Day in numbers67 finalFavorites 39-28 ATS14 upsetsO/U 31-36Model Favorite 52-15Open
Games6767 final · 0 to play
Lines moved391+ pt since the open · 67 with a line
Totals moved581+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS39-2858% covered
Upsets14outright
Over / Under31-3646% over
Model Favorite52-1578% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
IUIN vs ALSTALST -2.5 → IUIN -2.55 → IUIN182.5 → 181.5▼ 1
CHSO @ ECUECU -9.5 → ECU -13.54 → ECU157.5 → 157.5no move
EVAN vs ORSTORST -8.5 → ORST -6.52 → EVAN144.5 → 136.5▼ 8
WIS @ BYUBYU -4.5 → BYU -4.5no move158.5 → 165.5▲ 7
USU vs TULNUSU -11.5 → USU -8.53 → TULN151.5 → 151.5no move
CAM vs UTAUTA -1.5 → CAM -1.53 → CAM154.5 → 151.5▼ 3
NU vs UVAUVA -1.5 → UVA -4.53 → UVA143.5 → 149.5▲ 6
ARMY @ MRSTMRST -15.5 → MRST -12.53 → ARMY131.5 → 132.5▲ 1
GRAM @ CBUCBU -11.5 → CBU -14.53 → CBU144.5 → 144.5no move
GB vs YALEYALE -15.5 → YALE -17.52 → YALE153.5 → 148.5▼ 5
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
0-4 · #226
67
Yale
3-1 · #126
73
Spread
YALE -17.5
✓ GB W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼5
▼ Under 140
Projected
68–87
✓ YALE won
Model: YALE by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 6.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-0 · #58
96
Tulane
3-1 · #130
75
Spread
USU -8.5
✓ USU W ATS
Total
151.5
▲ Over 171
Projected
81–69
✓ USU won
Model: USU by 3.2 ✓ Model: Under 1.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-4 · #340
80
1-3 · #302
101
Spread
IUIN -2.5
✓ ALST W ATS
Total
181.5 ▼1
▼ Under 181
Projected
84–86
✓ ALST won
Model: ALST by 4.6 ✓ Model: Under 12.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
Butler
3-1 · #72
79
4-0 · #79
72
Spread
BTLR -3.5
✓ BTLR W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼2
▲ Over 151
Projected
81–77
✓ BTLR won
Model: BTLR by 0.2 ✓ Model: Over 7.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
UMass
3-1 · #209
65
1-3 · #117
69
Spread
COFC -3.5
✓ COFC W ATS
Total
161.5 ▲4
▼ Under 134
Projected
80–81
✓ COFC won
Model: MASS by 2.3 ✗ Model: Under 0.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-3 · #243
71
2-1 · #257
67
Spread
CAM -1.5
✓ CAM W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼3
▼ Under 138
Projected
76–76
✓ CAM won
Model: UTA by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 0.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-0 · #115
59
3-2 · #95
49
Spread
BC -1.5
✓ DAV W ATS
Total
140.5 ▲1
▼ Under 108
Projected
70–73
✗ BC lost
Model: BC by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 2.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
4-0 · #41 AP #23
70
BYU
3-1 · #24 AP #9
98
Spread
BYU -4.5
✓ BYU W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲7
▲ Over 168
Projected
77–84
✓ BYU won
Model: BYU by 2.0 ✓ Model: Under 4.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-0 · #59
78
4-0 · #20
83
Spread
UVA -4.5
✓ UVA W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲6
▲ Over 161
Projected
74–72
✗ NU lost
Model: NU by 6.0 ✗ Model: Under 3.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
Iona
4-0 · #233
75
Akron
2-1 · #118
96
Spread
AKR -11.5
✓ AKR W ATS
Total
173.5 ▲5
▼ Under 171
