No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.6
Projected
38–28
✓ USA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.7
Projected
31–46
✓ LOU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
30–40
✓ UVA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.4
Projected
35–33
✓ CLEM won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
28–46
✓ TEX won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.6
Projected
31–33
✓ NHVN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
33–35
✓ NE won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
31–35
✗ BU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.3
Projected
35–40
✓ TOL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
35–35
✓ JAX won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.7
Projected
37–37
✗ UTC lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.6
Projected
41–37
✓ KENT won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
38–32
✓ PSU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.0
Projected
29–42
✓ YALE won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
27–42
✓ KU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
35–35
✗ UNCG lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.3
Projected
36–37
✗ DEN lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.6
Projected
27–42
✓ GMU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
36–38
✓ WIN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
37–34
✓ WOF won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
33–37
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
40–34
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
36–32
✓ M-OH won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.9
Projected
33–32
✗ L-MD lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.1
Projected
38–39
✗ SMU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
35–36
✗ TEM lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
37–35
✓ HARV won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
36–36
✗ SEMO lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.4
Projected
28–50
✓ VAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
35–35
✓ UNA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.8
Projected
37–40
✓ QUC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
31–39
✓ LONG won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
27–43
✓ MSST won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
35–36
✗ RAD lost
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
29–39
✓ SYR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
31–40
✓ USU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
30–41
✓ BOIS won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
32–38
✗ UCSD lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
33–37
✓ SBU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.9
Projected
32–36
✓ MERC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
32–35
✓ NJIT won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
33–38
✓ TXST won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.9
Projected
34–38
✗ UCR lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
38–33
✓ PAC won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
31–38
✓ MUR won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.9
Projected
31–49
✓ SJU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
31–35
✓ DAV won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
34–36
✓ UTA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
31–41
✓ GW won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.7
Projected
36–36
✓ CONN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
32–37
✓ LT won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
37–37
✗ NEB lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
34–37
✓ SCU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
32–40
✓ UNCW won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
31–36
✗ BALL lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.9
Projected
35–35
✗ JMU lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
31–40
✓ DAY won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.8
Projected
34–41
