Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games105105 final · 0 to play
Lines moved801+ pt since the open · 104 with a line
Totals moved901+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS51-5349% covered
Upsets30outright
Over / Under63-4161% over
Model Favorite74-3170% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
IU vs LOUIU -5.5 → LOU -3.59 → LOU157.5 → 162.5▲ 5
LIN @ EIULIN -2.5 → LIN -8.56 → LIN143.5 → 145.5▲ 2
DEL @ DSUDEL -9.5 → DEL -7.52 → DSU140.5 → 129.5▼ 11
UNCA @ NCSUNCSU -23.5 → NCSU -28.55 → NCSU159.5 → 155.5▼ 4
RUTG @ MICHMICH -23.5 → MICH -25.52 → MICH144.5 → 153.5▲ 9
OMA @ PRSTPRST -9.5 → PRST -12.53 → PRST153.5 → 144.5▼ 9
CCU @ WINWIN -12.5 → WIN -16.54 → WIN150.5 → 153.5▲ 3
MOST @ TLSATLSA -11.5 → TLSA -7.54 → MOST138.5 → 142.5▲ 4
PAC @ CALCAL -11.5 → CAL -7.54 → PAC144.5 → 144.5no move
FSU vs HOUHOU -16.5 → HOU -12.54 → FSU146.5 → 148.5▲ 2
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference
8-0 · #13 AP #10
81
8-0 · #23 AP #1
58
Spread
PUR -4.5
✓ ISU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲4
▼ Under 139
Projected
77–81
✗ PUR lost
Model: ISU by 1.0 ✓ Model: Over 3.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
Duke
9-0 · #3 AP #4
66
8-0 · #10 AP #7
60
Spread
DUKE -1.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲3
▼ Under 126
Projected
72–70
✓ DUKE won
Model: DUKE by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 0.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-4 · #155
67
5-4 · #94
79
Spread
GT -10.5
✓ GT W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼1
▲ Over 146
Projected
69–76
✓ GT won
Model: MONM by 2.8 ✗ Model: Over 0.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #355
63
4-5 · #95
67
Spread
BC -17.5
✓ NHVN W ATS
Total
126.5
▲ Over 130
Projected
58–75
✓ BC won
Model: NHVN by 1.0 ✓ Model: Over 6.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
7-2 · #105
71
5-4 · #52
90
Spread
PROV -7.5
✓ PROV W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲1
▲ Over 161
Projected
78–85
✓ PROV won
Model: URI by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 2.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
7-2 · #91
73
7-1 · #20
86
Spread
UVA -5.5
✓ UVA W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲1
▲ Over 159
Projected
73–78
✓ UVA won
Model: DAY by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 3.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-3 · #224
64
7-2 · #25
88
Spread
MIA -19.5
✓ MIA W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼7
▲ Over 152
Projected
67–87
✓ MIA won
Model: MIA by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 8.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
UMBC
3-3 · #264
73
2-8 · #299
66
Spread
BUCK -1.5
✓ UMBC W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼5
▼ Under 139
Projected
73–75
✗ BUCK lost
Model: BUCK by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 4.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-6 · #234
77
6-1 · #104
86
Spread
RICH -12.5
✓ ODU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲6
▲ Over 163
Projected
70–82
✓ RICH won
Model: ODU by 0.4 ✓ Model: Under 1.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-3 · #150
82
5-2 · #200
71
Spread
UVU -1.5
✓ UVU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼1
▲ Over 153
Projected
73–73
✗ BGSU lost
Model: BGSU by 2.1 ✗ Model: Over 1.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-10 · #323
61
5-0 · #125
93
Spread
M-OH -17.5
✓ M-OH W ATS
Total
139.5 ▲1
▲ Over 154
Projected
64–77
✓ M-OH won
Model: ME by 5.3 ✗ Model: Over 1.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-4 · #271
63
5-3 · #48
75
Spread
NCSU -28.5
✓ UNCA W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼4
▼ Under 138
Projected
70–91
✓ NCSU won
Model: UNCA by 6.6 ✓ Model: Over 5.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-5 · #262
64
2-6 · #124
69
Spread
DREX -1.5
✓ LAS W ATS
Total
129.5 ▼3
▲ Over 133
Projected
65–71
✓ LAS won
Model: LAS by 8.1 ✓ Model: Over 6.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-4 · #187
83
SIUE
4-3 · #256
73
Spread
SIUE -5.5
✓ WMU W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼3
▲ Over 156
Projected
70–73
✗ SIUE lost
Model: WMU by 2.6 ✓ Model: Over 4.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-5 · #319
67
5-4 · #158
68
Spread
JMU -10.5
