Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games5656 final · 0 to play
Lines moved471+ pt since the open · 56 with a line
Totals moved521+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS26-3046% covered
Upsets11outright
Over / Under26-3046% over
Model Favorite47-984% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
PRES @ CALCAL -19.5 → CAL -10.59 → PRES145.5 → 124.5▼ 21
NJIT @ DREXDREX -9.5 → DREX -13.54 → DREX133.5 → 138.5▲ 5
JAX @ GMUGMU -12.5 → GMU -16.54 → GMU135.5 → 136.5▲ 1
LR @ MURMUR -14.5 → MUR -13.51 → LR161.5 → 153.5▼ 8
SPU @ DELDEL -5.5 → DEL -4.51 → SPU144.5 → 137.5▼ 7
UTM @ FSUFSU -22.5 → FSU -19.53 → UTM160.5 → 165.5▲ 5
EMU @ DETMEMU -1.5 → DETM -1.53 → DETM153.5 → 157.5▲ 4
UMES @ LONGLONG -16.5 → LONG -17.51 → LONG144.5 → 138.5▼ 6
GASO @ GTGT -13.5 → GT -10.53 → GASO166.5 → 164.5▼ 2
WIN @ ARKARK -20.5 → ARK -23.53 → ARK164.5 → 168.5▲ 4
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-0 · #10 AP #17
83
3-1 · #19 AP #12
66
Spread
UK -3.5
✓ MSU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼2
▼ Under 149
Projected
76–81
✗ UK lost
Model: UK by 2.3 ✗ Model: Over 4.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #153
71
3-0 · #62
80
Spread
RUTG -16.5
✓ AMER W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼3
▲ Over 151
Projected
67–84
✓ RUTG won
Model: RUTG by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 8.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-0 · #186
90
3-0 · #237
94
Spread
UVM -1.5
✓ BUF W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼1
▲ Over 184
Projected
75–73
✗ UVM lost
Model: UVM by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 6.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Navy
1-2 · #199
61
4-0 · #44 AP #18
73
Spread
UNC -26.5
✓ NAVY W ATS
Total
160.5 ▲1
▼ Under 134
Projected
67–88
✓ UNC won
Model: NAVY by 5.2 ✓ Model: Under 6.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #269
70
0-2 · #206
81
Spread
DEL -4.5
✓ DEL W ATS
Total
137.5 ▼7
▲ Over 151
Projected
70–76
✓ DEL won
Model: DEL by 1.0 ✓ Model: Over 8.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
NJIT
3-1 · #316
43
0-3 · #262
75
Spread
DREX -13.5
✓ DREX W ATS
Total
138.5 ▲5
▼ Under 118
Projected
66–73
✓ DREX won
Model: NJIT by 6.9 ✗ Model: Over 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #165
75
1-3 · #158
81
Spread
TOW -3.5
✓ JMU W ATS
Total
140.5 ▲5
▲ Over 156
Projected
72–68
✗ TOW lost
Model: TOW by 0.4 ✗ Model: Under 1.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #355
45
4-0 · #67
68
Spread
HALL -25.5
✓ NHVN W ATS
Total
129.5 ▲2
▼ Under 113
Projected
54–76
✓ HALL won
Model: NHVN by 3.8 ✓ Model: Over 0.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #286
66
2-2 · #52
98
Spread
PROV -29.5
✓ PROV W ATS
Total
161.5 ▼3
▲ Over 164
Projected
66–93
✓ PROV won
Model: UNH by 2.3 ✗ Model: Under 2.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-0 · #341
73
2-1 · #81
87
Spread
FSU -19.5
✓ UTM W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲5
▼ Under 160
Projected
69–89
✓ FSU won
Model: FSU by 1.1 ✗ Model: Under 7.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #246
58
3-0 · #79
87