Projected
79–89
✓ AKR won
Model: IONA by 1.3 ✗ Model: Under 6.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #296
72
3-1 · #81
98
Spread
FSU -18.5
✓ FSU W ATS
Total
175.5 ▼1
▼ Under 170
Projected
73–94
✓ FSU won
Model: FSU by 2.1 ✓ Model: Under 8.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #310
70
0-5 · #349
74
Spread
LAF -1.5
✓ STO W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼3
▲ Over 144
Projected
71–72
✓ STO won
Model: STO by 2.5 ✓ Model: Over 1.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
SIUE
2-2 · #256
63
1-4 · #220
77
Spread
SIUE -2.5
✓ AF W ATS
Total
130.5 ▼1
▲ Over 140
Projected
68–65
✗ SIUE lost
Model: Over 2.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-1 · #170
82
Lehigh
1-3 · #216
67
Spread
COLU -2.5
✓ COLU W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼1
▲ Over 149
Projected
72–72
✓ COLU won
Model: LEH by 1.9 ✗ Model: Over 0.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-0 · #14 AP #6
74
4-0 · #30
64
Spread
LOU -8.5
✓ LOU W ATS
Total
163.5 ▲1
▼ Under 138
Projected
83–74
✓ LOU won
Model: LOU by 0.6 ✓ Model: Under 7.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #277
56
4-0 · #10 AP #17
84
Spread
MSU -30.5
✓ DETM W ATS
Total
149.5 ▲1
▼ Under 140
Projected
60–91
✓ MSU won
Model: DETM by 0.2 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #204
91
2-2 · #188
97
Spread
OAK -1.5
✓ EMU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲1
▲ Over 188
Projected
77–75
✗ OAK lost
Model: OAK by 0.6 ✗ Model: Under 1.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #141
63
2-2 · #259
65
Spread
APP -1.5
✓ APP W ATS
Total
132.5 ▼1
▼ Under 128
Projected
69–69
✓ APP won
Model: CLT by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 4.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #337
67
4-0 · #62
54
Spread
RUTG -15.5
✓ CCSU W ATS
Total
137.5 ▼2
▼ Under 121
Projected
62–79
✗ RUTG lost
Model: RUTG by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 4.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #47
67
4-1 · #35
70
Spread
CLEM -4.5
✓ WVU W ATS
Total
132.5 ▼1
▲ Over 137
Projected
67–69
✓ CLEM won
Model: WVU by 2.7 ✓ Model: Over 3.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #346
42
Duke
5-0 · #3 AP #5
100
Spread
DUKE -39.5
✓ DUKE W ATS
Total
146.5
▼ Under 142
Projected
51–91
✓ DUKE won
Model: DUKE by 0.2 ✓ Model: Under 4.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #225
45
3-1 · #1 AP #10
80
Spread
FLA -36.5
✓ MRMK W ATS
Total
158.5 ▼2
▼ Under 125
Projected
60–95
✓ FLA won
Model: MRMK by 1.9 ✓ Model: Under 3.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-4 · #314
46
3-2 · #19 AP #12
88
Spread
UK -35.5
✓ UK W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲3
▼ Under 134
Projected
63–95
✓ UK won
Model: L-MD by 3.3 ✗ Model: Under 2.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-2 · #53
78
3-2 · #82
80
Spread
MSST -6.5
✓ UNM W ATS
Total
151.5
▲ Over 158
Projected
81–76
✗ MSST lost
Model: UNM by 2.0 ✓ Model: Over 5.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #283
84
0-4 · #365
64
Spread
CCU -3.5
✓ CCU W ATS
Total
138.5 ▲2
▲ Over 148
Projected
71–67
✓ CCU won
