Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games7373 final · 0 to play
Lines moved551+ pt since the open · 73 with a line
Totals moved571+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS31-4242% covered
Upsets14outright
Over / Under40-3355% over
Model Favorite57-1678% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
DREX vs SYRDREX -16.5 → SYR -11.528 → SYR146.5 → 143.5▼ 3
L-MD vs STOSTO -2.5 → L-MD -6.59 → L-MD142.5 → 138.5▼ 4
USA vs COPPUSA -17.5 → USA -18.51 → USA143.5 → 133.5▼ 10
W&M @ SJUSJU -25.5 → SJU -28.53 → SJU169.5 → 179.5▲ 10
JMU @ LIUJMU -1.5 → LIU -3.55 → LIU147.5 → 147.5no move
MD @ MARQMARQ -4.5 → MARQ -8.54 → MARQ148.5 → 146.5▼ 2
OU vs NEBNEB -2.5 → NEB -1.51 → OU155.5 → 163.5▲ 8
BCU @ DAYDAY -17.5 → DAY -21.54 → DAY148.5 → 148.5no move
GWEB @ ELONELON -9.5 → ELON -13.54 → ELON148.5 → 154.5▲ 6
WEB @ UCIUCI -7.5 → UCI -11.54 → UCI149.5 → 151.5▲ 2
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-0 · #228
72
0-5 · #352
62
Spread
USA -18.5
✓ COPP W ATS
Total
133.5 ▼10
▲ Over 134
Projected
78–62
✓ USA won
Model: COPP by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 6.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Ohio
1-2 · #128
81
3-0 · #14 AP #12
106
Spread
LOU -31.5
✓ OHIO W ATS
Total
174.5 ▼1
▲ Over 187
Projected
69–95
✓ LOU won
Model: OHIO by 5.2 ✓ Model: Under 10.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-0 · #231
78
3-0 · #20
104
Spread
UVA -20.5
✓ UVA W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲2
▲ Over 182
Projected
67–82
✓ UVA won
Model: MRSH by 4.9 ✗ Model: Under 6.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-0 · #35
74
3-0 · #64
79
Spread
CLEM -1.5
✓ GTWN W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼2
▲ Over 153
Projected
75–71
✗ CLEM lost
Model: CLEM by 2.1 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #335
55
2-1 · #11
71
Spread
TEX -31.5
✓ KC W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲5
▼ Under 126
Projected
64–93
✓ TEX won
Model: KC by 2.6 ✓ Model: Under 2.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #351
52
1-3 · #355
65
Spread
NHVN -1.5
✓ NHVN W ATS
Total
130.5 ▼5
▼ Under 117
Projected
66–69
✓ NHVN won
Model: NHVN by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 5.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-0 · #186
85
2-1 · #229
74
Spread
NE -1.5
✓ UVM W ATS
Total
134.5 ▼3
▲ Over 159
Projected
70–74
✗ NE lost
Model: NE by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 9.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #225
91
2-1 · #261
79
Spread
BU -2.5
✓ MRMK W ATS
Total
135.5
▲ Over 170
Projected
67–73
✗ BU lost
Model: BU by 4.4 ✗ Model: Over 4.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #277
83
1-2 · #157
90
Spread
TOL -10.5
✓ DETM W ATS
Total
159.5 ▼2
▲ Over 173
Projected
75–83
✓ TOL won
Model: DETM by 2.4 ✓ Model: Under 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #223
69
VMI
1-1 · #320
67
Spread
JAX -1.5
✓ JAX W ATS
Total
151.5
▼ Under 136
Projected
75–74
✓ JAX won
Model: VMI by 0.2 ✗ Model: Under 2.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #227
73
FGCU
0-2 · #266
91
Spread
UTC -1.5
✓ FGCU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲1
▲ Over 164
Projected
80–80
✓ FGCU won
Model: FGCU by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 6.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-1 · #151
102
0-2 · #315
95
Spread
KENT -11.5
✓ CLE W ATS
Total
165.5
▲ Over 197
Projected
87–79
✓ KENT won
