Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games6666 final · 0 to play
Lines moved561+ pt since the open · 66 with a line
Totals moved581+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS29-3744% covered
Upsets13outright
Over / Under26-4039% over
Model Favorite54-1282% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
FSU @ FLAFLA -17.5 → FLA -17.5no move170.5 → 180.5▲ 10
WAKE vs MICHMICH -12.5 → MICH -15.53 → MICH159.5 → 168.5▲ 9
LIU @ AFLIU -1.5 → LIU -5.54 → LIU138.5 → 137.5▼ 1
RAD @ UNCUNC -21.5 → UNC -20.51 → RAD154.5 → 162.5▲ 8
CCSU @ BCBC -21.5 → BC -17.54 → CCSU144.5 → 136.5▼ 8
LMU @ UTEPLMU -2.5 → UTEP -1.54 → UTEP147.5 → 144.5▼ 3
CREI @ GONZGONZ -8.5 → GONZ -12.54 → GONZ161.5 → 164.5▲ 3
W&M @ RICHRICH -8.5 → RICH -9.51 → RICH157.5 → 164.5▲ 7
DREX @ COLGCOLG -4.5 → COLG -3.51 → DREX137.5 → 143.5▲ 6
WAG @ FORFOR -9.5 → FOR -12.53 → FOR136.5 → 139.5▲ 3
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference
Iona
1-0 · #233
105
0-1 · #335
91
Spread
IONA -4.5
✓ IONA W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼2
▲ Over 196
Projected
76–75
✓ IONA won
Model: KC by 3.0 ✗ Model: Under 6.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #324
76
0-2 · #220
72
Spread
LIU -5.5
✓ AF W ATS
Total
137.5 ▼1
▲ Over 148
Projected
70–71
✗ AF lost
Model: AF by 5.7 ✓ Model: Over 3.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
UMBC
0-1 · #264
81
0-1 · #345
79
Spread
UMBC -4.5
✓ MORG W ATS
Total
162.5 ▼5
▼ Under 160
Projected
83–80
✓ UMBC won
Model: MORG by 1.4 ✓ Model: Over 0.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-0 · #89
84
1-0 · #8 AP #6
85
Spread
MICH -15.5
✓ WAKE W ATS
Total
168.5 ▲9
▲ Over 169
Projected
73–89
✓ MICH won
Model: MICH by 0.9 ✗ Model: Under 7.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #259
53
2-0 · #33
75
Spread
OSU -23.5
✓ APP W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼1
▼ Under 128
Projected
66–88
✓ OSU won
Model: APP by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 7.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #214
64
0-2 · #271
69
Spread
UNCA -6.5
✓ LIP W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲3
▼ Under 133
Projected
77–81
✓ UNCA won
Model: LIP by 2.6 ✓ Model: Under 1.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Navy
1-1 · #199
71
2-0 · #78
80
Spread
PSU -11.5
✓ NAVY W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲1
▼ Under 151
Projected
68–82
✓ PSU won
Model: PSU by 2.9 ✗ Model: Under 6.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Duke
2-0 · #3 AP #4
114
Army
0-1 · #288
59
Spread
DUKE -33.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲3
▲ Over 173
Projected
91–58
✓ DUKE won
Model: ARMY by 1.0 ✗ Model: Under 3.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-0 · #81
76
1-1 · #1 AP #10
78
Spread
FLA -17.5
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
180.5 ▲10
▼ Under 154
Projected
74–94
✓ FLA won
Model: FLA by 2.2 ✗ Model: Under 12.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-0 · #246
74
2-0 · #44 AP #18
89
Spread
UNC -20.5
✓ RAD W ATS
Total
162.5 ▲8
▲ Over 163
Projected
66–89
✓ UNC won
Model: UNC by 2.7 ✗ Model: Under 7.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #319
