Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games6666 final · 0 to play
Lines moved401+ pt since the open · 66 with a line
Totals moved541+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS38-2858% covered
Upsets16outright
Over / Under34-3252% over
Model Favorite55-1183% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
MUR vs GWMUR -7.5 → GW -7.515 → GW165.5 → 167.5▲ 2
STBK vs BCUSTBK -1.5 → BCU -4.56 → BCU145.5 → 145.5no move
KSU @ IUIU -8.5 → IU -10.52 → IU155.5 → 164.5▲ 9
TNST @ UNCAUNCA -5.5 → UNCA -5.5no move155.5 → 164.5▲ 9
OMA vs JMUJMU -2.5 → JMU -1.51 → OMA160.5 → 152.5▼ 8
UNCG vs DELUNCG -1.5 → UNCG -1.5no move149.5 → 142.5▼ 7
SAM vs GASTSAM -5.5 → SAM -5.5no move153.5 → 146.5▼ 7
CAM @ WAKEWAKE -17.5 → WAKE -17.5no move152.5 → 159.5▲ 7
CREI vs ISUISU -6.5 → ISU -9.53 → ISU151.5 → 152.5▲ 1
KENN vs ORUKENN -7.5 → KENN -8.51 → KENN172.5 → 166.5▼ 6
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-2 · #191
61
1-4 · #202
54
Spread
BCU -4.5
✓ STBK W ATS
Total
145.5
▼ Under 115
Projected
74–78
✗ BCU lost
Model: STBK by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 6.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #165
72
3-0 · #160
69
Spread
LIB -6.5
✓ TOW W ATS
Total
137.5 ▲1
▲ Over 141
Projected
67–70
✗ LIB lost
Model: TOW by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #10 AP #11
89
1-3 · #145
56
Spread
MSU -19.5
✓ MSU W ATS
Total
140.5
▲ Over 145
Projected
85–63
✓ MSU won
Model: MSU by 2.4 ✓ Model: Over 7.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-2 · #62
63
4-2 · #71
68
Spread
ND -6.5
✓ RUTG W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼4
▼ Under 131
Projected
71–76
✓ ND won
Model: RUTG by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 6.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #163
68
2-3 · #223
53
Spread
PAC -2.5
✓ PAC W ATS
Total
135.5
▼ Under 121
Projected
72–68
✓ PAC won
Model: PAC by 1.7 ✓ Model: Over 4.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-5 · #284
60
1-3 · #206
73
Spread
UNCG -1.5
✓ DEL W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼7
▼ Under 133
Projected
76–76
✓ DEL won
Model: DEL by 2.0 ✓ Model: Over 9.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-1 · #108
81
1-3 · #143
51
Spread
TLSA -5.5
✓ TLSA W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼1
▼ Under 132
Projected
78–75
✓ TLSA won
Model: SJSU by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #37
60
5-0 · #13 AP #15
78
Spread
ISU -9.5
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲1
▼ Under 138
Projected
72–82
✓ ISU won
Model: ISU by 1.2 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-3 · #342
84
Army
0-5 · #288
67
Spread
ETAM -2.5
✓ ETAM W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲2
▲ Over 151
Projected
74–73
✓ ETAM won
Model: ARMY by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 3.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-1 · #48 AP #23
81
4-1 · #86
70
Spread
NCSU -6.5
✓ NCSU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼1
▼ Under 151
Projected
77–74
✓ NCSU won
Model: BOIS by 3.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-2 · #105
80
2-2 · #186
65
Spread
URI -4.5
