Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games5151 final · 0 to play
Lines moved341+ pt since the open · 51 with a line
Totals moved461+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS23-2845% covered
Upsets11outright
Over / Under25-2649% over
Model Favorite40-1178% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
WSU @ BRADBRAD -8.5 → BRAD -5.53 → WSU157.5 → 148.5▼ 9
UGA @ FSUUGA -2.5 → FSU -1.54 → FSU171.5 → 176.5▲ 5
PUR @ RUTGPUR -16.5 → PUR -13.53 → RUTG144.5 → 146.5▲ 2
ACU @ PEPPPEPP -1.5 → ACU -1.53 → ACU137.5 → 137.5no move
FDU @ PROVPROV -27.5 → PROV -26.51 → FDU167.5 → 162.5▼ 5
SLU @ LMUSLU -6.5 → SLU -7.51 → SLU145.5 → 150.5▲ 5
GW @ ARMYGW -21.5 → GW -19.52 → ARMY159.5 → 156.5▼ 3
CHSO @ UTMUTM -5.5 → UTM -3.52 → CHSO148.5 → 147.5▼ 1
TENN @ SYRTENN -5.5 → TENN -7.52 → TENN149.5 → 147.5▼ 2
JKST @ KENNKENN -13.5 → KENN -15.52 → KENN159.5 → 157.5▼ 2
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference
6-2 · #101
84
Army
2-6 · #288
70
Spread
GW -19.5
✓ ARMY W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼3
▼ Under 154
Projected
91–72
✓ GW won
Model: ARMY by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 6.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-4 · #326
56
3-2 · #341
73
Spread
UTM -3.5
✓ UTM W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼1
▼ Under 129
Projected
72–78
✓ UTM won
Model: UTM by 2.4 ✓ Model: Over 2.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #243
76
7-1 · #78
87
Spread
PSU -14.5
✓ CAM W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲3
▲ Over 163
Projected
71–84
✓ PSU won
Model: CAM by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 0.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-7 · #349
65
1-6 · #290
77
Spread
BRY -6.5
✓ BRY W ATS
Total
134.5
▲ Over 142
Projected
63–72
✓ BRY won
Model: BRY by 2.7 ✓ Model: Over 1.2 ✓
FinalConference
Iowa
7-0 · #43
52
7-0 · #10 AP #7
71
Spread
MSU -5.5
✓ MSU W ATS
Total
133.5 ▼2
▼ Under 123
Projected
69–75
✓ MSU won
Model: MSU by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 10.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
7-1 · #7 AP #13
60
4-3 · #63
62
Spread
TENN -7.5
✓ SYR W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼2
▼ Under 122
Projected
78–71
✗ TENN lost
Model: SYR by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 1.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-0 · #133
75
6-1 · #228
77
Spread
NMSU -2.5
✓ USA W ATS
Total
135.5 ▲1
▲ Over 152
Projected
71–66
✗ NMSU lost
Model: NMSU by 2.2 ✗ Model: Over 1.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-7 · #284
77
2-4 · #271
82
Spread
UNCA -4.5
✓ UNCA W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼3
▲ Over 159
Projected
74–76
✓ UNCA won
Model: UNCG by 2.3 ✗ Model: Over 6.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-6 · #280
73
3-2 · #148
88
Spread
KENN -15.5
✓ JKST W ATS
Total
157.5 ▼2
▲ Over 161
Projected
76–89
✓ KENN won
Model: JKST by 2.8 ✓ Model: Over 6.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-2 · #179
81
7-0 · #93
99
Spread
GMU -10.5
✓ GMU W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲2
▲ Over 180
Projected
74–85
✓ GMU won
Model: GMU by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 3.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-7 · #208
67
4-2 · #242
78
Spread
MER -10.5
✓ MER W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲2
▼ Under 145
Projected
71–81
✓ MER won
Model: GAST by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 3.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
SIUE
3-3 · #256
72
0-5 · #333
63