57
0-1 · #234
60
Spread
ODU -8.5
✓ NORF W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲1
▼ Under 117
Projected
73–78
✓ ODU won
Model: NORF by 4.2 ✓ Model: Over 1.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #262
83
0-2 · #211
90
Spread
COLG -3.5
✓ COLG W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲6
▲ Over 173
Projected
69–72
✓ COLG won
Model: Under 2.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #360
64
1-1 · #50
84
Spread
MD -29.5
✓ ALCN W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼5
▲ Over 148
Projected
59–87
✓ MD won
Model: ALCN by 1.8 ✓ Model: Under 0.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #205
66
0-1 · #283
72
Spread
WIN -2.5
✓ CCU W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲2
▼ Under 138
Projected
81–76
✗ WIN lost
Model: WIN by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 8.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #327
60
UCF
1-1 · #39
97
Spread
UCF -23.5
✓ UCF W ATS
Total
169.5 ▲1
▼ Under 157
Projected
69–94
✓ UCF won
Model: UCF by 1.8 ✓ Model: Under 6.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #311
60
1-1 · #32
94
Spread
VILL -19.5
✓ VILL W ATS
Total
160.5 ▲1
▼ Under 154
Projected
67–89
✓ VILL won
Model: VILL by 2.9 ✓ Model: Under 4.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #318
83
0-1 · #292
87
Spread
UNA -6.5
✓ NWST W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼3
▲ Over 170
Projected
69–78
✓ UNA won
Model: UNA by 2.2 ✗ Model: Over 4.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #157
81
0-1 · #180
71
Spread
WRST -5.5
✓ TOL W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲1
▼ Under 152
Projected
76–82
✗ WRST lost
Model: WRST by 0.9 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #223
64
1-0 · #90
85
Spread
HPU -17.5
✓ HPU W ATS
Total
156.5
▼ Under 149
Projected
69–85
✓ HPU won
Model: JAX by 1.6 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #296
95
FGCU
0-1 · #266
94
Spread
FGCU -3.5
✓ GASO W ATS
Total
163.5 ▲3
▲ Over 189
Projected
78–82
✗ FGCU lost
Model: FGCU by 0.8 ✗ Model: Under 3.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-0 · #124
63
1-0 · #111
90
Spread
TEM -6.5
✓ TEM W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼2
▲ Over 153
Projected
74–78
✓ TEM won
Model: LAS by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 4.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #354
61
0-1 · #100
63
Spread
FOR -12.5
✓ WAG W ATS
Total
139.5 ▲3
▼ Under 124
Projected
65–79
✓ FOR won
Model: FOR by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 4.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #362
66
2-0 · #72
98
Spread
BTLR -26.5
✓ BTLR W ATS
Total
158.5 ▼4
▲ Over 164
Projected
67–96
✓ BTLR won
Model: BTLR by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 4.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-0 · #115
62
2-0 · #141
55
Spread
CLT -1.5
✓ DAV W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼1
▼ Under 117
Projected
73–73
✓ DAV won
Model: DAV by 1.9 ✓ Model: Over 2.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
NJIT
1-1 · #316
66
0-1 · #314
64
Spread
L-MD -10.5