✓ NORF W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼2
▼ Under 135
Projected
68–73
✓ JMU won
Model: NORF by 5.3 ✓ Model: Over 3.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #206
72
0-7 · #351
75
Spread
DEL -7.5
✓ DSU W ATS
Total
129.5 ▼11
▲ Over 147
Projected
72–67
✗ DEL lost
Model: DSU by 2.7 ✓ Model: Over 9.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-4 · #283
88
5-4 · #205
84
Spread
WIN -16.5
✓ CCU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲3
▲ Over 172
Projected
70–85
✗ WIN lost
Model: CCU by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 1.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-5 · #296
88
0-9 · #348
84
Spread
GASO -10.5
✓ GWEB W ATS
Total
162.5 ▲3
▲ Over 172
Projected
85–77
✓ GASO won
Model: GWEB by 2.2 ✓ Model: Under 1.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-6 · #350
72
3-6 · #183
80
Spread
PRES -7.5
✓ PRES W ATS
Total
134.5 ▲5
▲ Over 152
Projected
62–71
✓ PRES won
Model: PRES by 1.2 ✓ Model: Under 0.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #215
67
3-5 · #325
78
Spread
UPST -2.5
✓ UPST W ATS
Total
149.5
▼ Under 145
Projected
75–79
✓ UPST won
Model: UPST by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 4.7 ✗
FinalConference
6-1 · #33
86
5-3 · #59
82
Spread
OSU -1.5
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲6
▲ Over 168
Projected
78–78
✓ OSU won
Model: NU by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 0.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-6 · #282
87
4-3 · #298
59
Spread
WGA -1.5
✓ TNTC W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼1
▼ Under 146
Projected
75–79
✗ WGA lost
Model: WGA by 2.8 ✗ Model: Over 3.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-7 · #303
51
5-3 · #79
82
Spread
SC -22.5
✓ SC W ATS
Total
142.5
▼ Under 133
Projected
62–86
✓ SC won
Model: SC by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 5.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-4 · #223
65
FIU
2-3 · #178
88
Spread
FIU -5.5
✓ FIU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲3
▲ Over 153
Projected
70–76
✓ FIU won
Model: FIU by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 1.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-7 · #364
60
4-4 · #153
78
Spread
AMER -10.5
✓ AMER W ATS
Total
130.5 ▲2
▲ Over 138
Projected
62–73
✓ AMER won
Model: AMER by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 4.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-4 · #42
76
6-2 · #41
96
Spread
WIS -11.5
✓ WIS W ATS
Total
160.5 ▲5
▲ Over 172
Projected
75–85
✓ WIS won
Model: MARQ by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-9 · #352
50
3-2 · #160
92
Spread
LIB -30.5
✓ LIB W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼1
▼ Under 142
Projected
61–86
✓ LIB won
Model: COPP by 5.6 ✗ Model: Over 3.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-2 · #86
77
7-1 · #72
68
Spread
BTLR -2.5
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼2
▼ Under 145
Projected
72–77
✗ BTLR lost
Model: BTLR by 2.7 ✗ Model: Over 0.9 ✗
FinalConference
4-4 · #265
78
2-7 · #340
55
Spread
YSU -6.5
✓ YSU W ATS
Total
171.5 ▼4
▼ Under 133
Projected
89–82
✓ YSU won
Model: YSU by 0.9 ✓ Model: Under 0.6 ✓
FinalConference
2-6 · #277
71
1-7 · #315
59
Spread
CLE -1.5
✓ DETM W ATS
Total
158.5 ▼3
▼ Under 130
Projected
81–82
✗ CLE lost
Model: DETM by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 4.1 ✗
FinalConference
5-2 · #230
77
1-6 · #249
79
Spread
PFW -1.5
✓ PFW W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼5
▲ Over 156
Projected
79–79
✗ NKU lost
Model: NKU by 1.6 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
7-1 · #142
77
7-0 · #237
69
Spread
SBU -5.5
✓ SBU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼1
▲ Over 146
Projected
76–70
✓ SBU won
Model: SBU by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-2 · #191
75
4-3 · #107
84
Spread
DUQ -9.5
✓ STBK W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲2
▲ Over 159
Projected
72–82
✓ DUQ won
Model: DUQ by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 3.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-6 · #317
70
3-3 · #100
69
Spread
FOR -10.5
✓ HC W ATS
Total
138.5
▲ Over 139
Projected
66–75
✗ FOR lost
Model: HC by 1.4 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-5 · #136
69
3-4 · #152
79
Spread
FUR -4.5
✓ FUR W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼1
