Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games6464 final · 0 to play
Lines moved451+ pt since the open · 64 with a line
Totals moved541+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS30-3447% covered
Upsets16outright
Over / Under34-3053% over
Model Favorite41-2364% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
TTU vs DUKETTU -8.5 → DUKE -9.518 → DUKE150.5 → 152.5▲ 2
LEM @ SBUSBU -16.5 → SBU -21.55 → SBU152.5 → 151.5▼ 1
SJU vs UKSJU -2.5 → UK -1.54 → UK156.5 → 154.5▼ 2
BUF @ WMUWMU -1.5 → BUF -2.54 → BUF152.5 → 150.5▼ 2
UTM @ TNTCTNTC -1.5 → UTM -2.54 → UTM145.5 → 145.5no move
SDAK @ KSUKSU -20.5 → KSU -21.51 → KSU170.5 → 176.5▲ 6
GAST @ APPAPP -10.5 → APP -7.53 → GAST134.5 → 137.5▲ 3
M-OH @ BALLM-OH -10.5 → M-OH -7.53 → BALL146.5 → 147.5▲ 1
KENT @ MASSMASS -1.5 → KENT -1.53 → KENT167.5 → 163.5▼ 4
BGSU @ OHIOOHIO -1.5 → BGSU -1.53 → BGSU150.5 → 153.5▲ 3
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-6 · #204
70
10-1 · #10 AP #9
79
Spread
MSU -19.5
✓ OAK W ATS
Total
155.5
▼ Under 149
Projected
69–87
✓ MSU won
Model: OAK by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-5 · #273
54
9-2 · #14 AP #11
94
Spread
LOU -30.5
✓ LOU W ATS
Total
166.5 ▼1
▼ Under 148
Projected
68–96
✓ LOU won
Model: MONT by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-6 · #291
76
7-4 · #83
106
Spread
KSU -21.5
✓ KSU W ATS
Total
176.5 ▲6
▲ Over 182
Projected
77–97
✓ KSU won
Model: SDAK by 2.2 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
7-3 · #9 AP #22
66
7-4 · #19
78
Spread
UK -1.5
✓ UK W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼2
▼ Under 144
Projected
81–78
✗ SJU lost
Model: SJU by 4.8 ✗ Model: Over 4.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-3 · #160
64
9-3 · #91
61
Spread
DAY -9.5
✓ LIB W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼1
▼ Under 125
Projected
67–78
✗ DAY lost
Model: DAY by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 2.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
5-6 · #325
65
5-5 · #265
74
Spread
YSU -6.5
✓ YSU W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼1
▼ Under 139
Projected
71–77
✓ YSU won
Model: Over 6.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-10 · #362
58
8-3 · #38
78
Spread
IU -38.5
✓ CHST W ATS
Total
152.5
▼ Under 136
Projected
59–93
✓ IU won
Model: CHST by 5.0 ✓ Model: Under 0.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-6 · #332
81
9-2 · #142
92
Spread
SBU -21.5
✓ LEM W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼1
▲ Over 173
Projected
67–84
✓ SBU won
Model: LEM by 4.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
8-2 · #237
88
5-5 · #187
71
Spread
BUF -2.5
✓ BUF W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼2
▲ Over 159
Projected
76–77
✗ WMU lost
Model: WMU by 3.2 ✗ Model: Over 2.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
7-4 · #168
79
70
Spread
RMU -13.5
✓ SFPA W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲2
▲ Over 149
Projected
81–69
✓ RMU won
Model: SFPA by 1.2 ✓ Model: Over 3.7 ✓
FinalConference
1-10 · #208
70
6-5 · #259
63
Spread
APP -7.5