✓ NJIT W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼6
▼ Under 130
Projected
65–72
✗ L-MD lost
Model: NJIT by 3.7 ✓ Model: Under 3.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-0 · #217
86
1-0 · #104
90
Spread
RICH -9.5
✓ W&M W ATS
Total
164.5 ▲7
▲ Over 176
Projected
72–82
✓ RICH won
Model: RICH by 0.4 ✗ Model: Under 10.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #349
57
1-1 · #105
80
Spread
URI -16.5
✓ URI W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲2
▼ Under 137
Projected
65–80
✓ URI won
Model: STO by 1.8 ✗ Model: Under 6.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-0 · #91
62
2-0 · #30
74
Spread
CIN -5.5
✓ CIN W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲1
▼ Under 136
Projected
68–76
✓ CIN won
Model: CIN by 3.0 ✓ Model: Under 3.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #350
56
2-0 · #35
83
Spread
CLEM -29.5
✓ MORE W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲6
▼ Under 139
Projected
61–89
✓ CLEM won
Model: MORE by 1.4 ✓ Model: Under 1.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #337
60
1-1 · #95
59
Spread
BC -17.5
✓ CCSU W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼8
▼ Under 119
Projected
61–79
✗ BC lost
Model: BC by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 4.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #229
77
1-0 · #136
60
Spread
HARV -5.5
✓ NE W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼1
▼ Under 137
Projected
72–76
✗ HARV lost
Model: NE by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 3.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
Penn
0-1 · #137
81
1-1 · #52
106
Spread
PROV -19.5
✓ PROV W ATS
Total
172.5 ▲2
▲ Over 187
Projected
72–91
✓ PROV won
Model: PENN by 1.1 ✗ Model: Under 9.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #278
74
66
Spread
MSM -6.5
✓ MSM W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲1
▼ Under 140
Projected
76–70
✓ MSM won
Model: SFPA by 0.4 ✗ Model: Under 2.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-0 · #299
63
0-1 · #135
73
Spread
PRIN -4.5
✓ PRIN W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲2
▼ Under 136
Projected
73–75
✓ PRIN won
Model: BUCK by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 2.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #302
77
UAB
1-1 · #102
74
Spread
UAB -19.5
✓ ALST W ATS
Total
164.5 ▲1
▼ Under 151
Projected
71–89
✗ UAB lost
Model: ALST by 1.6 ✓ Model: Under 4.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Yale
1-0 · #126
97
1-1 · #241
60
Spread
YALE -6.5
✓ YALE W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲1
▲ Over 157
Projected
82–74
✓ YALE won
Model: YALE by 0.7 ✓ Model: Under 0.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #361
58
2-0 · #71
78
Spread
ND -23.5
✓ EIU W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼1
▼ Under 136
Projected
60–83
✓ ND won
Model: EIU by 1.3 ✓ Model: Under 0.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-0 · #19 AP #9
88
2-0 · #14 AP #12
96
Spread
LOU -5.5
✓ LOU W ATS
Total
173.5 ▲4
▲ Over 184
Projected
80–83
✓ LOU won
Model: UK by 2.7 ✗ Model: Under 10.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #240
56
