No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.2
Projected
33–43
✗ UIC lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
32–38
✓ LIP won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
36–32
✗ NE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
34–35
✓ YSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
37–31
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
34–37
✓ WMU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
31–39
✓ JMU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 61.3
Projected
28–34
✗ LAM lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
31–35
✗ AMER lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
35–38
✗ TOW lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
31–38
✗ DART lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
33–35
✗ UPST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.6
Projected
36–41
✓ HPU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.4
Projected
31–34
✓ WOF won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
35–33
✗ LT lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
36–36
✗ RAD lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
36–37
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
32–39
✓ UNCW won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.6
Projected
34–42
✓ QUC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.1
Projected
37–38
✓ FIU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
35–39
✓ KENT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
30–36
✓ OHIO won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
32–36
✓ HAMP won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.9
Projected
36–29
✓ NAVY won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.2
Projected
22–41
✓ WVU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
33–35
✓ COLU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
34–40
✓ NKU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.9
Projected
36–41
✓ OAK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 83.0
Projected
40–44
✓ DETM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.5
Projected
36–37
✗ MSM lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.2
Projected
26–37
✓ HALL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
33–35
✓ MASS won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
31–43
✓ AKR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
33–36
✓ SFA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.9
Projected
39–38
✗ LOU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.4
Projected
36–44
✓ ALA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Projected
40–33
✓ LSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
34–40
✓ ULM won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
33–33
✓ CARK won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
36–37
✓ BEL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
23–48
✓ ISU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
36–34
✗ TNST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.9
Projected
38–38
✓ UNCO won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
35–34
✓ SDST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
33–36
✓ MONM won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
35–31
✗ IDST lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
30–41
✓ GTWN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.9
Projected
31–34
✓ EVAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
32–40
✓ ILST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.0
Projected
39–38
✓ PRST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
31–40
✓ MEM won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
29–41
✓ BYU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.2
Projected
37–37