✓ URI W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼1
▲ Over 145
Projected
79–73
✓ URI won
Model: URI by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 7.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-4 · #184
78
0-5 · #208
63
Spread
SAM -5.5
✓ SAM W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼7
▼ Under 141
Projected
80–72
✓ SAM won
Model: SAM by 2.8 ✓ Model: Over 5.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-1 · #63
60
4-2 · #16
71
Spread
KU -4.5
✓ KU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲1
▼ Under 131
Projected
72–76
✓ KU won
Model: SYR by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 3.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
UTEP
0-3 · #190
59
UAB
4-2 · #102
75
Spread
UAB -8.5
✓ UAB W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼2
▼ Under 134
Projected
72–80
✓ UAB won
Model: UAB by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 5.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #131
72
1-5 · #113
51
Spread
UNI -8.5
✓ UNI W ATS
Total
134.5 ▼1
▼ Under 123
Projected
73–64
✓ UNI won
Model: Over 2.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #9 AP #14
96
4-0 · #29
81
Spread
SJU -5.5
✓ SJU W ATS
Total
159.5 ▼1
▲ Over 177
Projected
88–78
✓ SJU won
Model: SJU by 4.6 ✓ Model: Over 5.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-1 · #148
83
0-5 · #305
91
Spread
KENN -8.5
✓ ORU W ATS
Total
166.5 ▼6
▲ Over 174
Projected
89–79
✗ KENN lost
Model: KENN by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 1.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
LMU
5-1 · #121
70
Ohio
1-5 · #128
58
Spread
LMU -3.5
✓ LMU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼1
▼ Under 128
Projected
76–73
✓ LMU won
Model: OHIO by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 4.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-0 · #123
87
3-3 · #167
77
Spread
BRAD -1.5
✓ UCSD W ATS
Total
145.5
▲ Over 164
Projected
74–72
✓ UCSD won
Model: UCSD by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
MTSU
2-2 · #154
62
3-1 · #127
72
Spread
MCN -9.5
✓ MCN W ATS
Total
147.5
▼ Under 134
Projected
74–80
✓ MCN won
Model: MTSU by 3.4 ✗ Model: Over 5.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
6-0 · #67
81
USC
5-0 · #36
83
Spread
USC -6.5
✓ HALL W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼1
▲ Over 164
Projected
74–78
✓ USC won
Model: HALL by 2.7 ✓ Model: Over 7.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
6-0 · #7 AP #17
76
6-0 · #2 AP #3
73
Spread
HOU -2.5
✓ TENN W ATS
Total
136.5 ▲2
▲ Over 149
Projected
65–70
✗ HOU lost
Model: HOU by 2.3 ✗ Model: Under 1.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #142
70
5-0 · #44 AP #16
85
Spread
UNC -10.5
✓ UNC W ATS
Total
152.5
▲ Over 155
Projected
69–82
✓ UNC won
Model: UNC by 2.1 ✓ Model: Under 1.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-2 · #150
75
2-2 · #201
52
Spread
UVU -1.5
✓ UVU W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼1
▼ Under 127
Projected
77–79
✗ SDST lost
Model: SDST by 3.6 ✗ Model: Over 4.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #262
71
0-5 · #345
66
Spread
DREX -5.5
✓ MORG W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼6