Model: CLE by 4.0 ✓ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-0 · #78
83
2-1 · #124
69
Spread
PSU -8.5
✓ PSU W ATS
Total
145.5
▲ Over 152
Projected
80–70
✓ PSU won
Model: PSU by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 3.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-0 · #191
79
Yale
2-0 · #126
86
Spread
YALE -20.5
✓ STBK W ATS
Total
150.5
▲ Over 165
Projected
65–86
✓ YALE won
Model: YALE by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 1.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #135
57
2-1 · #16 AP #25
76
Spread
KU -22.5
✓ PRIN W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼4
▼ Under 133
Projected
61–86
✓ KU won
Model: KU by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 2.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #210
69
0-3 · #284
63
Spread
UNCG -1.5
✓ APSU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲1
▼ Under 132
Projected
74–75
✗ UNCG lost
Model: APSU by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 3.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
UTSA
0-2 · #192
84
1-2 · #263
79
Spread
DEN -4.5
✓ UTSA W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼1
▲ Over 163
Projected
78–79
✗ DEN lost
Model: UTSA by 3.2 ✓ Model: Over 8.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #286
44
2-0 · #93
61
Spread
GMU -24.5
✓ UNH W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼2
▼ Under 105
Projected
60–86
✓ GMU won
Model: GMU by 1.3 ✗ Model: Over 1.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #242
69
1-2 · #205
105
Spread
WIN -2.5
✓ WIN W ATS
Total
162.5 ▼2
▲ Over 174
Projected
77–81
✓ WIN won
Model: WIN by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 5.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #248
94
0-2 · #295
86
Spread
WOF -3.5
✓ WOF W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼1
▲ Over 180
Projected
77–73
✓ WOF won
Model: WOF by 0.9 ✓ Model: Under 6.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #50
89
3-1 · #42
82
Spread
MARQ -8.5
✓ MD W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼2
▲ Over 171
Projected
72–78
✗ MARQ lost
Model: MD by 2.6 ✓ Model: Over 2.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
UIC
1-1 · #110
67
0-3 · #362
63
Spread
UIC -9.5
✓ CHST W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼1
▼ Under 130
Projected
84–73
✓ UIC won
Model: UIC by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 1.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-0 · #125
76
0-3 · #220
61
Spread
M-OH -10.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
143.5
▼ Under 137
Projected
76–70
✓ M-OH won
Model: AF by 4.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
0-2 · #314
74
0-3 · #349
63
Spread
L-MD -6.5
✓ L-MD W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼4
▼ Under 137
Projected
70–68
✓ L-MD won
Model: STO by 4.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-0 · #72
85
SMU
3-0 · #55
87
Spread
SMU -7.5
✓ BTLR W ATS
Total
163.5
▲ Over 172
Projected
81–84
✓ SMU won
Model: BTLR by 4.8 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #95
76
2-0 · #111
71
Spread
TEM -3.5
✓ BC W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼3
▲ Over 147
Projected
74–77
✗ TEM lost
Model: BC by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 8.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #136
75
Army
0-2 · #288
52
Spread
HARV -6.5
✓ HARV W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼2
▼ Under 127
