Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games5656 final · 0 to play
Lines moved391+ pt since the open · 56 with a line
Totals moved471+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS30-2654% covered
Upsets13outright
Over / Under24-3243% over
Model Favorite42-1475% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
SFPA vs BELSFPA -20.5 → BEL -21.542 → BEL153.5 → 157.5▲ 4
TOL vs TROYTOL -5.5 → TROY -2.58 → TROY160.5 → 159.5▼ 1
FAU vs LMULMU -2.5 → FAU -3.56 → FAU154.5 → 144.5▼ 10
BUCK vs BGSUBGSU -6.5 → BGSU -10.54 → BGSU147.5 → 144.5▼ 3
W&M vs UTEPUTEP -1.5 → W&M -2.54 → W&M156.5 → 159.5▲ 3
SYR vs HOUHOU -10.5 → HOU -14.54 → HOU138.5 → 140.5▲ 2
JXST @ ARSTARST -2.5 → ARST -4.52 → ARST148.5 → 155.5▲ 7
HALL vs NCSUNCSU -10.5 → NCSU -7.53 → HALL144.5 → 143.5▼ 1
KC @ LINLIN -3.5 → LIN -4.51 → LIN146.5 → 152.5▲ 6
PRIN vs BRADBRAD -6.5 → BRAD -9.53 → BRAD141.5 → 141.5no move
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-2 · #157
75
Troy
3-3 · #147
68
Spread
TROY -2.5
✓ TOL W ATS
Total
159.5 ▼1
▼ Under 143
Projected
82–87
✗ TROY lost
Model: TROY by 3.0 ✗ Model: Over 9.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-1 · #105
55
2-2 · #165
62
Spread
URI -2.5
✓ TOW W ATS
Total
140.5 ▲1
▼ Under 117
Projected
72–70
✗ URI lost
Model: Over 1.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-1 · #191
58
2-2 · #163
86
Spread
PAC -4.5
✓ PAC W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼5
▼ Under 144
Projected
73–75
✓ PAC won
Model: STBK by 2.8 ✗ Model: Over 2.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-4 · #299
66
2-2 · #200
71
Spread
BGSU -10.5
✓ BUCK W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼3
▼ Under 137
Projected
71–78
✓ BGSU won
Model: BUCK by 3.8 ✓ Model: Over 4.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #342
70
FDU
0-4 · #356
65
Spread
ETAM -3.5
✓ ETAM W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼5
▼ Under 135
Projected
77–75
✓ ETAM won
Model: FDU by 1.9 ✗ Model: Over 2.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-3 · #209
73
3-3 · #99
65
Spread
ORST -3.5
✓ MASS W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼3
▼ Under 138
Projected
76–80
✗ ORST lost
Model: ORST by 0.5 ✗ Model: Over 6.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-1 · #62
60
5-0 · #7 AP #17
85
Spread
TENN -14.5
✓ TENN W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲1
▲ Over 145
Projected
66–81
✓ TENN won
Model: TENN by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 5.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
57
4-0 · #138
94
Spread
BEL -21.5
✓ BEL W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲4
▼ Under 151
Projected
68–86
✓ BEL won
Model: SFPA by 3.4 ✗ Model: Under 3.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
UAB
3-2 · #102
81
2-2 · #195
73
Spread
UAB -2.5
✓ UAB W ATS
Total
161.5
▼ Under 154
Projected
84–81
✓ UAB won
Model: UAB by 0.5 ✓ Model: Over 3.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-0 · #160
79
2-1 · #186
73
Spread
LIB -8.5
✓ UVM W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼4