▼ Under 137
Projected
77–71
✓ DREX won
Model: DREX by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #245
75
1-3 · #271
73
Spread
UNCA -5.5
✓ TNST W ATS
Total
164.5 ▲9
▼ Under 148
Projected
78–83
✗ UNCA lost
Model: TNST by 1.4 ✓ Model: Under 3.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #217
92
2-2 · #253
58
Spread
ACU -1.5
✓ W&M W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 150
Projected
74–72
✓ W&M won
Model: W&M by 4.2 ✓ Model: Under 1.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-2 · #146
61
5-0 · #203
76
Spread
CBU -7.5
✓ CBU W ATS
Total
146.5
▼ Under 137
Projected
70–77
✓ CBU won
Model: USD by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 0.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-5 · #278
60
5-0 · #33
113
Spread
OSU -30.5
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲4
▲ Over 173
Projected
63–89
✓ OSU won
Model: MSM by 4.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-4 · #279
77
3-3 · #158
88
Spread
JMU -1.5
✓ JMU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼8
▲ Over 165
Projected
78–81
✓ JMU won
Model: JMU by 1.0 ✓ Model: Over 6.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-5 · #357
67
1-4 · #325
82
Spread
UPST -7.5
✓ UPST W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼2
▲ Over 149
Projected
73–80
✓ UPST won
Model: NCCU by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 3.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-3 · #261
87
5-1 · #78
96
Spread
PSU -14.5
✓ BU W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼2
▲ Over 183
Projected
66–80
✓ PSU won
Model: BU by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 3.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #329
59
4-1 · #81
89
Spread
FSU -26.5
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲2
▼ Under 148
Projected
67–90
✓ FSU won
Model: CSUB by 3.6 ✗ Model: Under 2.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #234
75
4-1 · #32
89
Spread
VILL -22.5
✓ ODU W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲3
▲ Over 164
Projected
62–84
✓ VILL won
Model: ODU by 0.6 ✓ Model: Under 1.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #180
79
2-3 · #303
62
Spread
WRST -9.5
✓ WRST W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼3
▼ Under 141
Projected
80–70
✓ WRST won
Model: WRST by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 3.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
Rice
1-5 · #177
63
FGCU
3-2 · #266
78
Spread
FGCU -5.5
✓ FGCU W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲1
▼ Under 141
Projected
76–80
✓ FGCU won
Model: RICE by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 6.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #300
69
1-4 · #295
74
Spread
HCU -2.5
✓ BELL W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼2
▼ Under 143
Projected
73–75
✓ BELL won
Model: BELL by 5.0 ✓ Model: Over 3.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-5 · #159
74
2-5 · #364
68
Spread
HAMP -6.5
✓ UMES W ATS
Total
124.5 ▼2
▲ Over 142
Projected
68–62
✓ HAMP won
Model: UMES by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 5.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-6 · #362