✓ GAST W ATS
Total
137.5 ▲3
▼ Under 133
Projected
64–73
✗ APP lost
Model: APP by 2.0 ✗ Model: Under 0.7 ✓
FinalConference
8-2 · #87
58
8-1 · #58
100
Spread
USU -10.5
✓ USU W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼2
▲ Over 158
Projected
71–79
✓ USU won
Model: CSU by 3.0 ✗ Model: Over 2.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-5 · #197
67
9-1 · #120
66
Spread
UNCW -15.5
✓ HOW W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼2
▼ Under 133
Projected
64–79
✗ UNCW lost
Model: HOW by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 1.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-7 · #218
74
0-9 · #357
72
Spread
LONG -3.5
✓ NCCU W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼1
▼ Under 146
Projected
77–74
✓ LONG won
Model: NCCU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-9 · #310
81
7-4 · #94
95
Spread
GT -16.5
✓ LAF W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲3
▲ Over 176
Projected
64–80
✓ GT won
Model: LAF by 0.4 ✓ Model: Under 4.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
Iona
8-4 · #233
83
6-5 · #186
78
Spread
UVM -6.5
✓ IONA W ATS
Total
152.5
▲ Over 161
Projected
76–80
✗ UVM lost
Model: IONA by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-9 · #272
61
2-8 · #331
82
Spread
MERC -7.5
✓ MERC W ATS
Total
132.5 ▼5
▲ Over 143
Projected
65–73
✓ MERC won
Model: MERC by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 5.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Elon
6-4 · #232
81
10-2 · #68
82
Spread
VT -12.5
✓ ELON W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲1
▲ Over 163
Projected
75–88
✓ VT won
Model: VT by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 4.1 ✓
FinalConference
9-0 · #125
86
2-8 · #181
77
Spread
M-OH -7.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲1
▲ Over 163
Projected
78–70
✓ M-OH won
Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalConference
7-2 · #151
69
8-3 · #209
59
Spread
KENT -1.5
✓ KENT W ATS
Total
163.5 ▼4
▼ Under 128
Projected
83–84
✗ MASS lost
Model: MASS by 2.8 ✗ Model: Over 3.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-7 · #317
53
4-6 · #136
81
Spread
HARV -10.5
✓ HARV W ATS
Total
136.5 ▲1
▼ Under 134
Projected
64–73
✓ HARV won
Model: HC by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 1.3 ✗
FinalConference
7-4 · #231
63
Troy
5-5 · #147
70
Spread
TROY -4.5
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲4
▼ Under 133
Projected
79–83
✓ TROY won
Model: TROY by 0.2 ✓ Model: Over 6.6 ✗
FinalConference
5-6 · #283
76
3-8 · #234
74
Spread
ODU -3.5
✓ CCU W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲2
▲ Over 150
Projected
70–77
✗ ODU lost
Model: ODU by 2.7 ✗ Model: Under 0.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-7 · #263
86
6-2 · #219
79
Spread
UNCO -8.5
✓ DEN W ATS
Total
159.5 ▼3
▲ Over 165
Projected
79–88
✗ UNCO lost
Model: UNCO by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 7.4 ✓
FinalConference
2-7 · #270
73
2-7 · #334
74
Spread
NIU -2.5
✓ CMU W ATS
Total
149.5
▼ Under 147
Projected
75–75
✓ NIU won
Model: CMU by 2.2 ✓ Model: Over 0.8 ✗