Model: WIU by 0.2 ✗ Model: Under 0.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #325
64
2-2 · #298
72
Spread
WGA -2.5
✓ WGA W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼2
▼ Under 136
Projected
77–80
✓ WGA won
Model: Over 3.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #350
62
ETSU
2-1 · #173
77
Spread
ETSU -10.5
✓ ETSU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼2
▼ Under 139
Projected
67–79
✓ ETSU won
Model: ETSU by 1.2 ✓ Model: Over 0.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #89
69
1-3 · #76
68
Spread
WAKE -2.5
✓ MEM W ATS
Total
160.5 ▼1
▼ Under 137
Projected
82–79
✓ WAKE won
Model: WAKE by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 0.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #120
81
1-4 · #246
73
Spread
UNCW -4.5
✓ UNCW W ATS
Total
151.5 ▼2
▲ Over 154
Projected
78–70
✓ UNCW won
Model: UNCW by 3.1 ✓ Model: Under 3.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #301
63
Siena
2-2 · #260
73
Spread
SIE -10.5
✓ UALB W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼2
▼ Under 136
Projected
66–77
✓ SIE won
Model: SIE by 0.9 ✗ Model: Over 2.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #326
77
1-2 · #145
65
Spread
ECU -13.5
✓ CHSO W ATS
Total
157.5
▼ Under 142
Projected
74–86
✗ ECU lost
Model: CHSO by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 1.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-4 · #364
57
1-3 · #359
60
Spread
CAN -3.5
✓ UMES W ATS
Total
128.5 ▼3
▼ Under 117
Projected
67–67
✗ UMES lost
Model: UMES by 3.7 ✓ Model: Over 4.9 ✗
FinalNon-conference
Army
0-4 · #288
65
Marist
1-2 · #236
76
Spread
MRST -12.5
✓ ARMY W ATS
Total
132.5 ▲1
▲ Over 141
Projected
62–74
✓ MRST won
Model: ARMY by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 4.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #345
56
1-3 · #234
88
Spread
ODU -11.5
✓ ODU W ATS
Total
156.5
▼ Under 144
Projected
74–85
✓ ODU won
Model: MORG by 1.3 ✗ Model: Over 2.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-4 · #317
66
0-3 · #311
79
Spread
SHU -7.5
✓ SHU W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲3
▼ Under 145
Projected
71–76
✓ SHU won
Model: HC by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 4.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Penn
1-2 · #137
84
Drexel
1-3 · #262
68
Spread
DREX -4.5
✓ PENN W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼1
▼ Under 152
Projected
72–75
✗ DREX lost
Model: PENN by 0.7 ✓ Model: Under 5.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-0 · #219
72
3-2 · #212
73
Spread
STMN -4.5
✓ UNCO W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲1
▼ Under 145
Projected
78–79
✓ STMN won
Model: UNCO by 4.0 ✓ Model: Under 0.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
5-0 · #228
72
UAB
2-2 · #102
80
Spread
UAB -7.5
✓ UAB W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼1
▲ Over 152
Projected
71–81
✓ UAB won
Model: UAB by 2.8 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #280
61
4-1 · #18 AP #21
115
Spread
ARK -29.5
✓ ARK W ATS
Total
159.5 ▼2
▲ Over 176
Projected
65–92
✓ ARK won
Model: JKST by 2.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #208
58
1-2 · #201
105
Spread
SDST -12.5