77
0-5 · #249
90
Spread
PFW -12.5
✓ PFW W ATS
Total
149.5
▲ Over 167
Projected
71–82
✓ PFW won
Model: CHST by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 3.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-2 · #241
91
UCF
5-1 · #39
102
Spread
UCF -13.5
✓ QUIN W ATS
Total
162.5 ▼1
▲ Over 193
Projected
74–89
✓ UCF won
Model: UCF by 1.2 ✗ Model: Under 0.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #243
51
4-2 · #89
99
Spread
WAKE -17.5
✓ WAKE W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲7
▼ Under 150
Projected
71–87
✓ WAKE won
Model: CAM by 1.4 ✗ Model: Under 1.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-4 · #216
55
2-2 · #236
78
Spread
MRST -7.5
✓ MRST W ATS
Total
132.5 ▲2
▲ Over 133
Projected
63–70
✓ MRST won
Model: LEH by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 0.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-7 · #352
68
0-4 · #347
65
Spread
RID -8.5
✓ COPP W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼1
▼ Under 133
Projected
67–77
✗ RID lost
Model: RID by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 5.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #93
74
FAU
4-1 · #109
65
Spread
GMU -4.5
✓ GMU W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼1
▼ Under 139
Projected
76–73
✓ GMU won
Model: FAU by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 5.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #361
60
1-4 · #240
81
Spread
CARK -5.5
✓ CARK W ATS
Total
139.5
▲ Over 141
Projected
69–72
✓ CARK won
Model: EIU by 2.7 ✗ Model: Over 2.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-3 · #132
96
6-1 · #101
95
Spread
GW -7.5
✓ MUR W ATS
Total
167.5 ▲2
▲ Over 191
Projected
79–87
✗ GW lost
Model: GW by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #111
79
2-4 · #135
75
Spread
TEM -8.5
✓ PRIN W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼2
▲ Over 154
Projected
80–73
✓ TEM won
Model: PRIN by 1.2 ✓ Model: Over 7.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-1 · #83
69
5-0 · #38 AP #25
86
Spread
IU -10.5
✓ IU W ATS
Total
164.5 ▲9
▼ Under 155
Projected
78–84
✓ IU won
Model: KSU by 4.6 ✗ Model: Under 3.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-6 · #366
84
4-2 · #28
120
Spread
TA&M -42.5
✓ MVSU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲1
▲ Over 204
Projected
57–98
✓ TA&M won
Model: MVSU by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 0.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
0-4 · #306
84
2-4 · #164
68
Spread
SEMO -1.5
✓ SEMO W ATS
Total
170.5 ▲1
▼ Under 152
Projected
81–83
✗ CP lost
Model: CP by 3.5 ✗ Model: Under 7.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-6 · #353
66
6-0 · #54
98
Spread
MIZ -34.5
✓ SCST W ATS
Total
160.5 ▼1
▲ Over 164
Projected
63–93
✓ MIZ won
Model: SCST by 4.7 ✓ Model: Under 4.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-5 · #254
71
3-2 · #112
79
Spread
UNT -12.5
✓ EWU W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲1
▲ Over 150
Projected
65–77
✓ UNT won
Model: EWU by 0.2 ✓ Model: Over 0.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #334
59
2-3 · #210
77
Spread
APSU -6.5
✓ APSU W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲1