Projected
78–75
✓ HARV won
Model: ARMY by 3.4 ✗ Model: Over 7.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #212
84
0-2 · #306
72
Spread
STMN -2.5
✓ STMN W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼1
▲ Over 156
Projected
76–77
✗ SEMO lost
Model: SEMO by 3.3 ✗ Model: Over 0.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #363
75
3-0 · #22
104
Spread
VAN -41.5
✓ UAPB W ATS
Total
172.5 ▼3
▲ Over 179
Projected
64–101
✓ VAN won
Model: UAPB by 4.4 ✓ Model: Under 7.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
ETSU
1-1 · #173
78
1-1 · #292
74
Spread
UNA -1.5
✓ ETSU W ATS
Total
145.5
▲ Over 152
Projected
74–75
✗ UNA lost
Model: ETSU by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #311
64
81
Spread
QUC -5.5
✓ QUC W ATS
Total
165.5 ▼1
▼ Under 145
Projected
80–84
✓ QUC won
Model: SHU by 1.2 ✗ Model: Under 1.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #272
82
1-1 · #218
90
Spread
LONG -15.5
✓ BING W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼2
▲ Over 172
Projected
67–81
✓ LONG won
Model: BING by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #252
68
1-1 · #53
75
Spread
MSST -27.5
✓ SELA W ATS
Total
150.5
▼ Under 143
Projected
62–87
✓ MSST won
Model: SELA by 2.4 ✓ Model: Under 1.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
0-2 · #180
92
1-1 · #246
59
Spread
RAD -6.5
✓ WRST W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼2
▼ Under 151
Projected
76–78
✗ RAD lost
Model: WRST by 4.4 ✓ Model: Under 3.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
0-2 · #262
50
2-0 · #63
80
Spread
SYR -11.5
✓ SYR W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼3
▼ Under 130
Projected
64–82
✓ SYR won
Model: SYR by 5.7 ✓ Model: Over 2.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
UTEP
0-1 · #190
51
2-0 · #58
75
Spread
USU -16.5
✓ USU W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼3
▼ Under 126
Projected
68–84
✓ USU won
Model: UTEP by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 2.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #162
58
2-0 · #86
62
Spread
BOIS -16.5
✓ MTST W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼3
▼ Under 120
Projected
66–84
✓ BOIS won
Model: BOIS by 1.9 ✗ Model: Over 2.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #247
67
2-0 · #123
75
Spread
UCSD -5.5
✓ UCSD W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼2
▼ Under 142
Projected
70–81
✓ UCSD won
Model: UCSD by 4.9 ✓ Model: Over 2.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #265
80
3-0 · #142
84
Spread
SBU -9.5
✓ YSU W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲3
▲ Over 164
Projected
70–78
✓ SBU won
Model: YSU by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #345
72
1-2 · #331
86
Spread
MERC -6.5
✓ MERC W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲2
▲ Over 158
Projected
69–76
✓ MERC won
Model: MERC by 0.1 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
FDU
0-3 · #356
81
NJIT
2-1 · #316
93
Spread
NJIT -2.5
✓ NJIT W ATS
Total
146.5
▲ Over 174
Projected
70–75
✓ NJIT won
Model: NJIT by 2.9 ✓ Model: Under 1.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #322
67
1-2 · #103
77
Spread
TXST -4.5
✓ TXST W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼5
▼ Under 144
Projected
72–79
✓ TXST won
Model: TXST by 3.1 ✓ Model: Over 6.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #336
76
1-1 · #281
74
Spread
UCR -3.5
✓ UND W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼3
▲ Over 150
