Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games3333 final · 0 to play
Lines moved251+ pt since the open · 33 with a line
Totals moved291+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS15-1845% covered
Upsets6outright
Over / Under20-1361% over
Model Favorite27-682% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
HPU vs UICUIC -7.5 → HPU -10.518 → HPU154.5 → 158.5▲ 4
NE @ PRINPRIN -3.5 → PRIN -2.51 → NE154.5 → 145.5▼ 9
SDAK @ MIZMIZ -28.5 → MIZ -24.54 → SDAK172.5 → 171.5▼ 1
WAKE vs TTUTTU -5.5 → TTU -9.54 → TTU155.5 → 160.5▲ 5
ASU @ HAWHAW -1.5 → HAW -1.5no move151.5 → 143.5▼ 8
CHST @ IOWAIOWA -32.5 → IOWA -31.51 → CHST149.5 → 142.5▼ 7
LIU @ FORFOR -3.5 → FOR -4.51 → FOR152.5 → 145.5▼ 7
LIN @ IUIU -35.5 → IU -32.53 → LIN160.5 → 155.5▼ 5
PITT vs UCFUCF -1.5 → PITT -1.53 → PITT155.5 → 149.5▼ 6
TNST @ TENNTENN -31.5 → TENN -31.5no move151.5 → 157.5▲ 6
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
0-2 · #289
87
Spread
UIW -9.5
✓ USI W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼5
▲ Over 168
Projected
68–77
✓ UIW won
Model: UIW by 0.2 ✗ Model: Under 0.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-1 · #90
90
UIC
2-1 · #110
80
Spread
HPU -10.5
✓ UIC W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲4
▲ Over 170
Projected
83–75
✓ HPU won
Model: UIC by 2.9 ✓ Model: Under 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-6 · #363
70
3-1 · #231
98
Spread
MRSH -20.5
✓ MRSH W ATS
Total
164.5 ▼1
▲ Over 168
Projected
73–90
✓ MRSH won
Model: UAPB by 3.6 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-2 · #76
71
4-0 · #23 AP #1
80
Spread
PUR -14.5
✓ MEM W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼3
▼ Under 151
Projected
69–89
✓ PUR won
Model: PUR by 4.9 ✗ Model: Over 1.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #258
53
4-0 · #38
73
Spread
IU -32.5
✓ LIN W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼5
▼ Under 126
Projected
62–93
✓ IU won
Model: LIN by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 0.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #168
61
4-0 · #142
75
Spread
SBU -11.5
✓ SBU W ATS
Total
146.5
▼ Under 136
Projected
72–81
✓ SBU won
Model: RMU by 1.9 ✗ Model: Over 6.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-4 · #156
70
1-1 · #191
80
Spread
STBK -3.5
✓ STBK W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼1
▲ Over 150
Projected
70–75
✓ STBK won
Model: STBK by 1.2 ✓ Model: Over 8.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #299
49
2-1 · #9 AP #14
97
Spread
SJU -28.5
✓ SJU W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲4
▼ Under 146
Projected
61–96
✓ SJU won
Model: SJU by 6.7 ✓ Model: Under 1.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #245
60
4-0 · #7 AP #20
89
Spread
TENN -31.5
✓ TNST W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲6
▼ Under 149
Projected
63–93
✓ TENN won
Model: TNST by 2.1 ✓ Model: Under 1.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #211
94
2-2 · #179
95
Spread
COR -5.5
✓ COLG W ATS
Total
161.5 ▼3
▲ Over 189
Projected
79–83
✓ COR won
Model: COLG by 1.2 ✓ Model: Over 0.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-0 · #27
84
3-1 · #82
72
Spread
NEB -8.5
✓ NEB W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼1
▲ Over 156
Projected
79–73
✓ NEB won
Model: UNM by 2.3 ✗ Model: Over 0.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #322
74
4-0 · #22
109
Spread
VAN -36.5
✓ TXSO W ATS
Total
164.5 ▼3
▲ Over 183
Projected
67–97
✓ VAN won
Model: TXSO by 6.2 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #229
57
1-3 · #135
70
Spread
PRIN -2.5
✓ PRIN W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼9
▼ Under 127
Projected
74–73
✗ NE lost
Model: NE by 3.4 ✗ Model: Over 0.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #163
59
FAU