✓ SDST W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼3
▲ Over 163
Projected
68–79
✓ SDST won
Model: GAST by 1.9 ✗ Model: Over 3.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Omaha
1-3 · #279
73
LSU
4-0 · #51
99
Spread
LSU -20.5
✓ LSU W ATS
Total
163.5 ▼1
▲ Over 172
Projected
71–96
✓ LSU won
Model: LSU by 3.7 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #210
75
Tulsa
2-1 · #108
84
Spread
TLSA -8.5
✓ TLSA W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼3
▲ Over 159
Projected
70–78
✓ TLSA won
Model: APSU by 0.1 ✗ Model: Under 0.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-4 · #159
60
0-3 · #319
62
Spread
NORF -2.5
✓ HAMP W ATS
Total
133.5 ▲2
▼ Under 122
Projected
67–69
✓ NORF won
Model: HAMP by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 2.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #222
56
3-2 · #103
65
Spread
TXST -5.5
✓ TXST W ATS
Total
131.5 ▼5
▼ Under 121
Projected
64–73
✓ TXST won
Model: TXST by 3.2 ✓ Model: Over 4.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
0-3 · #255
73
3-1 · #99
69
Spread
ORST -6.5
✓ EVAN W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼8
▲ Over 142
Projected
68–77
✗ ORST lost
Model: ORST by 1.6 ✗ Model: Over 8.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #330
68
3-2 · #28
109
Spread
TA&M -23.5
✓ TA&M W ATS
Total
162.5 ▼5
▲ Over 177
Projected
67–93
✓ TA&M won
Model: TA&M by 2.4 ✓ Model: Under 2.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #249
60
4-0 · #69
91
Spread
SLU -19.5
✓ SLU W ATS
Total
166.5 ▲1
▼ Under 151
Projected
74–90
✓ SLU won
Model: PFW by 3.5 ✗ Model: Under 2.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #334
76
1-4 · #113
59
Spread
LUC -13.5
✓ NIU W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼2
▼ Under 135
Projected
70–83
✗ LUC lost
Model: NIU by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 4.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #281
85
2-1 · #146
71
Spread
USD -7.5
✓ UCR W ATS
Total
152.5
▲ Over 156
Projected
73–79
✗ USD lost
Model: UCR by 1.3 ✓ Model: Under 1.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-1 · #193
63
1-2 · #172
60
Spread
SFA -1.5
✓ SFA W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼2
▼ Under 123
Projected
76–77
✗ PEPP lost
Model: PEPP by 2.0 ✗ Model: Over 4.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
Denver
1-3 · #263
83
4-0 · #87
81
Spread
CSU -18.5
✓ DEN W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼2
▲ Over 164
Projected
66–88
✗ CSU lost
Model: CSU by 2.9 ✗ Model: Over 4.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #318
72
2-2 · #80
85
Spread
GCU -18.5
✓ NWST W ATS
Total
147.5 ▼4
▲ Over 157
Projected
67–84
✓ GCU won
Model: NWST by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 2.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-3 · #184
72
1-0 · #133
81
Spread
NMSU -8.5
✓ NMSU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲1
▲ Over 153
Projected
72–81
✓ NMSU won
Model: NMSU by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 7.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-1 · #182
79
4-0 · #65
95
Spread
COLO -14.5
✓ COLO W ATS
Total
152.5 ▼4
▲ Over 174
Projected