✗ MONT lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
35–40
✓ WEB won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.4
Projected
32–34
✓ RICE won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
34–36
✓ MTST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
34–39
✓ WIS won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.4
Projected
33–38
✓ IDHO won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
37–38
✓ DEN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.2
Projected
34–29
✓ PAC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.6
Projected
37–42
✓ VAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
35–38
✗ TEX lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
37–35
✓ MSST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.3
Projected
37–43
✓ AUB won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
35–36
✓ ORST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
29–41
✓ SCU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
33–37
✓ SDSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
31–38
✓ SF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
35–33
✓ UCLA won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final | 0-8 · #363 3-3 · #110 |
— | — | UIC -10.3 | — | 76.2 | — | 87% UIC | › | |
| Half final | 1-5 · #282 3-4 · #214 |
— | — | LIP -6.0 | — | 70.5 | — | 75% LIP | › | |
| Half final | 3-4 · #229 1-6 · #317 |
— | — | NE -3.7 | — | 67.7 | — | 66% NE | › | |
| Half final | 2-4 · #180 3-4 · #265 |
— | — | YSU -1.2 | — | 69.7 | — | 55% YSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-0 · #38 4-4 · #70 |
— | — | IU -5.3 | — | 67.8 | — | 72% IU | › | |
| Half final | 1-5 · #304 3-4 · #187 |
— | — | WMU -3.6 | — | 70.5 | — | 65% WMU | › | |
| Half final | 0-6 · #357 4-4 · #158 |
— | — | JMU -7.9 | — | 70.3 | — | 81% JMU | › | |
| Half final | 1-7 · #221 2-2 · #293 |
— | — | LAM -6.4 | — | 61.3 | — | 76% LAM | › | |
| Half final | 3-4 · #262 3-4 · #153 |
— | — | AMER -3.0 | — | 65.9 | — | 63% AMER | › | |
| Half final | 4-3 · #179 4-3 · #165 |
— | — | TOW -3.1 | — | 73.2 | — | 63% TOW | › | |
| Half final | 0-6 · #286 1-3 · #251 |
— | — | DART -6.6 | — | 68.5 | — | 77% DART | › | |
| Half final | 4-3 · #283 2-5 · #325 |
— | — | UPST -1.6 | — | 68.1 | — | 57% UPST | › | |
| Half final | 3-4 · #195 6-1 · #90 |
— | — | HPU -5.3 | — | 76.6 | — | 72% HPU | › | |
| Half final | 3-5 · #183 4-3 · #248 |
— | — | WOF -2.7 | — | 65.4 | — | 62% WOF | › | |
| Half final | 3-2 · #244 3-5 · #296 |
— | — | LT -1.5 | — | 68.3 | — | 56% LT | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #224 1-6 · #246 |
— | — | RAD -0.3 | — | 72.5 | — | 51% RAD | › | |
| Half final | 2-4 · #152 3-3 · #232 |
— | — | ELON -0.9 | — | 73.0 | — | 54% ELON | › | |
| Half final | 5-2 · #231 6-1 · #120 |
— | — | UNCW -6.2 | — | 70.8 | — | 75% UNCW | › | |
| Half final | 0-8 · #348 2-5 · #175 |
— | — | QUC -7.9 | — | 76.6 | — | 81% QUC | › | |
| Half final | 4-3 · #266 1-3 · #178 |
— | — | FIU -0.8 | — | 74.1 | — | 54% FIU | › | |
| Half final | 3-3 · #210 6-1 · #151 |
— | — | KENT -3.9 | — | 73.2 | — | 66% KENT | › | |
| Half final | 0-9 · #323 1-6 · #128 |
— | — | OHIO -6.0 | — | 66.0 | — | 74% OHIO | › | |
| Half final | 2-5 · #314 2-5 · #159 |
— | — | HAMP -4.1 | — | 67.4 | — | 67% HAMP | › | |
| Half final | 3-5 · #199 0-6 · #351 |
— | — | NAVY -6.7 | — | 64.9 | — | 77% NAVY | › | |
| Half final | 1-8 · #352 6-2 · #47 |
— | — | WVU -19.3 | — | 63.2 | — | 98% WVU | › | |
| Half final | 4-3 · #166 6-1 · #170 |
— | — | COLU -2.1 | — | 67.7 | — | 59% COLU | › | |
| Half final | 1-6 · #315 4-2 · #230 |
— | — | NKU -6.1 | — | 74.3 | — | 75% NKU | › | |
| Half final | 1-5 · #249 2-5 · #204 |
— | — | OAK -5.3 | — | 76.9 | — | 72% OAK | › | |