1-1 · #18 AP #21
93
Spread
ARK -35.5
✓ ARK W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲1
▼ Under 149
Projected
60–96
✓ ARK won
Model: ARK by 0.8 ✓ Model: Under 3.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #248
62
2-0 · #21 AP #22
93
Spread
AUB -27.5
✓ AUB W ATS
Total
152.5
▲ Over 155
Projected
65–91
✓ AUB won
Model: WOF by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 3.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #238
46
1-1 · #16 AP #25
77
Spread
KU -25.5
✓ KU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼2
▼ Under 123
Projected
62–86
✓ KU won
Model: AMCC by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #225
62
1-2 · #185
76
Spread
TAR -4.5
✓ TAR W ATS
Total
142.5
▼ Under 138
Projected
69–74
✓ TAR won
Model: TAR by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-0 · #130
66
1-1 · #221
62
Spread
TULN -5.5
✓ UL W ATS
Total
135.5 ▼2
▼ Under 128
Projected
75–67
✓ TULN won
Model: TULN by 2.1 ✗ Model: Over 7.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-0 · #193
81
Rice
0-1 · #177
69
Spread
RICE -2.5
✓ SFA W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼1
▲ Over 150
Projected
69–76
✗ RICE lost
Model: RICE by 4.2 ✗ Model: Under 5.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #363
69
1-1 · #31
95
Spread
OU -36.5
✓ UAPB W ATS
Total
168.5
▼ Under 164
Projected
65–97
✓ OU won
Model: UAPB by 4.3 ✓ Model: Under 6.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-0 · #237
66
2-0 · #66
53
Spread
DEP -18.5
✓ BUF W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼1
▼ Under 119
Projected
67–87
✗ DEP lost
Model: DEP by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 0.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #171
86
0-0 · #250
85
Spread
MOST -1.5
✓ ARST W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲1
▲ Over 171
Projected
77–75
✓ ARST won
Model: ARST by 3.2 ✓ Model: Under 1.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #194
68
0-2 · #213
90
Spread
NDSU -4.5
✓ NDSU W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲6
▲ Over 158
Projected
77–80
✓ NDSU won
Model: CSUN by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #364
50
2-0 · #27
69
Spread
NEB -35.5
✓ UMES W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼2
▼ Under 119
Projected
55–88
✓ NEB won
Model: UMES by 2.8 ✓ Model: Under 3.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-0 · #132
91
SMU
2-0 · #55
102
Spread
SMU -10.5
✓ SMU W ATS
Total
164.5 ▲1
▲ Over 193
Projected
72–85
✓ SMU won
Model: SMU by 1.9 ✓ Model: Under 8.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
81
2-0 · #107
87
Spread
DUQ -12.5
✓ QUC W ATS
Total
162.5 ▲3
▲ Over 168
Projected
72–86
✓ DUQ won
Model: DUQ by 1.2 ✗ Model: Under 4.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-0 · #12 AP #11
77
2-0 · #4 AP #14
81
Spread
ILL -3.5
✓ ILL W ATS
Total
168.5 ▲6
▼ Under 158
Projected
82–86
✓ ILL won
Model: ILL by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-0 · #181
55
2-0 · #41 AP #24
86
Spread
WIS -26.5
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲3
▼ Under 141
Projected
64–90
✓ WIS won
Model: BALL by 0.6 ✗ Model: Under 2.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-0 · #210