✓ ELON won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
34–38
✓ OMA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.7
Projected
37–40
✓ SLU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.8
Projected
32–39
✓ VILL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.3
Projected
40–36
✓ BEL won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
26–42
✗ MINN lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.1
Projected
36–37
✗ PEPP lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
34–38
✓ WYO won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
35–33
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.5
Projected
34–42
✓ UTAH won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
31–42
✓ MAN won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.0
Projected
36–36
✓ UVU won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.6
Projected
33–37
✓ UCI won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.7
Projected
32–36
✗ SF lost
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
30–36
✓ SEA won
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
30–39
✓ HAW won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Half final |  3-0 · #228  0-5 · #352 |
— | — | USA -10.3 | — | 65.6 | — | 87% USA | › | |
| Half final |  1-2 · #128  3-0 · #14 |
— | — | LOU -15.8 | — | 76.7 | — | 96% LOU | › | |
| Half final |  3-0 · #231  3-0 · #20 |
— | — | UVA -9.3 | — | 69.8 | — | 84% UVA | › | |
| Half final |  3-0 · #35  3-0 · #64 |
— | — | CLEM -2.3 | — | 68.4 | — | 60% CLEM | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #335  2-1 · #11 |
— | — | TEX -17.3 | — | 73.7 | — | 97% TEX | › | |
| Half final |  0-3 · #351  1-3 · #355 |
— | — | NHVN -1.7 | — | 63.6 | — | 57% NHVN | › | |
| Half final |  1-0 · #186  2-1 · #229 |
— | — | NE -1.9 | — | 67.4 | — | 58% NE | › | |
| Half final |  0-3 · #225  2-1 · #261 |
— | — | BU -4.0 | — | 65.5 | — | 67% BU | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #277  1-2 · #157 |
— | — | TOL -4.7 | — | 74.3 | — | 70% TOL | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #223  1-1 · #320 |
— | — | JAX -1.0 | — | 69.9 | — | 54% JAX | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #227  0-2 · #266 |
— | — | FGCU -0.0 | — | 74.7 | — | 50% FGCU | › | |
| Half final |  2-1 · #151  0-2 · #315 |
— | — | KENT -4.7 | — | 77.6 | — | 70% KENT | › | |
| Half final |  3-0 · #78  2-1 · #124 |
— | — | PSU -6.4 | — | 70.0 | — | 76% PSU | › | |
| Half final |  1-0 · #191  2-0 · #126 |
— | — | YALE -12.5 | — | 71.0 | — | 91% YALE | › | |
| Half final |  1-1 · #135  2-1 · #16 |
— | — | KU -14.9 | — | 69.1 | — | 95% KU | › | |
| Half final |  1-1 · #210  0-3 · #284 |
— | — | UNCG -0.2 | — | 69.9 | — | 51% UNCG | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #192  1-2 · #263 |
— | — | DEN -0.6 | — | 73.3 | — | 53% DEN | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #286  2-0 · #93 |
— | — | GMU -15.5 | — | 68.6 | — | 95% GMU | › | |
| Half final |  1-1 · #242  1-2 · #205 |
— | — | WIN -2.2 | — | 73.6 | — | 60% WIN | › | |
| Half final |  1-2 · #248  0-2 · #295 |
— | — | WOF -2.9 | — | 70.3 | — | 62% WOF | › | |
| Half final |  2-1 · #50  3-1 · #42 |
— | — | MARQ -3.4 | — | 70.0 | — | 65% MARQ | › | |
| Half final |  1-1 · #110  0-3 · #362 |
— | — | UIC -6.8 | — | 73.8 | — | 77% UIC | › | |
| Half final |  1-0 · #125  0-3 · #220 |
— | — | M-OH -3.8 | — | 68.1 | — | 66% M-OH | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #314  0-3 · #349 |
— | — | L-MD -1.5 | — | 64.9 | — | 56% L-MD | › | |
| Half final |  3-0 · #72  3-0 · #55 |
— | — | SMU -1.5 | — | 77.1 | — | 56% SMU | › | |
| Half final |  1-2 · #95  2-0 · #111 |
— | — | TEM -1.5 | — | 70.5 | — | 57% TEM | › | |
| Half final |  1-1 · #136  0-2 · #288 |
— | — | HARV -2.0 | — | 71.9 | — | 59% HARV | › | |
| Half final |  2-2 · #212  0-2 · #306 |
— | — | SEMO -0.3 | — | 71.5 | — | 51% SEMO | › | |
| Half final |  0-4 · #363  3-0 · #22 |
— | — | VAN -22.3 | — | 77.4 | — | 99% VAN | › | |
| Half final |  1-1 · #173  1-1 · #292 |
— | — | UNA -0.5 | — | 69.5 | — | 52% UNA | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #311  0-3 · #175 |