Projected
74–80
✗ UCR lost
Model: UCR by 2.8 ✗ Model: Over 4.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #163
85
0-2 · #312
73
Spread
PAC -6.5
✓ PAC W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲3
▼ Under 158
Projected
80–73
✓ PAC won
Model: PAC by 0.6 ✓ Model: Under 7.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #285
79
2-1 · #132
99
Spread
MUR -14.5
✓ MUR W ATS
Total
157.5 ▼4
▲ Over 178
Projected
68–80
✓ MUR won
Model: NICH by 2.6 ✗ Model: Under 9.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #217
60
1-1 · #9 AP #13
93
Spread
SJU -28.5
✓ SJU W ATS
Total
179.5 ▲10
▼ Under 153
Projected
70–100
✓ SJU won
Model: SJU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Under 8.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-0 · #200
87
2-0 · #115
91
Spread
DAV -4.5
✓ BGSU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼3
▲ Over 178
Projected
68–73
✓ DAV won
Model: DAV by 1.0 ✗ Model: Under 3.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #250
49
0-1 · #257
67
Spread
UTA -3.5
✓ UTA W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼3
▼ Under 116
Projected
72–76
✓ UTA won
Model: Over 4.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #234
73
3-0 · #101
96
Spread
GW -15.5
✓ GW W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼1
▲ Over 169
Projected
69–85
✓ GW won
Model: GW by 0.8 ✓ Model: Under 1.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
BYU
3-0 · #24 AP #7
84
3-0 · #6 AP #3
86
Spread
CONN -6.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲2
▲ Over 170
Projected
76–77
✓ CONN won
Model: BYU by 5.1 ✓ Model: Under 3.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #280
51
0-1 · #244
68
Spread
LT -8.5
✓ LT W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼1
▼ Under 119
Projected
70–78
✓ LT won
Model: JKST by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-1 · #31
99
3-0 · #27
105
Spread
NEB -1.5
✓ NEB W ATS
Total
163.5 ▲8
▲ Over 204
Projected
78–79
✓ NEB won
Model: OU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 6.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-0 · #96
83
2-0 · #106
98
Spread
SCU -6.5
✓ SCU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼4
▲ Over 181
Projected
74–78
✓ SCU won
Model: NEV by 2.0 ✗ Model: Over 7.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #325
60
0-1 · #120
73
Spread
UNCW -14.5
✓ UPST W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼5
▼ Under 133
Projected
70–84
✓ UNCW won
Model: UPST by 1.0 ✓ Model: Under 1.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #222
68
1-1 · #181
62
Spread
BALL -2.5
✓ LR W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼3
▼ Under 130
Projected
68–75
✗ BALL lost
Model: BALL by 4.8 ✗ Model: Under 4.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #158
79
2-1 · #324
88
Spread
LIU -3.5
✓ LIU W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 167
Projected
75–74
✗ JMU lost
Model: JMU by 4.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #202
82
2-1 · #91
91
Spread
DAY -21.5
✓ BCU W ATS
Total
148.5
▲ Over 173
Projected
68–83
✓ DAY won
Model: BCU by 6.1 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #348
84
Elon
1-1 · #232
95
Spread
ELON -13.5
✓ GWEB W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲6
▲ Over 179
Projected
74–86
✓ ELON won
Model: GWEB by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 5.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #267
85
0-3 · #279
90
Spread
OMA -8.5