▲ Over 148
Projected
69–72
✓ FUR won
Model: HARV by 1.2 ✗ Model: Under 0.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
7-1 · #38 AP #22
78
7-1 · #14 AP #6
87
Spread
LOU -3.5
✓ LOU W ATS
Total
162.5 ▲5
▲ Over 165
Projected
77–82
✓ LOU won
Model: LOU by 1.0 ✓ Model: Under 3.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-8 · #135
68
2-7 · #113
73
Spread
LUC -6.5
✓ PRIN W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼1
▲ Over 141
Projected
68–72
✓ LUC won
Model: PRIN by 2.7 ✓ Model: Over 3.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-8 · #208
69
4-2 · #148
92
Spread
KENN -14.5
✓ KENN W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲3
▲ Over 161
Projected
75–88
✓ KENN won
Model: GAST by 1.3 ✗ Model: Over 4.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-3 · #247
84
3-4 · #201
81
Spread
SDST -5.5
✓ IDHO W ATS
Total
147.5
▲ Over 165
Projected
71–76
✗ SDST lost
Model: IDHO by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 0.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-3 · #157
97
3-5 · #204
98
Spread
OAK -4.5
✓ TOL W ATS
Total
166.5 ▲2
▲ Over 195
Projected
80–87
✓ OAK won
Model: OAK by 2.4 ✗ Model: Under 0.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #250
74
5-1 · #108
98
Spread
TLSA -7.5
✓ TLSA W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲4
▲ Over 172
Projected
65–79
✓ TLSA won
Model: TLSA by 6.8 ✓ Model: Over 1.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #295
68
6-3 · #132
81
Spread
MUR -16.5
✓ BELL W ATS
Total
157.5 ▼4
▼ Under 149
Projected
74–88
✓ MUR won
Model: BELL by 2.2 ✓ Model: Over 5.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
8-0 · #93
62
7-2 · #68
73
Spread
VT -4.5
✓ VT W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲1
▼ Under 135
Projected
74–76
✓ VT won
Model: GMU by 2.3 ✗ Model: Over 5.8 ✗
FinalConference
5-4 · #62
60
7-0 · #8 AP #3
101
Spread
MICH -25.5
✓ MICH W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲9
▲ Over 161
Projected
61–90
✓ MICH won
Model: MICH by 3.6 ✓ Model: Under 2.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
5-3 · #174
58
6-2 · #18 AP #25
82
Spread
ARK -19.5
✓ ARK W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲7
▼ Under 140
Projected
68–90
✓ ARK won
Model: ARK by 2.7 ✓ Model: Under 3.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #275
69
0-7 · #357
54
Spread
NCAT -2.5
✓ NCAT W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼3
▼ Under 123
Projected
74–73
✓ NCAT won
Model: NCCU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 4.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
Elon
3-4 · #232
73
5-3 · #248
52
Spread
WOF -4.5
✓ ELON W ATS
Total
161.5
▼ Under 125
Projected
79–83
✗ WOF lost
Model: ELON by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
5-3 · #231
81
Ohio
2-6 · #128
88
Spread
OHIO -3.5
✓ OHIO W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲1
▲ Over 169
Projected
78–82
✓ OHIO won
Model: OHIO by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-6 · #307
60
5-3 · #209
80
Spread
MASS -11.5
✓ MASS W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲1
▼ Under 140
Projected
75–84
✓ MASS won
Model: UML by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✗
FinalConference
6-3 · #50
64
Iowa
7-1 · #43
83
Spread
IOWA -10.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
137.5 ▼1
▲ Over 147
Projected
69–80
✓ IOWA won
Model: IOWA by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 11.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #251
80
5-2 · #122
93
Spread
WYO -14.5
✓ DART W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲5
▲ Over 173
Projected
70–84
✓ WYO won
Model: DART by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 3.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
7-1 · #120
70
1-8 · #221
63
Spread
UNCW -12.5
✓ UL W ATS
Total
130.5
▲ Over 133
Projected
73–60
✓ UNCW won
Model: UNCW by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 3.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-1 · #133
69
3-3 · #253
77
Spread
NMSU -1.5
✓ ACU W ATS
Total
131.5 ▲1
▲ Over 146
Projected
70–64
✗ NMSU lost
Model: NMSU by 4.9 ✗ Model: Over 2.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-5 · #255
79
4-2 · #129
80
Spread
WKU -11.5
✓ EVAN W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲1
▲ Over 159
Projected
69–81
✓ WKU won