▲ Over 152
Projected
79–72
✓ LIB won
Model: UVM by 1.8 ✓ Model: Over 9.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-3 · #223
69
1-3 · #202
64
Spread
BCU -3.5
✓ JAX W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼3
▼ Under 133
Projected
72–77
✗ BCU lost
Model: BCU by 0.7 ✗ Model: Over 5.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-1 · #37
74
3-0 · #29
81
Spread
BAY -3.5
✓ BAY W ATS
Total
154.5 ▲1
▲ Over 155
Projected
79–80
✓ BAY won
Model: CREI by 2.1 ✗ Model: Over 3.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #67
85
4-0 · #48 AP #23
74
Spread
NCSU -7.5
✓ HALL W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼1
▲ Over 159
Projected
69–77
✗ NCSU lost
Model: HALL by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
VMI
1-4 · #320
70
4-0 · #237
78
Spread
BUF -5.5
✓ BUF W ATS
Total
150.5
▼ Under 148
Projected
73–81
✓ BUF won
Model: BUF by 2.7 ✓ Model: Over 4.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-5 · #226
80
Iona
5-1 · #233
75
Spread
IONA -5.5
✓ GB W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼4
▲ Over 155
Projected
77–82
✗ IONA lost
Model: GB by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 7.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #338
74
2-3 · #281
83
Spread
UCR -3.5
✓ UCR W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼2
▲ Over 157
Projected
69–75
✓ UCR won
Model: UCR by 2.6 ✓ Model: Under 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-1 · #71
61
3-2 · #16
71
Spread
KU -5.5
✓ KU W ATS
Total
143.5 ▲1
▼ Under 132
Projected
69–78
✓ KU won
Model: KU by 3.1 ✓ Model: Over 3.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-2 · #217
74
UTEP
0-2 · #190
63
Spread
W&M -2.5
✓ W&M W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲3
▼ Under 137
Projected
77–76
✓ W&M won
Model: UTEP by 1.1 ✗ Model: Under 6.0 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
0-5 · #204
83
2-1 · #293
68
Spread
OAK -3.5
✓ OAK W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼2
▲ Over 151
Projected
76–74
✓ OAK won
Model: LAM by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-0 · #13 AP #15
83
3-1 · #9 AP #14
82
Spread
ISU -2.5
✓ SJU W ATS
Total
158.5 ▼2
▲ Over 165
Projected
80–82
✗ SJU lost
Model: SJU by 4.8 ✓ Model: Over 2.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
Rice
1-4 · #177
84
1-1 · #148
89
Spread
KENN -4.5
✓ KENN W ATS
Total
159.5 ▲1
▲ Over 173
Projected
78–82
✓ KENN won
Model: RICE by 0.7 ✗ Model: Over 0.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-1 · #111
76
3-0 · #123
91
Spread
TEM -1.5
✓ UCSD W ATS
Total
148.5
▲ Over 167
Projected
75–77
✓ UCSD won
Model: UCSD by 3.0 ✓ Model: Over 3.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
USC
4-0 · #36
70
4-0 · #86
67
Spread
USC -3.5
✓ BOIS W ATS
Total
155.5
▼ Under 137
Projected
82–77
✓ USC won
Model: USC by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 4.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-1 · #101
92
MTSU
2-1 · #154
79
Spread
GW -9.5
✓ GW W ATS
Total
158.5 ▼1
▲ Over 171
Projected
85–76
✓ GW won