✓ SUU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼1
▲ Over 175
Projected
73–81
✓ OMA won
Model: SUU by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #80
64
3-0 · #69
78
Spread
SLU -8.5
✓ SLU W ATS
Total
167.5 ▲2
▼ Under 142
Projected
79–85
✓ SLU won
Model: GCU by 2.0 ✗ Model: Under 3.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-0 · #107
77
2-1 · #32
87
Spread
VILL -10.5
✓ DUQ W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲3
▲ Over 164
Projected
69–82
✓ VILL won
Model: VILL by 2.4 ✗ Model: Under 0.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-0 · #138
83
0-2 · #305
60
Spread
BEL -7.5
✓ BEL W ATS
Total
171.5
▼ Under 143
Projected
85–78
✓ BEL won
Model: ORU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 8.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #226
65
2-1 · #70
72
Spread
MINN -25.5
✓ GB W ATS
Total
146.5
▼ Under 137
Projected
60–87
✓ MINN won
Model: MINN by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 0.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-0 · #219
88
0-1 · #172
81
Spread
UNCO -1.5
✓ UNCO W ATS
Total
153.5
▲ Over 169
Projected
76–78
✗ PEPP lost
Model: PEPP by 3.7 ✗ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-0 · #169
56
2-0 · #122
93
Spread
WYO -11.5
✓ WYO W ATS
Total
160.5 ▲1
▼ Under 149
Projected
72–80
✓ WYO won
Model: PORT by 4.3 ✗ Model: Under 8.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-0 · #82
68
0-0 · #133
76
Spread
UNM -3.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
139.5
▲ Over 144
Projected
75–71
✗ UNM lost
Model: NMSU by 0.1 ✓ Model: Over 6.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #189
79
Utah
3-0 · #73
85
Spread
UTAH -12.5
✓ SHSU W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲3
▲ Over 164
Projected
75–89
✓ UTAH won
Model: UTAH by 1.3 ✗ Model: Over 3.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
0-4 · #366
73
1-2 · #330
80
Spread
MAN -20.5
✓ MVSU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼1
▼ Under 153
Projected
69–87
✓ MAN won
Model: MVSU by 3.1 ✓ Model: Over 1.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #150
74
1-2 · #174
75
Spread
UVU -4.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲1
▼ Under 149
Projected
77–77
✗ UVU lost
Model: FRES by 4.1 ✓ Model: Under 2.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #313
70
0-1 · #149
79
Spread
UCI -11.5
✓ WEB W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲2
▼ Under 149
Projected
70–78
✓ UCI won
Model: WEB by 3.6 ✓ Model: Under 2.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #167
64
1-1 · #161
75
Spread
SF -9.5
✓ SF W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼2
▼ Under 139
Projected
69–76
✓ SF won
Model: BRAD by 2.7 ✗ Model: Under 2.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #344
74
2-1 · #119
83
Spread
SEA -11.5
✓ IDST W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼6
▲ Over 157
Projected
66–75
✓ SEA won
Model: IDST by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #268
62
3-1 · #140
68
Spread
HAW -16.5
✓ UTU W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼7
▼ Under 130
Projected
67–82
✓ HAW won
Model: UTU by 1.3 ✓ Model: Under 0.7 ✓
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
3-0 · #228
72
0-5 · #352
62
USA -18.5 133.5 USA -16.7 COPP +1.8 139.9 Over 6.4 93% USA W W ›
Final
1-2 · #128
81
3-0 · #14
106
LOU -31.5 174.5 LOU -26.3 OHIO +5.2 163.9 Under 10.6 99% LOU W L ›
Final
3-0 · #231
78
3-0 · #20
104
