Day in numbers

Tap a number to filter the games below

Games3030 final · 0 to play
Lines moved241+ pt since the open · 30 with a line
Totals moved281+ pt since the open
Favorites ATS11-1937% covered
Upsets5outright
Over / Under15-1550% over
Model Favorite24-680% won
GameSpread, open → closeMovedTotalMoved
HC vs HAMPHC -5.5 → HAMP -4.510 → HAMP149.5 → 148.5▼ 1
AMCC @ OKSTOKST -23.5 → OKST -20.53 → AMCC164.5 → 154.5▼ 10
RAD vs CLERAD -4.5 → RAD -8.54 → RAD154.5 → 162.5▲ 8
LIN @ AAMUAAMU -3.5 → AAMU -3.5no move157.5 → 149.5▼ 8
UIW @ IUIU -25.5 → IU -28.53 → IU150.5 → 157.5▲ 7
ND @ OSUOSU -8.5 → OSU -9.51 → OSU150.5 → 156.5▲ 6
BRY @ VALVAL -3.5 → VAL -6.53 → VAL147.5 → 143.5▼ 4
USF @ KENNUSF -4.5 → USF -7.53 → USF177.5 → 177.5no move
CSU @ LUCCSU -5.5 → CSU -3.52 → LUC145.5 → 151.5▲ 6
HARV @ MRSTMRST -3.5 → MRST -6.53 → MRST127.5 → 130.5▲ 3
Line movedCoveredCover rate
1+ pts5579-5698-549%
2+ pts2172-2236-249%
3+ pts880-90849%
5+ pts139-14948%
Sort by

Sort

Sort by
No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #259
85
0-2 · #251
77
Spread
APP -1.5
✓ APP W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼2
▲ Over 162
Projected
69–70
✗ DART lost
Model: DART by 2.3 ✗ Model: Under 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #354
70
UMBC
1-1 · #264
71
Spread
UMBC -6.5
✓ WAG W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼6
▲ Over 141
Projected
69–77
✓ UMBC won
Model: UMBC by 1.8 ✗ Model: Over 5.3 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-2 · #180
72
3-1 · #151
76
Spread
KENT -4.5
✓ WRST W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲3
▼ Under 148
Projected
81–83
✓ KENT won
Model: WRST by 2.1 ✓ Model: Over 6.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-0 · #71
63
3-0 · #33
64
Spread
OSU -9.5
✓ ND W ATS
Total
156.5 ▲6
▼ Under 127
Projected
76–85
✓ OSU won
Model: ND by 0.4 ✓ Model: Over 4.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-2 · #303
65
0-2 · #215
76
Spread
WCU -12.5
✓ STET W ATS
Total
155.5 ▲2
▼ Under 141
Projected
72–85
✓ WCU won
Model: WCU by 0.2 ✗ Model: Over 1.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #290
50
2-1 · #176
68
Spread
VAL -6.5
✓ VAL W ATS
Total
143.5 ▼4
▼ Under 118
Projected
74–77
✓ VAL won
Model: BRY by 3.9 ✗ Model: Over 7.0 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
0-3 · #317
67
1-2 · #159
61
Spread
HAMP -4.5
✓ HC W ATS
Total
148.5 ▼1
▼ Under 128
Projected
71–76
✗ HAMP lost
Model: HAMP by 0.5 ✗ Model: Under 0.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #84
108
1-0 · #148
89
Spread
USF -7.5
✓ USF W ATS
Total
177.5
▲ Over 197
Projected
86–80
✓ USF won
Model: KENN by 2.1 ✗ Model: Under 11.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #184
84
0-2 · #240
77
Spread
SAM -6.5
✓ SAM W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲2
▲ Over 161
Projected
83–74
✓ SAM won
Model: SAM by 3.2 ✓ Model: Over 5.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #241
70
0-3 · #323
64
Spread
QUIN -3.5
✓ QUIN W ATS
Total
137.5 ▼3
▼ Under 134
Projected
71–70
✓ QUIN won
Model: ME by 2.9 ✗ Model: Over 3.1 ✗
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #314
82
2-2 · #239
85
Spread
FAIR -5.5
✓ L-MD W ATS
Total
135.5 ▲4
▲ Over 167
Projected
68–73
✓ FAIR won
Model: L-MD by 0.9 ✓ Model: Over 5.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #307
75
2-1 · #89
109