FinalConference
1-11 · #221
76
1-9 · #358
62
Spread
UL -1.5
✓ UL W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼1
▲ Over 138
Projected
72–71
✓ UL won
Model: ULM by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 6.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
10-1 · #44 AP #12
71
8-2 · #33
70
Spread
UNC -2.5
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲5
▼ Under 141
Projected
80–79
✓ UNC won
Model: OSU by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 1.4 ✗
FinalConference
8-3 · #228
65
5-6 · #103
67
Spread
TXST -3.5
✓ USA W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼1
▼ Under 132
Projected
70–71
✓ TXST won
Model: USA by 3.2 ✓ Model: Over 4.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-6 · #76
66
6-5 · #53
71
Spread
MSST -3.5
✓ MSST W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲3
▼ Under 137
Projected
77–80
✓ MSST won
Model: MEM by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 3.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-6 · #198
81
ETSU
6-4 · #173
75
Spread
ETSU -9.5
✓ JXST W ATS
Total
134.5 ▲1
▲ Over 156
Projected
63–74
✗ ETSU lost
Model: ETSU by 1.6 ✗ Model: Over 1.8 ✓
FinalConference
6-4 · #80
82
8-2 · #122
70
Spread
WYO -2.5
✓ GCU W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 152
Projected
73–75
✗ WYO lost
Model: GCU by 0.7 ✓ Model: Under 0.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
7-4 · #59
58
8-3 · #72
61
Spread
BTLR -3.5
✓ NU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼4
▼ Under 119
Projected
81–81
✗ NU lost
Model: NU by 3.7 ✓ Model: Over 6.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-5 · #229
83
7-4 · #63
91
Spread
SYR -14.5
✓ NE W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼3
▲ Over 174
Projected
65–80
✓ SYR won
Model: SYR by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 4.0 ✓
FinalConference
6-3 · #200
68
Ohio
4-6 · #128
58
Spread
BGSU -1.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲3
▼ Under 126
Projected
77–77
✓ BGSU won
Model: OHIO by 1.3 ✗ Model: Over 1.1 ✗
FinalConference
5-4 · #341
86
3-6 · #282
62
Spread
UTM -2.5
✓ UTM W ATS
Total
145.5
▲ Over 148
Projected
72–74
✗ TNTC lost
Model: TNTC by 5.2 ✗ Model: Over 0.4 ✓
FinalConference
7-4 · #171
93
5-5 · #224
86
Spread
ARST -1.5
✓ ARST W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼1
▲ Over 179
Projected
81–79
✓ ARST won
Model: ARST by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 3.4 ✓
FinalConference
2-7 · #306
91
4-4 · #245
82
Spread
SEMO -1.5
✓ SEMO W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲1
▲ Over 173
Projected
76–78
✗ TNST lost
Model: TNST by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 2.7 ✓
FinalConference
2-7 · #350
64
Spread
MORE -1.5
✓ MORE W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼2
▼ Under 124
Projected
73–73
✗ USI lost
Model: USI by 2.0 ✗ Model: Over 0.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
FGCU
4-6 · #266
80
UCF
9-1 · #39
102
Spread
UCF -17.5
✓ UCF W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲4
▲ Over 182
Projected