Spread
SC -10.5
✓ SC W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼2
▼ Under 145
Projected
70–84
✓ SC won
Model: SC by 3.8 ✓ Model: Over 0.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #135
69
Iona
3-0 · #233
89
Spread
IONA -2.5
✓ IONA W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲2
▲ Over 158
Projected
76–78
✓ IONA won
Model: PRIN by 0.4 ✗ Model: Under 1.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #234
69
2-2 · #49
99
Spread
XAV -10.5
✓ XAV W ATS
Total
150.5
▲ Over 168
Projected
69–81
✓ XAV won
Model: XAV by 1.9 ✓ Model: Under 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #188
72
0-3 · #277
62
Spread
DETM -1.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲4
▼ Under 134
Projected
79–77
✓ EMU won
Model: EMU by 3.1 ✓ Model: Under 2.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #223
57
3-0 · #93
79
Spread
GMU -16.5
✓ GMU W ATS
Total
136.5 ▲1
▼ Under 136
Projected
61–77
✓ GMU won
Model: JAX by 0.6 ✗ Model: Over 1.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #364
83
2-1 · #218
82
Spread
LONG -17.5
✓ UMES W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼6
▲ Over 165
Projected
63–79
✗ LONG lost
Model: UMES by 2.1 ✓ Model: Over 3.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #294
78
4-1 · #151
93
Spread
KENT -10.5
✓ KENT W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲2
▲ Over 171
Projected
79–89
✓ KENT won
Model: EKU by 1.1 ✗ Model: Over 6.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #340
91
1-3 · #326
103
Spread
IUIN -1.5
✓ CHSO W ATS
Total
188.5 ▼3
▲ Over 194
Projected
86–87
✓ CHSO won
Model: CHSO by 2.5 ✓ Model: Under 16.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #145
60
1-1 · #120
85
Spread
UNCW -6.5
✓ UNCW W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼2
▼ Under 145
Projected
73–78
✓ UNCW won
Model: ECU by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 5.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #261
49
2-1 · #170
54
Spread
COLU -4.5
✓ COLU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼3
▼ Under 103
Projected
72–79
✓ COLU won
Model: COLU by 2.3 ✓ Model: Over 5.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #159
52
2-2 · #95
63
Spread
BC -12.5
✓ HAMP W ATS
Total
135.5 ▼3
▼ Under 115
Projected
65–78
✓ BC won
Model: HAMP by 0.1 ✓ Model: Over 7.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #317
49
0-4 · #156
68
Spread
BRWN -2.5
✓ BRWN W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲1
▼ Under 117
Projected
73–75
✓ BRWN won
Model: HC by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 5.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
62
0-3 · #216
79
Spread
LEH -10.5
✓ LEH W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼4
▼ Under 141
Projected
67–81
✓ LEH won
Model: LEH by 3.5 ✓ Model: Under 3.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #296
66
3-1 · #94
68
Spread
GT -10.5
✓ GASO W ATS
Total
164.5 ▼2
▼ Under 134
Projected
73–86
✓ GT won
Model: GT by 2.9 ✗ Model: Under 5.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #275
79
0-3 · #345
73
Spread
NCAT -2.5
✓ NCAT W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲3