Model: MTSU by 0.3 ✗ Model: Over 1.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-4 · #117
78
1-4 · #255
59
Spread
COFC -4.5
✓ COFC W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲2
▼ Under 137
Projected
77–71
✓ COFC won
Model: COFC by 1.3 ✓ Model: Over 5.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-0 · #63
74
5-0 · #2 AP #3
78
Spread
HOU -14.5
✓ SYR W ATS
Total
140.5 ▲2
▲ Over 152
Projected
61–75
✓ HOU won
Model: SYR by 0.3 ✓ Model: Under 5.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-0 · #93
92
Ohio
1-4 · #128
69
Spread
GMU -7.5
✓ GMU W ATS
Total
142.5 ▼3
▲ Over 161
Projected
78–71
✓ GMU won
Model: Over 6.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-2 · #260
73
1-5 · #317
69
Spread
SIE -9.5
✓ HC W ATS
Total
137.5 ▼2
▲ Over 142
Projected
73–67
✓ SIE won
Model: HC by 3.7 ✓ Model: Over 2.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-3 · #296
61
1-4 · #265
67
Spread
YSU -1.5
✓ YSU W ATS
Total
163.5 ▼3
▼ Under 128
Projected
80–83
✓ YSU won
Model: YSU by 1.3 ✓ Model: Under 1.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
Elon
2-2 · #232
88
3-2 · #259
53
Spread
APP -5.5
✓ ELON W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼1
▼ Under 141
Projected
72–77
✗ APP lost
Model: APP by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 5.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-2 · #188
46
5-0 · #14 AP #6
87
Spread
LOU -33.5
✓ LOU W ATS
Total
162.5 ▲1
▼ Under 133
Projected
65–94
✓ LOU won
Model: EMU by 4.4 ✗ Model: Under 2.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #158
80
FIU
0-2 · #178
72
Spread
FIU -2.5
✓ JMU W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲2
▼ Under 152
Projected
76–80
✗ FIU lost
Model: FIU by 1.6 ✗ Model: Over 0.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #294
71
1-2 · #230
82
Spread
NKU -4.5
✓ NKU W ATS
Total
156.5
▼ Under 153
Projected
75–81
✓ NKU won
Model: NKU by 1.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #295
70
0-3 · #339
58
Spread
BELL -3.5
✓ BELL W ATS
Total
156.5 ▼2
▼ Under 128
Projected
83–79
✓ BELL won
Model: CIT by 0.1 ✗ Model: Over 5.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #335
67
1-4 · #258
80
Spread
LIN -4.5
✓ LIN W ATS
Total
152.5 ▲6
▼ Under 147
Projected
74–76
✓ LIN won
Model: KC by 2.8 ✗ Model: Under 3.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference
NJIT
3-3 · #316
67
4-1 · #30
94
Spread
CIN -34.5
✓ NJIT W ATS
Total
141.5 ▲3
▲ Over 161
Projected
55–83
✓ CIN won
Model: NJIT by 6.8 ✓ Model: Under 3.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #311
106
2-2 · #337
108
Spread
CCSU -3.5
✓ SHU W ATS
Total
143.5
▲ Over 214
Projected
68–72
✓ CCSU won
Model: CCSU by 1.1 ✗ Model: Under 3.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-3 · #135
64
2-3 · #167
88
Spread
BRAD -9.5
✓ BRAD W ATS
Total
141.5
▲ Over 152
Projected
69–75
✓ BRAD won
Model: PRIN by 3.5 ✗ Model: Over 2.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-4 · #305
88
FGCU
2-2 · #266
93
Spread
FGCU -11.5
✓ ORU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▼2
▲ Over 181
Projected