Spread
WAKE -30.5
✓ WAKE W ATS
Total
165.5 ▲2
▲ Over 184
Projected
67–90
✓ WAKE won
Model: UML by 7.2 ✗ Model: Under 8.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #141
76
3-0 · #68
84
Spread
VT -18.5
✓ CLT W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼2
▲ Over 160
Projected
68–83
✓ VT won
Model: CLT by 3.0 ✓ Model: Over 5.1 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-3 · #238
69
3-0 · #45
85
Spread
OKST -20.5
✓ AMCC W ATS
Total
154.5 ▼10
▼ Under 154
Projected
65–86
✓ OKST won
Model: OKST by 1.0 ✗ Model: Under 3.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-1 · #337
77
2-1 · #209
84
Spread
MASS -12.5
✓ CCSU W ATS
Total
144.5 ▲3
▲ Over 161
Projected
67–77
✓ MASS won
Model: CCSU by 2.7 ✓ Model: Under 0.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #187
78
1-2 · #291
83
Spread
SDAK -3.5
✓ SDAK W ATS
Total
172.5 ▼2
▼ Under 161
Projected
84–86
✓ SDAK won
Model: WMU by 1.0 ✗ Model: Under 2.9 ✓
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
1-2 · #246
82
0-3 · #315
87
Spread
RAD -8.5
✓ CLE W ATS
Total
162.5 ▲8
▲ Over 169
Projected
81–79
✗ RAD lost
Model: CLE by 6.3 ✓ Model: Under 2.3 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-0 · #2 AP #1
73
3-0 · #21 AP #22
72
Spread
HOU -7.5
✓ AUB W ATS
Total
140.5 ▼1
▲ Over 145
Projected
75–71
✓ HOU won
Model: AUB by 3.5 ✓ Model: Over 6.2 ✓
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #245
82
2-0 · #129
95
Spread
WKU -12.5
✓ WKU W ATS
Total
167.5
▲ Over 177
Projected
75–84
✓ WKU won
Model: TNST by 2.8 ✗ Model: Under 8.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-2 · #183
62
0-2 · #196
64
Spread
SAC -6.5
✓ PRES W ATS
Total
150.5 ▼3
▼ Under 126
Projected
72–73
✓ SAC won
Model: PRES by 4.8 ✓ Model: Under 5.4 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #258
65
1-1 · #328
74
Spread
AAMU -3.5
✓ AAMU W ATS
Total
149.5 ▼8
▼ Under 139
Projected
74–76
✓ AAMU won
Model: LIN by 1.5 ✗ Model: Over 0.2 ✗
FinalNon-conference
3-0 · #87
80
1-3 · #113
67
Spread
CSU -3.5
✓ CSU W ATS
Total
151.5 ▲6
▼ Under 147
Projected
81–73
✓ CSU won
Model: CSU by 4.1 ✓ Model: Over 2.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-1 · #136
56
1-1 · #236
54
Spread
MRST -6.5
✓ HARV W ATS
Total
130.5 ▲3
▼ Under 110
Projected
65–69
✗ MRST lost
Model: HARV by 2.1 ✓ Model: Over 3.5 ✗
FinalNon-conference
UNLV
1-2 · #98
92
1-1 · #76
78
Spread
MEM -9.5
✓ UNLV W ATS
Total
163.5 ▲2
▲ Over 170
Projected
76–85
✗ MEM lost
Model: UNLV by 0.6 ✓ Model: Under 2.6 ✗
FinalNon-conference
0-1 · #289
61
3-0 · #38
69
Spread
IU -28.5
✓ UIW W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲7
▼ Under 130
Projected
65–91
✓ IU won
Model: UIW by 2.2 ✓ Model: Under 1.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #278
55
3-0 · #30
72
Spread
CIN -25.5
✓ MSM W ATS
Total
145.5 ▼2
▼ Under 127
Projected
58–82
✓ CIN won
Model: MSM by 2.4 ✓ Model: Under 5.6 ✓
FinalNon-conference
1-2 · #116
82
0-3 · #297
80
Spread
ILST -8.5
✓ LBSU W ATS
Total
141.5 ▼3
▲ Over 162
Projected
74–66
✓ ILST won
Model: LBSU by 0.1 ✓ Model: Under 1.4 ✗
FinalNon-conference
2-0 · #118
79
3-0 · #23 AP #2
97
Spread
PUR -18.5
✓ AKR W ATS
Total
163.5 ▲4
▲ Over 176
Projected
70–92
✓ PUR won
Model: PUR by 4.0 ✗ Model: Under 1.8 ✗
FinalNon-conference
Troy
2-1 · #147
85
1-2 · #194
94
Spread
TROY -4.5
✓ CSUN W ATS
Total
157.5 ▲1
▲ Over 179
Projected
