No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.8
Projected
38–39
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
35–40
✗ OSU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
33–41
✓ WCU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
35–36
✗ VAL lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
33–36
✗ HAMP lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.7
Projected
41–37
✓ USF won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
40–34
✗ SAM lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
33–33
✗ QUIN lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.5
Projected
30–44
✓ WAKE won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
31–40
✓ VT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
29–42
✓ OKST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
31–37
✓ MASS won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.4
Projected
39–40
✓ SDAK won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.0
Projected
38–37
✓ RAD won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
34–40
✓ WKU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
34–34
✗ SAC lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
35–36
✓ AAMU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
39–34
✓ CSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
29–44
✓ IU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.6
Projected
26–40
✗ CIN lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.7
Projected
36–30
✓ ILST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
38–35
✗ TROY lost
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 1-2 · #259 0-2 · #251 |
— | — | DART -0.3 | — | 65.5 | — | 51% DART | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #354 1-1 · #264 |
— | — | UMBC -4.8 | — | 68.3 | — | 70% UMBC | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #180 3-1 · #151 |
— | — | KENT -1.3 | — | 76.8 | — | 55% KENT | › | |
| Half final | 3-0 · #71 3-0 · #33 |
— | — | OSU -5.3 | — | 75.5 | — | 72% OSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-2 · #303 0-2 · #215 |
— | — | WCU -7.5 | — | 73.6 | — | 79% WCU | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #290 2-1 · #176 |
— | — | VAL -1.4 | — | 70.5 | — | 56% VAL | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #317 1-2 · #159 |
— | — | HAMP -2.9 | — | 69.2 | — | 62% HAMP | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #84 1-0 · #148 |
— | — | USF -3.4 | — | 77.7 | — | 65% USF | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #184 0-2 · #240 |
— | — | SAM -6.0 | — | 73.4 | — | 75% SAM | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #241 0-3 · #323 |
— | — | QUIN -0.5 | — | 65.9 | — | 52% QUIN | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #314 2-2 · #239 |
— | — | FAIR -2.6 | — | 66.3 | — | 61% FAIR | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #307 2-1 · #89 |
— | — | WAKE -13.9 | — | 73.5 | — | 94% WAKE | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #141 3-0 · #68 |
— | — | VT -9.2 | — | 70.5 | — | 84% VT | › | |
| Half final | 0-3 · #238 3-0 · #45 |
— | — | OKST -12.9 | — | 70.6 | — | 92% OKST | › | |
| Half final | 1-1 · #337 2-1 · #209 |
— | — | MASS -5.8 | — | 67.3 | — | 74% MASS | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #187 1-2 · #291 |
— | — | SDAK -1.4 | — | 79.4 | — | 56% SDAK | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #246 0-3 · #315 |
— | — | RAD -1.5 | — | 75.0 | — | 57% RAD | › | |
| Half final | 3-0 · #2 3-0 · #21 |
— | — | HOU -2.6 | — | 68.8 | — | 61% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #245 2-0 · #129 |
— | — | WKU -5.7 | — | 74.4 | — | 73% WKU | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #183 0-2 · #196 |
— | — | SAC -0.9 | — | 68.0 | — | 54% SAC | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #258 1-1 · #328 |
— | — | AAMU -1.1 | — | 70.1 | — | 55% AAMU | › | |
| Half final | 3-0 · #87 1-3 · #113 |
— | — | CSU -4.8 | — | 72.1 | — | 70% CSU | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #136 1-1 · #236 |
— | — | MRST -2.5 | — | 62.8 | — | 61% MRST | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #98 1-1 · #76 |
— | — | MEM -5.2 | — | 75.4 | — | 72% MEM | › | |
| Half final | 0-1 · #289 3-0 · #38 |
— | — | IU -15.7 | — | 73.0 | — | 96% IU | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #278 3-0 · #30 |
— | — | CIN -13.8 | — | 65.6 | — | 93% CIN | › | |
| Half final | 1-2 · #116 0-3 · #297 |
— | — | ILST -5.3 | — | 65.7 | — | 72% ILST | › | |
| Half final | 2-0 · #118 3-0 · #23 |
— | — | PUR -13.5 | — | 75.7 | — | 93% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 2-1 · #147 1-2 · #194 |
— | — | TROY -3.1 | — | 72.5 | — | 63% TROY | › | |
| Half final | 3-0 · #25 2-1 · #1 |
— | — | FLA -9.0 | — | 78.4 | — | 84% FLA | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record