Model: WKU by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 2.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-8 · #284
82
2-5 · #145
78
Spread
ECU -7.5
✓ UNCG W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼7
▲ Over 160
Projected
71–77
✗ ECU lost
Model: UNCG by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 8.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-5 · #332
78
1-6 · #272
63
Spread
LEM -2.5
✓ LEM W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼7
▼ Under 141
Projected
77–77
✗ BING lost
Model: BING by 2.7 ✗ Model: Over 9.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
6-2 · #118
88
6-2 · #130
71
Spread
AKR -6.5
✓ AKR W ATS
Total
162.5 ▼5
▼ Under 159
Projected
87–80
✓ AKR won
Model: AKR by 1.0 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
8-1 · #67
78
5-3 · #83
67
Spread
KSU -2.5
✓ HALL W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼2
▼ Under 145
Projected
73–76
✗ KSU lost
Model: KSU by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 0.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-5 · #218
84
0-6 · #345
80
Spread
LONG -5.5
✓ MORG W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲2
▲ Over 164
Projected
83–77
✓ LONG won
Model: LONG by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 5.6 ✓
FinalConference
2-3 · #289
67
0-7 · #285
74
Spread
UIW -1.5
✓ NICH W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼4
▼ Under 141
Projected
74–75
✓ NICH won
Model: NICH by 2.0 ✓ Model: Over 3.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-3 · #114
70
4-4 · #111
69
Spread
TEM -1.5
✓ JOES W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼6
▼ Under 139
Projected
78–79
✗ TEM lost
Model: JOES by 0.1 ✓ Model: Over 8.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-6 · #306
74
2-4 · #227
70
Spread
UTC -3.5
✓ SEMO W ATS
Total
149.5
▼ Under 144
Projected
75–79
✗ UTC lost
Model: UTC by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 4.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
6-1 · #29
71
3-4 · #76
78
Spread
BAY -3.5
✓ MEM W ATS
Total
158.5
▼ Under 149
Projected
84–79
✗ BAY lost
Model: BAY by 1.9 ✗ Model: Over 3.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-7 · #279
60
3-2 · #274
55
Spread
PRST -12.5
✓ OMA W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼9
▼ Under 115
Projected
74–81
✗ PRST lost
Model: OMA by 5.8 ✓ Model: Over 9.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-5 · #186
65
1-6 · #172
56
Spread
UVM -1.5
✓ UVM W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼5
▼ Under 121
Projected
76–74
✓ UVM won
Model: UVM by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 7.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-6 · #267
70
4-5 · #99
81
Spread
ORST -10.5
✓ ORST W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲2
▲ Over 151
Projected
68–81
✓ ORST won
Model: ORST by 1.9 ✓ Model: Over 2.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-7 · #335
66
0-7 · #254
90
Spread
EWU -9.5
✓ EWU W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲1
▲ Over 156
Projected
74–80
✓ EWU won
Model: KC by 2.8 ✗ Model: Over 2.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-3 · #189
82
0-5 · #322
70
Spread
SHSU -7.5
✓ SHSU W ATS
Total
158.5 ▼1
▼ Under 152
Projected
86–78
✓ SHSU won
Model: SHSU by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
8-0 · #65
86
6-2 · #87
91
Spread
CSU -1.5
✓ CSU W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼3
▲ Over 177
Projected
78–78
✓ CSU won
Model: COLO by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 6.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
6-2 · #163
61
7-1 · #92
67
Spread
CAL -7.5
✓ PAC W ATS
Total
144.5
▼ Under 128
Projected
69–80
✓ CAL won
Model: CAL by 3.6 ✗ Model: Over 4.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-4 · #324
87
2-7 · #216
82
Spread
LIU -1.5
✓ LIU W ATS
Total
142.5
▲ Over 169
Projected
73–75
✗ LEH lost
Model: LEH by 3.1 ✗ Model: Over 5.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-6 · #301
65
7-1 · #170
93
Spread
COLU -13.5
✓ COLU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼3
▲ Over 158
Projected
67–82
✓ COLU won
Model: COLU by 1.4 ✓ Model: Over 4.3 ✓
FinalConference
5-3 · #56
84
USC
8-0 · #36 AP #24
76
Spread
USC -4.5
✓ WASH W ATS
Total
154.5
▲ Over 160
Projected
80–85
✗ USC lost
Model: USC by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 10.1 ✓