74–91
✓ UCF won
Model: FGCU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 3.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-9 · #113
80
8-3 · #106
78
Spread
SCU -15.5
✓ LUC W ATS
Total
151.5
▲ Over 158
Projected
69–83
✗ SCU lost
Model: LUC by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 0.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-4 · #242
78
3-8 · #139
84
Spread
WSU -7.5
✓ MER W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼2
▲ Over 162
Projected
73–79
✓ WSU won
Model: MER by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 0.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
6-5 · #324
79
FIU
3-4 · #178
86
Spread
FIU -6.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲3
▲ Over 165
Projected
76–81
✓ FIU won
Model: LIU by 1.2 ✗ Model: Under 3.9 ✗
FinalConference
6-5 · #158
92
7-5 · #296
96
Spread
GASO -2.5
✓ GASO W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼5
▲ Over 188
Projected
78–80
✓ GASO won
Model: JMU by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 4.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
10-1 · #2 AP #8
94
9-2 · #18 AP #14
85
Spread
HOU -5.5
✓ HOU W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲3
▲ Over 179
Projected
76–70
✓ HOU won
Model: ARK by 0.1 ✗ Model: Under 0.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
6-5 · #50
72
9-1 · #20 AP #23
80
Spread
UVA -16.5
✓ MD W ATS
Total
153.5
▼ Under 152
Projected
71–81
✓ UVA won
Model: MD by 7.0 ✓ Model: Under 1.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-9 · #339
56
8-2 · #104
80
Spread
RICH -18.5
✓ RICH W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼1
▼ Under 136
Projected
64–85
✓ RICH won
Model: RICH by 1.9 ✓ Model: Over 2.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-9 · #299
39
Iowa
9-2 · #43
94
Spread
IOWA -25.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
133.5 ▼4
▼ Under 133
Projected
56–83
✓ IOWA won
Model: IOWA by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 6.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
8-3 · #21 AP #21
60
10-1 · #23 AP #6
88
Spread
PUR -7.5
✓ PUR W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼2
▼ Under 148
Projected
77–84
✓ PUR won
Model: AUB by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 8.4 ✗
FinalConference
5-5 · #174
72
UNLV
4-6 · #98
84
Spread
UNLV -8.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲3
▼ Under 156
Projected
76–83
✓ UNLV won
Model: FRES by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-7 · #279
85
3-5 · #293
82
Spread
LAM -5.5
✓ OMA W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼1
▲ Over 167
Projected
70–72
✗ LAM lost
Model: OMA by 2.8 ✓ Model: Over 0.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-9 · #254
77
Utah
7-4 · #73
101
Spread
UTAH -10.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
Total
160.5 ▲2
▲ Over 178
Projected
75–88
✓ UTAH won
Model: UTAH by 2.8 ✓ Model: Over 2.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-4 · #274
61
7-4 · #130
63
Spread
TULN -2.5
✓ PRST W ATS
Total
145.5
▼ Under 124
Projected
72–76
✓ TULN won