Spread
SIUE -7.5
✓ SIUE W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼2
▼ Under 135
Projected
80–76
✓ SIUE won
Model: UNF by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 2.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #327
82
2-4 · #223
85
Spread
JAX -10.5
✓ FAMU W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼3
▲ Over 167
Projected
64–75
✓ JAX won
Model: JAX by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 0.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-3 · #188
68
6-1 · #72
84
Spread
BTLR -17.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲2
▼ Under 152
Projected
67–85
✓ BTLR won
Model: BTLR by 0.4 ✗ Model: Under 1.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-6 · #364
56
1-5 · #145
68
Spread
ECU -12.5
✓ UMES W ATS
Total
127.5 ▼1
▼ Under 124
Projected
62–74
✓ ECU won
Model: UMES by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 9.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #275
57
2-5 · #141
74
Spread
CLT -7.5
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼1
▼ Under 131
Projected
69–78
✓ CLT won
Model: CLT by 1.7 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-6 · #216
71
0-6 · #272
80
Spread
LEH -3.5
✓ BING W ATS
Total
139.5
▲ Over 151
Projected
75–70
✗ LEH lost
Model: LEH by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 5.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-5 · #156
56
6-2 · #105
66
Spread
URI -13.5
✓ BRWN W ATS
Total
138.5 ▲1
▼ Under 122
Projected
64–79
✓ URI won
Model: URI by 1.7 ✗ Model: Over 5.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
5-2 · #217
83
4-2 · #107
79
Spread
DUQ -5.5
✓ W&M W ATS
Total
170.5 ▲4
▼ Under 162
Projected
82–85
✗ DUQ lost
Model: W&M by 2.0 ✓ Model: Under 3.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
ETSU
5-1 · #173
71
6-2 · #91
88
Spread
DAY -11.5
✓ DAY W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼1
▲ Over 159
Projected
68–76
✓ DAY won
Model: ETSU by 3.1 ✗ Model: Over 3.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
FDU
0-6 · #356
64
4-4 · #52
94
Spread
PROV -26.5
✓ PROV W ATS
Total
162.5 ▼5
▼ Under 158
Projected
70–97
✓ PROV won
Model: PROV by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 4.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
6-2 · #68
86
5-2 · #79
83
Spread
SC -2.5
✓ VT W ATS
Total
149.5
▲ Over 169
Projected
75–78
✗ SC lost
Model: Over 3.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-2 · #31
86
6-2 · #89
68
Spread
WAKE -4.5
✓ OU W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲1
▼ Under 154
Projected
78–84
✗ WAKE lost
Model: WAKE by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 2.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
6-2 · #28
81
Pitt
5-3 · #74
73
Spread
TA&M -3.5
✓ TA&M W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲2
▲ Over 154
Projected
78–72
✓ TA&M won
Model: TA&M by 2.3 ✓ Model: Under 3.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
5-2 · #1 AP #15
66
Duke
8-0 · #3 AP #4
67
Spread
DUKE -9.5
✓ FLA W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲2
▼ Under 133
Projected
76–81
✓ DUKE won
Model: FLA by 5.0 ✓ Model: Under 0.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-6 · #365
57
3-3 · #144
108
Spread
DRKE -17.5
✓ DRKE W ATS
Total
138.5 ▲2
▲ Over 165
Projected
59–78
✓ DRKE won
Model: DRKE by 2.3 ✓ Model: Under 1.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #338
63
5-2 · #130
65
Spread
TULN -11.5
✓ GRAM W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲2
▼ Under 128
Projected
69–80
✓ TULN won