70–84
✓ COLO won
Model: UCD by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 1.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #171
69
SMU
5-0 · #55
100
Spread
SMU -14.5
✓ SMU W ATS
Total
172.5 ▲1
▼ Under 169
Projected
77–91
✓ SMU won
Model: ARST by 0.3 ✗ Model: Under 4.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #34
78
Xavier
3-2 · #49
77
Spread
UGA -10.5
✓ XAV W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲4
▼ Under 155
Projected
87–74
✓ UGA won
Model: UGA by 2.3 ✗ Model: Under 5.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #276
76
3-2 · #174
85
Spread
FRES -6.5
✓ FRES W ATS
Total
154.5
▲ Over 161
Projected
75–80
✓ FRES won
Model: NOLA by 1.4 ✗ Model: Over 0.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-1 · #12 AP #15
56
Purdue
5-0 · #23 AP #1
86
Spread
PUR -3.5
✓ PUR W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲1
▼ Under 142
Projected
76–80
✓ PUR won
Model: PUR by 1.1 ✓ Model: Over 2.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #83
85
5-0 · #27
86
Spread
NEB -1.5
✓ KSU W ATS
Total
168.5
▲ Over 171
Projected
81–82
✓ NEB won
Model: KSU by 1.1 ✓ Model: Under 6.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #309
66
0-3 · #143
80
Spread
SJSU -5.5
✓ SJSU W ATS
Total
150.5 ▲2
▼ Under 146
Projected
76–83
✓ SJSU won
Model: SJSU by 1.9 ✓ Model: Over 8.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-4 · #221
43
4-0 · #106
80
Spread
SCU -19.5
✓ SCU W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼1
▼ Under 123
Projected
63–84
✓ SCU won
Model: SCU by 1.6 ✓ Model: Over 6.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #338
59
4-0 · #203
72
Spread
CBU -14.5
✓ GRAM W ATS
Total
144.5
▼ Under 131
Projected
64–77
✓ CBU won
Model: GRAM by 0.7 ✓ Model: Under 3.7 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #162
78
0-4 · #297
72
Spread
MTST -3.5
✓ MTST W ATS
Total
140.5 ▲1
▲ Over 150
Projected
73–69
✓ MTST won
Model: MTST by 0.6 ✓ Model: Over 1.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #312
85
2-1 · #169
103
Spread
PORT -6.5
✓ PORT W ATS
Total
164.5 ▲2
▲ Over 188
Projected
75–80
✓ PORT won
Model: CSUF by 0.8 ✗ Model: Under 9.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-1 · #119
77
4-0 · #85
69
Spread
STAN -10.5
✓ SEA W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲4
▼ Under 146
Projected
70–79
✗ STAN lost
Model: SEA by 1.4 ✓ Model: Under 3.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #196
67
4-1 · #92
91
Spread
CAL -21.5
✓ CAL W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼1
▲ Over 158
Projected
67–86
✓ CAL won
Model: SAC by 2.3 ✗ Model: Under 1.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-4 · #183
46
UCLA
4-1 · #26 AP #19
86
Spread
UCLA -25.5
✓ UCLA W ATS
Total
131.5 ▲1
▲ Over 132
Projected
54–80
✓ UCLA won
Model: PRES by 0.4 ✗ Model: Over 2.3 ✓
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
0-4 · #226
67
3-1 · #126
73
YALE -17.5 148.5 YALE -18.4 YALE +0.9 154.9 Over 6.4 95% YALE L L ›
Final
3-0 · #58
96
3-1 · #130
75
USU -8.5 151.5 USU -11.7 USU +3.2 150.4 Under 1.1 85% USU W L ›
Final
1-4 · #340
80
1-3 · #302
101
IUIN -2.5 181.5 ALST -2.1 ALST +4.6 169.4 Under 12.1 57% ALST W W ›