| Half final | 2-6 · #340 1-6 · #277 |
— | — | DETM -4.0 | — | 83.0 | — | 67% DETM | › | |
| Half final | 1-5 · #311 2-6 · #278 |
— | — | MSM -0.7 | — | 72.5 | — | 53% MSM | › | |
| Half final | 3-2 · #337 7-1 · #67 |
— | — | HALL -10.5 | — | 63.2 | — | 87% HALL | › | |
| Half final | 4-4 · #136 4-3 · #209 |
— | — | MASS -1.7 | — | 68.1 | — | 57% MASS | › | |
| Half final | 2-7 · #299 5-2 · #118 |
— | — | AKR -11.9 | — | 74.3 | — | 90% AKR | › | |
| Half final | 1-4 · #287 4-2 · #193 |
— | — | SFA -3.1 | — | 69.5 | — | 63% SFA | › | |
| Half final | 7-0 · #14 5-2 · #18 |
— | — | LOU -2.0 | — | 76.9 | — | 59% LOU | › | |
| Half final | 7-1 · #35 5-2 · #15 |
— | — | ALA -8.0 | — | 79.4 | — | 81% ALA | › | |
| Half final | 7-0 · #51 4-4 · #95 |
— | — | LSU -7.1 | — | 72.6 | — | 78% LSU | › | |
| Half final | 0-7 · #366 0-6 · #358 |
— | — | ULM -5.9 | — | 73.6 | — | 74% ULM | › | |
| Half final | 1-5 · #222 2-5 · #240 |
— | — | CARK -0.9 | — | 65.9 | — | 54% CARK | › | |
| Half final | 5-1 · #104 7-0 · #138 |
— | — | BEL -1.8 | — | 72.7 | — | 58% BEL | › | |
| Half final | 1-8 · #360 7-0 · #13 |
— | — | ISU -24.7 | — | 71.1 | — | 100% ISU | › | |
| Half final | 2-3 · #245 2-3 · #328 |
— | — | TNST -2.6 | — | 70.0 | — | 61% TNST | › | |
| Half final | 4-1 · #219 1-6 · #279 |
— | — | UNCO -0.8 | — | 75.9 | — | 54% UNCO | › | |
| Half final | 2-4 · #201 2-2 · #321 |
— | — | SDST -1.7 | — | 69.0 | — | 57% SDST | › | |
| Half final | 2-7 · #135 3-4 · #155 |
— | — | MONM -3.1 | — | 68.2 | — | 63% MONM | › | |
| Half final | 2-4 · #344 0-6 · #335 |
— | — | IDST -3.8 | — | 66.0 | — | 66% IDST | › | |
| Half final | 3-2 · #264 5-2 · #64 |
— | — | GTWN -11.1 | — | 70.3 | — | 89% GTWN | › | |
| Half final | 2-5 · #181 1-5 · #255 |
— | — | EVAN -2.8 | — | 64.9 | — | 62% EVAN | › | |
| Half final | 0-6 · #294 5-2 · #116 |
— | — | ILST -7.9 | — | 72.0 | — | 80% ILST | › | |
| Half final | 2-2 · #274 4-3 · #291 |
— | — | PRST -0.8 | — | 77.0 | — | 53% PRST | › | |
| Half final | 2-5 · #276 2-4 · #76 |
— | — | MEM -9.2 | — | 71.6 | — | 84% MEM | › | |
| Half final | 7-1 · #203 6-1 · #24 |
— | — | BYU -12.9 | — | 70.0 | — | 92% BYU | › | |
| Half final | 3-3 · #213 2-4 · #273 |
— | — | MONT -0.1 | — | 73.2 | — | 51% MONT | › | |
| Half final | 1-6 · #305 2-4 · #313 |
— | — | WEB -4.6 | — | 74.7 | — | 69% WEB | › | |
| Half final | 4-4 · #103 2-6 · #177 |
— | — | RICE -1.8 | — | 65.4 | — | 58% RICE | › | |
| Half final | 5-3 · #212 1-5 · #162 |
— | — | MTST -1.9 | — | 69.6 | — | 58% MTST | › | |
| Half final | 5-2 · #59 5-2 · #41 |
— | — | WIS -4.5 | — | 73.0 | — | 69% WIS | › | |
| Half final | 2-6 · #336 2-3 · #247 |
— | — | IDHO -4.9 | — | 70.4 | — | 70% IDHO | › | |
| Half final | 0-6 · #254 2-5 · #263 |
— | — | DEN -1.0 | — | 75.5 | — | 54% DEN | › | |
| Half final | 5-2 · #163 3-6 · #220 |
— | — | PAC -4.9 | — | 63.2 | — | 70% PAC | › | |
| Half final | 8-0 · #55 8-0 · #22 |
— | — | VAN -5.1 | — | 79.6 | — | 71% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 6-1 · #20 5-2 · #11 |
— | — | TEX -2.6 | — | 73.0 | — | 61% TEX | › | |
| Half final | 3-4 · #53 5-3 · #94 |
— | — | MSST -2.4 | — | 72.1 | — | 60% MSST | › | |
| Half final | 5-2 · #48 6-2 · #21 |
— | — | AUB -5.8 | — | 80.3 | — | 74% AUB | › | |
| Half final | 3-4 · #186 3-5 · #99 |
— | — | ORST -1.7 | — | 70.6 | — | 57% ORST | › | |
| Half final | 3-5 · #268 6-1 · #106 |
— | — | SCU -12.2 | — | 69.8 | — | 91% SCU | › | |
| Half final | 3-2 · #150 3-3 · #75 |
— | — | SDSU -3.6 | — | 70.3 | — | 65% SDSU | › | |
| Half final | 2-4 · #292 4-3 · #161 |
— | — | SF -7.1 | — | 68.5 | — | 78% SF | › | |
| Half final | 5-2 · #26 5-2 · #56 |
— | — | UCLA -1.8 | — | 68.0 | — | 58% UCLA | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record