▼ Under 136
Projected
69–78
✓ APSU won
Model: APSU by 2.4 ✓ Model: Under 1.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-3 · #139
94
5-1 · #60
100
Spread
ASU -4.5
✓ ASU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▼2
▲ Over 194
Projected
76–82
✓ ASU won
Model: ASU by 1.9 ✓ Model: Over 0.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-1 · #21 AP #21
72
5-0 · #8 AP #7
102
Spread
MICH -4.5
✓ MICH W ATS
Total
163.5 ▲3
▲ Over 174
Projected
82–86
✓ MICH won
Model: AUB by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 4.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-3 · #205
73
6-0 · #27
80
Spread
NEB -14.5
✓ WIN W ATS
Total
166.5 ▲1
▼ Under 153
Projected
74–88
✓ NEB won
Model: WIN by 1.1 ✓ Model: Under 4.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-0 · #133
57
1-3 · #149
45
Spread
UCI -2.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼1
▼ Under 102
Projected
74–71
✓ NMSU won
Model: NMSU by 4.9 ✓ Model: Over 5.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
UTSA
1-3 · #192
77
2-4 · #296
64
Spread
GASO -3.5
✓ UTSA W ATS
Total
160.5 ▼2
▼ Under 141
Projected
80–80
✓ UTSA won
Model: UTSA by 3.6 ✓ Model: Under 1.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-5 · #204
95
2-3 · #273
87
Spread
MONT -4.5
✓ OAK W ATS
Total
162.5 ▼2
▲ Over 182
Projected
82–82
✓ OAK won
Model: OAK by 4.6 ✓ Model: Over 1.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #274
68
2-4 · #268
63
Spread
PRST -1.5
✓ PRST W ATS
Total
146.5 ▼1
▼ Under 131
Projected
77–76
✓ PRST won
Model: PRST by 0.2 ✓ Model: Over 6.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-1 · #50
61
6-0 · #17 AP #12
100
Spread
GONZ -14.5
✓ GONZ W ATS
Total
157.5
▲ Over 161
Projected
71–85
✓ GONZ won
Model: MD by 0.1 ✗ Model: Under 1.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #46
69
Iowa
5-0 · #43
74
Spread
IOWA -4.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼6
▲ Over 143
Projected
75–80
✓ IOWA won
Model: IOWA by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 14.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
UCLA
5-1 · #26 AP #18
72
5-1 · #92
80
Spread
UCLA -7.5
✓ CAL W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲1
▲ Over 152
Projected
78–69
✗ UCLA lost
Model: UCLA by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 3.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-2 · #75
97
4-1 · #57
80
Spread
ORE -2.5
✓ SDSU W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼2
▲ Over 177
Projected
71–75
✗ ORE lost
Model: ORE by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 4.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
UNLV
3-3 · #98
76
3-2 · #15 AP #8
115
Spread
ALA -13.5
✓ ALA W ATS
Total
181.5
▲ Over 191
Projected
81–98
✓ ALA won
Model: ALA by 3.4 ✓ Model: Under 2.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
Utah
5-1 · #73
58
3-2 · #80
68
Spread
GCU -5.5
✓ GCU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼6
▼ Under 126
Projected
81–81
✗ UTAH lost
Model: UTAH by 5.5 ✗ Model: Over 8.0 ✗
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
2-2 · #191
61
1-4 · #202
54
BCU -4.5 145.5 BCU -4.0 STBK +0.5 152.4 Over 6.9 64% BCU W L ›
Final
3-2 · #165