Final
3-1 · #72
79
4-0 · #79
72
BTLR -3.5 150.5 BTLR -3.7 BTLR +0.2 157.6 Over 7.1 63% BTLR W W ›
Final
3-1 · #209
65
1-3 · #117
69
COFC -3.5 161.5 COFC -1.2 MASS +2.3 161.3 Under 0.2 54% COFC L W ›
Final
1-3 · #243
71
2-1 · #257
67
CAM -1.5 151.5 CAM -0.3 UTA +1.2 151.7 Over 0.2 51% CAM L L ›
Final
3-0 · #115
59
3-2 · #95
49
BC -1.5 140.5 BC -2.7 BC +1.2 142.6 Over 2.1 59% BC L L ›
Final
4-0 · #41
70
3-1 · #24
98
BYU -4.5 165.5 BYU -6.5 BYU +2.0 160.8 Under 4.7 71% BYU W L ›
Final
4-0 · #59
78
4-0 · #20
83
UVA -4.5 149.5 NU -1.5 NU +6.0 145.8 Under 3.7 55% NU L L ›
Final
4-0 · #233
75
2-1 · #118
96
AKR -11.5 173.5 AKR -10.2 IONA +1.3 167.2 Under 6.3 81% AKR L W ›
Final
2-2 · #296
72
3-1 · #81
98
FSU -18.5 175.5 FSU -20.6 FSU +2.1 167.1 Under 8.4 96% FSU W W ›
Final
0-4 · #310
70
0-5 · #349
74
LAF -1.5 141.5 STO -1.0 STO +2.5 142.6 Over 1.1 53% STO W W ›
Final
2-2 · #256
63
1-4 · #220
77
SIUE -2.5 130.5 SIUE -2.5 — 133.0 Over 2.5 59% SIUE W ›
Final
3-1 · #170
82
1-3 · #216
67
COLU -2.5 143.5 COLU -0.6 LEH +1.9 143.9 Over 0.4 52% COLU L W ›
Final
4-0 · #14
74
4-0 · #30
64
LOU -8.5 163.5 LOU -9.1 LOU +0.6 156.4 Under 7.1 79% LOU W W ›
Final
0-4 · #277
56
4-0 · #10
84
MSU -30.5 149.5 MSU -30.3 DETM +0.2 150.8 Over 1.3 100% MSU W L ›
Final
0-4 · #204
91
2-2 · #188
97
OAK -1.5 153.5 OAK -2.1 OAK +0.6 151.7 Under 1.8 57% OAK L L ›
Final
2-2 · #141
63
2-2 · #259
65
APP -1.5 132.5 APP -0.1 CLT +1.4 137.3 Over 4.8 50% APP L L ›
Final
1-2 · #337
67
4-0 · #62
54
RUTG -15.5 137.5 RUTG -16.9 RUTG +1.4 141.6 Over 4.1 93% RUTG L L ›
Final
5-0 · #47
67
4-1 · #35
70
CLEM -4.5 132.5 CLEM -1.8 WVU +2.7 135.8 Over 3.3 56% CLEM W W ›
Final
2-2 · #346
42
5-0 · #3
100
DUKE -39.5 146.5 DUKE -39.7 DUKE +0.2 141.8 Under 4.7 100% DUKE W W ›
Final
2-3 · #225
45
3-1 · #1
80
FLA -36.5 158.5 FLA -34.6 MRMK +1.9 155.1 Under 3.4 100% FLA W W ›
Final
1-4 · #314
46
3-2 · #19
88
UK -35.5 159.5 UK -32.2 L-MD +3.3 157.4 Under 2.1 100% UK L W ›
Final
2-2 · #53
78
3-2 · #82
80
MSST -6.5 151.5 MSST -4.5 UNM +2.0 157.0 Over 5.5 65% MSST W W ›
Final
1-2 · #283
84
0-4 · #365
64
CCU -3.5 138.5 CCU -3.3 WIU +0.2 138.2 Under 0.3 61% CCU L L ›
Final
1-3 · #325
64
2-2 · #298
72
WGA -2.5 153.5 WGA -2.5 — 156.7 Over 3.2 59% WGA L ›
Final
0-3 · #350
62
2-1 · #173
77
ETSU -10.5 144.5 ETSU -11.7 ETSU +1.2 145.4 Over 0.9 85% ETSU W L ›
Final
3-2 · #89
69
1-3 · #76
68
WAKE -2.5 160.5 WAKE -3.7 WAKE +1.2 160.7 Over 0.2 63% WAKE L L ›
Final
2-1 · #120
81
1-4 · #246
73
UNCW -4.5 151.5 UNCW -7.6 UNCW +3.1 148.3 Under 3.2 75% UNCW W L ›
Final
0-3 · #301
63
2-2 · #260
73
SIE -10.5 140.5 SIE -11.4 SIE +0.9 143.4 Over 2.9 84% SIE L L ›
Final
2-3 · #326
77
1-2 · #145
65
ECU -13.5 157.5 ECU -12.2 CHSO +1.3 159.1 Over 1.6 86% ECU W L ›
Final
1-4 · #364
57
1-3 · #359
60
CAN -3.5 128.5 UMES -0.2 UMES +3.7 133.4 Over 4.9 51% UMES W L ›
Final
0-4 · #288
65
1-2 · #236
76
MRST -12.5 132.5 MRST -11.9 ARMY +0.6 136.7 Over 4.2 85% MRST W W ›
Final
0-4 · #345
56
1-3 · #234
88
ODU -11.5 156.5 ODU -10.2 MORG +1.3 158.9 Over 2.4 81% ODU L L ›
Final
1-4 · #317
66
0-3 · #311
79
SHU -7.5 152.5 SHU -5.0 HC +2.5 147.7 Under 4.8 67% SHU L W ›
Final
1-2 · #137
84
1-3 · #262
68