2-1 · #109
82
Spread
FAU -7.5
✓ FAU W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼2
▼ Under 141
Projected
75–82
✓ FAU won
Model: PAC by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 2.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #284
94
101
Spread
QUC -7.5
✓ UNCG W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼1
▲ Over 195
Projected
75–81
✓ QUC won
Model: UNCG by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 6.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #230
90
2-2 · #270
66
Spread
CMU -4.5
✓ NKU W ATS
Total
146.5
▲ Over 156
Projected
72–76
✗ CMU lost
Model: NKU by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 1.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-5 · #362
54
Iowa
4-0 · #43
93
Spread
IOWA -31.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼7
▲ Over 147
Projected
63–93
✓ IOWA won
Model: CHST by 1.0 ✗ Model: Over 13.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #331
71
2-0 · #125
76
Spread
M-OH -15.5
✓ MERC W ATS
Total
139.5 ▼2
▲ Over 147
Projected
66–76
✓ M-OH won
Model: MERC by 4.9 ✓ Model: Over 2.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
Pitt
4-1 · #74
67
UCF
4-1 · #39
77
Spread
PITT -1.5
✓ UCF W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼6
▼ Under 144
Projected
76–78
✓ UCF won
Model: UCF by 2.9 ✓ Model: Over 4.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-1 · #324
53
1-2 · #100
69
Spread
FOR -4.5
✓ FOR W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼7
▼ Under 122
Projected
71–78
✓ FOR won
Model: FOR by 1.9 ✓ Model: Over 3.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
Elon
2-1 · #232
72
3-1 · #25
99
Spread
MIA -19.5
✓ MIA W ATS
Total
164.5 ▲3
▲ Over 171
Projected
73–92
✓ MIA won
Model: ELON by 0.6 ✗ Model: Under 0.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #187
58
4-0 · #33
91
Spread
OSU -26.5
✓ OSU W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲3
▼ Under 149
Projected
69–91
✓ OSU won
Model: WMU by 4.1 ✗ Model: Over 0.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #185
90
Rice
1-3 · #177
74
Spread
RICE -4.5
✓ TAR W ATS
Total
146.5
▲ Over 164
Projected
72–76
✗ RICE lost
Model: TAR by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #305
71
2-2 · #31
95
Spread
OU -24.5
✓ ORU W ATS
Total
166.5 ▲4
▼ Under 166
Projected
71–95
✓ OU won
Model: OU by 0.2 ✗ Model: Under 0.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #240
56
2-2 · #112
74
Spread
UNT -16.5
✓ UNT W ATS
Total
134.5
▼ Under 130
Projected
60–79
✓ UNT won
Model: UNT by 2.4 ✓ Model: Over 4.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #291
68
5-0 · #54
102
Spread
MIZ -24.5
✓ MIZ W ATS
Total
171.5 ▼1
▼ Under 170
Projected
76–97
✓ MIZ won
Model: SDAK by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-1 · #89
83
3-1 · #12 AP #15
84
Spread
TTU -9.5
✓ WAKE W ATS
Total
160.5 ▲5
▲ Over 167
Projected
74–84
✓ TTU won
Model: Under 2.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #347
45
4-0 · #2 AP #2
91
Spread
HOU -40.5
✓ HOU W ATS
Total
134.5 ▲2
▲ Over 136
Projected
48–87
✓ HOU won
Model: RID by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 0.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #164
92
Utah
5-0 · #73
85
Spread
UTAH -14.5
✓ CP W ATS
Total
167.5 ▼1
▲ Over 177
Projected
76–90
✗ UTAH lost
Model: CP by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 1.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-1 · #53
77
4-0 · #83
98
Spread
MSST -2.5
✓ KSU W ATS
Total
164.5 ▲3
▲ Over 175
Projected
83–82
✗ MSST lost
Model: KSU by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 0.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Troy
3-2 · #147
106
USC
3-0 · #36
107
Spread
USC -18.5
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲3
▲ Over 213
Projected
76–92
✓ USC won