▼ Under 152
Projected
81–78
✓ NCAT won
Model: NCAT by 0.6 ✓ Model: Under 2.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #205
83
3-1 · #18 AP #21
84
Spread
ARK -23.5
✓ WIN W ATS
Total
168.5 ▲4
▼ Under 167
Projected
73–91
✓ ARK won
Model: WIN by 5.8 ✓ Model: Under 4.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-5 · #360
81
LSU
3-0 · #51
107
Spread
LSU -32.5
✓ ALCN W ATS
Total
155.5 ▼2
▲ Over 188
Projected
62–95
✓ LSU won
Model: LSU by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 0.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #210
65
4-0 · #46
72
Spread
MISS -20.5
✓ APSU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼4
▼ Under 137
Projected
64–83
✓ MISS won
Model: APSU by 1.7 ✓ Model: Over 1.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #273
81
2-2 · #28
86
Spread
TA&M -17.5
✓ MONT W ATS
Total
164.5
▲ Over 167
Projected
72–91
✓ TA&M won
Model: TA&M by 0.8 ✗ Model: Under 1.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #348
62
2-2 · #66
93
Spread
DEP -21.5
✓ DEP W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲2
▼ Under 155
Projected
67–86
✓ DEP won
Model: GWEB by 2.4 ✗ Model: Under 2.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #222
68
3-1 · #132
89
Spread
MUR -13.5
✓ MUR W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼8
▲ Over 157
Projected
68–84
✓ MUR won
Model: MUR by 1.7 ✓ Model: Under 1.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #257
84
0-2 · #255
76
Spread
EVAN -2.5
✓ UTA W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼3
▲ Over 160
Projected
69–71
✗ EVAN lost
Model: UTA by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 1.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #253
49
2-2 · #103
63
Spread
TXST -1.5
✓ TXST W ATS
Total
138.5 ▼2
▼ Under 112
Projected
70–72
✓ TXST won
Model: TXST by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 3.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #362
54
3-1 · #70
66
Spread
MINN -27.5
✓ CHST W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼5
▼ Under 120
Projected
61–87
✓ MINN won
Model: CHST by 1.4 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #334
57
3-0 · #131
70
Spread
UNI -19.5
✓ NIU W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲2
▼ Under 127
Projected
63–82
✓ UNI won
Model: NIU by 0.6 ✓ Model: Under 1.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-5 · #363
60
SMU
4-0 · #55
106
Spread
SMU -35.5
✓ SMU W ATS
Total
168.5
▼ Under 166
Projected
67–97
✓ SMU won
Model: UAPB by 5.4 ✗ Model: Under 3.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-1 · #105
86
Yale
3-0 · #126
77
Spread
YALE -8.5
✓ URI W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼3
▲ Over 163
Projected
73–82
✗ YALE lost
Model: YALE by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 1.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Army
0-3 · #288
73
1-2 · #179
86
Spread
COR -17.5
✓ ARMY W ATS
Total
164.5
▼ Under 159
Projected
75–90
✓ COR won
Model: ARMY by 2.1 ✓ Model: Over 0.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #306
70
Iowa
3-0 · #43
99
Spread
IOWA -23.5
✓ IOWA W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼3