72
3-0 · #160
69
LIB -6.5 137.5 LIB -3.0 TOW +3.5 136.5 Under 1.0 60% LIB W L ›
Final
5-0 · #10
89
1-3 · #145
56
MSU -19.5 140.5 MSU -21.9 MSU +2.4 147.5 Over 7.0 97% MSU W W ›
Final
4-2 · #62
63
4-2 · #71
68
ND -6.5 140.5 ND -5.4 RUTG +1.1 146.5 Over 6.0 68% ND W L ›
Final
3-2 · #163
68
2-3 · #223
53
PAC -2.5 135.5 PAC -4.2 PAC +1.7 140.1 Over 4.6 64% PAC W L ›
Final
1-5 · #284
60
1-3 · #206
73
UNCG -1.5 142.5 DEL -0.5 DEL +2.0 152.1 Over 9.6 52% DEL W L ›
Final
3-1 · #108
81
1-3 · #143
51
TLSA -5.5 149.5 TLSA -3.1 SJSU +2.4 153.0 Over 3.5 61% TLSA L L ›
Final
3-2 · #37
60
5-0 · #13
78
ISU -9.5 152.5 ISU -10.7 ISU +1.2 154.0 Over 1.5 82% ISU W L ›
Final
1-3 · #342
84
0-5 · #288
67
ETAM -2.5 143.5 ETAM -1.5 ARMY +1.0 147.3 Over 3.8 55% ETAM L W ›
Final
4-1 · #48
81
4-1 · #86
70
NCSU -6.5 152.5 NCSU -3.0 BOIS +3.5 151.0 Under 1.5 60% NCSU L W ›
Final
4-2 · #105
80
2-2 · #186
65
URI -4.5 144.5 URI -5.2 URI +0.7 151.8 Over 7.3 68% URI W W ›
Final
3-4 · #184
78
0-5 · #208
63
SAM -5.5 146.5 SAM -8.3 SAM +2.8 151.7 Over 5.2 77% SAM W L ›
Final
4-1 · #63
60
4-2 · #16
71
KU -4.5 144.5 KU -4.4 SYR +0.1 147.7 Over 3.2 65% KU L L ›
Final
0-3 · #190
59
4-2 · #102
75
UAB -8.5 146.5 UAB -8.8 UAB +0.3 152.0 Over 5.5 78% UAB W L ›
Final
5-0 · #131
72
1-5 · #113
51
UNI -8.5 134.5 UNI -8.5 — 137.0 Over 2.5 77% UNI L ›
Final
3-2 · #9
96
4-0 · #29
81
SJU -5.5 159.5 SJU -10.1 SJU +4.6 165.2 Over 5.7 81% SJU W W ›
Final
2-1 · #148
83
0-5 · #305
91
KENN -8.5 166.5 KENN -9.6 KENN +1.1 168.4 Over 1.9 80% KENN L W ›
Final
5-1 · #121
70
1-5 · #128
58
LMU -3.5 144.5 LMU -2.5 OHIO +1.0 148.8 Over 4.3 59% LMU L L ›
Final
4-0 · #123
87
3-3 · #167
77
BRAD -1.5 145.5 UCSD -2.0 UCSD +3.5 145.7 Over 0.2 57% UCSD W W ›
Final
2-2 · #154
62
3-1 · #127
72
MCN -9.5 147.5 MCN -6.1 MTSU +3.4 153.0 Over 5.5 70% MCN L L ›
Final
6-0 · #67
81
5-0 · #36
83
USC -6.5 145.5 USC -3.8 HALL +2.7 152.5 Over 7.0 63% USC W W ›
Final
6-0 · #7
76
6-0 · #2
73
HOU -2.5 136.5 HOU -4.8 HOU +2.3 135.3 Under 1.2 66% HOU L L ›
Final
5-0 · #142
70
5-0 · #44
85
UNC -10.5 152.5 UNC -12.6 UNC +2.1 151.3 Under 1.3 86% UNC W L ›
Final
1-2 · #150
75
2-2 · #201
52
UVU -1.5 151.5 SDST -2.1 SDST +3.6 155.9 Over 4.4 57% SDST L L ›
Final
2-4 · #262
71
0-5 · #345
66
DREX -5.5 143.5 DREX -6.3 DREX +0.8 148.0 Over 4.5 71% DREX L L ›
Final
0-3 · #245
75
1-3 · #271
73
UNCA -5.5 164.5 UNCA -4.1 TNST +1.4 160.8 Under 3.7 64% UNCA W W ›
Final
3-2 · #217
92
2-2 · #253
58
ACU -1.5 147.5 W&M -2.7 W&M +4.2 145.9 Under 1.6 59% W&M W L ›
Final
2-2 · #146
61
5-0 · #203
76
CBU -7.5 146.5 CBU -6.5 USD +1.0 147.1 Over 0.6 72% CBU L L ›
Final
1-5 · #278
60
5-0 · #33
113
OSU -30.5 151.5 OSU -25.9 MSM +4.6 151.5 — 99% OSU L ›
Final
1-4 · #279
77
3-3 · #158
88
JMU -1.5 152.5 JMU -2.5 JMU +1.0 159.3 Over 6.8 59% JMU W W ›
Final
0-5 · #357
67
1-4 · #325
82
UPST -7.5 148.5 UPST -7.0 NCCU +0.5 152.4 Over 3.9 73% UPST L W ›
Final
3-3 · #261
87
5-1 · #78
96
PSU -14.5 142.5 PSU -13.6 BU +0.9 145.7 Over 3.2 88% PSU W W ›
Final
2-3 · #329
59
4-1 · #81
89
FSU -26.5 159.5 FSU -22.9 CSUB +3.6 157.0 Under 2.5 98% FSU L W ›
Final
2-4 · #234
75
4-1 · #32
89
VILL -22.5 147.5 VILL -21.9 ODU +0.6 145.7 Under 1.8 97% VILL W L ›
Final
1-3 · #180