FinalConference
4-4 · #57
63
UCLA
6-2 · #26
74
Spread
UCLA -8.5
✓ UCLA W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲4
▼ Under 137
Projected
67–78
✓ UCLA won
Model: UCLA by 1.8 ✓ Model: Under 1.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-5 · #263
79
3-4 · #344
93
Spread
IDST -8.5
✓ IDST W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼6
▲ Over 172
Projected
70–79
✓ IDST won
Model: IDST by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 5.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
6-3 · #89
75
7-2 · #47
66
Spread
WVU -2.5
✓ WAKE W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲4
▼ Under 141
Projected
71–71
✓ WAKE won
Model: WAKE by 2.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
6-2 · #217
86
7-2 · #101
99
Spread
GW -13.5
✓ W&M W ATS
Total
174.5 ▲6
▲ Over 185
Projected
78–90
✓ GW won
Model: W&M by 2.4 ✓ Model: Under 6.7 ✗
FinalConference
2-4 · #300
85
2-6 · #276
76
Spread
NOLA -4.5
✓ HCU W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼1
▲ Over 161
Projected
70–75
✗ NOLA lost
Model: NOLA by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 4.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-5 · #261
82
0-7 · #286
88
Spread
BU -5.5
✓ UNH W ATS
Total
134.5 ▼6
▲ Over 170
Projected
72–66
✗ BU lost
Model: BU by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 3.9 ✓
FinalConference
0-5 · #238
57
3-2 · #293
49
Spread
LAM -3.5
✓ AMCC W ATS
Total
136.5 ▲4
▼ Under 106
Projected
66–69
✗ LAM lost
Model: AMCC by 0.3 ✓ Model: Under 1.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
7-2 · #203
85
Utah
6-3 · #73
91
Spread
UTAH -5.5
✓ UTAH W ATS
Total
145.5
▲ Over 176
Projected
72–78
✓ UTAH won
Model: UTAH by 0.2 ✓ Model: Over 4.4 ✓
FinalConference
3-5 · #281
88
3-5 · #164
84
Spread
CP -5.5
✓ UCR W ATS
Total
162.5 ▼1
▲ Over 172
Projected
79–82
✗ CP lost
Model: UCR by 2.2 ✓ Model: Under 1.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
Penn
4-3 · #137
63
6-1 · #32
90
Spread
VILL -18.5
✓ VILL W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲2
▲ Over 153
Projected
64–85
✓ VILL won
Model: VILL by 3.4 ✓ Model: Under 1.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
8-0 · #45
84
5-3 · #80
78
Spread
OKST -1.5
✓ OKST W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲2
▲ Over 162
Projected
82–75
✓ OKST won
Model: OKST by 6.0 ✓ Model: Over 1.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-3 · #81
67
7-1 · #2 AP #8
82
Spread
HOU -12.5
✓ HOU W ATS
Total
148.5 ▲2
▲ Over 149
Projected
66–79
✓ HOU won
Model: HOU by 0.8 ✓ Model: Under 3.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
6-2 · #4 AP #14
75
7-2 · #7 AP #13
62
Spread
TENN -1.5
✓ ILL W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼1
▼ Under 137
Projected
79–77
✓ ILL won
Model: ILL by 3.2 ✓ Model: Over 7.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
5-3 · #46
58
4-3 · #9 AP #23
63
Spread
SJU -13.5
✓ MISS W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼3
▼ Under 121
Projected
69–87
✓ SJU won
Model: SJU by 4.4 ✗ Model: Over 4.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-5 · #273
79
2-7 · #336
75
Spread
MONT -5.5
✓ UND W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼4
▼ Under 154
Projected
81–76
✓ MONT won
Model: UND by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 2.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #321
68
4-3 · #213
69
Spread
NDSU -12.5
✓ NAU W ATS
Total
147.5 ▲2
▼ Under 137
Projected
69–79
✓ NDSU won
Model: NAU by 2.1 ✓ Model: Over 0.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-5 · #162
68
1-7 · #305
72
Spread
MTST -6.5
✓ ORU W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼1
▼ Under 140
Projected
80–73
✗ MTST lost
Model: MTST by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 2.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-5 · #334
55
5-4 · #167
84
Spread
BRAD -18.5
✓ BRAD W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲2
▼ Under 139
Projected
65–83
✓ BRAD won
Model: NIU by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 1.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-4 · #77
74
6-1 · #131
69
Spread
UNI -1.5
✓ WICH W ATS
Total
135.5 ▲4
▲ Over 143
Projected
66–68
✗ UNI lost
Model: WICH by 0.3 ✓ Model: Under 1.8 ✗
FinalConference
5-3 · #168
72
2-5 · #235
74
Spread
MILW -4.5