▲ Over 169
Projected
66–90
✓ IOWA won
Model: SEMO by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 8.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-1 · #16 AP #24
66
Duke
4-0 · #3 AP #5
78
Spread
DUKE -10.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼1
▼ Under 144
Projected
70–79
✓ DUKE won
Model: KU by 1.5 ✗ Model: Under 1.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-0 · #193
78
2-2 · #174
80
Spread
SFA -2.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲1
▲ Over 158
Projected
73–73
✗ SFA lost
Model: FRES by 2.0 ✓ Model: Under 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #338
68
1-1 · #146
78
Spread
USD -6.5
✓ USD W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼5
▼ Under 146
Projected
68–76
✓ USD won
Model: USD by 1.7 ✓ Model: Under 4.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-0 · #77
59
3-0 · #86
62
Spread
BOIS -9.5
✓ WICH W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼3
▼ Under 121
Projected
72–78
✓ BOIS won
Model: WICH by 4.2 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #249
77
Utah
4-0 · #73
85
Spread
UTAH -13.5
✓ PFW W ATS
Total
161.5 ▼1
▲ Over 162
Projected
74–89
✓ UTAH won
Model: UTAH by 0.8 ✗ Model: Over 1.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #155
73
3-0 · #63
78
Spread
SYR -21.5
✓ MONM W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼2
▲ Over 151
Projected
62–82
✓ SYR won
Model: MONM by 1.9 ✓ Model: Under 1.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #347
65
3-1 · #11
99
Spread
TEX -30.5
✓ TEX W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼1
▲ Over 164
Projected
59–87
✓ TEX won
Model: RID by 2.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #276
79
0-2 · #172
90
Spread
PEPP -5.5
✓ PEPP W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲3
▲ Over 169
Projected
77–80
✓ PEPP won
Model: NOLA by 2.3 ✗ Model: Under 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #309
93
3-1 · #56
99
Spread
WASH -23.5
✓ SOU W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲3
▲ Over 192
Projected
68–89
✓ WASH won
Model: SOU by 2.7 ✓ Model: Under 1.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #318
64
2-1 · #161
84
Spread
SF -16.5
✓ SF W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼3
▲ Over 148
Projected
65–82
✓ SF won
Model: SF by 0.2 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #182
75
3-1 · #96
71
Spread
NEV -12.5
✓ UCD W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲1
▲ Over 146
Projected
67–80
✗ NEV lost
Model: NEV by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 2.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Troy
2-2 · #147
108
2-0 · #75
107
Spread
SDSU -14.5
✓ TROY W ATS
Total
137.5 ▼4
▲ Over 215
Projected
64–77
✗ SDSU lost
Model: TROY by 1.5 ✓ Model: Over 4.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #344
55
3-0 · #106
64
Spread
SCU -14.5
✓ IDST W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼4
▼ Under 119
Projected
68–84
✓ SCU won
Model: SCU by 2.0 ✗ Model: Over 10.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #281
57
3-0 · #203
80
Spread
CBU -12.5
✓ CBU W ATS
Total
142.5 ▲2
▼ Under 137