Model: TULN by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 0.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-4 · #205
94
4-3 · #324
92
Spread
WIN -5.5
✓ LIU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼1
▲ Over 186
Projected
82–74
✓ WIN won
Model: WIN by 2.3 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓
FinalConference
7-0 · #23 AP #1
81
5-3 · #62
65
Spread
PUR -13.5
✓ PUR W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲2
▼ Under 146
Projected
84–65
✓ PUR won
Model: PUR by 5.6 ✓ Model: Over 3.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #300
75
5-2 · #112
77
Spread
UNT -11.5
✓ HCU W ATS
Total
127.5 ▲1
▲ Over 152
Projected
58–71
✓ UNT won
Model: UNT by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 1.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-5 · #354
63
5-3 · #50
89
Spread
MD -22.5
✓ MD W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲2
▲ Over 152
Projected
65–84
✓ MD won
Model: WAG by 2.9 ✗ Model: Over 5.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-5 · #350
52
5-3 · #132
84
Spread
MUR -16.5
✓ MUR W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲1
▼ Under 136
Projected
72–88
✓ MUR won
Model: MORE by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-5 · #139
60
4-4 · #167
64
Spread
BRAD -5.5
✓ WSU W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼9
▼ Under 124
Projected
75–80
✓ BRAD won
Model: WSU by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 6.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-2 · #257
63
4-3 · #171
83
Spread
ARST -5.5
✓ ARST W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼1
▼ Under 146
Projected
75–80
✓ ARST won
Model: UTA by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 3.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #258
99
2-4 · #334
64
Spread
NIU -3.5
✓ LIN W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 163
Projected
74–77
✗ NIU lost
Model: LIN by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 3.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-2 · #176
72
4-4 · #42
75
Spread
MARQ -17.5
✓ VAL W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼1
▲ Over 147
Projected
66–82
✓ MARQ won
Model: VAL by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 1.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-5 · #196
88
5-1 · #29
110
Spread
BAY -29.5
✓ SAC W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲1
▲ Over 198
Projected
65–91
✓ BAY won
Model: SAC by 2.9 ✓ Model: Under 2.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #270
72
1-7 · #113
83
Spread
LUC -6.5
✓ LUC W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼2
▲ Over 155
Projected
70–74
✓ LUC won
Model: CMU by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 3.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-2 · #189
83
7-0 · #45
93
Spread
OKST -13.5
✓ SHSU W ATS
Total
169.5 ▼1
▲ Over 176
Projected
77–93
✓ OKST won
Model: OKST by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
6-1 · #6 AP #5
61
6-2 · #16 AP #21
56
Spread
CONN -3.5
✓ CONN W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲1
▼ Under 117
Projected
73–71
✓ CONN won
Model: KU by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-6 · #303
45
4-3 · #80
67
Spread
GCU -24.5
✓ STET W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼3
▼ Under 112
Projected
61–84
✓ GCU won
Model: STET by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 3.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #253
71
1-5 · #172
63
Spread
ACU -1.5
✓ ACU W ATS
Total
137.5
▼ Under 134
Projected
68–71
✗ PEPP lost
Model: PEPP by 4.0 ✗ Model: Over 1.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-6 · #285