✓ RMU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲4
▼ Under 146
Projected
77–80
✓ MILW won
Model: RMU by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-8 · #362
53
6-2 · #116
95
Spread
ILST -20.5
✓ ILST W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼3
▲ Over 148
Projected
64–84
✓ ILST won
Model: CHST by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 3.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
4-4 · #291
87
5-1 · #219
89
Spread
UNCO -8.5
✓ SDAK W ATS
Total
162.5 ▲1
▲ Over 176
Projected
80–87
✓ UNCO won
Model: SDAK by 1.0 ✓ Model: Over 4.2 ✓
FinalConference
3-4 · #258
82
1-5 · #361
74
Spread
LIN -8.5
✓ EIU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲2
▲ Over 156
Projected
74–71
✓ LIN won
Model: EIU by 5.9 ✓ Model: Under 0.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-8 · #363
72
5-3 · #66
76
Spread
DEP -23.5
✓ UAPB W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲3
▼ Under 148
Projected
67–90
✓ DEP won
Model: UAPB by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 0.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
7-1 · #106
71
5-2 · #82
98
Spread
UNM -1.5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
153.5
▲ Over 169
Projected
78–77
✗ SCU lost
Model: SCU by 3.2 ✗ Model: Over 1.3 ✓
FinalConference
3-5 · #329
84
5-2 · #134
109
Spread
UCSB -12.5
✓ UCSB W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼1
▲ Over 193
Projected
71–81
✓ UCSB won
Model: CSUB by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 6.2 ✓
FinalConference
6-1 · #123
80
1-7 · #297
74
Spread
UCSD -8.5
✓ LBSU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼3
▲ Over 154
Projected
81–68
✓ UCSD won
Model: UCSD by 3.8 ✗ Model: Over 3.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-3 · #171
90
1-6 · #222
78
Spread
ARST -9.5
✓ ARST W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼1
▲ Over 168
Projected
80–71
✓ ARST won
Model: ARST by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 3.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
7-2 · #21 AP #20
68
7-0 · #5 AP #2
97
Spread
ARIZ -11.5
✓ ARIZ W ATS
Total
162.5 ▲1
▲ Over 165
Projected
80–85
✓ ARIZ won
Model: AUB by 6.3 ✗ Model: Over 3.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
6-2 · #31
70
6-2 · #60
86
Spread
OU -5.5
✓ ASU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▼1
▼ Under 156
Projected
83–78
✗ OU lost
Model: ASU by 0.1 ✓ Model: Over 2.8 ✗
FinalConference
3-4 · #194
71
4-4 · #149
85
Spread
UCI -7.5
✓ UCI W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲5
▲ Over 156
Projected
69–79
✓ UCI won
Model: UCI by 3.1 ✓ Model: Under 5.0 ✗
FinalConference
2-6 · #312
59
6-2 · #140
69
Spread
—
 
Total
—
model 157.9
Projected
71–87
✓ HAW won
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
8-0 · #13
81
8-0 · #23
58
PUR -4.5 154.5 PUR -3.5 ISU +1.0 158.1 Over 3.6 62% PUR W L ›
Final
9-0 · #3
66
8-0 · #10
60
DUKE -1.5 141.5 DUKE -2.1 DUKE +0.6 141.8 Over 0.3 57% DUKE W L ›
Final
4-4 · #155
67
5-4 · #94
79
GT -10.5 144.5 GT -7.8 MONM +2.8 145.1 Over 0.6 75% GT L W ›
Final
2-4 · #355
63
4-5 · #95
67
BC -17.5 126.5 BC -16.5 NHVN +1.0 133.1 Over 6.6 93% BC W W ›
Final
7-2 · #105
71
5-4 · #52
90
PROV -7.5 159.5 PROV -7.4 URI +0.1 162.3 Over 2.8 74% PROV L W ›
Final
7-2 · #91
73
7-1 · #20
86
UVA -5.5 147.5 UVA -4.6 DAY +0.9 150.5 Over 3.0 66% UVA L W ›
Final
3-3 · #224
64
7-2 · #25
88
MIA -19.5 145.5 MIA -20.4 MIA +0.9 153.9 Over 8.4 96% MIA W W ›
Final
3-3 · #264
73
2-8 · #299
66
BUCK -1.5 143.5 BUCK -2.0 BUCK +0.5 148.1 Over 4.6 57% BUCK L L ›
Final
2-6 · #234
77
6-1 · #104
86
RICH -12.5 153.5 RICH -12.1 ODU +0.4 152.4 Under 1.1 85% RICH W L ›
Final
3-3 · #150
82
5-2 · #200
71
UVU -1.5 144.5 BGSU -0.6 BGSU +2.1 146.3 Over 1.8 52% BGSU L W ›
Final
0-10 · #323
61
5-0 · #125
93
M-OH -17.5 139.5 M-OH -12.2 ME +5.3 140.9 Over 1.4 86% M-OH L W ›
Final
3-4 · #271
63
5-3 · #48
75
NCSU -28.5 155.5 NCSU -21.9 UNCA +6.6 160.8 Over 5.3 97% NCSU W L ›
Final
3-5 · #262
64
2-6 · #124
69
DREX -1.5 129.5 LAS -6.6 LAS +8.1 135.7 Over 6.2 72% LAS W W ›
Final
4-4 · #187
83
4-3 · #256
73
SIUE -5.5 139.5 SIUE -2.9 WMU +2.6 143.7 Over 4.2 60% SIUE W W ›
Final
1-5 · #319
67
5-4 · #158
68
JMU -10.5 138.5 JMU -5.3 NORF +5.3 141.5 Over 3.0 68% JMU W L ›
Final
2-4 · #206
72
0-7 · #351
75
DEL -7.5 129.5 DEL -4.8 DSU +2.7 138.7 Over 9.2 66% DEL W W ›
Final
4-4 · #283
88
5-4 · #205
84