Projected
69–78
✓ CBU won
Model: UCR by 3.6 ✗ Model: Over 3.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #221
66
3-0 · #85
93
Spread
STAN -20.5
✓ STAN W ATS
Total
139.5 ▲4
▲ Over 159
Projected
62–81
✓ STAN won
Model: UL by 2.2 ✗ Model: Over 3.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #183
57
3-1 · #92
67
Spread
CAL -10.5
✓ PRES W ATS
Total
124.5 ▼21
▼ Under 124
Projected
65–84
✓ CAL won
Model: CAL by 8.3 ✗ Model: Over 24.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #196
48
UCLA
3-1 · #26 AP #19
79
Spread
UCLA -27.5
✓ UCLA W ATS
Total
146.5 ▲4
▼ Under 127
Projected
58–86
✓ UCLA won
Model: UCLA by 0.3 ✓ Model: Under 1.9 ✓
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
3-0 · #10
83
3-1 · #19
66
UK -3.5 152.5 UK -5.8 UK +2.3 156.8 Over 4.3 69% UK L L ›
Final
1-2 · #153
71
3-0 · #62
80
RUTG -16.5 143.5 RUTG -16.7 RUTG +0.2 151.5 Over 8.0 93% RUTG L W ›
Final
2-0 · #186
90
3-0 · #237
94
UVM -1.5 141.5 UVM -2.3 UVM +0.8 147.9 Over 6.4 58% UVM L W ›
Final
1-2 · #199
61
4-0 · #44
73
UNC -26.5 160.5 UNC -21.3 NAVY +5.2 154.4 Under 6.1 97% UNC W W ›
Final
1-2 · #269
70
0-2 · #206
81
DEL -4.5 137.5 DEL -5.5 DEL +1.0 145.6 Over 8.1 69% DEL W W ›
Final
3-1 · #316
43
0-3 · #262
75
DREX -13.5 138.5 DREX -6.6 NJIT +6.9 139.3 Over 0.8 72% DREX L L ›
Final
2-1 · #165
75
1-3 · #158
81
TOW -3.5 140.5 TOW -3.9 TOW +0.4 139.5 Under 1.0 63% TOW L L ›
Final
2-3 · #355
45
4-0 · #67
68
HALL -25.5 129.5 HALL -21.7 NHVN +3.8 129.7 Over 0.2 97% HALL W L ›
Final
0-3 · #286
66
2-2 · #52
98
PROV -29.5 161.5 PROV -27.2 UNH +2.3 159.1 Under 2.4 99% PROV L L ›
Final
2-0 · #341
73
2-1 · #81
87
FSU -19.5 165.5 FSU -20.6 FSU +1.1 157.7 Under 7.8 96% FSU L W ›
Final
1-3 · #246
58
3-0 · #79
87
SC -10.5 153.5 SC -14.3 SC +3.8 153.6 Over 0.1 89% SC W L ›
Final
1-2 · #135
69
3-0 · #233
89
IONA -2.5 154.5 IONA -2.1 PRIN +0.4 153.3 Under 1.2 57% IONA L L ›
Final
1-2 · #234
69
2-2 · #49
99
XAV -10.5 150.5 XAV -12.4 XAV +1.9 149.7 Under 0.8 86% XAV W L ›
Final
1-2 · #188
72
0-3 · #277
62
DETM -1.5 157.5 EMU -1.6 EMU +3.1 155.4 Under 2.1 55% EMU W W ›
Final
1-2 · #223
57
3-0 · #93
79
GMU -16.5 136.5 GMU -15.9 JAX +0.6 138.0 Over 1.5 92% GMU L L ›
Final
0-4 · #364
83
2-1 · #218
82
LONG -17.5 138.5 LONG -15.4 UMES +2.1 141.8 Over 3.3 91% LONG W W ›
Final
0-2 · #294
78
4-1 · #151
93
KENT -10.5 161.5 KENT -9.4 EKU +1.1 167.6 Over 6.1 79% KENT L W ›
Final
1-3 · #340
91
1-3 · #326
103
IUIN -1.5 188.5 CHSO -1.0 CHSO +2.5 172.1 Under 16.4 53% CHSO W L ›
Final
1-1 · #145
60
1-1 · #120
85
UNCW -6.5 145.5 UNCW -5.3 ECU +1.2 151.2 Over 5.7 68% UNCW L L ›
Final
2-2 · #261
49
2-1 · #170
54
COLU -4.5 144.5 COLU -6.8 COLU +2.3 150.4 Over 5.9 73% COLU W L ›
Final
1-3 · #159
52
2-2 · #95
63
BC -12.5 135.5 BC -12.4 HAMP +0.1 142.7 Over 7.2 86% BC W L ›
Final
1-3 · #317
49
0-4 · #156
68
BRWN -2.5 141.5 BRWN -2.2 HC +0.3 147.1 Over 5.6 58% BRWN L L ›
Final
0-3 · #216
79
LEH -10.5 151.5 LEH -14.0 LEH +3.5 148.1 Under 3.4 89% LEH W W ›
Final
2-1 · #296
66
3-1 · #94
68
GT -10.5 164.5 GT -13.4 GT +2.9 158.9 Under 5.6 88% GT L W ›
Final
1-1 · #275
79
0-3 · #345
73
NCAT -2.5 161.5 NCAT -3.1 NCAT +0.6 158.8 Under 2.7 61% NCAT W W ›