74–84
✓ FGCU won
Model: ORU by 0.7 ✓ Model: Over 4.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #276
78
2-3 · #53
81
Spread
MSST -23.5
✓ NOLA W ATS
Total
160.5
▼ Under 159
Projected
72–91
✓ MSST won
Model: NOLA by 3.9 ✓ Model: Over 2.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-2 · #132
60
2-1 · #127
73
Spread
MCN -2.5
✓ MCN W ATS
Total
158.5 ▲3
▼ Under 133
Projected
79–82
✓ MCN won
Model: MCN by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-3 · #287
73
5-1 · #4 AP #13
87
Spread
ILL -33.5
✓ RGV W ATS
Total
164.5 ▼2
▼ Under 160
Projected
67–97
✓ ILL won
Model: RGV by 4.0 ✓ Model: Under 0.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-1 · #21 AP #21
84
4-0 · #57
73
Spread
AUB -4.5
✓ AUB W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲2
▲ Over 157
Projected
85–74
✓ AUB won
Model: AUB by 6.7 ✓ Model: Over 3.8 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
Yale
5-1 · #126
97
4-1 · #118
94
Spread
AKR -1.5
✓ YALE W ATS
Total
156.5
▲ Over 191
Projected
80–82
✗ AKR lost
Model: AKR by 1.2 ✗ Model: Over 5.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #198
63
2-3 · #171
74
Spread
ARST -4.5
✓ ARST W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲7
▼ Under 137
Projected
77–81
✓ ARST won
Model: ARST by 0.3 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #164
87
0-2 · #321
93
Spread
CP -1.5
✓ NAU W ATS
Total
164.5 ▲2
▲ Over 180
Projected
78–77
✗ CP lost
Model: NAU by 0.5 ✓ Model: Under 9.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-5 · #246
72
SMU
6-0 · #55
89
Spread
SMU -23.5
✓ RAD W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲1
▼ Under 161
Projected
69–92
✓ SMU won
Model: RAD by 0.1 ✓ Model: Under 4.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
3-3 · #324
75
1-2 · #250
61
Spread
MOST -4.5
✓ LIU W ATS
Total
145.5 ▲2
▼ Under 136
Projected
68–74
✗ MOST lost
Model: MOST by 1.1 ✗ Model: Under 3.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
FAU
3-1 · #109
76
LMU
5-0 · #121
65
Spread
FAU -3.5
✓ FAU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼10
▼ Under 141
Projected
74–73
✓ FAU won
Model: LMU by 2.4 ✗ Model: Over 3.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
UTSA
1-2 · #192
50
1-2 · #253
61
Spread
ACU -2.5
✓ ACU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▼2
▼ Under 111
Projected
73–74
✓ ACU won
Model: UTSA by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 2.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-5 · #221
56
3-2 · #182
77
Spread
UCD -9.5
✓ UCD W ATS
Total
136.5 ▼3
▼ Under 133
Projected
63–75
✓ UCD won
Model: UCD by 2.2 ✓ Model: Over 1.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
5-0 · #17 AP #12
95
3-1 · #15 AP #8
85
Spread
GONZ -4.5
✓ GONZ W ATS
Total
178.5 ▲5
▲ Over 180
Projected
85–87
✗ ALA lost
Model: ALA by 5.8 ✗ Model: Under 6.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-3 · #263
73
5-0 · #5 AP #2
103
Spread
ARIZ -32.5
✓ DEN W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼4
▲ Over 176
Projected
62–94
✓ ARIZ won
Model: DEN by 0.8 ✓ Model: Over 1.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