65
1-0 · #122
79
Spread
WYO -5.5
✓ WYO W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼1
▼ Under 144
Projected
72–76
✓ WYO won
Model: APSU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 6.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #321
49
2-0 · #5 AP #5
84
Spread
ARIZ -35.5
✓ NAU W ATS
Total
163.5
▼ Under 133
Projected
63–96
✓ ARIZ won
Model: NAU by 3.1 ✓ Model: Under 4.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #206
68
BYU
2-0 · #24 AP #7
85
Spread
BYU -35.5
✓ DEL W ATS
Total
164.5 ▲1
▼ Under 153
Projected
63–94
✓ BYU won
Model: DEL by 4.3 ✓ Model: Under 7.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-0 · #76
77
2-0 · #46
83
Spread
MISS -9.5
✓ MEM W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼4
▲ Over 160
Projected
73–81
✓ MISS won
Model: MEM by 2.1 ✓ Model: Over 1.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-0 · #281
68
2-0 · #82
82
Spread
UNM -19.5
✓ UCR W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼5
▲ Over 150
Projected
67–82
✓ UNM won
Model: UCR by 4.8 ✓ Model: Over 6.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
LMU
2-0 · #121
71
UTEP
0-0 · #190
58
Spread
UTEP -1.5
✓ LMU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼3
▼ Under 129
Projected
73–75
✗ UTEP lost
Model: UTEP by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 3.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #287
65
1-0 · #86
85
Spread
BOIS -16.5
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
161.5
▼ Under 150
Projected
70–88
✓ BOIS won
Model: BOIS by 1.0 ✓ Model: Under 3.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #159
53
2-0 · #20
91
Spread
UVA -24.5
✓ UVA W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲1
▼ Under 144
Projected
64–81
✓ UVA won
Model: HAMP by 7.5 ✗ Model: Under 3.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #365
58
0-1 · #329
74
Spread
CSUB -7.5
✓ CSUB W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼2
▼ Under 132
Projected
68–75
✓ CSUB won
Model: WIU by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 1.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-0 · #37 AP #23
63
2-0 · #17 AP #19
90
Spread
GONZ -12.5
✓ GONZ W ATS
Total
164.5 ▲3
▼ Under 153
Projected
76–84
✓ GONZ won
Model: CREI by 4.6 ✗ Model: Under 5.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Ohio
1-1 · #128
60
2-0 · #97
90
Spread
SMC -17.5
✓ SMC W ATS
Total
144.5
▲ Over 150
Projected
67–81
✓ SMC won
Model: OHIO by 3.4 ✗ Model: Over 3.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-0 · #134
92
0-0 · #196
87
Spread
UCSB -7.5
✓ SAC W ATS
Total
161.5
▲ Over 179
Projected
75–71
✓ UCSB won
Model: SAC by 3.0 ✓ Model: Under 15.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #273
102
UNLV
1-1 · #98
93
Spread
UNLV -10.5
✓ MONT W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲1
▲ Over 195
Projected
71–85
✗ UNLV lost
Model: UNLV by 2.8 ✗ Model: Under 1.3 ✗
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
1-0 · #233
105
0-1 · #335
91
IONA -4.5 156.5 IONA -1.5 KC +3.0 150.4 Under 6.1 55% IONA L L ›
Final
1-1 · #324
76
0-2 · #220
72
LIU -5.5 137.5 AF -0.2 AF +5.7 140.8 Over 3.3 51% AF W W ›