Final
2-2 · #205
83
3-1 · #18
84
ARK -23.5 168.5 ARK -17.7 WIN +5.8 163.9 Under 4.6 94% ARK W W ›
Final
0-5 · #360
81
3-0 · #51
107
LSU -32.5 155.5 LSU -33.4 LSU +0.9 156.4 Over 0.9 100% LSU L W ›
Final
2-1 · #210
65
4-0 · #46
72
MISS -20.5 145.5 MISS -18.8 APSU +1.7 147.1 Over 1.6 95% MISS W L ›
Final
2-1 · #273
81
2-2 · #28
86
TA&M -17.5 164.5 TA&M -18.3 TA&M +0.8 163.0 Under 1.5 95% TA&M L L ›
Final
0-3 · #348
62
2-2 · #66
93
DEP -21.5 155.5 DEP -19.1 GWEB +2.4 153.3 Under 2.2 95% DEP L W ›
Final
1-2 · #222
68
3-1 · #132
89
MUR -13.5 153.5 MUR -15.2 MUR +1.7 151.9 Under 1.6 91% MUR W L ›
Final
1-1 · #257
84
0-2 · #255
76
EVAN -2.5 138.5 EVAN -1.9 UTA +0.6 140.2 Over 1.7 57% EVAN W W ›
Final
1-1 · #253
49
2-2 · #103
63
TXST -1.5 138.5 TXST -1.9 TXST +0.4 141.9 Over 3.4 57% TXST W L ›
Final
0-4 · #362
54
3-1 · #70
66
MINN -27.5 144.5 MINN -26.1 CHST +1.4 148.0 Over 3.5 99% MINN W L ›
Final
1-2 · #334
57
3-0 · #131
70
UNI -19.5 146.5 UNI -18.9 NIU +0.6 144.8 Under 1.7 95% UNI W W ›
Final
0-5 · #363
60
4-0 · #55
106
SMU -35.5 168.5 SMU -30.1 UAPB +5.4 164.6 Under 3.9 100% SMU L W ›
Final
3-1 · #105
86
3-0 · #126
77
YALE -8.5 153.5 YALE -9.7 YALE +1.2 154.7 Over 1.2 80% YALE L W ›
Final
0-3 · #288
73
1-2 · #179
86
COR -17.5 164.5 COR -15.4 ARMY +2.1 165.4 Over 0.9 91% COR W L ›
Final
0-3 · #306
70
3-0 · #43
99
IOWA -23.5 147.5 IOWA -23.4 SEMO +0.1 156.2 Over 8.7 98% IOWA L W ›
Final
3-1 · #16
66
4-0 · #3
78
DUKE -10.5 149.5 DUKE -9.0 KU +1.5 148.2 Under 1.3 78% DUKE L W ›
Final
3-0 · #193
78
2-2 · #174
80
SFA -2.5 146.5 SFA -0.5 FRES +2.0 145.7 Under 0.8 52% SFA W L ›
Final
2-1 · #338
68
1-1 · #146
78
USD -6.5 149.5 USD -8.2 USD +1.7 144.6 Under 4.9 76% USD W W ›
Final
3-0 · #77
59
3-0 · #86
62
BOIS -9.5 150.5 BOIS -5.3 WICH +4.2 150.0 Under 0.5 68% BOIS W W ›
Final
0-3 · #249
77
4-0 · #73
85
UTAH -13.5 161.5 UTAH -14.3 UTAH +0.8 162.8 Over 1.3 89% UTAH L W ›
Final
0-2 · #155
73
3-0 · #63
78
SYR -21.5 145.5 SYR -19.6 MONM +1.9 143.9 Under 1.6 96% SYR W L ›
Final
0-2 · #347
65
3-1 · #11
99
TEX -30.5 143.5 TEX -28.0 RID +2.5 145.2 Over 1.7 99% TEX L W ›
Final
2-1 · #276
79
0-2 · #172
90
PEPP -5.5 157.5 PEPP -3.2 NOLA +2.3 156.7 Under 0.8 61% PEPP L L ›
Final
0-2 · #309
93
3-1 · #56
99
WASH -23.5 157.5 WASH -20.8 SOU +2.7 156.5 Under 1.0 97% WASH W L ›
Final
0-3 · #318
64
2-1 · #161
84
SF -16.5 143.5 SF -16.7 SF +0.2 147.0 Over 3.5 93% SF W W ›
Final
2-1 · #182
75
3-1 · #96
71
NEV -12.5 143.5 NEV -12.9 NEV +0.4 146.3 Over 2.8 87% NEV L W ›
Final
2-2 · #147
108
2-0 · #75
107
SDSU -14.5 137.5 SDSU -13.0 TROY +1.5 141.5 Over 4.0 87% SDSU W W ›
Final
1-2 · #344
55
3-0 · #106
64
SCU -14.5 141.5 SCU -16.5 SCU +2.0 151.9 Over 10.4 93% SCU L L ›
Final
1-2 · #281
57
3-0 · #203
80
CBU -12.5 142.5 CBU -8.9 UCR +3.6 146.0 Over 3.5 78% CBU L L ›
Final
1-3 · #221
66
3-0 · #85
93
STAN -20.5 139.5 STAN -18.3 UL +2.2 142.7 Over 3.2 95% STAN L W ›
Final
2-3 · #183
57
3-1 · #92
67
CAL -10.5 124.5 CAL -18.8 CAL +8.3 148.8 Over 24.3 95% CAL L L ›
Final
1-2 · #196
48
3-1 · #26
79
UCLA -27.5 146.5 UCLA -27.8 UCLA +0.3 144.6 Under 1.9 99% UCLA W W ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record