DREX -4.5 152.5 DREX -3.8 PENN +0.7 147.0 Under 5.5 63% DREX W W ›
Final
1-0 · #219
72
3-2 · #212
73
STMN -4.5 157.5 STMN -0.5 UNCO +4.0 157.0 Under 0.5 52% STMN W W ›
Final
5-0 · #228
72
2-2 · #102
80
UAB -7.5 149.5 UAB -10.3 UAB +2.8 152.0 Over 2.5 82% UAB W W ›
Final
0-4 · #280
61
4-1 · #18
115
ARK -29.5 159.5 ARK -27.0 JKST +2.5 157.2 Under 2.3 99% ARK L L ›
Final
0-4 · #208
58
1-2 · #201
105
SDST -12.5 143.5 SDST -10.6 GAST +1.9 146.6 Over 3.1 82% SDST L W ›
Final
1-3 · #279
73
4-0 · #51
99
LSU -20.5 163.5 LSU -24.2 LSU +3.7 167.0 Over 3.5 98% LSU W W ›
Final
2-2 · #210
75
2-1 · #108
84
TLSA -8.5 148.5 TLSA -8.4 APSU +0.1 148.3 Under 0.2 77% TLSA L L ›
Final
1-4 · #159
60
0-3 · #319
62
NORF -2.5 133.5 NORF -1.7 HAMP +0.8 135.9 Over 2.4 56% NORF W L ›
Final
1-3 · #222
56
3-2 · #103
65
TXST -5.5 131.5 TXST -8.7 TXST +3.2 136.3 Over 4.8 78% TXST W L ›
Final
0-3 · #255
73
3-1 · #99
69
ORST -6.5 136.5 ORST -8.1 ORST +1.6 144.9 Over 8.4 76% ORST L W ›
Final
2-2 · #330
68
3-2 · #28
109
TA&M -23.5 162.5 TA&M -25.9 TA&M +2.4 159.9 Under 2.6 99% TA&M W L ›
Final
0-4 · #249
60
4-0 · #69
91
SLU -19.5 166.5 SLU -16.0 PFW +3.5 163.6 Under 2.9 92% SLU L W ›
Final
1-3 · #334
76
1-4 · #113
59
LUC -13.5 148.5 LUC -12.4 NIU +1.1 153.0 Over 4.5 86% LUC W L ›
Final
1-3 · #281
85
2-1 · #146
71
USD -7.5 152.5 USD -6.2 UCR +1.3 151.1 Under 1.4 70% USD W L ›
Final
3-1 · #193
63
1-2 · #172
60
SFA -1.5 148.5 PEPP -0.5 PEPP +2.0 152.5 Over 4.0 52% PEPP L L ›
Final
1-3 · #263
83
4-0 · #87
81
CSU -18.5 149.5 CSU -21.4 CSU +2.9 153.6 Over 4.1 97% CSU L W ›
Final
0-4 · #318
72
2-2 · #80
85
GCU -18.5 147.5 GCU -16.7 NWST +1.8 150.4 Over 2.9 93% GCU W W ›
Final
3-3 · #184
72
1-0 · #133
81
NMSU -8.5 145.5 NMSU -8.8 NMSU +0.3 152.8 Over 7.3 78% NMSU W W ›
Final
3-1 · #182
79
4-0 · #65
95
COLO -14.5 152.5 COLO -14.0 UCD +0.5 154.4 Over 1.9 89% COLO L W ›
Final
2-2 · #171
69
5-0 · #55
100
SMU -14.5 172.5 SMU -14.2 ARST +0.3 167.8 Under 4.7 89% SMU L W ›
Final
5-0 · #34
78
3-2 · #49
77
UGA -10.5 165.5 UGA -12.8 UGA +2.3 160.3 Under 5.2 87% UGA L W ›
Final
2-2 · #276
76
3-2 · #174
85
FRES -6.5 154.5 FRES -5.1 NOLA +1.4 154.8 Over 0.3 67% FRES L W ›
Final
4-1 · #12
56
5-0 · #23
86
PUR -3.5 153.5 PUR -4.6 PUR +1.1 156.2 Over 2.7 66% PUR W L ›
Final
5-0 · #83
85
5-0 · #27
86
NEB -1.5 168.5 NEB -0.4 KSU +1.1 162.5 Under 6.0 52% NEB W L ›
Final
0-3 · #309
66
0-3 · #143
80
SJSU -5.5 150.5 SJSU -7.4 SJSU +1.9 159.3 Over 8.8 74% SJSU W L ›
Final
1-4 · #221
43
4-0 · #106
80
SCU -19.5 140.5 SCU -21.1 SCU +1.6 147.2 Over 6.7 97% SCU W L ›
Final
2-2 · #338
59
4-0 · #203
72
CBU -14.5 144.5 CBU -13.8 GRAM +0.7 140.8 Under 3.7 89% CBU W W ›
Final
0-4 · #162
78
0-4 · #297
72
MTST -3.5 140.5 MTST -4.1 MTST +0.6 141.7 Over 1.2 64% MTST W W ›
Final
0-3 · #312
85
2-1 · #169
103
PORT -6.5 164.5 PORT -5.7 CSUF +0.8 154.9 Under 9.6 69% PORT L L ›
Final
3-1 · #119
77
4-0 · #85
69
STAN -10.5 152.5 STAN -9.1 SEA +1.4 149.5 Under 3.0 79% STAN W W ›
Final
1-3 · #196
67
4-1 · #92
91
CAL -21.5 154.5 CAL -19.2 SAC +2.3 153.2 Under 1.3 95% CAL L L ›
Final
2-4 · #183
46
4-1 · #26
86
UCLA -25.5 131.5 UCLA -25.1 PRES +0.4 133.8 Over 2.3 99% UCLA L W ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record