Final
0-1 · #264
81
0-1 · #345
79
UMBC -4.5 162.5 UMBC -3.1 MORG +1.4 163.2 Over 0.7 61% UMBC W L ›
Final
2-0 · #89
84
1-0 · #8
85
MICH -15.5 168.5 MICH -16.4 MICH +0.9 161.5 Under 7.0 92% MICH L L ›
Final
1-1 · #259
53
2-0 · #33
75
OSU -23.5 147.5 OSU -21.9 APP +1.6 154.5 Over 7.0 97% OSU W L ›
Final
0-2 · #214
64
0-2 · #271
69
UNCA -6.5 158.5 UNCA -3.9 LIP +2.6 157.5 Under 1.0 63% UNCA W W ›
Final
1-1 · #199
71
2-0 · #78
80
PSU -11.5 155.5 PSU -14.4 PSU +2.9 149.4 Under 6.1 90% PSU L W ›
Final
2-0 · #3
114
0-1 · #288
59
DUKE -33.5 152.5 DUKE -32.5 ARMY +1.0 148.6 Under 3.9 100% DUKE L L ›
Final
2-0 · #81
76
1-1 · #1
78
FLA -17.5 180.5 FLA -19.7 FLA +2.2 167.7 Under 12.8 96% FLA L W ›
Final
1-0 · #246
74
2-0 · #44
89
UNC -20.5 162.5 UNC -23.2 UNC +2.7 154.8 Under 7.7 98% UNC L L ›
Final
0-1 · #319
57
0-1 · #234
60
ODU -8.5 149.5 ODU -4.3 NORF +4.2 151.1 Over 1.6 65% ODU W L ›
Final
0-1 · #262
83
0-2 · #211
90
COLG -3.5 143.5 COLG -3.5 — 141.2 Under 2.3 62% COLG L ›
Final
0-3 · #360
64
1-1 · #50
84
MD -29.5 146.5 MD -27.7 ALCN +1.8 146.4 Under 0.1 99% MD W L ›
Final
1-1 · #205
66
0-1 · #283
72
WIN -2.5 165.5 WIN -5.0 WIN +2.5 157.4 Under 8.1 67% WIN L W ›
Final
0-2 · #327
60
1-1 · #39
97
UCF -23.5 169.5 UCF -25.3 UCF +1.8 163.5 Under 6.0 99% UCF W W ›
Final
0-1 · #311
60
1-1 · #32
94
VILL -19.5 160.5 VILL -22.4 VILL +2.9 156.2 Under 4.3 97% VILL W W ›
Final
0-2 · #318
83
0-1 · #292
87
UNA -6.5 142.5 UNA -8.7 UNA +2.2 146.5 Over 4.0 78% UNA L W ›
Final
0-2 · #157
81
0-1 · #180
71
WRST -5.5 159.5 WRST -6.4 WRST +0.9 158.0 Under 1.5 71% WRST L W ›
Final
0-1 · #223
64
1-0 · #90
85
HPU -17.5 156.5 HPU -15.9 JAX +1.6 154.0 Under 2.5 92% HPU L W ›
Final
1-1 · #296
95
0-1 · #266
94
FGCU -3.5 163.5 FGCU -4.3 FGCU +0.8 160.4 Under 3.1 65% FGCU L L ›
Final
2-0 · #124
63
1-0 · #111
90
TEM -6.5 148.5 TEM -4.1 LAS +2.4 152.7 Over 4.2 64% TEM L W ›
Final
0-2 · #354
61
0-1 · #100
63
FOR -12.5 139.5 FOR -14.0 FOR +1.5 144.3 Over 4.8 89% FOR L L ›
Final
0-2 · #362
66
2-0 · #72
98
BTLR -26.5 158.5 BTLR -28.3 BTLR +1.8 162.8 Over 4.3 99% BTLR W W ›
Final
1-0 · #115
62
2-0 · #141
55
CLT -1.5 143.5 DAV -0.4 DAV +1.9 145.6 Over 2.1 51% DAV W L ›
Final
1-1 · #316
66
0-1 · #314
64
L-MD -10.5 139.5 L-MD -6.8 NJIT +3.7 136.3 Under 3.2 72% L-MD W W ›
Final
1-0 · #217
86
1-0 · #104
90
RICH -9.5 164.5 RICH -9.9 RICH +0.4 154.3 Under 10.2 81% RICH L L ›
Final
0-1 · #349
57
1-1 · #105
80
URI -16.5 151.5 URI -14.7 STO +1.8 145.2 Under 6.3 90% URI L W ›
Final
2-0 · #91
62
2-0 · #30
74
CIN -5.5 147.5 CIN -8.5 CIN +3.0 143.7 Under 3.8 77% CIN W W ›
Final
0-2 · #350
56
2-0 · #35
83
CLEM -29.5 151.5 CLEM -28.1 MORE +1.4 149.6 Under 1.9 99% CLEM W W ›
Final
0-1 · #337
60
1-1 · #95
59
BC -17.5 136.5 BC -18.3 BC +0.8 140.5 Over 4.0 95% BC L L ›
Final
1-1 · #229
77
1-0 · #136
60
HARV -5.5 144.5 HARV -4.3 NE +1.3 147.9 Over 3.4 64% HARV W L ›
Final
0-1 · #137
81
1-1 · #52
106
PROV -19.5 172.5 PROV -18.4 PENN +1.1 162.7 Under 9.8 95% PROV L L ›
Final
0-2 · #278
74
MSM -6.5 149.5 MSM -6.1 SFPA +0.4 146.6 Under 2.9 70% MSM L W ›
Final
2-0 · #299
63
0-1 · #135
73
PRIN -4.5 146.5 PRIN -2.1 BUCK +2.4 148.6 Over 2.1 57% PRIN L L ›
Final
0-1 · #302
77
1-1 · #102