Model: TULN by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 2.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-6 · #281
78
7-4 · #212
92
Spread
STMN -14.5
✓ UCR W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲1
▲ Over 170
Projected
71–80
✓ STMN won
Model: UCR by 5.2 ✓ Model: Under 2.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-6 · #196
67
9-3 · #203
74
Spread
CBU -14.5
✓ SAC W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲6
▼ Under 141
Projected
67–81
✓ CBU won
Model: SAC by 1.3 ✓ Model: Under 10.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
9-2 · #85
77
10-1 · #65
68
Spread
COLO -2.5
✓ STAN W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼2
▼ Under 145
Projected
79–82
✗ COLO lost
Model: COLO by 0.7 ✗ Model: Over 5.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
Penn
5-4 · #137
69
5-6 · #62
70
Spread
RUTG -11.5
✓ PENN W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲1
▼ Under 139
Projected
69–81
✓ RUTG won
Model: PENN by 0.1 ✓ Model: Under 0.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
8-3 · #12 AP #19
82
Duke
11-0 · #3 AP #3
81
Spread
DUKE -9.5
✓ TTU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲2
▲ Over 163
Projected
71–79
✗ DUKE lost
Model: TTU by 1.8 ✓ Model: Under 2.1 ✗
FinalConference
8-4 · #49
80
8-3 · #64
77
Spread
GTWN -4.5
✓ XAV W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼1
▲ Over 157
Projected
75–79
✗ GTWN lost
Model: XAV by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 4.3 ✓
FinalConference
5-7 · #42
63
6-5 · #37
84
Spread
CREI -6.5
✓ CREI W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲2
▼ Under 147
Projected
71–79
✓ CREI won
Model: CREI by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.9 ✓
FinalConference
4-6 · #143
65
8-2 · #82
88
Spread
UNM -16.5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲6
▲ Over 153
Projected
69–81
✓ UNM won
Model: SJSU by 3.8 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
Rice
4-6 · #177
62
2-8 · #172
84
Spread
RICE -1.5
✓ PEPP W ATS
Total
140.5
▲ Over 146
Projected
73–72
✗ RICE lost
Model: PEPP by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 4.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-6 · #268
82
4-6 · #313
80
Spread
WEB -5.5
✓ UTU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲5
▲ Over 162
Projected
75–79
✗ WEB lost
Model: UTU by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 1.6 ✓
FinalConference
7-2 · #86
66
8-3 · #96
81
Spread
BOIS -3.5
✓ NEV W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲1
▲ Over 147
Projected
72–70
✗ BOIS lost
Model: NEV by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 0.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
6-3 · #75
45
10-0 · #5 AP #1
68
Spread
ARIZ -13.5
✓ ARIZ W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼3
▼ Under 113
Projected
70–86
✓ ARIZ won
Model: ARIZ by 2.6 ✓ Model: Over 2.8 ✗
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
5-6 · #204
70
10-1 · #10
79
MSU -19.5 155.5 MSU -18.0 OAK +1.5 155.6 Over 0.1 94% MSU W L ›
Final
3-5 · #273
54
9-2 · #14
94