— | — | QUC -2.5 | — | 76.8 | — | 61% QUC | › | |
| Half final |  0-3 · #272  1-1 · #218 |
— | — | LONG -7.8 | — | 69.3 | — | 80% LONG | › | |
| Half final |  0-3 · #252  1-1 · #53 |
— | — | MSST -15.1 | — | 69.9 | — | 95% MSST | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #180  1-1 · #246 |
— | — | RAD -1.1 | — | 71.7 | — | 55% RAD | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #262  2-0 · #63 |
— | — | SYR -10.3 | — | 68.3 | — | 87% SYR | › | |
| Half final |  0-1 · #190  2-0 · #58 |
— | — | USU -9.5 | — | 71.2 | — | 85% USU | › | |
| Half final |  0-3 · #162  2-0 · #86 |
— | — | BOIS -11.0 | — | 70.1 | — | 89% BOIS | › | |
| Half final |  1-1 · #247  2-0 · #123 |
— | — | UCSD -6.1 | — | 70.6 | — | 75% UCSD | › | |
| Half final |  1-1 · #265  3-0 · #142 |
— | — | SBU -4.2 | — | 69.2 | — | 68% SBU | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #345  1-2 · #331 |
— | — | MERC -3.8 | — | 67.9 | — | 66% MERC | › | |
| Half final |  0-3 · #356  2-1 · #316 |
— | — | NJIT -3.1 | — | 67.8 | — | 63% NJIT | › | |
| Half final |  0-3 · #322  1-2 · #103 |
— | — | TXST -4.4 | — | 70.8 | — | 69% TXST | › | |
| Half final |  0-3 · #336  1-1 · #281 |
— | — | UCR -3.7 | — | 71.9 | — | 66% UCR | › | |
| Half final |  1-1 · #163  0-2 · #312 |
— | — | PAC -4.5 | — | 71.3 | — | 69% PAC | › | |
| Half final |  0-3 · #285  2-1 · #132 |
— | — | MUR -7.1 | — | 69.6 | — | 78% MUR | › | |
| Half final |  1-1 · #217  1-1 · #9 |
— | — | SJU -18.0 | — | 79.9 | — | 98% SJU | › | |
| Half final |  2-0 · #200  2-0 · #115 |
— | — | DAV -3.1 | — | 66.0 | — | 63% DAV | › | |
| Half final |  0-1 · #250  0-1 · #257 |
— | — | UTA -1.9 | — | 69.2 | — | 58% UTA | › | |
| Half final |  1-1 · #234  3-0 · #101 |
— | — | GW -9.7 | — | 72.2 | — | 86% GW | › | |
| Half final |  3-0 · #24  3-0 · #6 |
— | — | CONN -0.7 | — | 71.7 | — | 53% CONN | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #280  0-1 · #244 |
— | — | LT -4.9 | — | 69.3 | — | 71% LT | › | |
| Half final |  2-1 · #31  3-0 · #27 |
— | — | NEB -0.5 | — | 73.4 | — | 52% NEB | › | |
| Half final |  3-0 · #96  2-0 · #106 |
— | — | SCU -2.6 | — | 71.2 | — | 61% SCU | › | |
| Half final |  1-1 · #325  0-1 · #120 |
— | — | UNCW -8.0 | — | 72.2 | — | 81% UNCW | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #222  1-1 · #181 |
— | — | BALL -4.3 | — | 66.8 | — | 68% BALL | › | |
| Half final |  1-2 · #158  2-1 · #324 |
— | — | JMU -0.8 | — | 69.9 | — | 53% JMU | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #202  2-1 · #91 |
— | — | DAY -9.2 | — | 70.7 | — | 84% DAY | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #348  1-1 · #232 |
— | — | ELON -6.6 | — | 74.8 | — | 77% ELON | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #267  0-3 · #279 |
— | — | OMA -4.5 | — | 72.1 | — | 69% OMA | › | |
| Half final |  2-1 · #80  3-0 · #69 |
— | — | SLU -3.8 | — | 76.7 | — | 66% SLU | › | |
| Half final |  3-0 · #107  2-1 · #32 |
— | — | VILL -7.6 | — | 70.8 | — | 80% VILL | › | |
| Half final |  2-0 · #138  0-2 · #305 |
— | — | BEL -4.4 | — | 76.3 | — | 69% BEL | › | |
| Half final |  0-3 · #226  2-1 · #70 |
— | — | MINN -16.0 | — | 68.8 | — | 96% MINN | › | |
| Half final |  0-0 · #219  0-1 · #172 |
— | — | PEPP -1.1 | — | 72.1 | — | 55% PEPP | › | |
| Half final |  2-0 · #169  2-0 · #122 |
— | — | WYO -4.2 | — | 71.3 | — | 68% WYO | › | |
| Half final |  3-0 · #82  0-0 · #133 |
— | — | UNM -2.2 | — | 68.3 | — | 60% UNM | › | |
| Half final |  0-1 · #189  3-0 · #73 |
— | — | UTAH -8.2 | — | 76.5 | — | 82% UTAH | › | |
| Half final |  0-4 · #366  1-2 · #330 |
— | — | MAN -10.3 | — | 72.9 | — | 87% MAN | › | |
| Half final |  0-1 · #150  1-2 · #174 |
— | — | UVU -0.4 | — | 72.0 | — | 52% UVU | › | |
| Half final |  0-2 · #313  0-1 · #149 |
— | — | UCI -4.6 | — | 69.6 | — | 69% UCI | › | |
| Half final |  1-2 · #167  1-1 · #161 |
— | — | SF -4.0 | — | 67.7 | — | 67% SF | › | |
| Half final |  1-1 · #344  2-1 · #119 |
— | — | SEA -5.4 | — | 65.8 | — | 72% SEA | › | |
| Half final |  2-3 · #268  3-1 · #140 |
— | — | HAW -9.0 | — | 69.7 | — | 84% HAW | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record