2-1 · #75
54
4-0 · #8 AP #7
94
Spread
MICH -6.5
✓ MICH W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼1
▼ Under 148
Projected
71–85
✓ MICH won
Model: MICH by 7.3 ✓ Model: Over 7.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
4-1 · #60
87
4-1 · #11
86
Spread
TEX -6.5
✓ ASU W ATS
Total
153.5 ▲1
▲ Over 173
Projected
72–80
✗ TEX lost
Model: TEX by 1.3 ✗ Model: Under 1.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
UNLV
3-2 · #98
67
4-1 · #50
74
Spread
MD -2.5
✓ MD W ATS
Total
164.5 ▲3
▼ Under 141
Projected
81–84
✓ MD won
Model: MD by 0.1 ✓ Model: Over 0.8 ✗
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
3-2 · #157
75
3-3 · #147
68
TROY -2.5 159.5 TROY -5.5 TROY +3.0 169.0 Over 9.5 69% TROY L L ›
Final
4-1 · #105
55
2-2 · #165
62
URI -2.5 140.5 URI -2.5 — 141.6 Over 1.1 59% URI L ›
Final
2-1 · #191
58
2-2 · #163
86
PAC -4.5 145.5 PAC -1.7 STBK +2.8 147.5 Over 2.0 56% PAC L L ›
Final
2-4 · #299
66
2-2 · #200
71
BGSU -10.5 144.5 BGSU -6.7 BUCK +3.8 148.9 Over 4.4 72% BGSU W L ›
Final
0-3 · #342
70
0-4 · #356
65
ETAM -3.5 149.5 ETAM -1.6 FDU +1.9 152.1 Over 2.6 56% ETAM L L ›
Final
3-3 · #209
73
3-3 · #99
65
ORST -3.5 149.5 ORST -4.0 ORST +0.5 155.5 Over 6.0 64% ORST L L ›
Final
4-1 · #62
60
5-0 · #7
85
TENN -14.5 141.5 TENN -14.8 TENN +0.3 146.7 Over 5.2 90% TENN W W ›
Final
4-0 · #138
94
BEL -21.5 157.5 BEL -18.1 SFPA +3.4 154.4 Under 3.1 94% BEL L W ›
Final
3-2 · #102
81
2-2 · #195
73
UAB -2.5 161.5 UAB -3.0 UAB +0.5 165.2 Over 3.7 60% UAB W L ›
Final
2-0 · #160
79
2-1 · #186
73
LIB -8.5 141.5 LIB -6.7 UVM +1.8 150.5 Over 9.0 72% LIB W W ›
Final
1-3 · #223
69
1-3 · #202
64
BCU -3.5 143.5 BCU -4.2 BCU +0.7 148.9 Over 5.4 64% BCU L L ›
Final
3-1 · #37
74
3-0 · #29
81
BAY -3.5 154.5 BAY -1.4 CREI +2.1 158.4 Over 3.9 55% BAY L W ›
Final
5-0 · #67
85
4-0 · #48
74
NCSU -7.5 143.5 NCSU -7.2 HALL +0.3 145.7 Over 2.2 74% NCSU W W ›
Final
1-4 · #320
70
4-0 · #237
78
BUF -5.5 150.5 BUF -8.2 BUF +2.7 154.6 Over 4.1 76% BUF W L ›
Final
1-5 · #226
80
5-1 · #233
75
IONA -5.5 150.5 IONA -4.7 GB +0.8 158.3 Over 7.8 66% IONA W W ›
Final
2-3 · #338
74
2-3 · #281
83
UCR -3.5 144.5 UCR -6.1 UCR +2.6 143.7 Under 0.8 70% UCR W L ›
Final
4-1 · #71
61
3-2 · #16
71
KU -5.5 143.5 KU -8.6 KU +3.1 147.1 Over 3.6 77% KU W L ›
Final
2-2 · #217
74
0-2 · #190
63
W&M -2.5 159.5 W&M -1.4 UTEP +1.1 153.5 Under 6.0 55% W&M L W ›
Final
0-5 · #204
83
2-1 · #293
68
OAK -3.5 148.5 OAK -2.0 LAM +1.5 149.4 Over 0.9 57% OAK L W ›
Final
4-0 · #13
83
3-1 · #9
82
ISU -2.5 158.5 SJU -2.3 SJU +4.8 161.3 Over 2.8 58% SJU W W ›
Final
1-4 · #177
84
1-1 · #148
89
KENN -4.5 159.5 KENN -3.8 RICE +0.7 159.7 Over 0.2 63% KENN L W ›
Final
3-1 · #111
76
3-0 · #123
91
TEM -1.5 148.5 UCSD -1.5 UCSD +3.0 152.1 Over 3.6 55% UCSD W W ›
Final
4-0 · #36
70
4-0 · #86
67
USC -3.5 155.5 USC -5.0 USC +1.5 159.5 Over 4.0 67% USC L L ›
Final
5-1 · #101
92
2-1 · #154
79
GW -9.5 158.5 GW -9.2 MTSU +0.3 160.3 Over 1.8 79% GW L W ›
Final
2-4 · #117
78
1-4 · #255
59
COFC -4.5 141.5 COFC -5.8 COFC +1.3 147.3 Over 5.8 69% COFC W L ›