76
4-3 · #37
96
Spread
CREI -18.5
✓ CREI W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼3
▲ Over 172
Projected
62–83
✓ CREI won
Model: CREI by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
6-2 · #25
75
5-2 · #46
66
Spread
MISS -1.5
✓ MIA W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼3
▼ Under 141
Projected
76–76
✗ MISS lost
Model: MIA by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 6.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
7-1 · #34
107
5-2 · #81
73
Spread
FSU -1.5
✓ UGA W ATS
Total
176.5 ▲5
▲ Over 180
Projected
87–84
✓ UGA won
Model: UGA by 5.1 ✓ Model: Under 5.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
8-0 · #54
71
5-3 · #71
76
Spread
MIZ -1.5
✓ ND W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼2
▲ Over 147
Projected
78–75
✗ MIZ lost
Model: MIZ by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 5.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
6-1 · #44 AP #16
67
5-2 · #19 AP #18
64
Spread
UK -7.5
✓ UNC W ATS
Total
163.5 ▲4
▼ Under 131
Projected
75–84
✗ UK lost
Model: UK by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 3.8 ✓
FinalConference
USC
7-0 · #36 AP #24
82
4-3 · #57
77
Spread
USC -2.5
✓ USC W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼3
▲ Over 159
Projected
83–81
✓ USC won
Model: ORE by 0.7 ✗ Model: Over 8.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
6-0 · #123
70
5-3 · #96
76
Spread
NEV -5.5
✓ NEV W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼1
▼ Under 146
Projected
74–77
✓ NEV won
Model: UCSD by 2.7 ✗ Model: Over 1.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
Utah
6-2 · #73
72
6-1 · #92
79
Spread
CAL -7.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼1
▼ Under 151
Projected
76–84
✓ CAL won
Model: CAL by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 7.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
6-1 · #69
91
LMU
6-2 · #121
70
Spread
SLU -7.5
✓ SLU W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲5
▲ Over 161
Projected
77–70
✓ SLU won
Model: LMU by 0.2 ✗ Model: Under 3.0 ✗
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
6-2 · #101
84
2-6 · #288
70
GW -19.5 156.5 GW -18.9 ARMY +0.6 162.7 Over 6.2 95% GW W L ›
Final
3-4 · #326
56
3-2 · #341
73
UTM -3.5 147.5 UTM -5.9 UTM +2.4 150.4 Over 2.9 70% UTM W L ›
Final
2-4 · #243
76
7-1 · #78
87
PSU -14.5 154.5 PSU -13.4 CAM +1.1 154.9 Over 0.4 88% PSU W W ›
Final
1-7 · #349
65
1-6 · #290
77
BRY -6.5 134.5 BRY -9.2 BRY +2.7 135.7 Over 1.2 79% BRY W W ›
Final
7-0 · #43
52
7-0 · #10
71
MSU -5.5 133.5 MSU -5.8 MSU +0.3 144.1 Over 10.6 69% MSU W L ›
Final
7-1 · #7
60
4-3 · #63
62
TENN -7.5 147.5 TENN -6.7 SYR +0.8 149.2 Over 1.7 72% TENN W L ›
Final
4-0 · #133
75
6-1 · #228
77
NMSU -2.5 135.5 NMSU -4.7 NMSU +2.2 137.1 Over 1.6 66% NMSU L W ›
Final
1-7 · #284
77
2-4 · #271
82
UNCA -4.5 143.5 UNCA -2.2 UNCG +2.3 150.3 Over 6.8 58% UNCA L W ›
Final
1-6 · #280
73
3-2 · #148
88
KENN -15.5 157.5 KENN -12.7 JKST +2.8 164.4 Over 6.9 87% KENN W W ›
Final
4-2 · #179
81
7-0 · #93
99
GMU -10.5 155.5 GMU -10.9 GMU +0.4 159.3 Over 3.8 83% GMU W W ›
Final
0-7 · #208
67
4-2 · #242
78
MER -10.5 155.5 MER -10.0 GAST +0.5 152.0 Under 3.5 81% MER L W ›
Final
3-3 · #256
72
0-5 · #333
63
SIUE -7.5 153.5 SIUE -4.0 UNF +3.5 155.9 Over 2.4 64% SIUE L L ›
Final
0-4 · #327
82
2-4 · #223
85
JAX -10.5 138.5 JAX -10.9 JAX +0.4 138.9 Over 0.4 83% JAX L W ›
Final
5-3 · #188
68
6-1 · #72
84
BTLR -17.5 153.5 BTLR -17.9 BTLR +0.4 151.9 Under 1.6 94% BTLR L W ›
Final
2-6 · #364
56
1-5 · #145
68