LOU -30.5 166.5 LOU -28.0 MONT +2.5 164.2 Under 2.3 99% LOU L W ›
Final
5-6 · #291
76
7-4 · #83
106
KSU -21.5 176.5 KSU -19.3 SDAK +2.2 174.0 Under 2.5 95% KSU L L ›
Final
7-3 · #9
66
7-4 · #19
78
UK -1.5 154.5 SJU -3.3 SJU +4.8 159.1 Over 4.6 61% SJU L L ›
Final
4-3 · #160
64
9-3 · #91
61
DAY -9.5 142.5 DAY -10.6 DAY +1.1 145.3 Over 2.8 82% DAY L L ›
Final
5-6 · #325
65
5-5 · #265
74
YSU -6.5 141.5 YSU -6.5 — 147.5 Over 6.0 71% YSU L ›
Final
1-10 · #362
58
8-3 · #38
78
IU -38.5 152.5 IU -33.5 CHST +5.0 152.3 Under 0.2 100% IU W W ›
Final
4-6 · #332
81
9-2 · #142
92
SBU -21.5 151.5 SBU -17.0 LEM +4.5 151.8 Over 0.3 93% SBU W W ›
Final
8-2 · #237
88
5-5 · #187
71
BUF -2.5 150.5 WMU -0.7 WMU +3.2 153.1 Over 2.6 53% WMU L W ›
Final
7-4 · #168
79
RMU -13.5 145.5 RMU -12.3 SFPA +1.2 149.2 Over 3.7 86% RMU W W ›
Final
1-10 · #208
70
6-5 · #259
63
APP -7.5 137.5 APP -9.5 APP +2.0 136.8 Under 0.7 80% APP L W ›
Final
8-2 · #87
58
8-1 · #58
100
USU -10.5 147.5 USU -7.5 CSU +3.0 150.2 Over 2.7 75% USU L W ›
Final
5-5 · #197
67
9-1 · #120
66
UNCW -15.5 141.5 UNCW -14.7 HOW +0.8 143.4 Over 1.9 90% UNCW W L ›
Final
4-7 · #218
74
0-9 · #357
72
LONG -3.5 146.5 LONG -3.0 NCCU +0.5 151.3 Over 4.8 60% LONG W L ›
Final
2-9 · #310
81
7-4 · #94
95
GT -16.5 147.5 GT -16.1 LAF +0.4 143.5 Under 4.0 92% GT W L ›
Final
8-4 · #233
83
6-5 · #186
78
UVM -6.5 152.5 UVM -4.2 IONA +2.3 155.4 Over 2.9 64% UVM W W ›
Final
1-9 · #272
61
2-8 · #331
82
MERC -7.5 132.5 MERC -7.9 MERC +0.4 137.5 Over 5.0 76% MERC W W ›
Final
6-4 · #232
81
10-2 · #68
82
VT -12.5 158.5 VT -13.6 VT +1.1 162.6 Over 4.1 88% VT L W ›
Final
9-0 · #125
86
2-8 · #181
77
M-OH -7.5 147.5 M-OH -7.5 — 147.8 Over 0.3 74% M-OH W ›
Final
7-2 · #151
69
8-3 · #209
59
KENT -1.5 163.5 MASS -1.3 MASS +2.8 167.4 Over 3.9 55% MASS L L ›
Final
3-7 · #317
53
4-6 · #136
81
HARV -10.5 136.5 HARV -9.1 HC +1.4 137.8 Over 1.3 79% HARV L L ›
Final
7-4 · #231
63
5-5 · #147
70
TROY -4.5 155.5 TROY -4.7 TROY +0.2 162.1 Over 6.6 66% TROY W L ›
Final
5-6 · #283
76
3-8 · #234
74
ODU -3.5 147.5 ODU -6.2 ODU +2.7 146.9 Under 0.6 70% ODU L L ›
Final
3-7 · #263
86
6-2 · #219
79
UNCO -8.5 159.5 UNCO -9.9 UNCO +1.4 166.9 Over 7.4 81% UNCO L W ›
Final
2-7 · #270
73
2-7 · #334
74
NIU -2.5 149.5 NIU -0.3 CMU +2.2 150.3 Over 0.8 51% NIU W L ›
Final
1-11 · #221
76
1-9 · #358
62
UL -1.5 136.5 UL -0.9 ULM +0.6 142.9 Over 6.4 53% UL L W ›
Final
10-1 · #44
71
8-2 · #33
70
UNC -2.5 157.5 UNC -0.9 OSU +1.6 158.9 Over 1.4 53% UNC W L ›
Final
8-3 · #228
65
5-6 · #103
67
TXST -3.5 136.5 TXST -0.3 USA +3.2 140.7 Over 4.2 51% TXST W L ›
Final
4-6 · #76
66
6-5 · #53
71
MSST -3.5 153.5 MSST -2.9 MEM +0.6 156.7 Over 3.2 60% MSST L L ›
Final
1-6 · #198
81
6-4 · #173
75
ETSU -9.5 134.5 ETSU -11.1 ETSU +1.6 136.3 Over 1.8 83% ETSU L W ›
Final
6-4 · #80
82
8-2 · #122
70
WYO -2.5 147.5 WYO -1.8 GCU +0.7 147.2 Under 0.3 56% WYO W L ›
Final
7-4 · #59
58
8-3 · #72
61
BTLR -3.5 154.5 NU -0.2 NU +3.7 161.4 Over 6.9 51% NU W L ›
Final
4-5 · #229
83
7-4 · #63
91
SYR -14.5 140.5 SYR -15.1 SYR +0.6 144.5 Over 4.0 91% SYR L W ›
Final
6-3 · #200
68