Final
4-0 · #63
74
5-0 · #2
78
HOU -14.5 140.5 HOU -14.2 SYR +0.3 135.4 Under 5.1 89% HOU W L ›
Final
4-0 · #93
92
1-4 · #128
69
GMU -7.5 142.5 GMU -7.5 — 149.1 Over 6.6 74% GMU W ›
Final
3-2 · #260
73
1-5 · #317
69
SIE -9.5 137.5 SIE -5.8 HC +3.7 139.6 Over 2.1 69% SIE W W ›
Final
2-3 · #296
61
1-4 · #265
67
YSU -1.5 163.5 YSU -2.8 YSU +1.3 162.3 Under 1.2 60% YSU W W ›
Final
2-2 · #232
88
3-2 · #259
53
APP -5.5 143.5 APP -5.6 APP +0.1 149.2 Over 5.7 69% APP L L ›
Final
3-2 · #188
46
5-0 · #14
87
LOU -33.5 162.5 LOU -29.1 EMU +4.4 159.6 Under 2.9 99% LOU L W ›
Final
2-3 · #158
80
0-2 · #178
72
FIU -2.5 155.5 FIU -4.1 FIU +1.6 155.9 Over 0.4 64% FIU L L ›
Final
0-4 · #294
71
1-2 · #230
82
NKU -4.5 156.5 NKU -6.1 NKU +1.6 156.5 — 70% NKU W ›
Final
0-4 · #295
70
0-3 · #339
58
BELL -3.5 156.5 BELL -3.4 CIT +0.1 161.9 Over 5.4 62% BELL L L ›
Final
0-4 · #335
67
1-4 · #258
80
LIN -4.5 152.5 LIN -1.7 KC +2.8 149.2 Under 3.3 56% LIN L W ›
Final
3-3 · #316
67
4-1 · #30
94
CIN -34.5 141.5 CIN -27.7 NJIT +6.8 138.4 Under 3.1 99% CIN W L ›
Final
1-3 · #311
106
2-2 · #337
108
CCSU -3.5 143.5 CCSU -4.6 CCSU +1.1 139.9 Under 3.6 66% CCSU L L ›
Final
2-3 · #135
64
2-3 · #167
88
BRAD -9.5 141.5 BRAD -6.0 PRIN +3.5 143.6 Over 2.1 70% BRAD L W ›
Final
0-4 · #305
88
2-2 · #266
93
FGCU -11.5 153.5 FGCU -10.8 ORU +0.7 157.7 Over 4.2 83% FGCU W W ›
Final
2-3 · #276
78
2-3 · #53
81
MSST -23.5 160.5 MSST -19.6 NOLA +3.9 163.2 Over 2.7 96% MSST W L ›
Final
4-2 · #132
60
2-1 · #127
73
MCN -2.5 158.5 MCN -2.8 MCN +0.3 161.1 Over 2.6 60% MCN W L ›
Final
1-3 · #287
73
5-1 · #4
87
ILL -33.5 164.5 ILL -29.5 RGV +4.0 164.3 Under 0.2 100% ILL W W ›
Final
4-1 · #21
84
4-0 · #57
73
AUB -4.5 155.5 AUB -11.2 AUB +6.7 159.3 Over 3.8 84% AUB W W ›
Final
5-1 · #126
97
4-1 · #118
94
AKR -1.5 156.5 AKR -2.7 AKR +1.2 161.7 Over 5.2 59% AKR L W ›
Final
1-1 · #198
63
2-3 · #171
74
ARST -4.5 155.5 ARST -4.8 ARST +0.3 158.0 Over 2.5 66% ARST W L ›
Final
2-3 · #164
87
0-2 · #321
93
CP -1.5 164.5 CP -1.0 NAU +0.5 155.3 Under 9.2 54% CP W L ›
Final
1-5 · #246
72
6-0 · #55
89
SMU -23.5 165.5 SMU -23.4 RAD +0.1 161.1 Under 4.4 98% SMU W W ›
Final
3-3 · #324
75
1-2 · #250
61
MOST -4.5 145.5 MOST -5.6 MOST +1.1 141.9 Under 3.6 69% MOST L W ›
Final
3-1 · #109
76
5-0 · #121
65
FAU -3.5 144.5 FAU -1.1 LMU +2.4 147.6 Over 3.1 54% FAU L L ›
Final
1-2 · #192
50
1-2 · #253
61
ACU -2.5 144.5 ACU -0.8 UTSA +1.8 147.1 Over 2.6 53% ACU L L ›
Final
1-5 · #221
56
3-2 · #182
77
UCD -9.5 136.5 UCD -11.7 UCD +2.2 138.0 Over 1.5 85% UCD W L ›
Final
5-0 · #17
95
3-1 · #15
85
GONZ -4.5 178.5 ALA -1.3 ALA +5.8 171.7 Under 6.8 54% ALA L L ›
Final
2-3 · #263
73
5-0 · #5
103
ARIZ -32.5 154.5 ARIZ -31.7 DEN +0.8 155.8 Over 1.3 100% ARIZ W W ›
Final
2-1 · #75
54
4-0 · #8
94
MICH -6.5 148.5 MICH -13.8 MICH +7.3 155.5 Over 7.0 89% MICH W L ›
Final
4-1 · #60
87
4-1 · #11
86
TEX -6.5 153.5 TEX -7.8 TEX +1.3 151.8 Under 1.7 75% TEX L L ›
Final
3-2 · #98
67
4-1 · #50
74
MD -2.5 164.5 MD -2.6 MD +0.1 165.3 Over 0.8 59% MD W L ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record