ECU -12.5 127.5 ECU -12.1 UMES +0.4 136.7 Over 9.2 85% ECU W L ›
Final
2-2 · #275
57
2-5 · #141
74
CLT -7.5 144.5 CLT -9.2 CLT +1.7 147.0 Over 2.5 79% CLT W L ›
Final
2-6 · #216
71
0-6 · #272
80
LEH -3.5 139.5 LEH -4.4 LEH +0.9 144.8 Over 5.3 65% LEH L W ›
Final
3-5 · #156
56
6-2 · #105
66
URI -13.5 138.5 URI -15.2 URI +1.7 143.6 Over 5.1 91% URI L L ›
Final
5-2 · #217
83
4-2 · #107
79
DUQ -5.5 170.5 DUQ -3.5 W&M +2.0 166.9 Under 3.6 62% DUQ W W ›
Final
5-1 · #173
71
6-2 · #91
88
DAY -11.5 140.5 DAY -8.4 ETSU +3.1 144.4 Over 3.9 77% DAY L W ›
Final
0-6 · #356
64
4-4 · #52
94
PROV -26.5 162.5 PROV -26.9 PROV +0.4 167.3 Over 4.8 99% PROV W L ›
Final
6-2 · #68
86
5-2 · #79
83
SC -2.5 149.5 SC -2.5 — 152.8 Over 3.3 59% SC W ›
Final
5-2 · #31
86
6-2 · #89
68
WAKE -4.5 159.5 WAKE -5.3 WAKE +0.8 161.6 Over 2.1 68% WAKE L L ›
Final
6-2 · #28
81
5-3 · #74
73
TA&M -3.5 152.5 TA&M -5.8 TA&M +2.3 149.3 Under 3.2 69% TA&M W L ›
Final
5-2 · #1
66
8-0 · #3
67
DUKE -9.5 157.5 DUKE -4.5 FLA +5.0 157.1 Under 0.4 65% DUKE W W ›
Final
0-6 · #365
57
3-3 · #144
108
DRKE -17.5 138.5 DRKE -19.8 DRKE +2.3 136.8 Under 1.7 96% DRKE W L ›
Final
2-4 · #338
63
5-2 · #130
65
TULN -11.5 148.5 TULN -11.6 TULN +0.1 148.7 Over 0.2 84% TULN L L ›
Final
4-4 · #205
94
4-3 · #324
92
WIN -5.5 153.5 WIN -7.8 WIN +2.3 156.0 Over 2.5 75% WIN L W ›
Final
7-0 · #23
81
5-3 · #62
65
PUR -13.5 146.5 PUR -19.1 PUR +5.6 149.5 Over 3.0 95% PUR W L ›
Final
2-3 · #300
75
5-2 · #112
77
UNT -11.5 127.5 UNT -12.4 UNT +0.9 128.9 Over 1.4 86% UNT L W ›
Final
1-5 · #354
63
5-3 · #50
89
MD -22.5 143.5 MD -19.6 WAG +2.9 148.6 Over 5.1 96% MD L W ›
Final
1-5 · #350
52
5-3 · #132
84
MUR -16.5 158.5 MUR -15.9 MORE +0.6 159.0 Over 0.5 92% MUR L L ›
Final
2-5 · #139
60
4-4 · #167
64
BRAD -5.5 148.5 BRAD -4.8 WSU +0.8 154.9 Over 6.4 66% BRAD W L ›
Final
4-2 · #257
63
4-3 · #171
83
ARST -5.5 151.5 ARST -5.1 UTA +0.4 154.8 Over 3.3 67% ARST L L ›
Final
2-4 · #258
99
2-4 · #334
64
NIU -3.5 147.5 NIU -3.2 LIN +0.3 150.5 Over 3.0 61% NIU W W ›
Final
5-2 · #176
72
4-4 · #42
75
MARQ -17.5 146.5 MARQ -16.4 VAL +1.1 148.4 Over 1.9 92% MARQ W W ›
Final
1-5 · #196
88
5-1 · #29
110
BAY -29.5 158.5 BAY -26.6 SAC +2.9 156.2 Under 2.3 99% BAY W L ›
Final
2-4 · #270
72
1-7 · #113
83
LUC -6.5 140.5 LUC -4.1 CMU +2.4 144.3 Over 3.8 64% LUC L W ›
Final
3-2 · #189
83
7-0 · #45
93
OKST -13.5 169.5 OKST -16.0 OKST +2.5 169.9 Over 0.4 92% OKST L W ›
Final
6-1 · #6
61
6-2 · #16
56
CONN -3.5 141.5 CONN -2.7 KU +0.8 144.0 Over 2.5 59% CONN L L ›
Final
2-6 · #303
45
4-3 · #80
67
GCU -24.5 141.5 GCU -22.7 STET +1.8 145.4 Over 3.9 98% GCU W L ›
Final
2-3 · #253
71
1-5 · #172
63
ACU -1.5 137.5 PEPP -2.5 PEPP +4.0 138.9 Over 1.4 58% PEPP L L ›
Final
0-6 · #285
76
4-3 · #37
96
CREI -18.5 143.5 CREI -21.0 CREI +2.5 145.4 Over 1.9 97% CREI W W ›
Final
6-2 · #25
75
5-2 · #46
66
MISS -1.5 145.5 MISS -0.4 MIA +1.1 151.9 Over 6.4 51% MISS W L ›
Final
7-1 · #34
107
5-2 · #81
73
FSU -1.5 176.5 UGA -3.6 UGA +5.1 170.8 Under 5.7 62% UGA W L ›
Final
8-0 · #54
71
5-3 · #71
76
MIZ -1.5 146.5 MIZ -2.7 MIZ +1.2 152.4 Over 5.9 59% MIZ L W ›
Final
6-1 · #44
67
5-2 · #19
64
UK -7.5 163.5 UK -9.0 UK +1.5 159.7 Under 3.8 78% UK L W ›
Final
7-0 · #36
82
4-3 · #57
77
USC -2.5 154.5 USC -1.8 ORE +0.7 163.2 Over 8.7 56% USC L W ›
Final
6-0 · #123
70
5-3 · #96
76
NEV -5.5 149.5 NEV -2.8 UCSD +2.7 151.3 Over 1.8 60% NEV L L ›
Final
6-2 · #73
72
6-1 · #92
79
CAL -7.5 152.5 CAL -7.7 CAL +0.2 159.5 Over 7.0 75% CAL L L ›
Final
6-1 · #69
91
6-2 · #121
70
SLU -7.5 150.5 SLU -7.3 LMU +0.2 147.5 Under 3.0 74% SLU L L ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record