79
2-3 · #303
62
WRST -9.5 147.5 WRST -9.8 WRST +0.3 150.5 Over 3.0 80% WRST W L ›
Final
1-5 · #177
63
3-2 · #266
78
FGCU -5.5 149.5 FGCU -4.5 RICE +1.0 155.8 Over 6.3 65% FGCU L L ›
Final
1-1 · #300
69
1-4 · #295
74
HCU -2.5 144.5 BELL -2.5 BELL +5.0 147.6 Over 3.1 59% BELL W L ›
Final
1-5 · #159
74
2-5 · #364
68
HAMP -6.5 124.5 HAMP -5.6 UMES +0.9 129.7 Over 5.2 69% HAMP W W ›
Final
0-6 · #362
77
0-5 · #249
90
PFW -12.5 149.5 PFW -11.9 CHST +0.6 152.9 Over 3.4 85% PFW L W ›
Final
3-2 · #241
91
5-1 · #39
102
UCF -13.5 162.5 UCF -14.7 UCF +1.2 162.4 Under 0.1 90% UCF L L ›
Final
2-3 · #243
51
4-2 · #89
99
WAKE -17.5 159.5 WAKE -16.1 CAM +1.4 157.9 Under 1.6 92% WAKE L W ›
Final
1-4 · #216
55
2-2 · #236
78
MRST -7.5 132.5 MRST -7.2 LEH +0.3 132.6 Over 0.1 74% MRST L W ›
Final
0-7 · #352
68
0-4 · #347
65
RID -8.5 139.5 RID -10.0 RID +1.5 144.6 Over 5.1 81% RID L L ›
Final
5-0 · #93
74
4-1 · #109
65
GMU -4.5 143.5 GMU -3.8 FAU +0.8 148.8 Over 5.3 63% GMU L L ›
Final
1-3 · #361
60
1-4 · #240
81
CARK -5.5 139.5 CARK -2.8 EIU +2.7 141.6 Over 2.1 60% CARK L W ›
Final
4-3 · #132
96
6-1 · #101
95
GW -7.5 167.5 GW -8.0 GW +0.5 165.7 Under 1.8 76% GW L L ›
Final
3-2 · #111
79
2-4 · #135
75
TEM -8.5 145.5 TEM -7.3 PRIN +1.2 153.3 Over 7.8 74% TEM W W ›
Final
5-1 · #83
69
5-0 · #38
86
IU -10.5 164.5 IU -5.9 KSU +4.6 161.2 Under 3.3 70% IU L W ›
Final
0-6 · #366
84
4-2 · #28
120
TA&M -42.5 154.5 TA&M -41.4 MVSU +1.1 154.6 Over 0.1 100% TA&M W W ›
Final
0-4 · #306
84
2-4 · #164
68
SEMO -1.5 170.5 CP -2.0 CP +3.5 163.5 Under 7.0 57% CP L W ›
Final
0-6 · #353
66
6-0 · #54
98
MIZ -34.5 160.5 MIZ -29.8 SCST +4.7 156.2 Under 4.3 100% MIZ W L ›
Final
0-5 · #254
71
3-2 · #112
79
UNT -12.5 141.5 UNT -12.3 EWU +0.2 141.9 Over 0.4 86% UNT W W ›
Final
2-3 · #334
59
2-3 · #210
77
APSU -6.5 147.5 APSU -8.9 APSU +2.4 146.1 Under 1.4 78% APSU W W ›
Final
2-3 · #139
94
5-1 · #60
100
ASU -4.5 157.5 ASU -6.4 ASU +1.9 157.6 Over 0.1 71% ASU W W ›
Final
5-1 · #21
72
5-0 · #8
102
MICH -4.5 163.5 MICH -3.7 AUB +0.8 167.6 Over 4.1 63% MICH L W ›
Final
3-3 · #205
73
6-0 · #27
80
NEB -14.5 166.5 NEB -13.4 WIN +1.1 161.9 Under 4.6 88% NEB W W ›
Final
2-0 · #133
57
1-3 · #149
45
UCI -2.5 139.5 NMSU -2.4 NMSU +4.9 144.8 Over 5.3 58% NMSU W L ›
Final
1-3 · #192
77
2-4 · #296
64
GASO -3.5 160.5 UTSA -0.1 UTSA +3.6 159.0 Under 1.5 50% GASO W W ›
Final
1-5 · #204
95
2-3 · #273
87
MONT -4.5 162.5 OAK -0.1 OAK +4.6 164.3 Over 1.8 50% MONT W W ›
Final
1-2 · #274
68
2-4 · #268
63
PRST -1.5 146.5 PRST -1.7 PRST +0.2 153.2 Over 6.7 56% PRST W L ›
Final
5-1 · #50
61
6-0 · #17
100
GONZ -14.5 157.5 GONZ -14.4 MD +0.1 155.9 Under 1.6 90% GONZ L L ›
Final
5-0 · #46
69
5-0 · #43
74
IOWA -4.5 140.5 IOWA -4.8 IOWA +0.3 155.3 Over 14.8 66% IOWA W W ›
Final
5-1 · #26
72
5-1 · #92
80
UCLA -7.5 143.5 UCLA -8.4 UCLA +0.9 147.2 Over 3.7 77% UCLA L W ›
Final
2-2 · #75
97
4-1 · #57
80
ORE -2.5 141.5 ORE -4.0 ORE +1.5 146.3 Over 4.8 64% ORE L W ›
Final
3-3 · #98
76
3-2 · #15
115
ALA -13.5 181.5 ALA -16.9 ALA +3.4 179.2 Under 2.3 93% ALA W L ›
Final
5-1 · #73
58
3-2 · #80
68
GCU -5.5 153.5 GCU -0.0 UTAH +5.5 161.5 Over 8.0 50% GCU L L ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record