Model: TROY by 2.4 ✓ Model: Over 7.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #114
85
UNLV
2-2 · #98
99
Spread
UNLV -10.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲4
▲ Over 184
Projected
76–84
✓ UNLV won
Model: JOES by 2.3 ✗ Model: Under 1.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-1 · #60
83
4-1 · #140
76
Spread
HAW -1.5
✓ ASU W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼8
▲ Over 159
Projected
73–73
✗ HAW lost
Model: ASU by 1.4 ✓ Model: Over 2.3 ✓
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
0-2 · #289
87
UIW -9.5 145.5 UIW -9.7 UIW +0.2 144.9 Under 0.6 80% UIW L L ›
Final
3-1 · #90
90
2-1 · #110
80
HPU -10.5 158.5 HPU -7.6 UIC +2.9 157.7 Under 0.8 75% HPU W L ›
Final
0-6 · #363
70
3-1 · #231
98
MRSH -20.5 164.5 MRSH -16.9 UAPB +3.6 163.0 Under 1.5 93% MRSH L L ›
Final
1-2 · #76
71
4-0 · #23
80
PUR -14.5 156.5 PUR -19.4 PUR +4.9 158.3 Over 1.8 96% PUR L L ›
Final
1-3 · #258
53
4-0 · #38
73
IU -32.5 155.5 IU -31.0 LIN +1.5 155.7 Over 0.2 100% IU W L ›
Final
1-1 · #168
61
4-0 · #142
75
SBU -11.5 146.5 SBU -9.6 RMU +1.9 152.6 Over 6.1 80% SBU L L ›
Final
1-4 · #156
70
1-1 · #191
80
STBK -3.5 136.5 STBK -4.7 STBK +1.2 145.1 Over 8.6 66% STBK W W ›
Final
2-3 · #299
49
2-1 · #9
97
SJU -28.5 158.5 SJU -35.2 SJU +6.7 156.9 Under 1.6 100% SJU W W ›
Final
0-2 · #245
60
4-0 · #7
89
TENN -31.5 157.5 TENN -29.4 TNST +2.1 155.9 Under 1.6 99% TENN W W ›
Final
2-3 · #211
94
2-2 · #179
95
COR -5.5 161.5 COR -4.3 COLG +1.2 161.9 Over 0.4 65% COR W W ›
Final
4-0 · #27
84
3-1 · #82
72
NEB -8.5 151.5 NEB -6.2 UNM +2.3 152.1 Over 0.6 71% NEB L W ›
Final
0-4 · #322
74
4-0 · #22
109
VAN -36.5 164.5 VAN -30.3 TXSO +6.2 164.0 Under 0.5 100% VAN W L ›
Final
2-2 · #229
57
1-3 · #135
70
PRIN -2.5 145.5 NE -0.9 NE +3.4 146.2 Over 0.7 53% NE L L ›
Final
2-1 · #163
59
2-1 · #109
82
FAU -7.5 154.5 FAU -7.3 PAC +0.2 156.7 Over 2.2 74% FAU L L ›
Final
0-4 · #284
94
QUC -7.5 150.5 QUC -6.2 UNCG +1.3 156.6 Over 6.1 71% QUC W W ›
Final
0-2 · #230
90
2-2 · #270
66
CMU -4.5 146.5 CMU -3.6 NKU +0.9 147.6 Over 1.1 62% CMU W W ›
Final
0-5 · #362
54
4-0 · #43
93
IOWA -31.5 142.5 IOWA -30.5 CHST +1.0 155.5 Over 13.0 100% IOWA L W ›
Final
2-2 · #331
71
2-0 · #125
76
M-OH -15.5 139.5 M-OH -10.6 MERC +4.9 141.9 Over 2.4 82% M-OH W W ›
Final
4-1 · #74
67
4-1 · #39
77
PITT -1.5 149.5 UCF -1.4 UCF +2.9 153.7 Over 4.2 55% UCF W L ›
Final
3-1 · #324
53
1-2 · #100
69
FOR -4.5 145.5 FOR -6.4 FOR +1.9 148.8 Over 3.3 71% FOR W L ›
Final
2-1 · #232
72
3-1 · #25
99
MIA -19.5 164.5 MIA -18.9 ELON +0.6 164.2 Under 0.3 95% MIA L L ›
Final
2-2 · #187
58
4-0 · #33
91
OSU -26.5 159.5 OSU -22.4 WMU +4.1 160.1 Over 0.6 97% OSU L L ›
Final
2-3 · #185
90
1-3 · #177
74
RICE -4.5 146.5 RICE -4.0 TAR +0.5 147.8 Over 1.3 64% RICE W W ›
Final
0-3 · #305
71
2-2 · #31
95
OU -24.5 166.5 OU -24.7 OU +0.2 166.1 Under 0.4 98% OU L W ›
Final
0-3 · #240
56
2-2 · #112
74
UNT -16.5 134.5 UNT -18.9 UNT +2.4 138.7 Over 4.2 95% UNT W L ›
Final
2-2 · #291
68
5-0 · #54
102
MIZ -24.5 171.5 MIZ -21.0 SDAK +3.5 171.9 Over 0.4 97% MIZ L L ›
Final
3-1 · #89
83
3-1 · #12
84
TTU -9.5 160.5 TTU -9.5 — 158.4 Under 2.1 80% TTU L ›
Final
0-3 · #347
45
4-0 · #2
91
HOU -40.5 134.5 HOU -39.3 RID +1.2 135.0 Over 0.5 100% HOU L W ›
Final
1-3 · #164
92
5-0 · #73
85
UTAH -14.5 167.5 UTAH -14.0 CP +0.5 166.1 Under 1.4 89% UTAH W L ›
Final
2-1 · #53
77
4-0 · #83
98
MSST -2.5 164.5 MSST -1.6 KSU +0.9 165.2 Over 0.7 56% MSST W W ›
Final
3-2 · #147
106
3-0 · #36
107
USC -18.5 159.5 USC -16.1 TROY +2.4 167.1 Over 7.6 92% USC W W ›
Final
2-2 · #114
85
2-2 · #98
99
UNLV -10.5 161.5 UNLV -8.2 JOES +2.3 160.2 Under 1.3 76% UNLV L L ›
Final
3-1 · #60
83
4-1 · #140
76
HAW -1.5 143.5 HAW -0.1 ASU +1.4 145.8 Over 2.3 50% HAW W W ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record