UVA -20.5 155.5 UVA -15.6 MRSH +4.9 149.1 Under 6.4 91% UVA L L ›
Final
3-0 · #35
74
3-0 · #64
79
CLEM -1.5 142.5 CLEM -3.6 CLEM +2.1 146.0 Over 3.5 62% CLEM L W ›
Final
0-2 · #335
55
2-1 · #11
71
TEX -31.5 159.5 TEX -28.9 KC +2.6 157.3 Under 2.2 99% TEX W W ›
Final
0-3 · #351
52
1-3 · #355
65
NHVN -1.5 130.5 NHVN -3.1 NHVN +1.6 135.7 Over 5.2 61% NHVN W L ›
Final
1-0 · #186
85
2-1 · #229
74
NE -1.5 134.5 NE -3.3 NE +1.8 143.8 Over 9.3 61% NE L W ›
Final
0-3 · #225
91
2-1 · #261
79
BU -2.5 135.5 BU -6.9 BU +4.4 139.9 Over 4.4 73% BU L W ›
Final
0-2 · #277
83
1-2 · #157
90
TOL -10.5 159.5 TOL -8.1 DETM +2.4 158.7 Under 0.8 76% TOL W L ›
Final
0-2 · #223
69
1-1 · #320
67
JAX -1.5 151.5 JAX -1.3 VMI +0.2 149.2 Under 2.3 55% JAX L W ›
Final
0-2 · #227
73
0-2 · #266
91
UTC -1.5 152.5 FGCU -0.3 FGCU +1.8 159.4 Over 6.9 51% FGCU W W ›
Final
2-1 · #151
102
0-2 · #315
95
KENT -11.5 165.5 KENT -7.5 CLE +4.0 165.8 Over 0.3 74% KENT W W ›
Final
3-0 · #78
83
2-1 · #124
69
PSU -8.5 145.5 PSU -10.3 PSU +1.8 149.4 Over 3.9 82% PSU W W ›
Final
1-0 · #191
79
2-0 · #126
86
YALE -20.5 150.5 YALE -20.9 YALE +0.4 151.5 Over 1.0 97% YALE L W ›
Final
1-1 · #135
57
2-1 · #16
76
KU -22.5 144.5 KU -24.9 KU +2.4 147.4 Over 2.9 99% KU L L ›
Final
1-1 · #210
69
0-3 · #284
63
UNCG -1.5 145.5 UNCG -0.6 APSU +0.9 149.2 Over 3.7 52% UNCG W L ›
Final
0-2 · #192
84
1-2 · #263
79
DEN -4.5 148.5 DEN -1.3 UTSA +3.2 156.6 Over 8.1 55% DEN W W ›
Final
0-2 · #286
44
2-0 · #93
61
GMU -24.5 144.5 GMU -25.8 GMU +1.3 146.4 Over 1.9 99% GMU L L ›
Final
1-1 · #242
69
1-2 · #205
105
WIN -2.5 162.5 WIN -4.0 WIN +1.5 157.2 Under 5.3 64% WIN W L ›
Final
1-2 · #248
94
0-2 · #295
86
WOF -3.5 156.5 WOF -4.4 WOF +0.9 150.1 Under 6.4 65% WOF W L ›
Final
2-1 · #50
89
3-1 · #42
82
MARQ -8.5 146.5 MARQ -5.9 MD +2.6 149.4 Over 2.9 70% MARQ W W ›
Final
1-1 · #110
67
0-3 · #362
63
UIC -9.5 156.5 UIC -10.9 UIC +1.4 157.6 Over 1.1 83% UIC L L ›
Final
1-0 · #125
76
0-3 · #220
61
M-OH -10.5 143.5 M-OH -6.0 AF +4.5 145.4 Over 1.9 70% M-OH L L ›
Final
0-2 · #314
74
0-3 · #349
63
L-MD -6.5 138.5 L-MD -2.1 STO +4.4 138.5 — 57% L-MD L ›
Final
3-0 · #72
85
3-0 · #55
87
SMU -7.5 163.5 SMU -2.7 BTLR +4.8 164.8 Over 1.3 59% SMU W W ›
Final
1-2 · #95
76
2-0 · #111
71
TEM -3.5 142.5 TEM -2.8 BC +0.7 150.6 Over 8.1 60% TEM W W ›
Final
1-1 · #136
75
0-2 · #288
52
HARV -6.5 146.5 HARV -3.1 ARMY +3.4 153.5 Over 7.0 61% HARV L L ›
Final
2-2 · #212
84
0-2 · #306
72
STMN -2.5 152.5 SEMO -0.8 SEMO +3.3 152.6 Over 0.1 53% SEMO L W ›
Final
0-4 · #363
75
3-0 · #22
104
VAN -41.5 172.5 VAN -37.1 UAPB +4.4 165.3 Under 7.3 100% VAN W L ›
Final
1-1 · #173
78
1-1 · #292
74
UNA -1.5 145.5 UNA -1.2 ETSU +0.3 148.3 Over 2.8 54% UNA W W ›
Final
0-2 · #311
64
QUC -5.5 165.5 QUC -4.3 SHU +1.2 163.9 Under 1.6 65% QUC L W ›
Final
0-3 · #272
82
1-1 · #218
90
LONG -15.5 147.5 LONG -13.2 BING +2.3 148.0 Over 0.5 88% LONG W W ›
Final
0-3 · #252
68
1-1 · #53
75
MSST -27.5 150.5 MSST -25.1 SELA +2.4 149.2 Under 1.3 99% MSST W W ›
Final
0-2 · #180
92
1-1 · #246
59
RAD -6.5 156.5 RAD -2.1 WRST +4.4 153.1 Under 3.4 57% RAD W W ›
Final
0-2 · #262
50
2-0 · #63
80
SYR -11.5 143.5 SYR -17.2 SYR +5.7 145.8 Over 2.3 93% SYR W L ›
Final
0-1 · #190
51
2-0 · #58
75
USU -16.5 149.5 USU -15.9 UTEP +0.6 151.9 Over 2.4 92% USU L L ›
Final
0-3 · #162
58
2-0 · #86
62
BOIS -16.5 147.5 BOIS -18.4 BOIS +1.9 149.6 Over 2.1 95% BOIS L L ›
Final
1-1 · #247
67
2-0 · #123
75
UCSD -5.5 148.5 UCSD -10.4 UCSD +4.9 150.6 Over 2.1 82% UCSD W L ›
Final
1-1 · #265