WIN -16.5 153.5 WIN -14.2 CCU +2.3 154.9 Over 1.4 89% WIN W W ›
Final
4-5 · #296
88
0-9 · #348
84
GASO -10.5 162.5 GASO -8.3 GWEB +2.2 161.2 Under 1.3 77% GASO W L ›
Final
1-6 · #350
72
3-6 · #183
80
PRES -7.5 134.5 PRES -8.7 PRES +1.2 133.6 Under 0.9 78% PRES W L ›
Final
2-4 · #215
67
3-5 · #325
78
UPST -2.5 149.5 UPST -3.3 UPST +0.8 154.2 Over 4.7 61% UPST W L ›
Final
6-1 · #33
86
5-3 · #59
82
OSU -1.5 155.5 OSU -0.5 NU +1.0 156.3 Over 0.8 52% OSU L W ›
Final
1-6 · #282
87
4-3 · #298
59
WGA -1.5 150.5 WGA -4.3 WGA +2.8 153.7 Over 3.2 64% WGA L L ›
Final
2-7 · #303
51
5-3 · #79
82
SC -22.5 142.5 SC -24.0 SC +1.5 147.7 Over 5.2 98% SC W L ›
Final
3-4 · #223
65
2-3 · #178
88
FIU -5.5 145.5 FIU -6.1 FIU +0.6 146.7 Over 1.2 70% FIU W W ›
Final
2-7 · #364
60
4-4 · #153
78
AMER -10.5 130.5 AMER -11.4 AMER +0.9 135.1 Over 4.6 84% AMER W W ›
Final
5-4 · #42
76
6-2 · #41
96
WIS -11.5 160.5 WIS -10.0 MARQ +1.5 160.2 Under 0.3 81% WIS L L ›
Final
1-9 · #352
50
3-2 · #160
92
LIB -30.5 143.5 LIB -24.9 COPP +5.6 147.1 Over 3.6 99% LIB L L ›
Final
4-2 · #86
77
7-1 · #72
68
BTLR -2.5 148.5 BTLR -5.2 BTLR +2.7 149.4 Over 0.9 67% BTLR L L ›
Final
4-4 · #265
78
2-7 · #340
55
YSU -6.5 171.5 YSU -7.4 YSU +0.9 170.9 Under 0.6 74% YSU W W ›
Final
2-6 · #277
71
1-7 · #315
59
CLE -1.5 158.5 CLE -0.9 DETM +0.6 162.6 Over 4.1 53% CLE W L ›
Final
5-2 · #230
77
1-6 · #249
79
PFW -1.5 153.5 NKU -0.1 NKU +1.6 158.0 Over 4.5 51% NKU L W ›
Final
7-1 · #142
77
7-0 · #237
69
SBU -5.5 144.5 SBU -5.8 SBU +0.3 145.8 Over 1.3 69% SBU W W ›
Final
4-2 · #191
75
4-3 · #107
84
DUQ -9.5 150.5 DUQ -9.7 DUQ +0.2 153.5 Over 3.0 80% DUQ L W ›
Final
2-6 · #317
70
3-3 · #100
69
FOR -10.5 138.5 FOR -9.1 HC +1.4 140.0 Over 1.5 79% FOR W W ›
Final
4-5 · #136
69
3-4 · #152
79
FUR -4.5 141.5 FUR -3.3 HARV +1.2 141.2 Under 0.3 61% FUR L L ›
Final
7-1 · #38
78
7-1 · #14
87
LOU -3.5 162.5 LOU -4.5 LOU +1.0 159.3 Under 3.2 65% LOU W L ›
Final
2-8 · #135
68
2-7 · #113
73
LUC -6.5 136.5 LUC -3.8 PRIN +2.7 139.9 Over 3.4 63% LUC W W ›
Final
0-8 · #208
69
4-2 · #148
92
KENN -14.5 158.5 KENN -13.3 GAST +1.3 162.7 Over 4.2 88% KENN L W ›
Final
3-3 · #247
84
3-4 · #201
81
SDST -5.5 147.5 SDST -5.0 IDHO +0.5 147.3 Under 0.2 67% SDST W L ›
Final
4-3 · #157
97
3-5 · #204
98
OAK -4.5 166.5 OAK -6.9 OAK +2.4 166.3 Under 0.2 73% OAK L L ›
Final
1-3 · #250
74
5-1 · #108
98
TLSA -7.5 142.5 TLSA -14.3 TLSA +6.8 143.9 Over 1.4 89% TLSA W W ›
Final
2-4 · #295
68
6-3 · #132
81
MUR -16.5 157.5 MUR -14.3 BELL +2.2 162.6 Over 5.1 89% MUR W L ›
Final
8-0 · #93
62
7-2 · #68
73
VT -4.5 144.5 VT -2.2 GMU +2.3 150.3 Over 5.8 58% VT L L ›
Final
5-4 · #62
60
7-0 · #8
101
MICH -25.5 153.5 MICH -29.1 MICH +3.6 151.5 Under 2.0 99% MICH W L ›
Final
5-3 · #174
58
6-2 · #18
82
ARK -19.5 161.5 ARK -22.2 ARK +2.7 158.0 Under 3.5 97% ARK W W ›
Final
2-3 · #275
69
0-7 · #357
54
NCAT -2.5 142.5 NCAT -1.0 NCCU +1.5 147.0 Over 4.5 53% NCAT L L ›
Final
3-4 · #232
73
5-3 · #248
52
WOF -4.5 161.5 WOF -4.2 ELON +0.3 162.3 Over 0.8 64% WOF W L ›
Final
5-3 · #231
81
2-6 · #128
88
OHIO -3.5 157.5 OHIO -4.0 OHIO +0.5 159.0 Over 1.5 64% OHIO W W ›
Final
1-6 · #307
60
5-3 · #209
80
MASS -11.5 155.5 MASS -9.0 UML +2.5 159.0 Over 3.5 78% MASS L L ›
Final
6-3 · #50
64
7-1 · #43
83
IOWA -10.5 137.5 IOWA -10.9 IOWA +0.4 149.0 Over 11.5 83% IOWA W W ›
Final
2-3 · #251
80
5-2 · #122
93
WYO -14.5 156.5 WYO -14.0 DART +0.5 152.9 Under 3.6 89% WYO W L ›
Final
7-1 · #120
70
1-8 · #221
63
UNCW -12.5 130.5 UNCW -12.9 UNCW +0.4 133.6 Over 3.1 87% UNCW L W ›
Final
4-1 · #133
69
3-3 · #253
77
NMSU -1.5 131.5 NMSU -6.4 NMSU +4.9 134.2 Over 2.7 71% NMSU L W ›
Final
2-5 · #255
79
4-2 · #129
80
WKU -11.5 147.5 WKU -12.3 WKU +0.8 150.3 Over 2.8 86% WKU L W ›
Final
1-8 · #284
82
2-5 · #145
78
ECU -7.5 139.5 ECU -5.7 UNCG +1.8 147.9 Over 8.4 69% ECU W W ›
Final
3-5 · #332
78
1-6 · #272
63
LEM -2.5 144.5 BING -0.2 BING +2.7 153.9 Over 9.4 51% BING L L ›
Final
6-2 · #118
88
6-2 · #130
71
AKR -6.5 162.5 AKR -7.5 AKR +1.0 167.0 Over 4.5 75% AKR W L ›
Final
8-1 · #67
78
5-3 · #83
67
KSU -2.5 148.5 KSU -3.4 KSU +0.9 148.6 Over 0.1 62% KSU L L ›
Final
3-5 · #218
84
0-6 · #345
80
LONG -5.5 154.5 LONG -5.9 LONG +0.4 160.1 Over 5.6 70% LONG L W ›
Final
2-3 · #289
67
0-7 · #285
74
UIW -1.5 145.5 NICH -0.5 NICH +2.0 148.8 Over 3.3 52% NICH W L ›
Final
3-3 · #114
70
4-4 · #111
69
TEM -1.5 147.5 TEM -1.4 JOES +0.1 156.3 Over 8.8 55% TEM W L ›
