
60
7-4 · #1
90
FLA -27.5 156.5 FLA -27.8 FLA +0.3 157.3 Over 0.8 99% FLA W L ›
Final
2-8 · #307
76
3-8 · #261
88
BU -5.5 145.5 BU -4.1 UML +1.4 151.1 Over 5.6 64% BU L W ›
Final
5-6 · #117
85
6-4 · #230
74
NKU -5.5 153.5 NKU -2.0 COFC +3.5 153.4 Under 0.1 57% NKU W L ›
Final
6-6 · #74
80
8-3 · #78
46
PSU -1.5 146.5 PSU -0.3 PITT +1.2 149.7 Over 3.2 51% PSU W L ›
Final
11-0 · #22
98
9-3 · #89
67
VAN -5.5 164.5 VAN -4.3 WAKE +1.2 165.0 Over 0.5 65% VAN L W ›
Final
2-8 · #216
62
4-7 · #155
76
MONM -9.5 143.5 MONM -7.1 LEH +2.4 146.4 Over 2.9 73% MONM L L ›
Final
8-3 · #241
66
6-4 · #166
74
HOF -7.5 147.5 HOF -6.2 QUIN +1.3 146.8 Under 0.7 71% HOF L W ›
Final
1-7 · #309
67
8-2 · #29
111
BAY -26.5 169.5 BAY -23.5 SOU +3.0 169.3 Under 0.2 98% BAY L L ›
Final
7-4 · #46
62
8-4 · #48
76
NCSU -7.5 148.5 NCSU -5.1 MISS +2.4 153.2 Over 4.7 67% NCSU L L ›
Final
6-4 · #191
51
6-3 · #236
70
MRST -6.5 137.5 MRST -6.8 MRST +0.3 134.3 Under 3.2 72% MRST W W ›
Final
5-3 · #148
81
8-3 · #15
92
ALA -20.5 182.5 ALA -22.3 ALA +1.8 184.3 Over 1.8 97% ALA L L ›
Final
9-3 · #132
85
5-5 · #176
79
MUR -5.5 155.5 MUR -5.0 VAL +0.5 156.4 Over 0.9 67% MUR L W ›
Final
5-6 · #195
69
7-4 · #167
73
BRAD -6.5 152.5 BRAD -4.8 SIU +1.7 153.9 Over 1.4 66% BRAD W L ›
Final
4-7 · #183
81
3-8 · #330
87
PRES -2.5 138.5 PRES -2.5 — 144.6 Over 6.1 59% PRES W ›
Final
5-5 · #326
76
5-4 · #152
84
FUR -10.5 155.5 FUR -8.9 CHSO +1.6 151.7 Under 3.8 78% FUR W L ›
Final
3-7 · #110
76
4-7 · #141
88
CLT -1.5 137.5 CLT -2.8 CLT +1.3 142.1 Over 4.6 60% CLT W W ›
Final
1-12 · #323
56
4-7 · #262
74
DREX -10.5 129.5 DREX -8.2 ME +2.3 127.9 Under 1.6 76% DREX L L ›
Final
2-8 · #314
79
9-1 · #93
86
GMU -23.5 146.5 GMU -22.2 L-MD +1.3 143.9 Under 2.6 97% GMU W L ›
Final
3-7 · #240
82
9-2 · #55
99
SMU -24.5 156.5 SMU -22.6 CARK +1.9 157.0 Over 0.5 98% SMU W W ›
Final
4-6 · #249
72
9-3 · #71
69
ND -11.5 149.5 ND -15.6 ND +4.1 151.7 Over 2.2 91% ND L L ›
Final
3-7 · #312
89
10-1 · #45
94
OKST -19.5 176.5 OKST -21.6 OKST +2.1 173.2 Under 3.3 97% OKST L L ›
Final
2-7 · #320
90
3-8 · #246
97
RAD -11.5 158.5 RAD -9.8 VMI +1.7 156.1 Under 2.4 80% RAD W L ›
Final
0-11 · #348
52
8-3 · #7
94
TENN -42.5 152.5 TENN -39.1 GWEB +3.4 150.9 Under 1.6 100% TENN W W ›
Final
4-5 · #179
83
1-9 · #301
75
COR -6.5 167.5 COR -5.9 UALB +0.6 169.9 Over 2.4 70% COR L L ›
Final
2-7 · #227
73
4-5 · #328
66
UTC -2.5 138.5 UTC -1.7 AAMU +0.8 143.2 Over 4.7 56% UTC L W ›
Final
3-7 · #271
47
7-4 · #102
72
UAB -13.5 151.5 UAB -13.6 UAB +0.1 155.1 Over 3.6 88% UAB W L ›
Final
4-5 · #264
69
6-5 · #84
94