4-6 · #128
58
BGSU -1.5 153.5 BGSU -0.2 OHIO +1.3 154.6 Over 1.1 51% BGSU L L ›
Final
5-4 · #341
86
3-6 · #282
62
UTM -2.5 145.5 TNTC -2.7 TNTC +5.2 145.9 Over 0.4 59% TNTC L W ›
Final
7-4 · #171
93
5-5 · #224
86
ARST -1.5 155.5 ARST -2.0 ARST +0.5 158.9 Over 3.4 57% ARST W W ›
Final
2-7 · #306
91
4-4 · #245
82
SEMO -1.5 151.5 TNST -2.0 TNST +3.5 154.2 Over 2.7 57% TNST L W ›
Final
2-7 · #350
64
MORE -1.5 145.5 USI -0.5 USI +2.0 146.2 Over 0.7 52% USI L L ›
Final
4-6 · #266
80
9-1 · #39
102
UCF -17.5 161.5 UCF -17.0 FGCU +0.5 165.3 Over 3.8 93% UCF L W ›
Final
3-9 · #113
80
8-3 · #106
78
SCU -15.5 151.5 SCU -14.8 LUC +0.8 152.1 Over 0.6 90% SCU W W ›
Final
5-4 · #242
78
3-8 · #139
84
WSU -7.5 151.5 WSU -6.2 MER +1.3 152.3 Over 0.8 71% WSU W W ›
Final
6-5 · #324
79
3-4 · #178
86
FIU -6.5 161.5 FIU -5.3 LIU +1.2 157.6 Under 3.9 68% FIU L L ›
Final
6-5 · #158
92
7-5 · #296
96
GASO -2.5 153.5 GASO -1.7 JMU +0.8 157.8 Over 4.3 56% GASO L W ›
Final
10-1 · #2
94
9-2 · #18
85
HOU -5.5 146.5 HOU -5.4 ARK +0.1 146.2 Under 0.3 68% HOU L L ›
Final
6-5 · #50
72
9-1 · #20
80
UVA -16.5 153.5 UVA -9.5 MD +7.0 152.3 Under 1.2 80% UVA W W ›
Final
0-9 · #339
56
8-2 · #104
80
RICH -18.5 146.5 RICH -20.4 RICH +1.9 149.2 Over 2.7 96% RICH W L ›
Final
3-9 · #299
39
9-2 · #43
94
IOWA -25.5 133.5 IOWA -26.8 IOWA +1.3 139.5 Over 6.0 99% IOWA W L ›
Final
8-3 · #21
60
10-1 · #23
88
PUR -7.5 152.5 PUR -6.1 AUB +1.4 160.9 Over 8.4 70% PUR L L ›
Final
5-5 · #174
72
4-6 · #98
84
UNLV -8.5 159.5 UNLV -7.0 FRES +1.5 158.4 Under 1.1 73% UNLV L W ›
Final
2-7 · #279
85
3-5 · #293
82
LAM -5.5 141.5 LAM -2.7 OMA +2.8 142.2 Over 0.7 59% LAM W W ›
Final
1-9 · #254
77
7-4 · #73
101
UTAH -10.5 160.5 UTAH -13.3 UTAH +2.8 163.1 Over 2.6 88% UTAH W W ›
Final
3-4 · #274
61
7-4 · #130
63
TULN -2.5 145.5 TULN -3.5 TULN +1.0 148.1 Over 2.6 62% TULN L L ›
Final
4-6 · #281
78
7-4 · #212
92
STMN -14.5 152.5 STMN -9.3 UCR +5.2 150.3 Under 2.3 79% STMN W L ›
Final
1-6 · #196
67
9-3 · #203
74
CBU -14.5 158.5 CBU -13.2 SAC +1.3 147.9 Under 10.6 88% CBU W W ›
Final
9-2 · #85
77
10-1 · #65
68
COLO -2.5 154.5 COLO -3.2 COLO +0.7 160.2 Over 5.7 61% COLO L L ›
Final
5-4 · #137
69
5-6 · #62
70
RUTG -11.5 150.5 RUTG -11.4 PENN +0.1 150.1 Under 0.4 84% RUTG W W ›
Final
8-3 · #12
82
11-0 · #3
81
DUKE -9.5 152.5 DUKE -7.7 TTU +1.8 150.4 Under 2.1 75% DUKE W L ›
Final
8-4 · #49
80
8-3 · #64
77
GTWN -4.5 149.5 GTWN -3.2 XAV +1.3 153.8 Over 4.3 61% GTWN W W ›
Final
5-7 · #42
63
6-5 · #37
84
CREI -6.5 151.5 CREI -8.0 CREI +1.5 150.6 Under 0.9 76% CREI W W ›
Final
4-6 · #143
65
8-2 · #82
88
UNM -16.5 152.5 UNM -12.7 SJSU +3.8 150.0 Under 2.5 87% UNM L L ›
Final
4-6 · #177
62
2-8 · #172
84
RICE -1.5 140.5 RICE -1.2 PEPP +0.3 144.5 Over 4.0 54% RICE W W ›
Final
3-6 · #268
82
4-6 · #313
80
WEB -5.5 152.5 WEB -4.8 UTU +0.7 154.1 Over 1.6 66% WEB W W ›
Final
7-2 · #86
66
8-3 · #96
81
BOIS -3.5 141.5 BOIS -2.8 NEV +0.7 141.9 Over 0.4 60% BOIS W W ›
Final
6-3 · #75
45
10-0 · #5
68
ARIZ -13.5 153.5 ARIZ -16.1 ARIZ +2.6 156.3 Over 2.8 92% ARIZ W L ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record