Final
1-6 · #306
74
2-4 · #227
70
UTC -3.5 149.5 UTC -3.8 UTC +0.3 153.7 Over 4.2 63% UTC L L ›
Final
6-1 · #29
71
3-4 · #76
78
BAY -3.5 158.5 BAY -5.4 BAY +1.9 162.3 Over 3.8 68% BAY L L ›
Final
1-7 · #279
60
3-2 · #274
55
PRST -12.5 144.5 PRST -6.7 OMA +5.8 154.2 Over 9.7 72% PRST W L ›
Final
3-5 · #186
65
1-6 · #172
56
UVM -1.5 142.5 UVM -2.4 UVM +0.9 150.2 Over 7.7 58% UVM W L ›
Final
1-6 · #267
70
4-5 · #99
81
ORST -10.5 146.5 ORST -12.4 ORST +1.9 148.6 Over 2.1 86% ORST W W ›
Final
0-7 · #335
66
0-7 · #254
90
EWU -9.5 151.5 EWU -6.7 KC +2.8 154.0 Over 2.5 72% EWU L W ›
Final
3-3 · #189
82
0-5 · #322
70
SHSU -7.5 158.5 SHSU -7.9 SHSU +0.4 163.0 Over 4.5 75% SHSU W L ›
Final
8-0 · #65
86
6-2 · #87
91
CSU -1.5 149.5 CSU -0.6 COLO +0.9 156.2 Over 6.7 52% CSU L W ›
Final
6-2 · #163
61
7-1 · #92
67
CAL -7.5 144.5 CAL -11.1 CAL +3.6 148.5 Over 4.0 83% CAL L L ›
Final
4-4 · #324
87
2-7 · #216
82
LIU -1.5 142.5 LEH -1.6 LEH +3.1 148.3 Over 5.8 56% LEH L W ›
Final
0-6 · #301
65
7-1 · #170
93
COLU -13.5 144.5 COLU -14.9 COLU +1.4 148.8 Over 4.3 90% COLU W W ›
Final
5-3 · #56
84
8-0 · #36
76
USC -4.5 154.5 USC -5.3 USC +0.8 164.6 Over 10.1 68% USC L W ›
Final
4-4 · #57
63
6-2 · #26
74
UCLA -8.5 146.5 UCLA -10.3 UCLA +1.8 144.9 Under 1.6 82% UCLA W W ›
Final
3-5 · #263
79
3-4 · #344
93
IDST -8.5 142.5 IDST -9.0 IDST +0.5 148.3 Over 5.8 78% IDST W W ›
Final
6-3 · #89
75
7-2 · #47
66
WVU -2.5 143.5 WAKE -0.0 WAKE +2.5 142.1 Under 1.4 50% WVU W W ›
Final
6-2 · #217
86
7-2 · #101
99
GW -13.5 174.5 GW -11.1 W&M +2.4 167.8 Under 6.7 83% GW W L ›
Final
2-4 · #300
85
2-6 · #276
76
NOLA -4.5 140.5 NOLA -5.5 NOLA +1.0 145.4 Over 4.9 68% NOLA L W ›
Final
3-5 · #261
82
0-7 · #286
88
BU -5.5 134.5 BU -6.4 BU +0.9 138.4 Over 3.9 71% BU L W ›
Final
0-5 · #238
57
3-2 · #293
49
LAM -3.5 136.5 LAM -3.2 AMCC +0.3 135.2 Under 1.3 61% LAM W W ›
Final
7-2 · #203
85
6-3 · #73
91
UTAH -5.5 145.5 UTAH -5.7 UTAH +0.2 149.9 Over 4.4 69% UTAH W W ›
Final
3-5 · #281
88
3-5 · #164
84
CP -5.5 162.5 CP -3.3 UCR +2.2 160.7 Under 1.8 61% CP W L ›
Final
4-3 · #137
63
6-1 · #32
90
VILL -18.5 150.5 VILL -21.9 VILL +3.4 148.8 Under 1.7 97% VILL W L ›
Final
8-0 · #45
84
5-3 · #80
78
OKST -1.5 155.5 OKST -7.5 OKST +6.0 157.2 Over 1.7 74% OKST W W ›
Final
5-3 · #81
67
7-1 · #2
82
HOU -12.5 148.5 HOU -13.3 HOU +0.8 145.5 Under 3.0 88% HOU W L ›
Final
6-2 · #4
75
7-2 · #7
62
TENN -1.5 149.5 ILL -1.7 ILL +3.2 156.5 Over 7.0 56% ILL W L ›
Final
5-3 · #46
58
4-3 · #9
63
SJU -13.5 151.5 SJU -17.9 SJU +4.4 155.9 Over 4.4 94% SJU L L ›
Final
2-5 · #273
79
2-7 · #336
75
MONT -5.5 154.5 MONT -4.4 UND +1.1 156.9 Over 2.4 65% MONT W L ›
Final
2-3 · #321
68
4-3 · #213
69
NDSU -12.5 147.5 NDSU -10.4 NAU +2.1 147.6 Over 0.1 82% NDSU W L ›
Final
2-5 · #162
68
1-7 · #305
72
MTST -6.5 150.5 MTST -6.8 MTST +0.3 153.3 Over 2.8 72% MTST L L ›
Final
2-5 · #334
55
5-4 · #167
84
BRAD -18.5 146.5 BRAD -17.3 NIU +1.2 147.6 Over 1.1 93% BRAD L L ›
Final
4-4 · #77
74
6-1 · #131
69
UNI -1.5 135.5 UNI -1.2 WICH +0.3 133.8 Under 1.8 54% UNI W L ›
Final
5-3 · #168
72
2-5 · #235
74
MILW -4.5 153.5 MILW -3.0 RMU +1.5 157.5 Over 4.0 61% MILW W L ›
Final
0-8 · #362
53
6-2 · #116
95
ILST -20.5 144.5 ILST -19.6 CHST +0.9 147.8 Over 3.3 96% ILST L W ›
Final
4-4 · #291
87
5-1 · #219
89
UNCO -8.5 162.5 UNCO -7.5 SDAK +1.0 166.7 Over 4.2 74% UNCO W W ›
Final
3-4 · #258
82
1-5 · #361
74
LIN -8.5 145.5 LIN -2.6 EIU +5.9 144.8 Under 0.7 59% LIN W L ›
Final
1-8 · #363
72
5-3 · #66
76
DEP -23.5 156.5 DEP -22.4 UAPB +1.1 156.6 Over 0.1 98% DEP W L ›
Final
7-1 · #106
71
5-2 · #82
98
UNM -1.5 153.5 SCU -1.7 SCU +3.2 154.8 Over 1.3 56% SCU L W ›
Final
3-5 · #329
84
5-2 · #134
109
UCSB -12.5 145.5 UCSB -10.1 CSUB +2.4 151.7 Over 6.2 81% UCSB L W ›
Final
6-1 · #123
80
1-7 · #297
74
UCSD -8.5 145.5 UCSD -12.3 UCSD +3.8 148.8 Over 3.3 86% UCSD L W ›
Final
5-3 · #171
90
1-6 · #222
78
ARST -9.5 147.5 ARST -9.9 ARST +0.4 150.8 Over 3.3 81% ARST W W ›
Final
7-2 · #21
68
7-0 · #5
97
ARIZ -11.5 162.5 ARIZ -5.2 AUB +6.3 165.5 Over 3.0 67% ARIZ L W ›
Final
6-2 · #31
70
6-2 · #60
86
OU -5.5 157.5 OU -5.4 ASU +0.1 160.3 Over 2.8 68% OU W L ›
Final
3-4 · #194
71
4-4 · #149
85
UCI -7.5 152.5 UCI -10.6 UCI +3.1 147.5 Under 5.0 82% UCI W L ›
Final
2-6 · #312
59
6-2 · #140
69
— — HAW -16.4 — 157.9 — 92% HAW ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record