USF -22.5 160.5 USF -20.0 UMBC +2.5 160.7 Over 0.2 96% USF L W ›
Final
3-6 · #321
66
2-6 · #289
90
UIW -6.5 140.5 UIW -6.4 NAU +0.1 141.5 Over 1.0 71% UIW L W ›
Final
6-6 · #99
78
9-3 · #60
75
ASU -12.5 147.5 ASU -11.9 ORST +0.6 151.4 Over 3.9 85% ASU W W ›
Final
2-7 · #286
79
10-1 · #69
93
SLU -34.5 157.5 SLU -29.6 UNH +4.9 151.8 Under 5.7 100% SLU W L ›
Final
7-4 · #30
65
9-3 · #35
68
CLEM -3.5 140.5 CLEM -3.5 — 140.9 Over 0.4 62% CLEM L ›
Final
3-8 · #124
50
10-0 · #8
102
MICH -40.5 155.5 MICH -36.9 LAS +3.6 150.2 Under 5.3 100% MICH L W ›
Final
4-6 · #144
66
2-8 · #255
65
EVAN -2.5 141.5 DRKE -4.3 DRKE +6.8 141.7 Over 0.2 65% DRKE W L ›
Final
4-5 · #342
77
8-3 · #28
118
TA&M -28.5 166.5 TA&M -24.4 ETAM +4.1 157.3 Under 9.2 98% TA&M L L ›
Final
1-6 · #327
56
8-3 · #40
80
TCU -29.5 142.5 TCU -28.6 FAMU +0.9 141.1 Under 1.4 99% TCU W W ›
Final
0-9 · #333
67
10-2 · #25
105
MIA -37.5 171.5 MIA -29.9 UNF +7.6 166.8 Under 4.7 100% MIA L L ›
Final
5-3 · #189
78
4-3 · #133
87
NMSU -5.5 153.5 NMSU -3.1 SHSU +2.4 152.9 Under 0.6 61% NMSU L L ›
Final
11-1 · #6
72
8-4 · #66
54
CONN -12.5 133.5 CONN -14.4 CONN +1.9 139.2 Over 5.7 90% CONN W L ›
Final
5-5 · #207
65
8-3 · #116
85
ILST -13.5 152.5 ILST -11.2 INST +2.3 153.2 Over 0.7 84% ILST L L ›
Final
2-8 · #294
57
6-5 · #77
88
WICH -14.5 148.5 WICH -14.2 EKU +0.3 150.6 Over 2.1 89% WICH L L ›
Final
4-6 · #235
81
1-9 · #315
71
MILW -6.5 160.5 MILW -5.8 CLE +0.7 162.8 Over 2.3 69% MILW L L ›
Final
8-2 · #170
56
10-1 · #92
74
CAL -8.5 153.5 CAL -9.0 CAL +0.5 152.4 Under 1.1 78% CAL W W ›
Final
2-9 · #297
60
11-0 · #13
91
ISU -37.5 149.5 ISU -35.7 LBSU +1.8 152.9 Over 3.4 100% ISU W W ›
Final
11-1 · #17
91
6-5 · #57
82
GONZ -12.5 155.5 GONZ -14.4 GONZ +1.9 157.4 Over 1.9 90% GONZ L W ›
Final
3-6 · #243
50
6-5 · #70
78
MINN -13.5 145.5 MINN -13.6 MINN +0.1 145.8 Over 0.3 88% MINN W L ›
Final
4-5 · #182
93
4-5 · #344
83
IDST -5.5 143.5 IDST -3.9 UCD +1.6 142.3 Under 1.3 63% IDST W L ›
Final
1-9 · #345
64
6-5 · #161
94
SF -25.5 145.5 SF -23.5 MORG +2.0 150.5 Over 5.0 98% SF L W ›
Final
5-5 · #149
74
7-3 · #213
73
NDSU -1.5 146.5 NDSU -0.2 UCI +1.3 142.2 Under 4.3 51% NDSU W L ›
Final
2-7 · #285
82
6-4 · #163
95
PAC -8.5 139.5 PAC -8.1 NICH +0.4 142.4 Over 2.9 76% PAC L W ›
Final
4-4 · #247
83
3-8 · #164
80
IDHO -1.5 167.5 IDHO -2.2 IDHO +0.7 164.7 Under 2.8 58% IDHO W W ›
Final
3-9 · #336
55
11-0 · #27
78
NEB -29.5 151.5 NEB -28.4 UND +1.1 151.0 Under 0.5 99% NEB W W ›
Final
2-8 · #319
72
0-6 · #190
71
UTEP -10.5 136.5 UTEP -5.9 NORF +4.6 134.2 Under 2.3 70% UTEP W L ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record