80–75
✗ TROY lost
Model: TROY by 0.3 ✗ Model: Under 2.7 ✗
FinalNon-conference · Neutral site
3-0 · #25
68
2-1 · #1 AP #10
82
Spread
FLA -10.5
✓ FLA W ATS
Total
171.5 ▲4
▼ Under 150
Projected
76–91
✓ FLA won
Model: FLA by 4.7 ✓ Model: Under 4.0 ✓
StatusMatchupSpreadTotalModel lineSpread edgeModel totalTotal edgeWin probModel
Final
1-2 · #259
85
0-2 · #251
77
APP -1.5 140.5 DART -0.8 DART +2.3 139.7 Under 0.8 53% DART L L ›
Final
0-3 · #354
70
1-1 · #264
71
UMBC -6.5 140.5 UMBC -8.3 UMBC +1.8 145.8 Over 5.3 76% UMBC L W ›
Final
1-2 · #180
72
3-1 · #151
76
KENT -4.5 157.5 KENT -2.4 WRST +2.1 164.1 Over 6.6 58% KENT W L ›
Final
3-0 · #71
63
3-0 · #33
64
OSU -9.5 156.5 OSU -9.1 ND +0.4 161.1 Over 4.6 79% OSU W L ›
Final
0-2 · #303
65
0-2 · #215
76
WCU -12.5 155.5 WCU -12.7 WCU +0.2 157.1 Over 1.6 87% WCU L L ›
Final
1-2 · #290
50
2-1 · #176
68
VAL -6.5 143.5 VAL -2.6 BRY +3.9 150.5 Over 7.0 59% VAL L L ›
Final
0-3 · #317
67
1-2 · #159
61
HAMP -4.5 148.5 HAMP -5.0 HAMP +0.5 147.6 Under 0.9 67% HAMP L W ›
Final
2-1 · #84
108
1-0 · #148
89
USF -7.5 177.5 USF -5.4 KENN +2.1 165.9 Under 11.6 68% USF L L ›
Final
2-2 · #184
84
0-2 · #240
77
SAM -6.5 151.5 SAM -9.7 SAM +3.2 156.7 Over 5.2 80% SAM W W ›
Final
1-2 · #241
70
0-3 · #323
64
QUIN -3.5 137.5 QUIN -0.6 ME +2.9 140.6 Over 3.1 52% QUIN L L ›
Final
1-2 · #314
82
2-2 · #239
85
FAIR -5.5 135.5 FAIR -4.6 L-MD +0.9 141.4 Over 5.9 66% FAIR W W ›
Final
0-3 · #307
75
2-1 · #89
109
WAKE -30.5 165.5 WAKE -23.3 UML +7.2 157.0 Under 8.5 98% WAKE L L ›
Final
2-1 · #141
76
3-0 · #68
84
VT -18.5 145.5 VT -15.5 CLT +3.0 150.6 Over 5.1 91% VT W W ›
Final
0-3 · #238
69
3-0 · #45
85
OKST -20.5 154.5 OKST -21.5 OKST +1.0 150.6 Under 3.9 97% OKST L W ›
Final
1-1 · #337
77
2-1 · #209
84
MASS -12.5 144.5 MASS -9.8 CCSU +2.7 143.7 Under 0.8 80% MASS W L ›
Final
2-1 · #187
78
1-2 · #291
83
SDAK -3.5 172.5 SDAK -2.5 WMU +1.0 169.6 Under 2.9 59% SDAK L W ›
Final
1-2 · #246
82
0-3 · #315
87
RAD -8.5 162.5 RAD -2.2 CLE +6.3 160.2 Under 2.3 58% RAD W L ›
Final
3-0 · #2
73
3-0 · #21
72
HOU -7.5 140.5 HOU -4.0 AUB +3.5 146.7 Over 6.2 64% HOU W W ›
Final
0-1 · #245
82
2-0 · #129
95
WKU -12.5 167.5 WKU -9.7 TNST +2.8 158.9 Under 8.6 80% WKU L L ›
Final
2-2 · #183
62
0-2 · #196
64
SAC -6.5 150.5 SAC -1.7 PRES +4.8 145.1 Under 5.4 56% SAC W W ›
Final
1-2 · #258
65
1-1 · #328
74
AAMU -3.5 149.5 AAMU -2.0 LIN +1.5 149.7 Over 0.2 57% AAMU L L ›
Final
3-0 · #87
80
1-3 · #113
67
CSU -3.5 151.5 CSU -7.6 CSU +4.1 154.0 Over 2.5 75% CSU W L ›
Final
2-1 · #136
56
1-1 · #236
54
MRST -6.5 130.5 MRST -4.4 HARV +2.1 134.0 Over 3.5 65% MRST W L ›
Final
1-2 · #98
92
1-1 · #76
78
MEM -9.5 163.5 MEM -8.9 UNLV +0.6 160.9 Under 2.6 78% MEM W L ›
Final
0-1 · #289
61
3-0 · #38
69
IU -28.5 157.5 IU -26.3 UIW +2.2 155.9 Under 1.6 99% IU W W ›
Final
1-2 · #278
55
3-0 · #30
72
CIN -25.5 145.5 CIN -23.1 MSM +2.4 139.9 Under 5.6 98% CIN W W ›
Final
1-2 · #116
82
0-3 · #297
80
ILST -8.5 141.5 ILST -8.4 LBSU +0.1 140.1 Under 1.4 77% ILST W L ›
Final
2-0 · #118
79
3-0 · #23
97
PUR -18.5 163.5 PUR -22.5 PUR +4.0 161.7 Under 1.8 98% PUR L L ›
Final
2-1 · #147
85
1-2 · #194
94
TROY -4.5 157.5 TROY -4.8 TROY +0.3 154.8 Under 2.7 66% TROY L L ›
Final
3-0 · #25
68
2-1 · #1
82
FLA -10.5 171.5 FLA -15.2 FLA +4.7 167.5 Under 4.0 91% FLA W W ›
The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record