74
UAB -19.5 164.5 UAB -17.9 ALST +1.6 160.4 Under 4.1 94% UAB W W ›
Final
1-0 · #126
97
1-1 · #241
60
YALE -6.5 156.5 YALE -7.2 YALE +0.7 155.9 Under 0.6 73% YALE W L ›
Final
1-1 · #361
58
2-0 · #71
78
ND -23.5 143.5 ND -22.2 EIU +1.3 142.7 Under 0.8 97% ND W W ›
Final
2-0 · #19
88
2-0 · #14
96
LOU -5.5 173.5 LOU -2.8 UK +2.7 163.1 Under 10.4 60% LOU L L ›
Final
0-1 · #240
56
1-1 · #18
93
ARK -35.5 158.5 ARK -36.3 ARK +0.8 155.3 Under 3.2 100% ARK W W ›
Final
1-1 · #248
62
2-0 · #21
93
AUB -27.5 152.5 AUB -26.4 WOF +1.1 155.8 Over 3.3 99% AUB L W ›
Final
0-2 · #238
46
1-1 · #16
77
KU -25.5 145.5 KU -24.0 AMCC +1.5 147.3 Over 1.8 98% KU L L ›
Final
0-2 · #225
62
1-2 · #185
76
TAR -4.5 142.5 TAR -4.8 TAR +0.3 143.0 Over 0.5 66% TAR W L ›
Final
2-0 · #130
66
1-1 · #221
62
TULN -5.5 135.5 TULN -7.6 TULN +2.1 142.5 Over 7.0 75% TULN L L ›
Final
1-0 · #193
81
0-1 · #177
69
RICE -2.5 149.5 RICE -6.7 RICE +4.2 144.4 Under 5.1 72% RICE L L ›
Final
0-3 · #363
69
1-1 · #31
95
OU -36.5 168.5 OU -32.2 UAPB +4.3 162.5 Under 6.0 100% OU W W ›
Final
2-0 · #237
66
2-0 · #66
53
DEP -18.5 153.5 DEP -20.3 DEP +1.8 154.2 Over 0.7 96% DEP L L ›
Final
1-1 · #171
86
0-0 · #250
85
MOST -1.5 152.5 ARST -1.7 ARST +3.2 151.5 Under 1.0 56% ARST W L ›
Final
1-1 · #194
68
0-2 · #213
90
NDSU -4.5 156.5 NDSU -3.5 CSUN +1.0 156.8 Over 0.3 62% NDSU L W ›
Final
0-2 · #364
50
2-0 · #27
69
NEB -35.5 146.5 NEB -32.7 UMES +2.8 143.5 Under 3.0 100% NEB W W ›
Final
2-0 · #132
91
2-0 · #55
102
SMU -10.5 164.5 SMU -12.4 SMU +1.9 156.5 Under 8.0 86% SMU W L ›
Final
2-0 · #107
87
DUQ -12.5 162.5 DUQ -13.7 DUQ +1.2 157.9 Under 4.6 88% DUQ L L ›
Final
2-0 · #12
77
2-0 · #4
81
ILL -3.5 168.5 ILL -4.0 ILL +0.5 167.8 Under 0.7 64% ILL W W ›
Final
1-0 · #181
55
2-0 · #41
86
WIS -26.5 156.5 WIS -25.9 BALL +0.6 154.3 Under 2.2 99% WIS L W ›
Final
1-0 · #210
65
1-0 · #122
79
WYO -5.5 153.5 WYO -4.0 APSU +1.5 147.5 Under 6.0 64% WYO L W ›
Final
0-1 · #321
49
2-0 · #5
84
ARIZ -35.5 163.5 ARIZ -32.4 NAU +3.1 158.8 Under 4.7 100% ARIZ W W ›
Final
0-1 · #206
68
2-0 · #24
85
BYU -35.5 164.5 BYU -31.2 DEL +4.3 157.1 Under 7.4 100% BYU W W ›
Final
1-0 · #76
77
2-0 · #46
83
MISS -9.5 152.5 MISS -7.4 MEM +2.1 154.3 Over 1.8 74% MISS W W ›
Final
1-0 · #281
68
2-0 · #82
82
UNM -19.5 141.5 UNM -14.7 UCR +4.8 148.3 Over 6.8 90% UNM W W ›
Final
2-0 · #121
71
0-0 · #190
58
UTEP -1.5 144.5 UTEP -1.9 UTEP +0.4 147.5 Over 3.0 56% UTEP L L ›
Final
1-1 · #287
65
1-0 · #86
85
BOIS -16.5 161.5 BOIS -17.5 BOIS +1.0 158.1 Under 3.4 94% BOIS W W ›
Final
0-1 · #159
53
2-0 · #20
91
UVA -24.5 148.5 UVA -17.0 HAMP +7.5 145.4 Under 3.1 93% UVA L W ›
Final
0-2 · #365
58
0-1 · #329
74
CSUB -7.5 141.5 CSUB -7.1 WIU +0.4 143.3 Over 1.8 73% CSUB L L ›
Final
1-0 · #37
63
2-0 · #17
90
GONZ -12.5 164.5 GONZ -7.9 CREI +4.6 159.4 Under 5.1 76% GONZ L W ›
Final
1-1 · #128
60
2-0 · #97
90
SMC -17.5 144.5 SMC -14.1 OHIO +3.4 147.9 Over 3.4 89% SMC L W ›
Final
1-0 · #134
92
0-0 · #196
87
UCSB -7.5 161.5 UCSB -4.5 SAC +3.0 146.0 Under 15.5 65% UCSB W L ›
Final
0-1 · #273
102
1-1 · #98
93
UNLV -10.5 157.5 UNLV -13.3 UNLV +2.8 156.2 Under 1.3 88% UNLV L L ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record