80
3-0 · #142
84
SBU -9.5 146.5 SBU -7.2 YSU +2.3 147.8 Over 1.3 74% SBU W W ›
Final
0-2 · #345
72
1-2 · #331
86
MERC -6.5 146.5 MERC -6.6 MERC +0.1 145.0 Under 1.5 72% MERC W L ›
Final
0-3 · #356
81
2-1 · #316
93
NJIT -2.5 146.5 NJIT -5.4 NJIT +2.9 144.7 Under 1.8 68% NJIT W L ›
Final
0-3 · #322
67
1-2 · #103
77
TXST -4.5 144.5 TXST -7.6 TXST +3.1 151.1 Over 6.6 75% TXST W L ›
Final
0-3 · #336
76
1-1 · #281
74
UCR -3.5 148.5 UCR -6.3 UCR +2.8 153.4 Over 4.9 71% UCR L W ›
Final
1-1 · #163
85
0-2 · #312
73
PAC -6.5 159.5 PAC -7.1 PAC +0.6 152.3 Under 7.2 73% PAC W W ›
Final
0-3 · #285
79
2-1 · #132
99
MUR -14.5 157.5 MUR -11.9 NICH +2.6 148.5 Under 9.0 85% MUR L L ›
Final
1-1 · #217
60
1-1 · #9
93
SJU -28.5 179.5 SJU -30.0 SJU +1.5 170.8 Under 8.7 100% SJU W W ›
Final
2-0 · #200
87
2-0 · #115
91
DAV -4.5 144.5 DAV -5.5 DAV +1.0 140.8 Under 3.7 68% DAV L L ›
Final
0-1 · #250
49
0-1 · #257
67
UTA -3.5 143.5 UTA -3.5 — 147.7 Over 4.2 62% UTA L ›
Final
1-1 · #234
73
3-0 · #101
96
GW -15.5 155.5 GW -16.3 GW +0.8 154.1 Under 1.4 92% GW W L ›
Final
3-0 · #24
84
3-0 · #6
86
CONN -6.5 156.5 CONN -1.4 BYU +5.1 153.1 Under 3.4 55% CONN W L ›
Final
0-2 · #280
51
0-1 · #244
68
LT -8.5 146.5 LT -8.4 JKST +0.1 148.0 Over 1.5 77% LT L L ›
Final
2-1 · #31
99
3-0 · #27
105
NEB -1.5 163.5 NEB -1.0 OU +0.5 156.7 Under 6.8 54% NEB L L ›
Final
3-0 · #96
83
2-0 · #106
98
SCU -6.5 144.5 SCU -4.5 NEV +2.0 152.0 Over 7.5 65% SCU L W ›
Final
1-1 · #325
60
0-1 · #120
73
UNCW -14.5 155.5 UNCW -13.5 UPST +1.0 154.1 Under 1.4 88% UNCW W W ›
Final
0-2 · #222
68
1-1 · #181
62
BALL -2.5 146.5 BALL -7.3 BALL +4.8 142.5 Under 4.0 74% BALL L W ›
Final
1-2 · #158
79
2-1 · #324
88
LIU -3.5 147.5 JMU -1.0 JMU +4.5 149.2 Over 1.7 53% JMU L W ›
Final
0-2 · #202
82
2-1 · #91
91
DAY -21.5 148.5 DAY -15.4 BCU +6.1 151.0 Over 2.5 91% DAY W W ›
Final
0-2 · #348
84
1-1 · #232
95
ELON -13.5 154.5 ELON -11.2 GWEB +2.3 159.7 Over 5.2 84% ELON W W ›
Final
0-2 · #267
85
0-3 · #279
90
OMA -8.5 153.5 OMA -7.7 SUU +0.8 154.0 Over 0.5 75% OMA W W ›
Final
2-1 · #80
64
3-0 · #69
78
SLU -8.5 167.5 SLU -6.5 GCU +2.0 163.9 Under 3.6 72% SLU L W ›
Final
3-0 · #107
77
2-1 · #32
87
VILL -10.5 151.5 VILL -12.9 VILL +2.4 151.1 Under 0.4 87% VILL L L ›
Final
2-0 · #138
83
0-2 · #305
60
BEL -7.5 171.5 BEL -7.0 ORU +0.5 162.9 Under 8.6 73% BEL L W ›
Final
0-3 · #226
65
2-1 · #70
72
MINN -25.5 146.5 MINN -26.7 MINN +1.2 146.9 Over 0.4 99% MINN L L ›
Final
0-0 · #219
88
0-1 · #172
81
UNCO -1.5 153.5 PEPP -2.2 PEPP +3.7 153.8 Over 0.3 58% PEPP L W ›
Final
2-0 · #169
56
2-0 · #122
93
WYO -11.5 160.5 WYO -7.3 PORT +4.3 152.1 Under 8.4 74% WYO L W ›
Final
3-0 · #82
68
0-0 · #133
76
UNM -3.5 139.5 UNM -3.4 NMSU +0.1 145.9 Over 6.4 62% UNM W W ›
Final
0-1 · #189
79
3-0 · #73
85
UTAH -12.5 159.5 UTAH -13.8 UTAH +1.3 163.4 Over 3.9 89% UTAH L W ›
Final
0-4 · #366
73
1-2 · #330
80
MAN -20.5 154.5 MAN -17.4 MVSU +3.1 155.6 Over 1.1 94% MAN W L ›
Final
0-1 · #150
74
1-2 · #174
75
UVU -4.5 156.5 UVU -0.4 FRES +4.1 153.6 Under 2.9 51% UVU W W ›
Final
0-2 · #313
70
0-1 · #149
79
UCI -11.5 151.5 UCI -7.9 WEB +3.6 148.6 Under 2.9 75% UCI W W ›
Final
1-2 · #167
64
1-1 · #161
75
SF -9.5 146.5 SF -6.8 BRAD +2.7 144.5 Under 2.0 72% SF L W ›
Final
1-1 · #344
74
2-1 · #119
83
SEA -11.5 138.5 SEA -9.2 IDST +2.3 140.5 Over 2.0 79% SEA W W ›
Final
2-3 · #268
62
3-1 · #140
68
HAW -16.5 149.5 HAW -15.2 UTU +1.3 148.8 Under 0.7 91% HAW W W ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record